首页 > 最新文献

Pythagoras最新文献

英文 中文
Mathematics education for relevance, responsiveness, and viability in Africa within the Fourth Industrial Revolution era 第四次工业革命时代非洲数学教育的相关性、响应性和可行性
Q3 Mathematics Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI: 10.4102/pythagoras.v44i1.767
Rose Maoto
{"title":"Mathematics education for relevance, responsiveness, and viability in Africa within the Fourth Industrial Revolution era","authors":"Rose Maoto","doi":"10.4102/pythagoras.v44i1.767","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v44i1.767","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43521,"journal":{"name":"Pythagoras","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135584200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ticks and crosses in primary mathematics assessments: What purpose do they serve? 小学数学评估中的勾号和叉号:它们的目的是什么?
Q3 Mathematics Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI: 10.4102/pythagoras.v44i1.647
Brian Chihodzi, Willy Mwakapenda, Beatrice Ngulube
Ticks and crosses (TCs) are a common aspect of teachers’ classroom practice in relation to assessment in many learning areas including mathematics. Putting TCs in learners’ written work is a strategy of feedback. Even though these TCs are frequently used in different types of mathematics assessments, there is limited research in relation to what they actually stand for and what functions they are designed for and especially what purpose they eventually serve in practice. This article emerged from a broader study that aimed at exploring classroom formative assessment practices of Grades 4–6 mathematics teachers, a learning goals and documentary analysis. Since this study was qualitative in nature, we used qualitative, non-probability sampling to recruit respondents according to pre-selected criteria relevant to our research questions. The study participants were 43 qualified and experienced Intermediate Phase mathematics teachers and 95 Grades 4–6 learners from the Tshwane South district, where a phenomenon of low achievement was of great concern. We engaged in document analysis of all the 95 learners’ mathematics workbooks. Questionnaires were administered to the 43 teachers. We report on an analysis of teachers’ assessment practices of Grades 4–6 learners’ mathematics work. We narrate the extent of the use of TCs among teachers from selected schools in Tshwane South district in Gauteng, South Africa. Our analysis shows that while there is prevalent use of TCs among teachers, there are critical gaps in relation to knowledge of TCs in assessing mathematics. We present a qualitative and quantitative data analysis to illustrate how these were used in connection with assessment of learners’ mathematics work linked to the concepts of numerical, geometric, and graphical relationships. We use our analysis of the vignettes to explore and argue that teachers use TCs without adequate understanding of what these actually mean in relation to assessment broadly and assessment intended at collecting and clarifying goals for mathematical learning specifically. Despite teachers having mathematical qualifications and a repertoire of experience for teaching, the majority of teachers grappled with understanding mathematical concepts as evidence in how they marked learners’ mathematics work. The study also found that teachers’ understandings of assessment of mathematics were diverse and largely inconsistent with the formal definitions of mathematics.Contribution: This study indicated that there are critical gaps in relation to knowledge of TCs in assessing mathematics. A clear-cut marking policy will guide teachers to provide effective marking using TCs.
