Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology最新文献

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a prevalent chronic inflammatory arthritis worldwide, significantly impacting patients and population health. The disease affects women primarily, with a female-to-male ratio of three to one. Its pathogenesis is multifactorial, including genetic and environmental risk factors. Epidemiological studies highlight the link between the environment and genetic susceptibility to RA. The so-called shared epitope is the most significant risk factor that seems to act synergetic with other environmental factors in the disease occurrence. In addition, recent findings suggest a potential role of new substantial environmental factors, such as the observed pollution of the planet's natural resources, on the susceptibility and progression of the disease. This review summarises the most decisive evidence on epidemiology and genetic, environmental, and lifestyle risk factors for RA. It shows that studying genetic and environmental factors in correlation could lead to prevention strategies that may impact the natural history of the disease.

Introduction: Eosinophilic Fasciitis (EF) is a rare disease, originally proposed as "diffuse fasciitis with eosinophilia" by Shulman in 1974. Symptoms of EF include peripheral eosinophilia accompanied by symmetrical inflammation of the subcutaneous fascia and muscle, usually locating in the upper arms or thighs. There is no approved standard of care treatment.

Methods: Taking into account that eosinophils may be pathogenetically involved in EF, we performed a review on Medline focusing on anti-Interleukin-5 (IL-5) therapies in EF.

Results: Only one case of a patient with EF has been reported who was successfully treated with reslizumab, an anti-IL-5 therapy. The patient had EF refractory to the commonly used immunosuppressive treatment but when reslizumab was added, the patient experienced remission of her symptoms.

Discussion: The exact aetiology of EF is still unclear, and many therapeutic approaches have been tested. Commonly used immunosuppressive agents, such as corticosteroids are not always effective and associate with significant side effects. Eosinophils seem to have a role in the pathogenesis of the disease; anti-eosinophilic therapies targeting IL-5/IL-5 Receptor could be an attractive alternative for the treatment of the disease.

Objectives: To compare the presentation, angiographic features, evolution, and prognosis of prepulseless Takayasu arteritis (TAK) with TAK with pulse loss.

Methods: Pre-pulseless TAK (defined as without pulse loss in the upper limbs, lower limb, carotid, or subclavian arteries) were identified from a cohort of TAK. Demographic characteristics, clinical features, angiographic involvement, baseline and longitudinal patterns of disease activity, medication use, and mortality rates were compared between pre-pulseless TAK and TAK with pulse loss. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR, with 95%CI) for categorical variables between pre-pulseless TAK and TAK with pulse loss were computed using multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models. Time-to-event data was compared using hazard ratios (HR) with 95%CI.

Results: Compared with TAK with pulse loss, pre-pulseless TAK (91/238, 38.24%) more frequently had deranged renal function (aOR 4.43, 95%CI 1.58-12.37) and Hata's type IV disease (aOR 8.02, 95%CI 2.61-24.65), and less often had pulse or blood pressure asymmetry (aOR 0.34, 95%CI 0.18-0.63), limb claudication (aOR for upper limb 0.38, 95%CI 0.18-0.82, for lower limb 0.28, 95%CI 0.12-0.68), right subclavian (aOR 0.45, 95%CI 0.23-0.90) or left carotid artery involvement (aOR 0.42, 95%CI 0.21-0.84). Only two patients with pre-pulseless TAK developed pulse loss on follow-up. Despite fewer pre-pulseless TAK having active disease at presentation, similar proportions of patients in both groups had active disease on follow-up. Survival was similar in both groups (HR for mortality 0.41, 95%CI 0.09-1.90).

Conclusion: Pulse loss on follow-up is uncommon in those with prepulseless TAK. Pre-pulseless TAK is associated with similar long-term outcomes to TAK with pulse loss.

Inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs), such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthropathy (SpA), comprise a heterogeneous group of immune-mediated disorders, characterised by the presence of localised and/or systemic inflammation. The limited knowledge of the pathogenesis and the complex mechanisms involved in the induction and maintenance of inflammation in IRDs have impeded the development of reliable biomarkers and the discovery of new therapeutic targets. Although the involvement of heterogeneous cell populations in the pathogenesis of IRDs has been recognised, the characterisation of these cellular subsets in the peripheral blood of patients has not been studied yet. Mass cytometry, allowing the simultaneous detection of more than 120 different parameters in single-cell resolution, will enable the identification of circulating cell subpopulations that might play a pivotal role in IRDs pathophysiology and their potential use as therapeutic targets.

Background: Cutaneous involvement is common in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and may be essential to the disease activity. This study aimed to describe cutaneous manifestations spectrum and determine the association of cutaneous lesions with the disease activity and systemic involvement among SLE patients in Malang, Indonesia.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using 54 SLE patients from rheumatology outpatient clinic at Saiful Anwar General Hospital Malang, Indonesia. Cutaneous features were classified according to Gilliam and Sontheimer classification of cutaneous lupus. Disease activity and clinical manifestations were documented according to Mexican-SLE disease activity index (Mex-SLEDAI).

Results: Among 54 subjects, 50% of the patients had cutaneous manifestations. Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) was observed in 11.1% of patients, and malar rash in 20.4%. Subjects with cutaneous lesions had significantly higher Mex-SLEDAI scores, especially those who had SCLE (p<0.001), malar rash (p=0.002), alopecia (p=0.002), and photosensitivity (p=0.032). Six patients (11.1%) had skin infections with higher disease activity (9[8-11]vs.2[0-4];p<0.001). SCLE was significantly associated with malar rash (OR 11.7[1.8-76.5]), vasculitis (OR 43.0[4.1-445.6]), and fatigue (OR 15.0[2.1-108.8]). Malar rash was associated with photosensitivity (OR 8.4[1.6-44.0]), while oral or nasal ulcer was associated with fatigue (OR 8.6 [1.4-54.6]). Vasculitis (OR 5.9[1.0-35.1]) and nephritis (OR 11.7 [1.8-76.5]) were associated with the presence of skin infection.

Conclusion: SCLE and malar rash are the most common cutaneous lesions among subjects. Subjects with cutaneous lesions have relatively higher disease activity. Several skin lesions are also associated with SLE patients' systemic manifestations.

Background: The clinical screening of enthesitis and synovitis in patients with psoriasis lacks specificity and sensitivity during the preclinical phase.

Aims: to assess US subclinical synovitis and enthesitis in psoriatic patients compared with healthy controls.

Methods: A cross-sectional study on 40 psoriatic patients and 40 healthy sex- and age-matched controls. US examination of 18 joints was performed along with 22 entheseal sites on the upper and lower limbs. US subscores were established according to the US abnormalities: inflammatory score (tendon thickening, hypoechogenicity, bursitis, Doppler signal), damage score (calcification, enthesophytes, bone erosion) and total score (the sum of inflammatory and damage scores).

Results: US synovitis were more frequent in psoriatic patients (0.68%) than in controls (0.29%), but the difference was not significant. Patients with psoriasis had more US enthesitis (92,5%) compared to controls (40%)(p<0.001). The total number of enthesitis was higher in the psoriatic group (20.90%) compared to controls (4,78%)(p<0.001). There were more US abnormalities in the psoriatic group compared to controls for calcaneal tendon enthesis(p<0.001), distal patellar tendon enthesis(p<0.001) and deep flexor tendons of the finger enthesis(p<0.001). Compared to controls, psoriatic patients had a significantly higher inflammatory score (Mean±SD) (2.85±3.34 versus 0.58±1.17), damage score (3±2.57 versus 0.60±1.41), and total score (5.85±5.20 versus 1.18±2.07) (p < 0.001 each). Patients with scalp psoriasis had more US enthesitis (p=0.020).

Conclusion: Our results indicate that US enthesitis and synovitis are more frequent in patients with psoriasis. Prospective studies with larger sample size are needed to define the contribution of US in predicting the clinical onset of PsA.