首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Endourology Case Reports最新文献

英文 中文
A Case Series of Delayed Proximal Ureteral Strictures After Nephron-Sparing Treatment of Renal Masses. 保留肾块治疗后迟发性输尿管近端狭窄一例。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-12-29 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.1089/cren.2020.0182
Alexander K Chow, Rohit Bhatt, David Cao, Brandon Wahba, Christopher L Coogan, Srinivas Vourganti, Edward E Cherullo, Sam B Bhayani, Ramakrishna J Venkatesh, Robert Sherb Figenshau

Background: Delayed proximal ureteral stricture (DPUS) after nephron-sparing treatment (partial nephrectomy [PN] and image-guided percutaneous ablation) of renal masses is a rare complication that occurs because of an unrecognized injury to the proximal ureter and/or its associated vascular supply. We present a multi-institutional series of patients who developed DPUS after nephron-sparing treatment and review relevant tumor characteristics, timing of DPUS presentation, presenting symptoms, and outcome of stricture management. Case Presentation: Between 2000 and 2019, nine patients (five PN and four ablation) were found to have DPUS diagnosed at an average of 9 (6-119) months after PN and 5.5 (1-6) after ablation. Average tumor size was 4.5 (2.9-7.3) cm and 3.6 (3-4.1) cm for those treated with PN and ablation, respectively. Nephrometry score was 8.3 (6-11) and 6.5 (5-8), respectively. For resected tumors, all were located in the lower pole, but uniformity was not found as far as medial vs lateral (3 vs 2), anterior vs posterior (2 vs 2, 1 N/A), and right vs left (3 vs 2). For ablated tumors, all four tumors were right sided, anterior, medial, and lower pole. Initial signs and symptoms include sepsis (2), flank pain (5), and asymptomatic hydronephrosis (2). Concomitant urinoma (2) and retroperitoneal abscess (1) was found on imaging. Initial management included ureteral stenting (5) and percutaneous nephrostomy tube (4). Three underwent nephrectomy. Two had spontaneous resolution of DPUS after a course of ureteral stenting. Conclusion: Potential risk factors associated with DPUS after nephron-sparing treatment, including medial and lower pole tumors, and particularly right-sided anterior masses for ablation and higher complexity nephrometry score for PN. Recognition of delayed symptoms and imaging abnormalities in the surveillance period should cue clinical suspicion to DPUS.

背景:肾肿块保留肾脏治疗(部分肾切除术和图像引导下的经皮消融)后的延迟性输尿管近端狭窄(DPUS)是一种罕见的并发症,因为输尿管近端和/或其相关血管供应未被识别损伤。我们报道了一组在保留肾单元治疗后发生DPUS的多机构患者,并回顾了相关的肿瘤特征、DPUS出现的时间、表现症状和狭窄处理的结果。病例介绍:在2000年至2019年期间,发现9例患者(5例PN和4例消融)在PN后平均9(6-119)个月和消融后平均5.5(1-6)个月诊断出DPUS。PN组和消融组的平均肿瘤大小分别为4.5 (2.9-7.3)cm和3.6 (3-4.1)cm。肾脏测量评分分别为8.3(6-11)和6.5(5-8)。对于切除的肿瘤,所有肿瘤都位于下极,但在内侧vs外侧(3 vs 2),前部vs后部(2 vs 2, 1 N/A)和右侧vs左侧(3 vs 2)方面没有发现均匀性。对于消融的肿瘤,所有四个肿瘤都位于右侧,前,内侧和下极。最初的体征和症状包括脓毒症(2)、侧腹疼痛(5)和无症状肾积水(2)。影像学检查发现伴有尿瘤(2)和腹膜后脓肿(1)。最初的治疗包括输尿管支架置入术(5例)和经皮肾造口管(4例)。3例行肾切除术。2例在输尿管支架放置一个疗程后DPUS自行消退。结论:保留肾单元治疗后DPUS的潜在危险因素包括内侧和下极肿瘤,特别是右侧前肿瘤消融和更高的复杂性肾测量评分。在监测期间识别延迟症状和影像学异常应提示临床怀疑DPUS。
{"title":"A Case Series of Delayed Proximal Ureteral Strictures After Nephron-Sparing Treatment of Renal Masses.","authors":"Alexander K Chow,&nbsp;Rohit Bhatt,&nbsp;David Cao,&nbsp;Brandon Wahba,&nbsp;Christopher L Coogan,&nbsp;Srinivas Vourganti,&nbsp;Edward E Cherullo,&nbsp;Sam B Bhayani,&nbsp;Ramakrishna J Venkatesh,&nbsp;Robert Sherb Figenshau","doi":"10.1089/cren.2020.0182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2020.0182","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Delayed proximal ureteral stricture (DPUS) after nephron-sparing treatment (partial nephrectomy [PN] and image-guided percutaneous ablation) of renal masses is a rare complication that occurs because of an unrecognized injury to the proximal ureter and/or its associated vascular supply. We present a multi-institutional series of patients who developed DPUS after nephron-sparing treatment and review relevant tumor characteristics, timing of DPUS presentation, presenting symptoms, and outcome of stricture management. <b><i>Case Presentation:</i></b> Between 2000 and 2019, nine patients (five PN and four ablation) were found to have DPUS diagnosed at an average of 9 (6-119) months after PN and 5.5 (1-6) after ablation. Average tumor size was 4.5 (2.9-7.3) cm and 3.6 (3-4.1) cm for those treated with PN and ablation, respectively. Nephrometry score was 8.3 (6-11) and 6.5 (5-8), respectively. For resected tumors, all were located in the lower pole, but uniformity was not found as far as medial <i>vs</i> lateral (3 <i>vs</i> 2), anterior <i>vs</i> posterior (2 <i>vs</i> 2, 1 N/A), and right <i>vs</i> left (3 <i>vs</i> 2). For ablated tumors, all four tumors were right sided, anterior, medial, and lower pole. Initial signs and symptoms include sepsis (2), flank pain (5), and asymptomatic hydronephrosis (2). Concomitant urinoma (2) and retroperitoneal abscess (1) was found on imaging. Initial management included ureteral stenting (5) and percutaneous nephrostomy tube (4). Three underwent nephrectomy. Two had spontaneous resolution of DPUS after a course of ureteral stenting. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Potential risk factors associated with DPUS after nephron-sparing treatment, including medial and lower pole tumors, and particularly right-sided anterior masses for ablation and higher complexity nephrometry score for PN. Recognition of delayed symptoms and imaging abnormalities in the surveillance period should cue clinical suspicion to DPUS.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"544-547"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803190/pdf/cren.2020.0182.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38832366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Robot-Assisted Complete Urinary Tract Extirpation in a Patient with Simultaneous Panurothelial Carcinoma: A Case Report. 机器人辅助全尿路切除术治疗并发全尿路上皮癌1例报告。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-12-29 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.1089/cren.2020.0189
Albert Carrion, Carles Raventós, Fernando Lozano, Maria E Semidey, Ignasi Gallardo, Enrique Trilla

