{"title":"A ‘full Bhaur’ attack on abuse? Misuse of trusts and mistake considered in Bhaur v Equity First Trustees (Nevis) Limited & Ors","authors":"T. Graham, David Russell, Tom McPhail","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttab113","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttab113","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43396,"journal":{"name":"Trusts & Trustees","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45370442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Bartlett duty revisited—an imperfect fusion of trust and company law and practice","authors":"T. Graham, David Russell AM QC","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttab102","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttab102","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43396,"journal":{"name":"Trusts & Trustees","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42589192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A body of case law has now developed in relation to the well-known jurisdiction of common law courts to intervene in voluntary dispositions where they are made on the basis of a serious mistake. But what about the situation where some consideration has been given for the disposition? Does the existence of significant, or any, consideration deny the equitable remedy?
{"title":"Smith and Philpott v Athol Administration Limited and ors, the Milewood Purpose Trust (2021), CHP2020/93","authors":"Jonathan Rimmer","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttab079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttab079","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 A body of case law has now developed in relation to the well-known jurisdiction of common law courts to intervene in voluntary dispositions where they are made on the basis of a serious mistake. But what about the situation where some consideration has been given for the disposition? Does the existence of significant, or any, consideration deny the equitable remedy?","PeriodicalId":43396,"journal":{"name":"Trusts & Trustees","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46511972","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：