Pub Date : 2025-09-26DOI: 10.3390/clinpract15100177
Anca Daniela Brăila, Viorica Tudor, Cristian-Viorel Poalelungi, Constantin Marian Damian, Claudia Florina Bogdan-Andreescu, Alexandru Burcea, Andreea-Mariana Bănățeanu, Emin Cadar, Cristina-Crenguţa Albu
Background: Endometrial proliferative lesions are common in the menopausal transition and carry a measurable risk of carcinoma. Early risk stratification may guide evaluation and follow-up. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective study of 315 women aged 45-55 years (May 2021-May 2024) at a private clinic in Bucharest. Lesions were classified per WHO 2014 as hyperplasia without atypia, atypical hyperplasia/endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (AH/EIN), or adenocarcinoma; "advanced pathology" was defined as AH/EIN or adenocarcinoma. Clinical comorbidities and transvaginal ultrasound endometrial thickness were recorded. Associations were tested with χ2; odds were estimated with multivariable logistic regression (adjusted ORs), with a modified Poisson sensitivity analysis for adjusted relative risk. Thickness differences were compared by one-way ANOVA, and severity correlations by Spearman's ρ. Internal validation used 1000-bootstrap resampling. Results: Hyperplasia without atypia comprised 74.6% of cases, AH/EIN 20.0%, and adenocarcinoma 5.4% (advanced pathology 25.4%). Diabetes was independently associated with advanced pathology (aOR 2.75; 95% CI 1.14-6.61; p = 0.0237), while a history of non-atypical hyperplasia was inversely associated (aOR 0.31; 95% CI 0.13-0.72; p = 0.0068). Obesity showed a borderline association (aOR 1.79; 95% CI 0.98-3.26; p = 0.058), and long-term oral contraceptive use also approached significance (aOR 0.42; 95% CI 0.18-1.00; p = 0.051). Endometrial thickness increased stepwise with histopathological severity (ANOVA p < 0.0001; η2 = 0.44) and correlated with ordered severity (ρ = 0.634). The multivariable model showed moderate discrimination (AUC 0.68; optimism-corrected 0.66) with acceptable calibration (slope 0.92; Hosmer-Lemeshow p = 0.052) and overall accuracy (Brier 0.18). Conclusions: In perimenopausal abnormal bleeding, metabolic comorbidities-especially diabetes-together with increased endometrial thickness identify women at higher risk of AH/EIN or carcinoma. Histopathology remains the diagnostic reference. The model can aid clinical prioritization but requires external validation and should not be used as the sole basis for decisions.
背景:子宫内膜增生性病变在绝经过渡期是常见的,并且具有可测量的癌风险。早期风险分层可以指导评估和随访。方法:我们在布加勒斯特的一家私人诊所对315名年龄在45-55岁(2021年5月- 2024年5月)的女性进行了一项单中心回顾性研究。2014年WHO将病变分类为无异型增生、非典型增生/子宫内膜上皮内瘤变(AH/EIN)或腺癌;“晚期病理”定义为AH/EIN或腺癌。记录临床合并症及经阴道超声检查子宫内膜厚度。用χ2检验相关性;使用多变量逻辑回归(调整后的ORs)估计odds,并对调整后的相对风险进行了改进的泊松敏感性分析。厚度差异采用单因素方差分析,严重程度相关性采用Spearman ρ。内部验证使用1000次自举重采样。结果:无异型增生占74.6%,AH/EIN占20.0%,腺癌占5.4%(晚期病理占25.4%)。糖尿病与晚期病理独立相关(aOR 2.75; 95% CI 1.14-6.61; p = 0.0237),而非典型增生史与晚期病理独立相关(aOR 0.31; 95% CI 0.13-0.72; p = 0.0068)。肥胖呈临界相关性(aOR 1.79; 95% CI 0.98-3.26; p = 0.058),长期使用口服避孕药也接近显著性(aOR 0.42; 95% CI 0.18-1.00; p = 0.051)。子宫内膜厚度随组织病理严重程度逐渐增加(方差分析p < 0.0001; η2 = 0.44),并与有序严重程度相关(ρ = 0.634)。多变量模型具有中等判别性(AUC 0.68;乐观校正0.66),可接受的校准(斜率0.92;Hosmer-Lemeshow p = 0.052)和总体精度(Brier 0.18)。结论:围绝经期异常出血、代谢性合并症(尤其是糖尿病)以及子宫内膜厚度增加是AH/EIN或癌的高危女性。组织病理学仍然是诊断参考。该模型可以帮助临床优先排序,但需要外部验证,不应作为决策的唯一依据。
