Pub Date : 2020-12-29eCollection Date: 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1089/cren.2020.0182
Alexander K Chow, Rohit Bhatt, David Cao, Brandon Wahba, Christopher L Coogan, Srinivas Vourganti, Edward E Cherullo, Sam B Bhayani, Ramakrishna J Venkatesh, Robert Sherb Figenshau
Background: Delayed proximal ureteral stricture (DPUS) after nephron-sparing treatment (partial nephrectomy [PN] and image-guided percutaneous ablation) of renal masses is a rare complication that occurs because of an unrecognized injury to the proximal ureter and/or its associated vascular supply. We present a multi-institutional series of patients who developed DPUS after nephron-sparing treatment and review relevant tumor characteristics, timing of DPUS presentation, presenting symptoms, and outcome of stricture management. Case Presentation: Between 2000 and 2019, nine patients (five PN and four ablation) were found to have DPUS diagnosed at an average of 9 (6-119) months after PN and 5.5 (1-6) after ablation. Average tumor size was 4.5 (2.9-7.3) cm and 3.6 (3-4.1) cm for those treated with PN and ablation, respectively. Nephrometry score was 8.3 (6-11) and 6.5 (5-8), respectively. For resected tumors, all were located in the lower pole, but uniformity was not found as far as medial vs lateral (3 vs 2), anterior vs posterior (2 vs 2, 1 N/A), and right vs left (3 vs 2). For ablated tumors, all four tumors were right sided, anterior, medial, and lower pole. Initial signs and symptoms include sepsis (2), flank pain (5), and asymptomatic hydronephrosis (2). Concomitant urinoma (2) and retroperitoneal abscess (1) was found on imaging. Initial management included ureteral stenting (5) and percutaneous nephrostomy tube (4). Three underwent nephrectomy. Two had spontaneous resolution of DPUS after a course of ureteral stenting. Conclusion: Potential risk factors associated with DPUS after nephron-sparing treatment, including medial and lower pole tumors, and particularly right-sided anterior masses for ablation and higher complexity nephrometry score for PN. Recognition of delayed symptoms and imaging abnormalities in the surveillance period should cue clinical suspicion to DPUS.
背景:肾肿块保留肾脏治疗(部分肾切除术和图像引导下的经皮消融)后的延迟性输尿管近端狭窄(DPUS)是一种罕见的并发症,因为输尿管近端和/或其相关血管供应未被识别损伤。我们报道了一组在保留肾单元治疗后发生DPUS的多机构患者,并回顾了相关的肿瘤特征、DPUS出现的时间、表现症状和狭窄处理的结果。病例介绍:在2000年至2019年期间,发现9例患者(5例PN和4例消融)在PN后平均9(6-119)个月和消融后平均5.5(1-6)个月诊断出DPUS。PN组和消融组的平均肿瘤大小分别为4.5 (2.9-7.3)cm和3.6 (3-4.1)cm。肾脏测量评分分别为8.3(6-11)和6.5(5-8)。对于切除的肿瘤,所有肿瘤都位于下极,但在内侧vs外侧(3 vs 2),前部vs后部(2 vs 2, 1 N/A)和右侧vs左侧(3 vs 2)方面没有发现均匀性。对于消融的肿瘤,所有四个肿瘤都位于右侧,前,内侧和下极。最初的体征和症状包括脓毒症(2)、侧腹疼痛(5)和无症状肾积水(2)。影像学检查发现伴有尿瘤(2)和腹膜后脓肿(1)。最初的治疗包括输尿管支架置入术(5例)和经皮肾造口管(4例)。3例行肾切除术。2例在输尿管支架放置一个疗程后DPUS自行消退。结论:保留肾单元治疗后DPUS的潜在危险因素包括内侧和下极肿瘤,特别是右侧前肿瘤消融和更高的复杂性肾测量评分。在监测期间识别延迟症状和影像学异常应提示临床怀疑DPUS。
{"title":"A Case Series of Delayed Proximal Ureteral Strictures After Nephron-Sparing Treatment of Renal Masses.","authors":"Alexander K Chow, Rohit Bhatt, David Cao, Brandon Wahba, Christopher L Coogan, Srinivas Vourganti, Edward E Cherullo, Sam B Bhayani, Ramakrishna J Venkatesh, Robert Sherb Figenshau","doi":"10.1089/cren.2020.0182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2020.0182","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Delayed proximal ureteral stricture (DPUS) after nephron-sparing treatment (partial nephrectomy [PN] and image-guided percutaneous ablation) of renal masses is a rare complication that occurs because of an unrecognized injury to the proximal ureter and/or its associated vascular supply. We present a multi-institutional series of patients who developed DPUS after nephron-sparing treatment and review relevant tumor characteristics, timing of DPUS presentation, presenting symptoms, and outcome of stricture management. <b><i>Case