首页 > 最新文献

Legal Information Management最新文献

英文 中文
Sarah A Sutherland, Legal Data and Information in Practice: How Data and the Law Interact (Routledge, 2022). 170 pages, 11 b/w illustrations. Hardback: ISBN 9780367649906; Paperback: ISBN: 9780367649883; ebook: ISBN 9781003127307. 萨拉·A·萨瑟兰:《实践中的法律数据和信息:数据与法律如何相互作用》(劳特利奇出版社,2022)。170页,11个黑白插图。精装本:ISBN 9780367649906;平装本:ISBN: 9780367649883;电子书:ISBN 9781003127307。
IF 0.4 Q4 LAW Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI: 10.1017/s1472669622000184
Jas Breslin
Figuring out how data in the legal sector can be understood and used to create new opportunities for the future is a challenge to legal information professionals the world over; which is why books like Legal Data and Information in Practice, by Sarah A. Sutherland, can be so useful. Sutherland, who is the President and CEO at the Canadian Legal Information Institute (CANLII), writes regularly on legal data internationally and is therefore well placed to tackle the subject of accessibility and exploitation of legal data in a variety of organisational settings. This book, which is sub-titled How Data and the Law Interact, is broken down into nine chapters, with chapter one setting the scene, outlining why a better understanding of data is needed, and providing some examples of the benefits this brings: such as improving the profitability of a legal practice, developing insights into how decisions are made, and understanding how different legal systems produce differing data – while also uncovering sources of legal data. Chapter two takes a more detailed look at where legal data can be found and identifies issues with accessing such data. Then the technical aspects of data formats are described in chapter three, where challenges specific to legal data are highlighted, including a succinct consideration of why understanding formatting issues will significantly increase the success of any data driven project. The fourth chapter gives the reader an overview of the various data analysis techniques available, including statistical analysis, machine learning, natural language processing, plus other methods, while chapter five gives more practical information, building on the previous chapter and helping the reader to formulate an approach to interpreting and analysing legal data. Chapter six discusses in more detail the challenges faced when using legal data, noting that these are often exacerbated by the fact that data has not always been created with the intention that it will actually be used as data (for example, case law or legislation). Also, the contextual ambiguity of legal data needs to be considered, and therefore it can be hard to create reliable analysis using traditional methods of analysis. The last three chapters look towards the future of the field of data analysis. An overview of artificial intelligence (AI) is provided in chapter seven, with a discussion on the promise and challenges automating routine data tasks will entail. Law and politics are covered in chapter eight, and in the final chapter Sutherland sets out some probable, plausible, and possible futures which take into account not only the adoption of technology within the legal discipline but also its acceptance, while also considering how concerns within the wider society might play out. Legal Data and Information in Practice provides the perfect introduction to legal data and the associated key concepts
弄清楚如何理解和利用法律部门的数据为未来创造新的机会,对世界各地的法律信息专业人员来说是一项挑战;这就是为什么像萨拉·A·萨瑟兰的《法律数据与实践中的信息》这样的书会如此有用。萨瑟兰是加拿大法律信息研究所(CANLII)的总裁兼首席执行官,他定期在国际上撰写法律数据,因此能够在各种组织环境中解决法律数据的可访问性和利用问题。这本书的副标题为《数据与法律如何互动》,分为九章,第一章为场景,概述了为什么需要更好地理解数据,并提供了一些好处的例子:例如提高法律实践的盈利能力,深入了解决策方式,了解不同的法律制度如何产生不同的数据,同时也揭示法律数据的来源。第二章更详细地介绍了在哪里可以找到法律数据,并确定了访问这些数据的问题。然后,第三章描述了数据格式的技术方面,其中强调了法律数据特有的挑战,包括简要考虑为什么理解格式问题将大大提高任何数据驱动项目的成功率。第四章向读者概述了现有的各种数据分析技术,包括统计分析、机器学习、自然语言处理以及其他方法,而第五章在前一章的基础上提供了更多实用信息,帮助读者制定解释和分析法律数据的方法。第六章更详细地讨论了使用法律数据时面临的挑战,指出数据的创建并不总是为了将其实际用作数据(例如,判例法或立法),这一事实往往会加剧这些挑战。此外,需要考虑法律数据的上下文模糊性,因此使用传统的分析方法很难创建可靠的分析。最后三章展望了数据分析领域的未来。第七章概述了人工智能,并讨论了自动化日常数据任务所带来的前景和挑战。第八章涵盖了法律和政治,在最后一章中,萨瑟兰列出了一些可能、合理和可能的未来,这些未来不仅考虑到法律学科中对技术的采用,还考虑到技术的接受,同时还考虑到更广泛社会中的担忧可能会如何发展。法律数据和实践中的信息为法律数据和相关关键概念提供了完美的介绍
{"title":"Sarah A Sutherland, Legal Data and Information in Practice: How Data and the Law Interact (Routledge, 2022). 170 pages, 11 b/w illustrations. Hardback: ISBN 9780367649906; Paperback: ISBN: 9780367649883; ebook: ISBN 9781003127307.","authors":"Jas Breslin","doi":"10.1017/s1472669622000184","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1472669622000184","url":null,"abstract":"Figuring out how data in the legal sector can be understood and used to create new opportunities for the future is a challenge to legal information professionals the world over; which is why books like Legal Data and Information in Practice, by Sarah A. Sutherland, can be so useful. Sutherland, who is the President and CEO at the Canadian Legal Information Institute (CANLII), writes regularly on legal data internationally and is therefore well placed to tackle the subject of accessibility and exploitation of legal data in a variety of organisational settings. This book, which is sub-titled How Data and the Law Interact, is broken down into nine chapters, with chapter one setting the scene, outlining why a better understanding of data is needed, and providing some examples of the