The diagnosis of acute myocardial injury requires a rise and/or fall of cardiac troponin (cTn) on serial testing, with at least one concentration above the 99th percentile value of a normal reference population according to the recently published Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction.1 However, the magnitude of change in cTn that constitutes a significant rise and/or fall was again not specified in detail. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays can measure ten-fold lower concentrations of cTn with more precision than older assays, and can accurately quantify cTn in more than 50% of healthy individuals with a coefficient of variation of less than 10% at the 99th percentile. These hs-cTn assays are also able to detect the normal variations in cTn results that are due to biological variability. Understanding and quantifying the normal variations in cTn is important as this would allow significant changes to be better defined. Numerous studies have sought to investigate the biological variability of cTn over the last ten years. Such studies are usually conducted in healthy individuals, however individuals with chronic cardiac disease or chronic renal failure have also been examined. These studies have yielded varying results in regards to significant change values for cTn. In light of the recent redefinition for myocardial infarction, the purpose of this mini-review is to revisit the biological variability of cTn. In particular, we outline concepts for determining a significant change value, review the results of previous studies on the biological variation of cTn and discuss potential considerations for clinical practice.
{"title":"Revisiting the Biological Variability of Cardiac Troponin: Implications for Clinical Practice.","authors":"Nick S R Lan, Damon A Bell","doi":"10.33176/AACB-19-00032","DOIUrl":"10.33176/AACB-19-00032","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The diagnosis of acute myocardial injury requires a rise and/or fall of cardiac troponin (cTn) on serial testing, with at least one concentration above the 99<sup>th</sup> percentile value of a normal reference population according to the recently published <i>Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction</i>.1 However, the magnitude of change in cTn that constitutes a significant rise and/or fall was again not specified in detail. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays can measure ten-fold lower concentrations of cTn with more precision than older assays, and can accurately quantify cTn in more than 50% of healthy individuals with a coefficient of variation of less than 10% at the 99<sup>th</sup> percentile. These hs-cTn assays are also able to detect the normal variations in cTn results that are due to biological variability. Understanding and quantifying the normal variations in cTn is important as this would allow significant changes to be better defined. Numerous studies have sought to investigate the biological variability of cTn over the last ten years. Such studies are usually conducted in healthy individuals, however individuals with chronic cardiac disease or chronic renal failure have also been examined. These studies have yielded varying results in regards to significant change values for cTn. In light of the recent redefinition for myocardial infarction, the purpose of this mini-review is to revisit the biological variability of cTn. In particular, we outline concepts for determining a significant change value, review the results of previous studies on the biological variation of cTn and discuss potential considerations for clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":34924,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biochemist Reviews","volume":"40 4","pages":"201-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6892703/pdf/cbr-40-201.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37475015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Superwarfarins are long-acting anticoagulant rodenticides developed from warfarin. The mechanism of action is by inhibition of vitamin K epoxide reductase, resulting in the inability of the body to recycle vitamin K. Deficiency of vitamin K thereafter leads to inability for the body to synthesise vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors, factor II, VII, IX, and X, leading to prolonged prothrombin time. Due to the bulky aromatic sidechains, superwarfarins have a much longer half-life when compared to warfarin, and exposure to superwarfarins results in a prolonged period of anticoagulation which can result in clinical bleeding. Diagnosis is straightforward in patients with known history of superwarfarin exposure but has proved difficult for patients who did not report superwarfarin intake. Superwarfarin poisoning should therefore be suspected in all patients with unexplained prolongation of prothrombin time, and can be confirmed by their detection in serum. Treatment for superwarfarin poisoning includes rapid correction of factor deficiencies with either 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate or fresh frozen plasma in patients with active bleeding, and high dose vitamin K therapy given multiple times per day for a prolonged period of weeks to months.