Presentation:</i></b> Between 2000 and 2019, nine patients (five PN and four ablation) were found to have DPUS diagnosed at an average of 9 (6-119) months after PN and 5.5 (1-6) after ablation. Average tumor size was 4.5 (2.9-7.3) cm and 3.6 (3-4.1) cm for those treated with PN and ablation, respectively. Nephrometry score was 8.3 (6-11) and 6.5 (5-8), respectively. For resected tumors, all were located in the lower pole, but uniformity was not found as far as medial <i>vs</i> lateral (3 <i>vs</i> 2), anterior <i>vs</i> posterior (2 <i>vs</i> 2, 1 N/A), and right <i>vs</i> left (3 <i>vs</i> 2). For ablated tumors, all four tumors were right sided, anterior, medial, and lower pole. Initial signs and symptoms include sepsis (2), flank pain (5), and asymptomatic hydronephrosis (2). Concomitant urinoma (2) and retroperitoneal abscess (1) was found on imaging. Initial management included ureteral stenting (5) and percutaneous nephrostomy tube (4). Three underwent nephrectomy. Two had spontaneous resolution of DPUS after a course of ureteral stenting. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Potential risk factors associated with DPUS after nephron-sparing treatment, including medial and lower pole tumors, and particularly right-sided anterior masses for ablation and higher complexity nephrometry score for PN. Recognition of delayed symptoms and imaging abnormalities in the surveillance period should cue clinical suspicion to DPUS.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"544-547"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803190/pdf/cren.2020.0182.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38832366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-29eCollection Date: 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1089/cren.2020.0189
Albert Carrion, Carles Raventós, Fernando Lozano, Maria E Semidey, Ignasi Gallardo, Enrique Trilla
Background: Despite concomitant bladder and upper urinary tract cancers are present in 17% of cases, the simultaneous affection of the urethra, bladder, and both upper urinary tracts is extremely rare. Treatment decisions in this setting could be challenging because of the lack of evidence in the literature. Case Presentation: A 65-year-old Caucasian man with a history of nine low-grade (LG) and multifocal bladder tumor recurrences during the past 4 years is referred to our department with a newly diagnosed panurothelial carcinoma involving the bladder, urethra, and both upper urinary tracts. Because of the large and recurrent LG bladder tumor, the urethral involvement and the presence of bilateral pyelocaliceal tumors >4 cm the patient underwent a robot-assisted complete urinary tract extirpation (CUTE). Operating time was 360 minutes and blood loss 460 mL. No intraoperative complications were reported and blood transfusion was not required. The patient developed a surgical site infection in the glans that was solved with antibiotics without any other postoperative complication. He started renal replacement therapy and was discharged 6 days after the surgery. Pathologic analysis showed multifocal urothelial carcinomas; pTa LG involving the bladder and the prostatic-bulbar-membranous-penile urethra, pT3 high grade (HG) in right renal pelvis, pT1 HG in left renal pelvis, and pN0 in pelvic lymph node dissection. After a reasonable free-recurrence period of time the patient could be evaluated for a robot-assisted intracorporeal urinary diversion in preparation for a later renal transplantation. Conclusion: Robot-assisted CUTE could be a feasible and safe technique for selected patients with simultaneous panurothelial carcinoma. Further multicentric studies are warranted to determine the safety of this minimally invasive approach in patients with different comorbidities.
