Pub Date : 2018-11-02eCollection Date: 2018-09-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1675163
Angelo De Carli, Edoardo Monaco, Daniele Mazza, Giuseppe Argento, Andrea Redler, Lorenzo Proietti, Edoardo Gaj, Andrea Ferretti
Purpose The purpose of this study was to describe the anatomy of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) of the knee by the use of 1.5 Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a series of young patients without knee injuries. Methods Subjects aged 18 years or older without an anterior cruciate ligament injury, as confirmed on MRI, were included. MRI examinations were all performed on 1.5 T scans. The ALL was defined as the low signal band originating from the region of the lateral epicondyle of the femur, crossing the proximal surface of the lateral collateral ligament, deep to the iliotibial band, and inserting onto the tibia between the Gerdy's tubercle and the fibular head. Results Twenty-six patients met the eligibility criteria and were enrolled into the study. In one patient, it was not possible to visualize the ALL. In all the other subjects, the ligament originated anterior and distal to the lateral epicondyle and inserted on the proximal tibia approximately 5 mm below the joint line and just distal to the Gerdy's tubercle. It had an average length of 33 ± 1.2 mm, an average width of 5.5 ± 0.3 mm, and an average thickness of 2 mm. Conclusion The ALL is a distinct structure of the anterolateral capsule that can be easily identified using 1.5 T MRI scans. Level of Evidence This is a level IV, observational study.
本研究的目的是利用1.5特斯拉(T)磁共振成像(MRI)描述一系列无膝关节损伤的年轻患者的膝关节前外侧韧带(ALL)的解剖结构。方法研究对象年龄在18岁及以上,经MRI证实无前交叉韧带损伤。MRI检查均在1.5 T扫描上进行。ALL被定义为起源于股骨外侧上髁区域的低信号带,穿过外侧副韧带近表面,深至髂胫束,并在Gerdy结节和腓骨头之间插入胫骨。结果26例患者符合入选标准,纳入研究。在一名患者中,无法看到ALL。在所有其他受试者中,韧带起源于外侧上髁的前部和远端,并插入胫骨近端,关节线以下约5毫米,正好在Gerdy结节的远端。平均长度33±1.2 mm,平均宽度5.5±0.3 mm,平均厚度2 mm。结论ALL是一种独特的前外侧囊结构,可通过1.5 T MRI扫描识别。这是一项IV级观察性研究。
{"title":"Assessment of the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee by Magnetic Resonance Imaging.","authors":"Angelo De Carli, Edoardo Monaco, Daniele Mazza, Giuseppe Argento, Andrea Redler, Lorenzo Proietti, Edoardo Gaj, Andrea Ferretti","doi":"10.1055/s-0038-1675163","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1675163","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b> The purpose of this study was to describe the anatomy of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) of the knee by the use of 1.5 Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a series of young patients without knee injuries. <b>Methods</b> Subjects aged 18 years or older without an anterior cruciate ligament injury, as confirmed on MRI, were included. MRI examinations were all performed on 1.5 T scans. The ALL was defined as the low signal band originating from the region of the lateral epicondyle of the femur, crossing the proximal surface of the lateral collateral ligament, deep to the iliotibial band, and inserting onto the tibia between the Gerdy's tubercle and the fibular head. <b>Results</b> Twenty-six patients met the eligibility criteria and were enrolled into the study. In one patient, it was not possible to visualize the ALL. In all the other subjects, the ligament originated anterior and distal to the lateral epicondyle and inserted on the proximal tibia approximately 5 mm below the joint line and just distal to the Gerdy's tubercle. It had an average length of 33 ± 1.2 mm, an average width of 5.5 ± 0.3 mm, and an average thickness of 2 mm. <b>Conclusion</b> The ALL is a distinct structure of the anterolateral capsule that can be easily identified using 1.5 T MRI scans. <b>Level of Evidence</b> This is a level IV, observational study.</p>","PeriodicalId":37852,"journal":{"name":"Joints","volume":"6 3","pages":"153-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0038-1675163","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36853773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-10-31eCollection Date: 2018-09-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1673701
Roberta Monesi, Maria Grazia Benedetti, Alessandro Zati, Daniela Vigna, Domenico Romanello, Alberto Monello, Roberto Rotini
Purpose There is still conflicting evidence to support postoperative rehabilitation protocols using immobilization following rotator cuff repair over early motion. The objective of the study was to evaluate the evolution of pain, shoulder function, and patients' perception of their health status up to 1 year after cuff rotator repair and a standard postoperative rehabilitation protocol consisting of 4 weeks of immobilization followed by a 2-week assisted controlled rehabilitation. Methods Descriptive, longitudinal, uncontrolled case-series study was performed on 49 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair following traumatic or degenerative lesions. VAS scale for pain, Constant-Murley score for function, and SF-12 score for quality of life were used as outcome measures and were administered before the rehabilitation treatment, at the end of the 2-week rehabilitation, 3 months, and 1 year after surgery. Results VAS pain score decreased significantly along the follow-up reaching almost a nil value after 1 year (0.2). Function as measured by Constant-Murley score had a significant improvement during follow-up, reaching a mean value of 84.6. The short form (SF)-12 score increased over time reaching 46.3 for the physical and 43.8 for the psychological dimension, respectively, at 1 year. Conclusion The present study confirmed an excellent outcome at 1 year after rotator cuff repair using a traditional 4-week immobilization followed by a 2-week rehabilitation protocol without evidence of tendon un-healing or re-tearing. Level of Evidence This is a level IV, therapeutic case series.
