首页 > 最新文献

中华肿瘤杂志最新文献

英文 中文
[Chinese Medical Association guideline for clinical diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer (2024 edition)]. [中华医学会肺癌临床诊治指南(2024 年版)》。]
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240510-00189

To further standardize lung cancer prevention and treatment measures in China, enhance the quality of diagnosis and treatment, improve patient prognosis, and provide evidence-based medical guidance for clinicians at all levels, the Chinese Medical Association convened experts from respiratory medicine, oncology, thoracic surgery, radiotherapy, imaging, and pathology to develop the Chinese Medical Association's Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines for Lung Cancer (2024 edition). This consensus resulted in several updates from the 2023 version. The 2024 guidelines highlight that the risk of lung cancer in smokers remains higher than that of non-smokers even 15 years after quitting. Additionally, a new lung cancer incidence risk model is expected to become a critical tool for screening high-risk groups. In pathology, the guidelines now include pathological evaluation of surgically resected lung cancer specimens following neoadjuvant therapy and suggest that immunohistochemical staining of certain transcription factors may aid in the classification of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In molecular detection, the guidelines propose simultaneous detection of driver gene variations based on both RNA and DNA from specimens. The new edition also provides detailed descriptions of patient selection and surgical requirements for thoracic sub-lobectomy, aligned with the 9th TNM staging. Moreover, the guidelines expand treatment options, approving more therapies for immunoadjuvant and EGFR-TKI resistant lung cancer patients, as well as additional drug options for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations, EGFR 20 insertions, ALK fusions, and MET exon 14 skipping. These recommendations are based on state-approved drug applications, international guidelines, and current clinical practices in China, integrating the latest evidence-based medical research in screening, diagnosis, pathology, genetic testing, immune molecular marker detection, treatment methods, and follow-up care. The goal is to provide comprehensive and reasonable recommendations for clinicians, imaging specialists, laboratory technicians, rehabilitation professionals, and other medical staff at all levels.

为进一步规范我国肺癌防治措施,提高诊疗质量,改善患者预后,为各级临床医师提供循证医学指导,中华医学会召集呼吸内科、肿瘤科、胸外科、放疗科、影像科、病理科等科室专家,制定了《中华医学会肺癌临床诊疗指南(2024年版)》。这一共识在 2023 年版的基础上进行了多项更新。2024 年版指南强调,即使在戒烟 15 年后,吸烟者罹患肺癌的风险仍高于非吸烟者。此外,新的肺癌发病风险模型有望成为筛查高危人群的重要工具。在病理学方面,指南新增了对新辅助治疗后手术切除的肺癌标本进行病理学评估的内容,并建议对某些转录因子进行免疫组化染色,以帮助对小细胞肺癌(SCLC)进行分类。在分子检测方面,指南建议根据标本中的 RNA 和 DNA 同时检测驱动基因变异。新版指南还详细介绍了胸腔下叶切除术的患者选择和手术要求,并与第9版TNM分期保持一致。此外,指南还扩大了治疗选择范围,批准了更多针对免疫佐剂和表皮生长因子受体-TKI耐药肺癌患者的疗法,以及针对表皮生长因子受体突变、表皮生长因子受体20插入、ALK融合和MET外显子14跳越的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的更多药物选择。这些建议基于国家批准的药物申请、国际指南和中国目前的临床实践,整合了筛查、诊断、病理、基因检测、免疫分子标记物检测、治疗方法和随访护理等方面的最新循证医学研究。目的是为临床医生、影像学专家、实验室技术人员、康复专业人员和其他各级医务人员提供全面合理的建议。
{"title":"[Chinese Medical Association guideline for clinical diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer (2024 edition)].","authors":"","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240510-00189","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240510-00189","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To further standardize lung cancer prevention and treatment measures in China, enhance the quality of diagnosis and treatment, improve patient prognosis, and provide evidence-based medical guidance for clinicians at all levels, the Chinese Medical Association convened experts from respiratory medicine, oncology, thoracic surgery, radiotherapy, imaging, and pathology to develop the Chinese Medical Association's Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines for Lung Cancer (2024 edition). This consensus resulted in several updates from the 2023 version. The 2024 guidelines highlight that the risk of lung cancer in smokers remains higher than that of non-smokers even 15 years after quitting. Additionally, a new lung cancer incidence risk model is expected to become a critical tool for screening high-risk groups. In pathology, the guidelines now include pathological evaluation of surgically resected lung cancer specimens following neoadjuvant therapy and suggest that immunohistochemical staining of certain transcription factors may aid in the classification of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In molecular detection, the guidelines propose simultaneous detection of driver gene variations based on both RNA and DNA from specimens. The new edition also provides detailed descriptions of patient selection and surgical requirements for thoracic sub-lobectomy, aligned with the 9th TNM staging. Moreover, the guidelines expand treatment options, approving more therapies for immunoadjuvant and EGFR-TKI resistant lung cancer patients, as well as additional drug options for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations, EGFR 20 insertions, ALK fusions, and MET exon 14 skipping. These recommendations are based on state-approved drug applications, international guidelines, and current clinical practices in China, integrating the latest evidence-based medical research in screening, diagnosis, pathology, genetic testing, immune molecular marker detection, treatment methods, and follow-up care. The goal is to provide comprehensive and reasonable recommendations for clinicians, imaging specialists, laboratory technicians, rehabilitation professionals, and other medical staff at all levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":39868,"journal":{"name":"中华肿瘤杂志","volume":"46 ","pages":"805-843"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141752978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Trends of stomach cancer incidence and mortality in Shandong province from 2012 to 2012 and predictions from 2023 to 2030]. [2012-2012年山东省胃癌发病率和死亡率趋势及2023-2030年预测]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20231227-00387
F Jiang, Z T Fu, Z L Lu, J Chu, X H Xu, X L Guo, J X Ma

Objective: We aimed to analyse the trend of incidence and mortality of stomach cancer in Shandong province from 2012 to 2022 and predict the development trend from 2023 to 2030. Methods: Data on incidence and mortality of stomach cancer in Shandong province from 2012 to 2022 were obtained from Shandong Cancer Registry. The incidence, age-specific incidence, mortality and age-specific mortality in different years, sexes and urban and rural areas were calculated, the rates were standardized based on the age composition of the Chinese standard population in 2000. The average annual percent change (AAPC) of incidence and mortality was calculated using Joinpoint software. The Bayesian age-period-cohort model was used to predict the trend of stomach cancer incidence and mortality from 2023 to 2030. Results: From 2012 to 2022, the stomach cancer age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) and age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR) showed a decreasing trend. The ASIR decreased from 27.47/100 000 in 2012 to 16.06/100 000 in 2022 (AAPC=-5.10%, P<0.001), and the ASMR decreased from 17.69/100 000 to 11.09/100 000 (AAPC=-5.52%, P<0.001). The ASIR and ASMR of male, female, urban and rural population also showed downward trends. The incidence and mortality rates of men were always higher than those of women, and the difference between urban and rural areas is gradually narrowing. In 2022, the ASIR (16.09/100 000 in urban and 16.03/100 000 in rural) and the ASMR (11.10/100 000 in urban and 11.08/100 000 in rural) of stomach cancer between urban and rural areas were nearly identical. The Bayesian age-period-cohort model predicted that the ASIR of stomach cancer in Shandong would further decrease from 2023 to 2030 (AAPC=-0.51%, P=0.001), but the change tended to be smooth. The incidences in male (AAPC=-1.46%, P=0.010) and rural areas (AAPC=-1.21%, P<0.001) were still expected to have a little room for decline. The trend of incidences in female and urban areas were not statistically significant. The trend of mortality was consistent with the incidence. Conclusions: The stomach cancer incidence and mortality in Shandong shows a decreasing trend and it is expected to decrease further by 2030. However, the trend tends to be smooth, and the disease burden should be reduced as early as possible for high-risk population and high-risk factors of stomach cancer.

