Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal最新文献

We report a long QT syndrome 15 whose diagnosis was suspected during foetal life and confirmed at birth and was associated with congenital heart disease. Genetic testing revealed a rare mutation associated with the CALM2 gene. At 23 weeks of gestation, severe foetal sinus bradycardia (∼100 bpm) was detected. In the third trimester, the foetus developed severe right ventricular hypertrophy. At birth, the electrocardiogram showed a long QT interval of 640 ms, and after 1 hour, the newborn showed functional 2:1 atrioventricular block at ventricular rate of 50 bpm. After further pharmacological therapies, epicardial wires were surgically implanted for transient pacing in VVI mode at 90 bpm. Echocardiogram showed aneurysmatic left atrial appendage, dilated right segments, hypertrophied right ventricle, ostium secundum type atrial septal defect, and muscular ventricular septal defect. At two weeks of postpartum, a permanent dual-chamber pacemaker was implanted in the DDD mode and the patient was discharged with a prescription of beta-blockers and calcium therapy.

Background

Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a novel physiological pacing technique which may serve as an alternative to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) by biventricular pacing (BVP). This study assessed ventricular activation patterns and echocardiographic and clinical outcomes of LBBP and compared this to BVP.

Methods

Fifty consecutive patients underwent LBBP or BVP for CRT. Ventricular activation mapping was obtained by ultra-high-frequency ECG (UHF-ECG). Functional and echocardiographic outcomes and hospitalization for heart failure and all-cause mortality after one year from implantation were evaluated.

Results

LBBP resulted in greater resynchronization vs BVP (QRS width: 170 ± 16 ms to 128 ± 20 ms vs 174 ± 15 to 144 ± 17 ms, p = 0.002 (LBBP vs BVP); e-DYS 81 ± 17 ms to 0 ± 32 ms vs 77 ± 18 to 16 ± 29 ms, p = 0.016 (LBBP vs BVP)). Improvement in LVEF (from 28 ± 8 to 42 ± 10 percent vs 28 ± 9 to 36 ± 12 percent, LBBP vs BVP, p = 0.078) was similar. Improvement in NYHA function class (from 2.4 to 1.5 and from 2.3 to 1.5 (LBBP vs BVP)), hospitalization for heart failure and all-cause mortality were comparable in both groups.

Conclusions

Ventricular dyssynchrony imaging is an appropriate way to gain a better insight into activation patterns of LBBP and BVP. LBBP resulted in greater resynchronization (e-DYS and QRS duration) with comparable improvement in LVEF, NYHA functional class, hospitalization for heart failure and all-cause mortality at one year of follow up.

Introduction

While atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has proven beneficial for heart failure (HF) patients, most reports were performed with radiofrequency ablation. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cryoballoon AF ablation in patients with HFrEF.

Method

We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane database from inception to December 2022. Studies that reported the outcomes of freedom from atrial arrhythmia, complications, NYHA functional class (NYHA FC), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after Cryoballoon AF ablation in HF patients were included. Data from each study were combined with a random-effects model.

Result

A total of 9 studies observational studies with 1414 HF patients were included. Five studies had only HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 1 study with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and others with mixed HF types. Freedom from AA in HFrEF at 12 months was 64% (95% CI 56–71%, I² 58%). There was a significant improvement of LVEF in these patients with a standard mean difference of 13% (95% CI 8.6–17.5%, I² 99% P < 0.001. The complication rate in HFrEF group was 6% (95% CI 4–10%, I² 0%). The risk of recurrence of atrial arrhythmia was not significantly different between HF and no HF patients (RR 1.34, 95% CI 0.8–2.23, I2 76%).

Conclusion

Cryoballoon AF ablation is effective in HFrEF patients comparable to radiofrequency ablation. The complication rate was low.

A 15-year-old boy with manifest preexcitation and recurrent palpitations had undergone an unsuccessful ablation procedure elsewhere and was subsequently referred to us. The ECG suggested a left free wall pathway but there was a pattern break in lead V2. This helped localise the accessory pathway to the summit region and achieve success.

We performed cardiac resynchronization therapy by means of conduction system pacing in a heart transplant patient suffering from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation with conduction disturbance (bifascicular block and QRS >160 ms). ECG monitoring showed paroxysmal atrioventricular block. Biventricular pacing was not feasible due to the absence of a suitable coronary sinus branch for pacing. His bundle pacing was performed, and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted due to severe left ventricular dysfunction. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy was excluded. During follow-up, the patient's left ventricular function improved, and symptoms alleviated with a high percentage of ventricular stimulation.