{"title":"A Robot-Assisted Complete Urinary Tract Extirpation in a Patient with Simultaneous Panurothelial Carcinoma: A Case Report.","authors":"Albert Carrion, Carles Raventós, Fernando Lozano, Maria E Semidey, Ignasi Gallardo, Enrique Trilla","doi":"10.1089/cren.2020.0189","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2020.0189","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Despite concomitant bladder and upper urinary tract cancers are present in 17% of cases, the simultaneous affection of the urethra, bladder, and both upper urinary tracts is extremely rare. Treatment decisions in this setting could be challenging because of the lack of evidence in the literature. <b><i>Case Presentation:</i></b> A 65-year-old Caucasian man with a history of nine low-grade (LG) and multifocal bladder tumor recurrences during the past 4 years is referred to our department with a newly diagnosed panurothelial carcinoma involving the bladder, urethra, and both upper urinary tracts. Because of the large and recurrent LG bladder tumor, the urethral involvement and the presence of bilateral pyelocaliceal tumors >4 cm the patient underwent a robot-assisted complete urinary tract extirpation (CUTE). Operating time was 360 minutes and blood loss 460 mL. No intraoperative complications were reported and blood transfusion was not required. The patient developed a surgical site infection in the glans that was solved with antibiotics without any other postoperative complication. He started renal replacement therapy and was discharged 6 days after the surgery. Pathologic analysis showed multifocal urothelial carcinomas; pTa LG involving the bladder and the prostatic-bulbar-membranous-penile urethra, pT3 high grade (HG) in right renal pelvis, pT1 HG in left renal pelvis, and pN0 in pelvic lymph node dissection. After a reasonable free-recurrence period of time the patient could be evaluated for a robot-assisted intracorporeal urinary diversion in preparation for a later renal transplantation. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Robot-assisted CUTE could be a feasible and safe technique for selected patients with simultaneous panurothelial carcinoma. Further multicentric studies are warranted to determine the safety of this minimally invasive approach in patients with different comorbidities.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"483-486"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803193/pdf/cren.2020.0189.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38828617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-29eCollection Date: 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1089/cren.2020.0187
Mohammad Hout, David Sobel, Gyan Pareek, Sammy Elsamra
Background: SpaceOAR (organ at risk) hydrogel is a hydrogel matrix injected into the perirectal space posterior to the prostate for the purpose of mitigating radiation dose (and hence side effects of radiation) on the rectum. Manufacturer descriptions state that this material is reabsorbed 3 to 6 months after injection. Case Discussion: We encountered a 75-year old male patient who underwent SpaceOAR injection in anticipation for primary external beam radiation treatment for intermediate risk prostate cancer (Gleason score 7 = 4 + 3, prostate specific Antigen [PSA] = 2.32, cT2a). After initiation of androgen deprivation, but before radiotherapy, the patient decided to no longer undergo radiation but rather elected to proceed with surgery. Based on the presence of the SpaceOAR, we delayed his surgery to 6 months after SpaceOAR injection to allow for absorption of the material. A preoperative MRI showed persistent hydrogel matrix in the perirectal space. We performed a robotic radical prostatectomy effectively despite the persistent SpaceOAR hydrogel by modifying our dissection closer to the prostate posteriorly. Conclusion: SpaceOAR hydrogel may alter patient anatomy even 6 months after deployment, however, robotic prostatectomy would be feasible with proper knowledge of anatomy and by following the proper dissection planes above the perirectal space.
