首页 > 最新文献

Allergy & Rhinology最新文献

英文 中文
Not All Rashes Are Allergic: Keratoderma Blennorrhagicum-Like Rash Masquerading as Contact Dermatitis. 并非所有的皮疹都是过敏性的:blennorrhagicaskeratoderma - like皮疹伪装成接触性皮炎。
IF 2.2 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2018-12-04 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/2152656718811566
Maxwell Y Li, Jason Kolfenbach, Alan Schocket
A 56-year-old Caucasian man was referred to the allergy clinic for evaluation of palmoplantar dermatitis. The patient’s rash developed one year prior to presentation. He described erythema, pruritus, and hyperkeratosis of the involved skin with the eventual development of deep fissuring. He had a history of onychomycosis of his toenails but no history of fungal skin rash. He was exposed to solvents, mineral spirits, and gasoline through his occupation in home renovation and wearing neither nitrile nor cotton gloves alleviated his symptoms. Prior evaluations were carried out by primary care and dermatology. He had been treated with topical emollients, topical steroids (including potent agents such as clobetasol) for suspected atopic dermatitis, and topical antifungal agents as well (although KOH prep was negative). All prior treatments failed to resolve his severe palmoplantar rash. His medical history included hypertension, obesity, fatty liver disease, uveitis, bilateral total hip arthroplasty, and a history of childhood allergic rhinitis for which he underwent allergen immunotherapy and was quiescent at the time of evaluation. The physical examination was significant for moderately erythematous, hyperkeratotic, well-defined plaques on the palmoplantar surfaces of the hands and feet without dorsal involvement. Fissuring was seen at the fingertips and the plantar surface of the feet (Figure 1(A) to (D)) without associated pustulosis. There were no obvious nail pitting, oil spots, nor onycholysis, and scalp examination was normal. External examination of the eyes and oral examination were both normal. No appreciable synovitis was documented on peripheral joint examination, but the patient appeared “stiff” with ambulation as well as when stepping down from the examination table. Patch testing result revealed a weak positive reaction to gold sodium thiosulfate and an irritant reaction to thimerosal. Common sensitizers of allergic contact dermatitis in the construction worker were evaluated. The patient did not have reactions to potassium dichromate found in cements, biocides such as isothiazolinones, rubber chemical, and metal allergens (ie, chrome, thiurams, carbamates, mercaptobenzothiazole) accounting for foot dermatitis from work boot materials, and epoxy resin. These results, along with the patient’s history, led to decreased suspicion for either contact or atopic dermatitis. Given the patient’s history of uveitis (which upon review of the chart was recurrent and associated with HLA-B27 positivity), the hyperkeratotic and plaque-like appearance of his lesions, and the concern for possible axial spine disease based on examination, formal radiographs were obtained (Figure 2) and a referral to rheumatology was initiated. His rheumatologic evaluation confirmed decreased range of motion at the spine with an abnormal occiput to wall test of 8 cm, abnormal Schober’s test (10–12 cm increase with flexion and no reversal of lumbar lordosis), and decrease
{"title":"Not All Rashes Are Allergic: Keratoderma Blennorrhagicum-Like Rash Masquerading as Contact Dermatitis.","authors":"Maxwell Y Li, Jason Kolfenbach, Alan Schocket","doi":"10.1177/2152656718811566","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2152656718811566","url":null,"abstract":"A 56-year-old Caucasian man was referred to the allergy clinic for evaluation of palmoplantar dermatitis. The patient’s rash developed one year prior to presentation. He described erythema, pruritus, and hyperkeratosis of the involved skin with the eventual development of deep fissuring. He had a history of onychomycosis of his toenails but no history of fungal skin rash. He was exposed to solvents, mineral spirits, and gasoline through his occupation in home renovation and wearing neither nitrile nor cotton gloves alleviated his symptoms. Prior evaluations were carried out by primary care and dermatology. He had been treated with topical emollients, topical steroids (including potent agents such as clobetasol) for suspected atopic dermatitis, and topical antifungal agents as well (although KOH prep was negative). All prior treatments failed to resolve his severe palmoplantar rash. His medical history included hypertension, obesity, fatty liver disease, uveitis, bilateral total hip arthroplasty, and a history of childhood allergic rhinitis for which he underwent allergen immunotherapy and was quiescent at the time of evaluation. The physical examination was significant for moderately erythematous, hyperkeratotic, well-defined plaques on the palmoplantar surfaces of the hands and feet without dorsal involvement. Fissuring was seen at the fingertips and the plantar surface of the feet (Figure 1(A) to (D)) without associated pustulosis. There were no obvious nail pitting, oil spots, nor onycholysis, and scalp examination was normal. External examination of the eyes and oral examination were both normal. No appreciable synovitis was documented on peripheral joint examination, but the patient appeared “stiff” with ambulation as well as when stepping down from the examination table. Patch testing result revealed a weak positive reaction to gold sodium thiosulfate and an irritant reaction to thimerosal. Common sensitizers of allergic contact dermatitis in the construction worker were evaluated. The patient did not have reactions to potassium dichromate found in cements, biocides such as isothiazolinones, rubber chemical, and metal allergens (ie, chrome, thiurams, carbamates, mercaptobenzothiazole) accounting for foot dermatitis from work boot materials, and epoxy resin. These results, along with the patient’s history, led to decreased suspicion for either contact or atopic dermatitis. Given the patient’s history of uveitis (which upon review of the chart was recurrent and associated with HLA-B27 positivity), the hyperkeratotic and plaque-like appearance of his lesions, and the concern for possible axial spine disease based on examination, formal radiographs were obtained (Figure 2) and a referral to rheumatology was initiated. His rheumatologic evaluation confirmed decreased range of motion at the spine with an abnormal occiput to wall test of 8 cm, abnormal Schober’s test (10–12 cm increase with flexion and no reversal of lumbar lordosis), and decrease","PeriodicalId":45192,"journal":{"name":"Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2018-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2152656718811566","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36768834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Endoscopic Management of Lacrimal System Dysgenesis and Dacryocystoceles in Fraser Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review. 弗雷泽综合征中泪系统发育不良及泪囊囊肿的内镜治疗:1例报告及文献复习。
IF 2.2 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2018-10-22 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/2152656718804905
Megan E Falls, Michael P Rabinowitz, Jacqueline R Carrasco, Mindy R Rabinowitz

