Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of ≥ 3% body weight loss at 6 months in male workers and verify the application possibility of assessment at 3 months after specific health guidance.
Methods: We recruited 5,031 Japanese male workers (aged 40-64 years) who had undergone health checkups and completed specific health guidance from 2008 to 2017. Participants were divided into three groups according to the percentage of weight reduction (≥ 3%, 0%-3%, ≤ 0%) after 6 months of health guidance. We compared the body weight, waist circumference, and blood pressure at 3- and 6-months with baseline data within and between groups. Similarly, in the medical examination of the next fiscal year (n = 2,889), body weight, waist circumference, blood pressure, triglyceride levels, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, plasma glucose levels, and the prevalence and improvement rates of metabolic syndrome (MetS) of specific health checkups were also compared. Furthermore, we calculated the weight reduction target after 3 months to arrive at a ≥ 3% weight reduction for 6 months. Based on the target, we investigated the prevalence and improvement rates of MetS in the next fiscal year.
Results: A total of 1,349 (26.8%) participants had a ≥ 3% weight reduction, 2,059 (40.9%) had a < 3% weight reduction, and 1,623 (32.3%) had no weight reduction. At the 6-month follow-up, waist circumference and blood pressure levels had increasingly improved with greater reductions in weight. The following year, body weight, waist circumference, blood pressure, triglyceride levels, HDL-C levels, and plasma glucose levels had improved in the ≥ 3% weight loss group, whereas plasma glucose levels had not improved in the 0-3% weight loss group. Additionally, only triglyceride levels and diastolic blood pressure had improved in the no weight reduction group. In the ≥ 3% weight loss group, the prevalence rate of MetS was the lowest (7.6%), and the improvement rate of MetS was the highest (70.7%). Furthermore, the weight reduction target after 3 months to arrive at a ≥ 3% body weight reduction at 6 months was 2.0% weight reduction. Those who reduced weight ≥ 2.0% had better prevalence and improvement rates of MetS than those who reduced weight < 2.0%.
Conclusions: Our findings indicated that the objective of losing ≥ 3% of body weight at 6 months in male workers after completing specific health guidance was effective and that assessment after 3 months based on setting a 2.0% weight reduction target was applicable.
{"title":"[Verification of the effects of three percent weight loss at 6 months and application possibility of assessment at 3 months after the specific health guidance for male workers].","authors":"Manami Nagahara, Yoshiyuki Higuchi, Junichi Akatsu, Naomichi Tani, Ryoko Yamamoto, Masanori Ohta","doi":"10.1539/sangyoeisei.2020-019-B","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1539/sangyoeisei.2020-019-B","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of ≥ 3% body weight loss at 6 months in male workers and verify the application possibility of assessment at 3 months after specific health guidance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 5,031 Japanese male workers (aged 40-64 years) who had undergone health checkups and completed specific health guidance from 2008 to 2017. Participants were divided into three groups according to the percentage of weight reduction (≥ 3%, 0%-3%, ≤ 0%) after 6 months of health guidance. We compared the body weight, waist circumference, and blood pressure at 3- and 6-months with baseline data within and between groups. Similarly, in the medical examination of the next fiscal year (n = 2,889), body weight, waist circumference, blood pressure, triglyceride levels, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, plasma glucose levels, and the prevalence and improvement rates of metabolic syndrome (MetS) of specific health checkups were also compared. Furthermore, we calculated the weight reduction target after 3 months to arrive at a ≥ 3% weight reduction for 6 months. Based on the target, we investigated the prevalence and improvement rates of MetS in the next fiscal year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,349 (26.8%) participants had a ≥ 3% weight reduction, 2,059 (40.9%) had a < 3% weight reduction, and 1,623 (32.3%) had no weight reduction. At the 6-month follow-up, waist circumference and blood pressure levels had increasingly improved with greater reductions in weight. The following year, body weight, waist circumference, blood pressure, triglyceride levels, HDL-C levels, and plasma glucose levels had improved in the ≥ 3% weight loss group, whereas plasma glucose levels had not improved in the 0-3% weight loss group. Additionally, only triglyceride levels and diastolic blood pressure had improved in the no weight reduction group. In the ≥ 3% weight loss group, the prevalence rate of MetS was the lowest (7.6%), and the improvement rate of MetS was the highest (70.7%). Furthermore, the weight reduction target after 3 months to arrive at a ≥ 3% body weight reduction at 6 months was 2.0% weight reduction. Those who reduced weight ≥ 2.0% had better prevalence and improvement rates of MetS than those who reduced weight < 2.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicated that the objective of losing ≥ 3% of body weight at 6 months in male workers after completing specific health guidance was effective and that assessment after 3 months based on setting a 2.0% weight reduction target was applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":40039,"journal":{"name":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","volume":"63 3","pages":"86-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38407680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-03-25Epub Date: 2020-08-12DOI: 10.1539/sangyoeisei.2020-030-A
Tatsushi Toyooka, Shigeki Koda
Objectives: Beryllium is primarily used in its metallic form, in alloys, or in beryllium oxide ceramics. Its physical and mechanical properties make it useful for many applications across a range of industries. Because beryllium is recognized as a sensitizing and carcinogenic agent, the management of occupational health for workers who may be occupationally exposed to beryllium has long been an important issue in the world. Under these circumstances, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) had published a rule in January 2017, to prevent the development of chronic beryllium disease and lung cancer. This rule strengthens the regulations governing the use of beryllium and its compounds. With the announcement of the OSHA rule in January 2017, the purpose of this study is to gain insight into the health problems and industrial hygiene associated with the use of beryllium and share the issues related to the management of occupational health for persons working with beryllium in Japan.