{"title":"Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy 6 Months After Rectal Spacer Hydrogel Injection.","authors":"Mohammad Hout, David Sobel, Gyan Pareek, Sammy Elsamra","doi":"10.1089/cren.2020.0187","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2020.0187","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> SpaceOAR (organ at risk) hydrogel is a hydrogel matrix injected into the perirectal space posterior to the prostate for the purpose of mitigating radiation dose (and hence side effects of radiation) on the rectum. Manufacturer descriptions state that this material is reabsorbed 3 to 6 months after injection. <b><i>Case Discussion:</i></b> We encountered a 75-year old male patient who underwent SpaceOAR injection in anticipation for primary external beam radiation treatment for intermediate risk prostate cancer (Gleason score 7 = 4 + 3, prostate specific Antigen [PSA] = 2.32, cT2a). After initiation of androgen deprivation, but before radiotherapy, the patient decided to no longer undergo radiation but rather elected to proceed with surgery. Based on the presence of the SpaceOAR, we delayed his surgery to 6 months after SpaceOAR injection to allow for absorption of the material. A preoperative MRI showed persistent hydrogel matrix in the perirectal space. We performed a robotic radical prostatectomy effectively despite the persistent SpaceOAR hydrogel by modifying our dissection closer to the prostate posteriorly. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> SpaceOAR hydrogel may alter patient anatomy even 6 months after deployment, however, robotic prostatectomy would be feasible with proper knowledge of anatomy and by following the proper dissection planes above the perirectal space.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"454-456"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803204/pdf/cren.2020.0187.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38828640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-29eCollection Date: 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1089/cren.2020.0105
Matthew Lee, Ziho Lee, Michael J Metro, Daniel D Eun
Introduction: Surgical management of long-segment radiation-induced distal ureteral strictures (RIDUS) is challenging. Pelvic radiation can damage the bladder, inhibiting the utilization of typical reconstruction techniques such as a psoas hitch and/or Boari flap. Also, radiation can cause scarring that can make ureterolysis difficult. Case Presentation: We present a case series of patients undergoing robotic ureteral bypass surgery with appendiceal graft for management of strictures in this setting. This novel procedure utilizes the patient's appendix as a bypass graft to divert urine away from the strictured portion of ureter and into the bladder; this technique does not require dissection of the strictured ureteral segment. Conclusion: Robotic ureteral bypass surgery can be effective for management of long-segment RIDUS.
{"title":"Robotic Ureteral Bypass Surgery with Appendiceal Graft for Management of Long-Segment Radiation-Induced Distal Ureteral Strictures: A Case Series.","authors":"Matthew Lee, Ziho Lee, Michael J Metro, Daniel D Eun","doi":"10.1089/cren.2020.0105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2020.0105","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Surgical management of long-segment radiation-induced distal ureteral strictures (RIDUS) is challenging. Pelvic radiation can damage the bladder, inhibiting the utilization of typical reconstruction techniques such as a psoas hitch and/or Boari flap. Also, radiation can cause scarring that can make ureterolysis difficult. <b><i>Case Presentation:</i></b> We present a case series of patients undergoing robotic ureteral bypass surgery with appendiceal graft for management of strictures in this setting. This novel procedure utilizes the patient's appendix as a bypass graft to divert urine away from the strictured portion of ureter and into the bladder; this technique does not require dissection of the strictured ureteral segment. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Robotic ureteral bypass surgery can be effective for management of long-segment RIDUS.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"305-309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803247/pdf/cren.2020.0105.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38828834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Crossed fused renal ectopia (CFRE) is a rare fusion anomaly of the kidneys, with a predisposition to calculus disease. Management of renal calculi in CFRE is not standardized because of paucity of literature. We managed a 32-year-old man with left to right CFRE with multiple stones in both the kidneys by percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the right moiety and laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for the crossed moiety. Based on the stone burden and anatomy, we decided to go for a staged approach, to provide maximum clearance rate with least risk. We share our experience in this case, with regard to the use of two different but minimally invasive modalities for effective management of the patient. We also emphasize on the utilization of a staged approach whenever required for patient safety. We also reviewed the literature regarding the management of kidney stones in this rare anomaly.
