This article provides an overview of the legal framework that applies to website blocking injunctions in Europe. It highlights how enforcement tools constantly adapt to changes in infringement practices by expanding the arsenal of injunctions made available to rightholders. This adaptation occurs on different levels via legislative, judicial, administrative and soft law developments with the introduction of new measures that guarantee more prompt and efficient responses to infringement threats. From static, responses have increasingly become dynamic and live, to meet novel forms of infringement online, such as illegal broadcasting of live (sports) events. However, promptness and efficacy of enforcement responses often fit poorly with fundamental rights protection and proportionality of measures.
{"title":"Website blocking injunctions in flux: static, dynamic and live","authors":"Giancarlo F. Frosio, Oleksandr Bulayenko","doi":"10.1093/JIPLP/JPAB107","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JIPLP/JPAB107","url":null,"abstract":"This article provides an overview of the legal framework that applies to website blocking injunctions in Europe. It highlights how enforcement tools constantly adapt to changes in infringement practices by expanding the arsenal of injunctions made available to rightholders. This adaptation occurs on different levels via legislative, judicial, administrative and soft law developments with the introduction of new measures that guarantee more prompt and efficient responses to infringement threats. From static, responses have increasingly become dynamic and live, to meet novel forms of infringement online, such as illegal broadcasting of live (sports) events. However, promptness and efficacy of enforcement responses often fit poorly with fundamental rights protection and proportionality of measures.","PeriodicalId":44529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43561459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"European trade mark law: Quo Nunc Vadis? (The Sequel)","authors":"W. Leppink","doi":"10.1093/JIPLP/JPAB115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JIPLP/JPAB115","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49002672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andy Warhol Found for the Visual Arts, Inc v Goldsmith, 992 F.3d 99 (2d Cir 2021) The Second Circuit reversed the SDNY’s grant of summary judgment that Andy Warhol’s silk screen adaptation of a photographic portrait of entertainer Prince was a fair use; the 2d Circuit’s decision retreats both from its prior caselaw’s generous characterization of artistic reuse as ‘transformative’, and from the outcome-determinacy of a finding of ‘transformativeness’. The court also provided an important explanation of copyrightable authorship in photographs.
Andy Warhol Found for Visual Arts, Inc, v Goldsmith, 992 F.3d 99 (2d Cir 2021)第二巡回法院推翻了SDNY的即决判决，即Andy Warhol对艺人Prince的摄影肖像的丝网改编是合理使用;第二巡回法院的决定既放弃了先前判例法对艺术再利用的“变革性”的慷慨描述，也放弃了“变革性”的结果确定性。法院还对照片中受版权保护的作者身份作出了重要解释。
{"title":"US Second Circuit Court of Appeals tames ‘transformative’ fair use; rejects ‘celebrity-plagiarist privilege’; clarifies protectable expression in photographs","authors":"J. Ginsburg","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpab094","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpab094","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Andy Warhol Found for the Visual Arts, Inc v Goldsmith, 992 F.3d 99 (2d Cir 2021)\u0000 The Second Circuit reversed the SDNY’s grant of summary judgment that Andy Warhol’s silk screen adaptation of a photographic portrait of entertainer Prince was a fair use; the 2d Circuit’s decision retreats both from its prior caselaw’s generous characterization of artistic reuse as ‘transformative’, and from the outcome-determinacy of a finding of ‘transformativeness’. The court also provided an important explanation of copyrightable authorship in photographs.","PeriodicalId":44529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"60956118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
S. Ghimire, N. Barizah, I. Soeparna, Kim Van der Borght
{"title":"Plant variety protection law and farmers’ rights to save, exchange and breed seeds: the case of Indonesia","authors":"S. Ghimire, N. Barizah, I. Soeparna, Kim Van der Borght","doi":"10.1093/JIPLP/JPAB085","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JIPLP/JPAB085","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42449893","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A guide to IPR enforcement on the African continent","authors":"D. Olivier","doi":"10.1093/JIPLP/JPAA199","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JIPLP/JPAA199","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46995685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The CE marking in Turkey: is it indeed a guarantee trade mark?","authors":"Melih Sönmez, Ahmet Furkan Türkdoğan","doi":"10.1093/JIPLP/JPAB065","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JIPLP/JPAB065","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45748438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Registrability of pattern marks: the Louis Vuitton’s Damier Azur before the General Court of the EU","authors":"M. Giannino","doi":"10.1093/JIPLP/JPAA190","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JIPLP/JPAA190","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43418432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Global FRAND licensing: the UK Supreme Court Judgment in Unwired Planet v Huawei and Conversant v Huawei and ZTE","authors":"P. Treacy, Francion Brooks","doi":"10.1093/JIPLP/JPAB028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JIPLP/JPAB028","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44196312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Turkish Court of Cassation disregards the identity of the device elements of the signs when examining similarity","authors":"Berrin Dinçer Özbey, Ayşen Kunt","doi":"10.1093/JIPLP/JPAB114","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JIPLP/JPAB114","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42039289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"TuneIn for insight from the Court of Appeal on the troubling concept of communication to the public","authors":"Marc Linsner, Jeremy Blum","doi":"10.1093/JIPLP/JPAB103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JIPLP/JPAB103","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47117255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：