{"title":"The Knowledge Test Under the CISG - A Global Threefold Distinction of Negligence, Gross Negligence and De Facto Knowledge","authors":"M. Fogt","doi":"10.5195/JLC.2015.98","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/JLC.2015.98","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":35703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88958128","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article1 is an examination of the variety of real-world roles and characteristics which are the hallmarks of valuable, and well-balanced, inhouse counsel. As the number of employee-lawyers has steadily increased over time, the expectations, needs, demands, and complexities of representing client-companies “in-house” have also increased. The traditional approach to, and the practice of, law leaves significant gaps in the preparedness of lawyers to join in the employee, and executive, ranks of businesses. While a substantial body of literature focuses on specific issues, such as a privilege preservation, or on specific roles or nuances of roles, such as serving as general counsel, few resources discuss the practicalities of an in-house lawyer’s responsibility to make sure his or her contribution to a client-company—combined as legal counsel and as an employee or executive—is valuable, productive, and appropriate. Much of what this article discusses is based on anecdotal experiences and observations. Opinions and experiences may certainly vary, but the fact remains, in-house counsel are increasingly responsible for adding value to, and becoming more involved in the business strategy of, their organizations. This heightened need for employee-lawyers to understand and fulfill roles outside of the mere practice of law means that successful in-house counsel must be willing and able to wear many more hats than an advocate’s wig. * Assistant Professor of Business Law and Ethics, Emporia State University. 1 With permission, certain portions of this article are adapted from a book, authored by Steven Lovett, and published by ABA Publishing. STEVEN L. LOVETT, CORPORATE COUNSEL GUIDES: PRACTICE BASICS (2013). 114 JOURNAL OF LAW AND COMMERCE [Vol. 34:113 Vol. 34, No. 1 (2015) ● ISSN: 2164-7984 (online) ● ISSN 0733-2491 (print) DOI 10.5195/jlc.2015.99 ● http://jlc.law.pitt.edu TABLE OF CONTENTS I. The Increasing Presence of, and the Need for, In-House Counsel ............................................................................................. 115 II. The “Simplicity” of a Single Client .................................................. 119 III. General Counsel ................................................................................ 120 A. Advisor, Counselor, and Pundit ................................................ 121 B. The Managerial Role: “O Captain, My Captain!” ..................... 125 C. Working as an Executive Crewmember .................................... 127 D. Emissary, Agent, and Proxy ...................................................... 131 IV. In-House Counsel .............................................................................. 136 A. Adaptability ............................................................................... 139 B. Dedication ................................................................................. 140 C. Dependability ..................................................................
如果这些数字在2014年保持不变，那么有理由估计，在所有从事“律师”职业的人中，有13%到16%的人担任内部法律顾问:管理和/或受雇于公司的律师这一估计没有考虑到最近内部律师职位的上升趋势由于这个庞大的专业人口，大多数州律师协会，以及美国律师协会，都有专门的委员会和部门来研究公司法的细微差别，或者互换称为“商法”。独立的专业组织也如雨后春笋般涌现，以扩大传统的银行相关机构。公司法律顾问协会致力于“为在公司法律部门执业的律师的专业和商业利益服务”，目前拥有“代表美国和全球85个国家的10,000多家公司的35,000多名内部律师的多元化组合”。《内部法律顾问》是一份月刊，出版于《企业法律顾问协会内部法律顾问简介》(2006年12月)，http://www.acc.com/vl/public/Surveys/loader.cfm?csModule=security/getfile&pageid=16297&page=/le galresources/resource。cfm&qstring =显示= 16297标题= ACC % 20人口% 20的202006% % 20名内部% 20律师% 20。这是Cogent Research (www.cogentresearch.com)为企业法律顾问协会进行的一次性研究。3这一估计是基于对企业法律顾问协会调查提供的数据(上表，注2)和美国劳工统计局提供的职业图表的比较。参见美国劳工统计局，法律服务行业最大职业(2014年5月)，http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/ind_emp_chart/ind_emp_chart.htm(最后访问日期:2015年4月23日)。访谈由John Okray和Diana Li进行，内部法律顾问的招聘和薪酬趋势，联邦律师(2014年3月24日)，可在http://www.mlaglobal.com/ community/thought-leadership/ Hiring -and- Compensation - tren- for- internal。