Pub Date : 2021-01-01Epub Date: 2020-11-18DOI: 10.1159/000511104
Jukka M Rintala, Pirita R Tahvonen, Saija T Vuolio, Ilpo T Typpö, Kai A Suokanerva, Heikki I Huhta
Introduction: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery has become widely used in treating colorectal cancer. Multicenter studies have shown that laparoscopy decreases postoperative complications and provides equivalent long-term oncological results compared to open surgery. Previous studies were conducted in high-volume institutions, with selected patients, which may influence the reported outcome of laparoscopy.
Methods: All patients with colorectal cancer that underwent surgery for a primary tumor between 2005 and 2015 in the Lapland Central Hospital were retrospectively collected. We retrieved data on the primary surgical outcome and complications within the first 30 days after surgery from patient records. We surveyed the national patient registry to determine long-term oncological results and patient survival.
Results: We identified 349 patients treated for colorectal cancer during 2005-2015. Of these, 219 patients (median age 71 years) underwent laparoscopy and 130 (median age 72 years) underwent open surgery. The 5-year disease-specific survival rates for stages I-III colon cancer were 83.3 and 87.7%, respectively. The 3-year disease-specific survival rates for stages I-III rectal cancer were 86.1 and 65.0%, respectively.
Conclusion: Our results showed that the introduction of laparoscopic colorectal surgery for treating cancer in a rural, small-volume hospital provided short- and long-term results comparable to findings from previous studies conducted in high-volume centers. Therefore, laparoscopy should be considered the treatment of choice for colorectal cancer in small, rural clinics.
{"title":"The Effect of Laparoscopic Technique on the Surgical Outcome of Colorectal Cancer in a Small-Volume Rural Finnish Lapland Central Hospital.","authors":"Jukka M Rintala, Pirita R Tahvonen, Saija T Vuolio, Ilpo T Typpö, Kai A Suokanerva, Heikki I Huhta","doi":"10.1159/000511104","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000511104","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laparoscopic colorectal surgery has become widely used in treating colorectal cancer. Multicenter studies have shown that laparoscopy decreases postoperative complications and provides equivalent long-term oncological results compared to open surgery. Previous studies were conducted in high-volume institutions, with selected patients, which may influence the reported outcome of laparoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients with colorectal cancer that underwent surgery for a primary tumor between 2005 and 2015 in the Lapland Central Hospital were retrospectively collected. We retrieved data on the primary surgical outcome and complications within the first 30 days after surgery from patient records. We surveyed the national patient registry to determine long-term oncological results and patient survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 349 patients treated for colorectal cancer during 2005-2015. Of these, 219 patients (median age 71 years) underwent laparoscopy and 130 (median age 72 years) underwent open surgery. The 5-year disease-specific survival rates for stages I-III colon cancer were 83.3 and 87.7%, respectively. The 3-year disease-specific survival rates for stages I-III rectal cancer were 86.1 and 65.0%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results showed that the introduction of laparoscopic colorectal surgery for treating cancer in a rural, small-volume hospital provided short- and long-term results comparable to findings from previous studies conducted in high-volume centers. Therefore, laparoscopy should be considered the treatment of choice for colorectal cancer in small, rural clinics.</p>","PeriodicalId":45017,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal Tumors","volume":"8 1","pages":"16-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000511104","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25485989","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01Epub Date: 2020-10-09DOI: 10.1159/000510350
Brian M Fung, Brian E Kadera, James H Tabibian
Self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are frequently utilized for palliation of malignant gastric and/or duodenal outlet obstruction (GDOO). Re-establishing luminal patency with accurate SEMS positioning while limiting migration and adjacent tissue injury is an important technical consideration and aim. The duodenal HANAROSTENT® was introduced in the USA in 2019 and developed with these challenges in mind. As the first center in the USA to deploy the duo-denal HANAROSTENT® in clinical practice, we herein examine our early experience with its use. Specifically, we describe 7 consecutive cases of malignant GDOO in which a duodenal HANAROSTENT® was placed for on-label use, defined as palliative treatment of malignant gastric and/or duodenal obstruction. All stents were 22 mm in diameter, with 5 being 90 mm and 2 being 120 mm in length. Technical and clinical success with duodenal HANAROSTENT® placement were achieved in all 7 cases (100%). In no case was stent adjustment required post-deployment. There were no stent-related adverse events, and no subsequent endoscopic procedures were necessary in any of the patients during a mean follow-up of 5 months (range 1-12 months). In summary, the duodenal HANAROSTENT® appears to perform well and be a promising alternative to other available duodenal SEMSs. As experience in the USA with this newly introduced duodenal SEMS grows, multicenter prospective data should be collected to better establish its relative safety and efficacy.