超华法林是从华法林发展而来的长效抗凝血灭鼠剂。其作用机制是通过抑制维生素 K 环氧化物还原酶,导致机体无法循环利用维生素 K。缺乏维生素 K 会导致机体无法合成依赖维生素 K 的凝血因子 II、VII、IX 和 X,从而导致凝血酶原时间延长。与华法林相比,超级华法林由于含有笨重的芳香族侧链,半衰期要长得多,接触超级华法林会导致抗凝时间延长,从而导致临床出血。对于已知有超华法林接触史的患者来说,诊断非常简单,但对于没有报告摄入超华法林的患者来说,诊断却很困难。因此,对于所有原因不明的凝血酶原时间延长的患者,都应怀疑超华素中毒,并可通过在血清中检测到超华素来确诊。治疗超华素中毒的方法包括用 4 因子凝血酶原复合物浓缩物或新鲜冰冻血浆快速纠正活动性出血患者的因子缺乏症,以及每天多次、持续数周至数月的大剂量维生素 K 治疗。
{"title":"Superwarfarin (Long-Acting Anticoagulant Rodenticides) Poisoning: from Pathophysiology to Laboratory-Guided Clinical Management.","authors":"Yeow-Kuan Chong, Tony Wing-Lai Mak","doi":"10.33176/AACB-19-00029","DOIUrl":"10.33176/AACB-19-00029","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Superwarfarins are long-acting anticoagulant rodenticides developed from warfarin. The mechanism of action is by inhibition of vitamin K epoxide reductase, resulting in the inability of the body to recycle vitamin K. Deficiency of vitamin K thereafter leads to inability for the body to synthesise vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors, factor II, VII, IX, and X, leading to prolonged prothrombin time. Due to the bulky aromatic sidechains, superwarfarins have a much longer half-life when compared to warfarin, and exposure to superwarfarins results in a prolonged period of anticoagulation which can result in clinical bleeding. Diagnosis is straightforward in patients with known history of superwarfarin exposure but has proved difficult for patients who did not report superwarfarin intake. Superwarfarin poisoning should therefore be suspected in all patients with unexplained prolongation of prothrombin time, and can be confirmed by their detection in serum. Treatment for superwarfarin poisoning includes rapid correction of factor deficiencies with either 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate or fresh frozen plasma in patients with active bleeding, and high dose vitamin K therapy given multiple times per day for a prolonged period of weeks to months.</p>","PeriodicalId":34924,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biochemist Reviews","volume":"40 4","pages":"175-185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6892705/pdf/cbr-40-175.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37475081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Reference intervals are relied upon by clinicians when interpreting their patients' test results. Therefore, laboratorians directly contribute to patient care when they report accurate reference intervals. The traditional approach to establishing reference intervals is to perform a study on healthy volunteers. However, the practical aspects of the staff time and cost required to perform these studies make this approach difficult for clinical laboratories to routinely use. Indirect methods for deriving reference intervals, which utilise patient results stored in the laboratory's database, provide an alternative approach that is quick and inexpensive to perform. Additionally, because large amounts of patient data can be used, the approach can provide more detailed reference interval information when multiple partitions are required, such as with different age-groups. However, if the indirect approach is to be used to derive accurate reference intervals, several considerations need to be addressed. The laboratorian must assess whether the assay and patient population were stable over the study period, whether data 'clean-up' steps should be used prior to data analysis and, often, how the distribution of values from healthy individuals should be modelled. The assumptions and potential pitfalls of the particular indirect technique chosen for data analysis also need to be considered. A comprehensive understanding of all aspects of the indirect approach to establishing reference intervals allows the laboratorian to harness the power of the data stored in their laboratory database and ensure the reference intervals they report are accurate.