例如，参见美国律师协会商法部门的企业法律顾问委员会http://apps.americanbar.org/dch/committee.cfm?com=CL240000或美国律师协会诉讼部门的企业法律顾问委员会http://apps.americanbar.org/litigation/committees/corporate/ about.html。6企业法律顾问协会，会员，http://www.acc.com/membership/faqs.cfm(最后一次访问，2015年3月5日)。116 JOURNAL OF LAW AND COMMERCE [Vol. 34:13 13 Vol. 34, No. 1(2015)●ISSN: 2164-7984 (online)●ISSN 0733-2491 (print) DOI 10.5195/jlc.2015.99●http://jlc.law.pitt.edu专供内部法律顾问使用，”发行量4万份，包括首席法律官、副总裁和总法律顾问商业世界正变得越来越复杂。为了保持竞争力和发展，公司面临着一系列令人眼花缭乱的挑战:就业问题、监管合规、诉讼风险、交易问题和关系、多司法管辖区利益、知识产权、媒体关系，以及不断发展、很少满足的需求方消费者。律师日益成为这种环境中的关键参与者，企业比以往任何时候都更加认识到获得和留住称职、有效和高效的法律顾问的战略重要性许多企业已经采取了内部化律师的措施，聘请内部法律顾问加入他们的管理和运营团队，并将他们纳入公司的决策矩阵2007年,史蒂夫·乔布斯,苹果的标志性的创始人,是很难找到人来构建合适的法律部门在苹果公司(Apple Inc .),他发现丹尼尔·库珀曼当时甲骨文公司的法律总顾问Corporation.10一旦库普曼先生开店在苹果(祝福的拉里·埃里森,甲骨文)的首席执行官,他领导的方式建立一个法律部门,现在“整体公司的3000亿美元——保护其签名标志和7,INSIDECOUNSEL, http://www.insidecounsel.com/pages/aboutus.php(上次访问于2015年3月5日)。公司法律顾问协会(Association of Corporate Counsel)的“首席法律官2016年调查”(Chief Legal officer 2016 Survey)中的一段评论提供了一个大致的概念，说明有多少律师担任内部法律顾问。行政协调会将自己描述为“为85个国家的1万多个组织的4万多名公司律师提供服务的领导组织”。ACC首席法律官2016年调查1(企业法律顾问协会编辑，ACC 2016)， http://www.acc.com/vl/public/Surveys/loader .cfm?csModule=security/getfile&pageid=1422254&page=/legalresources/resource。cfm&qstring=show= 1422254&title=ACC%20Chief%20Legal%20Officer%20CLO%202016%20Survey%20%20Executive %20Summary&recorded=1(最后访问日期为2016年2月5日)。 该报告还反映了2015年“内部律师职位的显著增长(超过10%)”。Id。在31日。
{"title":"The Employee-Lawyer: A Candid Reflection on the True Roles and Responsibilities of in-House Counsel","authors":"S. Lovett","doi":"10.5195/jlc.2015.99","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/jlc.2015.99","url":null,"abstract":"This article1 is an examination of the variety of real-world roles and characteristics which are the hallmarks of valuable, and well-balanced, inhouse counsel. As the number of employee-lawyers has steadily increased over time, the expectations, needs, demands, and complexities of representing client-companies “in-house” have also increased. The traditional approach to, and the practice of, law leaves significant gaps in the preparedness of lawyers to join in the employee, and executive, ranks of businesses. While a substantial body of literature focuses on specific issues, such as a privilege preservation, or on specific roles or nuances of roles, such as serving as general counsel, few resources discuss the practicalities of an in-house lawyer’s responsibility to make sure his or her contribution to a client-company—combined as legal counsel and as an employee or executive—is valuable, productive, and appropriate. Much of what this article discusses is based on anecdotal experiences and observations. Opinions and experiences may certainly vary, but the fact remains, in-house counsel are increasingly responsible for adding value to, and becoming more involved in the business strategy of, their organizations. This heightened need for employee-lawyers to understand and fulfill roles outside of the mere practice of law means that successful in-house counsel must be willing and able to wear many more hats than an advocate’s wig. * Assistant Professor of Business Law and Ethics, Emporia State University. 1 With permission, certain portions of this article are adapted from a book, authored by Steven Lovett, and published by ABA Publishing. STEVEN L. LOVETT, CORPORATE COUNSEL GUIDES: PRACTICE BASICS (2013). 114 JOURNAL OF LAW AND COMMERCE [Vol. 34:113 Vol. 34, No. 1 (2015) ● ISSN: 2164-7984 (online) ● ISSN 0733-2491 (print) DOI 10.5195/jlc.2015.99 ● http://jlc.law.pitt.edu TABLE OF CONTENTS I. The Increasing Presence of, and the Need for, In-House Counsel ............................................................................................. 115 II. The “Simplicity” of a Single Client .................................................. 119 III. General Counsel ................................................................................ 120 A. Advisor, Counselor, and Pundit ................................................ 121 B. The Managerial Role: “O Captain, My Captain!” ..................... 125 C. Working as an Executive Crewmember .................................... 127 D. Emissary, Agent, and Proxy ...................................................... 131 IV. In-House Counsel .............................................................................. 