Methods: We collected information regarding the beryllium industry, beryllium exposure, beryllium-induced health disorders, OSHA rule of January 2017, and regulations for beryllium use in Japan. After reviewing them, we discussed the issues concerning occupational health management of workers exposed to beryllium in Japan.
Results: It has been reconfirmed that in recent years, the most serious health problem due to beryllium exposure is chronic beryllium disease caused by beryllium sensitization. Management of occupational health that emphasizes reduction of beryllium sensitization and early detection of beryllium-sensitized workers is important.
Conclusions: It was suggested that the following should be considered as the issues of management of occupational health of workers exposed to beryllium in Japan: (1) Collect epidemiologic data on health hazards from beryllium exposure in Japan. (2) Review the diagnostic items of special medical check-ups. (3) Review the definition of beryllium and its compounds in the Ordinance on Prevention of Hazards due to Specified Chemical Substances.
{"title":"[Management of occupational health for adverse health effects of beryllium and its compounds in workplaces - Recent trends and issues in Japan].","authors":"Tatsushi Toyooka, Shigeki Koda","doi":"10.1539/sangyoeisei.2020-030-A","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1539/sangyoeisei.2020-030-A","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Beryllium is primarily used in its metallic form, in alloys, or in beryllium oxide ceramics. Its physical and mechanical properties make it useful for many applications across a range of industries. Because beryllium is recognized as a sensitizing and carcinogenic agent, the management of occupational health for workers who may be occupationally exposed to beryllium has long been an important issue in the world. Under these circumstances, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) had published a rule in January 2017, to prevent the development of chronic beryllium disease and lung cancer. This rule strengthens the regulations governing the use of beryllium and its compounds. With the announcement of the OSHA rule in January 2017, the purpose of this study is to gain insight into the health problems and industrial hygiene associated with the use of beryllium and share the issues related to the management of occupational health for persons working with beryllium in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected information regarding the beryllium industry, beryllium exposure, beryllium-induced health disorders, OSHA rule of January 2017, and regulations for beryllium use in Japan. After reviewing them, we discussed the issues concerning occupational health management of workers exposed to beryllium in Japan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It has been reconfirmed that in recent years, the most serious health problem due to beryllium exposure is chronic beryllium disease caused by beryllium sensitization. Management of occupational health that emphasizes reduction of beryllium sensitization and early detection of beryllium-sensitized workers is important.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It was suggested that the following should be considered as the issues of management of occupational health of workers exposed to beryllium in Japan: (1) Collect epidemiologic data on health hazards from beryllium exposure in Japan. (2) Review the diagnostic items of special medical check-ups. (3) Review the definition of beryllium and its compounds in the Ordinance on Prevention of Hazards due to Specified Chemical Substances.</p>","PeriodicalId":40039,"journal":{"name":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","volume":"63 2","pages":"31-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38266800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: The current status of home blood pressure (HBP) measurement is unknown at a Japanese worksite. We aimed to calculate the proportion of individuals who periodically measured HBP and to explore the demographic and lifestyle characteristics of these workers.
Methods: The study included 4,664 employees aged 40-65 years who worked at a retail company and underwent health check-ups in 2018. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of participant's demographics and lifestyle characteristics and habits for HBP measurement by sex and medical treatment for hypertension. Periodic HBP measurement was defined as HBP measurements performed two times or more per month (opportunistic HBP measurement) among participants not being treated for hypertension, and daily measurement of HBP (everyday HBP measurement) among participants treated for hypertension.