自膨胀金属支架(SEMSs)常用于缓解恶性胃和/或十二指肠出口梗阻(GDOO)。通过精确的SEMS定位重建腔内通畅,同时限制移位和邻近组织损伤是重要的技术考虑和目标。十二指肠HANAROSTENT®于2019年在美国推出,并考虑到这些挑战而开发。作为美国第一个在临床实践中部署双牙HANAROSTENT®的中心,我们在此研究我们使用它的早期经验。具体来说,我们描述了连续7例恶性GDOO,其中十二指肠HANAROSTENT®用于标签上的使用,定义为恶性胃和/或十二指肠梗阻的姑息性治疗。所有支架直径为22 mm,其中5个为90 mm, 2个为120 mm。所有7例(100%)十二指肠HANAROSTENT®放置的技术和临床成功。在任何情况下,支架部署后都不需要调整。在平均5个月(1-12个月)的随访期间,没有发生支架相关的不良事件,也没有后续的内镜手术。综上所述,十二指肠HANAROSTENT®表现良好,是一种有希望的替代其他可用的十二指肠SEMSs。随着美国对这种新引入的十二指肠SEMS的经验不断增加,需要收集多中心前瞻性数据以更好地确定其相对安全性和有效性。
{"title":"Gastrointestinal Luminal Stenting: The Early US Experience with the Duodenal HANAROSTENT.","authors":"Brian M Fung, Brian E Kadera, James H Tabibian","doi":"10.1159/000510350","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000510350","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are frequently utilized for palliation of malignant gastric and/or duodenal outlet obstruction (GDOO). Re-establishing luminal patency with accurate SEMS positioning while limiting migration and adjacent tissue injury is an important technical consideration and aim. The duodenal HANAROSTENT<sup>®</sup> was introduced in the USA in 2019 and developed with these challenges in mind. As the first center in the USA to deploy the duo-denal HANAROSTENT<sup>®</sup> in clinical practice, we herein examine our early experience with its use. Specifically, we describe 7 consecutive cases of malignant GDOO in which a duodenal HANAROSTENT<sup>®</sup> was placed for on-label use, defined as palliative treatment of malignant gastric and/or duodenal obstruction. All stents were 22 mm in diameter, with 5 being 90 mm and 2 being 120 mm in length. Technical and clinical success with duodenal HANAROSTENT<sup>®</sup> placement were achieved in all 7 cases (100%). In no case was stent adjustment required post-deployment. There were no stent-related adverse events, and no subsequent endoscopic procedures were necessary in any of the patients during a mean follow-up of 5 months (range 1-12 months). In summary, the duodenal HANAROSTENT<sup>®</sup> appears to perform well and be a promising alternative to other available duodenal SEMSs. As experience in the USA with this newly introduced duodenal SEMS grows, multicenter prospective data should be collected to better establish its relative safety and efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":45017,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal Tumors","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000510350","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39453135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-01Epub Date: 2020-08-12DOI: 10.1159/000509185
Andrey G Kriger, David S Gorin, Stanislav V Berelavichus, Vladimir I Panteleev, Ayrat R Kaldarov
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) and solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) are uncommon cystic tumors of the pancreas. The simultaneous occurrence of these 2 pancreatic neoplasms is extremely rare. We present a case of synchronous solid SPN and IPMN - carcinoma in a 44-year-old female patient. An uncommon surgical treatment was performed - pancreatoduodenectomy with the resection of the pancreas body, resection of the mesentericoportal trunk + distal pancreatectomy, and splenectomy. Part of the pancreatic tissue was preserved.