在包括数学在内的许多学习领域,打叉(TCs)是教师课堂实践中与评估有关的一个常见方面。在学习者的书面作业中加入tc是一种反馈策略。尽管这些tc经常用于不同类型的数学评估,但关于它们实际代表什么,它们被设计用于什么功能,特别是它们最终在实践中服务于什么目的的研究有限。本文源于一项更广泛的研究,旨在探索4-6年级数学教师的课堂形成性评估实践,学习目标和文献分析。由于本研究本质上是定性的,我们使用定性的非概率抽样,根据与我们的研究问题相关的预先选择的标准来招募受访者。研究参与者是43名合格且经验丰富的中级数学教师和95名4-6年级的学生,他们来自茨瓦内南区,那里的低成绩现象非常受关注。我们对95名学习者的数学练习册进行了文献分析。对43名教师进行问卷调查。我们报告了教师对4-6年级学生数学作业的评估实践分析。我们叙述了在南非豪登省茨瓦内南区选定学校的教师中使用tc的程度。我们的分析表明,虽然教师普遍使用技术支持,但在评估数学时,技术支持知识方面存在严重差距。我们提出了一个定性和定量的数据分析,以说明这些数据是如何用于与学生的数学工作与数字、几何和图形关系的概念相联系的评估。我们通过对这些小插曲的分析来探讨和论证教师在使用tc时,没有充分理解这些tc与广泛的评估和旨在收集和明确数学学习目标的评估的实际含义。尽管教师具有数学资格和丰富的教学经验,但大多数教师都努力将理解数学概念作为他们如何标记学习者数学工作的证据。研究还发现,教师对数学评价的理解是多种多样的,并且在很大程度上与数学的正式定义不一致。贡献:本研究显示,在评估数学时,学生对教学技巧知识的了解存在严重差距。明确的评分政策将指导教师使用tc进行有效的评分。
{"title":"Ticks and crosses in primary mathematics assessments: What purpose do they serve?","authors":"Brian Chihodzi, Willy Mwakapenda, Beatrice Ngulube","doi":"10.4102/pythagoras.v44i1.647","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v44i1.647","url":null,"abstract":"Ticks and crosses (TCs) are a common aspect of teachers’ classroom practice in relation to assessment in many learning areas including mathematics. Putting TCs in learners’ written work is a strategy of feedback. Even though these TCs are frequently used in different types of mathematics assessments, there is limited research in relation to what they actually stand for and what functions they are designed for and especially what purpose they eventually serve in practice. This article emerged from a broader study that aimed at exploring classroom formative assessment practices of Grades 4–6 mathematics teachers, a learning goals and documentary analysis. Since this study was qualitative in nature, we used qualitative, non-probability sampling to recruit respondents according to pre-selected criteria relevant to our research questions. The study participants were 43 qualified and experienced Intermediate Phase mathematics teachers and 95 Grades 4–6 learners from the Tshwane South district, where a phenomenon of low achievement was of great concern. We engaged in document analysis of all the 95 learners’ mathematics workbooks. Questionnaires were administered to the 43 teachers. We report on an analysis of teachers’ assessment practices of Grades 4–6 learners’ mathematics work. We narrate the extent of the use of TCs among teachers from selected schools in Tshwane South district in Gauteng, South Africa. Our analysis shows that while there is prevalent use of TCs among teachers, there are critical gaps in relation to knowledge of TCs in assessing mathematics. We present a qualitative and quantitative data analysis to illustrate how these were used in connection with assessment of learners’ mathematics work linked to the concepts of numerical, geometric, and graphical relationships. We use our analysis of the vignettes to explore and argue that teachers use TCs without adequate understanding of what these actually mean in relation to assessment broadly and assessment intended at collecting and clarifying goals for mathematical learning specifically. Despite teachers having mathematical qualifications and a repertoire of experience for teaching, the majority of teachers grappled with understanding mathematical concepts as evidence in how they marked learners’ mathematics work. The study also found that teachers’ understandings of assessment of mathematics were diverse and largely inconsistent with the formal definitions of mathematics.Contribution: This study indicated that there are critical gaps in relation to knowledge of TCs in assessing mathematics. A clear-cut marking policy will guide teachers to provide effective marking using TCs.","PeriodicalId":43521,"journal":{"name":"Pythagoras","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136098176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Discourse-based mathematics instruction on Grade 11 learners’ mathematical proficiency in algebra topics 基于语篇的数学教学对11年级学生代数主题数学能力的影响
IF 1.2 Q3 Mathematics Pub Date : 2023-07-07 DOI: 10.4102/pythagoras.v44i1.686
K. Luneta, Mekonnen Y. Legesse
School algebra serves as the language of mathematics and a foundational subject for learning advanced mathematics courses. This makes developing learners’ proficiency in algebra the most desirable instructional goal of school mathematics. Despite having such importance emphasis, however, studies indicate that the vast majority of learners are characterised by inadequate mathematics proficiency levels in general and in the algebra syllabus topics in particular. Consequently, this quasi-experimental study attempted to investigate the efficacy of using discourse-based instruction as an instructional approach to developing proficiency in algebra unit topics. One hundred and six (N = 106) Grade 11 learners participated in the study and were randomly grouped into an experimental group (n = 52) and a control group (n = 54). Using a test instrument that consisted of 24 Rasch-validated items, both pre-test and post-test data were collected from both groups under similar conditions. The Mann-Whitney U statistical analysis of the pre-test data revealed no significant difference between the control and experimental groups. The Mann-Whitney U analysis performed on the post-test data demonstrated that the experimental group scored significantly higher in the post-test scores when compared to the control group after the intervention. The study findings provided evidence of the efficacy of discourse-based instruction over teacher-centred instruction for developing learners’ algebra proficiency.Contribution: The study has contributed to the conceptual and practical understanding of how discourse-based instruction can be used to concretise learners’ proficiency in basic algebra.