136 A. Adaptability ............................................................................... 139 B. Dedication ................................................................................. 140 C. Dependability ..................................................................","PeriodicalId":35703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90073498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) defines a farmers’ market as “a multi-stall market at which farmer-producers sell agricultural products directly to the general public at a central or fixed location, particularly fresh fruit and vegetables (but also meat products, dairy products, and/or grains).” [1] The recent resurgence in the popularity of farmers’ markets represents a return to days past where local producers were the predominant source for fresh produce and agricultural goods. With the most farmers’ markets of any state, [2] California has a large interest in the success of its farmers’ markets. In furtherance of this interest, California endeavors to protect its farmers’ markets from fraud. [3] Prior to 2015, California had one of the strictest farmers’ market regulatory programs in the United States. [4] Even so, the California legislature decided that more needed to be done in order to prevent farmers’ market fraud and on September 26, 2014 enacted Assembly Bill 1871 (“A.B. 1871”). [5] The primary function of this Note is to analyze A.B. 1871 and develop an understanding of the California model for regulation of farmers’ markets. This model will be compared to the approaches taken by New York and Michigan (states with the second and third most farmers’ markets) [6] to develop a greater understanding of the various approaches to farmers’ market regulation. The goal of this Note is to serve as a policy guide for farmers’ market regulation. Following this introduction, this Note will proceed in six parts. Part I will discuss the recent history of farmers’ markets with a particular emphasis on the economic and social impact that farmers’ markets have on the communities in which they operate. Part II addresses the nature of farmers’ market fraud and some general ways that states and farmers’ market vendors and operators combat fraud. Part III will provide a comprehensive analysis of A.B. 1871 and its components. Part IV will provide a comparative analysis of the regulatory approaches taken by New York and Michigan. Part V outlines four general factors for states to consider before enacting statewide regulations for farmers’ markets. Finally, Part VI concludes with guidance on state policy regarding regulation of farmers’ markets. [1] What is a Farmers’ Market? , USDA Food & Nutrition Serv., (May 27, 2015), http://www.fns.usda.gov/ebt/what-farmers-market. This Note will adhere to this definition of “farmers’ market,” and any reference to “farmers’ market,” unless specifically stated otherwise, is intended to reference this definition. [2] National Farmers Market Directory , USDA Agric. Mktg. Serv., http://search.ams.usda.gov/farmersmarkets/ (last visited February 1, 2015). As of January 2015, California had over 760 farmers’ markets registered with the USDA. The USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service (“AMS”) collects farmers’ market information and numbers through voluntarily submitted data. Id. [3] For the purposes of this N
{"title":"Farmers’ Market Fraud: California’s Approach and What It Means for Farmers’ Market Regulation","authors":"Nathan J. Marketich","doi":"10.5195/JLC.2015.88","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/JLC.2015.88","url":null,"abstract":"The United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) defines a farmers’ market as “a multi-stall market at which farmer-producers sell agricultural products directly to the general public at a central or fixed location, particularly fresh fruit and vegetables (but also meat products, dairy products, and/or grains).” [1] The recent resurgence in the popularity of farmers’ markets represents a return to days past where local producers were the predominant source for fresh produce and agricultural goods. With the most farmers’ markets of any state, [2] California has a large interest in the success of its farmers’ markets. In furtherance of this interest, California