{"title":"Minimally Invasive Approaches for Stone Clearance in Crossed Fused Renal Ectopia.","authors":"Ankur Bhatnagar, Manish Kumar Choudhary, Subhash Kumar","doi":"10.1089/cren.2020.0119","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2020.0119","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Crossed fused renal ectopia (CFRE) is a rare fusion anomaly of the kidneys, with a predisposition to calculus disease. Management of renal calculi in CFRE is not standardized because of paucity of literature. We managed a 32-year-old man with left to right CFRE with multiple stones in both the kidneys by percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the right moiety and laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for the crossed moiety. Based on the stone burden and anatomy, we decided to go for a staged approach, to provide maximum clearance rate with least risk. We share our experience in this case, with regard to the use of two different but minimally invasive modalities for effective management of the patient. We also emphasize on the utilization of a staged approach whenever required for patient safety. We also reviewed the literature regarding the management of kidney stones in this rare anomaly.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"374-376"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803231/pdf/cren.2020.0119.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38828843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-29eCollection Date: 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1089/cren.2020.0038
Manas Sharma, Vikram Prabha, Shishir Devaraju
Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is an effective minimally invasive surgical modality for the management of renal calculi. It is generally considered safe with commonly encountered complications being urinary extravasation, fever, and bleeding. Injury to the biliary tract or puncture of the gallbladder is an extremely rare but a grave complication of PCNL. Case Presentation: We present a case of a 70-year-old man who underwent PCNL for an obstructing right renal pelvic calculus. Upon middle caliceal puncture to access the pelvicaliceal system, an unexpected green aspirate suggestive of bile was noted egressing through the puncture needle when stiletto was detached. The needle was swiftly withdrawn and percutaneous renal access was effective on the second puncture to complete the procedure. In the postoperative period, biliary ascites was confirmed on imaging, which was managed in a minimally invasive manner with an ultrasonography-guided abdominal drain insertion. The patient recovered well and was discharged home. Conclusion: Biliary ascites with or without peritonitis is a rare but potentially fatal consequence of biliary tract injury that can occur during PCNL. If there is recognition of biliary aspirate during a percutaneous renal procedure, aggressive management, including diverting the biliary fluid in appropriately selected cases, can obviate the need for emergent open or laparoscopic surgical intervention as highlighted in our case.
{"title":"Injury to Biliary Tract During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Minimally Invasive Management of a Dreadful Complication.","authors":"Manas Sharma, Vikram Prabha, Shishir Devaraju","doi":"10.1089/cren.2020.0038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2020.0038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is an effective minimally invasive surgical modality for the management of renal calculi. It is generally considered safe with commonly encountered complications being urinary extravasation, fever, and bleeding. Injury to the biliary tract or puncture of the gallbladder is an extremely rare but a grave complication of PCNL. <b><i>Case Presentation:</i></b> We present a case of a 70-year-old man who underwent PCNL for an obstructing right renal pelvic calculus. Upon middle caliceal puncture to access the pelvicaliceal system, an unexpected green aspirate suggestive of bile was noted egressing through the puncture needle when stiletto was detached. The needle was swiftly withdrawn and percutaneous renal access was effective on the second puncture to complete the procedure. In the postoperative period, biliary ascites was confirmed on imaging, which was managed in a minimally invasive manner with an ultrasonography-guided abdominal drain insertion. The patient recovered well and was discharged home. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Biliary ascites with or without peritonitis is a rare but potentially fatal consequence of biliary tract injury that can occur during PCNL. If there is recognition of biliary aspirate during a percutaneous renal procedure, aggressive management, including diverting the biliary fluid in appropriately selected cases, can obviate the need for emergent open or laparoscopic surgical intervention as highlighted in our case.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"380-383"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/cren.2020.0038","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38828845","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-29eCollection Date: 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1089/cren.2020.0141