{"title":"The Effects of a Standard Postoperative Rehabilitation Protocol for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair on Pain, Function, and Health Perception.","authors":"Roberta Monesi, Maria Grazia Benedetti, Alessandro Zati, Daniela Vigna, Domenico Romanello, Alberto Monello, Roberto Rotini","doi":"10.1055/s-0038-1673701","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1673701","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b> There is still conflicting evidence to support postoperative rehabilitation protocols using immobilization following rotator cuff repair over early motion. The objective of the study was to evaluate the evolution of pain, shoulder function, and patients' perception of their health status up to 1 year after cuff rotator repair and a standard postoperative rehabilitation protocol consisting of 4 weeks of immobilization followed by a 2-week assisted controlled rehabilitation. <b>Methods</b> Descriptive, longitudinal, uncontrolled case-series study was performed on 49 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair following traumatic or degenerative lesions. VAS scale for pain, Constant-Murley score for function, and SF-12 score for quality of life were used as outcome measures and were administered before the rehabilitation treatment, at the end of the 2-week rehabilitation, 3 months, and 1 year after surgery. <b>Results</b> VAS pain score decreased significantly along the follow-up reaching almost a nil value after 1 year (0.2). Function as measured by Constant-Murley score had a significant improvement during follow-up, reaching a mean value of 84.6. The short form (SF)-12 score increased over time reaching 46.3 for the physical and 43.8 for the psychological dimension, respectively, at 1 year. <b>Conclusion</b> The present study confirmed an excellent outcome at 1 year after rotator cuff repair using a traditional 4-week immobilization followed by a 2-week rehabilitation protocol without evidence of tendon un-healing or re-tearing. <b>Level of Evidence</b> This is a level IV, therapeutic case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":37852,"journal":{"name":"Joints","volume":"6 3","pages":"145-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0038-1673701","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36853772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-10-31eCollection Date: 2018-09-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1675162
Leslie Naggar
Arthroscopic treatment of greater tuberosity (GT) fractures has been previously described. Arthroscopy allows identifying and addressing coexisting injuries, such as rotator cuff tears, labrum, or superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions, which are often present. Fracture comminution precludes the use of rigid fracture fixation with screws and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is performed instead. Recent articles have depicted the role of the balloon-shaped subacromial spacer in massive and irreparable rotator cuff tears. The purpose of this technical report is to outline another use of the spacer in patients with a GT fracture. The concept is to leverage the advantage of the compression effect of the subacromial spacer to prevent displacement of the GT fracture and allow early active shoulder rehabilitation, especially in comminuted or eggshell fractures when rigid fixation is not feasible.
{"title":"Surgical Management of Comminuted, Displaced Greater Tuberosity Fractures: A New Technique of Subacromial Spacer on Top of Double-Row Suture Anchor Fixation.","authors":"Leslie Naggar","doi":"10.1055/s-0038-1675162","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1675162","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Arthroscopic treatment of greater tuberosity (GT) fractures has been previously described. Arthroscopy allows identifying and addressing coexisting injuries, such as rotator cuff tears, labrum, or superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions, which are often present. Fracture comminution precludes the use of rigid fracture fixation with screws and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is performed instead. Recent articles have depicted the role of the balloon-shaped subacromial spacer in massive and irreparable rotator cuff tears. The purpose of this technical report is to outline another use of the spacer in patients with a GT fracture. The concept is to leverage the advantage of the compression effect of the subacromial spacer to prevent displacement of the GT fracture and allow early active shoulder rehabilitation, especially in comminuted or eggshell fractures when rigid fixation is not feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":37852,"journal":{"name":"Joints","volume":"6 3","pages":"211-214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0038-1675162","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36812111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-10-18eCollection Date: 2018-09-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1673404
Tommaso Bonanzinga, Piergiuseppe Tanzi, Maria Pia Neri, Francesco Iacono, Claudio Mazzola, Alberto Belluati, Andrea Colombelli, Stefano Zaffagnini, Maurilio Marcacci
Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare, in terms of blood loss and implant alignment, a new generation of smart extramedullary (EM) cutting guides with the conventional intramedullary (IM) guide for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The hypothesis was that the EM system would result in less blood loss and fewer days of hospitalization, while ensuring equal or higher accuracy in the alignment of the femoral implant. Methods Thirty-six patients were enrolled for the present study: 18 patients underwent TKA using the EM guide and for the other 18 patients the IM guide was used. Preoperative and postoperative X-rays were acquired. The preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin values were compared. Lastly, length of hospital stay was recorded. Results The hemoglobin difference was significantly lower in the EM group. The alignment of the prosthetic femoral implant in the two groups was comparable but all patients in the EM cohort had a final alignment within 3 degrees of range on the frontal view, while 22% of the patients in the IM cohort had a final alignment exceeding 3 degrees of range. The mean hospitalization duration showed no significant difference between groups, though EM group showed 1.6 days less compared with IM group. Conclusions The inertial-based EM guide system could be useful for decreasing blood loss compared with conventional guide. This device tended to have better results even in terms of accuracy, but this difference was not significant. Level of Evidence This is a level II, prospective cohort study.