Background: Fraser syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized primarily by syndactyly, cryptophthalmos, urinary tract anomalies, ambiguous genitalia, and laryngeal anomalies. A 28-year-old man with Fraser syndrome presented with cryptophthalmos, microphthalmia, lacrimal system dysgenesis, and chronic sinusitis.

Objective: The patients' clinical condition and surgical treatment are described. A literature review was conducted, and articles relevant to the case are presented.

Methods: Case report.

Results: To our knowledge, this is the first published case report of endonasal management of dacryocystoceles in a Fraser syndrome patient. The patient was treated via endoscopic endonasal marsupialization and drainage.

Conclusion: Fraser syndrome patients may initially present to many different specialties as the spectrum of clinical manifestations is broad. Physicians treating these patients should take a collaborative approach to surgical and medical management.

背景:Fraser综合征是一种常染色体隐性遗传病,主要表现为并指畸形、隐眼、尿路异常、生殖器模糊和喉部异常。28岁男性弗雷泽综合征表现为隐眼,小眼,泪系统发育不良,慢性鼻窦炎。目的:描述患者的临床情况及手术治疗。进行了文献综述,并提出了与该病例相关的文章。方法:病例报告。结果:据我们所知,这是首次发表的弗雷泽综合征患者鼻腔内处理泪囊囊肿的病例报告。患者经鼻内窥镜造袋引流术治疗。结论:弗雷泽综合征患者最初可能表现为许多不同的专科,因为临床表现广泛。治疗这些患者的医生应该采取外科和医学管理的合作方法。
{"title":"Endoscopic Management of Lacrimal System Dysgenesis and Dacryocystoceles in Fraser Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review.","authors":"Megan E Falls,&nbsp;Michael P Rabinowitz,&nbsp;Jacqueline R Carrasco,&nbsp;Mindy R Rabinowitz","doi":"10.1177/2152656718804905","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2152656718804905","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fraser syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized primarily by syndactyly, cryptophthalmos, urinary tract anomalies, ambiguous genitalia, and laryngeal anomalies. A 28-year-old man with Fraser syndrome presented with cryptophthalmos, microphthalmia, lacrimal system dysgenesis, and chronic sinusitis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The patients' clinical condition and surgical treatment are described. A literature review was conducted, and articles relevant to the case are presented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Case report.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>To our knowledge, this is the first published case report of endonasal management of dacryocystoceles in a Fraser syndrome patient. The patient was treated via endoscopic endonasal marsupialization and drainage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fraser syndrome patients may initially present to many different specialties as the spectrum of clinical manifestations is broad. Physicians treating these patients should take a collaborative approach to surgical and medical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":45192,"journal":{"name":"Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2018-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2152656718804905","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36621315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Randomized Trials of Nasal Patency and Dermal Tolerability With External Nasal Dilators in Healthy Volunteers. 健康志愿者使用外扩鼻器鼻通畅性和皮肤耐受性的随机试验。
IF 2.2 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2018-10-05 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/2152656718796740
John Ward, Renee Ciesla, William Becker, Gilbert Marava Shanga

Background: External nasal dilator strips are used as nonpharmacological therapy to reduce snoring and daytime sleepiness. In a product improvement initiative, a marketed strip (BRNS) and 2 prototype nasal strips were evaluated.

Objective: To compare the nasal patency and multiple-use dermal tolerability of the BRNS and prototype nasal strips using both objective and subject-reported outcome measures.