Background: Despite concomitant bladder and upper urinary tract cancers are present in 17% of cases, the simultaneous affection of the urethra, bladder, and both upper urinary tracts is extremely rare. Treatment decisions in this setting could be challenging because of the lack of evidence in the literature. Case Presentation: A 65-year-old Caucasian man with a history of nine low-grade (LG) and multifocal bladder tumor recurrences during the past 4 years is referred to our department with a newly diagnosed panurothelial carcinoma involving the bladder, urethra, and both upper urinary tracts. Because of the large and recurrent LG bladder tumor, the urethral involvement and the presence of bilateral pyelocaliceal tumors >4 cm the patient underwent a robot-assisted complete urinary tract extirpation (CUTE). Operating time was 360 minutes and blood loss 460 mL. No intraoperative complications were reported and blood transfusion was not required. The patient developed a surgical site infection in the glans that was solved with antibiotics without any other postoperative complication. He started renal replacement therapy and was discharged 6 days after the surgery. Pathologic analysis showed multifocal urothelial carcinomas; pTa LG involving the bladder and the prostatic-bulbar-membranous-penile urethra, pT3 high grade (HG) in right renal pelvis, pT1 HG in left renal pelvis, and pN0 in pelvic lymph node dissection. After a reasonable free-recurrence period of time the patient could be evaluated for a robot-assisted intracorporeal urinary diversion in preparation for a later renal transplantation. Conclusion: Robot-assisted CUTE could be a feasible and safe technique for selected patients with simultaneous panurothelial carcinoma. Further multicentric studies are warranted to determine the safety of this minimally invasive approach in patients with different comorbidities.

背景:尽管17%的病例存在膀胱和上尿路癌,但同时影响尿道、膀胱和上尿路的病例极为罕见。由于文献中缺乏证据,在这种情况下的治疗决策可能具有挑战性。病例介绍:一名65岁的白人男性,在过去的4年里有9次低级别(LG)和多灶性膀胱肿瘤复发的病史,他被转介到我科,新诊断为膀胱、尿道和双上尿路的全尿路上皮癌。由于大且复发的LG膀胱肿瘤,累及尿道和双侧肾盂局部肿瘤>4厘米,患者接受了机器人辅助的全尿路切除(CUTE)。手术时间360分钟,出血量460 mL。术中无并发症,无需输血。患者出现手术部位龟头感染,用抗生素治疗,无其他术后并发症。患者开始肾脏替代治疗,术后6天出院。病理分析为多灶性尿路上皮癌;pTa LG累及膀胱和前列腺-球-膜-阴茎尿道,pT3高分级(HG)在右肾盂,pT1 HG在左肾盂,pN0在盆腔淋巴结清扫。经过一段合理的无复发期后,患者可以评估机器人辅助的体内尿转移,为以后的肾移植做准备。结论:机器人辅助的全尿路上皮细胞癌治疗是一种安全可行的方法。需要进一步的多中心研究来确定这种微创入路在不同合并症患者中的安全性。
{"title":"A Robot-Assisted Complete Urinary Tract Extirpation in a Patient with Simultaneous Panurothelial Carcinoma: A Case Report.","authors":"Albert Carrion,&nbsp;Carles Raventós,&nbsp;Fernando Lozano,&nbsp;Maria E Semidey,&nbsp;Ignasi Gallardo,&nbsp;Enrique Trilla","doi":"10.1089/cren.2020.0189","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2020.0189","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Despite concomitant bladder and upper urinary tract cancers are present in 17% of cases, the simultaneous affection of the urethra, bladder, and both upper urinary tracts is extremely rare. Treatment decisions in this setting could be challenging because of the lack of evidence in the literature. <b><i>Case Presentation:</i></b> A 65-year-old Caucasian man with a history of nine low-grade (LG) and multifocal bladder tumor recurrences during the past 4 years is referred to our department with a newly diagnosed panurothelial carcinoma involving the bladder, urethra, and both upper urinary tracts. Because of the large and recurrent LG bladder tumor, the urethral involvement and the presence of bilateral pyelocaliceal tumors >4 cm the patient underwent a robot-assisted complete urinary tract extirpation (CUTE). Operating time was 360 minutes and blood loss 460 mL. No intraoperative complications were reported and blood transfusion was not required. The patient developed a surgical site infection in the glans that was solved with antibiotics without any other postoperative complication. He started renal replacement therapy and was discharged 6 days after the surgery. Pathologic analysis showed multifocal urothelial carcinomas; pTa LG involving the bladder and the prostatic-bulbar-membranous-penile urethra, pT3 high grade (HG) in right renal pelvis, pT1 HG in left renal pelvis, and pN0 in pelvic lymph node dissection. After a reasonable free-recurrence period of time the patient could be evaluated for a robot-assisted intracorporeal urinary diversion in preparation for a later renal transplantation. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Robot-assisted CUTE could be a feasible and safe technique for selected patients with simultaneous panurothelial carcinoma. Further multicentric studies are warranted to determine the safety of this minimally invasive approach in patients with different comorbidities.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"483-486"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803193/pdf/cren.2020.0189.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38828617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy 6 Months After Rectal Spacer Hydrogel Injection. 直肠间隔水凝胶注射后6个月机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-12-29 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.1089/cren.2020.0187
Mohammad Hout, David Sobel, Gyan Pareek, Sammy Elsamra