Braulio O Manzo, Eduardo Tejeda, Ben H Chew, Pompeyo Alarcon, Edson Flores, J Ernesto Torres
Background: An uncommon cause of recurrent renal colic is mucous tissue passage secondary to renal papillae necrosis. Because of its low prevalence, the correct management of recurrent obstructive uropathy produced by renal papillary necrosis (RPN) is not well defined. Case Presentation: We present a case of recurrent renal colic associated with the expulsion of mucous tissue in a young woman's urine with a history of excessive consumption of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The patient required multiple admissions to the emergency department because of recurrent episodes of renal colic. A retrograde pyelogram and histopathologic study of the expulsed tissue supported the diagnosis of RPN. The patient was managed with Double-J stents for 12 months, complete withdrawal of NSAIDs, and large volume intake of water. A satisfactory outcome was seen radiologically and endoscopically after treatment. The patient stopped experiencing new renal colic episodes because of the passive ureteral dilatation despite still presenting the mucous tissue expulsion in the urine. Conclusions: Passive ureteral dilatation with Double-J stents could possibly be an effective treatment for patients with recurrent renal colic secondary to persistent renal papillae necrosis.
{"title":"Long-Term Passive Ureteral Dilatation with Double-J Stent: Possibly an Effective Treatment for Recurrent Renal Colic Caused by Papillary Renal Necrosis.","authors":"Braulio O Manzo, Eduardo Tejeda, Ben H Chew, Pompeyo Alarcon, Edson Flores, J Ernesto Torres","doi":"10.1089/cren.2020.0141","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2020.0141","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> An uncommon cause of recurrent renal colic is mucous tissue passage secondary to renal papillae necrosis. Because of its low prevalence, the correct management of recurrent obstructive uropathy produced by renal papillary necrosis (RPN) is not well defined. <b><i>Case Presentation:</i></b> We present a case of recurrent renal colic associated with the expulsion of mucous tissue in a young woman's urine with a history of excessive consumption of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The patient required multiple admissions to the emergency department because of recurrent episodes of renal colic. A retrograde pyelogram and histopathologic study of the expulsed tissue supported the diagnosis of RPN. The patient was managed with Double-J stents for 12 months, complete withdrawal of NSAIDs, and large volume intake of water. A satisfactory outcome was seen radiologically and endoscopically after treatment. The patient stopped experiencing new renal colic episodes because of the passive ureteral dilatation despite still presenting the mucous tissue expulsion in the urine. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Passive ureteral dilatation with Double-J stents could possibly be an effective treatment for patients with recurrent renal colic secondary to persistent renal papillae necrosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"526-529"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803271/pdf/cren.2020.0141.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38829009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-29eCollection Date: 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1089/cren.2020.0174
João Rafael Silva Simões Estrela, Alexandre A Ziomkowski, Frederico Mascarenhas, André Costa Matos
Background: Ganglioneuroma is a rare tumor derived from the neural crest that can occur in any sympathetic tissue. It corresponds to 0.3% to 2% of incidental adrenal tumors and <250 have been reported in the literature so far. Case Presentation: We present a case of a 30-year-old Caucasian woman presented with a large bilobed adrenal tumor found on a CT scan during the investigation of acute abdominal pain. The image also showed a rare anatomic variation of a left-sided inferior vena cava. Biochemical work-up for adrenal incidentaloma showed normal markers. Since we could not rule out malignancy, the patient was subjected to laparoscopic adrenalectomy and the pathology report showed an adrenal ganglioneuroma, a rare nonfunctioning tumor of the adrenal. Conclusion: Ganglioneuroma can present as a large bilobed adrenal tumor. The laparoscopic approach is feasible and safe. Preoperative planning is needed and vascular variations can be challenging during the procedure.
