Pub Date : 2019-03-04DOI: 10.1515/9783110651546-012
John Mccumber
{"title":"I Speak, Therefore I am: Hegel on Descartes","authors":"John Mccumber","doi":"10.1515/9783110651546-012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110651546-012","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":338638,"journal":{"name":"Der deutsche Idealismus und die Rationalisten / German Idealism and the Rationalists","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131043056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-03-04DOI: 10.1515/9783110651546-017
W. Vries
{"title":"James Kreines: Reason in the World: Hegel’s Metaphysics and Its Philosophical Appeal","authors":"W. Vries","doi":"10.1515/9783110651546-017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110651546-017","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":338638,"journal":{"name":"Der deutsche Idealismus und die Rationalisten / German Idealism and the Rationalists","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116543384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-03-04DOI: 10.1515/9783110651546-020
Oliver Sensen
{"title":"Jörg Noller: Die Bestimmung des Willens. Zum Problem individueller Freiheit im Ausgang von Kant","authors":"Oliver Sensen","doi":"10.1515/9783110651546-020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110651546-020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":338638,"journal":{"name":"Der deutsche Idealismus und die Rationalisten / German Idealism and the Rationalists","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132975564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-03-04DOI: 10.1515/9783110651546-005
K. Boer
{"title":"Staking Out the Terrain of Pure Reason: Kant’s Critique of Wolffian Metaphysics in Dreams of a Spirit-Seer","authors":"K. Boer","doi":"10.1515/9783110651546-005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110651546-005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":338638,"journal":{"name":"Der deutsche Idealismus und die Rationalisten / German Idealism and the Rationalists","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125246977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-03-04DOI: 10.1515/9783110651546-013
Y. Melamed
In this paper, I study one aspect of the philosophical encounter between Spinoza and Hegel: the question of the reality of time. The precise reconstruction of the debate will require a close examination of Spinoza’s concept of tempus (time) and duratio (duration), and Hegel’s understanding of these notions. Following a presentation of Hegel’s perception of Spinoza as a modern Eleatic, who denies the reality of time, change and plurality, I turn, in the second part, to look closely at Spinoza’s text and show that Hegel was wrong in reading Spinoza as denying the reality of duration and change. Ironically, Hegel’s misreading of Spinoza as denying the reality of duration and change has been compensated for by a reading of Hegel as denying the reality of time by one of Hegel’s most prominent followers, John Ellis McTaggart. I discuss McTaggart’s reading of Hegel’s Logic in the final part of the paper. In diesem Aufsatz wird ein Aspekt der philosophischen Auseinandersetzung von Spinoza und Hegel studiert: die Frage der Realität der Zeit. Die präzise Rekonstruktion benötigt eine Betrachtung von Spinozas Begriffen „Zeit“ (tempus) und „Dauer“ (duratio) und von Hegels Verständnis dieser Begriffe. Hegels These folgend, dass Spinoza ein moderner Eleate ist, der die Realität von Zeit, Veränderung und Vielfalt leugnet, wird im zweiten Teil anhand von Spinozas Text gezeigt, dass Hegel unrecht in der Behauptung hat, dass Spinoza die Realität von Dauer und Veränderung leugnet. Ironischer Weise wird die Spinoza fälschlicher Weise zugeschriebene These der Leugnung von Dauer und Veränderung von einem seiner Nachfolger Hegel selbst unterstellt, nämlich von John Ellis McTaggert. Hiermit beschäftigt sich der letzte Teil des Aufsatzes. “Now the Sirens have a still more fatal weapon than their song, namely their silence” (Kafka, Parables and Paradoxes, pp. 88–89). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783xxxxxx-013