{"title":"Clinical and Histopathological Correlates of Endometrial Proliferative Lesions in Perimenopausal Women: A Retrospective Study with Internal Validation of a Risk Model.","authors":"Anca Daniela Brăila, Viorica Tudor, Cristian-Viorel Poalelungi, Constantin Marian Damian, Claudia Florina Bogdan-Andreescu, Alexandru Burcea, Andreea-Mariana Bănățeanu, Emin Cadar, Cristina-Crenguţa Albu","doi":"10.3390/clinpract15100177","DOIUrl":"10.3390/clinpract15100177","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Endometrial proliferative lesions are common in the menopausal transition and carry a measurable risk of carcinoma. Early risk stratification may guide evaluation and follow-up. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a single-center retrospective study of 315 women aged 45-55 years (May 2021-May 2024) at a private clinic in Bucharest. Lesions were classified per WHO 2014 as hyperplasia without atypia, atypical hyperplasia/endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (AH/EIN), or adenocarcinoma; \"advanced pathology\" was defined as AH/EIN or adenocarcinoma. Clinical comorbidities and transvaginal ultrasound endometrial thickness were recorded. Associations were tested with χ<sup>2</sup>; odds were estimated with multivariable logistic regression (adjusted ORs), with a modified Poisson sensitivity analysis for adjusted relative risk. Thickness differences were compared by one-way ANOVA, and severity correlations by Spearman's ρ. Internal validation used 1000-bootstrap resampling. <b>Results:</b> Hyperplasia without atypia comprised 74.6% of cases, AH/EIN 20.0%, and adenocarcinoma 5.4% (advanced pathology 25.4%). Diabetes was independently associated with advanced pathology (aOR 2.75; 95% CI 1.14-6.61; <i>p</i> = 0.0237), while a history of non-atypical hyperplasia was inversely associated (aOR 0.31; 95% CI 0.13-0.72; <i>p</i> = 0.0068). Obesity showed a borderline association (aOR 1.79; 95% CI 0.98-3.26; <i>p</i> = 0.058), and long-term oral contraceptive use also approached significance (aOR 0.42; 95% CI 0.18-1.00; <i>p</i> = 0.051). Endometrial thickness increased stepwise with histopathological severity (ANOVA <i>p</i> < 0.0001; η<sup>2</sup> = 0.44) and correlated with ordered severity (ρ = 0.634). The multivariable model showed moderate discrimination (AUC 0.68; optimism-corrected 0.66) with acceptable calibration (slope 0.92; Hosmer-Lemeshow <i>p</i> = 0.052) and overall accuracy (Brier 0.18). <b>Conclusions:</b> In perimenopausal abnormal bleeding, metabolic comorbidities-especially diabetes-together with increased endometrial thickness identify women at higher risk of AH/EIN or carcinoma. Histopathology remains the diagnostic reference. The model can aid clinical prioritization but requires external validation and should not be used as the sole basis for decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12563367/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145394131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-25DOI: 10.3390/clinpract15100176
Ana M Peiró, Noelia Serrano-Gadea, Daniel García-Torres, María Teresa Ruiz-Cantero, Virtudes Pérez-Jover
Background/Objectives: Gender (roles as household load and job strain, and identity) represent an effect modifier of the interference between pain experience and sex because it is different between men and women. This study validates a new scale developed to assess how life functioning is impacted by Chronic Non-Cancer Pain (CNCP) due to gender. Methods: A total of 193 Spanish ambulatory CNCP patients (60 [51-73] years old, 69.4% women, 31% retired) were interviewed. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) yielded 3-factor structure: Gender Self-identity, Roles, and Chronic Pain Impact on Social, Familial, Work and Sexual Life. Results: The Gender-Pain Questionnaire, with the presented factor structure, is an evaluation instrument with enough reliability and internal validity for CNCP patients. Conclusions: This study presents the psychometric properties of a scale for assessing the interference of CNCP patients' experience on gender and how it affects their daily life activities, relationships and self-identity. It represents the first original questionnaire known in Spanish language to date. This measure could potentially help researchers and clinicians to obtain gender key information to design appropriate and equity healthcare interventions.