{"title":"Evaluation of Blood Loss and Implant Alignment after Total Knee Arthroplasty with Inertial Based Extramedullary Femoral Cutting Guide.","authors":"Tommaso Bonanzinga, Piergiuseppe Tanzi, Maria Pia Neri, Francesco Iacono, Claudio Mazzola, Alberto Belluati, Andrea Colombelli, Stefano Zaffagnini, Maurilio Marcacci","doi":"10.1055/s-0038-1673404","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1673404","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b> The purpose of this study was to compare, in terms of blood loss and implant alignment, a new generation of smart extramedullary (EM) cutting guides with the conventional intramedullary (IM) guide for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The hypothesis was that the EM system would result in less blood loss and fewer days of hospitalization, while ensuring equal or higher accuracy in the alignment of the femoral implant. <b>Methods</b> Thirty-six patients were enrolled for the present study: 18 patients underwent TKA using the EM guide and for the other 18 patients the IM guide was used. Preoperative and postoperative X-rays were acquired. The preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin values were compared. Lastly, length of hospital stay was recorded. <b>Results</b> The hemoglobin difference was significantly lower in the EM group. The alignment of the prosthetic femoral implant in the two groups was comparable but all patients in the EM cohort had a final alignment within 3 degrees of range on the frontal view, while 22% of the patients in the IM cohort had a final alignment exceeding 3 degrees of range. The mean hospitalization duration showed no significant difference between groups, though EM group showed 1.6 days less compared with IM group. <b>Conclusions</b> The inertial-based EM guide system could be useful for decreasing blood loss compared with conventional guide. This device tended to have better results even in terms of accuracy, but this difference was not significant. <b>Level of Evidence</b> This is a level II, prospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":37852,"journal":{"name":"Joints","volume":"6 3","pages":"161-166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0038-1673404","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36853775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-10-18eCollection Date: 2018-09-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1673405
Jennifer I Etcheson, Chukwuweike U Gwam, Nicole E George, Naval Walia, Christophe Jerjian, Ga-Ram Han, Sana Virani, Seth J Miller, Ronald E Delanois
Purpose The purpose of the present study was to assess perception of pain and pain management in smokers versus nonsmokers who received a total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods Patients who underwent THA from 2010 to 2016 were propensity score matched 1:1 based on race, body mass index, age, and sex. This yielded 124 smokers and 124 nonsmokers. Pain intensity was quantified using area under the curve for visual analog scale pain scores. Opioid consumption was determined using a morphine milliequivalent (mEq) conversion algorithm. An independent samples t -test and Chi-square analysis was conducted to assess continuous and categorical variables respectively. Results Smokers experienced a nonsignificantly increased pain intensity (198.1 vs. 185.7; p = 0.063). Smokers demonstrated significantly higher opioid consumption in both immediate postoperative (65.9 vs. 59.3 mEq; p = 0.045) and 90 days postoperative periods (619.9 vs. 458.9 mEq; p = 0.029). Conclusion Our study demonstrated a nonsignificantly increased pain intensity, and (in both the immediate and 90 days postoperative periods) a significantly higher opioid consumption following THA in patients who smoke cigarettes. This may be due to a relatively small effect size, warranting the need for larger prospective studies. Nevertheless, arthroplasty surgeons should encourage preoperative smoking cessation and alternative nonopioid analgesics to smoking patients receiving THA. Level of Evidence This is a level III, retrospective cohort study.