研究目的分析山东省 2012 年至 2022 年胃癌发病率和死亡率的变化趋势,并预测 2023 年至 2030 年的发展趋势。方法2012-2022年山东省胃癌发病率和死亡率数据来自山东省肿瘤登记中心。计算不同年份、性别和城乡地区的发病率、年龄特异性发病率、死亡率和年龄特异性死亡率,并根据 2000 年中国标准人口的年龄构成进行标准化。使用 Joinpoint 软件计算了发病率和死亡率的年均百分比变化(AAPC)。采用贝叶斯年龄-时期-队列模型预测了2023年至2030年胃癌发病率和死亡率的变化趋势。结果显示2012年至2022年,胃癌年龄标准化发病率(ASIR)和年龄标准化死亡率(ASMR)呈下降趋势。年龄标准化发病率从2012年的27.47/10万降至2022年的16.06/10万(AAPC=-5.10%,P<0.001),年龄标准化死亡率从17.69/10万降至11.09/10万(AAPC=-5.52%,P<0.001)。男性、女性、城市和农村人口的 ASIR 和 ASMR 也呈下降趋势。男性发病率和死亡率始终高于女性,城乡差异逐渐缩小。2022 年,城市和农村地区胃癌的 ASIR(城市 16.09/100000,农村 16.03/100000)和 ASMR(城市 11.10/100000,农村 11.08/100000)几乎相同。根据贝叶斯年龄-时期-队列模型预测,从2023年到2030年,山东的胃癌ASIR将进一步下降(AAPC=-0.51%,P=0.001),但变化趋于平稳。男性发病率(AAPC=-1.46%,P=0.010)和农村发病率(AAPC=-1.21%,P<0.001)预计仍有一定的下降空间。女性和城市地区的发病率趋势无统计学意义。死亡率的趋势与发病率一致。结论山东的胃癌发病率和死亡率呈下降趋势,预计到 2030 年将进一步下降。但趋势趋于平稳,对于胃癌高危人群和高危因素,应尽早减轻疾病负担。
{"title":"[Trends of stomach cancer incidence and mortality in Shandong province from 2012 to 2012 and predictions from 2023 to 2030].","authors":"F Jiang, Z T Fu, Z L Lu, J Chu, X H Xu, X L Guo, J X Ma","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20231227-00387","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20231227-00387","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> We aimed to analyse the trend of incidence and mortality of stomach cancer in Shandong province from 2012 to 2022 and predict the development trend from 2023 to 2030. <b>Methods:</b> Data on incidence and mortality of stomach cancer in Shandong province from 2012 to 2022 were obtained from Shandong Cancer Registry. The incidence, age-specific incidence, mortality and age-specific mortality in different years, sexes and urban and rural areas were calculated, the rates were standardized based on the age composition of the Chinese standard population in 2000. The average annual percent change (AAPC) of incidence and mortality was calculated using Joinpoint software. The Bayesian age-period-cohort model was used to predict the trend of stomach cancer incidence and mortality from 2023 to 2030. <b>Results:</b> From 2012 to 2022, the stomach cancer age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) and age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR) showed a decreasing trend. The ASIR decreased from 27.47/100 000 in 2012 to 16.06/100 000 in 2022 (AAPC=-5.10%, <i>P</i><0.001), and the ASMR decreased from 17.69/100 000 to 11.09/100 000 (AAPC=-5.52%, <i>P</i><0.001). The ASIR and ASMR of male, female, urban and rural population also showed downward trends. The incidence and mortality rates of men were always higher than those of women, and the difference between urban and rural areas is gradually narrowing. In 2022, the ASIR (16.09/100 000 in urban and 16.03/100 000 in rural) and the ASMR (11.10/100 000 in urban and 11.08/100 000 in rural) of stomach cancer between urban and rural areas were nearly identical. The Bayesian age-period-cohort model predicted that the ASIR of stomach cancer in Shandong would further decrease from 2023 to 2030 (AAPC=-0.51%, <i>P</i>=0.001), but the change tended to be smooth. The incidences in male (AAPC=-1.46%, <i>P=</i>0.010) and rural areas (AAPC=-1.21%, <i>P</i><0.001) were still expected to have a little room for decline. The trend of incidences in female and urban areas were not statistically significant. The trend of mortality was consistent with the incidence. <b>Conclusions:</b> The stomach cancer incidence and mortality in Shandong shows a decreasing trend and it is expected to decrease further by 2030. However, the trend tends to be smooth, and the disease burden should be reduced as early as possible for high-risk population and high-risk factors of stomach cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":39868,"journal":{"name":"中华肿瘤杂志","volume":"46 9","pages":"871-877"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297762","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Expedited program and utilization for anticancer drug approval in China and the United States]. [中国和美国的抗癌药审批加急项目及使用情况]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20231024-00250
Q Zhu, H Y Huang, A Q Yu, X Y Meng, Y Leng, H Fang, Z W Li, Y Tang, J Li, N Li

Objective: To systematically summarize and comparatively analyze the development, establishment and usage of oncology drugs speedy review approaches in China and in the United States between 2012 and 2021. Methods: Based on National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) websites, the development and current status of the speedy review approaches were consulted and summarized. Approved oncology drugs in China and in the United States (87 in China, 118 in the United States) over the past decade were analyzed using chi-square test for group comparison. Results: Five speedy approaches have been established in China and in the United States, three of which are the same, priority review, conditional approval or accelerated approval and breakthrough therapy. The rest two are special review and approval, special examination and approval in China, and fast track and real-time oncology review in the United States. Compared to the United States, speedy review approaches in China set up late (1992 vs. 2005). The overall utilization rates of the oncology drugs speedy review approaches were similar between the China and United States (90.8% vs. 92.4%, P=0.800) in the previous 10 years, and priority review have highest utilization rates in both China and the United States without significant group difference (77.0% vs. 82.2%, P=0.381); relatively low utilization rates of conditional approval (31.0% vs. 44.9%, P=0.041) and breakthrough therapy (2.3% vs. 50.0%, P<0.001) were seen in China. 52.9% of new drugs applied for special examination and approval in China and 40.7% of new drugs applied for fast track in the United States. Overall, the priority review both in China and the United States are stable, with a similar average annual utilization rate (84.8% vs. 83.7%); accelerated approval and breakthrough therapies in the United States fluctuate wildly, but the situation is tending towards stability in the last 3 years. Conclusions: Both China and the United States have established a relatively complete accelerated review system, with an overall utilization rate over 90%; China's accelerated review started late, although the overall utilization rate is close to that of the United States. The utilization rates of conditional approval and breakthrough therapy are still relatively low. Flexible usage of speedy review approaches, gaining regulatory recognition to use alternative endpoints, achieving real-time review and guidance are keys to accelerate new drug development in China.

