Current Emergency and Hospital Medicine Reports最新文献

Purpose of review: With the onset of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, in-person human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing is no longer easily accessible. Therefore, alternative testing technologies must be considered and implemented on a large scale to continue prevention efforts. This review seeks to describe the benefits of utilizing at-home HIV testing technologies, traditionally deemed an alternative form of testing.

Recent findings: Utilizing at-home testing technology during the COVID-19 pandemic overcomes novel and previously identified barriers to HIV testing.

Summary: Ensuring access to HIV testing is imperative to long-term prevention goals. With the Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) initiative in the USA targeting achievement by 2030, obstacles to HIV testing must be addressed to ensure its success. Implementing alternative testing technology more broadly allows for continued prevention efforts for HIV in light of COVID era restrictions.

Purpose of review: Ultraportable handheld ultrasound (HHU) devices are being rapidly adopted by emergency medicine (EM) physicians. Though knowledge of the breadth of their utility and functionality is still limited compared to cart-based systems, these machines are becoming more common due to ease-of-use, extreme affordability, and improving technology.

Recent findings: Images obtained with HHU are comparable to those obtained with traditional machines but create unique issues regarding billing and data management. HHU devices are increasingly used successfully to augment the education of practitioners-in-training, by emergency physicians in austere environments, and in the burgeoning fields of "tele-ultrasound" and augmented reality scanning.

Summary: This review seeks to describe the current state of use of HHU devices in the emergency department (ED) including device overview, institutional concerns, unique areas of use, recent literature since their adoption into clinical EM, and their future potential.

Purpose of review: This study aims to provide a concise delirium review for practicing emergency medicine providers using the Assess, Diagnose, Evaluate, Prevent, and Treat (ADEPT) framework.

Recent findings: Delirium is a form of acute brain dysfunction that results in significant mortality and morbidity for older emergency department (ED) patients. Delirium is frequently missed by healthcare providers, but monitoring for this syndrome using brief delirium assessments may improve recognition. Once delirium is diagnosed, emergency medicine providers' primary goal is to perform a comprehensive history and physical examination to uncover the underlying etiology for delirium. This includes obtaining history from a collateral historian and obtaining an accurate medication history. If posssible, emergency physicians (EPs) should treat the medical etiology that precipitated the delirium. If agitated, non-pharmacologic interventions such that minimize the use of tethers are preferred. Pharmacologic agents such as antipsychotic medications should be used as a last resort.

Summary: Delirium is a common geriatric emergency and requires the EP to assess, diagnose, evaluate, prevent, and treat. Delirium is a key geriatric syndrome that geriatric ED providers should routinely screen for. A strong emphasis is on the widespread use of delirium screening, followed by prevention and treatment efforts.

Purpose of review: The purpose of this review was to highlight the current recommendations, data, and limitations for methods of cardiovascular screening in athletes.

Recent findings: While the history and physical (H&P) alone remains the cornerstone for preparticipation cardiovascular screening (PPCS) in athletes, the advent of modern electrocardiographic (ECG) screening criteria has drastically increased sensitivity and decreased false positive rates for screening. Advanced imaging techniques remain an important component of secondary testing after an athlete has an abnormal initial screening exam, however, the use of imaging for universal screening has not been rigorously tested to date. Current disqualification guidelines have now begun to emphasize shared decision making between the provider and athlete in situations of clinical equipoise.

Summary: All major medical and sporting societies recommend PPCS using a focused medical history and physical examination for all competitive athletes, but there remains controversy about the role of ECG and advanced imaging in PPCS. Future research should focus on the creation of a randomized trial that is powered for mortality that can truly assess the utility of PPCS in athletes.