Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/44-64
Y. Borinshtein
{"title":"PHILOSOPHY OF MONEY AS THE BASIS FOR FORMING A MODERN SUCCESSFUL MAN","authors":"Y. Borinshtein","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/44-64","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/44-64","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":339216,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL CHALLENGES OF THE STUDY OF MODERN SOCIETY","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122864590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/237-255
Yu. S. Yushkevych
ing from the purely instrumental aspect of this issue determines the expediency of not only recognizing the mutual influence of the economy and culture, but also determines the need to interpret the economy as a culture. According to A. A. Pogrebnyak and D. E. Raskov, an economy that is part of a person’s cultural activity, which requires a search for a new vision of its subject field, will help to overcome the isolation of economic theory from moral, historical, social and even metaphysical contexts. Culture has a meaning-forming content. It refers to the fact that it is transcendental to the field of meanings of any abstract system that represents this or that nature, in particular economic relations, but is immanent to human existence in its specificity. In an economy that is viewed through the prism of culture, the subject is no longer a fixed agent that obeys certain objective laws. It is understood in the open historical horizon of continuous self-determination, within the framework of which standard economic goals are not something that certainly matters, but that always participates in the problematization of own meaning 6 . Returning to the question of determining the essence of the concept of “economic culture”, it should be noted that the conceptual analysis of the existing definitions allows us to conclude that this concept is distinguished by the multivariate approaches to its study. This is the result of the multifaceted nature of this phenomenon. Spiritual and material, subjective and objective, individual and social, internal and external, and so on are related in it. Relevant is the approach according to which, the cognitive, axiological and praxiological components are thought primarily in this concept. The cognitive element is a combination of knowledge and ideas that reflect various aspects of economic reality and form 6 Погребняк А. А., Расков Д. Е. Экономика как культура: возвращение к «спору о методах». Общественные науки и современность. 2013. No 2. С. 101.
从纯粹的工具角度来看待这个问题，不仅决定了承认经济和文化相互影响的权宜之计，而且决定了将经济解释为文化的必要性。根据a . a . Pogrebnyak和D. E. Raskov的观点，经济作为一个人的文化活动的一部分，需要寻找其主题领域的新视野，这将有助于克服经济理论与道德、历史、社会甚至形而上学背景的孤立。文化具有形成意义的内容。它指的是这样一个事实，即它对任何代表这种或那种性质的抽象系统的意义领域都是先验的，特别是经济关系，但在其特殊性中，它是人类存在的内在。在透过文化棱镜观察的经济中，主体不再是遵循某些客观规律的固定主体。它是在持续自决的开放历史视野中被理解的，在这个框架内，标准的经济目标并不是一定重要的东西，但它总是参与自身意义的问题化。回到确定“经济文化”概念本质的问题上，应该指出的是，对现有定义的概念分析使我们能够得出结论，这一概念的特点是研究它的多元方法。这是这一现象多面性的结果。精神与物质、主观与客观、个人与社会、内在与外在等等都在其中相互联系。相关的是，根据该方法，认知，价值论和行为学的组成部分主要是在这个概念中被思考的。认知因素是知识和思想的结合，反映了经济现实和形式6 Погребняк А的各个方面。А。， Расков Д。Е。Экономикакаккультура:возвращениек«споруометодах»。Общественные науки * современность。2013. 没有2。С。101.