目的系统总结和比较分析 2012 年至 2021 年间中国和美国肿瘤药物快速审评方法的发展、建立和使用情况。方法:基于国家医药管理局(NMPA)和美国食品药品管理局(FDA)网站,查阅并总结了快速审评方法的发展和现状。采用卡方检验对过去十年中国和美国获批的肿瘤药物(中国87种,美国118种)进行分组比较分析。结果显示中国和美国已建立了五种快速通道,其中三种是相同的,即优先审评、有条件批准或加速批准和突破性治疗。其余两种分别是中国的特殊审评审批、特殊审批,美国的快速通道和肿瘤实时审评。与美国相比,中国的快速审评方式设立较晚(1992 年与 2005 年)。在过去10年中,中美两国肿瘤药物快速审评方法的总体使用率相似(90.8% vs. 92.4%,P=0.800),优先审评在中美两国的使用率最高,且无显著组间差异(77.0% vs. 82.2%,P=0.381);中国有条件批准(31.0% vs. 44.9%,P=0.041)和突破性治疗(2.3% vs. 50.0%,P<0.001)的使用率相对较低。52.9%的新药在中国申请了特殊审批,40.7%的新药在美国申请了快速通道。总体而言,中国和美国的优先审评都比较稳定,年均使用率相近(84.8% vs. 83.7%);美国的加速审批和突破性疗法波动较大,但近三年情况趋于稳定。结论:中国和美国都建立了比较完善的加速审评制度,总体利用率超过90%;中国的加速审评起步较晚,但总体利用率接近美国。有条件批准和突破性疗法的使用率还相对较低。灵活运用快速审评方法,获得监管部门对使用替代终点的认可,实现实时审评和指导,是中国加快新药研发的关键。
{"title":"[Expedited program and utilization for anticancer drug approval in China and the United States].","authors":"Q Zhu, H Y Huang, A Q Yu, X Y Meng, Y Leng, H Fang, Z W Li, Y Tang, J Li, N Li","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20231024-00250","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20231024-00250","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To systematically summarize and comparatively analyze the development, establishment and usage of oncology drugs speedy review approaches in China and in the United States between 2012 and 2021. <b>Methods:</b> Based on National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) websites, the development and current status of the speedy review approaches were consulted and summarized. Approved oncology drugs in China and in the United States (87 in China, 118 in the United States) over the past decade were analyzed using chi-square test for group comparison. <b>Results:</b> Five speedy approaches have been established in China and in the United States, three of which are the same, priority review, conditional approval or accelerated approval and breakthrough therapy. The rest two are special review and approval, special examination and approval in China, and fast track and real-time oncology review in the United States. Compared to the United States, speedy review approaches in China set up late (1992 vs. 2005). The overall utilization rates of the oncology drugs speedy review approaches were similar between the China and United States (90.8% vs. 92.4%, <i>P</i>=0.800) in the previous 10 years, and priority review have highest utilization rates in both China and the United States without significant group difference (77.0% vs. 82.2%, <i>P</i>=0.381); relatively low utilization rates of conditional approval (31.0% vs. 44.9%, <i>P</i>=0.041) and breakthrough therapy (2.3% vs. 50.0%, <i>P</i><0.001) were seen in China. 52.9% of new drugs applied for special examination and approval in China and 40.7% of new drugs applied for fast track in the United States. Overall, the priority review both in China and the United States are stable, with a similar average annual utilization rate (84.8% vs. 83.7%); accelerated approval and breakthrough therapies in the United States fluctuate wildly, but the situation is tending towards stability in the last 3 years. <b>Conclusions:</b> Both China and the United States have established a relatively complete accelerated review system, with an overall utilization rate over 90%; China's accelerated review started late, although the overall utilization rate is close to that of the United States. The utilization rates of conditional approval and breakthrough therapy are still relatively low. Flexible usage of speedy review approaches, gaining regulatory recognition to use alternative endpoints, achieving real-time review and guidance are keys to accelerate new drug development in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":39868,"journal":{"name":"中华肿瘤杂志","volume":"46 9","pages":"904-910"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297759","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Chinese expert consensus on the systemic treatment of advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (2024 edition)]. [晚期透明细胞肾细胞癌系统治疗中国专家共识(2024 年版)]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240322-00117

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for approximately 2% to 3% of malignant tumors in adults, with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 1.5∶1 worldwide. It can occur in all age groups, with a peak incidence in the 60-70 age range, and the median age is approximately 64 years. The current causes of kidney cancer are still unclear, but smoking, obesity, hypertension, and some genetic factors are considered risk factors for kidney cancer development. Conducive to the gradual popularization of physical examination and screening, more and more patients with kidney cancer are being detected and treated in the early stages. However, nearly 30% of patients still have locally advanced or metastatic kidney cancer at the time of initial diagnosis. Traditional chemotherapy drugs are generally ineffective for advanced RCC, and currently, advanced RCC is mainly treated with anti-vascular and immunotherapy. At present, first-line treatment is mostly stratified based on clinical characteristics such as International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) prognosis risk, and there are multiple options available, including anti vascular therapy, anti-vascular combined immunotherapy, and dual immunotherapy. Subsequently, first-line treatment often selects drugs based on the composition, effectiveness, and safety of first-line treatment plans. In recent years, research has found that the molecular typing and metastasis characteristics of RCC also affect the prognosis of patients, leading to many controversies in the treatment of advanced RCC. This consensus is guided by the controversial clinical issues in the management of advanced RCC. After discussion and voting by multidisciplinary clinical experts, a consensus of 10 clinical issues has been reached. At the same time, experts recommend domestic clinical and research institutions to lead or participate in more large-scale clinical trials, providing more basis for clinical decision-making and the selection of the best beneficiaries.