benefits this brings: such as improving the profitability of a legal practice, developing insights into how decisions are made, and understanding how different legal systems produce differing data – while also uncovering sources of legal data. Chapter two takes a more detailed look at where legal data can be found and identifies issues with accessing such data. Then the technical aspects of data formats are described in chapter three, where challenges specific to legal data are highlighted, including a succinct consideration of why understanding formatting issues will significantly increase the success of any data driven project. The fourth chapter gives the reader an overview of the various data analysis techniques available, including statistical analysis, machine learning, natural language processing, plus other methods, while chapter five gives more practical information, building on the previous chapter and helping the reader to formulate an approach to interpreting and analysing legal data. Chapter six discusses in more detail the challenges faced when using legal data, noting that these are often exacerbated by the fact that data has not always been created with the intention that it will actually be used as data (for example, case law or legislation). Also, the contextual ambiguity of legal data needs to be considered, and therefore it can be hard to create reliable analysis using traditional methods of analysis. The last three chapters look towards the future of the field of data analysis. An overview of artificial intelligence (AI) is provided in chapter seven, with a discussion on the promise and challenges automating routine data tasks will entail. Law and politics are covered in chapter eight, and in the final chapter Sutherland sets out some probable, plausible, and possible futures which take into account not only the adoption of technology within the legal discipline but also its acceptance, while also considering how concerns within the wider society might play out. Legal Data and Information in Practice provides the perfect introduction to legal data and the associated key concepts","PeriodicalId":42162,"journal":{"name":"Legal Information Management","volume":"22 1","pages":"106 - 107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42057318","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Citation Metrics for Legal Information Retrieval: Scholars and Practitioners Intertwined? 法律信息检索的引文计量:学者和从业者交织在一起?
IF 0.4 Q4 LAW Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI: 10.1017/S1472669622000160
G. Wiggers, S. Verberne, G. Zwenne
Abstract This paper is written by Gineke Wiggers, Suzan Verberne and Gerrit-Jan Zwenne and examines citations in legal documents in the context of bibliometric-enhanced legal information retrieval. It is suggested that users of legal information retrieval systems wish to see both scholarly and non-scholarly information, and legal information retrieval systems are developed to be used by both scholarly and non-scholarly users. Since the use of citations in building arguments plays an important role in the legal domain, bibliometric information (such as citations) is an instrument to enhance legal information retrieval systems. This paper examines, through literature and data analysis, whether a bibliometric-enhanced ranking for legal information retrieval should consider both scholarly and nonscholarly publications, and whether this ranking could serve both user groups, or whether a distinction needs to be made. Their literature analysis suggests that for legal documents, there is no strict separation between scholarly and non-scholarly documents. There is no clear mark by which the two groups can be separated, and in as far as a distinction can be made, literature shows that both scholars and practitioners (non-scholars) use both types. They perform a data analysis to analyze this finding for legal information retrieval in practice, using citation and usage data from a legal search engine in the Netherlands. They first create a method to classify legal documents as either scholarly or non-scholarly based on criteria found in the literature. We then semi- automatically analyze a set of seed documents and register by what (type of) documents they are cited. This resulted in a set of 52 cited (seed) documents and 3086 citing documents. Based on the affiliation of users of the search engine, we analyzed the relation between user group and document type. The authors’ data analysis confirms the literature analysis and shows much crosscitations between scholarly and non-scholarly documents. In addition, we find that scholarly users often open non-scholarly documents and vice versa. Our results suggest that for use in legal information retrieval systems citations in legal documents measure part of a broad scope of impact, or relevance, on the entire legal field. This means that for bibliometric-enhanced ranking in legal information retrieval, both scholarly and non-scholarly documents should be considered. The disregard by both scholarly and non-scholarly users of the distinction between scholarly and non-scholarly publications also suggests that the affiliation of the user is not likely a suitable factor to differentiate rankings on. The data in combination with literature suggests that a differentiation on user intent might be more suitable.
