Pub Date : 2019-01-01DOI: 10.21096/disegno_2019_1-2kp
P. Kovács
{"title":"Adalékok a hazai designkultúra-tudomány alakulástörténetéhez. Kanonizálási kísérlet","authors":"P. Kovács","doi":"10.21096/disegno_2019_1-2kp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21096/disegno_2019_1-2kp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":33423,"journal":{"name":"Disegno","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81864086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-01-01DOI: 10.21096/disegno_2016_1-2meb-bto
Megan Blissick, B. Orzada
This theoretical paper reviews the motivational factors of design protection legislation on knockoff manufacturing in the United States. Since at least the early 20th Century, U.S. apparel designers have requested design protection legislation. In fact, more than 90 attempts have been made to gain legal recognition and protection for original apparel designs through the U.S. legislative system since 1914. In France, however, from the time of Charles Frederick Worth, rules existed concerning what qualified as couture design, and over the following years, design protection in Europe evolved to continually protect creative design. In contrast, the United States continues to have limited design legislation that fails to protect fashion design. Parties in opposition to increased protection argue that legislation will stifle creativity, whereas parties in support counter that protection will encourage designers to create. This paper proposes the necessity of future research based on Tedmond Wong’s Innovative Design Protection and Piracy Prevention Act (IDPPPA) Game Theory Model to gauge the effect of design protection legislation on apparel manufacturer motivation to knock off designs. While this paper does not test the proposed research, it provides background supported by analysis and synthesis of current facts, data and research literature, and proposes directions of inquiry that may support design protection legislation.
本文对美国仿冒产品外观设计保护立法的动因进行了理论分析。至少从20世纪初开始，美国服装设计师就要求制定外观设计保护法。事实上，自1914年以来，美国已经有90多次试图通过立法体系获得对服装原创设计的法律认可和保护。然而，在法国，从查尔斯·弗雷德里克·沃斯(Charles Frederick Worth)的时代开始，就有了关于什么是高级定制设计的规定，在接下来的几年里，欧洲的设计保护演变为不断保护创意设计。相比之下，美国的设计立法仍然有限，无法保护时装设计。反对增加保护的党派认为，立法将扼杀创造力，而支持的党派则反驳说，保护将鼓励设计师创造。本文基于Tedmond Wong的创新设计保护与盗版预防法案(IDPPPA)博弈论模型，提出了未来研究的必要性，以衡量设计保护立法对服装制造商仿冒设计动机的影响。虽然本文没有测试提出的研究，但它提供了分析和综合当前事实、数据和研究文献的支持背景，并提出了可能支持外观设计保护立法的调查方向。
{"title":"The Effects of Design Protection Legislation on Manufacturer Motivation","authors":"Megan Blissick, B. Orzada","doi":"10.21096/disegno_2016_1-2meb-bto","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21096/disegno_2016_1-2meb-bto","url":null,"abstract":"This theoretical paper reviews the motivational factors of design protection legislation on knockoff manufacturing in the United States. Since at least the early 20th Century, U.S. apparel designers have requested design protection legislation. In fact, more than 90 attempts have been made to gain legal recognition and protection for original apparel designs through the U.S. legislative system since 1914. In France, however, from the time of Charles Frederick Worth, rules existed concerning what qualified as couture design, and over the following years, design protection in Europe evolved to continually protect creative design. In contrast, the United States continues to have limited design legislation that fails to protect fashion design. Parties in opposition to increased protection argue that legislation will stifle creativity, whereas parties in support counter that protection will encourage designers to create. This paper proposes the necessity of future research based on Tedmond Wong’s Innovative Design Protection and Piracy Prevention Act (IDPPPA) Game Theory Model to gauge the effect of design protection legislation on apparel manufacturer motivation to knock off designs. While this paper does not test the proposed research, it provides background supported by analysis and synthesis of current facts, data and research literature, and proposes directions of inquiry that may support design protection legislation.","PeriodicalId":33423,"journal":{"name":"Disegno","volume":"117 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89808686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.21096/disegno_2019_1-2dt
Dénes Tamás
{"title":"Városdesign és identitás: a posztszocialista városok példája","authors":"Dénes Tamás","doi":"10.21096/disegno_2019_1-2dt","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21096/disegno_2019_1-2dt","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":33423,"journal":{"name":"Disegno","volume":"305 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73507121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：