{"title":"Gender-Pain Questionnaire: Internal Validation of a Scale for Assessing the Influence of Chronic Pain Experience on Gender Identity and Roles.","authors":"Ana M Peiró, Noelia Serrano-Gadea, Daniel García-Torres, María Teresa Ruiz-Cantero, Virtudes Pérez-Jover","doi":"10.3390/clinpract15100176","DOIUrl":"10.3390/clinpract15100176","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Gender (roles as household load and job strain, and identity) represent an effect modifier of the interference between pain experience and sex because it is different between men and women. This study validates a new scale developed to assess how life functioning is impacted by Chronic Non-Cancer Pain (CNCP) due to gender. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 193 Spanish ambulatory CNCP patients (60 [51-73] years old, 69.4% women, 31% retired) were interviewed. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) yielded 3-factor structure: Gender Self-identity, Roles, and Chronic Pain Impact on Social, Familial, Work and Sexual Life. <b>Results:</b> The Gender-Pain Questionnaire, with the presented factor structure, is an evaluation instrument with enough reliability and internal validity for CNCP patients. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study presents the psychometric properties of a scale for assessing the interference of CNCP patients' experience on gender and how it affects their daily life activities, relationships and self-identity. It represents the first original questionnaire known in Spanish language to date. This measure could potentially help researchers and clinicians to obtain gender key information to design appropriate and equity healthcare interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12563697/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145393562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-24DOI: 10.3390/clinpract15100174
Alessandra Tortorella, Alessio Marinelli, Luigi De Maria, Silvano Dragonieri, Giuseppe Del Vecchio, Vitaliano Nicola Quaranta, Andrea Portacci, Giovanna Elisiana Carpagnano, Luigi Vimercati
Background: Themanagement of occupational respiratory diseases (ORDs) requires a multidisciplinary approach, yet collaboration between pulmonologists and occupational physicians is often fragmented, potentially compromising patient outcomes. This study aimed to systematically compare the management strategies for ORDs between these two specialties in Italy to identify gaps and opportunities for integration. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a structured 12-item questionnaire distributed to board-certified pulmonologists and occupational physicians across Italy. The questionnaire assessed diagnostic pathways, therapeutic strategies, preventive measures, and patterns of interdisciplinary collaboration. A total of 102 specialists (51 pulmonologists and 51 occupational physicians) completed the survey. Comparative analyses were performed using Pearson's χ2 tests. Results: Significant divergences in practice were identified. Pulmonologists primarily focused on clinical diagnosis, utilizing pulmonary function tests (34.3%) and imaging (11.8%), and favored pharmacotherapy (27.5%) as the first-line treatment, in alignment with clinical guidelines. Conversely, occupational physicians prioritized detailed occupational and exposure histories (15.7%) and preventive interventions aimed at exposure reduction (15.7%). While both groups acknowledged the importance of collaboration, a substantial number reported that it occurred only occasionally (17.6% of pulmonologists and 12.7% of occupational physicians), indicating a significant gap in integrated care. Shared barriers included poor patient adherence and limited access to advanced diagnostic tools. Conclusions: While sharing a common foundation in diagnostic and preventive principles, pulmonologists and occupational physicians in Italy operate with distinct, complementary approaches that remain insufficiently integrated. The observed fragmentation in diagnostic and therapeutic pathways underscores an urgent need for shared national guidelines, structured interdisciplinary training, and formalized communication protocols. Bridging this disciplinary divide is essential to delivering holistic care, optimizing worker health, and preserving work ability.