Methods: Two studies were conducted separately in healthy volunteers ≥18 years of age. A single-day nasal patency randomized crossover study assessed minimal cross-sectional area (MCA; second restriction) and nasal volume (using acoustic rhinometry); nasal inspiratory flow and resistance (using posterior rhinomanometry); and subject-reported evaluations of the BRNS compared with the butterfly strip and teardrop strip prototypes. A single-center, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, evaluator-blinded study assessed dermal tolerability of the BRNS and the butterfly strip over 7 consecutive nights of use, using the Dermal Response Scale (DRS) and subject-reported comfort and ease of removal.

Results: In the Patency study (N = 50), all 3 strips demonstrated significant improvement from baseline in MCA, nasal volume, and nasal flow parameters (resistance and peak flow). The prototype strips demonstrated significantly more improvement in nasal volume than the BRNS, and the butterfly strip showed significantly more improvement in MCA than the BRNS; all strips were similar with respect to nasal flow and subject-reported nasal breathing outcomes. In the Dermal Tolerability study (N = 82), all subjects scored 0 (no evidence of irritation) on the DRS at all 7 morning assessments; the BRNS was numerically, but not significantly, superior to the butterfly strip on subject-reported outcomes.

Conclusion: The Patency study demonstrated significant improvement from baseline in nasal dimensions and flow for all 3 evaluated strips; between-strip differences were confined to nasal dimensions. Both the BRNS and butterfly strip were generally well tolerated, with no evidence of dermal response over 7 consecutive nights of use.ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01105949 and NCT01495494.

背景:鼻外扩张条被用作减少打鼾和白天嗜睡的非药物治疗。在产品改进计划中,对一种已上市的鼻贴(BRNS)和2种原型鼻贴进行了评估。目的:通过客观和受试者报告的结果测量,比较BRNS和原型鼻贴的鼻腔通畅性和多次使用的皮肤耐受性。方法:两项研究分别在年龄≥18岁的健康志愿者中进行。一项为期一天的鼻通畅随机交叉研究评估了最小横截面积(MCA;第二限制)和鼻容积(使用声学鼻测量法);鼻吸气流量和阻力(使用后鼻测压法);以及受试者报告的BRNS与蝴蝶条和泪滴条原型的比较。一项单中心、随机、对照、平行组、评估者盲法研究,使用皮肤反应量表(DRS)和受试者报告的舒适度和去除难易程度,评估了BRNS和蝴蝶条连续使用7晚后的皮肤耐受性。结果:在Patency研究中(N = 50),所有3条试纸在MCA、鼻容积和鼻流量参数(阻力和峰值流量)方面均较基线有显著改善。原型条对鼻容积的改善明显大于BRNS,蝴蝶条对MCA的改善明显大于BRNS;所有测试条在鼻流量和受试者报告的鼻腔呼吸结果方面相似。在皮肤耐受性研究(N = 82)中,所有受试者在所有7次上午评估中DRS得分为0(无刺激证据);在受试者报告的结果上,BRNS在数值上优于蝴蝶条,但并不显著。结论:通畅性研究表明,与基线相比,所有3条评估条的鼻尺寸和流量均有显著改善;条带间差异仅限于鼻尺寸。BRNS和蝴蝶条的耐受性一般都很好,在连续7个晚上的使用中没有皮肤反应的证据。
{"title":"Randomized Trials of Nasal Patency and Dermal Tolerability With External Nasal Dilators in Healthy Volunteers.","authors":"John Ward,&nbsp;Renee Ciesla,&nbsp;William Becker,&nbsp;Gilbert Marava Shanga","doi":"10.1177/2152656718796740","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2152656718796740","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>External nasal dilator strips are used as nonpharmacological therapy to reduce snoring and daytime sleepiness. In a product improvement initiative, a marketed strip (BRNS) and 2 prototype nasal strips were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the nasal patency and multiple-use dermal tolerability of the BRNS and prototype nasal strips using both objective and subject-reported outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two studies were conducted separately in healthy volunteers ≥18 years of age. A single-day nasal patency randomized crossover study assessed minimal cross-sectional area (MCA; second restriction) and nasal volume (using acoustic rhinometry); nasal inspiratory flow and resistance (using posterior rhinomanometry); and subject-reported evaluations of the BRNS compared with the butterfly strip and teardrop strip prototypes. A single-center, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, evaluator-blinded study assessed dermal tolerability of the BRNS and the butterfly strip over 7 consecutive nights of use, using the Dermal Response Scale (DRS) and subject-reported comfort and ease of removal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the Patency study (N = 50), all 3 strips demonstrated significant improvement from baseline in MCA, nasal volume, and nasal flow parameters (resistance and peak flow). The prototype strips demonstrated significantly more improvement in nasal volume than the BRNS, and the butterfly strip showed significantly more improvement in MCA than the BRNS; all strips were similar with respect to nasal flow and subject-reported nasal breathing outcomes. In the Dermal Tolerability study (N = 82), all subjects scored 0 (no evidence of irritation) on the DRS at all 7 morning assessments; the BRNS was numerically, but not significantly, superior to the butterfly strip on subject-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Patency study demonstrated significant improvement from baseline in nasal dimensions and flow for all 3 evaluated strips; between-strip differences were confined to nasal dimensions. Both the BRNS and butterfly strip were generally well tolerated, with no evidence of dermal response over 7 consecutive nights of use.<b>ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers:</b> NCT01105949 and NCT01495494.</p>","PeriodicalId":45192,"journal":{"name":"Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2018-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2152656718796740","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36573931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Effect of Nigella sativa Nasal Spray on the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without a Nasal Polyp. 黑草鼻喷雾剂治疗无鼻息肉的慢性鼻窦炎疗效观察。
IF 2.2 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2018-10-04 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/2152656718800059
Ahmad Rezaeian, Sanaz Amoushahi Khouzani

Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common inflammatory disease of nasal and paranasal sinuses, with many treatment methods available for the management of this disease. Recently, herbal medicines have shown a significant impact on inflammatory diseases such as CRS, and one of these herbal medicines is Nigella sativa. Therefore, the current study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of N. sativa in patients with CRS without nasal polyp (CRSsNP).

Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 65 patients with mild to moderate CRSsNP were enrolled based on the inclusion criteria. Patients were divided randomly into 2 parallel groups: intervention and placebo groups. Patients in the intervention group received 2 puffs/day of N. sativa nasal spray (1 g/day of N. sativa) and in the placebo group received 2 puffs/day of sodium chloride spray 0.65%.

Results: Thirty-one patients (19 men and 12 women) in the intervention group and 34 in the placebo group (18 men and 16 women) were evaluated. Lund-McKay, Lund Kennedy, and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 scores were assessed for both groups after 8 weeks of treatments. These scores decreased significantly in both groups. However, these scores were significantly lower in the intervention group compared with the placebo group (P < .0001, for all).

Conclusion: The use of N. sativa nasal spray has symptom reliever effect with no adverse effects in patients with CRSsNP.

背景:慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)是一种常见的鼻窦和副鼻窦炎症性疾病,有许多治疗方法可用于治疗此病。近年来,草药对CRS等炎症性疾病显示出显著的影响,其中一种草药是黑草。因此,本研究旨在评价芥蓝在CRS无鼻息肉(CRSsNP)患者中的疗效。方法:在这项随机临床试验中,根据纳入标准纳入65例轻至中度CRSsNP患者。患者随机分为干预组和安慰剂组。干预组患者接受2次/天的芥蓝鼻喷雾剂(1 g/天),安慰剂组患者接受2次/天0.65%的氯化钠喷雾剂。结果:干预组31例(男19例,女12例),安慰剂组34例(男18例,女16例)。治疗8周后对两组患者的隆德-麦凯、隆德-肯尼迪和鼻-鼻预后测试-22评分进行评估。两组的得分均显著下降。然而,干预组的这些评分明显低于安慰剂组(P)。结论:在crsssnp患者中,使用苜蓿鼻喷雾剂具有症状缓解作用,无不良反应。
{"title":"Effect of <i>Nigella sativa</i> Nasal Spray on the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without a Nasal Polyp.","authors":"Ahmad Rezaeian,&nbsp;Sanaz Amoushahi Khouzani","doi":"10.1177/2152656718800059","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2152656718800059","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common inflammatory disease of nasal and paranasal sinuses, with many treatment methods available for the management of this disease. Recently, herbal medicines have shown a significant impact on inflammatory diseases such as CRS, and one of these herbal medicines is <i>Nigella sativa</i>. Therefore, the current study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of <i>N. sativa</i> in patients with CRS without nasal polyp (CRSsNP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial, 65 patients with mild to moderate CRSsNP were enrolled based on the inclusion criteria. Patients were divided randomly into 2 parallel groups: intervention and placebo groups. Patients in the intervention group received 2 puffs/day of <i>N. sativa</i> nasal spray (1 g/day of <i>N. sativa</i>) and in the placebo group received 2 puffs/day of sodium chloride spray 0.65%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one patients (19 men and 12 women) in the intervention group and 34 in the placebo group (18 men and 16 women) were evaluated. Lund-McKay, Lund Kennedy, and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 scores were assessed for both groups after 8 weeks of treatments. These scores decreased significantly in both groups. However, these scores were significantly lower in the intervention group compared with the placebo group (<i>P</i> < .0001, for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of <i>N. sativa</i> nasal spray has symptom reliever effect with no adverse effects in patients with CRSsNP.</p>","PeriodicalId":45192,"journal":{"name":"Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2018-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2152656718800059","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36614320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Pediatric Meningoencephaloceles Endoscopic Endonasal Repair: Our Experience. 小儿脑膜脑膨出鼻内窥镜修复:我们的经验。
IF 2.2 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2018-10-01 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/2152656718802408
Hetal K Marfatia, Kartik A Parelkar, Adhara Chakraborty, Shampa Mishra

Background: Pediatric patients presenting with a nasal mass is uncommon and a high index of suspicion for it to be a meningoencephalocele is essential. Majority of these are congenital and require early intervention owing to the risk of meningitis. Surgery in these cases is very challenging because of the risk of anesthesia and limited space.