Results: The percentages of opportunistic HBP measurement were 8.7% in males and 12.4% in females not being treated for hypertension. In both sexes, age (ORs per 1-year increment: 1.11 in males and 1.06 in females) and blood pressure (ORs of ≥ 140/90 mmHg: 7.42 in males and 4.71 in females compared with < 130/80 mmHg) were positively associated with opportunistic HBP measurement. Females treated for dyslipidemia (OR: 1.77), who had a self-described fast walking speed (OR: 1.49), and who exercised habitually (OR: 1.79) had significantly high ORs for opportunistic HBP measurement. Females who frequently consumed snacks after dinner had significantly lower ORs (0.65) than those who did not. The percentages of workers who did everyday HBP measurement were 21.6% in males and 25.5% in females treated for hypertension. Males treated for diabetes (OR: 0.23) had significantly lower OR than those who did not. Females treated for dyslipidemia (OR was 0.53), who had uncontrolled hypertension (OR: 0.58), consumed alcohol (OR: 0.60), and frequently ate within two hours before bed (OR: 0.54) had significantly lower ORs. Females who lived alone had significantly higher ORs (2.43) than those who did not.
Conclusion: Approximately 10% of individuals not treated for hypertension periodically measured HBP. Age and blood pressure in males and females, and healthy lifestyles in females, were associated with having opportunistic HBP measurement. Approximately 25% of individuals treated for hypertension measured HBP every day. Individuals treated for dyslipidemia or diabetes and females with unhealthy lifestyle and uncontrolled hypertension were less likely to measure HBP every day.
{"title":"[Current status of home blood pressure measurement and relevant demographics and lifestyle characteristics of individuals with periodic measurement: a cross-sectional study in a worksite population].","authors":"Yukako Tatsumi, Azusa Shima, Atsuko Kawamura, Ayumi Morino, Yuichiro Kawatsu, Takayoshi Ohkubo","doi":"10.1539/sangyoeisei.2020-016-B","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1539/sangyoeisei.2020-016-B","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The current status of home blood pressure (HBP) measurement is unknown at a Japanese worksite. We aimed to calculate the proportion of individuals who periodically measured HBP and to explore the demographic and lifestyle characteristics of these workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 4,664 employees aged 40-65 years who worked at a retail company and underwent health check-ups in 2018. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of participant's demographics and lifestyle characteristics and habits for HBP measurement by sex and medical treatment for hypertension. Periodic HBP measurement was defined as HBP measurements performed two times or more per month (opportunistic HBP measurement) among participants not being treated for hypertension, and daily measurement of HBP (everyday HBP measurement) among participants treated for hypertension.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentages of opportunistic HBP measurement were 8.7% in males and 12.4% in females not being treated for hypertension. In both sexes, age (ORs per 1-year increment: 1.11 in males and 1.06 in females) and blood pressure (ORs of ≥ 140/90 mmHg: 7.42 in males and 4.71 in females compared with < 130/80 mmHg) were positively associated with opportunistic HBP measurement. Females treated for dyslipidemia (OR: 1.77), who had a self-described fast walking speed (OR: 1.49), and who exercised habitually (OR: 1.79) had significantly high ORs for opportunistic HBP measurement. Females who frequently consumed snacks after dinner had significantly lower ORs (0.65) than those who did not. The percentages of workers who did everyday HBP measurement were 21.6% in males and 25.5% in females treated for hypertension. Males treated for diabetes (OR: 0.23) had significantly lower OR than those who did not. Females treated for dyslipidemia (OR was 0.53), who had uncontrolled hypertension (OR: 0.58), consumed alcohol (OR: 0.60), and frequently ate within two hours before bed (OR: 0.54) had significantly lower ORs. Females who lived alone had significantly higher ORs (2.43) than those who did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Approximately 10% of individuals not treated for hypertension periodically measured HBP. Age and blood pressure in males and females, and healthy lifestyles in females, were associated with having opportunistic HBP measurement. Approximately 25% of individuals treated for hypertension measured HBP every day. Individuals treated for dyslipidemia or diabetes and females with unhealthy lifestyle and uncontrolled hypertension were less likely to measure HBP every day.</p>","PeriodicalId":40039,"journal":{"name":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","volume":"63 2","pages":"43-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38267400","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: In Japan, companies are required to implement a "stress check program" to prevent mental health problems in workers. To identify "high-stress" workers, the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (BJSQ) is recommended. According to the stress check program manual issued by the government, high-stress can be defined using two criteria, either the "sum method" (simply summing the scores for each scales) or the "score converted method" (using converted scores according to the conversion table for each scales). In this study, we examined the differences in results found using these two criteria on "stress check program" data.