肾细胞癌(RCC)约占成人恶性肿瘤的 2% 至 3%,全球男女比例约为 1.5∶1。肾癌可发生于所有年龄组,发病高峰为 60-70 岁,中位年龄约为 64 岁。目前肾癌的发病原因尚不明确,但吸烟、肥胖、高血压和一些遗传因素被认为是肾癌发病的危险因素。随着体检和筛查的逐步普及,越来越多的肾癌患者被早期发现和治疗。然而,仍有近 30% 的患者在初诊时已是局部晚期或转移性肾癌。传统的化疗药物对晚期 RCC 一般无效,目前晚期 RCC 主要采用抗血管和免疫治疗。目前,一线治疗大多根据临床特征(如国际 mRCC 数据库联盟(IMDC)预后风险)进行分层,有多种选择,包括抗血管治疗、抗血管联合免疫治疗和双重免疫治疗。随后,一线治疗往往根据一线治疗方案的组成、有效性和安全性来选择药物。近年来,研究发现RCC的分子分型和转移特征也会影响患者的预后,从而导致晚期RCC的治疗存在诸多争议。本共识以晚期 RCC 治疗中存在争议的临床问题为指导。经过多学科临床专家的讨论和投票,就 10 个临床问题达成共识。同时,专家建议国内临床和研究机构主导或参与更多大规模临床试验,为临床决策和选择最佳受益者提供更多依据。
{"title":"[Chinese expert consensus on the systemic treatment of advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (2024 edition)].","authors":"","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240322-00117","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240322-00117","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for approximately 2% to 3% of malignant tumors in adults, with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 1.5∶1 worldwide. It can occur in all age groups, with a peak incidence in the 60-70 age range, and the median age is approximately 64 years. The current causes of kidney cancer are still unclear, but smoking, obesity, hypertension, and some genetic factors are considered risk factors for kidney cancer development. Conducive to the gradual popularization of physical examination and screening, more and more patients with kidney cancer are being detected and treated in the early stages. However, nearly 30% of patients still have locally advanced or metastatic kidney cancer at the time of initial diagnosis. Traditional chemotherapy drugs are generally ineffective for advanced RCC, and currently, advanced RCC is mainly treated with anti-vascular and immunotherapy. At present, first-line treatment is mostly stratified based on clinical characteristics such as International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) prognosis risk, and there are multiple options available, including anti vascular therapy, anti-vascular combined immunotherapy, and dual immunotherapy. Subsequently, first-line treatment often selects drugs based on the composition, effectiveness, and safety of first-line treatment plans. In recent years, research has found that the molecular typing and metastasis characteristics of RCC also affect the prognosis of patients, leading to many controversies in the treatment of advanced RCC. This consensus is guided by the controversial clinical issues in the management of advanced RCC. After discussion and voting by multidisciplinary clinical experts, a consensus of 10 clinical issues has been reached. At the same time, experts recommend domestic clinical and research institutions to lead or participate in more large-scale clinical trials, providing more basis for clinical decision-making and the selection of the best beneficiaries.</p>","PeriodicalId":39868,"journal":{"name":"中华肿瘤杂志","volume":"46 9","pages":"844-854"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[hsa_circ_0001776 targeting miR-1265 regulates the development of lung squamous cell carcinoma and clinical significance]. [靶向 miR-1265 的 hsa_circ_0001776 调控肺鳞癌的发展及其临床意义】。]
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20231024-00226
Z Q Hong, Y S Cui, Y P Tian, Y N Wu, X Zheng, Y Feng, G G Sun
<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To further explore the role and mechanism of hsa_circ_0001776 and mir-1265 in lung squamous carcinoma by verifying the expression level of hsa_circ_0001776 in plasma, tissues, and cells of lung squamous carcinoma. <b>Methods:</b> Plasma was collected from patients with lung squamous carcinoma treated at Tangshan People's Hospital and healthy individuals from 2020 to 2022. Lung squamous carcinoma tissue microarrays purchased from Shanghai Xinchao Biotechnology Company in 2022. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to detect the expression of hsa_circ_0001776 in lung squamous carcinoma plasma, tissues, and cells, and fluorescence in situ hybridization was used to verify the expression of hsa_circ_0001776 in lung squamous carcinoma. The localization of hsa_circ_0001776 in NCI-H1703 was verified by fluorescence in situ hybridization. The lung squamous carcinoma cells NCI-H1703 and NCI-H226 were cultured <i>in vitro</i> and divided into the circ-negative control (NC) group, hsa_circ_0001776 overexpression group, miR-NC group, miR-1265 mimic group, hsa_circ_0001776+miR-NC group, and hsa_circ_0001776+miR-1265 mimic group.The cell proliferation, motility and apoptosis were detected by the cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) method, clone formation, Transwell invasion and migration, and scratch assay, and flow cytometry, respectively. The downstream of hsa_circ_0001776 was predicted by circular RNA interactome website, and the interaction between hsa_circ_0001776, miR-1265 was further determined by dual luciferase reporter gene assay, and nude mice subcutaneous tumorigenesis assay detected the growth of transplanted tumors. <b>Results:</b> Fluorescence in situ hybridization results showed that the fluorescence intensity of hsa_circ_0001776 in lung squamous carcinoma tissues was lower than that in paracancerous tissues, and the fluorescence intensity of miR-1265 in lung squamous carcinoma tissues was higher than that in paracancerous tissues (both <i>P</i><0.05). The expression level of hsa_circ_0001776 in the plasma of lung squamous carcinoma patients was lower than that in the plasma of healthy people, and the expression level of miR-1265 was higher than that in the plasma of healthy people (both <i>P</i><0.05). The expression levels of hsa_circ_0001776 in lung squamous carcinoma cells NCI-H1703, NCI-H226 and SK-MES-1 were lower than that in bronchial epithelial cells BEAS-2B (all <i>P</i><0.05), and the relative expression levels of miR-1265 in NCI-H1703 and NCI-H226 were higher than that in human bronchial epithelial cells BEAS -2B (all <i>P</i><0.05). The expression of hsa_circ_0001776 was correlated with age, lymph node metastasis, clinical stage, and tumor stage in patients with lung squamous carcinoma (all <i>P</i><0.05). Fluorescence in situ hybridization results showed that hsa_circ_0001776 was mainly expressed in the cytoplasm. The results of dual-luciferase reporter assay showed complementary bindin
目的通过验证 hsa_circ_0001776 在肺鳞癌血浆、组织和细胞中的表达水平,进一步探讨 hsa_circ_0001776 和 mir-1265 在肺鳞癌中的作用和机制。研究方法采集2020年至2022年在唐山市人民医院接受治疗的肺鳞癌患者和健康人的血浆。肺鳞癌组织芯片于 2022 年购自上海新潮生物科技有限公司。采用实时定量聚合酶链反应(qRT-PCR)检测hsa_circ_0001776在肺鳞癌血浆、组织和细胞中的表达,采用荧光原位杂交验证hsa_circ_0001776在肺鳞癌中的表达。荧光原位杂交验证了 hsa_circ_0001776 在 NCI-H1703 中的定位。体外培养肺鳞癌细胞NCI-H1703和NCI-H226,分为circ阴性对照(NC)组、hsa_circ_0001776过表达组、miR-NC组、miR-1265模拟组、hsa_circ_0001776+miR-NC组和hsa_circ_0001776+miR-1265模拟组。分别采用细胞计数试剂盒-8(CCK-8)法、克隆形成法、Transwell侵袭与迁移法、划痕法和流式细胞术检测细胞增殖、运动和凋亡。循环RNA相互作用组网站预测了hsa_circ_0001776的下游,双荧光素酶报告基因实验进一步确定了hsa_circ_0001776与miR-1265的相互作用,裸鼠皮下肿瘤发生实验检测了移植肿瘤的生长情况。结果荧光原位杂交结果显示,hsa_circ_0001776在肺鳞癌组织中的荧光强度低于癌旁组织,miR-1265在肺鳞癌组织中的荧光强度高于癌旁组织(均P<0.05)。肺鳞癌患者血浆中 hsa_circ_0001776 的表达水平低于健康人血浆,而 miR-1265 的表达水平高于健康人血浆(均 P<0.05)。hsa_circ_0001776在肺鳞癌细胞NCI-H1703、NCI-H226和SK-MES-1中的表达水平低于支气管上皮细胞BEAS-2B(均P<0.05),miR-1265在NCI-H1703和NCI-H226中的相对表达水平高于人支气管上皮细胞BEAS-2B(均P<0.05)。在肺鳞癌患者中,hsa_circ_0001776的表达与年龄、淋巴结转移、临床分期和肿瘤分期相关(均P<0.05)。荧光原位杂交结果显示,hsa_circ_0001776主要在细胞质中表达。双荧光素酶报告实验结果显示 miR-1265 与 hsa_circ_0001776 互补结合。NCI-H1703和NCI-H226细胞中hsa_circ_0001776过表达组的吸光度值低于circ-NC组(P<0.05)。hsa_circ_0001776过表达组细胞克隆数为(52±3)和(53±4),迁移细胞数为(476±17)和(113±7),侵袭细胞数为(100±2)和(184±2),细胞迁移率为(25.00±4.36)%和(36.02±5.55)%,均低于circ-NC组[(104±4)和(106±2),(783±29)和(517±16),(657±45)和(473±9),(48.95±8.69)%和(48.70±1.57)%,均P<0.05]。过表达 hsa_circ_0001776 组的细胞凋亡率分别为(24.77±2.303)%和(19.67±1.16)%,均高于 circ-NC 组[分别为(11.83±1.15)%和(9.50±0.66)%,均 P<0.05]。miR-1265 mimic组在NCI-H1703和NCI-H226中的细胞凋亡率高于miR-NC组(P<0.05)。miR-1265 mimic组的细胞克隆率分别为(56±13)%和(51±8)%,迁移细胞分别为(556±13)%和(405±6)%,侵袭细胞分别为(486±6)%和(359±7)%,细胞迁移率分别为(68.miR-NC组[(31±4)和(21±8)、(154±19)和(186±5)、(227±6)和(176±7)、(25.83±4.26)%和(53.12±4.14)%,均P<0.05]。miR-1265模拟组的凋亡率分别为(11.83±2.55)%和(17.50±1.05)%,低于miR-NC组[分别为(32.67±4.44)%和(39.90±2.88)%,均PPP<0.05]。过表达 hsa_circ_0001776+miR-1265 模拟组的凋亡率分别为(19.27±0.15)%和(11.53±0.75)%,均低于过表达 hsa_circ_0001776+miR-NC 组[(27.77±1.29)%和(18.43±0.71)%,均 P<0.05]。裸鼠皮下肿瘤发生实验结果表明,过表达 hsa_circ_0001776 组的肿瘤体积低于 circ-NC 组(P<0.05)。
{"title":"[hsa_circ_0001776 targeting miR-1265 regulates the development of lung squamous cell carcinoma and clinical significance].","authors":"Z Q Hong, Y S Cui, Y P Tian, Y N Wu, X Zheng, Y Feng, G G Sun","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20231024-00226","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20231024-00226","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Objective:&lt;/b&gt; To further explore the role and mechanism of hsa_circ_0001776 and mir-1265 in lung squamous carcinoma by verifying the expression level of hsa_circ_0001776 in plasma, tissues, and cells of lung squamous carcinoma. &lt;b&gt;Methods:&lt;/b&gt; Plasma was collected from patients with lung squamous carcinoma treated at Tangshan People's Hospital and healthy individuals from 2020 to 2022. Lung squamous carcinoma tissue microarrays purchased from Shanghai Xinchao Biotechnology Company in 2022. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to detect the expression of hsa_circ_0001776 in lung squamous carcinoma plasma, tissues, and cells, and fluorescence in situ hybridization was used to verify the expression of hsa_circ_0001776 in lung squamous carcinoma. The localization of hsa_circ_0001776 in NCI-H1703 was verified by fluorescence in situ hybridization. The lung squamous carcinoma cells NCI-H1703 and NCI-H226 were cultured &lt;i&gt;in vitro&lt;/i&gt; and divided into the circ-negative control (NC) group, hsa_circ_0001776 overexpression group, miR-NC group, miR-1265 mimic group, hsa_circ_0001776+miR-NC group, and hsa_circ_0001776+miR-1265 mimic group.The cell proliferation, motility and apoptosis were detected by the cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) method, clone formation, Transwell invasion and migration, and scratch assay, and flow cytometry, respectively. The downstream of hsa_circ_0001776 was predicted by circular RNA interactome website, and the interaction between hsa_circ_0001776, miR-1265 was further determined by dual luciferase reporter gene assay, and nude mice subcutaneous tumorigenesis assay detected the growth of transplanted tumors. &lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; Fluorescence in situ hybridization results showed that the fluorescence intensity of hsa_circ_0001776 in lung squamous carcinoma tissues was lower than that in paracancerous tissues, and the fluorescence intensity of miR-1265 in lung squamous carcinoma tissues was higher than that in paracancerous tissues (both &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;<0.05). The expression level of hsa_circ_0001776 in the plasma of lung squamous carcinoma patients was lower than that in the plasma of healthy people, and the expression level of miR-1265 was higher than that in the plasma of healthy people (both &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;<0.05). The expression levels of hsa_circ_0001776 in lung squamous carcinoma cells NCI-H1703, NCI-H226 and SK-MES-1 were lower than that in bronchial epithelial cells BEAS-2B (all &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;<0.05), and the relative expression levels of miR-1265 in NCI-H1703 and NCI-H226 were higher than that in human bronchial epithelial cells BEAS -2B (all &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;<0.05). The expression of hsa_circ_0001776 was correlated with age, lymph node metastasis, clinical stage, and tumor stage in patients with lung squamous carcinoma (all &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;<0.05). Fluorescence in situ hybridization results showed that hsa_circ_0001776 was mainly expressed in the cytoplasm. The results of dual-luciferase reporter assay showed complementary bindin","PeriodicalId":39868,"journal":{"name":"中华肿瘤杂志","volume":"46 9","pages":"889-903"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Clinicopathological analysis of gastric adenocarcinoma with elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein and enteroblastic differentiation]. [伴有血清甲胎蛋白升高和肠细胞分化的胃腺癌的临床病理分析]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20230710-00004
L K Zan, L L Shen, X Zhang, N Gao, B G Tian, X X Geng, X Peng, J W Li, P Bu, G H Zhao