本研究的目的是评估吸烟者与接受全髋关节置换术(THA)的非吸烟者的疼痛感知和疼痛管理。方法2010 - 2016年接受人工髋关节置换术的患者按种族、体重指数、年龄、性别进行倾向评分1:1匹配。结果得出124名吸烟者和124名不吸烟者。疼痛强度采用视觉模拟量表疼痛评分曲线下面积量化。使用吗啡毫当量(mEq)转换算法确定阿片类药物消费量。对连续变量和分类变量分别进行独立样本t检验和卡方分析。结果吸烟者的疼痛强度无显著增加(198.1 vs. 185.7;P = 0.063)。术后两组吸烟者的阿片类药物消耗量均显著增加(65.9 mEq vs. 59.3 mEq;p = 0.045)和术后90天(619.9 vs. 458.9 mEq;P = 0.029)。结论:我们的研究表明吸烟的患者THA术后疼痛强度无明显增加,并且(在术后即刻和术后90天)阿片类药物的消耗明显增加。这可能是由于相对较小的效应量,因此需要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究。然而,关节置换术医生应鼓励接受THA的吸烟患者术前戒烟并使用非阿片类镇痛药。证据水平这是一项III级回顾性队列研究。
{"title":"Opiate Pain Medication Consumption in Cigarette Smokers following Total Hip Arthroplasty.","authors":"Jennifer I Etcheson, Chukwuweike U Gwam, Nicole E George, Naval Walia, Christophe Jerjian, Ga-Ram Han, Sana Virani, Seth J Miller, Ronald E Delanois","doi":"10.1055/s-0038-1673405","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1673405","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b> The purpose of the present study was to assess perception of pain and pain management in smokers versus nonsmokers who received a total hip arthroplasty (THA). <b>Methods</b> Patients who underwent THA from 2010 to 2016 were propensity score matched 1:1 based on race, body mass index, age, and sex. This yielded 124 smokers and 124 nonsmokers. Pain intensity was quantified using area under the curve for visual analog scale pain scores. Opioid consumption was determined using a morphine milliequivalent (mEq) conversion algorithm. An independent samples <i>t</i> -test and Chi-square analysis was conducted to assess continuous and categorical variables respectively. <b>Results</b> Smokers experienced a nonsignificantly increased pain intensity (198.1 vs. 185.7; <i>p</i> = 0.063). Smokers demonstrated significantly higher opioid consumption in both immediate postoperative (65.9 vs. 59.3 mEq; <i>p</i> = 0.045) and 90 days postoperative periods (619.9 vs. 458.9 mEq; <i>p</i> = 0.029). <b>Conclusion</b> Our study demonstrated a nonsignificantly increased pain intensity, and (in both the immediate and 90 days postoperative periods) a significantly higher opioid consumption following THA in patients who smoke cigarettes. This may be due to a relatively small effect size, warranting the need for larger prospective studies. Nevertheless, arthroplasty surgeons should encourage preoperative smoking cessation and alternative nonopioid analgesics to smoking patients receiving THA. <b>Level of Evidence</b> This is a level III, retrospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":37852,"journal":{"name":"Joints","volume":"6 3","pages":"157-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0038-1673405","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36853774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-09-27eCollection Date: 2018-09-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1672157
Alberto Grassi, Christian Carulli, Matteo Innocenti, Massimiliano Mosca, Stefano Zaffagnini, Corrado Bait
The purpose of this study was to analyze national surveys of orthopaedic surgeons on anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction to determine their preferences related to the preferred graft, femoral tunnel positioning, fixation and tensioning methods, antibiotic and anti-thromboembolic prophylaxis, and use of tourniquet and drains. A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was performed. Inclusion criteria were surveys of ACL reconstruction trends and preferences published in the past 5 years (2011-2016), involving members of national societies of orthopaedics. Information regarding survey modalities, population surveyed, graft choice both in the general or in the athletic population, surgical technique, fixation, use of antibiotic, tourniquet, drains, and anti-thromboembolic prophylaxis was extracted. Eight national surveys were included from Europe (three), North or Latin America (three), and Asia (two). Overall, 7,420 questionnaires were sent, and 1,495 participants completed the survey (response rate ranging from 16 to 76.6%). All surveys reported the hamstring tendon (HT) autograft as the preferred graft, ranging from 45 to 89% of the surveyed population, followed by bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft (2-41%) and allograft (2-17%). Only two surveys focusing on graft choice in athletic population underlined how in high-demand sportive population the graft choices changes in favor of BPTB. Single-bundle reconstruction was the preferred surgical technique in the four surveys that investigated this issue. Five surveys were in favor of anteromedial (AM) portal and two in favor of trans-tibial technique. Suspension devices for femoral fixation were the preferred choice in all but one survey, while interference screws were the preferred method for tibial fixation. The two surveys that investigated graft tensioning were in favor of manual tensioning. The use of tourniquet, antibiotics, drains, and anti-thromboembolic prophylaxis were vaguely reported. A trend toward the preference of HT autograft was registered in all the surveys; however, sport participation has been highlighted as an important variable for increased use of BPTB. Single-bundle reconstruction with AM portal technique and suspension femoral fixation and screws fixation for the tibia seem the preferred solution. Other variables such as tensioning, antibiotic, anti-thromboembolic prophylaxis, tourniquet use, and drains were investigated scarcely among the surveys; therefore, no clear trends could be delineated. This is a Level V, systematic review of expert opinion study.