学校代数是数学的语言,是学习高等数学课程的基础学科。这使得培养学生对代数的熟练程度成为学校数学最理想的教学目标。然而,尽管有如此重要的强调,研究表明,绝大多数学习者的特点是数学水平普遍不足,特别是代数教学大纲的主题。因此,这个准实验研究试图调查使用基于话语的教学方法作为培养代数单元主题熟练程度的教学方法的有效性。106名11年级学生参加了本研究,随机分为实验组(N = 52)和对照组(N = 54)。使用由24个rasch验证项目组成的测试仪器,在相似的条件下收集两组的测试前和测试后数据。Mann-Whitney U对测试前数据的统计分析显示,对照组和实验组之间没有显著差异。对后测数据进行的Mann-Whitney U分析表明,实验组在干预后的后测得分明显高于对照组。研究结果提供证据,证明以话语为基础的教学比以教师为中心的教学更有效地发展学习者的代数能力。贡献:该研究有助于从概念上和实践上理解基于话语的教学如何被用来具体化学习者对基本代数的熟练程度。
{"title":"Discourse-based mathematics instruction on Grade 11 learners’ mathematical proficiency in algebra topics","authors":"K. Luneta, Mekonnen Y. Legesse","doi":"10.4102/pythagoras.v44i1.686","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v44i1.686","url":null,"abstract":"School algebra serves as the language of mathematics and a foundational subject for learning advanced mathematics courses. This makes developing learners’ proficiency in algebra the most desirable instructional goal of school mathematics. Despite having such importance emphasis, however, studies indicate that the vast majority of learners are characterised by inadequate mathematics proficiency levels in general and in the algebra syllabus topics in particular. Consequently, this quasi-experimental study attempted to investigate the efficacy of using discourse-based instruction as an instructional approach to developing proficiency in algebra unit topics. One hundred and six (N = 106) Grade 11 learners participated in the study and were randomly grouped into an experimental group (n = 52) and a control group (n = 54). Using a test instrument that consisted of 24 Rasch-validated items, both pre-test and post-test data were collected from both groups under similar conditions. The Mann-Whitney U statistical analysis of the pre-test data revealed no significant difference between the control and experimental groups. The Mann-Whitney U analysis performed on the post-test data demonstrated that the experimental group scored significantly higher in the post-test scores when compared to the control group after the intervention. The study findings provided evidence of the efficacy of discourse-based instruction over teacher-centred instruction for developing learners’ algebra proficiency.Contribution: The study has contributed to the conceptual and practical understanding of how discourse-based instruction can be used to concretise learners’ proficiency in basic algebra.","PeriodicalId":43521,"journal":{"name":"Pythagoras","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48641924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring the development of South African pre-service teachers’ reflective practice 南非职前教师反思实践发展探索
IF 1.2 Q3 Mathematics Pub Date : 2023-06-21 DOI: 10.4102/pythagoras.v44i1.678
Samukeliso Chikiwa, Mellony Graven
{"title":"Exploring the development of South African pre-service teachers’ reflective practice","authors":"Samukeliso Chikiwa, Mellony Graven","doi":"10.4102/pythagoras.v44i1.678","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v44i1.678","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43521,"journal":{"name":"Pythagoras","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45488120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Online learning and peer support: Exploring the use of WhatsApp in first-year mathematics 在线学习和同伴支持:探索WhatsApp在一年级数学中的使用
IF 1.2 Q3 Mathematics Pub Date : 2023-05-31 DOI: 10.4102/pythagoras.v44i1.716
Mark Jacobs, F. George, Daniel Anga’ama
{"title":"Online learning and peer support: Exploring the use of WhatsApp in first-year mathematics","authors":"Mark Jacobs, F. George, Daniel Anga’ama","doi":"10.4102/pythagoras.v44i1.716","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v44i1.716","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43521,"journal":{"name":"Pythagoras","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70234840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Research Resilience in the COVID era 研究COVID时代的韧性
IF 1.2 Q3 Mathematics Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI: 10.4102/pythagoras.v43i1.714
Rajendran Govender
No abstract available.
