Ajeng Pramesthy H.K, I. W. Yasa, Fendi Setyawan, Yusuf Adiwibowo, Ferdiansyah Putra Manggala
{"title":"Dampak Alih Fungsi Lahan Sawah Dilindungi (LSD) terhadap Ketahanan Pangan Pedesaan di Kabupaten Jember","authors":"Ajeng Pramesthy H.K, I. W. Yasa, Fendi Setyawan, Yusuf Adiwibowo, Ferdiansyah Putra Manggala","doi":"10.21107/il.v4i2.23103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21107/il.v4i2.23103","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":407285,"journal":{"name":"INICIO LEGIS","volume":"9 33","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139237160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN KENDARAAN BERMOTOR (Studi Kasus di Polres Gresik)","authors":"Nadia Nuzhuli Rahmadani, Yana Indawati","doi":"10.21107/il.v4i2.21786","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21107/il.v4i2.21786","url":null,"abstract":"Kejahatan","PeriodicalId":407285,"journal":{"name":"INICIO LEGIS","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139261107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Perlindungan dan Pemberdayaan Hukum Terhadap Ekonomi Kreatif Sektor Pariwisata di Kabupaten Bangkalan","authors":"Siswanto, Rhido Jusmadi","doi":"10.21107/il.v4i2.18943","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21107/il.v4i2.18943","url":null,"abstract":"studi lapangan","PeriodicalId":407285,"journal":{"name":"INICIO LEGIS","volume":"2 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139275846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"“ANALISIS TES WAWASAN KEBANGSAAN SEBAGAI SALAH SATU SYARAT UNTUK MENJADI APARATUR SIPIL NEGARA DI KABUPATEN BANGKALAN”","authors":"Ahmad Farrij Mauludy, Wahjoe Poernomo Soeprapto","doi":"10.21107/il.v4i2.16566","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21107/il.v4i2.16566","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":407285,"journal":{"name":"INICIO LEGIS","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139290526","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Protection of personal data in Indonesia is part of Human Rights and is a constitutional mandate as regulated in Article 28G paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia. Personal data protection is part of personal protection in the Constitution of Indonesia. The importance of protecting personal data departs from the concept of privacy rights attached to a person (individual). Personal data in Indonesia itself is given legal protection which is regulated in-laws and regulations, namely the Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Information of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2016 concerning Protection of Personal Data in Electronic Systems. However, the protection of personal data is limited to the protection of personal data of electronic systems. While personal data itself contains electronic personal data and non-electronic personal data. There is no comprehensive regulation on the protection of personal
{"title":"PENGATURAN PERLINDUNGAN DATA PRIBADI NON-ELEKTRONIK DALAM PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN DI INDONESIA","authors":"Choirul Ghofur, Nunuk Nuswardani","doi":"10.21107/il.v4i2.15692","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21107/il.v4i2.15692","url":null,"abstract":"Protection of personal data in Indonesia is part of Human Rights and is a constitutional mandate as regulated in Article 28G paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia. Personal data protection is part of personal protection in the Constitution of Indonesia. The importance of protecting personal data departs from the concept of privacy rights attached to a person (individual). Personal data in Indonesia itself is given legal protection which is regulated in-laws and regulations, namely the Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Information of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2016 concerning Protection of Personal Data in Electronic Systems. However, the protection of personal data is limited to the protection of personal data of electronic systems. While personal data itself contains electronic personal data and non-electronic personal data. There is no comprehensive regulation on the protection of personal","PeriodicalId":407285,"journal":{"name":"INICIO LEGIS","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139293532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Problematika Rokok Ilegal Tanpa Pita Cukai Dalam Perspektif Law of demand dan Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 2007 Tentang Cukai","authors":"Warit Aziz, I. Cahyani","doi":"10.21107/il.v4i1.19169","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21107/il.v4i1.19169","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":407285,"journal":{"name":"INICIO