Hand Therapy最新文献

Introduction: Digital dynamometers to assess grip strength are becoming more common in research and clinical settings. The aim of the study was to assess validity and reliability of the K-force dynamometer compared to the Jamar dynamometer. We also aimed to assess differences over the course of three measurements.

Methods: Twenty-seven healthy participants were included. Three trials with the K-force and Jamar dynamometers were completed. Testing order was randomised. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with absolute agreement assessed reliability and validity. Standard error of the measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC₉₅) were calculated. Concurrent validity was assessed using Pearson's correlations and ICCs. Differences between the three repetitions were assessed using one-way repeated measures ANOVAs.

Results: Both the K-force and the Jamar presented excellent intra-rater reliability with ICCs ranging from 0.96 to 0.97. The SEM ranged from 1.7 to 2 kg and the MDC from 4.7 to 5.7 kg for both dynamometers. The concurrent validity of the K-force was high (r ≥ 0.89). However, the K-force underestimated the grip strength by 4.5-8.5 kg. There was no change in grip strength with either dynamometer over the course of three trials.

Conclusions: The K-force is reliable, but it underestimates grip strength by 4.5-8.5 kg compared to the Jamar dynamometer. K-force can be used to monitor progress over time but cannot be used to compare results against normative data. The use of a single measurement when assessing grip strength is sufficient when assessing healthy subjects.

Introduction: The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that has been translated and cross-culturally adapted to at least 50 languages. Since the measure was developed in 1996, many researchers have reported on the construct validity (including structural and cross-cultural validity) of this instrument following translation and cross-cultural adaptation. The aim of this scoping review was to identify the methods used for the psychometric evaluation of structural and cross-cultural validity of the DASH questionnaire.

Methods: The updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews and the PRISMA Extension for scoping reviews checklist was utilised. EBSCOHost (Academic Search Premier, Africa Wide, CINAHL, E-Journals and Medline), PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for articles (published between 1996-2022) and considered against the eligibility criteria.

Results: The scoping review collated evidence across 50 articles (37 language versions) of the evaluation of structural and cross-cultural validity of the DASH questionnaire. Three articles conducted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to assess structural validity, and none performed Multiple Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MGCFA) to assess cross-cultural validity.

Conclusion: The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) taxonomy propose that structural validity is best evaluated through CFA, with prior evidence of dimensionality. Additionally, cross-cultural validity (measurement invariance) is to be evaluated through MGCFA. This review identified that CFA is utilised infrequently and that to date cross-cultural validity has not been appropriately assessed for translations of the DASH questionnaire.

Introduction: Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is most common in the upper limb and associated with high disability. The purpose of this review was to critically appraise and synthesise literature exploring non-pharmacological treatment for upper limb CRPS, to guide upper-limb-specific management.

Methods: Using an integrative review methodology, 13 databases were searched to identify all published studies on non-pharmacological management of upper limb CRPS. The Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool was used to provide quality ratings for included studies, and analysis employed a qualitative descriptive approach.

Results: From 236 abstracts reviewed, 113 full texts were read, and 38 articles selected for data extraction. Designs included single case (n = 14), randomised controlled trial (n = 8), prospective cohort (n = 8), case series (n = 4), retrospective (n = 3), and mixed methods (n = 1). Interventions were categorised as sensory retraining (n = 13), kinesiotherapy (n = 7), manual therapies (n = 7), physical modalities (n = 6), and interdisciplinary treatment programmes (n = 5). All studies measured pain intensity, and most (n = 24) measured physical parameters such as strength, movement, or perceptual abilities. Few measured patient-rated function (n = 13) or psychological factors (n = 4). Quality ratings ranged from 30% to 93%, with a median of 60%.

Conclusion: Methodological quality of non-pharmacological treatment approaches for upper limb CRPS is overall poor. Movement, desensitisation, and graded functional activity remain the mainstays of intervention. However, despite the impact of CRPS on wellbeing and function, psychological factors and functional outcomes are infrequently addressed. Further robust research is required to determine which aspects of treatment have the greatest influence on which symptoms, and when and how these should be introduced and progressed.