本研究的目的是分析全国骨科医生对前交叉韧带(ACL)重建的调查,以确定他们对首选移植物、股管定位、固定和张紧方法、抗生素和抗血栓栓塞预防、止血带和引流管的使用等方面的偏好。系统检索PubMed、Web of Science和Cochrane Library。纳入标准为过去5年(2011-2016年)发表的ACL重建趋势和偏好调查,涉及国家骨科学会成员。提取有关调查方式、调查人群、普通人群或运动人群移植物选择、手术技术、固定、抗生素使用、止血带、引流管和抗血栓栓塞预防的信息。其中包括来自欧洲(3个)、北美或拉丁美洲(3个)和亚洲(2个)的8项全国性调查。共发送问卷7420份,1495人完成调查(回复率为16% ~ 76.6%)。所有调查都报道了腘绳肌腱(HT)自体移植物是首选的移植物,占调查人群的45%至89%,其次是骨-髌骨肌腱-骨(BPTB)移植物(2-41%)和同种异体移植物(2-17%)。只有两项调查关注运动人群的移植物选择,强调在高需求的运动人群中移植物选择如何有利于BPTB。在调查该问题的四项调查中,单束重建是首选的手术技术。5项调查支持前内侧门静脉(AM), 2项支持经胫骨技术。除一项调查外,所有调查均首选悬浮装置用于股骨固定,而干涉螺钉是胫骨固定的首选方法。调查接枝张紧的两项调查都赞成手工张紧。关于止血带、抗生素、引流管和抗血栓栓塞预防的使用报道模糊。所有的调查都显示出对HT自体移植物的偏好趋势;然而,体育参与已被强调为BPTB使用增加的一个重要变量。单束重建与AM门静脉技术和股骨悬挂固定和胫骨螺钉固定似乎是首选的解决方案。其他变量,如张力、抗生素、抗血栓栓塞预防、止血带的使用和引流管在调查中很少被调查;因此,无法描绘出明确的趋势。这是一项V级,系统评价专家意见的研究。
{"title":"New Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of National Surveys of the Last 5 Years.","authors":"Alberto Grassi, Christian Carulli, Matteo Innocenti, Massimiliano Mosca, Stefano Zaffagnini, Corrado Bait","doi":"10.1055/s-0038-1672157","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1672157","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to analyze national surveys of orthopaedic surgeons on anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction to determine their preferences related to the preferred graft, femoral tunnel positioning, fixation and tensioning methods, antibiotic and anti-thromboembolic prophylaxis, and use of tourniquet and drains. A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was performed. Inclusion criteria were surveys of ACL reconstruction trends and preferences published in the past 5 years (2011-2016), involving members of national societies of orthopaedics. Information regarding survey modalities, population surveyed, graft choice both in the general or in the athletic population, surgical technique, fixation, use of antibiotic, tourniquet, drains, and anti-thromboembolic prophylaxis was extracted. Eight national surveys were included from Europe (three), North or Latin America (three), and Asia (two). Overall, 7,420 questionnaires were sent, and 1,495 participants completed the survey (response rate ranging from 16 to 76.6%). All surveys reported the hamstring tendon (HT) autograft as the preferred graft, ranging from 45 to 89% of the surveyed population, followed by bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft (2-41%) and allograft (2-17%). Only two surveys focusing on graft choice in athletic population underlined how in high-demand sportive population the graft choices changes in favor of BPTB. Single-bundle reconstruction was the preferred surgical technique in the four surveys that investigated this issue. Five surveys were in favor of anteromedial (AM) portal and two in favor of trans-tibial technique. Suspension devices for femoral fixation were the preferred choice in all but one survey, while interference screws were the preferred method for tibial fixation. The two surveys that investigated graft tensioning were in favor of manual tensioning. The use of tourniquet, antibiotics, drains, and anti-thromboembolic prophylaxis were vaguely reported. A trend toward the preference of HT autograft was registered in all the surveys; however, sport participation has been highlighted as an important variable for increased use of BPTB. Single-bundle reconstruction with AM portal technique and suspension femoral fixation and screws fixation for the tibia seem the preferred solution. Other variables such as tensioning, antibiotic, anti-thromboembolic prophylaxis, tourniquet use, and drains were investigated scarcely among the surveys; therefore, no clear trends could be delineated. This is a Level V, systematic review of expert opinion study.</p>","PeriodicalId":37852,"journal":{"name":"Joints","volume":"6 3","pages":"177-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0038-1672157","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36853778","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Two clinical studies published in this issue of Joints deal with the complex issueofpatellofemoral pain treatment. Enea et al1 report the results obtained using distalization and medialization of the tibial tuberosity, a surgical treatment for potential patellar instability (PPI) associated with a particularly “challenging” predisposing factor, namely, the patella alta. The index group (PPI group), consisting of patients with pain but no episodes of frank patellar instability, was compared with a group of patients reporting pain and objective patellar instability. The authors found that the treatment significantly reduced pain and improved knee function in both groups. However, the improvement in subjective instability was significantly more marked in the patients with PPI. In short, the proposed treatment was found to be particularly effective in the treatment of patients with PPI and patellofemoral pain. The article by Uboldi et al,2 concerns a prospective randomized trial on the efficacy of an elastomeric knee brace used in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) in adjunct to a specifically developed rehabilitation program. Function was found to be significantly improved both in the study group and in the controls (who only received rehabilitation); however, use of the knee