{"title":"Successful Surgical Treatment of a Patient with Synchronic Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Carcinoma and Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas.","authors":"Andrey G Kriger, David S Gorin, Stanislav V Berelavichus, Vladimir I Panteleev, Ayrat R Kaldarov","doi":"10.1159/000509185","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000509185","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) and solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) are uncommon cystic tumors of the pancreas. The simultaneous occurrence of these 2 pancreatic neoplasms is extremely rare. We present a case of synchronous solid SPN and IPMN - carcinoma in a 44-year-old female patient. An uncommon surgical treatment was performed - pancreatoduodenectomy with the resection of the pancreas body, resection of the mesentericoportal trunk + distal pancreatectomy, and splenectomy. Part of the pancreatic tissue was preserved.</p>","PeriodicalId":45017,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal Tumors","volume":"7 4","pages":"151-155"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000509185","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38683527","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Surveillance of gastric precancerous lesions (GPL) may reduce gastric cancer (GC)-related mortality, but some patients with GPL are lost to follow-up.
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a "phone-call" strategy in surveillance of the lost to follow-up patients.
Patients and methods: Among all the patients diagnosed with GPL (atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, low-grade dysplasia) between 2000 and 2015, we identified those who should undergo surveillance endoscopy according to the current guidelines. They were contacted by telephone and invited to undergo endoscopy with gastric biopsies for histological analysis.
Results: Among 535 patients with GPL, 134 were contacted. Sixty-two (46%) could not be joined, 36 did not have endoscopy for other reasons, and finally, 36 patients (22 males, median age 65 years) were included. After the median time interval of 57 months between 2 endoscopies, 18 patients showed stability, 11 regression, and 7 progression of GPL, including 1 patient who developed GC.
Conclusion: Despite several telephone calls, only one-third of the contacted patients could be brought to surveillance endoscopy. Most of the patients showed stability of GPL, but 1 progressed to GC and could be successfully treated.
{"title":"Evaluation of a Phone Call Reminder Strategy in the Surveillance of Patients with Gastric Precancerous Lesions Lost to Follow-Up.","authors":"Nicolas Chapelle, Iva Jirka, Matthieu Péron, Lucille Quénéhervé, Estelle Cauchin, Yann Touchefeu, Emmanuel Coron, Jean-François Mosnier, Tamara Matysiak-Budnik","doi":"10.1159/000508873","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000508873","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surveillance of gastric precancerous lesions (GPL) may reduce gastric cancer (GC)-related mortality, but some patients with GPL are lost to follow-up.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a \"phone-call\" strategy in surveillance of the lost to follow-up patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Among all the patients diagnosed with GPL (atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, low-grade dysplasia) between 2000 and 2015, we identified those who should undergo surveillance endoscopy according to the current guidelines. They were contacted by telephone and invited to undergo endoscopy with gastric biopsies for histological analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 535 patients with GPL, 134 were contacted. Sixty-two (46%) could not be joined, 36 did not have endoscopy for other reasons, and finally, 36 patients (22 males, median age 65 years) were included. After the median time interval of 57 months between 2 endoscopies, 18 patients showed stability, 11 regression, and 7 progression of GPL, including 1 patient who developed GC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite several telephone calls, only one-third of the contacted patients could be brought to surveillance endoscopy. Most of the patients showed stability of GPL, but 1 progressed to GC and could be successfully treated.</p>","PeriodicalId":45017,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal Tumors","volume":"7 4","pages":"110-116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000508873","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38587209","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-01Epub Date: 2020-07-28DOI: 10.1159/000508386
Wali Badar, Thuong Van Ha, Steven Zangan, Rakesh Navuluri, Anjana Pillai, Talia Baker, Osman Ahmed
Purpose: To report outcomes of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) using glass microspheres for the treatment of mixed hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (HCC-CC) in a propensity-matched study.
Material and methods: Between 2013 and 2019, 10 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed HCC-CC received TARE of a targeted territory using glass microspheres as a primary initial treatment. Baseline demographics in addition to tumor distribution, Child Pugh score, and BCLC were recorded. Tumor response was assessed according to modified RECIST criteria. The HCC-CC cohort was matched to the HCC cohort, and objective response and survival analysis was performed.