Objective: To investigate the immunophenotypic and molecular biological characteristics of patients with elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and enteroblastic differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma (GAED). Methods: The clinicopathological data of 13 patients with elevated serum AFP and GAED admitted to Shanxi Cancer Hospital from 2018 to 2020 were collected. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) were used to analyze the immune markers and molecular biological characteristics of the pathological tissues of the patients. Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test were used for survival analysis. Results: Among the 13 patients with GAED, 12 were male and 1 was female, aged 41-70 years, with a median age of 64 years. The lesions were mainly located in the gastric antrum (5 cases) and gastric body (4 cases). IHC results showed that the tumor embryonic protein (AFP, SALL4, GPC3), intestinal epithelial differentiation protein (CDX-2, CD10), and some original intestinal epithelial phenotype markers (OCT3/4, Claudin6) were expressed in the tumor tissues. Combined application of multiple markers can reduce the rate of missed diagnosis. Among the 13 patients, 12 had at least one mutation (1 mutation: 1 case, 2-5 mutations: 3 cases, 6-15 mutations: 8 cases), and 1 case was not detected. The gene with the highest mutation frequency was TP53 (10 cases), and other mutant genes included EPHB1 (3 cases), ATRX (2 cases), EPHA5 (2 cases), GATA3 (2 cases), LRP1B (2 cases) and MAP2K4 (2 cases) were also detected. Three of the 13 patients had structural variations, which were C14orf177-GNAS, AIM1-FGFR3, and EPHA6-ROS1 gene rearrangements. All 13 patients had copy number variation, and 11 patients had copy number variation of more than 2 genes. The common amplification genes were IRS2 (5 cases), PTEN (5 cases), GNAS (4 cases), CCNE1 (3 cases), CEBPA (3 cases), PCK1 (3 cases) and ERBB2 (2 cases). The common deletion genes were SOX2 (5 cases) and MYC (5 cases). Among the 13 patients, 4 died, and 2 of the dead patients had liver metastasis. There were 4 patients with disease-free survival and 5 patients with disease progression, including 3 cases of abdominal metastasis and 2 cases of liver metastasis. The 3-year survival rate of patients was 65.9 %, and the 3-year progression-free survival rate was 30.7 %. Gene LRP1B point mutation was associated with poor prognosis (P<0.001). There was no significant improvement in the prognosis of patients treated with immunotherapy compared with those treated with chemotherapy alone (P=0.595), but the prognosis of patients treated with postoperative chemotherapy or postoperative chemotherapy plus immunotherapy was better than that of patients treated with surgery alone (P<0.05). Conclusions: Elevated

研究目的研究血清甲胎蛋白(AFP)升高和肠细胞分化型胃腺癌(GAED)患者的免疫表型和分子生物学特征。研究方法收集山西省肿瘤医院2018年至2020年收治的13例血清甲胎蛋白(AFP)升高合并GAED患者的临床病理资料。采用免疫组化(IHC)和新一代测序(NGS)分析患者病理组织的免疫标志物和分子生物学特征。采用Kaplan-Meier法和对数秩检验进行生存分析。结果13例GAED患者中,男性12例,女性1例,年龄在41-70岁之间,中位年龄为64岁。病变主要位于胃窦(5 例)和胃体(4 例)。IHC 结果显示,肿瘤组织中表达了肿瘤胚胎蛋白(AFP、SALL4、GPC3)、肠上皮分化蛋白(CDX-2、CD10)和一些原始肠上皮表型标记物(OCT3/4、Claudin6)。联合应用多种标记物可以降低漏诊率。13 例患者中,12 例至少有一个基因突变(1 个基因突变:1 例;2-5 个基因突变:3 例;6-15 个基因突变:8 例),1 例未检出。突变频率最高的基因是 TP53(10 例),其他突变基因还包括 EPHB1(3 例)、ATRX(2 例)、EPHA5(2 例)、GATA3(2 例)、LRP1B(2 例)和 MAP2K4(2 例)。13 例患者中有 3 例存在结构变异,分别是 C14orf177-GNAS、AIM1-FGFR3 和 EPHA6-ROS1 基因重排。所有 13 名患者都有拷贝数变异,其中 11 名患者有两个以上基因的拷贝数变异。常见的扩增基因为IRS2(5例)、PTEN(5例)、GNAS(4例)、CCNE1(3例)、CEBPA(3例)、PCK1(3例)和ERBB2(2例)。常见的缺失基因为 SOX2(5 例)和 MYC(5 例)。13 名患者中有 4 人死亡,其中 2 人有肝转移。4名患者无病生存,5名患者病情进展,包括3例腹腔转移和2例肝脏转移。患者的 3 年生存率为 65.9%,3 年无进展生存率为 30.7%。基因LRP1B点突变与预后不良有关(P<0.001)。与单纯化疗相比,接受免疫治疗的患者预后无明显改善(P=0.595),但接受术后化疗或术后化疗加免疫治疗的患者预后优于单纯手术治疗的患者(P<0.05)。结论血清甲胎蛋白(AFP)升高伴GAED是一种具有独特分子特征的高侵袭性肿瘤,通常伴有多种分子事件。TP53基因突变是最常见的基因突变类型。此外,一些病例还伴有 HER2 扩增和基因重排。
{"title":"[Clinicopathological analysis of gastric adenocarcinoma with elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein and enteroblastic differentiation].","authors":"L K Zan, L L Shen, X Zhang, N Gao, B G Tian, X X Geng, X Peng, J W Li, P Bu, G H Zhao","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20230710-00004","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20230710-00004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the immunophenotypic and molecular biological characteristics of patients with elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and enteroblastic differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma (GAED). <b>Methods:</b> The clinicopathological data of 13 patients with elevated serum AFP and GAED admitted to Shanxi Cancer Hospital from 2018 to 2020 were collected. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) were used to analyze the immune markers and molecular biological characteristics of the pathological tissues of the patients. Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test were used for survival analysis. <b>Results:</b> Among the 13 patients with GAED, 12 were male and 1 was female, aged 41-70 years, with a median age of 64 years. The lesions were mainly located in the gastric antrum (5 cases) and gastric body (4 cases). IHC results showed that the tumor embryonic protein (AFP, SALL4, GPC3), intestinal epithelial differentiation protein (CDX-2, CD10), and some original intestinal epithelial phenotype markers (OCT3/4, Claudin6) were expressed in the tumor tissues. Combined application of multiple markers can reduce the rate of missed diagnosis. Among the 13 patients, 12 had at least one mutation (1 mutation: 1 case, 2-5 mutations: 3 cases, 6-15 mutations: 8 cases), and 1 case was not detected. The gene with the highest mutation frequency was <i>TP53</i> (10 cases), and other mutant genes included <i>EPHB1</i> (3 cases), <i>ATRX</i> (2 cases), <i>EPHA5</i> (2 cases), <i>GATA3</i> (2 cases), <i>LRP1B</i> (2 cases) and <i>MAP2K4</i> (2 cases) were also detected. Three of the 13 patients had structural variations, which were <i>C14orf177</i>-<i>GNAS</i>, <i>AIM1</i>-<i>FGFR3</i>, and <i>EPHA6</i>-<i>ROS1</i> gene rearrangements. All 13 patients had copy number variation, and 11 patients had copy number variation of more than 2 genes. The common amplification genes were <i>IRS2</i> (5 cases), <i>PTEN</i> (5 cases), <i>GNAS</i> (4 cases), <i>CCNE1</i> (3 cases), <i>CEBPA</i> (3 cases), <i>PCK1</i> (3 cases) and <i>ERBB2</i> (2 cases). The common deletion genes were <i>SOX2</i> (5 cases) and <i>MYC</i> (5 cases). Among the 13 patients, 4 died, and 2 of the dead patients had liver metastasis. There were 4 patients with disease-free survival and 5 patients with disease progression, including 3 cases of abdominal metastasis and 2 cases of liver metastasis. The 3-year survival rate of patients was 65.9 %, and the 3-year progression-free survival rate was 30.7 %. Gene <i>LRP1B</i> point mutation was associated with poor prognosis (<i>P</i><0.001). There was no significant improvement in the prognosis of patients treated with immunotherapy compared with those treated with chemotherapy alone (<i>P</i>=0.595), but the prognosis of patients treated with postoperative chemotherapy or postoperative chemotherapy plus immunotherapy was better than that of patients treated with surgery alone (<i>P</i><0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> Elevated","PeriodicalId":39868,"journal":{"name":"中华肿瘤杂志","volume":"46 7","pages":"686-695"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141735303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Spatial and temporal distribution characteristics research of esophageal cancer in China]. [中国食管癌时空分布特征研究]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20230726-00040
S P Lai, H M Su, Y W Liu, M Q Zhang, Z Q Huang, J X Liu, H Huang

