The authors describe a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with concomitant left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and aortic stenosis. Detailed haemodynamic assessment of the serial lesions was performed. Alcohol septal ablation resulted in a significant reduction of gradients across the left ventricular outflow tract.
{"title":"Haemodynamic Interplay Between Concomitant Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction and Aortic Stenosis.","authors":"Priya Bansal, Hamza Lodhi, Adithya Mathews, Anand Desai, Ramez Morcos, Brijeshwar Maini, Houman Khalili","doi":"10.15420/icr.2020.36","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2020.36","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors describe a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with concomitant left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and aortic stenosis. Detailed haemodynamic assessment of the serial lesions was performed. Alcohol septal ablation resulted in a significant reduction of gradients across the left ventricular outflow tract.</p>","PeriodicalId":38586,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Cardiology Review","volume":"16 ","pages":"e11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/36/e7/icr-16-e11.PMC8239956.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39045248","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-06-10eCollection Date: 2021-04-01DOI: 10.15420/icr.2021.10
Robert Sykes, Daniel Doherty, Kenneth Mangion, Andrew Morrow, Colin Berry
MI with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is caused by a heterogeneous group of vascular or myocardial disorders. MINOCA occurs in 5.15% of patients presenting with acute ST-segment elevation MI or non-ST segment elevation MI and prognosis is impaired. The diagnosis of MINOCA is made during coronary angiography following acute MI, where there is no stenosis ≥50% present in an infarct-related epicardial artery and no overt systemic aetiology for the presentation. Accurate diagnosis and subsequent management require the appropriate utilisation of intravascular imaging, coronary function testing and subsequent imaging to assess for myocardial disorders without coronary involvement. Although plaque-related MINOCA is currently managed with empirical secondary prevention strategies, there remains an unmet therapeutic need for targeted and evidence-based therapy for MINOCA patients and increased awareness of the recommended diagnostic pathway.
冠状动脉非阻塞性心肌梗死(MINOCA)是由一组不同的血管或心肌疾病引起的。在急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死或非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,5.15% 的患者会出现 MINOCA,且预后不良。MINOCA 的诊断是在急性心肌梗死后进行冠状动脉造影时做出的,此时梗死相关的心外膜动脉无≥50% 的狭窄,且无明显的全身病因。准确诊断和后续治疗需要适当利用血管内成像、冠状动脉功能测试和后续成像来评估未累及冠状动脉的心肌疾病。尽管斑块相关的 MINOCA 目前可通过经验性二级预防策略进行管理,但 MINOCA 患者的针对性循证治疗需求仍未得到满足,而且人们对推荐诊断途径的认识也有待提高。
{"title":"What an Interventionalist Needs to Know About MI with Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries.","authors":"Robert Sykes, Daniel Doherty, Kenneth Mangion, Andrew Morrow, Colin Berry","doi":"10.15420/icr.2021.10","DOIUrl":"10.15420/icr.2021.10","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>MI with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is caused by a heterogeneous group of vascular or myocardial disorders. MINOCA occurs in 5.15% of patients presenting with acute ST-segment elevation MI or non-ST segment elevation MI and prognosis is impaired. The diagnosis of MINOCA is made during coronary angiography following acute MI, where there is no stenosis ≥50% present in an infarct-related epicardial artery and no overt systemic aetiology for the presentation. Accurate diagnosis and subsequent management require the appropriate utilisation of intravascular imaging, coronary function testing and subsequent imaging to assess for myocardial disorders without coronary involvement. Although plaque-related MINOCA is currently managed with empirical secondary prevention strategies, there remains an unmet therapeutic need for targeted and evidence-based therapy for MINOCA patients and increased awareness of the recommended diagnostic pathway.</p>","PeriodicalId":38586,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Cardiology Review","volume":"16 ","pages":"e10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/80/db/icr-16-e10.PMC8218171.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39142805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-05-27eCollection Date: 2021-04-01DOI: 10.15420/icr.2021.04
Sveeta Badiani, Sanjeev Bhattacharyya, Nikoo Aziminia, Thomas A Treibel, Guy Lloyd
Current guidelines recommend aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis in the presence of symptoms or a left ventricular ejection fraction <50%. However, patients with less than severe aortic stenosis may also experience symptoms and recent literature suggests that the prognosis is not as benign as previously reported. There are no recommendations for patients with moderate aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction, despite the high associated morbidity and mortality. There is also some evidence that these patients may benefit from early aortic valve intervention. It is recognised that aortic stenosis not only affects the valve but also has a complex myocardial response. This review discusses the natural history of moderate aortic stenosis along with the role of multimodality imaging in risk stratification in these patients.