{"title":"A Rare Case of an Adrenal Ganglioneuroma Treated Laparoscopically in a Patient with Left-Sided Inferior Vena Cava.","authors":"João Rafael Silva Simões Estrela, Alexandre A Ziomkowski, Frederico Mascarenhas, André Costa Matos","doi":"10.1089/cren.2020.0174","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2020.0174","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Ganglioneuroma is a rare tumor derived from the neural crest that can occur in any sympathetic tissue. It corresponds to 0.3% to 2% of incidental adrenal tumors and <250 have been reported in the literature so far. <b><i>Case Presentation:</i></b> We present a case of a 30-year-old Caucasian woman presented with a large bilobed adrenal tumor found on a CT scan during the investigation of acute abdominal pain. The image also showed a rare anatomic variation of a left-sided inferior vena cava. Biochemical work-up for adrenal incidentaloma showed normal markers. Since we could not rule out malignancy, the patient was subjected to laparoscopic adrenalectomy and the pathology report showed an adrenal ganglioneuroma, a rare nonfunctioning tumor of the adrenal. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Ganglioneuroma can present as a large bilobed adrenal tumor. The laparoscopic approach is feasible and safe. Preoperative planning is needed and vascular variations can be challenging during the procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"530-532"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803268/pdf/cren.2020.0174.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38829010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-29eCollection Date: 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1089/cren.2020.0028
Yuyi Yeow, Luis Enrique Ortega-Polledo, Mario Basulto-Martínez, Giuseppe Saitta, Ilenia Rapallo, Silvia Proietti, Franco Gaboardi, Guido Giusti
Background: Selective renal artery angioembolization is the first treatment option in case of significant bleeding after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Migration of embolization material into the collecting system is extremely rare. The treatment of this condition is not standardized, but manual extraction, ultrasound fragmentation, and holmium laser lithotripsy have been described. Case presentation: We report the laser extraction of these coils in two patients at our center with two different approaches: retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS). They were young male patients aged 25 and 29 years at the time of surgery, and they were 2-5 years postembolization when they presented to our center for symptoms such as hematuria and passage of small stone fragments. The first patient was managed solely with RIRS, whereas the second patient required ECIRS because of significant bleeding after coil removal, which necessitated hemostasis using a resectoscope. Conclusion: For patients who present with recurrent stones or other symptoms such as pain, hematuria, or flank pain, the diagnosis of migrated embolization coils should be considered. Management can be via the retrograde or percutaneous approach, but in the setting of significant amount of migrated coils or significant bleeding after their removal, percutaneous access may allow more definitive hemostasis.
{"title":"Endourologic Treatment of Late Migration of Embolization Causing Nephrolithiasis in Two Patients.","authors":"Yuyi Yeow, Luis Enrique Ortega-Polledo, Mario Basulto-Martínez, Giuseppe Saitta, Ilenia Rapallo, Silvia Proietti, Franco Gaboardi, Guido Giusti","doi":"10.1089/cren.2020.0028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2020.0028","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Selective renal artery angioembolization is the first treatment option in case of significant bleeding after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Migration of embolization material into the collecting system is extremely rare. The treatment of this condition is not standardized, but manual extraction, ultrasound fragmentation, and holmium laser lithotripsy have been described. <b><i>Case presentation:</i></b> We report the laser extraction of these coils in two patients at our center with two different approaches: retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS). They were young male patients aged 25 and 29 years at the time of surgery, and they were 2-5 years postembolization when they presented to our center for symptoms such as hematuria and passage of small stone fragments. The first patient was managed solely with RIRS, whereas the second patient required ECIRS because of significant bleeding after coil removal, which necessitated hemostasis using a resectoscope. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> For patients who present with recurrent stones or other symptoms such as pain, hematuria, or flank pain, the diagnosis of migrated embolization coils should be considered. Management can be via the retrograde or percutaneous approach, but in the setting of significant amount of migrated coils or significant bleeding after their removal, percutaneous access may allow more definitive hemostasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"278-282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/cren.2020.0028","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38829931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Cutaneous vesicostomy is a urinary diversion for chronic urinary retention caused by neurogenic bladder. In this procedure, urine is drained directly from the bladder into a pouch attached to the lower abdomen, where the use of a catheter is unnecessary. Although complications of this procedure have been described, such as stoma stenosis, bladder prolapse, bladder calculi, and peristomal dermatitis, it is useful for patients who have difficulty with permanent bladder catheterization. The laparoscopy-assisted technique for cutaneous vesicostomy has not been described in the existing literature. In this report, we describe the case of an adult patient with chronic urinary retention caused by a neurogenic bladder who underwent laparoscopy-assisted cutaneous vesicostomy. Case Presentation: A 61-year-old man with intellectual disability was referred to our department because of macroscopic hematuria and urinary retention. Abdominal ultrasonography and computed tomography images showed excessive bladder dilation and bilateral hydronephrosis. A left kidney tumor was found incidentally. We diagnosed left renal carcinoma and chronic urinary retention caused by a neurogenic bladder. We suspected that the hematuria resulted from the renal cancer or from mucosal or submucosal vessel injury caused by excessive dilation of the bladder. Because of the patient's intellectual disability, self-intermittent catheterization or management of a urethral catheter was not possible. Therefore, we performed left radical nephrectomy laparoscopically followed by laparoscopy-assisted cutaneous vesicostomy under general anesthesia. By using laparoscopy, we could construct the vesicostomy in the bladder dome with less tension, and no stomal complications had occurred at 7 months postoperatively. Conclusion: Laparoscopy-assisted cutaneous vesicostomy was a safe and feasible surgical technique in our adult patient with chronic urinary retention. This procedure may be considered effective for patients having difficulty with permanent urinary catheterization.
{"title":"Laparoscopy-Assisted Cutaneous Vesicostomy in Combination with Radical Nephrectomy in an Adult Patient with Neurogenic Bladder and Difficulty with Permanent Urinary Catheterization.","authors":"Atsuhiko Ochi, Koichi Aikawa, Natsuo Kimura, Hirokazu Abe","doi":"10.1089/cren.2020.0030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2020.0030","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cutaneous vesicostomy is a urinary diversion for chronic urinary retention caused by neurogenic bladder. In this procedure, urine is drained directly from the bladder into a pouch attached to the lower abdomen, where the use of a catheter is unnecessary. Although complications of this procedure have been described, such as stoma stenosis, bladder prolapse, bladder calculi, and peristomal dermatitis, it is useful for patients who have difficulty with permanent bladder catheterization. The laparoscopy-assisted technique for cutaneous vesicostomy has not been described in the existing literature. In this report, we describe the case of an adult patient with chronic urinary retention caused by a neurogenic bladder who underwent laparoscopy-assisted cutaneous vesicostomy. Case Presentation: A 61-year-old man with intellectual disability was referred to our department because of macroscopic hematuria and urinary retention. Abdominal ultrasonography and computed tomography images showed excessive bladder dilation and bilateral hydronephrosis. A left kidney tumor was found incidentally. We diagnosed left renal carcinoma and chronic urinary retention caused by a neurogenic bladder. We suspected that the hematuria resulted from the renal cancer or from mucosal or submucosal vessel injury caused by excessive dilation of the bladder. Because of the patient's intellectual disability, self-intermittent catheterization or management of a urethral catheter was not possible. Therefore, we performed left radical nephrectomy laparoscopically followed by laparoscopy-assisted cutaneous vesicostomy under general anesthesia. By using laparoscopy, we could construct the vesicostomy in the bladder dome with less tension, and no stomal complications had occurred at 7 months postoperatively. Conclusion: Laparoscopy-assisted cutaneous vesicostomy was a safe and feasible surgical technique in our adult patient with chronic urinary retention. This procedure may be considered effective for patients having difficulty with permanent urinary catheterization.","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"291-296"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803200/pdf/cren.2020.0030.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38829934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}