Introduction: The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the evidence regarding prognostic factors for persistent pain, including Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), after a distal radius fracture (DRF), a common condition after which persistent pain can develop.

Methods: Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Psychinfo, CINAHL, BNI, AMED and the Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials were searched from inception to May 2021 for prospective longitudinal prognostic factor studies investigating persistent pain in adults who had sustained a DRF. The Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework were used to assess the strength of evidence.

Results: A search yielded 440 studies of which 7 studies met full eligibility criteria. From five studies we found low evidence for high baseline pain or an ulnar styloid fracture as prognostic factors for persistent pain, and very low evidence for diabetes or older age. From two studies, investigating an outcome of CRPS, there was low evidence for high baseline pain, slow reaction time, dysynchiria, swelling and catastrophising as prognostic factors, and very low evidence for depression. Sex was found not to be a prognostic factor for CRPS or persistent pain.

Conclusions: The associations between prognostic factors and persistent pain following a DRF are unclear. The small number of factors investigated in more than one study, along with poor reporting and methodological limitations contributed to an assessment of low to very low strength of evidence. Further prospective studies, investigating psychosocial factors as candidate predictors of multidimensional pain outcomes are recommended.

Introduction: Impaired functioning is seen in patients following replantation surgery to the thumb or fingers. Our aim was to explore long-term consequences and adaptation in daily life after a thumb and/or multiple finger amputation followed by replantation surgery during young age.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine recruited individuals and analysed using content analysis. The participants were asked to describe their hand function, pain, appearance, emotional consequences, impact on daily life and strategies for overcoming daily challenges.

Results: The interviews revealed five main categories: memories of the injury and concerns for the future; hand function, pain and cold sensitivity; feelings about having a visibly different hand; adaptation to impairments and challenges in daily life; and key messages to healthcare professions and advice to future patients.The circumstances of the injury were well remembered. Pain at rest was rare but occurred when grasping. Cold sensitivity was a major issue. Appearance-related concerns varied from none to a major problem. Despite impaired hand function, solutions were found to challenges in daily life. Compensatory strategies, personal resources and support from others were important in this adaptation process.

Conclusions: Patients with replantation surgery after an amputation during young age adapt to challenges in daily life over time. Healthcare professionals should offer adequate support to enable emotional processing of trauma experience. Appearance-related concerns should be addressed to prevent distress. Information about alleviating strategies to overcome long-term problems with cold sensitivity should be emphasized.

Introduction: This study investigates if the psychological subscale from the STarT Back Screening Tool (STarT Psych-sub) identifies patients at high risk of a poor functional outcome after a trapeziectomy based on modifiable psychological factors.

Methods: A total of 83 patients completed the STarT Psych-sub, QuickDASH (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand), Patient Evaluation Measure (PEM) and a numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) before trapeziectomy. QuickDASH, PEM and NPRS were completed at 6 weeks, 16 weeks and 1 year after the trapeziectomy.

Results: The STarT Psych-sub stratified 24 patients (29%) as 'high-risk' and 59 (71%) as 'not high-risk' of a poor outcome. The 'high-risk' group reported worse function and pain (QuickDASH = 72.7, PEM = 81.1, NPRS = 8.3) at baseline than the 'not high-risk' group (QuickDASH = 56.1, PEM = 66.4, NPRS = 7.2). This difference remained constant at all time points after the trapeziectomy with 1-year scores on the QuickDASH = 39.6; PEM = 47.1 and NPRS = 3.7 for the 'high-risk' group and QuickDASH = 24.3; PEM = 33.3 and NPRS = 1.9 for the 'not high-risk' group.

Conclusions: Brief psychological screening shows that patients with psychological risk factors experience improved pain and function outcomes following trapeziectomy, however their outcomes are significantly worse than patients who do not have psychological risk factors.

