Journal of Critical Care Medicine最新文献

Objective: This is a pilot study to determine the feasibility of a multicentre stepped wedge cluster randomized trial of implementing the 2013 World Society of the Intraabdominal Compartment Syndrome (WSACS) guidelines as an intervention to treat intraabdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in critically ill patients.

Design: Single-centre before-and-after trial, with an observation / baseline period of 3 months followed by a 9-month intervention period.

Setting: A 35 bed medical-surgical-trauma intensive care unit in a tertiary level, Canadian hospital.

Patients: Recruitment from consecutively admitted adult intensive care unit patients.

Intervention: In the intervention period, treatment teams were prompted to implement WSACS interventions in all patients diagnosed with IAH.

Measurements and main results: 129 patients were recruited, 59 during the observation period and 70 during the intervention period. Only 17.0% and 12.9%, respectively, met diagnostic criteria for IAH. Many recruited patients did not have intraabdominal pressures measured regularly per study protocol. There was no difference in ICU mortality for patients in either cohort or between those with and without IAH.

Conclusions: The incidence of IAH in our patient population has decreased significantly since 2015. This is likely due to a significant change in routine care of critically ill patients, especially with respect to judicious goal-directed fluid resuscitation. Patient recruitment and protocol adherence in this study were low, exacerbated by other staffing and logistical pressures during the study period. We conclude that a larger multicentre trial is unlikely to yield evidence of a detectable treatment effect.

Introduction: Understanding the association between risk factors and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 can lead to identifying suitable management strategies for reducing the mortality rate among maternal COVID-19 patients in the ICU.

Aim of the study: This study aims to investigate the clinical outcomes and risk factors associated with pregnant and postpartum women diagnosed with COVID-19 and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between May 2020 and September 2021.

Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Universitas Indonesia Hospital. Secondary data was collected from the medical records to include all pregnant and postpartum women diagnosed with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to the hospital during the research period.

Results: The study included 113 patients and found that admission to the ICU, age, and gestational age significantly influenced clinical outcomes, with a mortality rate of 42.11% among ICU-admitted patients. Pre-existing comorbidities such as type-2 diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and coronary artery disease were associated with ICU admission. Having at least one comorbidity was found to increase the mortality rate by six-fold.

Conclusions: The study emphasizes the importance of monitoring and evaluating maternal and fetal complications during COVID-19 infection, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary management involving intensivists, obstetricians, anesthesiologists, and infectious disease specialists. The findings underscore the significance of baseline health status in treatment planning and the potential for evidence-based interventions to improve maternal outcomes and pregnancy preservation. Further research is warranted to validate these results and enhance understanding of the underlying pathophysiology.

Introduction: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by progressive lung inflammation which leads to increased dead space that can cause hypercapnia and can increase the risk of patient morbidity and mortality. In an attempt to improve ARDS patient outcomes provision of protective lung ventilation has been shown to improve patient mortality but increases the incidence of hypercapnia. Therefore, the role of carbon dioxide in ARDS remains contradicted by conflicted evidence. This study aims to examine this conflicting relationship between hyper-capnia and mortality in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 ARDS patients.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study. The data was collected from the medical records of the patients admitted with COVID-19 ARDS in Sindh Infectious Disease Hospital & Research Centre (SIDH & RC) from August 2020 to August 2022 and who received mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours. The patients were grouped into severe and no severe hypercapnia groups based on their arterial blood carbon dioxide levels (PaCO2). To understand the effect of hypercapnia on mortality we performed multivariable logistic regression, and inverse probability-weighted regression to adjust for time-varying confounders.

Results: We included 288 patients to detect at least 3% of the effect on mortality. Our analysis revealed an association of severe hypercapnia with severe lung injury, low PaO2/FiO2, high dead space, and poor compliance. In univariate analysis severe hypercapnia showed higher mortality: OR=3.50, 95% CI (1.46-8.43). However, after, adjusting for disease severity hypercapnia is not found to be associated with mortality: OR=1.08, 95% CI (0.32-3.64). The sensitive analysis with weighted regression also shows no significant effect on mortality: OR=1.04, 95% CI (0.95-1.14).

