In historical writing about Ireland in the years following the Glorious Revolution little attention has been paid to the idea of ‘plantation’. The governing assumption has been that any schemes to introduce substantial numbers of Protestant settlers were outmoded and unrealistic. This article takes another look at the extent to which, after 1691, elements in the Protestant propertied elite promoted plantation schemes and suggests that the idea was not only central to the plans for reconstruction envisaged by particular groups, especially in the province of Munster, but played a part in moulding a political outlook and creating a distinctively Whig political interest both in the Irish parliament and in the localities. The article goes on to propose that a set of developments in the middle years of the 1690s reduced interest in plantation, so that, by the early 1700s, the political energies of the ‘Protestant ascendancy’ were instead focused on legislation to restrict the property rights and political influence of what had come to be regarded as an entrenched Catholic majority in the population at large.
{"title":"Plantation and politics in Williamite Ireland","authors":"D. Hayton","doi":"10.3828/sh.2022.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3828/sh.2022.2","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000In historical writing about Ireland in the years following the Glorious Revolution little attention has been paid to the idea of ‘plantation’. The governing assumption has been that any schemes to introduce substantial numbers of Protestant settlers were outmoded and unrealistic. This article takes another look at the extent to which, after 1691, elements in the Protestant propertied elite promoted plantation schemes and suggests that the idea was not only central to the plans for reconstruction envisaged by particular groups, especially in the province of Munster, but played a part in moulding a political outlook and creating a distinctively Whig political interest both in the Irish parliament and in the localities. The article goes on to propose that a set of developments in the middle years of the 1690s reduced interest in plantation, so that, by the early 1700s, the political energies of the ‘Protestant ascendancy’ were instead focused on legislation to restrict the property rights and political influence of what had come to be regarded as an entrenched Catholic majority in the population at large.","PeriodicalId":383312,"journal":{"name":"Studia Hibernica: Volume 48, Issue 1","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115047315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
At the beginning of the twentieth century, as the Irish language revival movement gathered pace, Conradh na Gaeilge encouraged those who were keen to promote the language to use the Irish version of their names as much as possible, including painting their name and address in Irish on carts, and a number of prosecutions were taken under the Summary Jurisdiction (Ireland) Act 1851. Most famously, Patrick Pearse represented Niall Mac Giolla Bhrighde in 1905 in a case stated to the court of King’s Bench. Pearse went on to represent Domhnall Ua Buachalla in a similar but less well-known case the following year. Drawing on files from the Chief Secretary’s Office in Dublin Castle and digitised contemporaneous newspaper reports, this article provides an overview of the names in Irish on carts cases, which began in 1893, peaked in 1905 and died off after 1906, and finds that, post-partition, there were at least three similar prosecutions in Northern Ireland.
20世纪初，随着爱尔兰语复兴运动的步伐加快，康拉德·纳·盖尔吉鼓励那些热衷于推广该语言的人尽可能使用爱尔兰语的名字，包括在马车上用爱尔兰语画他们的名字和地址，根据1851年的简易管辖权(爱尔兰)法案，许多人被起诉。最著名的是，帕特里克·皮尔斯于1905年代表尼尔·麦克·吉拉·布里格德在国王法庭上陈述的一个案件。第二年，皮尔斯代表Domhnall Ua Buachalla处理了一起类似但知名度较低的案件。根据都柏林城堡首席秘书办公室的文件和当时的数字化报纸报道，本文概述了爱尔兰马车案件中的名字，这些案件始于1893年，在1905年达到顶峰，在1906年之后消失，并发现，在分治后，北爱尔兰至少有三起类似的起诉。
{"title":"A trifling matter? Names in Irish on carts: the Dublin Castle files","authors":"Marilyn E. Phelan","doi":"10.3828/sh.2022.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3828/sh.2022.5","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000At the beginning of the twentieth century, as the Irish language revival movement gathered pace, Conradh na Gaeilge encouraged those who were keen to promote the language to use the Irish version of their names as much as possible, including painting their name and address in Irish on carts, and a number of prosecutions were taken under the Summary Jurisdiction (Ireland) Act 1851. Most famously, Patrick Pearse represented Niall Mac Giolla Bhrighde in 1905 in a case stated to the court of King’s Bench. Pearse went on to represent Domhnall Ua Buachalla in a similar but less well-known case the following year. Drawing on files from the Chief Secretary’s Office in Dublin Castle and digitised contemporaneous newspaper reports, this article provides an overview of the names in Irish on carts cases, which began in 1893, peaked in 1905 and died off after 1906, and finds that, post-partition, there were at least three similar prosecutions in Northern Ireland.","PeriodicalId":383312,"journal":{"name":"Studia Hibernica: Volume 48, Issue 1","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115026395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sparky Booker, Trevor Herbert, Mícheál Hoyne, James Kelly, Mícheál Mac Craith ofm, Jennifer Keating, Bobbie Nolan, Ida Milne, Darragh Gannon, Radvan Markus, Brian M. Hanley, Eric G. E. Zuelow