brace was associated with significantly reduced pain. Patellofemoral pain is, undoubtedly, a clinical problem with a high social and economic impact, given that it affects a young and active section of the population. Indeed, in addition to rehabilitation treatment costs, it is also necessary to consider the costs related to reduced productivity, due to days off work, and reduced work efficiency. Undoubtedly, surgery, when indicated, is effective in resolving symptoms. However, in most cases, the pain in PFPS is disabling, and surgical treatment, however adequately it corrects the factors underlying the clinical presentation, is rather invasive and not always predictable in terms of late sequelae. There have been few rigorous analyses of exercise therapy for the treatment of PFPS. A Cochrane review3 has highlighted the effectiveness of rehabilitation treatment in helping to reduce knee pain and function in patients with PFPS. Tan et al4 showed that annual direct medical costs are higher in patients receiving rehabilitation treatment compared with those not receiving treatment, although the latter generate higher social costs, in particular, deriving from loss of productivity and work efficiency. Overall, therefore, rehabilitation treatment of PFPS has a favorable cost-effectiveness ratio. But what arewe treating whenwe treat PFPS? A symptom or a disease? I certainly have no intention of wading into the complex debate regarding the nomenclature and classification of all those clinical situations in which patellofemoral pain, or anterior knee pain as it may more generally be defined, can be recognized as a component. However, it is certainly true that patellofem
{"title":"Patellofemoral Pain: Symptom or Disease?","authors":"Giuseppe Milano","doi":"10.1055/s-0038-1667195","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0038-1667195","url":null,"abstract":"Two clinical studies published in this issue of Joints deal with the complex issueofpatellofemoral pain treatment. Enea et al1 report the results obtained using distalization and medialization of the tibial tuberosity, a surgical treatment for potential patellar instability (PPI) associated with a particularly “challenging” predisposing factor, namely, the patella alta. The index group (PPI group), consisting of patients with pain but no episodes of frank patellar instability, was compared with a group of patients reporting pain and objective patellar instability. The authors found that the treatment significantly reduced pain and improved knee function in both groups. However, the improvement in subjective instability was significantly more marked in the patients with PPI. In short, the proposed treatment was found to be particularly effective in the treatment of patients with PPI and patellofemoral pain. The article by Uboldi et al,2 concerns a prospective randomized trial on the efficacy of an elastomeric knee brace used in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) in adjunct to a specifically developed rehabilitation program. Function was found to be significantly improved both in the study group and in the controls (who only received rehabilitation); however, use of the knee brace was associated with significantly reduced pain. Patellofemoral pain is, undoubtedly, a clinical problem with a high social and economic impact, given that it affects a young and active section of the population. Indeed, in addition to rehabilitation treatment costs, it is also necessary to consider the costs related to reduced productivity, due to days off work, and reduced work efficiency. Undoubtedly, surgery, when indicated, is effective in resolving symptoms. However, in most cases, the pain in PFPS is disabling, and surgical treatment, however adequately it corrects the factors underlying the clinical presentation, is rather invasive and not always predictable in terms of late sequelae. There have been few rigorous analyses of exercise therapy for the treatment of PFPS. A Cochrane review3 has highlighted the effectiveness of rehabilitation treatment in helping to reduce knee pain and function in patients with PFPS. Tan et al4 showed that annual direct medical costs are higher in patients receiving rehabilitation treatment compared with those not receiving treatment, although the latter generate higher social costs, in particular, deriving from loss of productivity and work efficiency. Overall, therefore, rehabilitation treatment of PFPS has a favorable cost-effectiveness ratio. But what arewe treating whenwe treat PFPS? A symptom or a disease? I certainly have no intention of wading into the complex debate regarding the nomenclature and classification of all those clinical situations in which patellofemoral pain, or anterior knee pain as it may more generally be defined, can be recognized as a component. However, it is certainly true that patellofem","PeriodicalId":37852,"journal":{"name":"Joints","volume":"6 2","pages":"73-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0038-1667195","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36348581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-06-22eCollection Date: 2018-06-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1661339
Francesco Mattia Uboldi, Paolo Ferrua, Daniele Tradati, Pietro Zedde, Jim Richards, Andrea Manunta, Massimo Berruto