Conclusion: This study showed that hypercapnia is not associated with mortality in COVID-19 ARDS patients.

Introduction: The extent of in vivo damage to the alveolar-capillary membrane in patients with primary lung injury remains unclear. In cases of ARDS related to COVID-19 and Influenza type A, the complexity of the damage increases further, as viral pneumonia cannot currently be treated with a causal approach.

Aims of the study: Our primary goal is to enhance the understanding of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) by demonstrating damage to the alveocapillary membrane in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and influenza type A. We will achieve this by measuring the levels of proteins and albumin in bronchoalveolar fluid (BAL) and serum. Our secondary objective is to assess patient outcomes related to elevated protein and albumin levels in both BAL and blood serum, which will deepen our understanding of this complex condition.

Materials and methods: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and serum samples were meticulously collected from a total of 64 patients, categorized into three distinct groups: 30 patients diagnosed with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), 14 patients with influenza type A (H1N1 strain), also experiencing ARDS, and a control group consisting of 20 patients who were preoperatively prepared for elective surgical procedures without any diagnosed lung disease. The careful selection and categorization of patients ensure the robustness of our study. BAL samples were taken within the first 24 hours following the commencement of invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit, alongside measurements of serum albumin levels. In the control group, BAL and serum samples were collected after the induction of general endotracheal anaesthesia.

Results: Patients in the COVID-19 group are significantly older than those in the Influenza type A (H1N1) group, with median ages of 72.5 years and 62 years, respectively (p < 0.01, Mann-Whitney U test). Furthermore, serum albumin levels (measured in g/L) revealed significant differences across all three groups in the overall sample, yielding a p-value of less than 0.01 according to ANOVA. In terms of treatment outcomes, serum albumin levels also exhibited a significant correlation, with a p-value of 0.03 (Mann-Whitney U test). A reduction in serum albumin levels (below 35 g/L), combined with elevated protein levels in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), serves as a predictor of poor outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), as indicated by a p-value of less than 0.01 (ANOVA).

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that protein and albumin levels in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid are elevated in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) cases. This suggests that BAL can effectively evaluate protein levels and fractions, which could significantly assist in assessing damage to the alveolocapillary membrane. Additionally, t

Introduction: In traumatic brain injury (TBI), direct information can be obtained about cerebral blood flow, brain tissue oxygenation and cerebral perfusion pressure values. More importantly, an idea about the changes in these measurements can be obtained with multidimensional monitoring and widely used monitoring methods.

Aim of the study: We aimed to evaluate the monitoring of critically ill children who were followed up in our pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) due to TBI.

Material and method: Twenty-eight patients with head trauma who were followed up in our tertiary PICU between 2018 and 2020 were included in the study. Cerebral tissue oxygenation, optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), Glasgow coma score (GCS) and Glasgow Outcome Score (GOSE) values were obtained from retrospective file records and examined.

Results: Male gender was 71.4% (n=20). When we classified TBI according to GCS, 50% (n=14) had moderate TBI and 50% had severe TBI. On the first day in the poor prognosis group, ONSD and nICP were found to be higher than in the good prognosis group (for ONSD, p=0.01; and for nICP, p=0.004). On the second day of hospitalization, the ONSD and nICP were significantly higher in the poor prognosis group than in the good prognosis group (for ONSD p=0.002; and for nICP p= 0.001). Cerebral tissue oxygenation values measured on the first and second days decreased significantly on the second day in both the good and poor prognosis groups (p=0.03, 0.006). In the good prognosis group, a statistically significant decrease was found in ONSD and nICP measurements taken on the 2nd day compared to the measurements taken at the time of hospitalization (for ONSD p=0.004; for nICP p<0.001).

Conclusion: The aim of multidimensional follow-up in traumatic brain injury is to protect the brain from both primary and secondary damage; for this reason, it should be followed closely with multimonitoring methods that are possibly multidisciplinary.

Background: We used a ten-item postoperative quality of recovery score (QoR-10) to assess the perioperative quality of care in an in-hospital ambulatory surgical unit.

