首页 > 最新文献

Ireland, Migration and Return Migration最新文献

英文 中文
‘Quiet Men’
Pub Date : 2019-05-01 DOI: 10.3828/liverpool/9781786941800.003.0002
Sinéad Moynihan
This chapter examines fictional Returned Yanks – notably in Julia O’Faolain’s No Country for Young Men (1980), Benedict Kiely’s Nothing Happens in Carmincross (1985) and Roddy Doyle’s The Dead Republic (2010) – who become involved in and/or comment on the Northern Irish ‘Troubles.’ This conflict, through its resurgence in the late 1960s, challenged optimistic and prematurely celebratory attitudes towards Irish modernisation that claimed that nationalism and ‘atavistic’ ideological attachments would disappear through the modernisation process. However, an understanding of nationalism that sees insurgency as antithetical to modernity is fallacious for, as Benedict Anderson argued so influentially in Imagined Communities (1983), nationalism is a product of modernity. Many Troubles narratives feature Irish Americans whose parents or grandparents were involved in the nationalist struggle in the 1920s and who retain a recalcitrant commitment to the ideal of a united Ireland. In narratives of the Troubles, then, the Returned Yank is a kind of revenant or ghost from a past which the southern state – whose authority was profoundly undermined in the 1970s and 1980s by Northern republican challenges to its legitimacy – wishes to disavow.
这一章考察了虚构的“归来的美国人”——尤其是在朱莉娅·奥法莱恩的《青年无所依》(1980)、本尼迪克特·基利的《卡明克罗斯无事可为》(1985)和罗迪·道尔的《死亡共和国》(2010)中——他们卷入或评论了北爱尔兰的问题。这场冲突在20世纪60年代末重新抬头,挑战了对爱尔兰现代化的乐观和过早的庆祝态度,这种态度声称民族主义和“返祖”的意识形态依恋将在现代化过程中消失。然而,将叛乱视为现代性对立面的民族主义理解是错误的,因为正如本尼迪克特·安德森在《想象的共同体》(1983)中所言,民族主义是现代性的产物。许多《麻烦》的故事都以爱尔兰裔美国人为主角,他们的父母或祖父母参与了20世纪20年代的民族主义斗争,他们对统一爱尔兰的理想保持着顽强的承诺。因此,在对“麻烦”的叙述中,回归的美国人是一种来自过去的亡魂或幽灵,而在20世纪70年代和80年代,由于北方共和党对其合法性的挑战,南方各州的权威受到了极大的破坏,他们希望否认这一点。
{"title":"‘Quiet Men’","authors":"Sinéad Moynihan","doi":"10.3828/liverpool/9781786941800.003.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9781786941800.003.0002","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines fictional Returned Yanks – notably in Julia O’Faolain’s No Country for Young Men (1980), Benedict Kiely’s Nothing Happens in Carmincross (1985) and Roddy Doyle’s The Dead Republic (2010) – who become involved in and/or comment on the Northern Irish ‘Troubles.’ This conflict, through its resurgence in the late 1960s, challenged optimistic and prematurely celebratory attitudes towards Irish modernisation that claimed that nationalism and ‘atavistic’ ideological attachments would disappear through the modernisation process. However, an understanding of nationalism that sees insurgency as antithetical to modernity is fallacious for, as Benedict Anderson argued so influentially in Imagined Communities (1983), nationalism is a product of modernity. Many Troubles narratives feature Irish Americans whose parents or grandparents were involved in the nationalist struggle in the 1920s and who retain a recalcitrant commitment to the ideal of a united Ireland. In narratives of the Troubles, then, the Returned Yank is a kind of revenant or ghost from a past which the southern state – whose authority was profoundly undermined in the 1970s and 1980s by Northern republican challenges to its legitimacy – wishes to disavow.","PeriodicalId":369342,"journal":{"name":"Ireland, Migration and Return Migration","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132362779","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Erin’s Acres
Pub Date : 2019-05-01 DOI: 10.3828/liverpool/9781786941800.003.0004
Sinéad Moynihan
This chapter considers the extent to which the Returned Yank surfaces in narratives treating of land acquisition, distribution, ownership and development in Ireland in the second half of the twentieth century. It identifies two overlapping motifs in Returned Yank narratives that have been stated, restated and reworked in various historically-contingent ways from at least the 1930s, through the Lemassian turn, through the Celtic Tiger years: first, the extent to which the Returned Yank who returns to Ireland to buy property symbolises widespread ambivalence concerning the role of the post-independence Land Commission in Irish life; second, the degree to which narratives of land-purchasing (or ‘land-grabbing’) Returned Yanks become abstracted in the 1960s and beyond to the extent that s/he (usually he) comes to symbolise U.S. investment in Ireland more generally.
