Perspectives in health information management / AHIMA, American Health Information Management Association最新文献

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) increases patient morbidity and mortality. In value-based care, the documented and coded diagnoses during hospitalization influences an encounter's relative weight (RW), including severity of illness (SOI), and risk of mortality, which ultimately determines reimbursement for care. The impact of a secondary diagnosis of AKI on RW in pediatric patients has not been evaluated.

Methods: A single-center, retrospective observational study was conducted over six months. The institutional coding database was queried for secondary diagnoses signifying AKI. The RW for each case was determined with and without an AKI secondary diagnosis. Patients were further stratified by their SOI score to evaluate change in RW and SOI.

Results: Over a six-month period, 372 patients had a secondary AKI diagnosis, with a mean RW 2.14 decreasing to a mean RW 1.83 without an AKI diagnosis (p = 2.2e-16). When stratified by SOI, one patient had SOI 1 with RW change -0.286; six patients had SOI 2 with mean RW change -0.0669; 189 patients had SOI 3 with mean RW change -1.862 (p=2.23E-16); and 176 patients had SOI 4 with mean RW change -0.452 (p=9.46E-14), when the AKI secondary diagnosis was removed.

Conclusions: Significant negative changes in RW were observed when AKI was removed, suggesting diagnostic omission may result in inaccurately lesser representation of patient medical complexity and severity of illness upon hospitalization coding, which may lower reimbursement.

The healthcare sector continues to be the industry suffering one of the highest costs of a data security breach. Healthcare lags behind other industries in cybersecurity preparedness despite advances in cybersecurity technologies. Technical safeguards to protect electronic health records must be combined with human behavioral interventions to promote a robust cybersecurity plan. Using data from the United States Department of Health and Human Services, we conducted an exploratory analysis of past data breaches in healthcare organizations from January 2015 to December 2020 to explore the extent to which human elements played a role in data security incidents. We found that a vast majority of health records were compromised due to poor human security. The mean number of records affected by a breach due to unintentional insider threats is more than twice that of breaches caused by malicious intent such as external cyberattacks and theft. Our findings also indicate that, on average, more patient records are compromised from falling for a phishing scam than any other reason. We argue that proper cybersecurity contingency plans in healthcare must include human behavioral interventions that go beyond technical controls.

This case study describes use of health information technology for enhanced team-based care and care coordination between primary care providers and infectious disease specialists for curing and eventually eliminating hepatitis C in West Virginia. This program, the West Virginia Hepatitis Academic Mentoring Partnership, aims to improve outcomes of West Virginians with chronic hepatitis C infection by training and supporting primary care providers to screen, diagnose, evaluate, treat, cure, and follow patients in the community rather than referring them to distant specialists with long wait times. This initiative supports health equity by increasing access to quality care in severely under-resourced rural areas. Primary care providers engage with hepatitis C experts in a web-based training and mentoring process, combined with informatics training in use of a customized Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCAP) platform for secure data tracking and bidirectional communication. This use of an informatics platform available to all partners supports shared decision-making between primary care providers and specialists, fostering a primary care learning network for improved hepatitis C care in West Virginia.

Community pharmacies provide the convenience and ease of administrating vaccinations outside traditional settings. Vaccinations are health initiatives that protect communities and improve health outcomes in all populations. Despite their accessibility and supporting clinical data, various influential factors contribute to the current suboptimal rates of vaccine administration. Given the common barriers to vaccine administration, this research narrows down to address a specific barrier and attempts to implement a method that focuses on improving vaccine rates in community pharmacies. This research is a case study that utilizes the Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control (DMAIC) model of Lean Six Sigma and aims to use this quality improvement process to identify, measure, analyze, and implement a training program to facilitate pharmacists in high-quality vaccine recommendations to promote higher rates of pneumococcal vaccinations in community settings.

To examine differences in rural and urban respondents' use of and access to patient portals in the United States, this study used the 2019 National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 5, Cycle 3. A cross-sectional secondary data analysis utilizing jackknife weighting procedures was used to generalize the findings to be nationally representative. Despite similar rates of providers maintaining an electronic medical record system, adjusted analyses found that rural respondents had lower odds of being offered access to a patient portal by their healthcare provider (OR: 0.60; 95 percent CI: 0.39-0.91) and accessing their patient portals in the last 12 months (OR: 0.62; 95 percent CI: 0.43-0.91) when compared to their urban counterparts. Additional research is needed to determine effective strategies for overcoming geographic and structural barriers to adoption of this technology by rural residents.

Objectives: Learn how substance use disorder (SUD) treatment organizations view and respond to changes in confidentiality and disclosure law following adoption of CARES Act Sec. 3221 and prior to promulgation of revised implementing regulations.

Methods: Online survey followed by informal interviews. Representatives of SUD organizations reported their degree of awareness of Sec. 3221 provisions and their organizations' views on amendments to disclosure practices; current and future changes of organizational policies; difficulties anticipated in implementing new rules; and preferences for resources.

Results: Forty informant surveys on 30 organizations completed. Participants (62.5 percent) indicated being somewhat knowledgeable about Sec. 3221. Evenly divided positive and concerned views on Sec. 3221 reflect tension between preserving confidentiality of patient records and improving coordination of care. Most (76.7 percent) reported organizational discussions on Sec. 3221. Some (30 percent) identified changes to make in near future. Over a third expected few or no barriers to implementing changes to privacy and disclosure practices, while most (64.7 percent) expected hindrances including complexity and tensions in the law, staff education, cost, technological adjustments, and changes in the ways SUD organizations interact with external organizations and individuals. To overcome barriers noted, participants expressed desire (66.7 percent) for teaching tools such as webinars and templates to follow.

Conclusions: SUD treatment organizations began thinking of and planning for proposed changes well before expected implementation of Sec. 3221. Their concerns reflected practicalities of implementation, determining content of law, and wondering about the extent to which it solves problems (improving coordination of care among various providers) or endangered other goals (protecting confidentiality of SUD patient records).

Introduction: Recently, several technologies have been developed for being used in the field of geriatric emergency medicine. As a large number of elderly patients visit emergency departments, the use of health information technology in this department can help to improve patient care and control the outcome of diseases. The present study aimed to identify opportunities for using various health information technologies for elderly care in the emergency department.

Methods: This qualitative study was conducted in 2020. The participants included geriatricians, geriatric nurses, emergency medicine specialists, and nurses who worked in the emergency department. In total, 33 semi-structured interviews were conducted, and data were analyzed by using framework analysis method and MAXQDA software.

Results: The findings of the qualitative study included four main themes, nine subthemes, and 20 categories. The main themes were the common process of elderly care in the emergency departments, data required for elderly care in the emergency departments, the elderly treatment team, and current information technologies used in the emergency departments for elderly care. Overall, the results showed that there was no specific workflow for elderly care in the emergency departments; the great workload of this department prevents the clinicians to conduct cognitive and functional assessments; geriatricians were not involved in the care process; and none of the current information systems were designed specifically for elderly patients. It seems that using specific heath information technology for elderly care in the emergency department can help to overcome current challenges.

Conclusion: Identifying opportunities for using health information technologies for geriatric patients in the emergency department can lead to better use of financial, physical, and human resources, and improve staff performance. These systems can be designed and used for different purposes such as reducing work load, readmissions, and hospitalization. Improving access to data and better collaboration between different specialties are other benefits of using these systems. However, more research is required to evaluate the effectiveness of technology in this area.