Pub Date : 2020-12-31DOI: 10.1515/9780823282609-004
{"title":"Chapter 2. The Mirror Of The Anthropocene","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9780823282609-004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9780823282609-004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":440579,"journal":{"name":"The Unconstructable Earth","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124239582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-31DOI: 10.1515/9780823282609-008
{"title":"Chapter 5. An Ecology Of Resilience","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9780823282609-008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9780823282609-008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":440579,"journal":{"name":"The Unconstructable Earth","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121296489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-31DOI: 10.1515/9780823282609-003
{"title":"Chapter 1. The Screen Of Geoengineering","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9780823282609-003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9780823282609-003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":440579,"journal":{"name":"The Unconstructable Earth","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116907804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-10-16DOI: 10.5422/FORDHAM/9780823282586.003.0002
F. Neyrat
The first chapter begins with an overview of political discourses and discussions taking place around geo-constructivist discussions of climate change at the Copenhagen Summit on Climate Change and the potentially disastrous predicaments of those attempting to partake in potential solutions and perhaps actions that can only lead to more disastrous repercussions. Here, Neyrat begins to describe the peculiar situation and the “mirror of the Anthropocene” where mankind and a myriad of actors seemingly positioned to be in opposing camps find themselves embracing geo-constructivist program whereby re-making the Earth will be the task to undertake in an almost arrogant position of mankind at once being aware of its potential hand in the current predicaments of climate change as well as now, still, striving to embolden its position as “steward of the Earth,” willing to take into consideration technological advances that may or may not only worsen the situation with unexpected consequences.
{"title":"The Screen of Geoengineering","authors":"F. Neyrat","doi":"10.5422/FORDHAM/9780823282586.003.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5422/FORDHAM/9780823282586.003.0002","url":null,"abstract":"The first chapter begins with an overview of political discourses and discussions taking place around geo-constructivist discussions of climate change at the Copenhagen Summit on Climate Change and the potentially disastrous predicaments of those attempting to partake in potential solutions and perhaps actions that can only lead to more disastrous repercussions. Here, Neyrat begins to describe the peculiar situation and the “mirror of the Anthropocene” where mankind and a myriad of actors seemingly positioned to be in opposing camps find themselves embracing geo-constructivist program whereby re-making the Earth will be the task to undertake in an almost arrogant position of mankind at once being aware of its potential hand in the current predicaments of climate change as well as now, still, striving to embolden its position as “steward of the Earth,” willing to take into consideration technological advances that may or may not only worsen the situation with unexpected consequences.","PeriodicalId":440579,"journal":{"name":"The Unconstructable Earth","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127571769","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-10-16DOI: 10.5422/FORDHAM/9780823282586.003.0014
F. Neyrat, Drew S. Burk
In chapter 13 Neyrat summarizes a variety of conceptions of of the Earth conceived from various actors, from the early founding thinkers of the environmental and ecology movements in the United States such as Aldo Lepold and John Muir to more recent scientific conceptions of the Earth as a cybernetic living organism proposed by the celebrated scientist James Lovelock and his Gaia theory or Carolyn Merchant’s conception that each part of the ecosystem contributes to the health of the entire ecosystem as a whole. Neyrat goes on to show that what he terms minoritarian discourses refuse to consider the Earth as something that is mechanical in any way and that it is a living organism in its own right. These minoritarian discourses are in complete contrast to the variety of geo-constructivist discourses that today see the Earth as something technologically manageable.
{"title":"The Unconstructable Earth","authors":"F. Neyrat, Drew S. Burk","doi":"10.5422/FORDHAM/9780823282586.003.0014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5422/FORDHAM/9780823282586.003.0014","url":null,"abstract":"In chapter 13 Neyrat summarizes a variety of conceptions of of the Earth conceived from various actors, from the early founding thinkers of the environmental and ecology movements in the United States such as Aldo Lepold and John Muir to more recent scientific conceptions of the Earth as a cybernetic living organism proposed by the celebrated scientist James Lovelock and his Gaia theory or Carolyn Merchant’s conception that each part of the ecosystem contributes to the health of the entire ecosystem as a whole. Neyrat goes on to show that what he terms minoritarian discourses refuse to consider the Earth as something that is mechanical in any way and that it is a living organism in its own right. These minoritarian discourses are in complete contrast to the variety of geo-constructivist discourses that today see the Earth as something technologically manageable.","PeriodicalId":440579,"journal":{"name":"The Unconstructable Earth","volume":"28 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"120993998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-10-16DOI: 10.5422/fordham/9780823282586.003.0009
F. Neyrat
In Chapter 8, Neyrat further develops his critique regarding both Latour’s statement that we must “love our technological monsters” and the positions of postenvironmentalism and ecomodernism by questioning how it is that we’ve arrived at these positions: where a “political ecology” can ask us to “love technological monsters” while recognizing their eventual catastrophic consequences; where postenvironmentalists claim that there is no such thing as the environment; where the ecomodernists claim that t we will soon arrive into an era of the “super-Anthropocene” in which nature will no longer exist because there will no longer exist any space that hasn’t been touched by human development; where even Australian coral islands will become industrial products; and where we will be able to “decouple technological advances from environmental impacts.” Neyrat argues that all these seemingly recent ideas concerning nature or post-nature found in the work of the postenvironmentalists or ecomodernists are not that new and can be directly traced back to thinkers such as Marx and Engels where nature is considered as “an illusion, an ideological object.”
{"title":"Anaturalism and Its Ghosts","authors":"F. Neyrat","doi":"10.5422/fordham/9780823282586.003.0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823282586.003.0009","url":null,"abstract":"In Chapter 8, Neyrat further develops his critique regarding both Latour’s statement that we must “love our technological monsters” and the positions of postenvironmentalism and ecomodernism by questioning how it is that we’ve arrived at these positions: where a “political ecology” can ask us to “love technological monsters” while recognizing their eventual catastrophic consequences; where postenvironmentalists claim that there is no such thing as the environment; where the ecomodernists claim that t we will soon arrive into an era of the “super-Anthropocene” in which nature will no longer exist because there will no longer exist any space that hasn’t been touched by human development; where even Australian coral islands will become industrial products; and where we will be able to “decouple technological advances from environmental impacts.” Neyrat argues that all these seemingly recent ideas concerning nature or post-nature found in the work of the postenvironmentalists or ecomodernists are not that new and can be directly traced back to thinkers such as Marx and Engels where nature is considered as “an illusion, an ideological object.”","PeriodicalId":440579,"journal":{"name":"The Unconstructable Earth","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122731689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：