{"title":"Bridging Gaps in Occupational Respiratory Disease Management: A Comparative Survey of Pulmonologists and Occupational Physicians in Italy.","authors":"Alessandra Tortorella, Alessio Marinelli, Luigi De Maria, Silvano Dragonieri, Giuseppe Del Vecchio, Vitaliano Nicola Quaranta, Andrea Portacci, Giovanna Elisiana Carpagnano, Luigi Vimercati","doi":"10.3390/clinpract15100174","DOIUrl":"10.3390/clinpract15100174","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Themanagement of occupational respiratory diseases (ORDs) requires a multidisciplinary approach, yet collaboration between pulmonologists and occupational physicians is often fragmented, potentially compromising patient outcomes. This study aimed to systematically compare the management strategies for ORDs between these two specialties in Italy to identify gaps and opportunities for integration. <b>Methods</b>: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a structured 12-item questionnaire distributed to board-certified pulmonologists and occupational physicians across Italy. The questionnaire assessed diagnostic pathways, therapeutic strategies, preventive measures, and patterns of interdisciplinary collaboration. A total of 102 specialists (51 pulmonologists and 51 occupational physicians) completed the survey. Comparative analyses were performed using Pearson's χ2 tests. <b>Results</b>: Significant divergences in practice were identified. Pulmonologists primarily focused on clinical diagnosis, utilizing pulmonary function tests (34.3%) and imaging (11.8%), and favored pharmacotherapy (27.5%) as the first-line treatment, in alignment with clinical guidelines. Conversely, occupational physicians prioritized detailed occupational and exposure histories (15.7%) and preventive interventions aimed at exposure reduction (15.7%). While both groups acknowledged the importance of collaboration, a substantial number reported that it occurred only occasionally (17.6% of pulmonologists and 12.7% of occupational physicians), indicating a significant gap in integrated care. Shared barriers included poor patient adherence and limited access to advanced diagnostic tools. <b>Conclusions</b>: While sharing a common foundation in diagnostic and preventive principles, pulmonologists and occupational physicians in Italy operate with distinct, complementary approaches that remain insufficiently integrated. The observed fragmentation in diagnostic and therapeutic pathways underscores an urgent need for shared national guidelines, structured interdisciplinary training, and formalized communication protocols. Bridging this disciplinary divide is essential to delivering holistic care, optimizing worker health, and preserving work ability.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12564289/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145393986","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-24DOI: 10.3390/clinpract15100175
Sarah M Alyousif, Naif K Alaqil, Mohamad Abdelshafy, Turki Alasmari, Naif H Alqadhy, Nawaf S Alzahrani, Mohammed A Alhefdhi, Nawaf A Alqahtani, Aamir Omair, Ahmed Alsaileek
Background/Objectives: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains a major global health burden. Sacubitril/valsartan, an angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), improves outcomes in HFrEF but may cause hyperkalemia. Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at King Abdulaziz Cardiac Center, Riyadh, including 238 HFrEF patients initiated on sacubitril/valsartan (2016-2021). Potassium levels were assessed pre-initiation and at 0-3, 3-6, and 6-12 months post-initiation. Hyperkalemia was analyzed at thresholds >5.0, >5.5, and >6.0 mmol/L. Results: Median age was 58 years (IQR 48-69); 75.2% were male. Hyperkalemia >5.0 mmol/L occurred in 44.4% (95% CI: 38.1-51.0) within three months post-initiation versus 8.2% (95% CI: 5.3-12.4) pre-initiation. Only 17.3% exceeded 5.5 mmol/L. Treatment discontinuation occurred in 7.1% of patients, with 1.3% stopping due to clinically significant hyperkalemia. McNemar's test confirmed a significant increase in prevalence across time points (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Despite increased hyperkalemia incidence, discontinuation rates were low, consistent with prior trials (PARADIGM-HF, PARAGON-HF). Sacubitril/valsartan remains an effective and generally safe therapy for HFrEF, with hyperkalemia manageable through monitoring. Limitations include missing potassium data, potential confounding factors, and the lack of a control group; future prospective studies with regular electrolyte monitoring are recommended.