没有可用的摘要。
{"title":"Research Resilience in the COVID era","authors":"Rajendran Govender","doi":"10.4102/pythagoras.v43i1.714","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v43i1.714","url":null,"abstract":"No abstract available.","PeriodicalId":43521,"journal":{"name":"Pythagoras","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45677093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ticks and crosses in primary mathematics assessments: What purpose do they serve? 小学数学评估中的勾号和叉号:它们有什么用途?
IF 1.2 Q3 Mathematics Pub Date : 2022-11-17 DOI: 10.4102/pythagoras.v43i1.647
Brian Chihodzi, W. Mwakapenda, B. Ngulube
Ticks and crosses (TCs) are a common aspect of teachers’ classroom practice in relation to assessment in many learning areas including mathematics. Putting TCs in learners’ written work is a strategy of feedback. Even though these TCs are frequently used in different types of mathematics assessments, there is limited research in relation to what they actually stand for and what functions they are designed for and especially what purpose they eventually serve in practice. This article emerged from a broader study that aimed at exploring classroom formative assessment practices of Grades 4–6 mathematics teachers, a learning goals and documentary analysis. Since this study was qualitative in nature, we used qualitative, non-probability sampling to recruit respondents according to pre-selected criteria relevant to our research questions. The study participants were 43 qualified and experienced Intermediate Phase mathematics teachers and 95 Grades 4–6 learners from the Tshwane South district, where a phenomenon of low achievement was of great concern. We engaged in document analysis of all the 95 learners’ mathematics workbooks. Questionnaires were administered to the 43 teachers. We report on an analysis of teachers’ assessment practices of Grades 4–6 learners’ mathematics work. We narrate the extent of the use of TCs among teachers from selected schools in Tshwane South district in Gauteng, South Africa. Our analysis shows that while there is prevalent use of TCs among teachers, there are critical gaps in relation to knowledge of TCs in assessing mathematics. We present a qualitative and quantitative data analysis to illustrate how these were used in connection with assessment of learners’ mathematics work linked to the concepts of numerical, geometric, and graphical relationships. We use our analysis of the vignettes to explore and argue that teachers use TCs without adequate understanding of what these actually mean in relation to assessment broadly and assessment intended at collecting and clarifying goals for mathematical learning specifically. Despite teachers having mathematical qualifications and a repertoire of experience for teaching, the majority of teachers grappled with understanding mathematical concepts as evidence in how they marked learners’ mathematics work. The study also found that teachers’ understandings of assessment of mathematics were diverse and largely inconsistent with the formal definitions of mathematics.Contribution: This study indicated that there are critical gaps in relation to knowledge of TCs in assessing mathematics. A clear-cut marking policy will guide teachers to provide effective marking using TCs.