endeavors to protect its farmers’ markets from fraud. [3] Prior to 2015, California had one of the strictest farmers’ market regulatory programs in the United States. [4] Even so, the California legislature decided that more needed to be done in order to prevent farmers’ market fraud and on September 26, 2014 enacted Assembly Bill 1871 (“A.B. 1871”). [5] The primary function of this Note is to analyze A.B. 1871 and develop an understanding of the California model for regulation of farmers’ markets. This model will be compared to the approaches taken by New York and Michigan (states with the second and third most farmers’ markets) [6] to develop a greater understanding of the various approaches to farmers’ market regulation. The goal of this Note is to serve as a policy guide for farmers’ market regulation. Following this introduction, this Note will proceed in six parts. Part I will discuss the recent history of farmers’ markets with a particular emphasis on the economic and social impact that farmers’ markets have on the communities in which they operate. Part II addresses the nature of farmers’ market fraud and some general ways that states and farmers’ market vendors and operators combat fraud. Part III will provide a comprehensive analysis of A.B. 1871 and its components. Part IV will provide a comparative analysis of the regulatory approaches taken by New York and Michigan. Part V outlines four general factors for states to consider before enacting statewide regulations for farmers’ markets. Finally, Part VI concludes with guidance on state policy regarding regulation of farmers’ markets. [1] What is a Farmers’ Market? , USDA Food & Nutrition Serv., (May 27, 2015), http://www.fns.usda.gov/ebt/what-farmers-market. This Note will adhere to this definition of “farmers’ market,” and any reference to “farmers’ market,” unless specifically stated otherwise, is intended to reference this definition. [2] National Farmers Market Directory , USDA Agric. Mktg. Serv., http://search.ams.usda.gov/farmersmarkets/ (last visited February 1, 2015). As of January 2015, California had over 760 farmers’ markets registered with the USDA. The USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service (“AMS”) collects farmers’ market information and numbers through voluntarily submitted data. Id. [3] For the purposes of this N","PeriodicalId":35703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89517069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Experiential Education Through the Vis Moot","authors":"Eric E. Bergsten","doi":"10.5195/JLC.2015.97","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/JLC.2015.97","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":35703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73043288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"United States v. Morrison 15 Years Later: How the Supreme Court's Disjointed Adjudication of Commerce Clause Legislation Opens a Back Door to Restoring Federal Civil Recourse for Certain Victims of Gender-Based Violence","authors":"Anne M. Schober","doi":"10.5195/jlc.2015.94","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/jlc.2015.94","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":35703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89785310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article discusses such new and innovative methods of bond financing that utilize unique security devices and repayment techniques in order to provide financing to nonprofit entities that otherwise would not have had access to capital on favorable terms. In Part I, this article will discuss how Catholic conduit mortgage bonds compare to more common municipal bonds, the specific terms of Conduit Mortgage Bonds, and offer a case study intended to demonstrate the mechanics of these bonds. Part II will discuss the comparative advantages of the Endowment Funding Program, explain the role of bond financing in the Program, and provide another case study. Part III will explain how the LIFT Bond Program is being used to facilitate structured giving—again with a focus on the role of bond financing as part of the Program—and analyze its role as one component in the larger Endowment Funding Program. Finally, Part IV will discuss the newest developments in the realm of Catholic conduit mortgage bonds.