在本文中，我研究了斯宾诺莎和黑格尔哲学相遇的一个方面:时间的实在性问题。要精确地重建这场辩论，就需要仔细研究斯宾诺莎关于时间(tempus)和持续时间(duratio)的概念，以及黑格尔对这些概念的理解。在介绍了黑格尔认为斯宾诺莎是一个否认时间、变化和多样性的现实的现代埃利亚派之后，我在第二部分中转而仔细研究斯宾诺莎的文本，并指出黑格尔错误地将斯宾诺莎解读为否认持续和变化的现实。具有讽刺意味的是，黑格尔对斯宾诺莎的误读否认了持续和变化的真实性，而黑格尔最著名的追随者之一约翰·埃里斯·麦克塔格特却将黑格尔解读为否认了时间的真实性。在本文的最后部分，我将讨论麦克塔格特对黑格尔《逻辑学》的解读。在《哲学研究》一书中，作者对斯宾诺莎和黑格尔进行了深入的研究。Die präzise rekonstrution benötigt eachachtung von Spinozas Begriffen " time "(时间)and " Dauer "(时间)and von hegel Verständnis dieser Begriffe。黑格尔，这些人，斯宾诺莎在现代文学史上，derdie Realität von Zeit, Veränderung und vilelfalt leugnet, derdie zweiten Teil and hand von Spinoza Text gezeigt, derhegel unrecht in derbeuptung hat, derass Spinoza die Realität von Dauer and Veränderung leugnet。哲学家魏斯·斯宾诺莎fälschlicher魏斯·杜尔和Veränderung魏斯·黑格尔的著作，魏斯·埃利斯·麦克塔格特。Hiermit beschäftigt siich der letzte Teil des Aufsatzes。“现在塞壬们有一个比她们的歌声更致命的武器，那就是她们的沉默”(卡夫卡，《寓言与悖论》，第88-89页)。https://doi.org/10.1515/9783xxxxxx-013
{"title":"Hegel, Spinoza, and McTaggart on the Reality of Time","authors":"Y. Melamed","doi":"10.1515/9783110651546-013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110651546-013","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I study one aspect of the philosophical encounter between Spinoza and Hegel: the question of the reality of time. The precise reconstruction of the debate will require a close examination of Spinoza’s concept of tempus (time) and duratio (duration), and Hegel’s understanding of these notions. Following a presentation of Hegel’s perception of Spinoza as a modern Eleatic, who denies the reality of time, change and plurality, I turn, in the second part, to look closely at Spinoza’s text and show that Hegel was wrong in reading Spinoza as denying the reality of duration and change. Ironically, Hegel’s misreading of Spinoza as denying the reality of duration and change has been compensated for by a reading of Hegel as denying the reality of time by one of Hegel’s most prominent followers, John Ellis McTaggart. I discuss McTaggart’s reading of Hegel’s Logic in the final part of the paper. In diesem Aufsatz wird ein Aspekt der philosophischen Auseinandersetzung von Spinoza und Hegel studiert: die Frage der Realität der Zeit. Die präzise Rekonstruktion benötigt eine Betrachtung von Spinozas Begriffen „Zeit“ (tempus) und „Dauer“ (duratio) und von Hegels Verständnis dieser Begriffe. Hegels These folgend, dass Spinoza ein moderner Eleate ist, der die Realität von Zeit, Veränderung und Vielfalt leugnet, wird im zweiten Teil anhand von Spinozas Text gezeigt, dass Hegel unrecht in der Behauptung hat, dass Spinoza die Realität von Dauer und Veränderung leugnet. Ironischer Weise wird die Spinoza fälschlicher Weise zugeschriebene These der Leugnung von Dauer und Veränderung von einem seiner Nachfolger Hegel selbst unterstellt, nämlich von John Ellis McTaggert. Hiermit beschäftigt sich der letzte Teil des Aufsatzes. “Now the Sirens have a still more fatal weapon than their song, namely their silence” (Kafka, Parables and Paradoxes, pp. 88–89). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783xxxxxx-013","PeriodicalId":338638,"journal":{"name":"Der deutsche Idealismus und die Rationalisten / German Idealism and the Rationalists","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121664617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-03-04DOI: 10.1515/9783110651546-007
Anja Jauernig
: This essay examines some of the ways in which the assumption of the essential finitude of the human mind, in contrast to the infinitude of God’s mind, bears on Leibniz’s and Kant’s accounts of our representational capacities. This examination reveals several underappreciated similarities between their views, but also some notable differences that help us to pinpoint where and in what ways Kant departs from his celebrated predecessor. The fruits of this examination are a better understanding of Kant’s conception of the discursivity of our understanding, his account of the difference between concepts and intuitions, and the particular flavor of his idealism.