Objective: This study aimed to describe our technique and experience in managing pediatric meningoencephaloceles.

Methods: A retrospective study of 19 pediatric patients (age ranging from 40-day-old infants to 11.5-year-old children) was conducted at our tertiary care center from January 2012 to February 2017. Patients presenting with an intranasal meningoencephalocele were treated by endoscopic approach, using otological microinstruments. After detailed imaging and clinical evaluation, a tailored repair, using fat/fascia/cartilage, a multilayer closure, was carried out in all cases.

Results: All patients had a successful repair and recovery, except for one death following an episode of convulsion. There was a minor circumferential narrowing of the nasal vestibule and synechia formation in 2 of our cases.

Conclusion: Transnasal endoscopic repair of meningoencephalocele is minimally invasive. It avoids permanent anosmia and is cosmetic. A combination of miniaturized instruments and a 4-mm 0° nasal endoscope gives excellent visual field and an adequate working space. Owing to the larger defects in congenital meningoencephaloceles, a multilayer repair provides excellent outcomes.

背景:以鼻肿块为表现的儿科患者并不常见,对其是否为脑膜膨出的高度怀疑是必要的。其中大多数是先天性的,由于有脑膜炎的危险,需要早期干预。由于麻醉的风险和有限的空间,手术在这些情况下是非常具有挑战性的。目的:本研究旨在描述我们治疗小儿脑膜脑膨出的技术和经验。方法:对2012年1月至2017年2月在我院三级保健中心就诊的19例儿童患者(年龄从40日龄婴儿到11.5岁儿童)进行回顾性研究。以鼻内脑膜脑膨出为表现的患者采用内窥镜入路,使用耳科显微仪器进行治疗。在详细的影像学和临床评估后,所有病例都进行了量身定制的修复,使用脂肪/筋膜/软骨,多层闭合。结果:除1例惊厥发作后死亡外,所有患者均成功修复和恢复。在我们的病例中,有2例鼻前庭有轻微的周向狭窄和粘连形成。结论:经鼻内镜修复脑膜脑膨出具有微创性。它避免了永久性嗅觉缺失,是一种美容。微型仪器和4毫米0°鼻内窥镜的组合提供了良好的视野和足够的工作空间。由于先天性脑膜脑膨出的缺陷较大,多层修复提供了良好的效果。
{"title":"Pediatric Meningoencephaloceles Endoscopic Endonasal Repair: Our Experience.","authors":"Hetal K Marfatia,&nbsp;Kartik A Parelkar,&nbsp;Adhara Chakraborty,&nbsp;Shampa Mishra","doi":"10.1177/2152656718802408","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2152656718802408","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric patients presenting with a nasal mass is uncommon and a high index of suspicion for it to be a meningoencephalocele is essential. Majority of these are congenital and require early intervention owing to the risk of meningitis. Surgery in these cases is very challenging because of the risk of anesthesia and limited space.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to describe our technique and experience in managing pediatric meningoencephaloceles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 19 pediatric patients (age ranging from 40-day-old infants to 11.5-year-old children) was conducted at our tertiary care center from January 2012 to February 2017. Patients presenting with an intranasal meningoencephalocele were treated by endoscopic approach, using otological microinstruments. After detailed imaging and clinical evaluation, a tailored repair, using fat/fascia/cartilage, a multilayer closure, was carried out in all cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients had a successful repair and recovery, except for one death following an episode of convulsion. There was a minor circumferential narrowing of the nasal vestibule and synechia formation in 2 of our cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transnasal endoscopic repair of meningoencephalocele is minimally invasive. It avoids permanent anosmia and is cosmetic. A combination of miniaturized instruments and a 4-mm 0° nasal endoscope gives excellent visual field and an adequate working space. Owing to the larger defects in congenital meningoencephaloceles, a multilayer repair provides excellent outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":45192,"journal":{"name":"Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2152656718802408","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36600035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Erratum. 勘误表。
IF 2.2 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2018-10-01 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/2152656718806726

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1177/2152656718783630.].

[更正文章DOI: 10.1177/2152656718783630.]。
{"title":"Erratum.","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/2152656718806726","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2152656718806726","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1177/2152656718783630.].</p>","PeriodicalId":45192,"journal":{"name":"Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2152656718806726","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36600036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Low Potency of Indian Dust Mite Allergen Skin Prick Test Extracts Compared to FDA-Approved Extracts: A Double-Blinded Randomized Control Trial. 与fda批准的提取物相比,印度尘螨过敏原皮肤点刺试验提取物的低效力:一项双盲随机对照试验。
IF 2.2 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2018-09-25 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/2152656718796746
Devasahayam J Christopher, Narmada Ashok, Aruna Ravivarma, Deepa Shankar, Erik Peterson, Phuong T Dinh, P K Vedanthan

Background: Skin prick testing is the most important diagnostic tool to detect immunoglobulin E-mediated allergic diseases. With increase in the number of allergy tests performed in India, it is imperative to know the potency of indigenous extracts in comparison with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (USFDA)-approved extracts.