Results: In the HCC-CC cohort, patients had a 70% objective response rate (ORR), and in the HCC cohort, patients had a 90% ORR after matching (p = 0.54). The median overall survival (OS) for HCC patients was 12.3 months (95% CI: 6.0-17.4 months) in the matched population, and for HCC-CC patients, the median OS was 15.2 months (95% CI: 2.7-20.2 months) (p = 0.98). The median progression-free survival (PFS) for HCC patients was 11.6 months (95% CI: 2.53-19.3 months) in the matched population, and for HCC-CC patients, the median PFS was 15.2 months (95% CI: 2.7-20.2 months) (p = 0.94). The median transplant-free survival (TFS) for HCC patients was 12.3 months (95% CI: 6.0-17.4 months) in the matched population, and for HCC-CC patients, the median TFS was 15.2 months (95% CI: 2.7-20.2 months) (p = 0.98).
Conclusions: While outcomes of combined HCC-CC are poor and optimal treatment remains undefined, TARE appears to represent an effective locoregional treatment with survival outcomes similar to that of HCC treated by TARE.
{"title":"Yttrium-90 Radioembolization Therapy for Combined Hepatocellular and Cholangiocarcinoma.","authors":"Wali Badar, Thuong Van Ha, Steven Zangan, Rakesh Navuluri, Anjana Pillai, Talia Baker, Osman Ahmed","doi":"10.1159/000508386","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000508386","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report outcomes of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) using glass microspheres for the treatment of mixed hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (HCC-CC) in a propensity-matched study.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Between 2013 and 2019, 10 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed HCC-CC received TARE of a targeted territory using glass microspheres as a primary initial treatment. Baseline demographics in addition to tumor distribution, Child Pugh score, and BCLC were recorded. Tumor response was assessed according to modified RECIST criteria. The HCC-CC cohort was matched to the HCC cohort, and objective response and survival analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the HCC-CC cohort, patients had a 70% objective response rate (ORR), and in the HCC cohort, patients had a 90% ORR after matching (<i>p</i> = 0.54). The median overall survival (OS) for HCC patients was 12.3 months (95% CI: 6.0-17.4 months) in the matched population, and for HCC-CC patients, the median OS was 15.2 months (95% CI: 2.7-20.2 months) (<i>p</i> = 0.98). The median progression-free survival (PFS) for HCC patients was 11.6 months (95% CI: 2.53-19.3 months) in the matched population, and for HCC-CC patients, the median PFS was 15.2 months (95% CI: 2.7-20.2 months) (<i>p</i> = 0.94). The median transplant-free survival (TFS) for HCC patients was 12.3 months (95% CI: 6.0-17.4 months) in the matched population, and for HCC-CC patients, the median TFS was 15.2 months (95% CI: 2.7-20.2 months) (<i>p</i> = 0.98).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While outcomes of combined HCC-CC are poor and optimal treatment remains undefined, TARE appears to represent an effective locoregional treatment with survival outcomes similar to that of HCC treated by TARE.</p>","PeriodicalId":45017,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal Tumors","volume":"7 4","pages":"144-150"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000508386","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38683526","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-01Epub Date: 2020-09-16DOI: 10.1159/000510342
Morteza Kordafshari, Mahyar Nourian, Narjes Mehrvar, Hassan Jalaeikhoo, Aida Etemadi, Ali Reza Khoshdel, Mohammad Ghaznavi Idris, Shahrokh Iravani, Azim Mehrvar
Background: Cancer is one of the major causes of death worldwide and the third leading cause of death in Iran. One of the proteins that are considered having anticancer effects is the adiponectin hormone. Adiponectin leads to programmed cell death, prevents cell growth and proliferation, and increases the expression levels of BCL2.
Aim: The aim of this study was to assay the expression of adiponectin receptors (AdipoR1 and AdipoR2) genes in gastric cancer patients.
Materials and methods: In this case-control study, 42 gastric cancer patients and 52 volunteers as healthy controls were enrolled. Total RNA was extracted. cDNA was synthesized by the reverse transcription method, and expression analysis was performed by real-time PCR. The serum level of adiponectin was also measured by ELISA.
Results: The expression of both AdipoR1 and AdipoR2 was significantly higher than the control group (p = 0.02). Serum adiponectin was significantly lower in gastric cancer cases when compared with normal controls (p = 0.03).