Objectives: To explore the spatial distribution characteristics, trend changes, and spatial clustering of esophageal cancer among residents in China at the county (city, district) scale, a spatial epidemiological approach was used, with the aim of providing localized evidence for the prevention and treatment of esophageal cancer in China. Methods: The data source was the incidence (crude rate) and mortality (crude rate) of esophageal cancer from 2005 to 2016 in the 2008-2019 edition of China Cancer Registration Annual Report published by the National Cancer Center. The Joinpoint model was used for time trend analysis. The tumor registration area in 2016 was selected as the study area for spatial feature analysis, with a total of 487 counties (cities and districts), covering 27.6% of the national population. Spatial autocorrelation analysis was performed to reveal spatial distribution characteristics by using Arcgis 10.6 software, and spatial scanning statistics was used to analyze spatial clustering characteristics by using SaTScan 9.5 software. The log-likelihood ratio (LLR) and relative risk (RR) were calculated in different windows, and the region with the largest LLR value represented the most likely cluster. Results: From 2005 to 2016, the incidence and mortality rate of esophageal cancer in China showed a trend of increasing at first and then decreasing. The incidence and mortality rate of esophageal cancer in 2016 were characterized by spatial positive correlation. High incidence and high mortality were mainly concentrated in the areas through which the Huaihe River flowed. The primary clusters (taking high incidence rate as an example LLR=6 374.41, RR=2.37, P<0.001) were mainly distributed in Jiangsu, Anhui and Shandong in eastern China and eastern Henan and southern Hebei in central China, and secondary clusters (taking high incidence rate as an example LLR=1 971.19, RR=1.91, P<0.001) in Gansu, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Shaanxi, Sichuan and other central and western regions. Conclusions: The incidence and mortality of esophageal cancer in China have decreased since 2010. The disease burden of esophageal cancer has obvious spatial differences, and measures should be taken according to local conditions in high-risk cluster areas such as the Huaihe River basin.

研究目的以县(市、区)为单位,采用空间流行病学方法,探讨中国居民食管癌的空间分布特征、趋势变化和空间聚集性,为中国食管癌的防治提供本土化证据。研究方法数据来源为国家癌症中心发布的2008-2019年版《中国肿瘤登记年报》中2005-2016年食管癌的发病率(粗略率)和死亡率(粗略率)。采用Joinpoint模型进行时间趋势分析。选取2016年肿瘤登记地区作为空间特征分析的研究区域,共487个县(市、区),覆盖全国27.6%的人口。利用Arcgis 10.6软件进行空间自相关分析,揭示空间分布特征;利用SaTScan 9.5软件进行空间扫描统计,分析空间聚类特征。计算不同窗口的对数似然比(LLR)和相对风险(RR),LLR 值最大的区域代表最可能的聚类。结果显示2005-2016年,中国食管癌的发病率和死亡率呈先上升后下降的趋势。2016 年食管癌的发病率和死亡率呈现空间正相关的特点。高发病率和高死亡率主要集中在淮河流经地区。一级集群(以高发病率为例LLR=6 374.41,RR=2.37,P<0.001)主要分布在华东地区的江苏、安徽、山东和华中地区的河南东部、河北南部,二级集群(以高发病率为例LLR=1 971.19,RR=1.91,P<0.001),主要分布在甘肃省、宁夏回族自治区、陕西省、四川省等中西部地区。结论自 2010 年以来,中国食管癌的发病率和死亡率均有所下降。食管癌的疾病负担具有明显的空间差异,在淮河流域等高危聚集区应因地制宜采取措施。
{"title":"[Spatial and temporal distribution characteristics research of esophageal cancer in China].","authors":"S P Lai, H M Su, Y W Liu, M Q Zhang, Z Q Huang, J X Liu, H Huang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20230726-00040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20230726-00040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To explore the spatial distribution characteristics, trend changes, and spatial clustering of esophageal cancer among residents in China at the county (city, district) scale, a spatial epidemiological approach was used, with the aim of providing localized evidence for the prevention and treatment of esophageal cancer in China. <b>Methods:</b> The data source was the incidence (crude rate) and mortality (crude rate) of esophageal cancer from 2005 to 2016 in the 2008-2019 edition of China Cancer Registration Annual Report published by the National Cancer Center. The Joinpoint model was used for time trend analysis. The tumor registration area in 2016 was selected as the study area for spatial feature analysis, with a total of 487 counties (cities and districts), covering 27.6% of the national population. Spatial autocorrelation analysis was performed to reveal spatial distribution characteristics by using Arcgis 10.6 software, and spatial scanning statistics was used to analyze spatial clustering characteristics by using SaTScan 9.5 software. The log-likelihood ratio (<i>LLR</i>) and relative risk (<i>RR</i>) were calculated in different windows, and the region with the largest <i>LLR</i> value represented the most likely cluster. <b>Results:</b> From 2005 to 2016, the incidence and mortality rate of esophageal cancer in China showed a trend of increasing at first and then decreasing. The incidence and mortality rate of esophageal cancer in 2016 were characterized by spatial positive correlation. High incidence and high mortality were mainly concentrated in the areas through which the Huaihe River flowed. The primary clusters (taking high incidence rate as an example <i>LLR</i>=6 374.41, <i>RR</i>=2.37, <i>P</i><0.001) were mainly distributed in Jiangsu, Anhui and Shandong in eastern China and eastern Henan and southern Hebei in central China, and secondary clusters (taking high incidence rate as an example <i>LLR</i>=1 971.19, <i>RR</i>=1.91, <i>P</i><0.001) in Gansu, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Shaanxi, Sichuan and other central and western regions. <b>Conclusions:</b> The incidence and mortality of esophageal cancer in China have decreased since 2010. The disease burden of esophageal cancer has obvious spatial differences, and measures should be taken according to local conditions in high-risk cluster areas such as the Huaihe River basin.</p>","PeriodicalId":39868,"journal":{"name":"中华肿瘤杂志","volume":"46 7","pages":"657-662"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141735284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[The efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with niraparib in treating patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer]. [安罗替尼联合尼拉帕利治疗铂类耐药复发性卵巢癌患者的有效性和安全性]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20231024-00224
M Yang, J J Wang, S Q Deng, S S Liang, L Sun

Objectives: To investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with niraparib in treating patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Methods: Thirty-five patients with pathological confirmed platinum-resistant ovarian cancer who experienced progression after receiving at least two lines of standard treatment were eligible. All of them were treated with anlotinib combined with niraparib between September 2019 and October 2021. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The second endpoints included overall survival, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test, and influence factor analysis was performed using Cox proportional risk regression models. Results: The best overall response showed that partial response was observed in 14 patients, stable disease was noted within 13 patients, and progressive disease was found in 8 patients. Therefore, the ORR and DCR of these 35 patients were 40.0% (95% CI:22.9%-57.1%) and 77.1% (95% CI:62.9%-91.4%), respectively. The median follow-up duration was 18.9 months (6.9-32.2). The median PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI:5.35-7.66). Multivariate Cox regression analysis for PFS indicated that age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, and BRCA mutation status were independent factors influencing PFS (P<0.05). Additionally, the PFS in patients with BRCA mutation who have never received PARP inhibitor treatment was significantly longer than that in patients without BRCA mutation who have been exposed to prior PARPi treatment (15.0 vs 6.0 month, P=0.029). The most common treatment-related adverse reactions were fatigue (85.7%), hematologic toxic (85.7%) and hypertension (74.3%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusion: Anlotinib combined with niraparib shows a promising efficacy and tolerable safety in platinum-resistant ROC patients.