{"title":"ECONOMIC CULTURE IN THE CONTEMPORARY ERA: SOCIO-PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECT","authors":"Yu. S. Yushkevych","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/237-255","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/237-255","url":null,"abstract":"ing from the purely instrumental aspect of this issue determines the expediency of not only recognizing the mutual influence of the economy and culture, but also determines the need to interpret the economy as a culture. According to A. A. Pogrebnyak and D. E. Raskov, an economy that is part of a person’s cultural activity, which requires a search for a new vision of its subject field, will help to overcome the isolation of economic theory from moral, historical, social and even metaphysical contexts. Culture has a meaning-forming content. It refers to the fact that it is transcendental to the field of meanings of any abstract system that represents this or that nature, in particular economic relations, but is immanent to human existence in its specificity. In an economy that is viewed through the prism of culture, the subject is no longer a fixed agent that obeys certain objective laws. It is understood in the open historical horizon of continuous self-determination, within the framework of which standard economic goals are not something that certainly matters, but that always participates in the problematization of own meaning 6 . Returning to the question of determining the essence of the concept of “economic culture”, it should be noted that the conceptual analysis of the existing definitions allows us to conclude that this concept is distinguished by the multivariate approaches to its study. This is the result of the multifaceted nature of this phenomenon. Spiritual and material, subjective and objective, individual and social, internal and external, and so on are related in it. Relevant is the approach according to which, the cognitive, axiological and praxiological components are thought primarily in this concept. The cognitive element is a combination of knowledge and ideas that reflect various aspects of economic reality and form 6 Погребняк А. А., Расков Д. Е. Экономика как культура: возвращение к «спору о методах». Общественные науки и современность. 2013. No 2. С. 101.","PeriodicalId":339216,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL CHALLENGES OF THE STUDY OF MODERN SOCIETY","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129597829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/129-148
V. V. Okorokova
INTRODUCTION Every cultural-historical era is characterized by certain mental attitudes, mental constructions and ideas that form the image of social reality. The latter determines man’s place in social space, his attitude to the world around him, and most importantly, his knowledge. It is through cognitive abilities in the human mind the images are formed and they are the basis of the social ideal, social reality, prognostic orientation of comprehension of social existence. Consciousness as a way of reflecting and understanding reality acts as a way of human existence. To explain various phenomena, both to himself and to others, man seeks to use the most understandable definitions and comparisons. Within the framework of social system, general concepts appear about general and regular causes of events; this, in turn, contributes to the formation of mass consciousness of people. This is an important circumstance, since myth is one of the ways of perceiving reality; it is a form of reflection/construction in the consciousness of reality. The point is that mythological consciousness has the power to construct from the fragments, chaos of the external world of impressions, an integral picture of the world, determining the style of thinking and the way people exist in this world. In all historical times, human consciousness contained mythological components (images, symbols, beliefs, convictions, prejudices) of all value levels and strata existing in a given culture. This is the basis of any sociocultural phenomenon, the basis of all forms of being, perceived by man as the only possible reality. It can be said that myth is an idealized, valuably and emotionally colored “mark” of reality, the existence of which is vital to the structure of human consciousness 1 .
{"title":"MYTHOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF SOCIETY VIRTUALIZATION","authors":"V. V. Okorokova","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/129-148","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/129-148","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Every cultural-historical era is characterized by certain mental attitudes, mental constructions and ideas that form the image of social reality. The latter determines man’s place in social space, his attitude to the world around him, and most importantly, his knowledge. It is through cognitive abilities in the human mind the images are formed and they are the basis of the social ideal, social reality, prognostic orientation of comprehension of social existence. Consciousness as a way of reflecting and understanding reality acts as a way of human existence. To explain various phenomena, both to himself and to others, man seeks to use the most understandable definitions and comparisons. Within the framework of social system, general concepts appear about general and regular causes of events; this, in turn, contributes to the formation of mass consciousness of people. This is an important circumstance, since myth is one of the ways of perceiving reality; it is a form of reflection/construction in the consciousness of reality. The point is that mythological consciousness has the power to construct from the fragments, chaos of the external world of impressions, an integral picture of the world, determining the style of thinking and the way people exist in this world. In all historical times, human consciousness contained mythological components (images, symbols, beliefs, convictions, prejudices) of all value levels and strata existing in a given culture. This is the basis of any sociocultural phenomenon, the basis of all forms of being, perceived by man as the only possible reality. It can be said that myth is an idealized, valuably and emotionally colored “mark” of reality, the existence of which is vital to the structure of human consciousness 1 .","PeriodicalId":339216,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL CHALLENGES OF THE STUDY OF MODERN SOCIETY","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125350841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/191-215