{"title":"Finite Minds and Their Representations in Leibniz and Kant","authors":"Anja Jauernig","doi":"10.1515/9783110651546-007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110651546-007","url":null,"abstract":": This essay examines some of the ways in which the assumption of the essential finitude of the human mind, in contrast to the infinitude of God’s mind, bears on Leibniz’s and Kant’s accounts of our representational capacities. This examination reveals several underappreciated similarities between their views, but also some notable differences that help us to pinpoint where and in what ways Kant departs from his celebrated predecessor. The fruits of this examination are a better understanding of Kant’s conception of the discursivity of our understanding, his account of the difference between concepts and intuitions, and the particular flavor of his idealism.","PeriodicalId":338638,"journal":{"name":"Der deutsche Idealismus und die Rationalisten / German Idealism and the Rationalists","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133321743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-03-04DOI: 10.1515/9783110651546-019
Franz Knappik
{"title":"Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: The Science of Logic. Übersetzt und herausgegeben von George di Giovanni","authors":"Franz Knappik","doi":"10.1515/9783110651546-019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110651546-019","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":338638,"journal":{"name":"Der deutsche Idealismus und die Rationalisten / German Idealism and the Rationalists","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126308440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-03-04DOI: 10.1515/9783110651546-016
Jane Kneller
{"title":"Novalis, Spinoza and the Realization of Nature","authors":"Jane Kneller","doi":"10.1515/9783110651546-016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110651546-016","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":338638,"journal":{"name":"Der deutsche Idealismus und die Rationalisten / German Idealism and the Rationalists","volume":"253 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134382009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.1515/9783110651546-008
P. Ziche
It is essential for the Kantian programme that it can develop principles for the seeking and finding of knowledge. This requires Kant to combine the openness that is required for discovering genuinely novel knowledge with the necessity provided by principles. This combination of extreme methodological openness with strong principles should add to our understanding of Kant’s position vis-a-vis empiricism and rationalism. It will be shown that Kant indeed develops an open methodology that is intended to give direction to our cognitive practices without determining their results. This implies a revision of the standard understanding of ideas of reason in their regulative use: Kant’s imagery of “horizons” and “mirrors” suggests that, in principle, all concepts can function as regulative ideas. In the absence of clear ways of categorizing philosophers as either ‘empiricists’ or ‘rationalists’ in Kant’s period, these methodological issues help consolidate our picture of how Kant positions himself within the field of options that became labelled by these terms.
{"title":"Epistemic Confidence – Kant’s Rationalization of the Principles of Seeking and Finding","authors":"P. Ziche","doi":"10.1515/9783110651546-008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110651546-008","url":null,"abstract":"It is essential for the Kantian programme that it can develop principles for the seeking and finding of knowledge. This requires Kant to combine the openness that is required for discovering genuinely novel knowledge with the necessity provided by principles. This combination of extreme methodological openness with strong principles should add to our understanding of Kant’s position vis-a-vis empiricism and rationalism. It will be shown that Kant indeed develops an open methodology that is intended to give direction to our cognitive practices without determining their results. This implies a revision of the standard understanding of ideas of reason in their regulative use: Kant’s imagery of “horizons” and “mirrors” suggests that, in principle, all concepts can function as regulative ideas. In the absence of clear ways of categorizing philosophers as either ‘empiricists’ or ‘rationalists’ in Kant’s period, these methodological issues help consolidate our picture of how Kant positions himself within the field of options that became labelled by these terms.","PeriodicalId":338638,"journal":{"name":"Der deutsche Idealismus und die Rationalisten / German Idealism and the Rationalists","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126933133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.1515/9783110651546-014
D. Heidemann
{"title":"Hegel: Ein Rationalist?","authors":"D. Heidemann","doi":"10.1515/9783110651546-014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110651546-014","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":338638,"journal":{"name":"Der deutsche Idealismus und die Rationalisten / German Idealism and the Rationalists","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133457242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：