Methods: In Phase 1 of this secular trend study (n=300 patients, 3-months duration), we collected QoR-10 scores and potential confounders, including type of anesthesia and surgery; co-morbidities; and anesthesia components of the Amsterdam scale-measured anxiety scores. Phase 2 was the one-month performance feedback learning phase in which modifiable variables identified in Phase 1 were translated to actionable steps, reinforcing the already existing routine of our department's clinical practices, including pain, shivering and anxiety. The anesthesiology team was instructed and reminded of these steps using performance feedback methods. In Phase 3 (n=300 patients, 3-month duration) we evaluated the efficacy of this performance feedback instruction. QoR-10 scores were compared between Phase 1 and Phase 3.

Results: Phase 1 identified three modifiable variables as targets for improvement: postoperative shivering; percentage of patients with numerical rating pain scale (NRS)<4; and preoperative anxiety from anesthesia scores. Compared to Phase 1, significantly fewer Phase 3 patients had severe shivering (2.3% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.023), and a greater percentage had NRS < 4 points (79% vs. 49.7%, p <0.001). The percentage of patients with a high anxiety score did not differ between phases. A direct association between anxiety score and QoR-10 score was not detected. The QoR-10 score (median (IQR)) was significantly higher in Phase 3 than Phase 1: 50 (49-50) vs. 49(49-50), p<0.001. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, odds for a QoR-10 score of 49-50 were 1.92 higher in Phase 3 than Phase 1.

Conclusion: Considering the study limitations, team feedback education contributed to improvement of the QoR-10 score, reduced the proportion of patients with severe shivering and increased the percentage of patients with low pain scores.

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a disease that affects millions of people globally making it a major public health concern. It is defined as an abrupt decrease in kidney function that occurs within ours affecting both the structure and functionality of the kidneys.The outcome of AKI and the determinants in Nigeria are largely unknown. This study aimed to describe the determining factors of the outcome of AKI patients admitted into the ICU of three tertiary health institutions in Northeast Nigeria.

Methods: The study is a prospective multicentered observational study of the patients admitted into the ICU in three tertiary health institutions from January 2022 to December 2023. KDIGO criteria was used to define AKI. The outcome of the study was to determine survivors among the patients admitted into the ICU with AKI or developed AKI while in ICU and also the determinants of mortality. A chi-square test was done to determine the association between the dependent variable (patient outcome) and the independent variables. To determine the predictors of patient outcomes, a regression analysis was done. The sociodemographic data of the patients admitted during these periods were studied in addition to Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO), Average length of stay in the ICU, Admitting/referring ward (Obstetrics, Gynae, Medical, Surgical or Emergency unit), Ability to afford care (out of pocket payment, social welfare or through Health insurance Scheme, Co-morbidity (presence or absence of comorbidity), Interventions done while in ICU (use of vasopressors and inotropes, mechanical ventilation (MV) support and renal replacement therapy (RRT) and outcome (discharge to the wards or mortality).

Results: Of 1494 patient records screened, 464 met the inclusion criteria. The overall incidence of AKI was 57%. About 53% were females, the mean age was 42.2 years, and 81% of the patients had a normal BMI (18.5 - 24.9). About 40% of the patients had APACHE II scores ≥ 29%. More than three-quarters (79.5%) of the patients paid for their health care expenditure out-of-pocket. Most patients (72%) were from the Medical and Gynae/Ward. Mortality was highest (54.2%) among patients who were brought into the ICU from the Medical ward. Most patients admitted were KDIGO I (44.3%) followed by KDIGO II (35.1%). Among the patients, 61.2% present with one or more comorbidity. Mortality was higher (50%) among those with comorbidity compared to 13.6% among those without comorbidity. Mortality was lowest among patients who stayed in the ICU between 8-14 days compared to those who stayed > 2 weeks. Most of the patients (72%) were from the Medical and Gynae/Ward. Mortality was highest (54.2%) among patients who were brought into the ICU from the Medical ward followed by those brought in from the Obstetric and Gynecological ward (20.4%). An as