本文由Gineke Wiggers, Suzan Verberne和Gerrit-Jan Zwenne撰写,研究了文献计量学增强法律信息检索背景下法律文件中的引文。建议法律信息检索系统的用户希望看到学术和非学术信息,法律信息检索系统的开发是为了学术和非学术用户使用。由于在建立论点时引用的使用在法律领域中起着重要作用,文献计量信息(如引用)是加强法律信息检索系统的一种工具。本文通过文献和数据分析,检验了一个文献计量学增强的法律信息检索排名是否应该考虑学术和非学术出版物,以及这个排名是否可以服务于两个用户群体,或者是否需要做出区分。他们的文献分析表明,对于法律文件来说,学术和非学术文件并没有严格的区分。没有明确的标志可以区分这两类人,就可以做出区分而言,文献表明学者和从业者(非学者)都使用这两种类型。他们使用来自荷兰法律搜索引擎的引文和用法数据,对这一发现进行数据分析,以便在实践中检索法律信息。他们首先创建了一种方法,根据文献中发现的标准将法律文件分为学术性或非学术性。然后,我们半自动地分析一组种子文档,并根据它们被引用的文档(类型)注册。这产生了一组52个被引用(种子)文档和3086个被引用文档。基于搜索引擎用户的隶属关系,分析了用户组与文档类型之间的关系。作者的数据分析证实了文献分析,并显示了学术和非学术文献之间的许多交叉。此外,我们发现学术用户经常打开非学术文档,反之亦然。我们的研究结果表明,在法律信息检索系统中,法律文件中的引文衡量了对整个法律领域的广泛影响或相关性的一部分。这意味着,在法律信息检索中,文献计量学增强的排名应该同时考虑学术和非学术文献。学术和非学术用户都无视学术和非学术出版物之间的区别,这也表明用户的隶属关系不太可能是区分排名的合适因素。数据结合文献表明,区分用户意图可能更合适。
{"title":"Citation Metrics for Legal Information Retrieval: Scholars and Practitioners Intertwined?","authors":"G. Wiggers, S. Verberne, G. Zwenne","doi":"10.1017/S1472669622000160","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1472669622000160","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper is written by Gineke Wiggers, Suzan Verberne and Gerrit-Jan Zwenne and examines citations in legal documents in the context of bibliometric-enhanced legal information retrieval. It is suggested that users of legal information retrieval systems wish to see both scholarly and non-scholarly information, and legal information retrieval systems are developed to be used by both scholarly and non-scholarly users. Since the use of citations in building arguments plays an important role in the legal domain, bibliometric information (such as citations) is an instrument to enhance legal information retrieval systems. This paper examines, through literature and data analysis, whether a bibliometric-enhanced ranking for legal information retrieval should consider both scholarly and nonscholarly publications, and whether this ranking could serve both user groups, or whether a distinction needs to be made. Their literature analysis suggests that for legal documents, there is no strict separation between scholarly and non-scholarly documents. There is no clear mark by which the two groups can be separated, and in as far as a distinction can be made, literature shows that both scholars and practitioners (non-scholars) use both types. They perform a data analysis to analyze this finding for legal information retrieval in practice, using citation and usage data from a legal search engine in the Netherlands. They first create a method to classify legal documents as either scholarly or non-scholarly based on criteria found in the literature. We then semi- automatically analyze a set of seed documents and register by what (type of) documents they are cited. This resulted in a set of 52 cited (seed) documents and 3086 citing documents. Based on the affiliation of users of the search engine, we analyzed the relation between user group and document type. The authors’ data analysis confirms the literature analysis and shows much crosscitations between scholarly and non-scholarly documents. In addition, we find that scholarly users often open non-scholarly documents and vice versa. Our results suggest that for use in legal information retrieval systems citations in legal documents measure part of a broad scope of impact, or relevance, on the entire legal field. This means that for bibliometric-enhanced ranking in legal information retrieval, both scholarly and non-scholarly documents should be considered. The disregard by both scholarly and non-scholarly users of the distinction between scholarly and non-scholarly publications also suggests that the affiliation of the user is not likely a suitable factor to differentiate rankings on. The data in combination with literature suggests that a differentiation on user intent might be more suitable.","PeriodicalId":42162,"journal":{"name":"Legal Information Management","volume":"22 1","pages":"88 - 103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49044912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
‘A Library is a Growing Organism’: Redefining Artificial Intelligence and the Role of the Information Professional in the Corporate Legal World “图书馆是一个成长的有机体”:重新定义人工智能和信息专业人员在企业法律界的角色
IF 0.4 Q4 LAW Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI: 10.1017/S1472669622000159
Jake Hearn
Abstract This article, written by Jake Hearn, seeks to define and reevaluate artificial intelligence (AI) in the context of the corporate legal world. The article explores some of the opportunities on offer to information professionals to ensure that the profession continues to grow within the economic, cultural and professional context it is situated.