Methods: A randomized comparison trial of Indian manufactured and USFDA-approved extracts of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP) and Dermatophagoides farinae (DF) was done at Christian Medical College & Hospital, Vellore, India from April 2014 to June 2015, to compare the skin test reactivity of indigenous allergen extracts of dust mites against validated allergen. Study enrollment included 197 patients with allergic disorders that showed sensitivity to dust mite during routine allergy skin testing. Study participants were tested with varying dilutions of DP and DF indigenous extracts along with USFDA-approved allergens in a blinded fashion. Results were recorded, and statistical significance was calculated using the Friedman rank sum test.

Results: Using the Friedman rank sum test with a Tukey adjustment for multiple comparisons, we found that the extracts in each dilution were significantly different (P < .0001). The full strength indigenous extracts, B-DF (DF allergen standard extract from Bioproducts and Diagnostics, India) and C-DF (DF allergen extract from Creative Diagnostics, India) extracts, had mean wheal sizes of 7.69 (standard deviation [SD] 9.91) and 31.01(SD 51.04), respectively. The full strength S-DF (DF allergen extract from Jubilant Hollister Stier, Spokane, WA, USA) had a mean wheal size of 109.97 (SD 162.73), which was significantly higher (P < .0001) than both the indigenous extracts. For each of the dilutions, the S-DF mean wheal size was significantly greater than that of the corresponding B-DF and C-DF wheal sizes. The full strength indigenous C-DP (DP allergen extract from Creative Diagnostics, India) had mean wheal size of 39.37 (SD 51.74). The full strength standard S-DP (DP allergen extract from Jubilant Hollister Stier, Spokane, WA, USA) extract had a mean wheal size of 167.66 (SD 270.80), which was significantly higher (P < .0001) than the indigenous C-DP extract. Similar differences were seen across all dilutions.

Conclusion: The indigenous extracts have significantly lower potency compared to USFDA-approved extracts; hence, there is an urgent need for policy makers to institute stringent criteria for standardization of antigens in India.

背景:皮肤点刺试验是检测免疫球蛋白e介导的变应性疾病最重要的诊断工具。随着在印度进行的过敏测试数量的增加,有必要了解本土提取物与美国食品和药物管理局(USFDA)批准的提取物的效力。方法:2014年4月至2015年6月,在印度Vellore基督教医学院和医院,对印度生产的和美国fda批准的Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP)和Dermatophagoides farinae (DF)提取物进行随机比较试验,比较土产尘螨过敏原提取物与验证过敏原的皮肤试验反应性。研究纳入了197例在常规过敏皮肤试验中对尘螨敏感的过敏性疾病患者。研究参与者用不同稀释度的DP和DF本土提取物以及美国食品和药物管理局批准的过敏原进行盲法测试。记录结果,采用Friedman秩和检验计算统计显著性。结果:采用多重比较的弗里德曼秩和检验和Tukey调整,我们发现不同稀释度的提取物具有显著差异(P P P P结论:本土提取物的效价明显低于美国fda批准的提取物;因此,决策者迫切需要在印度制定严格的抗原标准化标准。
{"title":"Low Potency of Indian Dust Mite Allergen Skin Prick Test Extracts Compared to FDA-Approved Extracts: A Double-Blinded Randomized Control Trial.","authors":"Devasahayam J Christopher,&nbsp;Narmada Ashok,&nbsp;Aruna Ravivarma,&nbsp;Deepa Shankar,&nbsp;Erik Peterson,&nbsp;Phuong T Dinh,&nbsp;P K Vedanthan","doi":"10.1177/2152656718796746","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2152656718796746","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Skin prick testing is the most important diagnostic tool to detect immunoglobulin E-mediated allergic diseases. With increase in the number of allergy tests performed in India, it is imperative to know the potency of indigenous extracts in comparison with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (USFDA)-approved extracts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized comparison trial of Indian manufactured and USFDA-approved extracts of <i>Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus</i> (DP) and Dermatophagoides <i>farinae</i> (DF) was done at Christian Medical College & Hospital, Vellore, India from April 2014 to June 2015, to compare the skin test reactivity of indigenous allergen extracts of dust mites against validated allergen. Study enrollment included 197 patients with allergic disorders that showed sensitivity to dust mite during routine allergy skin testing. Study participants were tested with varying dilutions of DP and DF indigenous extracts along with USFDA-approved allergens in a blinded fashion. Results were recorded, and statistical significance was calculated using the Friedman rank sum test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the Friedman rank sum test with a Tukey adjustment for multiple comparisons, we found that the extracts in each dilution were significantly different (<i>P</i> < .0001). The full strength indigenous extracts, B-DF (DF allergen standard extract from Bioproducts and Diagnostics, India) and C-DF (DF allergen extract from Creative Diagnostics, India) extracts, had mean wheal sizes of 7.69 (standard deviation [SD] 9.91) and 31.01(SD 51.04), respectively. The full strength S-DF (DF allergen extract from Jubilant Hollister Stier, Spokane, WA, USA) had a mean wheal size of 109.97 (SD 162.73), which was significantly higher (<i>P</i> < .0001) than both the indigenous extracts. For each of the dilutions, the S-DF mean wheal size was significantly greater than that of the corresponding B-DF and C-DF wheal sizes. The full strength indigenous C-DP (DP allergen extract from Creative Diagnostics, India) had mean wheal size of 39.37 (SD 51.74). The full strength standard S-DP (DP allergen extract from Jubilant Hollister Stier, Spokane, WA, USA) extract had a mean wheal size of 167.66 (SD 270.80), which was significantly higher (<i>P</i> < .0001) than the indigenous C-DP extract. Similar differences were seen across all dilutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The indigenous extracts have significantly lower potency compared to USFDA-approved extracts; hence, there is an urgent need for policy makers to institute stringent criteria for standardization of antigens in India.</p>","PeriodicalId":45192,"journal":{"name":"Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2018-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2152656718796746","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36531871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Effects of Exposure to New Car Interiors in Patients With Asthma and Allergic Rhinitis. 接触新车内饰对哮喘和变应性鼻炎患者的影响。
IF 2.2 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2018-09-18 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/2152656718800060
Amber N Pepper, Adeeb Bulkhi, Catherine R Smith, Matthias Colli, Karl-Christian Bergmann, Torsten Zuberbier, Thomas B Casale