在包括数学在内的许多学习领域,勾号和叉号是教师课堂实践中与评估相关的一个常见方面。将TC放在学习者的书面作品中是一种反馈策略。尽管这些TC经常用于不同类型的数学评估,但关于它们的实际含义、设计用途,尤其是它们最终在实践中的用途,研究有限。本文来自一项更广泛的研究,旨在探索4-6年级数学教师的课堂形成性评估实践、学习目标和文献分析。由于这项研究本质上是定性的,我们根据与我们的研究问题相关的预先选择的标准,使用定性、非概率抽样来招募受访者。研究参与者是来自茨瓦内南区的43名合格且经验丰富的中级数学教师和95名4-6年级的学习者,那里的低成绩现象非常令人担忧。我们对所有95名学生的数学练习册进行了文献分析。对43名教师进行了问卷调查。我们报告了对教师对4-6年级学生数学作业的评估实践的分析。我们叙述了南非豪登省Tshwane南区选定学校的教师使用TC的程度。我们的分析表明,虽然教师中普遍使用TC,但在评估数学时,在TC知识方面存在严重差距。我们提出了一个定性和定量的数据分析,以说明如何将这些数据用于评估与数字、几何和图形关系概念相关的学习者的数学工作。我们利用对小插曲的分析来探索和论证教师使用TC时,没有充分理解这些TC在广泛评估和旨在收集和明确数学学习目标的评估中的实际含义。尽管教师具有数学资格和丰富的教学经验,但大多数教师都在努力理解数学概念,以此作为他们如何标记学习者数学工作的证据。研究还发现,教师对数学评估的理解是多样的,并且在很大程度上与数学的正式定义不一致。贡献:这项研究表明,在评估数学时,TC的知识存在严重差距。明确的评分政策将指导教师使用TC进行有效的评分。
{"title":"Ticks and crosses in primary mathematics assessments: What purpose do they serve?","authors":"Brian Chihodzi, W. Mwakapenda, B. Ngulube","doi":"10.4102/pythagoras.v43i1.647","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v43i1.647","url":null,"abstract":"Ticks and crosses (TCs) are a common aspect of teachers’ classroom practice in relation to assessment in many learning areas including mathematics. Putting TCs in learners’ written work is a strategy of feedback. Even though these TCs are frequently used in different types of mathematics assessments, there is limited research in relation to what they actually stand for and what functions they are designed for and especially what purpose they eventually serve in practice. This article emerged from a broader study that aimed at exploring classroom formative assessment practices of Grades 4–6 mathematics teachers, a learning goals and documentary analysis. Since this study was qualitative in nature, we used qualitative, non-probability sampling to recruit respondents according to pre-selected criteria relevant to our research questions. The study participants were 43 qualified and experienced Intermediate Phase mathematics teachers and 95 Grades 4–6 learners from the Tshwane South district, where a phenomenon of low achievement was of great concern. We engaged in document analysis of all the 95 learners’ mathematics workbooks. Questionnaires were administered to the 43 teachers. We report on an analysis of teachers’ assessment practices of Grades 4–6 learners’ mathematics work. We narrate the extent of the use of TCs among teachers from selected schools in Tshwane South district in Gauteng, South Africa. Our analysis shows that while there is prevalent use of TCs among teachers, there are critical gaps in relation to knowledge of TCs in assessing mathematics. We present a qualitative and quantitative data analysis to illustrate how these were used in connection with assessment of learners’ mathematics work linked to the concepts of numerical, geometric, and graphical relationships. We use our analysis of the vignettes to explore and argue that teachers use TCs without adequate understanding of what these actually mean in relation to assessment broadly and assessment intended at collecting and clarifying goals for mathematical learning specifically. Despite teachers having mathematical qualifications and a repertoire of experience for teaching, the majority of teachers grappled with understanding mathematical concepts as evidence in how they marked learners’ mathematics work. The study also found that teachers’ understandings of assessment of mathematics were diverse and largely inconsistent with the formal definitions of mathematics.Contribution: This study indicated that there are critical gaps in relation to knowledge of TCs in assessing mathematics. A clear-cut marking policy will guide teachers to provide effective marking using TCs.","PeriodicalId":43521,"journal":{"name":"Pythagoras","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44591255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prospective teachers’ cognitive engagement during virtual teaching using GeoGebra and Desmos 基于GeoGebra和Desmos的虚拟教学中准教师的认知投入
IF 1.2 Q3 Mathematics Pub Date : 2022-11-04 DOI: 10.4102/pythagoras.v43i1.691
S. Tesfamicael
{"title":"Prospective teachers’ cognitive engagement during virtual teaching using GeoGebra and Desmos","authors":"S. Tesfamicael","doi":"10.4102/pythagoras.v43i1.691","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v43i1.691","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43521,"journal":{"name":"Pythagoras","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44456644","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Investigating the cognitive demand levels in probability and counting principles learning tasks from an online mathematics textbook 在线数学教材中概率与计数原理学习任务的认知需求水平研究