Purpose This article verifies the effectiveness of a new brace on patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) in adjunct to a specifically developed rehabilitation program. Methods Two groups of 30 patients with PFPS were prospectively and randomly allocated to a rehabilitation protocol, with (group A) or without (group B) the use of a specific brace. All the patients were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months using the disease-specific Kujala scale and a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain; time to return to sport and patient satisfaction with the brace were also recorded. Results Kujala scale's values showed constant and progressive improvement. The mean score at 6 months was 79.8 ± 6.8 points in group A and 76.8 ± 8.6 in group B, rising at 12 months to 80.9 ± 7.5 in group A and 78.4 ± 8.3 in group B. VAS scores significantly differed ( p < 0.05) between the two groups at both 6 and 12 months; the score recorded at 12 months was 0.9 ± 1.3 in the brace-treated group and 1.8 ± 1.6 in the controls. The patients who used a brace showed a quicker return to sports and 75% of the patients in this group were satisfied. Conclusion All the scores improved progressively in both groups. The most significant improvement concerned pain, showing that the brace used in this study may allow a better subjective outcome and a quicker return to sport. Level of Evidence Level II, prospective randomized controlled trial.
{"title":"Use of an Elastomeric Knee Brace in Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome: Short-Term Results.","authors":"Francesco Mattia Uboldi, Paolo Ferrua, Daniele Tradati, Pietro Zedde, Jim Richards, Andrea Manunta, Massimo Berruto","doi":"10.1055/s-0038-1661339","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1661339","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b> This article verifies the effectiveness of a new brace on patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) in adjunct to a specifically developed rehabilitation program. <b>Methods</b> Two groups of 30 patients with PFPS were prospectively and randomly allocated to a rehabilitation protocol, with (group A) or without (group B) the use of a specific brace. All the patients were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months using the disease-specific Kujala scale and a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain; time to return to sport and patient satisfaction with the brace were also recorded. <b>Results</b> Kujala scale's values showed constant and progressive improvement. The mean score at 6 months was 79.8 ± 6.8 points in group A and 76.8 ± 8.6 in group B, rising at 12 months to 80.9 ± 7.5 in group A and 78.4 ± 8.3 in group B. VAS scores significantly differed ( <i>p</i> < 0.05) between the two groups at both 6 and 12 months; the score recorded at 12 months was 0.9 ± 1.3 in the brace-treated group and 1.8 ± 1.6 in the controls. The patients who used a brace showed a quicker return to sports and 75% of the patients in this group were satisfied. <b>Conclusion</b> All the scores improved progressively in both groups. The most significant improvement concerned pain, showing that the brace used in this study may allow a better subjective outcome and a quicker return to sport. <b>Level of Evidence</b> Level II, prospective randomized controlled trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":37852,"journal":{"name":"Joints","volume":"6 2","pages":"85-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0038-1661339","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36347437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-06-22eCollection Date: 2018-06-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1661340
Davide Enea, Pier Paolo Canè, Marco Fravisini, Antonio Gigante, Luca Dei Giudici
Purpose The aim of the study was to test the distalization and medialization of the tibial tuberosity (DMTT) for the treatment of patellar instability associated with patella alta, focusing on residual instability and pain. Methods Twenty-four consecutive patients (26 knees) suffering from patellofemoral instability and patella alta were treated by DMTT. Two groups were identified, which differed for documented history of frank patella dislocation. The groups were named objective patellar instability (OPI) (history of dislocation) and potential patella instability (PPI) (no dislocation). Outcome was measured with visual analogue scale (VAS), Kujala score, and Tegner score. Comparison between groups was performed using Student's t -test, Wilcoxon rank score, and Fisher's exact test (significance at p < 0.05). Results At 50 ± 18 and 41 ± 18 months of follow-up, respectively, both PPI and OPI groups obtained a significant pain reduction and functional improvement. The PPI group showed a significant decrease of the subjective instability. No procedure-related complications were reported. Conclusion This study suggests that DMTT is a viable option for PPI patients with patella alta. The outcome was comparable between PPI and OPI cases; however, decrease in subjective instability was significantly greater in PPI patients. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative study.