{"title":"Hyperkalemia in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction Patients Treated with Sacubitril/Valsartan: Experience from a Tertiary Cardiac Center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Sarah M Alyousif, Naif K Alaqil, Mohamad Abdelshafy, Turki Alasmari, Naif H Alqadhy, Nawaf S Alzahrani, Mohammed A Alhefdhi, Nawaf A Alqahtani, Aamir Omair, Ahmed Alsaileek","doi":"10.3390/clinpract15100175","DOIUrl":"10.3390/clinpract15100175","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains a major global health burden. Sacubitril/valsartan, an angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), improves outcomes in HFrEF but may cause hyperkalemia. <b>Methods</b>: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at King Abdulaziz Cardiac Center, Riyadh, including 238 HFrEF patients initiated on sacubitril/valsartan (2016-2021). Potassium levels were assessed pre-initiation and at 0-3, 3-6, and 6-12 months post-initiation. Hyperkalemia was analyzed at thresholds >5.0, >5.5, and >6.0 mmol/L. <b>Results</b>: Median age was 58 years (IQR 48-69); 75.2% were male. Hyperkalemia >5.0 mmol/L occurred in 44.4% (95% CI: 38.1-51.0) within three months post-initiation versus 8.2% (95% CI: 5.3-12.4) pre-initiation. Only 17.3% exceeded 5.5 mmol/L. Treatment discontinuation occurred in 7.1% of patients, with 1.3% stopping due to clinically significant hyperkalemia. McNemar's test confirmed a significant increase in prevalence across time points (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). <b>Conclusions</b>: Despite increased hyperkalemia incidence, discontinuation rates were low, consistent with prior trials (PARADIGM-HF, PARAGON-HF). Sacubitril/valsartan remains an effective and generally safe therapy for HFrEF, with hyperkalemia manageable through monitoring. Limitations include missing potassium data, potential confounding factors, and the lack of a control group; future prospective studies with regular electrolyte monitoring are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12564713/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145393563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-23DOI: 10.3390/clinpract15100173
Nidha Shapoo, Abdul Rehman, Carlos Izaguirre-Rojas, Vladimir Gotlieb, Noella Boma
Cancer pain remains a significant challenge in oncology, profoundly affecting patients' quality of life, function, and prognosis. Historically under-recognized and managed with a uniform, opioid-centric approach, cancer pain was often inadequately treated. Advances in pain assessment, multimodal analgesia, and supportive care have improved outcomes, yet traditional algorithms frequently fail to address the complex, heterogeneous nature of cancer pain. Contemporary management is shifting toward precision and personalized medicine, integrating genetic, molecular, and biomarker data with individual patient characteristics to inform treatment decisions. To address this complexity, we propose a five-domain framework encompassing biological, pharmacologic, psychological, sociocultural, and functional domains. This multidimensional approach enables clinicians to tailor pain management strategies to each patient's unique profile, aiming for equitable and individualized care. However, challenges remain, including tumor and patient heterogeneity, limited biomarker validation, data integration, disparities in access, and the need for multidisciplinary coordination. This review traces the evolution of cancer pain management, highlights the promise of precision and personalized strategies, and presents a comprehensive framework for optimizing pain control in oncology.
{"title":"Cancer Pain Is Not One-Size-Fits-All: Evolving from Tradition to Precision.","authors":"Nidha Shapoo, Abdul Rehman, Carlos Izaguirre-Rojas, Vladimir Gotlieb, Noella Boma","doi":"10.3390/clinpract15100173","DOIUrl":"10.3390/clinpract15100173","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer pain remains a significant challenge in oncology, profoundly affecting patients' quality of life, function, and prognosis. Historically under-recognized and managed with a uniform, opioid-centric approach, cancer pain was often inadequately treated. Advances in pain assessment, multimodal analgesia, and supportive care have improved outcomes, yet traditional algorithms frequently fail to address the complex, heterogeneous nature of cancer pain. Contemporary management is shifting toward precision and personalized medicine, integrating genetic, molecular, and biomarker data with individual patient characteristics to inform treatment decisions. To address this complexity, we propose a five-domain framework encompassing biological, pharmacologic, psychological, sociocultural, and functional domains. This multidimensional approach enables clinicians to tailor pain management strategies to each patient's unique profile, aiming for equitable and individualized care. However, challenges remain, including tumor and patient heterogeneity, limited biomarker validation, data integration, disparities in access, and the need for multidisciplinary coordination. This review traces the evolution of cancer pain management, highlights the promise of precision and personalized strategies, and presents a comprehensive framework for optimizing pain control in oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12563744/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145394094","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-23DOI: 10.3390/clinpract15100172