Background: SpaceOAR (organ at risk) hydrogel is a hydrogel matrix injected into the perirectal space posterior to the prostate for the purpose of mitigating radiation dose (and hence side effects of radiation) on the rectum. Manufacturer descriptions state that this material is reabsorbed 3 to 6 months after injection. Case Discussion: We encountered a 75-year old male patient who underwent SpaceOAR injection in anticipation for primary external beam radiation treatment for intermediate risk prostate cancer (Gleason score 7 = 4 + 3, prostate specific Antigen [PSA] = 2.32, cT2a). After initiation of androgen deprivation, but before radiotherapy, the patient decided to no longer undergo radiation but rather elected to proceed with surgery. Based on the presence of the SpaceOAR, we delayed his surgery to 6 months after SpaceOAR injection to allow for absorption of the material. A preoperative MRI showed persistent hydrogel matrix in the perirectal space. We performed a robotic radical prostatectomy effectively despite the persistent SpaceOAR hydrogel by modifying our dissection closer to the prostate posteriorly. Conclusion: SpaceOAR hydrogel may alter patient anatomy even 6 months after deployment, however, robotic prostatectomy would be feasible with proper knowledge of anatomy and by following the proper dissection planes above the perirectal space.

背景:SpaceOAR(危险器官)水凝胶是一种水凝胶基质,注射到前列腺后方的直肠周围间隙,目的是减轻直肠的辐射剂量(以及辐射的副作用)。制造商说明说明,该材料在注射后3至6个月被重新吸收。病例讨论:我们遇到了一位75岁的男性患者,他接受了SpaceOAR注射,预期接受原发性外束放射治疗中度前列腺癌(Gleason评分7 = 4 + 3,前列腺特异性抗原[PSA] = 2.32, cT2a)。在开始雄激素剥夺治疗后,但在放疗前,患者决定不再接受放疗,而是选择继续进行手术。基于SpaceOAR的存在,我们将他的手术推迟到SpaceOAR注射后6个月,以允许材料吸收。术前MRI显示直肠周围有持续的水凝胶基质。我们进行了机器人根治性前列腺切除术,尽管有持续存在的SpaceOAR水凝胶,但我们通过调整解剖结构,使其更靠近前列腺后方,有效地进行了根治性前列腺切除术。结论:SpaceOAR水凝胶在使用6个月后可能会改变患者的解剖结构,然而,只要具备适当的解剖学知识并遵循直肠周围间隙上方适当的解剖平面,机器人前列腺切除术是可行的。
{"title":"Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy 6 Months After Rectal Spacer Hydrogel Injection.","authors":"Mohammad Hout,&nbsp;David Sobel,&nbsp;Gyan Pareek,&nbsp;Sammy Elsamra","doi":"10.1089/cren.2020.0187","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2020.0187","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> SpaceOAR (organ at risk) hydrogel is a hydrogel matrix injected into the perirectal space posterior to the prostate for the purpose of mitigating radiation dose (and hence side effects of radiation) on the rectum. Manufacturer descriptions state that this material is reabsorbed 3 to 6 months after injection. <b><i>Case Discussion:</i></b> We encountered a 75-year old male patient who underwent SpaceOAR injection in anticipation for primary external beam radiation treatment for intermediate risk prostate cancer (Gleason score 7 = 4 + 3, prostate specific Antigen [PSA] = 2.32, cT2a). After initiation of androgen deprivation, but before radiotherapy, the patient decided to no longer undergo radiation but rather elected to proceed with surgery. Based on the presence of the SpaceOAR, we delayed his surgery to 6 months after SpaceOAR injection to allow for absorption of the material. A preoperative MRI showed persistent hydrogel matrix in the perirectal space. We performed a robotic radical prostatectomy effectively despite the persistent SpaceOAR hydrogel by modifying our dissection closer to the prostate posteriorly. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> SpaceOAR hydrogel may alter patient anatomy even 6 months after deployment, however, robotic prostatectomy would be feasible with proper knowledge of anatomy and by following the proper dissection planes above the perirectal space.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"454-456"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803204/pdf/cren.2020.0187.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38828640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Robotic Ureteral Bypass Surgery with Appendiceal Graft for Management of Long-Segment Radiation-Induced Distal Ureteral Strictures: A Case Series. 机器人输尿管旁路手术与阑尾移植治疗长段辐射引起的输尿管远端狭窄:一个病例系列。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-12-29 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.1089/cren.2020.0105
Matthew Lee, Ziho Lee, Michael J Metro, Daniel D Eun