目前的指南建议在出现症状或左心室射血分数较高的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者行主动脉瓣置换术
{"title":"Moderate Aortic Stenosis: What is it and When Should We Intervene?","authors":"Sveeta Badiani, Sanjeev Bhattacharyya, Nikoo Aziminia, Thomas A Treibel, Guy Lloyd","doi":"10.15420/icr.2021.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2021.04","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current guidelines recommend aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis in the presence of symptoms or a left ventricular ejection fraction <50%. However, patients with less than severe aortic stenosis may also experience symptoms and recent literature suggests that the prognosis is not as benign as previously reported. There are no recommendations for patients with moderate aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction, despite the high associated morbidity and mortality. There is also some evidence that these patients may benefit from early aortic valve intervention. It is recognised that aortic stenosis not only affects the valve but also has a complex myocardial response. This review discusses the natural history of moderate aortic stenosis along with the role of multimodality imaging in risk stratification in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":38586,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Cardiology Review","volume":"16 ","pages":"e09"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/45/cf/icr-16-e09.PMC8201468.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39142804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-05-19eCollection Date: 2021-04-01DOI: 10.15420/icr.2021.05
Karel M Van Praet, Markus Kofler, Timo Z Nazari Shafti, Alaa Abd El Al, Antonia van Kampen, Andrea Amabile, Gianluca Torregrossa, Jörg Kempfert, Volkmar Falk, Husam H Balkhy, Stephan Jacobs
Minimally invasive coronary revascularisation was originally developed in the mid 1990s as minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) grafting is a less invasive approach compared to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to address targets in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). Since then, MIDCAB has evolved with the adoption of a robotic platform and the possibility to perform multivessel bypass procedures. Minimally invasive coronary revascularisation surgery also allows for a combination between the benefits of CABG and percutaneous coronary interventions for non-LAD lesions - a hybrid approach. Hybrid coronary revascularisation results in fewer blood transfusions, shorter hospital stay, decreased ventilation times and patients return to work sooner when compared to conventional CABG. This article reviews the available literature, describes standard approaches and considers topics, such as limited access procedures, indications and patient selection, diagnostics and imaging, techniques, anastomotic devices, hybrid coronary revascularisation and outcome analysis.
{"title":"Minimally Invasive Coronary Revascularisation Surgery: A Focused Review of the Available Literature.","authors":"Karel M Van Praet, Markus Kofler, Timo Z Nazari Shafti, Alaa Abd El Al, Antonia van Kampen, Andrea Amabile, Gianluca Torregrossa, Jörg Kempfert, Volkmar Falk, Husam H Balkhy, Stephan Jacobs","doi":"10.15420/icr.2021.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2021.05","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Minimally invasive coronary revascularisation was originally developed in the mid 1990s as minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) grafting is a less invasive approach compared to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to address targets in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). Since then, MIDCAB has evolved with the adoption of a robotic platform and the possibility to perform multivessel bypass procedures. Minimally invasive coronary revascularisation surgery also allows for a combination between the benefits of CABG and percutaneous coronary interventions for non-LAD lesions - a hybrid approach. Hybrid coronary revascularisation results in fewer blood transfusions, shorter hospital stay, decreased ventilation times and patients return to work sooner when compared to conventional CABG. This article reviews the available literature, describes standard approaches and considers topics, such as limited access procedures, indications and patient selection, diagnostics and imaging, techniques, anastomotic devices, hybrid coronary revascularisation and outcome analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":38586,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Cardiology Review","volume":"16 ","pages":"e08"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/eb/69/icr-16-e08.PMC8287382.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39210890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-05-01eCollection Date: 2021-04-01DOI: 10.15420/icr.2020.25
Ozan M Demir, Mhairi Bolland, Jonathan Curio, Lars Søndergaard, Josep Rodés-Cabau, Simon Redwood, Bernard Prendergast, Antonio Colombo, Mei Chau, Azeem Latib
Over the past decade, several transcatheter devices have been developed to address the treatment of severe mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients at high surgical risk, mainly aimed at repairing the native mitral valve (MV). MV repair devices have recently been shown to have high efficacy and safety. However, to replicate promising trial results, specific anatomical and pathophysiological criteria have to be met and operators need a high level of experience. As yet, the longer-term durability of transcatheter MV repair remains unknown. Transcatheter MV replacement (TMVR) might be a treatment option able to target various anatomies, reliably abolish MR, and foster ease of use with a standardised implantation protocol. This review presents upcoming TMVR devices and available data and discusses how TMVR might further advance the field of transcatheter treatment of MR.