研究目的研究安罗替尼联合尼拉帕利治疗铂类耐药卵巢癌患者的有效性和安全性。方法35名病理确诊的铂类耐药卵巢癌患者在接受至少两线标准治疗后病情出现进展。他们均在2019年9月至2021年10月期间接受了安罗替尼联合尼拉帕利的治疗。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)。第二终点包括总生存期、客观反应率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)和安全性。生存期分析采用卡普兰-梅耶法和对数秩检验,影响因素分析采用考克斯比例风险回归模型。结果最佳总反应显示,14 名患者出现部分反应,13 名患者病情稳定,8 名患者病情进展。因此,这35名患者的ORR和DCR分别为40.0%(95% CI:22.9%-57.1%)和77.1%(95% CI:62.9%-91.4%)。中位随访时间为18.9个月(6.9-32.2个月)。中位 PFS 为 6.5 个月(95% CI:5.35-7.66)。PFS的多变量Cox回归分析表明,年龄、东部合作肿瘤学组表现状态(ECOG PS)评分、国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期和BRCA突变状态是影响PFS的独立因素(P<0.05)。此外,从未接受过PARP抑制剂治疗的BRCA突变患者的PFS明显长于既往接受过PARPi治疗的无BRCA突变患者(15.0个月 vs 6.0个月,P=0.029)。最常见的治疗相关不良反应是疲劳(85.7%)、血液毒性(85.7%)和高血压(74.3%)。无治疗相关死亡病例。结论安罗替尼联合尼拉帕利治疗铂耐药ROC患者具有良好的疗效和可耐受的安全性。
{"title":"[The efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with niraparib in treating patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer].","authors":"M Yang, J J Wang, S Q Deng, S S Liang, L Sun","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20231024-00224","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20231024-00224","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with niraparib in treating patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. <b>Methods:</b> Thirty-five patients with pathological confirmed platinum-resistant ovarian cancer who experienced progression after receiving at least two lines of standard treatment were eligible. All of them were treated with anlotinib combined with niraparib between September 2019 and October 2021. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The second endpoints included overall survival, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test, and influence factor analysis was performed using Cox proportional risk regression models. <b>Results:</b> The best overall response showed that partial response was observed in 14 patients, stable disease was noted within 13 patients, and progressive disease was found in 8 patients. Therefore, the ORR and DCR of these 35 patients were 40.0% (95% <i>CI</i>:22.9%-57.1%) and 77.1% (95% <i>CI</i>:62.9%-91.4%), respectively. The median follow-up duration was 18.9 months (6.9-32.2). The median PFS was 6.5 months (95% <i>CI</i>:5.35-7.66). Multivariate Cox regression analysis for PFS indicated that age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, and <i>BRCA</i> mutation status were independent factors influencing PFS (<i>P</i><0.05). Additionally, the PFS in patients with <i>BRCA</i> mutation who have never received PARP inhibitor treatment was significantly longer than that in patients without <i>BRCA</i> mutation who have been exposed to prior PARPi treatment (15.0 vs 6.0 month, <i>P</i>=0.029). The most common treatment-related adverse reactions were fatigue (85.7%), hematologic toxic (85.7%) and hypertension (74.3%). There were no treatment-related deaths. <b>Conclusion:</b> Anlotinib combined with niraparib shows a promising efficacy and tolerable safety in platinum-resistant ROC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":39868,"journal":{"name":"中华肿瘤杂志","volume":"46 7","pages":"696-702"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141735285","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Interpretation on the report of global cancer statistics 2022]. [2022 年全球癌症统计报告解读]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240416-00152
X Zhang, L Yang, S Liu, L L Cao, N Wang, H C Li, J F Ji

In April 2024, the World Health Organization/International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) published the global cancer statistics 2022 in the CA: Cancer Journal for Clinicians. This report focuses on the incidence and mortality of 36 cancers in 185 countries or territories worldwide, analyzing the differences of gender, geographic region, and the Human Development Index (HDI) level. It is estimated that in the year 2022, there were 19.96 million new cancer cases and 9.74 million cancer deaths worldwide. Lung cancer (2 480 301, 12.4%) was the most frequently diagnosed cancer in 2022, followed by female breast cancer (2 295 686, 11.5%), colorectal cancer (1 926 118, 9.6%), prostate cancer (1 466 680, 7.3%), and gastric cancer (968 350, 4.9%). Lung cancer (1 817 172, 18.7%) was also the leading cause of cancer death, followed by colorectal cancer (903 859, 9.3%), liver cancer (757 948, 7.8%), female breast cancer (665 684, 6.9%), and gastric cancer (659 853, 6.8%). With demographics-based predictions indicating that the number of new cases of cancer will reach over 35 million by 2050. The Beijing Office for Cancer Prevention and Control team has collated this report and briefly interpreted it in combination with the current situation of cancer incidence and mortality in China.

2024 年 4 月,世界卫生组织/国际癌症研究机构(IARC)在《CA:临床医师癌症杂志》上发布了 2022 年全球癌症统计数据。该报告重点介绍了全球 185 个国家或地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率,分析了性别、地理区域和人类发展指数(HDI)水平的差异。据估计,到 2022 年,全球将有 1996 万癌症新发病例和 974 万癌症死亡病例。肺癌(2 480 301 例,12.4%)是 2022 年最常见的癌症,其次是女性乳腺癌(2 295 686 例,11.5%)、结肠直肠癌(1 926 118 例,9.6%)、前列腺癌(1 466 680 例,7.3%)和胃癌(968 350 例,4.9%)。肺癌(1 817 172 例,18.7%)也是癌症死亡的主要原因,其次是结肠直肠癌(903 859 例,9.3%)、肝癌(757 948 例,7.8%)、女性乳腺癌(665 684 例,6.9%)和胃癌(659 853 例,6.8%)。根据人口预测,到 2050 年,新增癌症病例将超过 3500 万例。北京市肿瘤防治办公室课题组对该报告进行了整理,并结合我国癌症发病和死亡现状进行了简要解读。
{"title":"[Interpretation on the report of global cancer statistics 2022].","authors":"X Zhang, L Yang, S Liu, L L Cao, N Wang, H C Li, J F Ji","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240416-00152","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240416-00152","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In April 2024, the World Health Organization/International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) published the global cancer statistics 2022 in the <i>CA</i>: <i>Cancer Journal for Clinicians</i>. This report focuses on the incidence and mortality of 36 cancers in 185 countries or territories worldwide, analyzing the differences of gender, geographic region, and the Human Development Index (HDI) level. It is estimated that in the year 2022, there were 19.96 million new cancer cases and 9.74 million cancer deaths worldwide. Lung cancer (2 480 301, 12.4%) was the most frequently diagnosed cancer in 2022, followed by female breast cancer (2 295 686, 11.5%), colorectal cancer (1 926 118, 9.6%), prostate cancer (1 466 680, 7.3%), and gastric cancer (968 350, 4.9%). Lung cancer (1 817 172, 18.7%) was also the leading cause of cancer death, followed by colorectal cancer (903 859, 9.3%), liver cancer (757 948, 7.8%), female breast cancer (665 684, 6.9%), and gastric cancer (659 853, 6.8%). With demographics-based predictions indicating that the number of new cases of cancer will reach over 35 million by 2050. The Beijing Office for Cancer Prevention and Control team has collated this report and briefly interpreted it in combination with the current situation of cancer incidence and mortality in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":39868,"journal":{"name":"中华肿瘤杂志","volume":"46 7","pages":"710-721"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141735305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Comparison of the latest cancer statistics, cancer epidemic trends and determinants between China and the United States]. [中美两国最新癌症统计数据、癌症流行趋势及决定因素比较]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240208-00068
Y T Ji, S W Liu, Y M Zhang, H Y Duan, X M Liu, Z W Feng, J J Li, Z Y Lyu, Y B Huang