Introduction: Surgical management of long-segment radiation-induced distal ureteral strictures (RIDUS) is challenging. Pelvic radiation can damage the bladder, inhibiting the utilization of typical reconstruction techniques such as a psoas hitch and/or Boari flap. Also, radiation can cause scarring that can make ureterolysis difficult. Case Presentation: We present a case series of patients undergoing robotic ureteral bypass surgery with appendiceal graft for management of strictures in this setting. This novel procedure utilizes the patient's appendix as a bypass graft to divert urine away from the strictured portion of ureter and into the bladder; this technique does not require dissection of the strictured ureteral segment. Conclusion: Robotic ureteral bypass surgery can be effective for management of long-segment RIDUS.

导言:长段放射引起的远端输尿管狭窄(RIDUS)的手术治疗具有挑战性。盆腔放射可损伤膀胱,抑制典型重建技术如腰肌结和/或Boari皮瓣的应用。此外,放射线还会造成疤痕,使输尿管溶解变得困难。病例介绍:我们提出了一个病例系列的病人接受机器人输尿管旁路手术与阑尾移植的管理在这种情况下的狭窄。这种新颖的手术利用患者的阑尾作为旁路移植物,将尿液从狭窄的输尿管部分转移到膀胱;该技术不需要切开狭窄的输尿管段。结论:机器人输尿管旁路手术是治疗长段RIDUS的有效方法。
{"title":"Robotic Ureteral Bypass Surgery with Appendiceal Graft for Management of Long-Segment Radiation-Induced Distal Ureteral Strictures: A Case Series.","authors":"Matthew Lee,&nbsp;Ziho Lee,&nbsp;Michael J Metro,&nbsp;Daniel D Eun","doi":"10.1089/cren.2020.0105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2020.0105","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Surgical management of long-segment radiation-induced distal ureteral strictures (RIDUS) is challenging. Pelvic radiation can damage the bladder, inhibiting the utilization of typical reconstruction techniques such as a psoas hitch and/or Boari flap. Also, radiation can cause scarring that can make ureterolysis difficult. <b><i>Case Presentation:</i></b> We present a case series of patients undergoing robotic ureteral bypass surgery with appendiceal graft for management of strictures in this setting. This novel procedure utilizes the patient's appendix as a bypass graft to divert urine away from the strictured portion of ureter and into the bladder; this technique does not require dissection of the strictured ureteral segment. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Robotic ureteral bypass surgery can be effective for management of long-segment RIDUS.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"305-309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803247/pdf/cren.2020.0105.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38828834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Minimally Invasive Approaches for Stone Clearance in Crossed Fused Renal Ectopia. 交叉融合性肾异位结石清除的微创方法。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-12-29 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.1089/cren.2020.0119
Ankur Bhatnagar, Manish Kumar Choudhary, Subhash Kumar

Crossed fused renal ectopia (CFRE) is a rare fusion anomaly of the kidneys, with a predisposition to calculus disease. Management of renal calculi in CFRE is not standardized because of paucity of literature. We managed a 32-year-old man with left to right CFRE with multiple stones in both the kidneys by percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the right moiety and laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for the crossed moiety. Based on the stone burden and anatomy, we decided to go for a staged approach, to provide maximum clearance rate with least risk. We share our experience in this case, with regard to the use of two different but minimally invasive modalities for effective management of the patient. We also emphasize on the utilization of a staged approach whenever required for patient safety. We also reviewed the literature regarding the management of kidney stones in this rare anomaly.

交叉融合肾异位(CFRE)是一种罕见的肾脏融合异常,具有结石疾病的易感性。由于文献的缺乏,CFRE肾结石的处理不规范。我们治疗了一名32岁的男性,患有左至右CFRE,双肾多发结石,经皮肾镜取石术治疗右侧部分,腹腔镜肾盂取石术治疗交叉部分。根据石头的负担和解剖结构,我们决定采用分阶段的方法,以最小的风险提供最大的清除率。我们在这个病例中分享我们的经验,关于使用两种不同但微创的方式来有效地管理患者。我们还强调在需要患者安全时采用分阶段方法。我们也回顾了有关这种罕见异常的肾结石处理的文献。
{"title":"Minimally Invasive Approaches for Stone Clearance in Crossed Fused Renal Ectopia.","authors":"Ankur Bhatnagar,&nbsp;Manish Kumar Choudhary,&nbsp;Subhash Kumar","doi":"10.1089/cren.2020.0119","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2020.0119","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Crossed fused renal ectopia (CFRE) is a rare fusion anomaly of the kidneys, with a predisposition to calculus disease. Management of renal calculi in CFRE is not standardized because of paucity of literature. We managed a 32-year-old man with left to right CFRE with multiple stones in both the kidneys by percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the right moiety and laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for the crossed moiety. Based on the stone burden and anatomy, we decided to go for a staged approach, to provide maximum clearance rate with least risk. We share our experience in this case, with regard to the use of two different but minimally invasive modalities for effective management of the patient. We also emphasize on the utilization of a staged approach whenever required for patient safety. We also reviewed the literature regarding the management of kidney stones in this rare anomaly.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"374-376"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803231/pdf/cren.2020.0119.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38828843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Injury to Biliary Tract During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Minimally Invasive Management of a Dreadful Complication. 经皮肾镜取石术中胆道损伤:一种可怕并发症的微创处理。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-12-29 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.1089/cren.2020.0038
Manas Sharma, Vikram Prabha, Shishir Devaraju

Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is an effective minimally invasive surgical modality for the management of renal calculi. It is generally considered safe with commonly encountered complications being urinary extravasation, fever, and bleeding. Injury to the biliary tract or puncture of the gallbladder is an extremely rare but a grave complication of PCNL. Case Presentation: We present a case of a 70-year-old man who underwent PCNL for an obstructing right renal pelvic calculus. Upon middle caliceal puncture to access the pelvicaliceal system, an unexpected green aspirate suggestive of bile was noted egressing through the puncture needle when stiletto was detached. The needle was swiftly withdrawn and percutaneous renal access was effective on the second puncture to complete the procedure. In the postoperative period, biliary ascites was confirmed on imaging, which was managed in a minimally invasive manner with an ultrasonography-guided abdominal drain insertion. The patient recovered well and was discharged home. Conclusion: Biliary ascites with or without peritonitis is a rare but potentially fatal consequence of biliary tract injury that can occur during PCNL. If there is recognition of biliary aspirate during a percutaneous renal procedure, aggressive management, including diverting the biliary fluid in appropriately selected cases, can obviate the need for emergent open or laparoscopic surgical intervention as highlighted in our case.

背景:经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)是治疗肾结石的一种有效的微创手术方式。它通常被认为是安全的,常见的并发症是尿外渗,发烧和出血。胆道损伤或胆囊穿刺极为罕见,但却是PCNL的严重并发症。病例介绍:我们提出了一个70岁的人谁接受PCNL为梗阻右肾盆腔结石。在中盆骨穿刺进入盆骨系统时,当细高跟鞋分离时,一个意想不到的绿色吸入物提示胆汁从穿刺针流出。针被迅速取出,经皮肾通道是有效的第二次穿刺完成程序。术后影像学证实胆道腹水,超声引导下行腹腔引管微创处理。病人恢复得很好,出院回家了。结论:胆道腹水伴或不伴腹膜炎是PCNL术中胆道损伤的一种罕见但可能致命的后果。如果在经皮肾手术过程中发现胆道吸入,积极的处理,包括在适当选择的病例中转移胆道液,可以避免紧急开放或腹腔镜手术干预的需要,正如本病例所强调的那样。
{"title":"Injury to Biliary Tract During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Minimally Invasive Management of a Dreadful Complication.","authors":"Manas Sharma,&nbsp;Vikram Prabha,&nbsp;Shishir Devaraju","doi":"10.1089/cren.2020.0038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2020.0038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is an effective minimally invasive surgical modality for the management of renal calculi. It is generally considered safe with commonly encountered complications being urinary extravasation, fever, and bleeding. Injury to the biliary tract or puncture of the gallbladder is an extremely rare but a grave complication of PCNL. <b><i>Case Presentation:</i></b> We present a case of a 70-year-old man who underwent PCNL for an obstructing right renal pelvic calculus. Upon middle caliceal puncture to access the pelvicaliceal system, an unexpected green aspirate suggestive of bile was noted egressing through the puncture needle when stiletto was detached. The needle was swiftly withdrawn and percutaneous renal access was effective on the second puncture to complete the procedure. In the postoperative period, biliary ascites was confirmed on imaging, which was managed in a minimally invasive manner with an ultrasonography-guided abdominal drain insertion. The patient recovered well and was discharged home. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Biliary ascites with or without peritonitis is a rare but potentially fatal consequence of biliary tract injury that can occur during PCNL. If there is recognition of biliary aspirate during a percutaneous renal procedure, aggressive management, including diverting the biliary fluid in appropriately selected cases, can obviate the need for emergent open or laparoscopic surgical intervention as highlighted in our case.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"380-383"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/cren.2020.0038","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38828845","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Long-Term Passive Ureteral Dilatation with Double-J Stent: Possibly an Effective Treatment for Recurrent Renal Colic Caused by Papillary Renal Necrosis. 双j型输尿管支架长期被动扩张:可能是治疗乳头状肾坏死所致复发性肾绞痛的有效方法。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-12-29 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.1089/cren.2020.0141
Braulio O Manzo, Eduardo Tejeda, Ben H Chew, Pompeyo Alarcon, Edson Flores, J Ernesto Torres

Background: An uncommon cause of recurrent renal colic is mucous tissue passage secondary to renal papillae necrosis. Because of its low prevalence, the correct management of recurrent obstructive uropathy produced by renal papillary necrosis (RPN) is not well defined. Case Presentation: We present a case of recurrent renal colic associated with the expulsion of mucous tissue in a young woman's urine with a history of excessive consumption of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The patient required multiple admissions to the emergency department because of recurrent episodes of renal colic. A retrograde pyelogram and histopathologic study of the expulsed tissue supported the diagnosis of RPN. The patient was managed with Double-J stents for 12 months, complete withdrawal of NSAIDs, and large volume intake of water. A satisfactory outcome was seen radiologically and endoscopically after treatment. The patient stopped experiencing new renal colic episodes because of the passive ureteral dilatation despite still presenting the mucous tissue expulsion in the urine. Conclusions: Passive ureteral dilatation with Double-J stents could possibly be an effective treatment for patients with recurrent renal colic secondary to persistent renal papillae necrosis.