Conclusion: We found that expression level of AdipoR1 and AdipoR2 is strongly higher; however, the level of circulating adiponectin is lower in gastric cancer. Our study suggests that the expression of AdipoR1 and AdipoR2, besides the low level of adiponectin, may play an important role in the development and/or progression of gastric cancer.
{"title":"Expression of <i>AdipoR1</i> and <i>AdipoR2</i> and Serum Level of Adiponectin in Gastric Cancer.","authors":"Morteza Kordafshari, Mahyar Nourian, Narjes Mehrvar, Hassan Jalaeikhoo, Aida Etemadi, Ali Reza Khoshdel, Mohammad Ghaznavi Idris, Shahrokh Iravani, Azim Mehrvar","doi":"10.1159/000510342","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000510342","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer is one of the major causes of death worldwide and the third leading cause of death in Iran. One of the proteins that are considered having anticancer effects is the adiponectin hormone. Adiponectin leads to programmed cell death, prevents cell growth and proliferation, and increases the expression levels of <i>BCL2</i>.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to assay the expression of adiponectin receptors (<i>AdipoR1</i> and <i>AdipoR2</i>) genes in gastric cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this case-control study, 42 gastric cancer patients and 52 volunteers as healthy controls were enrolled. Total RNA was extracted. cDNA was synthesized by the reverse transcription method, and expression analysis was performed by real-time PCR. The serum level of adiponectin was also measured by ELISA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The expression of both <i>AdipoR1</i> and <i>AdipoR2</i> was significantly higher than the control group (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Serum adiponectin was significantly lower in gastric cancer cases when compared with normal controls (<i>p</i> = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that expression level of <i>AdipoR1</i> and <i>AdipoR2</i> is strongly higher; however, the level of circulating adiponectin is lower in gastric cancer. Our study suggests that the expression of <i>AdipoR1</i> and <i>AdipoR2</i>, besides the low level of adiponectin, may play an important role in the development and/or progression of gastric cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":45017,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal Tumors","volume":"7 4","pages":"103-109"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000510342","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38587208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-01Epub Date: 2020-08-12DOI: 10.1159/000508874
Yan Yang, Lin Han, Da-Ning Lin, Zeng-Ji Hu, Wei Tu, Feng Chen, Yong-Qiang Li
Background: Primary duct closure (PDC) after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has been widely applied for choledocholithiasis. However, there has been controversy over the placement of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) during operation. To date, few studies compare the clinical effect of PDC without and with ENBD. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of PDC without ENBD for choledocholithiasis.
Methods: From January 2016 to December 2018, a total of 164 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled and divided into group A (undergone LCBDE + PDC without ENBD, 81 cases) and group B (undergone LCBDE + PDC with ENBD, 83 cases) in this study. The intraoperative conditions and postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups.
Results: In group A, the time of operation, postoperative first flatus, extubation, antibiotics, and discharge were shorter than in group B (t = -17.775, p = 0.000; t = -7.649, p = 0.000; t = -5.807, p = 0.000; t = -9.247, p = 0.000; t = -9.322, p = 0.000, respectively). Furthermore, intraoperative blood loss was less (t = -2.199, p = 0.029) and hospital costs were lower (t = -6.685, p = 0.000). However, there was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the 2 groups (p > 0.05).
Conclusions: In patients who meet the screening criteria, PDC without ENBD after LCBDE is safe and effective and worthy of clinical application.