Methods: We used data of 71,422 workers in 117 companies and organizations who conducted stress checks in 2016. The prevalence of high-stress was calculated by applying the two criteria simultaneously, and the chi-square test was used to compare the proportion of workers with high-stress. We subsequently divided participants into the four following groups and calculated the proportion of each group: group A was defined as having high-stress by both criteria; group B, only by the sum method; group C, only by the score converted method; and group D, not defined as high-stress by either criterion. We compared the average values of stress response among four groups using the Kruskal-Wallis test, and further compared the average values between group B and group C using the Bonferroni method.
Results: The average age of participants was 43.7 ± 11.1, and 66.8% were males. The proportion of those defined as having high-stress were 11.7% using the sum method and 13.2% using the score converted method; the proportion of high-stress workers was thus significantly higher when using the score converted method (p <.001). Physical stress response was higher in group B; however, lack of vigor, irritation, fatigue, and depression were higher in group C (p <.01).
Conclusions: Compared to the sum method, 1.5% more high-stress workers were observed using the converted method, and this result was similar for individual and employment-related factors. Furthermore, workers were more likely to be judged as having "high-stress" when the score of the physical stress response was higher in the sum method. Hereafter, it is important to consider which criteria are applied when discussing proportions of high-stress. Further research is needed to examine which criteria will predict health disorders.
{"title":"[Comparison of the two methods of defining high-stress on the Japanese Stress Check Program].","authors":"Aoi Kataoka, Hiroyuki Kikuchi, Yuko Odagiri, Yumiko Ohya, Yutaka Nakanishi, Teruichi Shimomitsu, Shigeru Inoue","doi":"10.1539/sangyoeisei.2020-017-B","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1539/sangyoeisei.2020-017-B","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In Japan, companies are required to implement a \"stress check program\" to prevent mental health problems in workers. To identify \"high-stress\" workers, the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (BJSQ) is recommended. According to the stress check program manual issued by the government, high-stress can be defined using two criteria, either the \"sum method\" (simply summing the scores for each scales) or the \"score converted method\" (using converted scores according to the conversion table for each scales). In this study, we examined the differences in results found using these two criteria on \"stress check program\" data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data of 71,422 workers in 117 companies and organizations who conducted stress checks in 2016. The prevalence of high-stress was calculated by applying the two criteria simultaneously, and the chi-square test was used to compare the proportion of workers with high-stress. We subsequently divided participants into the four following groups and calculated the proportion of each group: group A was defined as having high-stress by both criteria; group B, only by the sum method; group C, only by the score converted method; and group D, not defined as high-stress by either criterion. We compared the average values of stress response among four groups using the Kruskal-Wallis test, and further compared the average values between group B and group C using the Bonferroni method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of participants was 43.7 ± 11.1, and 66.8% were males. The proportion of those defined as having high-stress were 11.7% using the sum method and 13.2% using the score converted method; the proportion of high-stress workers was thus significantly higher when using the score converted method (p <.001). Physical stress response was higher in group B; however, lack of vigor, irritation, fatigue, and depression were higher in group C (p <.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to the sum method, 1.5% more high-stress workers were observed using the converted method, and this result was similar for individual and employment-related factors. Furthermore, workers were more likely to be judged as having \"high-stress\" when the score of the physical stress response was higher in the sum method. Hereafter, it is important to consider which criteria are applied when discussing proportions of high-stress. Further research is needed to examine which criteria will predict health disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":40039,"journal":{"name":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","volume":"63 2","pages":"53-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38300190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"[Accommodation process for disabled workers: Role of occupational health professionals in Japan].","authors":"Hiroshi Tsuji, Tamami Ozawa, Emi Hayashi, Junko Tamaki","doi":"10.1539/sangyoeisei.2019-034-W","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1539/sangyoeisei.2019-034-W","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":40039,"journal":{"name":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","volume":"63 1","pages":"21-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38139557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-25Epub Date: 2020-07-09DOI: 10.1539/sangyoeisei.2020-012-E
Rina Minohara, Yuichi Kobayashi, Yuko Furuya, Chihiro Kinugawa, Haruna Hirosato, Seichiro Tateishi, Seiji Watanabe, Koji Mori
Objectives: In Japan, the population is aging and there is a declining birth rate. It is an important occupational health issue to support the balance between illness treatment (including nursing care, childcare, etc.) and work. Many patients require mental and financial support to help them with their work-treatment balance. In 2016, the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare provided guidelines for supporting employee's work-treatment balance, and in 2018, "Consulting Fee" was approved as an insured medical treatment when clinic doctors supported their patients for continuing to work. The request for the consulting fee requires that the clinician and the occupational physician exchange information on the support necessary for the patient to continue working. Generally, occupational physicians obtain medical information from clinicians to give advice on a worker's employment considerations. However, we do not know what kind of workplace information clinicians hope to know when treating their patients. Therefore, we conducted this survey to clarify how occupational physicians could provide useful information to clinicians.