背景:复发性肾绞痛的不常见原因是继发于肾乳头坏死的粘膜组织通道。由于其发病率低,肾乳头状坏死(RPN)引起的复发性梗阻性尿病的正确处理尚不明确。病例介绍:我们提出了一个病例复发性肾绞痛与排泄粘膜组织在一个年轻的妇女的尿液与历史过量消耗非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)。由于肾绞痛反复发作,患者多次入院急诊。排出组织的肾盂造影和组织病理学检查支持RPN的诊断。患者接受双j型支架治疗12个月,完全停用非甾体抗炎药,并大量饮水。治疗后放射学和内窥镜检查结果满意。患者不再经历新的肾绞痛发作,因为被动输尿管扩张,尽管仍有尿中粘膜组织排出。结论:被动输尿管扩张联合双j支架可能是治疗持续性肾乳头坏死所致复发性肾绞痛的有效方法。
{"title":"Long-Term Passive Ureteral Dilatation with Double-J Stent: Possibly an Effective Treatment for Recurrent Renal Colic Caused by Papillary Renal Necrosis.","authors":"Braulio O Manzo,&nbsp;Eduardo Tejeda,&nbsp;Ben H Chew,&nbsp;Pompeyo Alarcon,&nbsp;Edson Flores,&nbsp;J Ernesto Torres","doi":"10.1089/cren.2020.0141","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2020.0141","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> An uncommon cause of recurrent renal colic is mucous tissue passage secondary to renal papillae necrosis. Because of its low prevalence, the correct management of recurrent obstructive uropathy produced by renal papillary necrosis (RPN) is not well defined. <b><i>Case Presentation:</i></b> We present a case of recurrent renal colic associated with the expulsion of mucous tissue in a young woman's urine with a history of excessive consumption of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The patient required multiple admissions to the emergency department because of recurrent episodes of renal colic. A retrograde pyelogram and histopathologic study of the expulsed tissue supported the diagnosis of RPN. The patient was managed with Double-J stents for 12 months, complete withdrawal of NSAIDs, and large volume intake of water. A satisfactory outcome was seen radiologically and endoscopically after treatment. The patient stopped experiencing new renal colic episodes because of the passive ureteral dilatation despite still presenting the mucous tissue expulsion in the urine. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Passive ureteral dilatation with Double-J stents could possibly be an effective treatment for patients with recurrent renal colic secondary to persistent renal papillae necrosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"526-529"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803271/pdf/cren.2020.0141.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38829009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
A Rare Case of an Adrenal Ganglioneuroma Treated Laparoscopically in a Patient with Left-Sided Inferior Vena Cava. 腹腔镜治疗左侧下腔静脉少见肾上腺神经节神经瘤1例。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-12-29 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.1089/cren.2020.0174
João Rafael Silva Simões Estrela, Alexandre A Ziomkowski, Frederico Mascarenhas, André Costa Matos

Background: Ganglioneuroma is a rare tumor derived from the neural crest that can occur in any sympathetic tissue. It corresponds to 0.3% to 2% of incidental adrenal tumors and <250 have been reported in the literature so far. Case Presentation: We present a case of a 30-year-old Caucasian woman presented with a large bilobed adrenal tumor found on a CT scan during the investigation of acute abdominal pain. The image also showed a rare anatomic variation of a left-sided inferior vena cava. Biochemical work-up for adrenal incidentaloma showed normal markers. Since we could not rule out malignancy, the patient was subjected to laparoscopic adrenalectomy and the pathology report showed an adrenal ganglioneuroma, a rare nonfunctioning tumor of the adrenal. Conclusion: Ganglioneuroma can present as a large bilobed adrenal tumor. The laparoscopic approach is feasible and safe. Preoperative planning is needed and vascular variations can be challenging during the procedure.

背景:神经节神经瘤是一种罕见的源自神经嵴的肿瘤,可发生于任何交感神经组织。它对应于0.3%至2%的偶发肾上腺肿瘤和病例介绍:我们报告一例30岁的高加索女性,在急性腹痛的CT扫描中发现一个大的双叶肾上腺肿瘤。图像也显示了一个罕见的解剖变异左侧下腔静脉。肾上腺偶发瘤生化检查指标正常。由于不能排除恶性肿瘤,我们对患者进行了腹腔镜肾上腺切除术,病理报告显示为肾上腺神经节神经瘤,这是一种罕见的肾上腺无功能肿瘤。结论:神经节神经瘤可表现为大的双叶肾上腺肿瘤。腹腔镜入路可行且安全。术前计划是必要的,在手术过程中血管变异可能具有挑战性。
{"title":"A Rare Case of an Adrenal Ganglioneuroma Treated Laparoscopically in a Patient with Left-Sided Inferior Vena Cava.","authors":"João Rafael Silva Simões Estrela,&nbsp;Alexandre A Ziomkowski,&nbsp;Frederico Mascarenhas,&nbsp;André Costa Matos","doi":"10.1089/cren.2020.0174","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2020.0174","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Ganglioneuroma is a rare tumor derived from the neural crest that can occur in any sympathetic tissue. It corresponds to 0.3% to 2% of incidental adrenal tumors and <250 have been reported in the literature so far. <b><i>Case Presentation:</i></b> We present a case of a 30-year-old Caucasian woman presented with a large bilobed adrenal tumor found on a CT scan during the investigation of acute abdominal pain. The image also showed a rare anatomic variation of a left-sided inferior vena cava. Biochemical work-up for adrenal incidentaloma showed normal markers. Since we could not rule out malignancy, the patient was subjected to laparoscopic adrenalectomy and the pathology report showed an adrenal ganglioneuroma, a rare nonfunctioning tumor of the adrenal. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Ganglioneuroma can present as a large bilobed adrenal tumor. The laparoscopic approach is feasible and safe. Preoperative planning is needed and vascular variations can be challenging during the procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"530-532"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803268/pdf/cren.2020.0174.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38829010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Endourologic Treatment of Late Migration of Embolization Causing Nephrolithiasis in Two Patients. 栓塞晚移致肾结石2例的腔内治疗。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-12-29 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.1089/cren.2020.0028
Yuyi Yeow, Luis Enrique Ortega-Polledo, Mario Basulto-Martínez, Giuseppe Saitta, Ilenia Rapallo, Silvia Proietti, Franco Gaboardi, Guido Giusti