Rationale: Vehicle interiors are an important microenvironment for atopic subjects. This study evaluated the subjective and objective physiologic and clinical effects of exposing subjects with asthma and allergic rhinitis to new 2017 Mercedes vehicles during 90-minute rides.

Methods: Ten adult asthmatics with allergic rhinitis were assessed before and 45 and 90 minutes into rides in a 2017 Mercedes-Benz S-Class sedan and GLE-Class SUV on 2 separate days. Assessments included spirometry, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, peak nasal inspiratory flow, asthma symptom scores, and physical examinations.

Results: Of the 10 subjects, 6 were women, mean age was 32 years, and 6 and 4 were using chronic asthma controllers or intranasal corticosteroids, respectively. None of the subjects had worsening of asthma or rhinitis symptoms during the rides. There were no statistically significant changes from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second, forced expiratory volume in 1 second:forced vital capacity ratio, forced expiratory flow at 25%-75% of vital capacity, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, or peak nasal inspiratory flow at 45 or 90 minutes into the rides with either Mercedes vehicle (all P values > .1 using generalized linear mixed model).

Conclusion: The interior environment of the tested Mercedes vehicles did not cause changes in subjective or objective measures of asthma and allergic rhinitis. We suggest that this model system can be used to test other vehicles for putatively adverse effects on patients with allergic respiratory disorders.

理由:车辆内部是一个重要的微环境的特应性科目。本研究评估了哮喘和过敏性鼻炎患者在90分钟的骑行中对2017年新款梅赛德斯汽车的主客观生理和临床影响。方法:对10名患有变应性鼻炎的成人哮喘患者分别在2天内乘坐2017年奔驰s级轿车和gle级SUV前、45分钟和90分钟进行评估。评估包括肺活量测定、呼出一氧化氮分数、鼻吸气流量峰值、哮喘症状评分和体格检查。结果:10名受试者中,6名为女性,平均年龄为32岁,分别有6名和4名使用慢性哮喘控制剂或鼻内皮质类固醇。在骑行期间,没有受试者出现哮喘或鼻炎症状恶化的情况。与基线相比,1秒用力呼气量、1秒用力呼气量、用力肺活量比、用力肺活量25%-75%时的用力呼气流量、一氧化氮呼气分数或乘坐任一辆奔驰车45分钟或90分钟时的鼻吸气流量峰值无统计学意义变化(均P值>)。1采用广义线性混合模型)。结论:奔驰汽车内部环境对哮喘和变应性鼻炎的主客观指标均无影响。我们建议,该模型系统可用于测试其他载体对过敏性呼吸系统疾病患者的推定不良影响。
{"title":"Effects of Exposure to New Car Interiors in Patients With Asthma and Allergic Rhinitis.","authors":"Amber N Pepper,&nbsp;Adeeb Bulkhi,&nbsp;Catherine R Smith,&nbsp;Matthias Colli,&nbsp;Karl-Christian Bergmann,&nbsp;Torsten Zuberbier,&nbsp;Thomas B Casale","doi":"10.1177/2152656718800060","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2152656718800060","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Vehicle interiors are an important microenvironment for atopic subjects. This study evaluated the subjective and objective physiologic and clinical effects of exposing subjects with asthma and allergic rhinitis to new 2017 Mercedes vehicles during 90-minute rides.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten adult asthmatics with allergic rhinitis were assessed before and 45 and 90 minutes into rides in a 2017 Mercedes-Benz S-Class sedan and GLE-Class SUV on 2 separate days. Assessments included spirometry, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, peak nasal inspiratory flow, asthma symptom scores, and physical examinations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 10 subjects, 6 were women, mean age was 32 years, and 6 and 4 were using chronic asthma controllers or intranasal corticosteroids, respectively. None of the subjects had worsening of asthma or rhinitis symptoms during the rides. There were no statistically significant changes from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second, forced expiratory volume in 1 second:forced vital capacity ratio, forced expiratory flow at 25%-75% of vital capacity, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, or peak nasal inspiratory flow at 45 or 90 minutes into the rides with either Mercedes vehicle (all <i>P</i> values > .1 using generalized linear mixed model).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The interior environment of the tested Mercedes vehicles did not cause changes in subjective or objective measures of asthma and allergic rhinitis. We suggest that this model system can be used to test other vehicles for putatively adverse effects on patients with allergic respiratory disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":45192,"journal":{"name":"Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2018-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2152656718800060","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36514137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Rhinolithiasis: A Misleading Entity. 鼻石症:一个误导的实体。
IF 2.2 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2018-09-12 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/2152656718783596
Hayat Adib, Mohamad Ali El Natout, Georges Zaytoun, Usamah Al Hadi