本文由Jake Hearn撰写,试图在企业法律世界的背景下定义和重新评估人工智能(AI)。本文探讨了为信息专业人员提供的一些机会,以确保该专业在其所处的经济、文化和专业背景下继续发展。
{"title":"‘A Library is a Growing Organism’: Redefining Artificial Intelligence and the Role of the Information Professional in the Corporate Legal World","authors":"Jake Hearn","doi":"10.1017/S1472669622000159","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1472669622000159","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article, written by Jake Hearn, seeks to define and reevaluate artificial intelligence (AI) in the context of the corporate legal world. The article explores some of the opportunities on offer to information professionals to ensure that the profession continues to grow within the economic, cultural and professional context it is situated.","PeriodicalId":42162,"journal":{"name":"Legal Information Management","volume":"22 1","pages":"81 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46753763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
LIM volume 22 issue 2 Cover and Back matter LIM第22卷第2期封面和封底
IF 0.4 Q4 LAW Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI: 10.1017/s1472669622000214
{"title":"LIM volume 22 issue 2 Cover and Back matter","authors":"","doi":"10.1017/s1472669622000214","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1472669622000214","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42162,"journal":{"name":"Legal Information Management","volume":" ","pages":"b1 - b3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48921676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial 编辑
IF 0.4 Q4 LAW Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI: 10.1017/s1472669622000135
David K. Wills
{"title":"Editorial","authors":"David K. Wills","doi":"10.1017/s1472669622000135","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1472669622000135","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42162,"journal":{"name":"Legal Information Management","volume":"22 1","pages":"71 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43052791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Hire Purpose: Skills for Interviewers 招聘目的:面试官的技能
IF 0.4 Q4 LAW Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1017/s147266962200007x
Jas Breslin
Abstract There is plenty of advice for those about to take an interview for a job, but what about if you're sitting on the other side of the table? Here Jas Breslin, Research & Information Services Manager at top city law firm Charles Russell Speechlys, guides us though the key things to keep in mind when you're the one asking the questions.
摘要对于那些即将参加面试的人来说,有很多建议,但如果你坐在桌子的另一边呢?在这里,顶级城市律师事务所Charles Russell Speechlys的研究与信息服务经理Jas Breslin指导我们,当你提出问题时,要记住关键的事情。
{"title":"A Hire Purpose: Skills for Interviewers","authors":"Jas Breslin","doi":"10.1017/s147266962200007x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s147266962200007x","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract There is plenty of advice for those about to take an interview for a job, but what about if you're sitting on the other side of the table? Here Jas Breslin, Research & Information Services Manager at top city law firm Charles Russell Speechlys, guides us though the key things to keep in mind when you're the one asking the questions.","PeriodicalId":42162,"journal":{"name":"Legal Information Management","volume":"22 1","pages":"41 - 44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46684160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial 社论
IF 0.4 Q4 LAW Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1017/s1472669622000020
David K. Wills
[...]Channarong Intahchomphoo and Christian Tschirhart, who have written for the journal in the recent past, have authored an article entitled ‘The Evolution of Data and Freedom of Expression and Hate Speech Concerns with Artificial Intelligence’. Since the previous issue of the journal one of our Board members, Joanne Whalley, stepped down;she had made an important contribution to the work of Board as one of our proof-readers for a number of the recent LIM issues. [...]my thanks go to our colleagues at Cambridge University Press - Craig Baxter, Production Editor for Journals and Jamie Davidson, Editor, HSS Journals.