Background: Selective renal artery angioembolization is the first treatment option in case of significant bleeding after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Migration of embolization material into the collecting system is extremely rare. The treatment of this condition is not standardized, but manual extraction, ultrasound fragmentation, and holmium laser lithotripsy have been described. Case presentation: We report the laser extraction of these coils in two patients at our center with two different approaches: retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS). They were young male patients aged 25 and 29 years at the time of surgery, and they were 2-5 years postembolization when they presented to our center for symptoms such as hematuria and passage of small stone fragments. The first patient was managed solely with RIRS, whereas the second patient required ECIRS because of significant bleeding after coil removal, which necessitated hemostasis using a resectoscope. Conclusion: For patients who present with recurrent stones or other symptoms such as pain, hematuria, or flank pain, the diagnosis of migrated embolization coils should be considered. Management can be via the retrograde or percutaneous approach, but in the setting of significant amount of migrated coils or significant bleeding after their removal, percutaneous access may allow more definitive hemostasis.

背景:选择性肾动脉血管栓塞术是经皮肾镜取石术后大量出血的首选治疗方法。栓塞物质迁移到收集系统是极为罕见的。这种情况的治疗没有标准化,但已经描述了人工提取,超声碎裂和钬激光碎石。病例介绍:我们报告了我们中心的两例患者采用两种不同的方法:逆行肾内手术(RIRS)和内窥镜联合肾内手术(ECIRS)激光提取这些线圈。患者为年轻男性,手术时年龄分别为25岁和29岁,栓塞后2-5年,因血尿、小结石通过等症状来我院就诊。第一位患者仅使用RIRS进行治疗,而第二位患者由于线圈移除后出血严重,需要使用切除镜止血,因此需要ECIRS。结论:对于复发性结石或出现疼痛、血尿、腹侧疼痛等其他症状的患者,应考虑栓塞线圈移位的诊断。治疗可通过逆行或经皮入路,但在线圈大量迁移或取出后出血严重的情况下,经皮入路可实现更明确的止血。
{"title":"Endourologic Treatment of Late Migration of Embolization Causing Nephrolithiasis in Two Patients.","authors":"Yuyi Yeow,&nbsp;Luis Enrique Ortega-Polledo,&nbsp;Mario Basulto-Martínez,&nbsp;Giuseppe Saitta,&nbsp;Ilenia Rapallo,&nbsp;Silvia Proietti,&nbsp;Franco Gaboardi,&nbsp;Guido Giusti","doi":"10.1089/cren.2020.0028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2020.0028","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Selective renal artery angioembolization is the first treatment option in case of significant bleeding after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Migration of embolization material into the collecting system is extremely rare. The treatment of this condition is not standardized, but manual extraction, ultrasound fragmentation, and holmium laser lithotripsy have been described. <b><i>Case presentation:</i></b> We report the laser extraction of these coils in two patients at our center with two different approaches: retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS). They were young male patients aged 25 and 29 years at the time of surgery, and they were 2-5 years postembolization when they presented to our center for symptoms such as hematuria and passage of small stone fragments. The first patient was managed solely with RIRS, whereas the second patient required ECIRS because of significant bleeding after coil removal, which necessitated hemostasis using a resectoscope. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> For patients who present with recurrent stones or other symptoms such as pain, hematuria, or flank pain, the diagnosis of migrated embolization coils should be considered. Management can be via the retrograde or percutaneous approach, but in the setting of significant amount of migrated coils or significant bleeding after their removal, percutaneous access may allow more definitive hemostasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"278-282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/cren.2020.0028","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38829931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laparoscopy-Assisted Cutaneous Vesicostomy in Combination with Radical Nephrectomy in an Adult Patient with Neurogenic Bladder and Difficulty with Permanent Urinary Catheterization. 腹腔镜辅助皮肤膀胱造口术联合根治性肾切除术治疗1例神经源性膀胱伴永久导尿困难的成人患者。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-12-29 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.1089/cren.2020.0030
Atsuhiko Ochi, Koichi Aikawa, Natsuo Kimura, Hirokazu Abe
