Journal of graduate medical education最新文献

Background Despite global awareness of the impacts of climate change on human health, assessment of resident physicians' confidence in environmental health is limited. Lack of confidence in explaining environmental health topics can affect both patient education and advocacy efforts. Objective To determine how confident resident physicians are in their environmental health training and their ability to explain climate health topics. Methods An online survey was distributed to internal medicine residents at a large university-affiliated program in 2023. Self-perceived confidence levels in explaining various environmental health topics to a peer were measured using a Likert scale (from 1=not confident at all, to 5=completely confident) and a subsequent rank-order analysis of the response means. Results The response rate was 56% (62 out of 110 residents). A mean confidence score of 2.22 was reported on all topics, with hazardous waste (m=1.73), endocrine disruptors (m=1.76), water quality (m=1.9), toxicology (m=2.02), and environmental justice (m=2.04) representing lowest scores. Highest mean scores were reported in food security (m=2.71) and emerging infectious disease (m=2.92). Twenty-seven of 62 (44%) residents reported no confidence at all in their ability to discuss environmental justice concepts, with 17 of 62 (27%) reporting slight confidence in doing so. Conclusions Physician trainees report low confidence levels regarding their ability to explain multiple environmental topics to their peers. Forty-four of 62 (71%) residents report either no or slight confidence in their ability to explain environmental justice to a colleague.

Background Although Clinical Competency Committees (CCCs) were implemented to facilitate the goals of competency-based medical education, implementation has been variable, and we do not know if and how these committees affected programs and assessment in graduate medical education (GME). Objective To explore the roles CCCs fulfill in GME and their effect on trainees, faculty, and programs. Methods We conducted a narrative review of CCC primary research with the following inclusion criteria: all articles must be research in nature, focused on GME and specifically studying CCCs, and published in English language journals from January 2013 to November 2022. Results The main results are as follows: (1) The primary role of the CCC (decision-making on trainee progress) is mostly described in "snapshots" (ie, focusing on a single aspect of this role at a single point in time); (2) CCCs are taking on secondary roles, some of which were anticipated (eg, remediation, feedback) whereas others were "unanticipated" (eg, use of CCC data to validate trainee self-assessment, predict trainee performance in other settings such as certifying examinations, investigate gender bias in assessment); and (3) Articles briefly mentioned short-term outcomes of CCCs at the level of the trainees, faculty, and programs. However, most studies described interventions to aid CCC work and did not specifically aim at investigating short-term (eg, curriculum changes) or long-term outcomes (eg, improved patient outcomes). Conclusions CCCs fulfill a range of roles in assessment beyond their intended purpose. A more systematic approach is needed to investigate the outcomes of CCC implementation on GME.

Background Climate change threatens humanity's health and well-being. While climate change topics have been increasingly incorporated into undergraduate medical education, it is unclear to what extent they have been incorporated into graduate medical education (GME) curricula in the United States. Objective To examine how climate change has been incorporated into GME curricula in the United States. Methods We conducted a scoping review of published literature from January 2013 through November 2023. PubMed and Scopus were searched, with articles assessed by 3 reviewers in a blinded fashion. Resources were included if they described how climate change is incorporated into GME curricula in the United States, and if they discussed topics such as disaster medicine, mass casualty events, environmental medicine, public health, health policy, wilderness medicine, quality improvement, and sustainability. Articles were analyzed using descriptive numerical analysis and qualitative assessment to identify article characteristics and themes. Results The inclusion criteria generated 17 articles that examined climate change incorporation into GME curricula and curriculum interventions covering topics used for inclusion. The most common type of article (5 of 17, 29%) employed surveys of program directors on the inclusion of climate-related topics. Conclusions Published accounts of climate-related topics in US GME program curricula are few. More content is found in topics related to emergency medicine. Curricula frameworks have been proposed for pediatric and internal medicine residency programs, but we know little about their efficacy. Future scholarship should fill these gaps to educate learners to improve health care sustainability and resiliency.