{"title":"Rights of Public Employees","authors":"","doi":"10.4324/9780429038129-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429038129-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":348910,"journal":{"name":"Intellect and Craft","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124367379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-04-18DOI: 10.4324/9780429038129-13
{"title":"Rights in the Criminal Justice System","authors":"","doi":"10.4324/9780429038129-13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429038129-13","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":348910,"journal":{"name":"Intellect and Craft","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115651487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"When Initiative Lawmaking Is Not “Republican Government”: The Campaign Against Homosexuality","authors":"","doi":"10.4324/9780429038129-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429038129-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":348910,"journal":{"name":"Intellect and Craft","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114375198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Constitutional Rights in the Public Sector: Justice Douglas on Freedom in the Welfare State","authors":"","doi":"10.4324/9780429038129-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429038129-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":348910,"journal":{"name":"Intellect and Craft","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134330464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-04-18DOI: 10.4324/9780429038129-10
Ken I. Kersch
{"title":"Freedom of Speech","authors":"Ken I. Kersch","doi":"10.4324/9780429038129-10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429038129-10","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":348910,"journal":{"name":"Intellect and Craft","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130850147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Are State Constitutions Common Law?*","authors":"","doi":"10.4324/9780429038129-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429038129-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":348910,"journal":{"name":"Intellect and Craft","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122144333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In reviewing contemporary criticism of the constitutional decisions of the Supreme Court during the tenure of Chief Justice Earl Warren, Judge J. Skelly Wright1 characterized as the "scholarly tradition" a way of thinking about constitutional law that he found exemplified by the early Oliver Wendell Holmes lectures, the Harvard Law Review's annual Supreme Court forewords, and particularly the recent writings of Professor Alexander Bickel and Professor Philip B. Kurland.2 The judge's critique of the critics raises the question whether the criteria of this "scholarly tradition" are the proper measure either of constitutional law or of the performance of the Supreme Court. Characteristically, questions of constitutional law and questions of the role of the Supreme Court are generally treated as the same thing. This faithfully reflects the tradition of two generations of legal realism -the common core of tradition shared by most scholarship and most appellate judging today. The identity between the law in operation and the role of courts is a premise first year students absorb in such time-hallowed epigrams as Holmes's definition of law as a prophecy of what a court will do in fact,3 and Hughes's "the Constitution is what the judges say it is." 4 It is "the realist school of jurisprudence to which both sides of the alleged controversy over the Warren Court pretend to adhere" wrote Kurland,3 and Bickel devoted a brilliant opening chapter of The Supreme Court and the Idea of Progress to sketching the intellectual and political ascendancy of the "Progressive Realists" in constitutional law.0 But there is more to the scholarly tradition of legal realism than a facile derivation of law from the judicial function. Never a closely
在回顾首席大法官厄尔·沃伦(Earl Warren)任期内对最高法院宪法判决的当代批评时，j·斯凯利·赖特(J. Skelly wright)法官1将一种思考宪法的方式描述为“学术传统”，他发现这种方式在奥利弗·温德尔·霍姆斯(Oliver Wendell Holmes)早期的讲座、《哈佛法律评论》(Harvard law Review)的年度最高法院前言中得到了体现，特别是亚历山大·比克尔教授和菲利普·b·库兰德教授最近的著作。2法官对批评者的批评提出了这样一个问题:这种“学术传统”的标准是否是衡量宪法或最高法院表现的适当标准。典型的是，宪法问题和最高法院的角色问题通常被视为同一件事。这忠实地反映了两代法律现实主义的传统——今天大多数学术和大多数上诉法官所共有的传统的共同核心。法律的运行和法院的作用之间的同一性是第一年的学生在这些古老的警句中吸收的前提，如福尔摩斯将法律定义为法院行为的预言，以及休斯的“宪法是法官所说的”。库兰写道，这是“法理学的现实主义学派，所谓的沃伦法院争议的双方都假装坚持这一学派”，比克尔在《最高法院与进步的理念》一书中用了一个精彩的开篇章节，描绘了“进步现实主义者”在宪法中的智力和政治优势但是，法律现实主义的学术传统不仅仅是简单地从司法职能中推导出法律。从来没有接近过
{"title":"Judges, Critics, and the Realist Tradition","authors":"O. Holmes","doi":"10.4324/9780429038129-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429038129-3","url":null,"abstract":"In reviewing contemporary criticism of the constitutional decisions of the Supreme Court during the tenure of Chief Justice Earl Warren, Judge J. Skelly Wright1 characterized as the \"scholarly tradition\" a way of thinking about constitutional law that he found exemplified by the early Oliver Wendell Holmes lectures, the Harvard Law Review's annual Supreme Court forewords, and particularly the recent writings of Professor Alexander Bickel and Professor Philip B. Kurland.2 The judge's critique of the critics raises the question whether the criteria of this \"scholarly tradition\" are the proper measure either of constitutional law or of the performance of the Supreme Court. Characteristically, questions of constitutional law and questions of the role of the Supreme Court are generally treated as the same thing. This faithfully reflects the tradition of two generations of legal realism -the common core of tradition shared by most scholarship and most appellate judging today. The identity between the law in operation and the role of courts is a premise first year students absorb in such time-hallowed epigrams as Holmes's definition of law as a prophecy of what a court will do in fact,3 and Hughes's \"the Constitution is what the judges say it is.\" 4 It is \"the realist school of jurisprudence to which both sides of the alleged controversy over the Warren Court pretend to adhere\" wrote Kurland,3 and Bickel devoted a brilliant opening chapter of The Supreme Court and the Idea of Progress to sketching the intellectual and political ascendancy of the \"Progressive Realists\" in constitutional law.0 But there is more to the scholarly tradition of legal realism than a facile derivation of law from the judicial function. Never a closely","PeriodicalId":348910,"journal":{"name":"Intellect and Craft","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123557775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-04-18DOI: 10.4324/9780429038129-14
{"title":"Judicial Power and Government Structure","authors":"","doi":"10.4324/9780429038129-14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429038129-14","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":348910,"journal":{"name":"Intellect and Craft","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123443642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Due Process of Lawmaking","authors":"H. Linde","doi":"10.4324/9780429038129-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429038129-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":348910,"journal":{"name":"Intellect and Craft","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114903250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"“A Republic . . . If You Can Keep It.”","authors":"H. Linde","doi":"10.4324/9780429038129-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429038129-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":348910,"journal":{"name":"Intellect and Craft","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131621624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：