本章考察了20世纪下半叶爱尔兰土地获取、分配、所有权和发展的叙事中,“美国佬”的出现程度。它确定了至少从20世纪30年代开始,通过Lemassian转向,通过凯尔特之虎时期,在“回归的美国佬”叙事中以各种历史偶合的方式被陈述,重申和重新制作的两个重叠的主题:首先,回归爱尔兰购买房产的美国佬在一定程度上象征着关于独立后土地委员会在爱尔兰生活中的作用的普遍矛盾心理;其次,在20世纪60年代及以后,美国人购买土地(或“掠夺土地”)的叙述变得抽象的程度,以至于他/她(通常是他)更普遍地象征着美国在爱尔兰的投资。
{"title":"Erin’s Acres","authors":"Sinéad Moynihan","doi":"10.3828/liverpool/9781786941800.003.0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9781786941800.003.0004","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter considers the extent to which the Returned Yank surfaces in narratives treating of land acquisition, distribution, ownership and development in Ireland in the second half of the twentieth century. It identifies two overlapping motifs in Returned Yank narratives that have been stated, restated and reworked in various historically-contingent ways from at least the 1930s, through the Lemassian turn, through the Celtic Tiger years: first, the extent to which the Returned Yank who returns to Ireland to buy property symbolises widespread ambivalence concerning the role of the post-independence Land Commission in Irish life; second, the degree to which narratives of land-purchasing (or ‘land-grabbing’) Returned Yanks become abstracted in the 1960s and beyond to the extent that s/he (usually he) comes to symbolise U.S. investment in Ireland more generally.","PeriodicalId":369342,"journal":{"name":"Ireland, Migration and Return Migration","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124466144","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
‘Mother Macree ad nauseam’
Pub Date : 2019-05-01 DOI: 10.3828/liverpool/9781786941800.003.0003
Sinéad Moynihan
This chapter argues that narratives of female Returned Yanks emerge forcefully in Irish culture of the 1990s as a kind of imaginative counterpart to Irish citizens’ enforced confrontation with Ireland’s past at the same historical moment, particularly with respect to the collusion of Church and State in the oppression and, often, abuse of women and children. The protagonists of these texts – and I focus most attentively on works by Benjamin Black (John Banville) and Annie Murphy – literally return to Ireland, but they also visit, or revisit, upon Ireland some of the repressions of its past. They do so both thematically, by dramatising the issues of unmarried motherhood, forced adoption and Church intervention in the family; and formally, by revising previous and tenacious gendered mythologies of emigration and return.
本章认为,在20世纪90年代的爱尔兰文化中,女性美国佬的叙事作为一种想象的对应物,在同一历史时刻,爱尔兰公民与爱尔兰过去的强制对抗,特别是在教会和国家的勾结中,压迫和经常虐待妇女和儿童。这些文本的主人公——我最关注的是本杰明·布莱克(约翰·班维尔饰)和安妮·墨菲的作品——确实回到了爱尔兰,但他们也访问或重温了爱尔兰过去的一些压抑。他们在主题上做到了这一点,通过戏剧化的未婚母亲,强迫收养和教会干预家庭的问题;形式上,通过修正先前顽固的关于移民和回归的性别神话。
{"title":"‘Mother Macree ad nauseam’","authors":"Sinéad Moynihan","doi":"10.3828/liverpool/9781786941800.003.0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9781786941800.003.0003","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter argues that narratives of female Returned Yanks emerge forcefully in Irish culture of the 1990s as a kind of imaginative counterpart to Irish citizens’ enforced confrontation with Ireland’s past at the same historical moment, particularly with respect to the collusion of Church and State in the oppression and, often, abuse of women and children. The protagonists of these texts – and I focus most attentively on works by Benjamin Black (John Banville) and Annie Murphy – literally return to Ireland, but they also visit, or revisit, upon Ireland some of the repressions of its past. They do so both thematically, by dramatising the issues of unmarried motherhood, forced adoption and Church intervention in the family; and formally, by revising previous and tenacious gendered mythologies of emigration and return.","PeriodicalId":369342,"journal":{"name":"Ireland, Migration and Return Migration","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125553876","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
‘The Secret Dotted Line’ 《秘密虚线》
Pub Date : 2019-05-01 DOI: 10.3828/liverpool/9781786941800.003.0005
Sinéad Moynihan
This chapter explores the ways in which Irish writers have self-consciously invoked Irish-American return and/or the roots journey to address questions of literary genealogy. In other words, this chapter discusses narratives in which a thematic preoccupation with return also underwrites metafictional concerns with literary forebears, the Irish literary tradition and artistic exile. Exploring texts that span 1960 to 2008 and the work of prolific, exiled writers Brian Moore (1921-1999) and Edna O’Brien (b. 1930) as well as the much younger writer Denis Kehoe (b. 1978), this chapter configures ‘return’ in multiple senses: the literal returns of fictional characters to Ireland; return as ‘restoration’ (of occluded histories; of banned books); and return as an opportunity to engage with (literary) genealogies that do not conform to the gendered and heteronormative orthodoxies of the Irish literary tradition.