This overview addresses the pathophysiology of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS; conventional vs. COVID), the use of oxygen high flow (HFN) vs. noninvasive ventilation (NIV; conventional vs. helmet) and a multi-modal approach to avoid endotracheal intubation ("intubation"): low normal temperature, cooperative sedation, normalized systemic and microcirculation, anti-inflammation, reduced lung water, upright position, lowered intra-abdominal pressure. Increased ventilatory muscle activity ("respiratory drive") is observed in early ARDS, at variance with ventilatory fatigue observed in decompensated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This increased drive leads to impending then overt ventilatory failure. Therefore, muscle relaxation presents little rationale and should be replaced by lowering the excessive respiratory drive, increased work of breathing, continued or increased labored breathing, self-induced lung injury (SILI), i.e. preserving spontaneous breathing. As CMV is a lifesaver in the setting of failure but does not heal the lung, side-effects of intubation, controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV), paralysis and deep sedation are to be avoided. Additionally, critical care resources shortage requires practice changes. Therefore, NIV should be routine when addressing immune-compromised patients. The SARS-CoV2 pandemics extended this approach to most patients, which are immune-compromised: elderly, obese, diabetic, etc. The early COVID is a pulmonary vascular endothelial inflammatory disease requiring lower positive-end-expiratory pressure than the typical pulmonary alveolar epithelial inflammatory diffuse ARDS. This leads one to reassess a) the technique of NIV b) the sedation regimen facilitating continuous and extended NIV to avoid intubation. Autonomic, circulatory, respiratory, ventilatory physiology is hierarchized under HFN/NIV and cooperative sedation (dexmedetomidine, clonidine). A prospective randomized pilot trial, then a larger trial are required to ascertain our working hypotheses.

Background: Inter-hospital transfer is intended to provide access to centralized special care for critically ill patients, when resources in their hospitals are not available. However, an empirical gap exists in available evidence, as outcomes of transferred patients to higher centers are inconsistent.

Method: Single center propensity score matching retrospective observational study. Life-Saving transfers during 2023 were matched to direct admissions to the ICU. Hospital mortality, ICU length of stay, and costs of both groups were compared.

Results: During the study period, 328 Life-Saving transfers were matched to 656 direct admissions. Propensity score matching eliminated all imbalances between groups. Hospital mortality was not different between groups, there were 114 (34.8%) hospital mortalities of Life-Saving transfers, while there were 216 (32.9%) hospital mortalities of direct admissions, with a percent difference of 1.9% (95% CI: -4.5%, 8.4%); p value = 0.6, this result persisted in the sensitivity analysis. There were no differences in mortality risks for all the studied subgroups except pediatric patients. ICU length of stay of direct admissions and Life-Saving transfers were 10 ± 13.1 and 11.6 ± 12.4 days respectively, mean difference was statistically significant (-1.6 [95% CI: -3.2, 0.1]; p = 0.005). Life-Saving transfers entailed significantly higher costs per admission by 28,200 thousand SAR (95% CI: 26,400 - 30,000; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Our study shows no difference in hospital mortality between Life-Saving transfers and direct admissions to ICU, however, Life-Saving transfers had a longer ICU length of stay, and higher costs per admission.

Background: Neonatal sepsis is a serious condition with high rates of morbidity and mortality, caused by the rapid growth of microorganisms that trigger a systemic reaction. Symptoms can range from mild to severe presentations. The causative microorganism is usually transmitted from mothers, especially from the urogenital tract, or can originate from the community or hospital.

Methods: Our retrospective study assessed 121 newborns, including both preterm and term infants, divided into three groups within the first 28 days of life: early-onset sepsis (35), late-onset sepsis (39), and a control group (47). Blood samples and cultures were obtained upon admission or at the onset of sepsis (at 24 and 72 hours). The study aimed to evaluate the limitations of commonly used biomarkers and new markers such as lactate dehydrogenase and ferritin in more accurately diagnosing neonatal sepsis.

Results: Our study revealed a significant difference between the initial and final measures of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and ferritin in the early-onset sepsis (EOS) and late-onset sepsis (LOS) groups.

Conclusion: Ferritin and LDH may serve as potential markers associated with systemic response and sepsis in cases of both early and late-onset sepsis. Monitoring these biomarkers can aid in the timely detection and management of sepsis, potentially improving patient outcomes.