{"title":"The Early Modern Silk Industry, Trade and Mercantilism","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvb4bvj8.8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvb4bvj8.8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":443509,"journal":{"name":"The English East India Company's Silk Enterprise in Bengal, 1750–1850","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124808640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Measures and Currencies","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvb4bvj8.6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvb4bvj8.6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":443509,"journal":{"name":"The English East India Company's Silk Enterprise in Bengal, 1750–1850","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126164064","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-21DOI: 10.1017/9781787444928.013
{"title":"Return on Investment Analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1017/9781787444928.013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781787444928.013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":443509,"journal":{"name":"The English East India Company's Silk Enterprise in Bengal, 1750–1850","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122954424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Bengal Silk Industry and the English East India Company","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvb4bvj8.11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvb4bvj8.11","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":443509,"journal":{"name":"The English East India Company's Silk Enterprise in Bengal, 1750–1850","volume":"7 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114043223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-01DOI: 10.1017/9781787444928.002
Karolina Hutková
This book focuses on the English East India Company's venture into silk manufacturing in Bengal and presents the Company as a manufacturer that invested over £1 million in developing raw silk production in India. The book thus complements two bodies of literature – the strand that portrays the English East India Company (EEIC) as a commercial monopolistic entity or power structure, and the one that explains the rise of European manufacturing in terms of import substitution. This book studies the activities of the EEIC in adapting Bengal raw silk production to meet the demands of British silk weavers. Central to this was the transfer of silk technologies from the West to the East – this was one of the first transfers from Europe to Asia rather than vice versa. The transfer occurred in a mercantilist framework, and the transferred technologies connected trade and manufacturing. The outcome of this venture was influenced by the business and management capacities of the EEIC and by British, and eventually imperial, policies. This book ultimately presents a case of manufacturing failure: it argues that rather than being a failure of colonial economies, it was a failure of British imperial policies. Such a failure produced negative consequences for the Indian economy and stifled Indian economic development. By studying a specific case of manufacturing failure this book also contributes to our understanding of the involution of the Indian economy. Silk never achieved a high share of the global fibre market, and yet the economic, social and cultural role of silk in pre-industrial societies far outweighed its quantitative importance. Due to its high value and low volume, silk became one of the first globally traded commodities. Silk reeling – the process of silk thread production – and silk throwing – the process of making silk yarn from silk thread – were mechanised in Italy as early as the seventeenth and fourteenth century, respectively. As a labour-intensive industry, silk manufacturing had potential for employing the poor, produced goods of high value and generated state revenues through taxation. It thus attained the position of a strategic industry in many economies in Eurasia. The silk industry was also an important sector in Britain; although unable to produce raw silk domestically, Britain considered acquiring supplies of raw silk from its colonies and those territories under its influence. The most successful of such attempts was carried out by the EEIC in Bengal.
{"title":"Introduction: Companies, Political Economy and the Great Divergenc","authors":"Karolina Hutková","doi":"10.1017/9781787444928.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781787444928.002","url":null,"abstract":"This book focuses on the English East India Company's venture into silk manufacturing in Bengal and presents the Company as a manufacturer that invested over £1 million in developing raw silk production in India. The book thus complements two bodies of literature – the strand that portrays the English East India Company (EEIC) as a commercial monopolistic entity or power structure, and the one that explains the rise of European manufacturing in terms of import substitution. This book studies the activities of the EEIC in adapting Bengal raw silk production to meet the demands of British silk weavers. Central to this was the transfer of silk technologies from the West to the East – this was one of the first transfers from Europe to Asia rather than vice versa. The transfer occurred in a mercantilist framework, and the transferred technologies connected trade and manufacturing. The outcome of this venture was influenced by the business and management capacities of the EEIC and by British, and eventually imperial, policies. This book ultimately presents a case of manufacturing failure: it argues that rather than being a failure of colonial economies, it was a failure of British imperial policies. Such a failure produced negative consequences for the Indian economy and stifled Indian economic development. By studying a specific case of manufacturing failure this book also contributes to our understanding of the involution of the Indian economy. Silk never achieved a high share of the global fibre market, and yet the economic, social and cultural role of silk in pre-industrial societies far outweighed its quantitative importance. Due to its high value and low volume, silk became one of the first globally traded commodities. Silk reeling – the process of silk thread production – and silk throwing – the process of making silk yarn from silk thread – were mechanised in Italy as early as the seventeenth and fourteenth century, respectively. As a labour-intensive industry, silk manufacturing had potential for employing the poor, produced goods of high value and generated state revenues through taxation. It thus attained the position of a strategic industry in many economies in Eurasia. The silk industry was also an important sector in Britain; although unable to produce raw silk domestically, Britain considered acquiring supplies of raw silk from its colonies and those territories under its influence. The most successful of such attempts was carried out by the EEIC in Bengal.","PeriodicalId":443509,"journal":{"name":"The English East India Company's Silk Enterprise in Bengal, 1750–1850","volume":"42 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121425115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：