Pub Date : 2019-11-28DOI: 10.4324/9780429469411-28
C. Davies
Border Crossing journal has been home to multidisciplinary debates and scholarship since 2011. We have been trialling “open issue” model where articles are submitted and reviewed on a rolling basis year-round and if accepted, published without delay until the cut off date. Thus we set each volume to have two issues covering the first and second half of each year. Following two successful volumes, now it is established, and we are pleased to present four research papers in this issue of Border Crossing. We are grateful to our authors, reviewers, editorial board members, co-editors and readers for their support and contributions to the success of the Journal. In this issue, the first paper Argun Abrek Canbolat explores the possibilities of extended consciousness revisiting the extended mind hypothesis. He plays with the parity principle, which is followed by a review of the literature including key scholars’ work such as Andy Clark, Victor Loughlin, and Karina Vold. The second contribution is by Philip L. Martin. Philip’s always clear approach underlines the simplicity and factual aspects of contemporary migration debate with reference to the Trump administration. His brief and critical account of the Administration's policies and approach to immigration in the US is very informative backed up with facts and pointing to the possibilities and failures. It is a valuable record of American immigration policymaking. Carsten Schaefer’s paper reminds us of the role and impact of the sending governments in the current migration and integration challenges. Carsten argues that sending nation’s impact is often ignored. Rightly he points out the efforts by sending governments in reaching and controlling “their” diasporas. Many sending countries, especially emerging market economies are trying to do so. However, Carsten is taking on the largest one: China! He discusses the Chinese effort in using diaspora to achieve the desired image in the international arena as well as fostering economic progress. The last paper by Peter O’Brien draws our attention to the recently ever more topical feature of migration debates: the border. O’Brien presents a comprehensive review of the growing literature
自2011年以来，《边境过境》杂志一直是多学科辩论和学术研究的家园。我们一直在试行“公开发行”模式，即文章全年滚动提交和评审，如果被接受，在截止日期前不延迟发表。因此，我们将每册设置为每年上半年和下半年的两期。继两卷成功之后，现在它已经成立，我们很高兴在这一期的《边境穿越》上发表四篇研究论文。我们感谢我们的作者、审稿人、编辑委员会成员、共同编辑和读者对《华尔街日报》成功的支持和贡献。在本期中，第一篇论文argn Abrek Canbolat探讨了扩展意识的可能性，重新审视了扩展思维假说。他玩弄了宇称原则，随后回顾了包括Andy Clark、Victor Loughlin和Karina Vold等重要学者的著作在内的文献。第二个贡献来自Philip L. Martin。菲利普一贯清晰的方法强调了特朗普政府有关当代移民辩论的简单性和事实性。他对美国政府的移民政策和方法进行了简短而批判性的描述，内容丰富，有事实支持，并指出了可能性和失败。这是美国移民政策制定的宝贵记录。卡斯滕·谢弗的论文提醒我们，在当前的移民和融合挑战中，派遣国政府的作用和影响。卡斯滕认为，派遣国的影响往往被忽视。他正确地指出了派遣政府在接触和控制“他们的”侨民方面所做的努力。许多移民输出国，尤其是新兴市场经济体正试图这么做。然而，卡斯滕正在挑战最大的市场:中国!他讨论了中国利用侨民在国际舞台上实现理想形象以及促进经济进步的努力。彼得·奥布莱恩(Peter O 'Brien)的最后一篇论文将我们的注意力吸引到了最近移民辩论中越来越热门的一个特征:边界。O 'Brien对不断增长的文献进行了全面的回顾
{"title":"Border Crossing","authors":"C. Davies","doi":"10.4324/9780429469411-28","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429469411-28","url":null,"abstract":"Border Crossing journal has been home to multidisciplinary debates and scholarship since 2011. We have been trialling “open issue” model where articles are submitted and reviewed on a rolling basis year-round and if accepted, published without delay until the cut off date. Thus we set each volume to have two issues covering the first and second half of each year. Following two successful volumes, now it is established, and we are pleased to present four research papers in this issue of Border Crossing. We are grateful to our authors, reviewers, editorial board members, co-editors and readers for their support and contributions to the success of the Journal. In this issue, the first paper Argun Abrek Canbolat explores the possibilities of extended consciousness revisiting the extended mind hypothesis. He plays with the parity principle, which is followed by a review of the literature including key scholars’ work such as Andy Clark, Victor Loughlin, and Karina Vold. The second contribution is by Philip L. Martin. Philip’s always clear approach underlines the simplicity and factual aspects of contemporary migration debate with reference to the Trump administration. His brief and critical account of the Administration's policies and approach to immigration in the US is very informative backed up with facts and pointing to the possibilities and failures. It is a valuable record of American immigration policymaking. Carsten Schaefer’s paper reminds us of the role and impact of the sending governments in the current migration and integration challenges. Carsten argues that sending nation’s impact is often ignored. Rightly he points out the efforts by sending governments in reaching and controlling “their” diasporas. Many sending countries, especially emerging market economies are trying to do so. However, Carsten is taking on the largest one: China! He discusses the Chinese effort in using diaspora to achieve the desired image in the international arena as well as fostering economic progress. The last paper by Peter O’Brien draws our attention to the recently ever more topical feature of migration debates: the border. O’Brien presents a comprehensive review of the growing literature","PeriodicalId":443159,"journal":{"name":"Creating Multi-sensory Environments","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134215757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：