[…]Channarong Intahchomphoo和Christian Tschirhart最近为该杂志撰稿,他们撰写了一篇题为《数据的进化与人工智能的言论自由和仇恨言论问题》的文章。自从上一期杂志以来,我们的董事会成员之一Joanne Whalley辞职了;她作为我们最近几期LIM的校样读者之一,为董事会的工作做出了重要贡献。[…]我要感谢我们在剑桥大学出版社的同事——期刊制作编辑Craig Baxter和HSS期刊编辑Jamie Davidson。
{"title":"Editorial","authors":"David K. Wills","doi":"10.1017/s1472669622000020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1472669622000020","url":null,"abstract":"[...]Channarong Intahchomphoo and Christian Tschirhart, who have written for the journal in the recent past, have authored an article entitled ‘The Evolution of Data and Freedom of Expression and Hate Speech Concerns with Artificial Intelligence’. Since the previous issue of the journal one of our Board members, Joanne Whalley, stepped down;she had made an important contribution to the work of Board as one of our proof-readers for a number of the recent LIM issues. [...]my thanks go to our colleagues at Cambridge University Press - Craig Baxter, Production Editor for Journals and Jamie Davidson, Editor, HSS Journals.","PeriodicalId":42162,"journal":{"name":"Legal Information Management","volume":"22 1","pages":"1 - 1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49300305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Recruiting for Success: Best Practices for Job Interviews 成功招聘:求职面试的最佳实践
IF 0.4 Q4 LAW Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1017/s1472669622000068
Victoria North
Abstract This article is aimed at anyone who is responsible for recruiting staff and discusses how to prepare for a successful job interview. It is written in the context of a competitive recruitment market caused by the increased workload in law firms since the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic. The author, Victoria North, is a senior information professional with many years of experience of building successful teams. She shares some of the best practices she has learnt during her career.
这篇文章是针对任何负责招聘员工的人,讨论如何为成功的工作面试做准备。这是在新型冠状病毒感染症(Covid-19)疫情爆发后,律师事务所的工作量增加,招聘市场竞争激烈的情况下编写的。作者维多利亚·诺斯(Victoria North)是一位资深信息专业人士,拥有多年构建成功团队的经验。她分享了她在职业生涯中学到的一些最佳实践。
{"title":"Recruiting for Success: Best Practices for Job Interviews","authors":"Victoria North","doi":"10.1017/s1472669622000068","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1472669622000068","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article is aimed at anyone who is responsible for recruiting staff and discusses how to prepare for a successful job interview. It is written in the context of a competitive recruitment market caused by the increased workload in law firms since the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic. The author, Victoria North, is a senior information professional with many years of experience of building successful teams. She shares some of the best practices she has learnt during her career.","PeriodicalId":42162,"journal":{"name":"Legal Information Management","volume":"22 1","pages":"38 - 41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48751120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploration of Domain Relevance by Legal Professionals in Information Retrieval Systems 信息检索系统中法律专业人员领域相关性的探索
IF 0.4 Q4 LAW Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1017/S1472669622000093
G. Wiggers, S. Verberne, G. Zwenne, Wouter van Loon
Abstract This paper, written by Gineke Wiggers, Suzan Verberne, Gerrit-Jan Zwenne and Wouter Van Loon, addresses the concept of ‘relevance’ in relation to legal information retrieval (IR). They investigate whether the conceptual framework of relevance in legal IR, as described by Van Opijnen and Santos in their paper published in 2017, can be confirmed in practice.1 The research is conducted with a user questionnaire in which users of a legal IR system had to choose which of two results they would like to see ranked higher for a query and were asked to provide a reason for their choice. To avoid questions with an obvious answer and extract as much information as possible about the reasoning process, the search results were chosen to differ on relevance factors from the literature, where one result scores high on one factor, and the other on another factor. The questionnaire had eleven pairs of search results. A total of 43 legal professionals participated consisting of 14 legal information specialists, 6 legal scholars and 23 legal practitioners. The results confirmed the existence of domain relevance as described in the theoretical framework by Van Opijnen and Santos as published in 2017.2 Based on the factors mentioned by the respondents, the authors of this paper concluded that document type, recency, level of depth, legal hierarchy, authority, usability and whether a document is annotated are factors of domain relevance that are largely independent of the task context. The authors also investigated whether different sub-groups of users of legal IR systems (legal information specialists who are searching for others, legal scholars and also for legal practitioners) differ in terms of the factors they consider in judging the relevance of legal documents outside of a task context. Using a PERMANOVA there was found to be no significant difference in the factors reported by these groups. At this moment there is no reason to treat these sub-groups differently in legal IR systems.