LEGIS","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130033718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji dan menganalisis urgensi integrasi zona integritas dan pelayanan publik di Indonesia. Pelayanan publik yang baik merupakan harapan setiap masyarakat. Reformasi birokrasi menjadi langkah yang harus ditempuh untuk melaksanakan pembenahan pada sistem penyelenggaraan pemerintahan yang efektif, efisien serta lebih baik, sehingga memaksimalkan pelayanan kepada masyarakat. Jenis Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Adapun pendekatan penelitian ini dilakukan dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan yang digabungkan dengan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian ini yaitu pengaturan zona integritas di Indonesia mengalami beberapa perubahan, Zona Integritas diatur dalam Permenpan RB Nomor 90 Tahun 2021 tentang Pembangunan dan Evaluasi Zona Integritas Menuju Wilayah Bebas Dari Korupsi Dan Wilayah Birokrasi Bersih Dan Melayani Di Instansi Pemerintah. Urgensi Integrasi zona integritas
{"title":"Urgensi Integrasi Zona Integritas dan Pelayanan Publik","authors":"Syahrul Husein Al-Farizi, Nunuk Nuswardani","doi":"10.21107/il.v4i1.19928","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21107/il.v4i1.19928","url":null,"abstract":"Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji dan menganalisis urgensi integrasi zona integritas dan pelayanan publik di Indonesia. Pelayanan publik yang baik merupakan harapan setiap masyarakat. Reformasi birokrasi menjadi langkah yang harus ditempuh untuk melaksanakan pembenahan pada sistem penyelenggaraan pemerintahan yang efektif, efisien serta lebih baik, sehingga memaksimalkan pelayanan kepada masyarakat. Jenis Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Adapun pendekatan penelitian ini dilakukan dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan yang digabungkan dengan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian ini yaitu pengaturan zona integritas di Indonesia mengalami beberapa perubahan, Zona Integritas diatur dalam Permenpan RB Nomor 90 Tahun 2021 tentang Pembangunan dan Evaluasi Zona Integritas Menuju Wilayah Bebas Dari Korupsi Dan Wilayah Birokrasi Bersih Dan Melayani Di Instansi Pemerintah. Urgensi Integrasi zona integritas","PeriodicalId":407285,"journal":{"name":"INICIO LEGIS","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122491018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
ABSTRAK Notaris adalah pejabat umum yang berwenang dalam pembuatan akta otentik. Sebagai Warga Negara Indonesia, Notaris juga diperlukan untuk membayar Pajak Pertambahan Nilai (PPN) atas jasa yang diberikannya. Namun terdapat kekaburan hukum dan ketidakpastian mengenai kewajiban notaris tersebut dan kategori notaris yang diklasifikasikan sebagai Pengusaha Kena Pajak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisa terkait kewajiban notaris dalam pengenaan PPN. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual. Data diperoleh melalui pengumpulan bahan hukum primer untuk dianalisa dengan studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Notaris sebagai pejabat umum yang memberikan jasa hukum termasuk ke dalam kategori jasa yang dikenakan pajak pertambahan nilai. Notaris dalam menjalankan kewajiban tersebut harus terlebih dahulu melakukan pengukuhan sebagai Pengusaha Kena Pajak untuk dapat melaksanakan pengenaan Pajak Pertambahan Nilai terhadap jasa yang telah diberikan. Pengenaan pajak tersebut dilakukan dengan prosedur pencatatan dan pelaporan
{"title":"KEPASTIAN HUKUM KEWAJIBAN PENGENAAN PAJAK PERTAMBAHAN NILAI TERHADAP JASA NOTARIS SELAKU PENGUSAHA KENA PAJAK","authors":"Ajeng Pramesthy H.K","doi":"10.21107/il.v4i1.20213","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21107/il.v4i1.20213","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRAK Notaris adalah pejabat umum yang berwenang dalam pembuatan akta otentik. Sebagai Warga Negara Indonesia, Notaris juga diperlukan untuk membayar Pajak Pertambahan Nilai (PPN) atas jasa yang diberikannya. Namun terdapat kekaburan hukum dan ketidakpastian mengenai kewajiban notaris tersebut dan kategori notaris yang diklasifikasikan sebagai Pengusaha Kena Pajak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisa terkait kewajiban notaris dalam pengenaan PPN. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual. Data diperoleh melalui pengumpulan bahan hukum primer untuk dianalisa dengan studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Notaris sebagai pejabat umum yang memberikan jasa hukum termasuk ke dalam kategori jasa yang dikenakan pajak pertambahan nilai. Notaris dalam menjalankan kewajiban tersebut harus terlebih dahulu melakukan pengukuhan sebagai Pengusaha Kena Pajak untuk dapat melaksanakan pengenaan Pajak Pertambahan Nilai terhadap jasa yang telah diberikan. Pengenaan pajak tersebut dilakukan dengan prosedur pencatatan dan pelaporan","PeriodicalId":407285,"journal":{"name":"INICIO LEGIS","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125357026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In Decision Number 261/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Gpr, Decision Number 262/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Gpr, and Decision Number 8/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Gpr, where the perpetrators are business actors who have committed criminal acts due to trade in goods and/or services that are designated as goods and/or services that are prohibited from being traded and violate Article 110 of Law Number 7 of 2014 concerning Trade. Of the three decisions, the sentencing is different, especially the size of the criminal sanction and the problem is what is the basis for the judge's sentencing in the three decisions resulting in a different sentence. This aims to find out the basis of punishment used by judges in deciding a case related to business actors trading Government goods, so that evaluation can be carried out in the future. So the approach used is the case approach by examining cases related to the issues at hand which have become court decisions. The results of the study show that of the three decisions there is disparity in criminal decisions because each panel of judges has differences in proving and fulfilling each element in the article based on the legal facts revealed in the trial. In addition, the Panel of Judges also used the evidence presented at the trial, especially the amount of maize seeds aided by the Government traded by business actors as a basis for sentencing. Then the Panel of Judges in the three decisions also used a non-juridical basis for sentencing based on the objectives of the sentencing and the aggravating and mitigating circumstances of the business actors. Therefore, this has led to differences in the punishment of business actors who trade corn seeds with the help of the Government.
{"title":"Disparitas Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Usaha Yang Memperdagangkan Benih Jagung Bantuan Pemerintah (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 261/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Gpr, Putusan Nomor 262/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Gpr, Putusan Nomor 8/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Gpr)","authors":"Anggi Syahbani, Eny Suastuti","doi":"10.21107/il.v4i1.18872","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21107/il.v4i1.18872","url":null,"abstract":"In Decision Number 261/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Gpr, Decision Number 262/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Gpr, and Decision Number 8/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Gpr, where the perpetrators are business actors who have committed criminal acts due to trade in goods and/or services that are designated as goods and/or services that are prohibited from being traded and violate Article 110 of Law Number 7 of 2014 concerning Trade. Of the three decisions, the sentencing is different, especially the size of the criminal sanction and the problem is what is the basis for the judge's sentencing in the three decisions resulting in a different sentence. This aims to find out the basis of punishment used by judges in deciding a case related to business actors trading Government goods, so that evaluation can be carried out in the future. So the approach used is the case approach by examining cases related to the issues at hand which have become court decisions. The results of the study show that of the three decisions there is disparity in criminal decisions because each panel of judges has differences in proving and fulfilling each element in the article based on the legal facts revealed in the trial. In addition, the Panel of Judges also used the evidence presented at the trial, especially the amount of maize seeds aided by the Government traded by business actors as a basis for sentencing. Then the Panel of Judges in the three decisions also used a non-juridical basis for sentencing based on the objectives of the sentencing and the aggravating and mitigating circumstances of the business actors. Therefore, this has led to differences in the punishment of business actors who trade corn seeds with the help of the Government.","PeriodicalId":407285,"journal":{"name":"INICIO LEGIS","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114929833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：