{"title":"Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: Current Evidence and Concepts.","authors":"Ozan M Demir, Mhairi Bolland, Jonathan Curio, Lars Søndergaard, Josep Rodés-Cabau, Simon Redwood, Bernard Prendergast, Antonio Colombo, Mei Chau, Azeem Latib","doi":"10.15420/icr.2020.25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2020.25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the past decade, several transcatheter devices have been developed to address the treatment of severe mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients at high surgical risk, mainly aimed at repairing the native mitral valve (MV). MV repair devices have recently been shown to have high efficacy and safety. However, to replicate promising trial results, specific anatomical and pathophysiological criteria have to be met and operators need a high level of experience. As yet, the longer-term durability of transcatheter MV repair remains unknown. Transcatheter MV replacement (TMVR) might be a treatment option able to target various anatomies, reliably abolish MR, and foster ease of use with a standardised implantation protocol. This review presents upcoming TMVR devices and available data and discusses how TMVR might further advance the field of transcatheter treatment of MR.</p>","PeriodicalId":38586,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Cardiology Review","volume":"16 ","pages":"e07"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/51/25/icr-16-e07.PMC8135015.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38936878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-04-05eCollection Date: 2021-04-01DOI: 10.15420/icr.2020.30
Suleiman Suleiman, J J Coughlan, George Touma, Richard Szirt
The optimal management of bifurcation lesions has received significant interest in recent years and remains a matter of debate among the interventional cardiology community. Bifurcation lesions are encountered in approximately 21% of percutaneous coronary intervention procedures and are associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiac events. The Medina classification has been developed in an attempt to standardise the terminology when describing bifurcation lesions. The focus of this article is on the management of the Medina 0,0,1 lesion ('Medina 001'), an uncommon lesion encountered in <5% of all bifurcations. Technical considerations, management options and interventional techniques relating to the Medina 001 lesion are discussed. In addition, current published data supporting the various proposed interventional treatment strategies are examined in an attempt to delineate an evidence-based approach to this uncommon lesion.
{"title":"Contemporary Management of Isolated Ostial Side Branch Disease: An Evidence-based Approach to Medina 001 Bifurcations.","authors":"Suleiman Suleiman, J J Coughlan, George Touma, Richard Szirt","doi":"10.15420/icr.2020.30","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2020.30","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The optimal management of bifurcation lesions has received significant interest in recent years and remains a matter of debate among the interventional cardiology community. Bifurcation lesions are encountered in approximately 21% of percutaneous coronary intervention procedures and are associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiac events. The Medina classification has been developed in an attempt to standardise the terminology when describing bifurcation lesions. The focus of this article is on the management of the Medina 0,0,1 lesion ('Medina 001'), an uncommon lesion encountered in <5% of all bifurcations. Technical considerations, management options and interventional techniques relating to the Medina 001 lesion are discussed. In addition, current published data supporting the various proposed interventional treatment strategies are examined in an attempt to delineate an evidence-based approach to this uncommon lesion.</p>","PeriodicalId":38586,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Cardiology Review","volume":"16 ","pages":"e06"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/55/15/icr-16-e06.PMC8054348.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38906984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-03-31eCollection Date: 2021-04-01DOI: 10.15420/icr.2020.18
Kenneth Jordan Ng Cheong Chung, Chris Wilkinson, Murugapathy Veerasamy, Vijay Kunadian
The world's population is ageing, resulting in more people with frailty receiving treatment for cardiovascular disease (CVD). The emergence of novel interventions, such as transcatheter aortic valve implantation, has also increased the proportion of older patients being treated in later stages of life. This increasing population burden makes the assessment of frailty of utmost importance, especially in patients with CVD. Despite a growing body of evidence on the association between frailty and CVD, there is no consensus on the optimal frailty assessment tool for use in clinical settings. Previous studies have shown limited concordance between validated frailty instruments. This review evaluates the evidence on the utility of frailty assessment tools in patients with CVD, and the effect of frailty on different outcomes measured.