{"title":"Distalization and Medialization of Tibial Tuberosity for the Treatment of Potential Patellar Instability with Patella Alta.","authors":"Davide Enea, Pier Paolo Canè, Marco Fravisini, Antonio Gigante, Luca Dei Giudici","doi":"10.1055/s-0038-1661340","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1661340","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b> The aim of the study was to test the distalization and medialization of the tibial tuberosity (DMTT) for the treatment of patellar instability associated with patella alta, focusing on residual instability and pain. <b>Methods</b> Twenty-four consecutive patients (26 knees) suffering from patellofemoral instability and patella alta were treated by DMTT. Two groups were identified, which differed for documented history of frank patella dislocation. The groups were named objective patellar instability (OPI) (history of dislocation) and potential patella instability (PPI) (no dislocation). Outcome was measured with visual analogue scale (VAS), Kujala score, and Tegner score. Comparison between groups was performed using Student's <i>t</i> -test, Wilcoxon rank score, and Fisher's exact test (significance at <i>p</i> < 0.05). <b>Results</b> At 50 ± 18 and 41 ± 18 months of follow-up, respectively, both PPI and OPI groups obtained a significant pain reduction and functional improvement. The PPI group showed a significant decrease of the subjective instability. No procedure-related complications were reported. <b>Conclusion</b> This study suggests that DMTT is a viable option for PPI patients with patella alta. The outcome was comparable between PPI and OPI cases; however, decrease in subjective instability was significantly greater in PPI patients. <b>Level of Evidence</b> Level III, retrospective comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":37852,"journal":{"name":"Joints","volume":"6 2","pages":"80-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0038-1661340","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36347436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-06-22eCollection Date: 2018-06-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1661338
Stefano Biggi, Stefano Divano, Riccardo Tedino, Andrea Capuzzo, Stefano Tornago, Andrea Camera
Purpose Difficult primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and revision TKA may be high demanding, especially during joint exposure. Aim of this article is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of a series of patients, who underwent TKA and revision TKA, where tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) was performed. Methods We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of 79 consecutives TKAs where TTO was performed. Patients were assessed clinically and radiographically at their last follow-up (mean, 7.4 ± 3.7 years). Clinical evaluation included the Knee Society Score (KSS), the pain visual analogue scale (VAS), and range of motion. Radiological assessment included the evaluation of radiolucent lines, osteolysis, cortical bone hypertrophy, time of bone healing of the TTO fragment, and the hardware complication. Results KSS raised from 40.7 ± 3.1 to 75 ± 4.3 ( p < 0.0001). Knee flexion increased from 78.7 ± 9.9° to 95.0 ± 9.5° ( p < 0.0001), and VAS improved from 7.9 ± 0.9 to 3.8 ± 1 ( p < 0.0001). No signs of loosening or evolutive radiolucency lines were found. Osteolytic areas around the stem were detected. No significant association was found between the implant design and the outcomes, while aseptic loosening showed significantly better results. Complications were: 4 painful hardware, 3 late periprosthetic infections, 1 extension lag of 5°, and 3 flexion lag. Conclusion Our experience suggests the use of TTO to improve the surgical approach in difficult primary TKA or revision TKA. A precise surgical technique leads to good results with low risk of complications. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic case series.
{"title":"Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Midterm Results Experience of a Monocentric Study.","authors":"Stefano Biggi, Stefano Divano, Riccardo Tedino, Andrea Capuzzo, Stefano Tornago, Andrea Camera","doi":"10.1055/s-0038-1661338","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1661338","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b> Difficult primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and revision TKA may be high demanding, especially during joint exposure. Aim of this article is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of a series of patients, who underwent TKA and revision TKA, where tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) was performed. <b>Methods</b> We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of 79 consecutives TKAs where TTO was performed. Patients were assessed clinically and radiographically at their last follow-up (mean, 7.4 ± 3.7 years). Clinical evaluation included the Knee Society Score (KSS), the pain visual analogue scale (VAS), and range of motion. Radiological assessment included the evaluation of radiolucent lines, osteolysis, cortical bone hypertrophy, time of bone healing of the TTO fragment, and the hardware complication. <b>Results</b> KSS raised from 40.7 ± 3.1 to 75 ± 4.3 ( <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Knee flexion increased from 78.7 ± 9.9° to 95.0 ± 9.5° ( <i>p</i> < 0.0001), and VAS improved from 7.9 ± 0.9 to 3.8 ± 1 ( <i>p</i> < 0.0001). No signs of loosening or evolutive radiolucency lines were found. Osteolytic areas around the stem were detected. No significant association was found between the implant design and the outcomes, while aseptic loosening showed significantly better results. Complications were: 4 painful hardware, 3 late periprosthetic infections, 1 extension lag of 5°, and 3 flexion lag. <b>Conclusion</b> Our experience suggests the use of TTO to improve the surgical approach in difficult primary TKA or revision TKA. A precise surgical technique leads to good results with low risk of complications. <b>Level of Evidence</b> Level IV, therapeutic case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":37852,"journal":{"name":"Joints","volume":"6 2","pages":"95-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0038-1661338","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36347439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}