{"title":"Léirmheasanna/Reviews","authors":"Sparky Booker, Trevor Herbert, Mícheál Hoyne, James Kelly, Mícheál Mac Craith ofm, Jennifer Keating, Bobbie Nolan, Ida Milne, Darragh Gannon, Radvan Markus, Brian M. Hanley, Eric G. E. Zuelow","doi":"10.3828/sh.2022.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3828/sh.2022.7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":383312,"journal":{"name":"Studia Hibernica: Volume 48, Issue 1","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123261755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article surveys the references to magi (the Latin term that is used to render Irish druid) in Tírechán’s account of the career of Saint Patrick. Patrick is described by Tírechán as encountering magi relatively frequently: on a few occasions they oppose him, and are destroyed, but these cases seem to be exceptional. Patrick’s master during his time as a slave is said to have been a magus, whose children were Patrick’s first converts; other magi as well are described as accepting the new religion and entering the priesthood, and one of these magi-turned-priests establishes an ecclesiastical lineage that continues into later generations. Tírechán uses some Irish words that he claims derive from the magi, and the article considers his use of pagan terminology more generally. It is suggested that he may have derived his knowledge of the magi from a person or persons descended from them.
{"title":"Tírechán and the magi","authors":"J. Carey","doi":"10.3828/sh.2022.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3828/sh.2022.1","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000This article surveys the references to magi (the Latin term that is used to render Irish druid) in Tírechán’s account of the career of Saint Patrick. Patrick is described by Tírechán as encountering magi relatively frequently: on a few occasions they oppose him, and are destroyed, but these cases seem to be exceptional. Patrick’s master during his time as a slave is said to have been a magus, whose children were Patrick’s first converts; other magi as well are described as accepting the new religion and entering the priesthood, and one of these magi-turned-priests establishes an ecclesiastical lineage that continues into later generations. Tírechán uses some Irish words that he claims derive from the magi, and the article considers his use of pagan terminology more generally. It is suggested that he may have derived his knowledge of the magi from a person or persons descended from them.","PeriodicalId":383312,"journal":{"name":"Studia Hibernica: Volume 48, Issue 1","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117262095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The mid-nineteenth century was a challenging and turbulent time for Irish theatres, with the 1840s being particularly difficult. The period saw a growing demand for recreation which resulted in a surge of improvements in Irish theatre infrastructure and concerted efforts of theatre managers to attract the public by providing a wide range of entertainment in cities and country towns. Irish audiences had access to a broad repertoire that embraced everything from Shakespeare and high opera to rude farce and low comedy, while developments in transport ensured that internationally renowned performers were familiar to Irish theatre-goers to whom the theatre became increasingly accessible.
{"title":"Theatre in Ireland in the mid-nineteenth century: the troubled 1840s","authors":"Karina Holton","doi":"10.3828/sh.2022.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3828/sh.2022.4","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000The mid-nineteenth century was a challenging and turbulent time for Irish theatres, with the 1840s being particularly difficult. The period saw a growing demand for recreation which resulted in a surge of improvements in Irish theatre infrastructure and concerted efforts of theatre managers to attract the public by providing a wide range of entertainment in cities and country towns. Irish audiences had access to a broad repertoire that embraced everything from Shakespeare and high opera to rude farce and low comedy, while developments in transport ensured that internationally renowned performers were familiar to Irish theatre-goers to whom the theatre became increasingly accessible.","PeriodicalId":383312,"journal":{"name":"Studia Hibernica: Volume 48, Issue 1","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115768032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article argues that the journal Irisleabhar Hibernia, later renamed as Iris Hibernia, offered a vision of Irish Europeanism that was wholly different from contemporary, EU-led understandings. The journal was published between 1937 and 1965 from the Université de Fribourg in Switzerland, an institution that makes for an enlightening comparison with the Irish post-secondary sector of the same period, especially St Patrick’s College, Maynooth. Throughout its existence, the journal was published by the Hibernia society, which was made up of Irish seminary students at Fribourg. But its interests were broadly interdisciplinary, becoming gradually more so from the 1950s into the 1960s. The journal’s perspective could be generally understood as conservative, communitarian and culture-led. This perspective is not necessarily a matter of simple left-right alignment, however, and the article synthesises the journal’s legacy by elucidating the difference between two Francophone Swiss writers who were important to group behind the journal: Denis de Rougemont and Gonzague de Reynold.