本文由Gineke Wiggers, Suzan Verberne, Gerrit-Jan Zwenne和Wouter Van Loon撰写,讨论了与法律信息检索(IR)相关的“相关性”概念。他们调查了Van Opijnen和Santos在2017年发表的论文中所描述的法律IR中相关性的概念框架是否可以在实践中得到证实这项研究是通过一份用户问卷进行的,在问卷中,法律IR系统的用户必须从两个结果中选择他们希望看到的排名更高的结果,并被要求提供他们选择的原因。为了避免有明显答案的问题,并尽可能多地提取有关推理过程的信息,选择的搜索结果与文献的相关因素不同,其中一个结果在一个因素上得分高,而另一个在另一个因素上得分高。问卷有11对搜索结果。共有43名法律专业人员参加,其中法律信息专家14人,法律学者6人,法律从业人员23人。研究结果证实了Van Opijnen和Santos在2017年发表的理论框架中所描述的领域相关性的存在。基于受访者提到的因素,本文作者得出结论,文档类型、最近性、深度水平、法律层次、权威、可用性和文档是否注释是领域相关性的因素,这些因素在很大程度上独立于任务上下文。作者还调查了法律信息检索系统的不同用户群体(寻找他人的法律信息专家、法律学者和法律从业人员)在判断任务背景之外的法律文件的相关性时所考虑的因素是否不同。使用PERMANOVA,发现这些组报告的因素没有显著差异。目前,没有理由在法律IR制度中区别对待这些小群体。
{"title":"Exploration of Domain Relevance by Legal Professionals in Information Retrieval Systems","authors":"G. Wiggers, S. Verberne, G. Zwenne, Wouter van Loon","doi":"10.1017/S1472669622000093","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1472669622000093","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper, written by Gineke Wiggers, Suzan Verberne, Gerrit-Jan Zwenne and Wouter Van Loon, addresses the concept of ‘relevance’ in relation to legal information retrieval (IR). They investigate whether the conceptual framework of relevance in legal IR, as described by Van Opijnen and Santos in their paper published in 2017, can be confirmed in practice.1 The research is conducted with a user questionnaire in which users of a legal IR system had to choose which of two results they would like to see ranked higher for a query and were asked to provide a reason for their choice. To avoid questions with an obvious answer and extract as much information as possible about the reasoning process, the search results were chosen to differ on relevance factors from the literature, where one result scores high on one factor, and the other on another factor. The questionnaire had eleven pairs of search results. A total of 43 legal professionals participated consisting of 14 legal information specialists, 6 legal scholars and 23 legal practitioners. The results confirmed the existence of domain relevance as described in the theoretical framework by Van Opijnen and Santos as published in 2017.2 Based on the factors mentioned by the respondents, the authors of this paper concluded that document type, recency, level of depth, legal hierarchy, authority, usability and whether a document is annotated are factors of domain relevance that are largely independent of the task context. The authors also investigated whether different sub-groups of users of legal IR systems (legal information specialists who are searching for others, legal scholars and also for legal practitioners) differ in terms of the factors they consider in judging the relevance of legal documents outside of a task context. Using a PERMANOVA there was found to be no significant difference in the factors reported by these groups. At this moment there is no reason to treat these sub-groups differently in legal IR systems.","PeriodicalId":42162,"journal":{"name":"Legal Information Management","volume":"22 1","pages":"49 - 67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"56957344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
BIALL ‘State of the Nation’ Survey December 2021 BIALL“国家现状”调查2021年12月
IF 0.4 Q4 LAW Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1017/s1472669622000044
Biall ‘State
{"title":"BIALL ‘State of the Nation’ Survey December 2021","authors":"Biall ‘State","doi":"10.1017/s1472669622000044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1472669622000044","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42162,"journal":{"name":"Legal Information Management","volume":"22 1","pages":"4 - 25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41365789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Legal Information Management
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1