Methods: We asked approximately 1,500 occupational physicians from the Occupational Health Subcommittee of the Japan Society for Occupational Health to provide us with a letter sent to their clinician to assist workers. From the collected letters, the structural parts of the letters (titles, greetings, acknowledgments, etc.) were removed. We defined a section as a contextual unit that does not impair the meaning. The prepared sections underwent qualitative inductive analysis using the content analysis method of "Berelson, B."
Results: A total of 103 cases and 178 documents from 42 people were included in the analysis. Extracting descriptions that could be interpreted as providing information, including descriptions related to treatment, employment, and living environment, and opinions and suggestions from occupational physicians resulted in 596 sections. As a result of the qualitative and inductive classification, the information was classified into three large categories that consisted of information provision, opinions of occupational physicians, and information handling, five middle and eighteen small classifications. In addition, some good practices that were considered significant to clinicians were illustrated.
Conclusions: We analyzed and categorized the information present in the letters sent by occupational physicians to clinicians. The letter does not need to contain all the information in the category table. However, it is important that it should have the necessary and sufficient information considering the case in question. We believe that this category table will aid occupational physicians in writing letters to clinicians.
{"title":"[Qualitative analysis of provided information and advice from occupational physicians to attending clinical physicians in supporting an employee's work-treatment balance].","authors":"Rina Minohara, Yuichi Kobayashi, Yuko Furuya, Chihiro Kinugawa, Haruna Hirosato, Seichiro Tateishi, Seiji Watanabe, Koji Mori","doi":"10.1539/sangyoeisei.2020-012-E","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1539/sangyoeisei.2020-012-E","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In Japan, the population is aging and there is a declining birth rate. It is an important occupational health issue to support the balance between illness treatment (including nursing care, childcare, etc.) and work. Many patients require mental and financial support to help them with their work-treatment balance. In 2016, the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare provided guidelines for supporting employee's work-treatment balance, and in 2018, \"Consulting Fee\" was approved as an insured medical treatment when clinic doctors supported their patients for continuing to work. The request for the consulting fee requires that the clinician and the occupational physician exchange information on the support necessary for the patient to continue working. Generally, occupational physicians obtain medical information from clinicians to give advice on a worker's employment considerations. However, we do not know what kind of workplace information clinicians hope to know when treating their patients. Therefore, we conducted this survey to clarify how occupational physicians could provide useful information to clinicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We asked approximately 1,500 occupational physicians from the Occupational Health Subcommittee of the Japan Society for Occupational Health to provide us with a letter sent to their clinician to assist workers. From the collected letters, the structural parts of the letters (titles, greetings, acknowledgments, etc.) were removed. We defined a section as a contextual unit that does not impair the meaning. The prepared sections underwent qualitative inductive analysis using the content analysis method of \"Berelson, B.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 103 cases and 178 documents from 42 people were included in the analysis. Extracting descriptions that could be interpreted as providing information, including descriptions related to treatment, employment, and living environment, and opinions and suggestions from occupational physicians resulted in 596 sections. As a result of the qualitative and inductive classification, the information was classified into three large categories that consisted of information provision, opinions of occupational physicians, and information handling, five middle and eighteen small classifications. In addition, some good practices that were considered significant to clinicians were illustrated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We analyzed and categorized the information present in the letters sent by occupational physicians to clinicians. The letter does not need to contain all the information in the category table. However, it is important that it should have the necessary and sufficient information considering the case in question. We believe that this category table will aid occupational physicians in writing letters to clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":40039,"journal":{"name":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","volume":"63 1","pages":"6-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38139558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01DOI: 10.1539/sangyoeisei.63-2-e1
Hironobu Abiko
{"title":"[Erratum: Dependence of the extraction efficiency of activated carbon adsorbents for work envi-ronment measurement on the concentration of organic solvents [SANGYO EISEIGAKU ZASSHI 2020; 62(5): 192-197]].","authors":"Hironobu Abiko","doi":"10.1539/sangyoeisei.63-2-e1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1539/sangyoeisei.63-2-e1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":40039,"journal":{"name":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","volume":"63 2","pages":"e1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25525795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}