Objective: To provide supports for the cancer prevention and control strategies in China by comparing the disease burden, epidemic trends, 5-year relative survival rate and major determinants of common cancers between China and the United States. Methods: A descriptive secondary analysis was conducted using data extracted from the GLOBOCAN database, the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, Global Burden of disease 2019 database, and previous studies. The main indicators included the cases of malignant tumors in different sites, the cases of deaths, the age-standardized incidence (world standard incidence) and mortality (world standard mortality), the 5-year relative survival rate, and population attributable fraction (PAF). Results: In 2022, an estimated 4.825 million new cases and 2.574 million deaths of malignant neoplasms in China. The world standard incidence rate (201.6/100 000) in China was lower than that in the United States (367.0/100 000), and the world standard mortality rate (96.5/100 000) was higher than that in the United States (82.3/100 000). Lung cancer ranked first in the disease burden of malignant tumors in China, the new cases and deaths accounted for 22.0% and 28.5% of all malignant tumors, respectively. The top three malignant tumors in China were breast cancer (11.5%), prostate cancer (9.7%) and lung cancer (9.5%), which were also among the top five causes of death. However, the second to fifth leading causes of death from malignant tumors in China were digestive system tumors (liver cancer 12.3%, stomach cancer 10.1%, colorectal cancer 9.3%, and esophageal cancer 7.3%). From 2000 to 2018, the world standard incidence of malignant tumors showed an increasing trend and the world standard mortality of malignant tumors showed a decreasing trend in China, while the world standard incidence and mortality of malignant tumors in the United States showed a significant decreasing trend after 2000. The incidence of breast cancer, colorectal cancer and thyroid cancer increased rapidly in China, while the incidence and mortality of stomach cancer, liver cancer and esophageal cancer decreased, but they still had a heavy disease burden. From 2003 to 2015, the overall 5-year relative survival rate of malignant tumors increased from 30.9% to 40.5% in China. However, with the exception of esophageal cancer, the 5-year relative survival rates of other major malignant tumors were lower than those in the United States. In 2019, the PAF of malignant tumors death attributable to potential modifiable risk factors was 48.3% in China, which was similar to the United States (49.8%). Of these, smoking was the most important attributable risk factor, and the PAF was more than 30% both in China and the United States. In addition, about 18.8% of malignant tumors were caused by preventable chronic infections, such as hepatitis B virus and Helicobacter pylori, while less than 4% of malignant tumors in the Unite

目的:通过比较中美两国常见癌症的疾病负担、流行趋势、5 年相对生存率和主要决定因素,为中国的癌症防控策略提供支持。研究方法利用从 GLOBOCAN 数据库、监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库、2019 年全球疾病负担数据库和以往研究中提取的数据进行描述性二次分析。主要指标包括不同部位的恶性肿瘤病例数、死亡病例数、年龄标准化发病率(世界标准发病率)和死亡率(世界标准死亡率)、5年相对生存率和人口可归因分数(PAF)。结果:2022 年,中国恶性肿瘤新发病例约为 482.5 万例,死亡病例约为 257.4 万例。中国的世界标准发病率(201.6/10 万)低于美国(367.0/10 万),世界标准死亡率(96.5/10 万)高于美国(82.3/10 万)。肺癌在中国恶性肿瘤疾病负担中排名第一,新发病例和死亡病例分别占所有恶性肿瘤的22.0%和28.5%。中国排名前三位的恶性肿瘤分别是乳腺癌(11.5%)、前列腺癌(9.7%)和肺癌(9.5%),它们也是排名前五位的死因。然而,中国恶性肿瘤的第二至第五位死因是消化系统肿瘤(肝癌12.3%、胃癌10.1%、结直肠癌9.3%、食管癌7.3%)。从2000年到2018年,中国恶性肿瘤的世界标准发病率呈上升趋势,恶性肿瘤的世界标准死亡率呈下降趋势,而美国恶性肿瘤的世界标准发病率和死亡率在2000年后呈明显下降趋势。中国乳腺癌、结直肠癌和甲状腺癌的发病率上升较快,胃癌、肝癌和食管癌的发病率和死亡率有所下降,但疾病负担仍然较重。从2003年到2015年,中国恶性肿瘤总体5年相对生存率从30.9%上升到40.5%。但除食管癌外,其他主要恶性肿瘤的5年相对生存率均低于美国。2019年,中国可归因于潜在可改变风险因素的恶性肿瘤死亡PAF为48.3%,与美国(49.8%)相似。其中,吸烟是最重要的可归因风险因素,中国和美国的PAF均超过30%。此外,约18.8%的恶性肿瘤是由可预防的慢性感染引起的,如乙型肝炎病毒和幽门螺旋杆菌,而美国只有不到4%的恶性肿瘤是由感染引起的。结论:中国在恶性肿瘤的预防和治疗方面取得了巨大进步,但仍面临着严重的疾病负担。癌症谱正在从发展中国家向发达国家转变。我们应重视可改变因素,采取综合措施,科学防癌。
{"title":"[Comparison of the latest cancer statistics, cancer epidemic trends and determinants between China and the United States].","authors":"Y T Ji, S W Liu, Y M Zhang, H Y Duan, X M Liu, Z W Feng, J J Li, Z Y Lyu, Y B Huang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240208-00068","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240208-00068","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To provide supports for the cancer prevention and control strategies in China by comparing the disease burden, epidemic trends, 5-year relative survival rate and major determinants of common cancers between China and the United States. <b>Methods:</b> A descriptive secondary analysis was conducted using data extracted from the GLOBOCAN database, the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, Global Burden of disease 2019 database, and previous studies. The main indicators included the cases of malignant tumors in different sites, the cases of deaths, the age-standardized incidence (world standard incidence) and mortality (world standard mortality), the 5-year relative survival rate, and population attributable fraction (PAF). <b>Results:</b> In 2022, an estimated 4.825 million new cases and 2.574 million deaths of malignant neoplasms in China. The world standard incidence rate (201.6/100 000) in China was lower than that in the United States (367.0/100 000), and the world standard mortality rate (96.5/100 000) was higher than that in the United States (82.3/100 000). Lung cancer ranked first in the disease burden of malignant tumors in China, the new cases and deaths accounted for 22.0% and 28.5% of all malignant tumors, respectively. The top three malignant tumors in China were breast cancer (11.5%), prostate cancer (9.7%) and lung cancer (9.5%), which were also among the top five causes of death. However, the second to fifth leading causes of death from malignant tumors in China were digestive system tumors (liver cancer 12.3%, stomach cancer 10.1%, colorectal cancer 9.3%, and esophageal cancer 7.3%). From 2000 to 2018, the world standard incidence of malignant tumors showed an increasing trend and the world standard mortality of malignant tumors showed a decreasing trend in China, while the world standard incidence and mortality of malignant tumors in the United States showed a significant decreasing trend after 2000. The incidence of breast cancer, colorectal cancer and thyroid cancer increased rapidly in China, while the incidence and mortality of stomach cancer, liver cancer and esophageal cancer decreased, but they still had a heavy disease burden. From 2003 to 2015, the overall 5-year relative survival rate of malignant tumors increased from 30.9% to 40.5% in China. However, with the exception of esophageal cancer, the 5-year relative survival rates of other major malignant tumors were lower than those in the United States. In 2019, the PAF of malignant tumors death attributable to potential modifiable risk factors was 48.3% in China, which was similar to the United States (49.8%). Of these, smoking was the most important attributable risk factor, and the PAF was more than 30% both in China and the United States. In addition, about 18.8% of malignant tumors were caused by preventable chronic infections, such as hepatitis B virus and Helicobacter pylori, while less than 4% of malignant tumors in the Unite","PeriodicalId":39868,"journal":{"name":"中华肿瘤杂志","volume":"46 ","pages":"646-656"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141066197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
中华肿瘤杂志
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1