{"title":"Indirect Reference Intervals: Harnessing the Power of Stored Laboratory Data.","authors":"Christopher-John L Farrell, Lan Nguyen","doi":"10.33176/AACB-19-00022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33176/AACB-19-00022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reference intervals are relied upon by clinicians when interpreting their patients' test results. Therefore, laboratorians directly contribute to patient care when they report accurate reference intervals. The traditional approach to establishing reference intervals is to perform a study on healthy volunteers. However, the practical aspects of the staff time and cost required to perform these studies make this approach difficult for clinical laboratories to routinely use. Indirect methods for deriving reference intervals, which utilise patient results stored in the laboratory's database, provide an alternative approach that is quick and inexpensive to perform. Additionally, because large amounts of patient data can be used, the approach can provide more detailed reference interval information when multiple partitions are required, such as with different age-groups. However, if the indirect approach is to be used to derive accurate reference intervals, several considerations need to be addressed. The laboratorian must assess whether the assay and patient population were stable over the study period, whether data 'clean-up' steps should be used prior to data analysis and, often, how the distribution of values from healthy individuals should be modelled. The assumptions and potential pitfalls of the particular indirect technique chosen for data analysis also need to be considered. A comprehensive understanding of all aspects of the indirect approach to establishing reference intervals allows the laboratorian to harness the power of the data stored in their laboratory database and ensure the reference intervals they report are accurate.</p>","PeriodicalId":34924,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biochemist Reviews","volume":"40 2","pages":"99-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6544248/pdf/cbr-40-99.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37334062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tirsa T van Duijl, L Renee Ruhaak, Johan W de Fijter, Christa M Cobbaert
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication in hospitalised patients and is diagnosed by urinary output and serum creatinine. Serum creatinine is an indirect marker for renal glomerular filtration, but lacks specificity for damage to kidney tissue and the relatively late response to injury precludes early recognition of AKI. Timely diagnosis of kidney injury using biomarkers that provide information about the aetiology of kidney injury is an unmet clinical need. To overcome the suboptimal performance of serum creatinine, injury biomarkers have been proposed that predict AKI in diverse clinical settings. The clinical performance of these markers is considered moderate due to the lack of specificity for kidney tissue or the underlying injury mechanisms, poor test specificity and confounding by interventions or comorbidities. Hence, it is not unequivocally beneficial to implement current kidney injury biomarkers in the clinical laboratory for diagnostic purposes. In this article we review biomarkers that might fulfil AKI-related unmet clinical needs in the academic hospital setting.
{"title":"Kidney Injury Biomarkers in an Academic Hospital Setting: Where Are We Now?","authors":"Tirsa T van Duijl, L Renee Ruhaak, Johan W de Fijter, Christa M Cobbaert","doi":"10.33176/AACB-18-00017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33176/AACB-18-00017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication in hospitalised patients and is diagnosed by urinary output and serum creatinine. Serum creatinine is an indirect marker for renal glomerular filtration, but lacks specificity for damage to kidney tissue and the relatively late response to injury precludes early recognition of AKI. Timely diagnosis of kidney injury using biomarkers that provide information about the aetiology of kidney injury is an unmet clinical need. To overcome the suboptimal performance of serum creatinine, injury biomarkers have been proposed that predict AKI in diverse clinical settings. The clinical performance of these markers is considered moderate due to the lack of specificity for kidney tissue or the underlying injury mechanisms, poor test specificity and confounding by interventions or comorbidities. Hence, it is not unequivocally beneficial to implement current kidney injury biomarkers in the clinical laboratory for diagnostic purposes. In this article we review biomarkers that might fulfil AKI-related unmet clinical needs in the academic hospital setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":34924,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biochemist Reviews","volume":"40 2","pages":"79-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.33176/AACB-18-00017","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37334061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Wilson disease (WD) is an autosomal recessively-inherited disorder of copper metabolism and characterised by a pathological accumulation of copper. The ATP7B gene encodes for a transmembrane copper transporter essential for biliary copper excretion. Depending on time of diagnosis, severity of disease can vary widely. Almost all patients show evidence of progressive liver disease. Neurological impairments or psychiatric symptoms are common in WD patients not diagnosed during adolescence. WD is a treatable disorder, and early treatment can prevent the development of symptoms in patients diagnosed while still asymptomatic. This is why the early diagnosis of WD is crucial. The diagnosis is based on clinical symptoms, abnormal measures of copper metabolism and DNA analysis. Available treatment includes chelators and zinc salts which increase copper excretion and reduce copper uptake. In severe cases, liver transplantation is indicated and accomplishes a phenotypic correction of the hepatic gene defect. Recently, clinical development of the new copper modulating agent tetrathiomolybdate has started and direct genetic therapies are being tested in animal models. The following review focuses especially on biochemical markers and how they can be utilised in diagnosis and drug monitoring.