H. Shypunov, M. Prokop
{"title":"ANTHROPOLOGICAL AND INSTITUTIONAL GROUNDS FOR REALISATION OF POLITICAL FREEDOM IN THE CONTEXT OF UKRAINIAN NATIONAL GENESIS: HISTORICAL, POLITICAL AND SOCIAL BACKGROUND","authors":"H. Shypunov, M. Prokop","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/191-215","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/191-215","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":339216,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL CHALLENGES OF THE STUDY OF MODERN SOCIETY","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121801439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/149-167
I. Orlenko
{"title":"PHILOSOPHICAL UNDERPINNINGSOF THE CONCEPT OF SOCIAL MALADJUSTMENT IN THE MODERN WORLD","authors":"I. Orlenko","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/149-167","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/149-167","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":339216,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL CHALLENGES OF THE STUDY OF MODERN SOCIETY","volume":"2015 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127655171","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/1-21
T. Andrushchenko, V. Melnyk
{"title":"TOLERANCE AS AN AXIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE OF NONVIOLENT ACTION IN TRANSITIONAL DEMOCRACIES","authors":"T. Andrushchenko, V. Melnyk","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/1-21","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/1-21","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":339216,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL CHALLENGES OF THE STUDY OF MODERN SOCIETY","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126366870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/168-190
S. Romanenko
{"title":"THE PROBLEM OF INDIVIDUAL’S BIOSOCIAL INTEGRITY AS AN OBJECT OF PHILOSOPHICAL STUDY","authors":"S. Romanenko","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/168-190","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/168-190","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":339216,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL CHALLENGES OF THE STUDY OF MODERN SOCIETY","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122698865","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/65-86
Y. Dobrolyubska
INTRODUCTION The idea of inter-paradigm synthesis in the philosophy of history is still new and has not received a thorough justification in the scientific literature. Its setting can be found in some papers that discuss aspects of interdisciplinarity in historical science and the problems of historiographic synthesis. In this regard, its needed to highlight the works of the classics of French historical school “Annals” and A.Ya. Gurevich, O.M. Medushevskoyi, L.P. Repinoi, J. Tosha and some other authors. They lay the foundations of interdisciplinary cooperation in the field of social and humanitarian cognition (J. Tosh), discussing the topic of “historical synthesis” (A.Ya. Gurevich), “bridges” are built between traditional historiography and the latest epistemological “calls” of the philosophy of postmodernism (L.P. Repina). However, in whole, the question of whether it is possible, in the context of methodological pluralism, to reduce different cognitive practices to some discursive types or models, as well as to distinguish between each of them the standards of science inherent in each of them.
历史哲学中范式间综合的概念仍然是一个新概念，在科学文献中还没有得到充分的证明。它的设置可以在一些讨论历史科学跨学科方面和史学综合问题的论文中找到。在这方面，有必要突出法国历史学派的经典著作《编年史》和阿雅。Gurevich, O.M. Medushevskoyi, L.P. Repinoi, J. Tosha和其他一些作者。他们在社会和人道主义认知领域奠定了跨学科合作的基础(J. Tosh)，讨论了“历史综合”的话题(A.Ya;在传统史学和后现代主义哲学最新的认识论“呼唤”(L.P. Repina)之间架起了“桥梁”。然而，总的来说，在方法论多元主义的背景下，是否有可能将不同的认知实践简化为一些话语类型或模式，以及区分它们各自内在的科学标准。
{"title":"THE COGNITIVE STRATEGY OF POST-NEOCLASSICAL PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORY","authors":"Y. Dobrolyubska","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/65-86","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/65-86","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION The idea of inter-paradigm synthesis in the philosophy of history is still new and has not received a thorough justification in the scientific literature. Its setting can be found in some papers that discuss aspects of interdisciplinarity in historical science and the problems of historiographic synthesis. In this regard, its needed to highlight the works of the classics of French historical school “Annals” and A.Ya. Gurevich, O.M. Medushevskoyi, L.P. Repinoi, J. Tosha and some other authors. They lay the foundations of interdisciplinary cooperation in the field of social and humanitarian cognition (J. Tosh), discussing the topic of “historical synthesis” (A.Ya. Gurevich), “bridges” are built between traditional historiography and the latest epistemological “calls” of the philosophy of postmodernism (L.P. Repina). However, in whole, the question of whether it is possible, in the context of methodological pluralism, to reduce different cognitive practices to some discursive types or models, as well as to distinguish between each of them the standards of science inherent in each of them.","PeriodicalId":339216,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL CHALLENGES OF THE STUDY OF MODERN SOCIETY","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123946338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/216-236
A. Synytsia
{"title":"RECEPTION OF M. HEIDEGGER’S LEGACY IN ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY","authors":"A. Synytsia","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/216-236","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/216-236","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":339216,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL CHALLENGES OF THE STUDY OF MODERN SOCIETY","volume":"243 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132558904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/22-43
Z. Atamaniuk
{"title":"THE GLOBALIZATION AND FREEDOM OF PERSONALITY: THE SOCIO-PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECT","authors":"Z. Atamaniuk","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/22-43","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-144-5/22-43","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":339216,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL CHALLENGES OF THE STUDY OF MODERN SOCIETY","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131896724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：