{"title":"Frailty Scores and Their Utility in Older Patients with Cardiovascular Disease.","authors":"Kenneth Jordan Ng Cheong Chung, Chris Wilkinson, Murugapathy Veerasamy, Vijay Kunadian","doi":"10.15420/icr.2020.18","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2020.18","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The world's population is ageing, resulting in more people with frailty receiving treatment for cardiovascular disease (CVD). The emergence of novel interventions, such as transcatheter aortic valve implantation, has also increased the proportion of older patients being treated in later stages of life. This increasing population burden makes the assessment of frailty of utmost importance, especially in patients with CVD. Despite a growing body of evidence on the association between frailty and CVD, there is no consensus on the optimal frailty assessment tool for use in clinical settings. Previous studies have shown limited concordance between validated frailty instruments. This review evaluates the evidence on the utility of frailty assessment tools in patients with CVD, and the effect of frailty on different outcomes measured.</p>","PeriodicalId":38586,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Cardiology Review","volume":"16 ","pages":"e05"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/73/cf/icr-16-e05.PMC8054346.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38906983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-03-25eCollection Date: 2021-04-01DOI: 10.15420/icr.2021.02
Philip MacCarthy, Dave Smith, Douglas Muir, Daniel Blackman, Mamta Buch, Peter Ludman, Clare Appleby, Nick Curzen, David Hildick-Smith, Neal Uren, Mark Turner, Uday Trivedi, Adrian Banning
Pub Date : 2021-03-25eCollection Date: 2021-04-01DOI: 10.15420/icr.2020.03
Cameron McAlister, David Smyth
In The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Thomas Kuhn, the American philosopher of science, argued that scientific advances occur by revolution when the dominant scientific theory of the day is lacking and is rapidly replaced by a new radical theory.1 For example, the European voyages to the Americas in the 15th and 16th centuries required accurate navigation. The prevalent geocentric view at the time, that the celestial bodies circled the Earth, was woefully inaccurate as a basis for transatlantic navigation. Accordingly, the geocentric view was overthrown and rapidly superseded by the heliocentric view put forward by Copernicus, which provided much more accurate navigation. There was, to use Kuhn’s terminology, a paradigm shift. As with all revolutions, there were casualties. The imprisonment of Galileo is well known, but Michael Servetus (who is credited with describing pulmonary circulation before William Harvey) was burned at the stake under Calvin’s orders, partly for embracing this idea. The recent trials in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have resulted in a paradigm shift away from surgical aortic valve replacement (sAVR) as the gold standard definitive therapy in the treatment of aortic stenosis.2–8 It seems that a revolution is underway in the treatment of aortic stenosis, but hopefully without imprisonments or burnings.
{"title":"Shifting Paradigms and Financing a Revolution: Providing Transcatheter Valves in the Public Health System. A View from Aotearoa New Zealand.","authors":"Cameron McAlister, David Smyth","doi":"10.15420/icr.2020.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2020.03","url":null,"abstract":"In The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Thomas Kuhn, the American philosopher of science, argued that scientific advances occur by revolution when the dominant scientific theory of the day is lacking and is rapidly replaced by a new radical theory.1 For example, the European voyages to the Americas in the 15th and 16th centuries required accurate navigation. The prevalent geocentric view at the time, that the celestial bodies circled the Earth, was woefully inaccurate as a basis for transatlantic navigation. Accordingly, the geocentric view was overthrown and rapidly superseded by the heliocentric view put forward by Copernicus, which provided much more accurate navigation. There was, to use Kuhn’s terminology, a paradigm shift. As with all revolutions, there were casualties. The imprisonment of Galileo is well known, but Michael Servetus (who is credited with describing pulmonary circulation before William Harvey) was burned at the stake under Calvin’s orders, partly for embracing this idea. The recent trials in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have resulted in a paradigm shift away from surgical aortic valve replacement (sAVR) as the gold standard definitive therapy in the treatment of aortic stenosis.2–8 It seems that a revolution is underway in the treatment of aortic stenosis, but hopefully without imprisonments or burnings.","PeriodicalId":38586,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Cardiology Review","volume":"16 ","pages":"e04"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/91/e0/icr-16-e04.PMC8054347.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38906982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-03-23eCollection Date: 2021-03-01DOI: 10.15420/icr.2021.S2
{"title":"Acute Cardiac Unloading and Recovery: Proceedings of the 5th Annual Acute Cardiac Unloading and REcovery (A-CURE) symposium held on 14 December 2020.","authors":"","doi":"10.15420/icr.2021.S2","DOIUrl":"10.15420/icr.2021.S2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38586,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Cardiology Review","volume":"16 Suppl 2","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2021-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8108564/pdf/icr-16-Suppl2.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38898369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}