本章探讨了爱尔兰作家自觉地援引爱尔兰裔美国人的回归和/或根源之旅来解决文学谱系问题的方式。换句话说,这一章讨论的叙事中,对回归的主题关注也支持了对文学祖先、爱尔兰文学传统和艺术流亡的元虚构关注。本章探讨了1960年至2008年期间的文本,以及流亡作家布莱恩·摩尔(1921-1999)和埃德娜·奥布莱恩(生于1930年)以及更年轻的作家丹尼斯·基霍(生于1978年)的作品,本章从多个意义上配置了“回归”:小说人物的文字回归爱尔兰;作为“恢复”(被封锁的历史)的回归;禁书);并返回作为一个机会,参与(文学)家谱,不符合性别和异性恋正统的爱尔兰文学传统。
{"title":"‘The Secret Dotted Line’","authors":"Sinéad Moynihan","doi":"10.3828/liverpool/9781786941800.003.0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9781786941800.003.0005","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores the ways in which Irish writers have self-consciously invoked Irish-American return and/or the roots journey to address questions of literary genealogy. In other words, this chapter discusses narratives in which a thematic preoccupation with return also underwrites metafictional concerns with literary forebears, the Irish literary tradition and artistic exile. Exploring texts that span 1960 to 2008 and the work of prolific, exiled writers Brian Moore (1921-1999) and Edna O’Brien (b. 1930) as well as the much younger writer Denis Kehoe (b. 1978), this chapter configures ‘return’ in multiple senses: the literal returns of fictional characters to Ireland; return as ‘restoration’ (of occluded histories; of banned books); and return as an opportunity to engage with (literary) genealogies that do not conform to the gendered and heteronormative orthodoxies of the Irish literary tradition.","PeriodicalId":369342,"journal":{"name":"Ireland, Migration and Return Migration","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116422209","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
‘We Are Where We Are’ 《我们在哪里》
Pub Date : 2019-05-01 DOI: 10.3828/liverpool/9781786941800.003.0006
Sinéad Moynihan
Arguing that return emigration and the figure of the returnee have proven central to discourses of Irish economic recovery, the coda puts Colm Tóibín’s Brooklyn (2009) in conversation with Kate Kerrigan’s Ellis Island (2009), situating both historical novels emphatically within the moment of their composition rather than those periods during which they are set (1950s and 1920s). It contends that they must be read in the context of wider Irish discourses of self-analysis that accompanied the collapse of the Celtic Tiger economy, discourses which troubled the historical construction of the Irish/U.S. transatlantic relationship in oppositional terms by suggesting that boom-time Ireland had, in fact, become the U.S. Emphasising both novels’ interest in forms of feminine self-fashioning, labour and enterprise that are evocative of the ways in which the Celtic Tiger was, itself, constructed as feminine, the coda argues that the novels deploy the motifs of emigration and return in order to explore and, to varying degrees, critique the neoliberal economic model celebrated during the boom years.