Background: Cutaneous vesicostomy is a urinary diversion for chronic urinary retention caused by neurogenic bladder. In this procedure, urine is drained directly from the bladder into a pouch attached to the lower abdomen, where the use of a catheter is unnecessary. Although complications of this procedure have been described, such as stoma stenosis, bladder prolapse, bladder calculi, and peristomal dermatitis, it is useful for patients who have difficulty with permanent bladder catheterization. The laparoscopy-assisted technique for cutaneous vesicostomy has not been described in the existing literature. In this report, we describe the case of an adult patient with chronic urinary retention caused by a neurogenic bladder who underwent laparoscopy-assisted cutaneous vesicostomy. Case Presentation: A 61-year-old man with intellectual disability was referred to our department because of macroscopic hematuria and urinary retention. Abdominal ultrasonography and computed tomography images showed excessive bladder dilation and bilateral hydronephrosis. A left kidney tumor was found incidentally. We diagnosed left renal carcinoma and chronic urinary retention caused by a neurogenic bladder. We suspected that the hematuria resulted from the renal cancer or from mucosal or submucosal vessel injury caused by excessive dilation of the bladder. Because of the patient's intellectual disability, self-intermittent catheterization or management of a urethral catheter was not possible. Therefore, we performed left radical nephrectomy laparoscopically followed by laparoscopy-assisted cutaneous vesicostomy under general anesthesia. By using laparoscopy, we could construct the vesicostomy in the bladder dome with less tension, and no stomal complications had occurred at 7 months postoperatively. Conclusion: Laparoscopy-assisted cutaneous vesicostomy was a safe and feasible surgical technique in our adult patient with chronic urinary retention. This procedure may be considered effective for patients having difficulty with permanent urinary catheterization.
背景:皮肤膀胱造口术是治疗神经源性膀胱引起的慢性尿潴留的一种尿转移方法。在这个过程中,尿液直接从膀胱排出到附在下腹的袋子中,在那里不需要使用导尿管。虽然该手术的并发症有报道,如造口狭窄、膀胱脱垂、膀胱结石和口周皮炎,但它对永久性膀胱导尿有困难的患者是有用的。腹腔镜辅助下的皮肤膀胱造口术在现有文献中尚未被描述。在这个报告中,我们描述了一例由神经源性膀胱引起的慢性尿潴留的成年患者,他接受了腹腔镜辅助皮肤膀胱造口术。病例介绍:一位61岁男性智障患者因肉眼可见的血尿和尿潴留而被转介到我科。腹部超声及电脑断层显示膀胱过度扩张及双侧肾积水。偶然发现左肾肿瘤。我们诊断左肾癌和慢性尿潴留引起的神经源性膀胱。我们怀疑血尿是由肾癌或膀胱过度扩张引起的粘膜或粘膜下血管损伤引起的。由于患者的智力残疾,不可能自行间歇置管或管理导尿管。因此,我们在全麻下行腹腔镜左肾根治术,然后行腹腔镜辅助皮肤膀胱造口术。术后7个月,腹腔镜下膀胱造口术的张力较小,无造口并发症发生。结论:腹腔镜辅助皮肤膀胱造口术治疗慢性尿潴留是一种安全可行的手术方法。这一程序可能被认为是有效的病人有困难的永久导尿。
{"title":"Laparoscopy-Assisted Cutaneous Vesicostomy in Combination with Radical Nephrectomy in an Adult Patient with Neurogenic Bladder and Difficulty with Permanent Urinary Catheterization.","authors":"Atsuhiko Ochi,&nbsp;Koichi Aikawa,&nbsp;Natsuo Kimura,&nbsp;Hirokazu Abe","doi":"10.1089/cren.2020.0030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2020.0030","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cutaneous vesicostomy is a urinary diversion for chronic urinary retention caused by neurogenic bladder. In this procedure, urine is drained directly from the bladder into a pouch attached to the lower abdomen, where the use of a catheter is unnecessary. Although complications of this procedure have been described, such as stoma stenosis, bladder prolapse, bladder calculi, and peristomal dermatitis, it is useful for patients who have difficulty with permanent bladder catheterization. The laparoscopy-assisted technique for cutaneous vesicostomy has not been described in the existing literature. In this report, we describe the case of an adult patient with chronic urinary retention caused by a neurogenic bladder who underwent laparoscopy-assisted cutaneous vesicostomy. Case Presentation: A 61-year-old man with intellectual disability was referred to our department because of macroscopic hematuria and urinary retention. Abdominal ultrasonography and computed tomography images showed excessive bladder dilation and bilateral hydronephrosis. A left kidney tumor was found incidentally. We diagnosed left renal carcinoma and chronic urinary retention caused by a neurogenic bladder. We suspected that the hematuria resulted from the renal cancer or from mucosal or submucosal vessel injury caused by excessive dilation of the bladder. Because of the patient's intellectual disability, self-intermittent catheterization or management of a urethral catheter was not possible. Therefore, we performed left radical nephrectomy laparoscopically followed by laparoscopy-assisted cutaneous vesicostomy under general anesthesia. By using laparoscopy, we could construct the vesicostomy in the bladder dome with less tension, and no stomal complications had occurred at 7 months postoperatively. Conclusion: Laparoscopy-assisted cutaneous vesicostomy was a safe and feasible surgical technique in our adult patient with chronic urinary retention. This procedure may be considered effective for patients having difficulty with permanent urinary catheterization.","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"291-296"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803200/pdf/cren.2020.0030.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38829934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
期刊
Journal of Endourology Case Reports
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1