IF 1.2 Q3 Mathematics Pub Date : 2022-09-15 DOI: 10.4102/pythagoras.v43i1.677
George Ekol, Simphiwe Mlotshwa
This case study carried out during the 2020 coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown used online data collection means to investigate the distribution of cognitive demand levels of probability and counting principles (PCP) learning tasks in a popular online Grade 12 mathematics textbook, based on the PCP teachers’ rating. The teachers’ cognitive demand ratings were categorised following Stein’s mathematical task framework. Five mathematics teachers from four secondary schools in two provinces in South Africa participated in the study by filling in an online questionnaire. We developed a rating framework named the mean cognitive demand rating (MCDR) to help us interpret the teachers’ perception of the tasks in terms of cognitive demand to the learners. Data from the teachers’ ratings revealed nearly 65% of the PCP learning tasks in the online textbook were rated as high. Analysis of secondary data from Department of Basic Education diagnostic reports from 2014 to 2020, however, suggests no association between teachers’ rating of learning tasks and learner performance. Contribution: This study draws attention to a long-standing underperformance in the topic of probability and suggests classroom-based study that focuses on the learners’ rating of the learning tasks themselves to understand clearly how best to support them.
本案例研究在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)封锁期间进行,采用在线数据收集手段,根据概率与计数原理(PCP)教师评分,调查流行的12年级在线数学教科书中概率与计数原理(PCP)学习任务的认知需求水平分布。教师的认知需求等级按照Stein的数学任务框架进行分类。来自南非两个省四所中学的五名数学教师通过填写在线问卷参与了这项研究。我们开发了一个评分框架,称为平均认知需求评分(MCDR),以帮助我们解释教师在认知需求方面对学习者的任务感知。来自教师评分的数据显示,在线教科书中近65%的PCP学习任务被评为高。然而,对2014年至2020年基础教育部诊断报告中的二级数据的分析表明,教师对学习任务的评级与学习者的表现之间没有联系。贡献:这项研究引起了人们对概率主题长期表现不佳的关注,并建议以课堂为基础的研究,重点关注学习者对学习任务的评价,以清楚地了解如何最好地支持他们。
{"title":"Investigating the cognitive demand levels in probability and counting principles learning tasks from an online mathematics textbook","authors":"George Ekol, Simphiwe Mlotshwa","doi":"10.4102/pythagoras.v43i1.677","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v43i1.677","url":null,"abstract":"This case study carried out during the 2020 coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown used online data collection means to investigate the distribution of cognitive demand levels of probability and counting principles (PCP) learning tasks in a popular online Grade 12 mathematics textbook, based on the PCP teachers’ rating. The teachers’ cognitive demand ratings were categorised following Stein’s mathematical task framework. Five mathematics teachers from four secondary schools in two provinces in South Africa participated in the study by filling in an online questionnaire. We developed a rating framework named the mean cognitive demand rating (MCDR) to help us interpret the teachers’ perception of the tasks in terms of cognitive demand to the learners. Data from the teachers’ ratings revealed nearly 65% of the PCP learning tasks in the online textbook were rated as high. Analysis of secondary data from Department of Basic Education diagnostic reports from 2014 to 2020, however, suggests no association between teachers’ rating of learning tasks and learner performance. Contribution: This study draws attention to a long-standing underperformance in the topic of probability and suggests classroom-based study that focuses on the learners’ rating of the learning tasks themselves to understand clearly how best to support them.","PeriodicalId":43521,"journal":{"name":"Pythagoras","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44403535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Grade 10 teachers’ example selection, sequencing and variation during functions lessons 十年级老师在功能课上的例子选择、排序和变化
IF 1.2 Q3 Mathematics Pub Date : 2022-08-29 DOI: 10.4102/pythagoras.v43i1.696
H. Mbhiza
{"title":"Grade 10 teachers’ example selection, sequencing and variation during functions lessons","authors":"H. Mbhiza","doi":"10.4102/pythagoras.v43i1.696","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v43i1.696","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43521,"journal":{"name":"Pythagoras","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44254176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Pythagoras
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1