Introduction: Rhinolithiasis is a rare entity; it entails a stone located in the nasal cavity. The entity presents with different signs and symptoms that can be easily confused with other more common clinical entities such as chronic rhinosinusitis. However, it can also mimic sinonasal tumors, making its proper diagnosis crucial.

Materials and methods: In this article, we present a case series of 15 patients over the past 13 years between 2002 and 2015 who were seen in the clinics at the American University of Beirut Medical Center. We will shed light on the common presenting symptoms, physical examination findings, proper diagnostic modalities, and treatment options. Our data will be compared to the literature.

Conclusion: Rhinolithiasis could present with a wide spectrum of signs and symptoms and could be overlooked or mistaken for other diagnosis such as sinusitis or malignancy. It could be differentiated from other entities by rigid nasal endoscopy and computed tomography scan. The diagnosis of rhinolithiasis requires a high index of suspicion.

鼻石症是一种罕见的疾病;它需要一个位于鼻腔的结石。该实体表现出不同的体征和症状,很容易与其他更常见的临床实体(如慢性鼻窦炎)混淆。然而,它也可以模拟鼻窦肿瘤,使其正确诊断至关重要。材料和方法:在本文中,我们介绍了2002年至2015年间在贝鲁特美国大学医学中心诊所就诊的15例患者的病例系列。我们将阐明常见的表现症状、体检结果、正确的诊断方式和治疗方案。我们的数据将与文献进行比较。结论:鼻结石可表现出广泛的体征和症状,可能被忽视或误认为其他诊断,如鼻窦炎或恶性肿瘤。通过刚性鼻内窥镜和计算机断层扫描可将其与其他实体区分开来。鼻结石的诊断需要高度的怀疑。
{"title":"Rhinolithiasis: A Misleading Entity.","authors":"Hayat Adib,&nbsp;Mohamad Ali El Natout,&nbsp;Georges Zaytoun,&nbsp;Usamah Al Hadi","doi":"10.1177/2152656718783596","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2152656718783596","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rhinolithiasis is a rare entity; it entails a stone located in the nasal cavity. The entity presents with different signs and symptoms that can be easily confused with other more common clinical entities such as chronic rhinosinusitis. However, it can also mimic sinonasal tumors, making its proper diagnosis crucial.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this article, we present a case series of 15 patients over the past 13 years between 2002 and 2015 who were seen in the clinics at the American University of Beirut Medical Center. We will shed light on the common presenting symptoms, physical examination findings, proper diagnostic modalities, and treatment options. Our data will be compared to the literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rhinolithiasis could present with a wide spectrum of signs and symptoms and could be overlooked or mistaken for other diagnosis such as sinusitis or malignancy. It could be differentiated from other entities by rigid nasal endoscopy and computed tomography scan. The diagnosis of rhinolithiasis requires a high index of suspicion.</p>","PeriodicalId":45192,"journal":{"name":"Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2018-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2152656718783596","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36503454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Corrigendum. 勘误表。
IF 2.2 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2018-08-22 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/2152656718797803

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1177/2152656718783599.].

[这更正了文章DOI: 10.1177/2152656718783599.]。
{"title":"Corrigendum.","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/2152656718797803","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2152656718797803","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1177/2152656718783599.].</p>","PeriodicalId":45192,"journal":{"name":"Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2018-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2152656718797803","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36435494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Allergy & Rhinology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1