背景:腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)后一期胆总管闭合术(PDC)已广泛应用于胆总管结石的治疗。然而,手术中内镜下鼻胆道引流术(ENBD)的放置一直存在争议。迄今为止,很少有研究比较无ENBD和有ENBD的PDC的临床效果。本研究的目的是评估无ENBD的PDC治疗胆总管结石的安全性和有效性。方法:2016年1月至2018年12月,本研究共纳入164例符合纳入标准的患者,分为a组(行LCBDE + PDC,无ENBD, 81例)和B组(行LCBDE + PDC,合并ENBD, 83例)。比较两组患者术中情况及术后并发症。结果:A组患者手术时间、术后首次排气时间、拔管时间、抗生素使用时间、出院时间均短于B组(t = -17.775, p = 0.000;T = -7.649, p = 0.000;T = -5.807, p = 0.000;T = -9.247, p = 0.000;T = -9.322, p = 0.000)。术中出血量较少(t = -2.199, p = 0.029),住院费用较低(t = -6.685, p = 0.000)。两组术后并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。结论:在符合筛查标准的患者中,LCBDE术后无ENBD的PDC是安全有效的,值得临床推广。
{"title":"The Safety and Efficacy of Primary Duct Closure without Endoscopic Nasobiliary Drainage after Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration.","authors":"Yan Yang, Lin Han, Da-Ning Lin, Zeng-Ji Hu, Wei Tu, Feng Chen, Yong-Qiang Li","doi":"10.1159/000508874","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000508874","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary duct closure (PDC) after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has been widely applied for choledocholithiasis. However, there has been controversy over the placement of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) during operation. To date, few studies compare the clinical effect of PDC without and with ENBD. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of PDC without ENBD for choledocholithiasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2016 to December 2018, a total of 164 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled and divided into group A (undergone LCBDE + PDC without ENBD, 81 cases) and group B (undergone LCBDE + PDC with ENBD, 83 cases) in this study. The intraoperative conditions and postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In group A, the time of operation, postoperative first flatus, extubation, antibiotics, and discharge were shorter than in group B (<i>t</i> = -17.775, <i>p</i> = 0.000; <i>t</i> = -7.649, <i>p</i> = 0.000; <i>t</i> = -5.807, <i>p</i> = 0.000; <i>t</i> = -9.247, <i>p</i> = 0.000; <i>t</i> = -9.322, <i>p</i> = 0.000, respectively). Furthermore, intraoperative blood loss was less (<i>t</i> = -2.199, <i>p</i> = 0.029) and hospital costs were lower (<i>t</i> = -6.685, <i>p</i> = 0.000). However, there was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the 2 groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients who meet the screening criteria, PDC without ENBD after LCBDE is safe and effective and worthy of clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":45017,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal Tumors","volume":"7 4","pages":"117-124"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000508874","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38587210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-01Epub Date: 2020-08-13DOI: 10.1159/000509824
Tse-Ming Kuo, Kai-Ming Chang, Kuo-Jang Kao
Introduction: Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging has been an important clinical guideline for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). BCLC 0 and A stages (BCLC 0/A) have been designated as the early-stage HCC, and the curative treatment is recommended as the primary therapeutic modality. However, a recent study indicated that a significant number of BCLC 0/A patients were not initially managed with the curative treatment without knowing why.
Methods: We, therefore, conducted a study on BCLC 0/A patients who had and had not received initial curative treatment cared at our cancer center from January 2011 to December 2015 and analyzed causes contributing to not having the initial curative treatment.
Results: One hundred and sixty-nine BCLC 0/A patients were identified and included in the study. Seventy two patients (43%) received the initial curative treatment and 97 patients (57%) did not. After careful review of medical records, all 97 patients without the initial curative treatment had identifiable reasons for not having the initial curative treatment. Two main reasons for not having the initial curative treatment were "probable presence of additional HCC and requiring diagnostic angiography" (28%) and "difficult or complicating anatomical location of tumors" (17%). When the relevant clinical parameters were compared between the 2 groups of patients, it was found that patients without the initial curative treatment had more serious clinical conditions and worse overall and recurrence-free survival outcomes compared with those who had the initial curative treatment.
Discussion/conclusion: Our finding indicates that a significant fraction of the BCLC 0/A HCC patients is unable to have initial curative treatment as recommended by BCLC guidelines. These early stages of HCC patients represent a distinctive subpopulation and are in need of further investigation to improve their survival outcomes.
