Korean Journal of Neurotrauma最新文献

Objective: Since the establishment of Regional Trauma Centers (RTCs) in Korea, significant efforts have been made to improve the quality of care for patients with trauma. Simultaneously, the Department of Neurosurgery assigned neurotrauma specialists to RTCs to provide specialized care to patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). In this study, we sought to determine whether neurotrauma specialists, compared to general neurosurgeons, could make a significant difference in treatment outcomes of patients with TBI.

Methods: In total, 156 patients with acute TBI who required decompression were included. We reviewed their records and compared the characteristics, outcomes, and prognosis of those who received surgical treatment from either neurotrauma specialists or general neurosurgeons at our institution.

Results: A significant difference was observed between treatment by trauma neurosurgery specialists and general neurosurgeons in time to surgery, with trauma specialists experiencing shorter surgical delays. However, no significant differences existed in mortality rates or Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale scores. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses revealed that lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores, an abnormal pupil reflex, larger transfusion volume, and prolonged time from emergency room admission to surgery were associated with high mortality rates.

Conclusion: Neurotrauma specialists can provide prompt surgical treatment to patients with TBI compared to general neurosurgeons. Our study did not reveal a significant difference in outcomes between the two groups. However, it is clear that rapid decompression is effective in patients with impending brain herniation. Therefore, the effectiveness of neurotrauma specialists needs to be confirmed through further systematic studies.

In Part II, we focus on an important aspect of spine fusion in patients with spine trauma: the pivotal role of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2). Despite the influx of diverse techniques facilitated by technological advancements in spinal surgery, spinal fusion surgery remains widely used globally. The persistent challenge of spinal pseudarthrosis has driven extensive efforts to achieve clinically favorable fusion outcomes, with particular emphasis on the evolution of bone graft substitutes. Part II of this review aims to build upon the foundation laid out in Part I by providing a comprehensive summary of commonly utilized bone graft substitutes for spinal fusion in patients with spinal trauma. Additionally, it will delve into the latest advancements and insights regarding the application of rhBMP-2, offering an updated perspective on its role in enhancing the success of spinal fusion procedures.

Objective: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an independent risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). This study aimed to determine the optimal timing for initiating pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for VTE in patients with isolated severe TBI using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM).

Methods: This single-center observational study enrolled 115 patients aged 18-59 years with isolated severe TBI within the first 48 hours after injury.

Results: Using ROTEM data, we identified hypercoagulation due to an increase in clot density (MCF EXTEM >72), which was attributed to fibrinogen (MCF FIBTEM >25). From day 4, hypercoagulation occurred in 14.8% of the patients. By day 7, these changes were observed in 85.2% of patients. According to brain computed tomography findings, patients who received early VTE chemoprophylaxis on days 3-4 after severe TBI did not experience progression of hemorrhagic foci.

Conclusion: Our results emphasize the clinical significance of thromboelastometry in patients with isolated severe traumatic TBI. Anticoagulant prophylaxis started on 3-4 days after severe TBI was relatively safe, and most patients did not experience hemorrhagic foci progression. The data acquired in this study may enable the optimization of VTE chemoprophylactic approaches, thereby reducing the associated risks to patients.

Translation fracture of the lumbar spine is a rare but serious condition that necessitates prompt medical attention. This injury can cause nerve damage, spinal cord compression, and other complications that can affect motor function. The motoric outcomes of this fracture type depend on a variety of factors, including the severity and location of the fracture, the age and general health of the patient, and the timeliness and effectiveness of treatment. Accurate diagnosis and treatment of these injuries is important to prevent further neurological damage and improve motoric outcomes. Here we present the case of a male patient with a translation fracture at the L1-L2 level with AO spine type C who underwent immediate realignment and posterior stabilization, and subsequently participated in an early rehabilitation program, resulting in improved neurologic function. Thoracolumbar fracture with lateral dislocation is very rare and significant experience is needed to determine which management strategy can ensure the best outcome.

Objective: This study aims to explore the epidemiology and outcomes of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in Incheon, focusing on regional characteristics using data from a local trauma center.

Methods: From January 2018 to December 2022, 559 patients with severe TBI were studied. We analyzed factors related to demography, prehospitalization, surgery, complications, and clinical outcomes, including intensive care unit stay, ventilator use, hospital stay, mortality, and Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) scores at discharge and after 6 months.

Results: In this study, most severe TBI patients were in the 60-79 age range, constituting 37.4% of cases. Most patients (74.1%) used public emergency medical services for transportation, and 75.3% arrived directly at the hospital, a significantly higher proportion compared to transferred patients. Timewise, 40.0% reached the hospital within an hour of injury. Complication rates stood at 16.1%, with pneumonia being the most common. The mortality rate was 44.0%, and at discharge, 81.2% of patients had unfavorable outcomes (GOS 1-3), reducing to 70.1% at 6 months.

Conclusion: As a pioneering study at Incheon's trauma center, this research provides insights into severe TBI outcomes, enhancing understanding by contrasting local and national data.

Neurenteric cysts are rare and account for only 0.7%-1.3% of all spinal tumors. Spinal neurenteric cysts are associated with spina bifida, split-cord malformations, and Klippel-Feil syndrome, a rare congenital disorder characterized by fusion of two or more cervical vertebrae. Klippel-Feil syndrome is rarely accompanied by neurenteric cysts. In this case report, we describe a cervicothoracic junction neurenteric cyst associated with Klippel-Feil syndrome in a 30-year-old man who presented with a 2-month history of neck pain with radiation of pain into both arms and a 1-month history of weakness in the left arm. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine revealed an expansive intradural extramedullary cystic lesion anterior to the spinal cord at the cervicothoracic junction. The neurenteric cyst was removed using an anterior approach, accompanied by C5-C6 corpectomy. The patient's condition improved postoperatively, and he was discharged after postoperative MRI. Spinal neurenteric cysts should be considered in the differential diagnosis in cases of vertebral developmental abnormalities concurrent with intraspinal cysts.