Introduction: There is a lack of methods to objectively evaluate improvement in distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability through treatment. We used ultrasonography to assess DRUJ instability and calculated the minimal detectable change (MDC) in healthy individuals. MDC was used to evaluate post-treatment changes in a patient with triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injury.

Methods: DRUJ instability was evaluated using force-monitor ultrasonography in eight healthy male participants to determine MDC and in a man in his 60s who underwent surgery and rehabilitation for TFCC injury (Palmer classification: type 2C). In the patient, DRUJ instability was measured pre-operatively, 3 months postoperatively, and 1 year post-operatively. Self-reported hand and upper limb functional ability were also recorded. The transducer of the force-monitor ultrasonographic system was used to apply cyclic compressions to the wrists automatically and measure DRUJ displacements. The amount of displacement was calculated using the distance between the radius and ulna before and during cyclic compression to the wrists. The applied pressure was measured as the force to the wrist, and the displacement-to-force ratio was calculated.

Results: The 95% confidence MDC₉₅ for radioulnar displacement, displacement force, and displacement-to-force ratio were 0.27-0.31 mm, 0.30-0.59 N, and 0.12-0.15 mm/N, respectively. The patient's post-operative decrease in displacement exceeded the MDC₉₅. DRUJ stability, pain, and use of the affected hand in daily life improved.

Discussion: Force-monitor ultrasonography can quantitatively evaluate post-treatment improvement in DRUJ stability over time. MDC for DRUJ instability can assess recovery after treatment or rehabilitation and determine changes resulting from interventions.

Introduction: There is variability in the information available for patients after carpal tunnel release (CTR). We aimed to establish (i) what advice should be provided regarding return to driving after CTR; (ii) how work activities should be categorised and defined in relation to CTR, and when patients should be recommended to return to these activities; (iii) what wound care and rehabilitation advice should be provided after CTR.

Methods: We developed consensus recommendations from an expert panel of hand surgeons, primary care surgeons and hand therapists using an electronic Delphi process. Participants were recruited from clinical organisations using pre-defined criteria. Delphi questionnaires included open text and tick-box responses. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement and summary feedback was provided after each round.

Results: There were 33 panellists (21 surgeons and 12 hand therapists), of which 27 (82%) completed all rounds. Expected return to driving was agreed as 5-14 days. Expected timescales were also agreed for return to seven selected occupational activities. Post-operative advice focused on using and moving the hand, rather than specific rehabilitation. While consensus was reached for most items, there were important areas of disagreement, including divergent views on driving with sutures in situ and the need to inform car insurers.

Conclusion: Recommendations from this study expand on existing advice by including functional descriptors for occupational activities and guidance timescales generated through a formal consensus process. Areas where consensus was not reached warrant further exploration to assess whether different practices impact clinical and functional outcomes for patients.

Introduction: Automated measurement of digital range of motion (ROM) may improve the accuracy of reporting and increase clinical efficiency. We hypothesize that a 3-D camera on a custom gantry will produce ROM measurements similar to those obtained with a manual goniometer.

Methods: A 3-D camera mounted on a custom gantry, was mechanized to rotate 200° around a platform. The video was processed to segment each digit and calculate joint angles in people with no history of any hand conditions or surgery to validate the system. A second-generation prototype was then assessed in people with different hand conditions. Metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint flexion were measured repeatedly with a goniometer and the automated system. The average difference between manual and automatic measurements was calculated along with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).

Results: In the initial validation, 1,488 manual and 1,488 automated joint measurements were obtained and the measurement algorithm was refined. In people with hand conditions, 688 manual and 688 automated joint measurements were compared. Average acquisition time was 7 s per hand, with an additional 2-3 s required for data processing. ICC between manual and automated data in the clinical study ranged from 0.65 to 0.85 for the MCP joints, and 0.22 to 0.66 for PIP joints.

Discussion: The automated system resulted in rapid data acquisition, with reliability varying by type of joint and location. It has the potential to improve efficiency in the collection of physical exam findings. Further developments of the system are needed to measure thumb and distal phalangeal motions.