{"title":"Why Cannot BCLC 0- or A-Stage Patients Receive Curative Treatment?","authors":"Tse-Ming Kuo, Kai-Ming Chang, Kuo-Jang Kao","doi":"10.1159/000509824","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000509824","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging has been an important clinical guideline for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). BCLC 0 and A stages (BCLC 0/A) have been designated as the early-stage HCC, and the curative treatment is recommended as the primary therapeutic modality. However, a recent study indicated that a significant number of BCLC 0/A patients were not initially managed with the curative treatment without knowing why.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We, therefore, conducted a study on BCLC 0/A patients who had and had not received initial curative treatment cared at our cancer center from January 2011 to December 2015 and analyzed causes contributing to not having the initial curative treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and sixty-nine BCLC 0/A patients were identified and included in the study. Seventy two patients (43%) received the initial curative treatment and 97 patients (57%) did not. After careful review of medical records, all 97 patients without the initial curative treatment had identifiable reasons for not having the initial curative treatment. Two main reasons for not having the initial curative treatment were \"probable presence of additional HCC and requiring diagnostic angiography\" (28%) and \"difficult or complicating anatomical location of tumors\" (17%). When the relevant clinical parameters were compared between the 2 groups of patients, it was found that patients without the initial curative treatment had more serious clinical conditions and worse overall and recurrence-free survival outcomes compared with those who had the initial curative treatment.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>Our finding indicates that a significant fraction of the BCLC 0/A HCC patients is unable to have initial curative treatment as recommended by BCLC guidelines. These early stages of HCC patients represent a distinctive subpopulation and are in need of further investigation to improve their survival outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":45017,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal Tumors","volume":"7 4","pages":"125-133"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000509824","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38587211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-01Epub Date: 2020-09-14DOI: 10.1159/000510341
Nicholas Lim, Dupinder Singh, Scott Jackson, John R Lake
Background: Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have revolutionized the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV). The impact of DAAs on recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) remains uncertain.
Objective: We aimed to evaluate the risk of HCC recurrence in LT recipients cleared of HCV with DAAs at the time of LT compared to a control group of LT recipients who were viremic at the time of LT.
Methods: The study was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing LT for HCV-related HCC from 2002 to 2017. We compared time to post-LT HCC recurrence in patients with a sustained virological response (SVR) from DAAs prior to LT (DAA group) to patients who were viremic at LT (HCV+ group) using Kaplan-Meier analysis. We performed a secondary analysis comparing post-LT HCC recurrence in the DAA group to LT recipients with SVR from interferon-based treatment prior to LT (IFN group).
Results: One hundred fifty-one patients underwent LT for HCC related to HCV: 34 patients in DAA group, 95 patients in HCV+ group, and 22 in IFN group. Kaplan-Meier estimates of being HCC free were 96.2, 96.2, and 78.8% at 6, 12, and 24 months in DAA group, respectively, and 100, 98.6, and 95.8% at 6, 12, and 24 months in the HCV+ group, respectively; p = 0.08. There was no difference observed for HCC recurrence between the DAA and IFN groups. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, DAA use increased the risk of post-LT HCC recurrence (HR 5.2, 95% CI 0.9-29.81, p = 0.07).
Conclusions: A strong trend was observed on both Kaplan-Meier and multivariate analyses toward increased post-LT HCC recurrence in patients who achieved SVR prior to LT with DAAs compared to patients who were viremic at LT. Caution is required when considering pre-LT treatment of HCV with DAAs in patients with HCC.