{"title":"Biochemical Markers for the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Wilson Disease.","authors":"Isabelle Mohr, Karl Heinz Weiss","doi":"10.33176/AACB-18-00014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33176/AACB-18-00014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wilson disease (WD) is an autosomal recessively-inherited disorder of copper metabolism and characterised by a pathological accumulation of copper. The <i>ATP7B</i> gene encodes for a transmembrane copper transporter essential for biliary copper excretion. Depending on time of diagnosis, severity of disease can vary widely. Almost all patients show evidence of progressive liver disease. Neurological impairments or psychiatric symptoms are common in WD patients not diagnosed during adolescence. WD is a treatable disorder, and early treatment can prevent the development of symptoms in patients diagnosed while still asymptomatic. This is why the early diagnosis of WD is crucial. The diagnosis is based on clinical symptoms, abnormal measures of copper metabolism and DNA analysis. Available treatment includes chelators and zinc salts which increase copper excretion and reduce copper uptake. In severe cases, liver transplantation is indicated and accomplishes a phenotypic correction of the hepatic gene defect. Recently, clinical development of the new copper modulating agent tetrathiomolybdate has started and direct genetic therapies are being tested in animal models. The following review focuses especially on biochemical markers and how they can be utilised in diagnosis and drug monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":34924,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biochemist Reviews","volume":"40 2","pages":"59-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.33176/AACB-18-00014","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37334060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jillian R Tate, Joel D Smith, Nilika Wijeratne, Peter Mollee
It is apparent that there is a need for greater harmonisation of the reporting and quantification of paraproteins on protein electrophoresis with the introduction of the electronic health record and recent survey findings indicating ongoing areas of heterogeneity on serum protein electrophoresis. The proposed addendum aims to update the 2012 recommendations for standardised reporting of protein electrophoresis in Australia and New Zealand. The sections which need to be updated include those on the quantification of gamma- and non-gamma-migrating paraproteins; interpretive commenting in specimens with a paraprotein and/or small abnormal bands; the utility of serum free light chains compared with Bence Jones protein measurement; and a new table with interpretive commenting for serum free light chains. It is expected that such standardised reporting will reduce both variation between laboratories and the risk of misinterpretation of results.
{"title":"Proposed Addendum to 2012 Recommendations for Standardised Reporting of Protein Electrophoresis in Australia and New Zealand.","authors":"Jillian R Tate, Joel D Smith, Nilika Wijeratne, Peter Mollee","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is apparent that there is a need for greater harmonisation of the reporting and quantification of paraproteins on protein electrophoresis with the introduction of the electronic health record and recent survey findings indicating ongoing areas of heterogeneity on serum protein electrophoresis. The proposed addendum aims to update the 2012 recommendations for standardised reporting of protein electrophoresis in Australia and New Zealand. The sections which need to be updated include those on the quantification of gamma- and non-gamma-migrating paraproteins; interpretive commenting in specimens with a paraprotein and/or small abnormal bands; the utility of serum free light chains compared with Bence Jones protein measurement; and a new table with interpretive commenting for serum free light chains. It is expected that such standardised reporting will reduce both variation between laboratories and the risk of misinterpretation of results.</p>","PeriodicalId":34924,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biochemist Reviews","volume":"40 1","pages":"23-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6370285/pdf/cbr-40-23.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41136962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The 'paraprotein', also known as M-protein, monoclonal protein and monoclonal component, has stood the test of time as the key biomarker in monoclonal gammopathies. It continues to reinvent itself as new electrophoretic and immunoassay methods are developed that are analytically more sensitive. Use of the serum free light chain immunoassay in particular has led to new clinical discoveries and improvements in the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with plasma cell dyscrasia and other monoclonal gammopathies. In addition, minimal residual disease can be detected using mass spectrometry and flow cytometry methods.