作者认为归国移民和归国者的形象已被证明是爱尔兰经济复苏话语的核心,结束语将科尔姆Tóibín的《布鲁克林》(2009)与凯特·凯瑞根的《埃利斯岛》(2009)进行了对话,将这两部历史小说重点放在它们创作的那一刻,而不是它们设定的时期(1950年代和1920年代)。它认为,它们必须在更广泛的爱尔兰自我分析话语的背景下阅读,这些话语伴随着凯尔特之虎经济的崩溃,这些话语困扰了爱尔兰/美国的历史建构强调两部小说对女性自我塑造、劳动和企业的形式的兴趣,这些形式唤起了凯尔特之虎本身被构建为女性的方式,结尾处认为,两部小说部署了移民和回归的主题,以便探索并在不同程度上批评在繁荣时期受到赞扬的新自由主义经济模式。
{"title":"‘We Are Where We Are’","authors":"Sinéad Moynihan","doi":"10.3828/liverpool/9781786941800.003.0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9781786941800.003.0006","url":null,"abstract":"Arguing that return emigration and the figure of the returnee have proven central to discourses of Irish economic recovery, the coda puts Colm Tóibín’s Brooklyn (2009) in conversation with Kate Kerrigan’s Ellis Island (2009), situating both historical novels emphatically within the moment of their composition rather than those periods during which they are set (1950s and 1920s). It contends that they must be read in the context of wider Irish discourses of self-analysis that accompanied the collapse of the Celtic Tiger economy, discourses which troubled the historical construction of the Irish/U.S. transatlantic relationship in oppositional terms by suggesting that boom-time Ireland had, in fact, become the U.S. Emphasising both novels’ interest in forms of feminine self-fashioning, labour and enterprise that are evocative of the ways in which the Celtic Tiger was, itself, constructed as feminine, the coda argues that the novels deploy the motifs of emigration and return in order to explore and, to varying degrees, critique the neoliberal economic model celebrated during the boom years.","PeriodicalId":369342,"journal":{"name":"Ireland, Migration and Return Migration","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132924806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
‘The Meanest Form of Animal’? The Returned Yank in the Cultural Imagination “最卑鄙的动物”?文化想象中的回归美国佬
Pub Date : 2019-05-01 DOI: 10.3828/liverpool/9781786941800.003.0001
Sinéad Moynihan
The introduction maps out the key assertion of the book: that the Returned Yank surfaces repeatedly and most memorably when questions regarding ‘tradition’ and ‘modernity’ are particularly vexed. Emphasising the rhetorical significance of the figure of the returned migrant in debates about Irish economic recovery since 2008, the introduction surveys both the creative landscape inhabited by the Returned Yank since the late nineteenth century. Acknowledging that cultural representations of the figure long predate the stated parameters of the book (1952 to present), the introduction goes on to demonstrate to extent to which a series of socio-political, demographic, scholarly, cultural, business-oriented and touristic interests and efforts collided and intersected in Ireland of the 1950s, ensuring that the issues of migration and return – and, most especially, the figure of the Returned Yank – became imprinted on the public consciousness in ways not previously witnessed.
引言列出了这本书的关键主张:当“传统”和“现代”的问题特别令人烦恼时,《归来的美国佬》会反复出现,而且最令人难忘。自2008年以来,在关于爱尔兰经济复苏的辩论中,强调了回归移民形象的修辞意义,引言调查了自19世纪末以来回归的美国人居住的创造性景观。承认这个人物的文化表现早在书中所述的参数(1952年至今)之前,引言继续展示了一系列社会政治、人口、学术、文化、商业导向和旅游利益和努力在20世纪50年代的爱尔兰碰撞和交叉的程度,确保了移民和回归的问题,尤其是,“归来的美国佬”的形象以前所未有的方式深深地印在了公众的意识中。
{"title":"‘The Meanest Form of Animal’? The Returned Yank in the Cultural Imagination","authors":"Sinéad Moynihan","doi":"10.3828/liverpool/9781786941800.003.0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9781786941800.003.0001","url":null,"abstract":"The introduction maps out the key assertion of the book: that the Returned Yank surfaces repeatedly and most memorably when questions regarding ‘tradition’ and ‘modernity’ are particularly vexed. Emphasising the rhetorical significance of the figure of the returned migrant in debates about Irish economic recovery since 2008, the introduction surveys both the creative landscape inhabited by the Returned Yank since the late nineteenth century. Acknowledging that cultural representations of the figure long predate the stated parameters of the book (1952 to present), the introduction goes on to demonstrate to extent to which a series of socio-political, demographic, scholarly, cultural, business-oriented and touristic interests and efforts collided and intersected in Ireland of the 1950s, ensuring that the issues of migration and return – and, most especially, the figure of the Returned Yank – became imprinted on the public consciousness in ways not previously witnessed.","PeriodicalId":369342,"journal":{"name":"Ireland, Migration and Return Migration","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117324228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
List of Figures 数字一览表
Pub Date : 2019-03-08 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvhn0cw3.3
{"title":"List of Figures","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvhn0cw3.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvhn0cw3.3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":369342,"journal":{"name":"Ireland, Migration and Return Migration","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133437579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Introduction: 作品简介:
Pub Date : 2019-03-08 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvhn0cw3.5
{"title":"Introduction:","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvhn0cw3.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvhn0cw3.5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":369342,"journal":{"name":"Ireland, Migration and Return Migration","volume":"30 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123590828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Erin’s Acres: 艾琳’s英亩。
Pub Date : 2019-03-08 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvhn0cw3.8
{"title":"Erin’s Acres:","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvhn0cw3.8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvhn0cw3.8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":369342,"journal":{"name":"Ireland, Migration and Return Migration","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130495899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
‘The Secret Dotted Line’: “秘密虚线”:
Pub Date : 2019-03-08 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvhn0cw3.9
{"title":"‘The Secret Dotted Line’:","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvhn0cw3.9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvhn0cw3.9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":369342,"journal":{"name":"Ireland, Migration and Return Migration","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128280619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Ireland, Migration and Return Migration
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1