背景:直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)已经彻底改变了丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)的治疗。DAAs对肝移植术后肝细胞癌(HCC)复发的影响尚不确定。目的:我们旨在评估在肝移植时已清除HCV的DAAs肝移植受体与在肝移植时病毒血症的肝移植受体对照组相比,肝移植时HCC复发的风险。方法:该研究是一项单中心、回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2002年至2017年接受肝移植的HCV相关HCC患者。我们使用Kaplan-Meier分析比较了肝移植前DAA有持续病毒学反应(SVR)的患者(DAA组)和肝移植时病毒血症的患者(HCV+组)的肝移植后复发时间。我们进行了一项次要分析,比较DAA组和肝移植前干扰素治疗SVR的肝移植受体(IFN组)的肝移植后HCC复发。结果:151例HCV相关HCC行肝移植:DAA组34例,HCV+组95例,IFN组22例。在DAA组中,6、12和24个月时无HCC的Kaplan-Meier估计值分别为96.2、96.2和78.8%;在HCV+组中,6、12和24个月时无HCC的Kaplan-Meier估计值分别为100、98.6和95.8%;P = 0.08。DAA组与IFN组HCC复发率无差异。在多变量Cox比例风险模型中,DAA的使用增加了lt后HCC复发的风险(HR 5.2, 95% CI 0.9-29.81, p = 0.07)。结论:Kaplan-Meier和多变量分析均显示,与肝移植时病毒血症患者相比,肝移植前经DAAs治疗的SVR患者肝移植后肝细胞癌复发率增加。考虑肝移植前肝细胞癌患者经DAAs治疗的HCV需要谨慎。
{"title":"Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Liver Transplant Recipients Treated with Pretransplant Direct-Acting Antiviral (DAA) Therapy.","authors":"Nicholas Lim, Dupinder Singh, Scott Jackson, John R Lake","doi":"10.1159/000510341","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000510341","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have revolutionized the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV). The impact of DAAs on recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the risk of HCC recurrence in LT recipients cleared of HCV with DAAs at the time of LT compared to a control group of LT recipients who were viremic at the time of LT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing LT for HCV-related HCC from 2002 to 2017. We compared time to post-LT HCC recurrence in patients with a sustained virological response (SVR) from DAAs prior to LT (DAA group) to patients who were viremic at LT (HCV+ group) using Kaplan-Meier analysis. We performed a secondary analysis comparing post-LT HCC recurrence in the DAA group to LT recipients with SVR from interferon-based treatment prior to LT (IFN group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred fifty-one patients underwent LT for HCC related to HCV: 34 patients in DAA group, 95 patients in HCV+ group, and 22 in IFN group. Kaplan-Meier estimates of being HCC free were 96.2, 96.2, and 78.8% at 6, 12, and 24 months in DAA group, respectively, and 100, 98.6, and 95.8% at 6, 12, and 24 months in the HCV+ group, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.08. There was no difference observed for HCC recurrence between the DAA and IFN groups. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, DAA use increased the risk of post-LT HCC recurrence (HR 5.2, 95% CI 0.9-29.81, <i>p</i> = 0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A strong trend was observed on both Kaplan-Meier and multivariate analyses toward increased post-LT HCC recurrence in patients who achieved SVR prior to LT with DAAs compared to patients who were viremic at LT. Caution is required when considering pre-LT treatment of HCV with DAAs in patients with HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":45017,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal Tumors","volume":"7 4","pages":"134-143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000510341","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38587212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-01Epub Date: 2020-08-18DOI: 10.1159/000509186
Andreas Mavroudis, Evangelos Cholongitas
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is considered to be the fourth most frequent cause of cancer-associated death globally. HCC might be associated, especially in advanced stages, with the formation of tumor thrombus (TT), which can be located in the portal vein, as well as in hepatic and/or inferior vena cava (IVC) veins. Nevertheless, the extension of TT to the right atrium (RA) is infrequent with an unfavorable prognosis. We present a rare case of a male patient with HCC and IVC TT extending to the RA. The atrial thrombus was the first manifestation of HCC diagnosed by cardiac ultrasound. So far, the patient has undergone 4 courses of transarterial chemoembolization in combination with systemic therapy with sorafenib, and under this therapeutic approach long-term survival has been achieved.
{"title":"Long-Term Survival under Arterial Chemoembolization and Sorafenib of a Patient with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Tumor Atrial Thrombus: A Case Report and Literature Review.","authors":"Andreas Mavroudis, Evangelos Cholongitas","doi":"10.1159/000509186","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000509186","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is considered to be the fourth most frequent cause of cancer-associated death globally. HCC might be associated, especially in advanced stages, with the formation of tumor thrombus (TT), which can be located in the portal vein, as well as in hepatic and/or inferior vena cava (IVC) veins. Nevertheless, the extension of TT to the right atrium (RA) is infrequent with an unfavorable prognosis. We present a rare case of a male patient with HCC and IVC TT extending to the RA. The atrial thrombus was the first manifestation of HCC diagnosed by cardiac ultrasound. So far, the patient has undergone 4 courses of transarterial chemoembolization in combination with systemic therapy with sorafenib, and under this therapeutic approach long-term survival has been achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":45017,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal Tumors","volume":"7 4","pages":"156-162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000509186","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38683528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}