{"title":"Employing One's \"Talents\": The Power of Innovative Bond Transactions to Finance Catholic Nonprofits","authors":"C. Blain","doi":"10.5195/jlc.2015.84","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/jlc.2015.84","url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses such new and innovative methods of bond financing that utilize unique security devices and repayment techniques in order to provide financing to nonprofit entities that otherwise would not have had access to capital on favorable terms. In Part I, this article will discuss how Catholic conduit mortgage bonds compare to more common municipal bonds, the specific terms of Conduit Mortgage Bonds, and offer a case study intended to demonstrate the mechanics of these bonds. Part II will discuss the comparative advantages of the Endowment Funding Program, explain the role of bond financing in the Program, and provide another case study. Part III will explain how the LIFT Bond Program is being used to facilitate structured giving—again with a focus on the role of bond financing as part of the Program—and analyze its role as one component in the larger Endowment Funding Program. Finally, Part IV will discuss the newest developments in the realm of Catholic conduit mortgage bonds.","PeriodicalId":35703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce","volume":"14 1","pages":"207-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81915823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
As the ACA expands Medicaid eligibility by creating a national Medicaid minimum eligibility level of 133% of the federal poverty level and requires U.S. citizens to purchase health insurance as a result of the individual mandate, the shortage of primary care physicians will become painfully apparent for those seeking treatment. As a result, many health policy analysts and lawmakers are examining the potential ability of retail health clinics (RHCs) to address the consequences of primary care physician shortages in the United States, among other deficiencies in the provision of health care.
{"title":"Retail Therapy: How a Trip to the Store Can Make You Feel Better in the Evolving Health Care Landscape Created by the Affordable Care Act","authors":"C. Liba","doi":"10.5195/jlc.2015.81","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/jlc.2015.81","url":null,"abstract":"As the ACA expands Medicaid eligibility by creating a national Medicaid minimum eligibility level of 133% of the federal poverty level and requires U.S. citizens to purchase health insurance as a result of the individual mandate, the shortage of primary care physicians will become painfully apparent for those seeking treatment. As a result, many health policy analysts and lawmakers are examining the potential ability of retail health clinics (RHCs) to address the consequences of primary care physician shortages in the United States, among other deficiencies in the provision of health care.","PeriodicalId":35703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce","volume":"6 1","pages":"239-260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80140787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) demonstrates the United States’ commitment to fight against bribery and corruption and the FCPA has had a substantial impact on commerce between organizations in the United States and the developing word.
{"title":"The Influence of Corruption on the Developing World: The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, International Commerce and Africa","authors":"Nellie R. Dunderdale","doi":"10.5195/JLC.2015.82","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/JLC.2015.82","url":null,"abstract":"The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) demonstrates the United States’ commitment to fight against bribery and corruption and the FCPA has had a substantial impact on commerce between organizations in the United States and the developing word.","PeriodicalId":35703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce","volume":"171 1","pages":"261-277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86802614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Stretching the Twenty-First Amendment Beyond Its Limit: A Critique of S. Wine & Spirits of Am., Inc. v. Div. of Alcohol & Tobacco Control","authors":"Kevin Green","doi":"10.5195/JLC.2014.77","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/JLC.2014.77","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":35703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce","volume":"99 1","pages":"142-164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86745152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Amazon, or the Modern Prometheus: How the Kindle is Firing Up a Reading Revolution, and Why the Status Quo is Resisting","authors":"Stanley Joseph Konoval","doi":"10.5195/JLC.2014.76","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/JLC.2014.76","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":35703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce","volume":"27 1","pages":"118-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80620405","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：