{"title":"The Paraprotein - an Enduring Biomarker.","authors":"Jillian R Tate","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 'paraprotein', also known as M-protein, monoclonal protein and monoclonal component, has stood the test of time as the key biomarker in monoclonal gammopathies. It continues to reinvent itself as new electrophoretic and immunoassay methods are developed that are analytically more sensitive. Use of the serum free light chain immunoassay in particular has led to new clinical discoveries and improvements in the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with plasma cell dyscrasia and other monoclonal gammopathies. In addition, minimal residual disease can be detected using mass spectrometry and flow cytometry methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":34924,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biochemist Reviews","volume":"40 1","pages":"5-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6370287/pdf/cbr-40-5.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41142737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nilika Wijeratne, Jillian R Tate, Louise Wienholt, Peter Mollee
Clinical laboratory testing is vital in the diagnosis, monitoring and prognostication of monoclonal gammopathies. Although the 2012 recommendations for standardised reporting of protein electrophoresis in Australia and New Zealand aimed to harmonise the laboratory practices related to paraprotein testing, the between-laboratory variation still exists. A survey was conducted to assess the between-laboratory variation in certain aspects of laboratory testing related to monoclonal gammopathy.
{"title":"Report of the Survey Conducted by RCPAQAP on Current Practice for Paraprotein and Serum Free Light Chain Measurement and Reporting: a Need for Harmonisation.","authors":"Nilika Wijeratne, Jillian R Tate, Louise Wienholt, Peter Mollee","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical laboratory testing is vital in the diagnosis, monitoring and prognostication of monoclonal gammopathies. Although the 2012 recommendations for standardised reporting of protein electrophoresis in Australia and New Zealand aimed to harmonise the laboratory practices related to paraprotein testing, the between-laboratory variation still exists. A survey was conducted to assess the between-laboratory variation in certain aspects of laboratory testing related to monoclonal gammopathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":34924,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biochemist Reviews","volume":"40 1","pages":"31-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6370284/pdf/cbr-40-31.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41151801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nilika Wijeratne, Jillian R Tate, Stephen Du Toit, Joel D Smith, Andrew Soepnel, Kay Weng Choy, Helen Martin, Robyn Henry, Kaye Glegg, Elizabeth Byrnes, Louise Wienholt, Peter Mollee
Quantification of co-migrating paraproteins in the beta-region presents an ongoing challenge for laboratories performing serum protein electrophoresis. The between-laboratory variation may impact patient care if the patient uses different pathology services during plasma cell dyscrasia monitoring. To identify the practical difficulties and determine the extent of agreement in the reporting of beta-migrating paraproteins in Australia and New Zealand (NZ), sample exchanges were conducted in five Australian states and in NZ in early 2018. This study has highlighted the variation in quantification and reporting of beta-migrating paraproteins which could potentially affect patient monitoring and management.
{"title":"Paraprotein Sample Exchange in Australia and New Zealand - 2018.","authors":"Nilika Wijeratne, Jillian R Tate, Stephen Du Toit, Joel D Smith, Andrew Soepnel, Kay Weng Choy, Helen Martin, Robyn Henry, Kaye Glegg, Elizabeth Byrnes, Louise Wienholt, Peter Mollee","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantification of co-migrating paraproteins in the beta-region presents an ongoing challenge for laboratories performing serum protein electrophoresis. The between-laboratory variation may impact patient care if the patient uses different pathology services during plasma cell dyscrasia monitoring. To identify the practical difficulties and determine the extent of agreement in the reporting of beta-migrating paraproteins in Australia and New Zealand (NZ), sample exchanges were conducted in five Australian states and in NZ in early 2018. This study has highlighted the variation in quantification and reporting of beta-migrating paraproteins which could potentially affect patient monitoring and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":34924,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biochemist Reviews","volume":"40 1","pages":"43-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6370286/pdf/cbr-40-43.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41104227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Proceedings of the Australasian Association of Clinical Biochemists’ 57th Annual Scientific Conference","authors":"","doi":"10.33176/2019abstracts","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33176/2019abstracts","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34924,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biochemist Reviews","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69515153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}