本文认为，后来更名为Iris Hibernia的Irisleabhar Hibernia杂志提供了一种完全不同于当代欧盟主导的理解的爱尔兰欧洲主义的愿景。该杂志于1937年至1965年间由瑞士弗里堡大学出版，该机构与同一时期的爱尔兰高等教育部门，特别是梅努斯的圣帕特里克学院进行了具有启发性的比较。在其存在的整个过程中，该杂志是由弗里堡的爱尔兰神学院学生组成的Hibernia协会出版的。但它的兴趣是广泛的跨学科，从20世纪50年代到60年代逐渐变得如此。该杂志的观点通常可以被理解为保守、社群主义和文化主导。然而，这种观点并不一定是一个简单的左右对齐问题，文章通过阐明两位法语瑞士作家(Denis de Rougemont和Gonzague de Reynold)之间的差异，综合了该杂志的遗产，这两位作家对该杂志的背后组织起了重要作用。
{"title":"‘Pro Fide et Patria’, but for Europe: Iris Hibernia and a Swiss-led vision for European Ireland","authors":"J. White","doi":"10.3828/sh.2022.6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3828/sh.2022.6","url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that the journal Irisleabhar Hibernia, later renamed as Iris Hibernia, offered a vision of Irish Europeanism that was wholly different from contemporary, EU-led understandings. The journal was published between 1937 and 1965 from the Université de Fribourg in Switzerland, an institution that makes for an enlightening comparison with the Irish post-secondary sector of the same period, especially St Patrick’s College, Maynooth. Throughout its existence, the journal was published by the Hibernia society, which was made up of Irish seminary students at Fribourg. But its interests were broadly interdisciplinary, becoming gradually more so from the 1950s into the 1960s. The journal’s perspective could be generally understood as conservative, communitarian and culture-led. This perspective is not necessarily a matter of simple left-right alignment, however, and the article synthesises the journal’s legacy by elucidating the difference between two Francophone Swiss writers who were important to group behind the journal: Denis de Rougemont and Gonzague de Reynold.","PeriodicalId":383312,"journal":{"name":"Studia Hibernica: Volume 48, Issue 1","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123638666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article provides a detailed account of the origins, ethos and distribution of charitable loan fund societies in Ireland between 1729 and 1823. Charitable loan fund societies differed from other early financial institutions because they were area-based philanthropic societies that sought to animate a philosophy of poverty relief that advocated self-help and self-reliance. They were institutional articulations of early modern ideas about the role and nature of charity and how charitable acts should be administered. This article explains the origins of the first charitable loan fund established by Dean Jonathan Swift in St Patrick’s Parish, Dublin city and provides new insights into the origins of the second loan fund operated by the Dublin Charitable Musical Society. It traces the spread of thirty-two charitable loan fund societies across Ireland in the second half of the eighteenth century and the first two decades of the nineteenth century and places them in the wider context of the associational culture that emerged in Ireland from the mid-eighteenth century. It provides a very brief account of the origins and modus operandi of each charitable loan society and argues that a critical factor impeding the greater spread of the loan fund schemes was a lack of capital.
{"title":"Institutionalising changing conceptualisations of charity in Ireland: charitable loan fund societies in Ireland, 1729-1823","authors":"Ray O’Connor","doi":"10.3828/sh.2022.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3828/sh.2022.3","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000This article provides a detailed account of the origins, ethos and distribution of charitable loan fund societies in Ireland between 1729 and 1823. Charitable loan fund societies differed from other early financial institutions because they were area-based philanthropic societies that sought to animate a philosophy of poverty relief that advocated self-help and self-reliance. They were institutional articulations of early modern ideas about the role and nature of charity and how charitable acts should be administered. This article explains the origins of the first charitable loan fund established by Dean Jonathan Swift in St Patrick’s Parish, Dublin city and provides new insights into the origins of the second loan fund operated by the Dublin Charitable Musical Society. It traces the spread of thirty-two charitable loan fund societies across Ireland in the second half of the eighteenth century and the first two decades of the nineteenth century and places them in the wider context of the associational culture that emerged in Ireland from the mid-eighteenth century. It provides a very brief account of the origins and modus operandi of each charitable loan society and argues that a critical factor impeding the greater spread of the loan fund schemes was a lack of capital.","PeriodicalId":383312,"journal":{"name":"Studia Hibernica: Volume 48, Issue 1","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132787861","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：