Ciprian Gîndac, Tamara Mirela Poroșnicu, Nilima Rajpal Kundnani, Nicoleta Sgăvârdea, Claudiu Rafael Bârsac, Vlad Meche, Adelina Băloi, Laura Alexandra Nussbaum, Ovidiu Horea Bedreag, Dorel Săndesc, Marius Păpurică
Introduction: TPE (therapeutic plasma exchange) has proven to be an extremely effective treatment for a range of conditions, especially over the past 20 years. Anticoagulation with heparin is currently the accepted recommendation for therapeutic plasma exchange sessions. However, the hypercoagulable state and hyperviscosity in some patients requiring TPE present a challenge, particularly during the first session, due to an increased risk of circuit clotting. Citrate anticoagulation has been proposed for extracorporeal therapies such as hemodiafiltration where heparin is contraindicated. Nevertheless, citrate anticoagulation is still generally avoided in patients undergoing TPE. Materials and Methods: A total of 26 patients underwent 52 TPE sessions using citrate. Fifteen patients received citrate from the beginning of therapy, accounting for 29 sessions, and eleven patients were switched to citrate after initially starting with heparin, when an imminent risk of circuit clotting quickly became evident-23 sessions in total. The imminent risk of circuit clotting was assessed by a continuous and accelerated increase in transmembrane pressure despite heparin anticoagulation. The effectiveness of citrate anticoagulation and its safety for patients were evaluated. Results: Of the 23 sessions where there was a risk of circuit clotting, citrate was added on top of heparin in those sessions; 21 sessions were successfully completed. It can be said that the kits were saved in these cases. Among the 29 TPE sessions that used citrate from the start, 27 were completed successfully, even though the patients were considered to have a hypercoagulable status. No cases of citrate toxicity were identified. Conclusions: TPE with citrate is a safe option for patients. It can preserve TPE kits from the beginning or during treatment in patients with hypercoagulability. Citrate can be also be used when heparin is contraindicated or ineffective.
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Citrate Anticoagulation in Therapeutic Plasma Exchange: A Clinical Study.","authors":"Ciprian Gîndac, Tamara Mirela Poroșnicu, Nilima Rajpal Kundnani, Nicoleta Sgăvârdea, Claudiu Rafael Bârsac, Vlad Meche, Adelina Băloi, Laura Alexandra Nussbaum, Ovidiu Horea Bedreag, Dorel Săndesc, Marius Păpurică","doi":"10.3390/clinpract15100172","DOIUrl":"10.3390/clinpract15100172","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> TPE (therapeutic plasma exchange) has proven to be an extremely effective treatment for a range of conditions, especially over the past 20 years. Anticoagulation with heparin is currently the accepted recommendation for therapeutic plasma exchange sessions. However, the hypercoagulable state and hyperviscosity in some patients requiring TPE present a challenge, particularly during the first session, due to an increased risk of circuit clotting. Citrate anticoagulation has been proposed for extracorporeal therapies such as hemodiafiltration where heparin is contraindicated. Nevertheless, citrate anticoagulation is still generally avoided in patients undergoing TPE. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A total of 26 patients underwent 52 TPE sessions using citrate. Fifteen patients received citrate from the beginning of therapy, accounting for 29 sessions, and eleven patients were switched to citrate after initially starting with heparin, when an imminent risk of circuit clotting quickly became evident-23 sessions in total. The imminent risk of circuit clotting was assessed by a continuous and accelerated increase in transmembrane pressure despite heparin anticoagulation. The effectiveness of citrate anticoagulation and its safety for patients were evaluated. <b>Results:</b> Of the 23 sessions where there was a risk of circuit clotting, citrate was added on top of heparin in those sessions; 21 sessions were successfully completed. It can be said that the kits were saved in these cases. Among the 29 TPE sessions that used citrate from the start, 27 were completed successfully, even though the patients were considered to have a hypercoagulable status. No cases of citrate toxicity were identified. <b>Conclusions:</b> TPE with citrate is a safe option for patients. It can preserve TPE kits from the beginning or during treatment in patients with hypercoagulability. Citrate can be also be used when heparin is contraindicated or ineffective.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12563097/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145393767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-18DOI: 10.3390/clinpract15090171
Silvia Rojas-Rueda, Nechama S Citrin, Mark Adam Antal, Rene Garcia-Contreras, Carlos A Jurado, Francisco X Azpiazu-Flores
Background: Tongue piercing has gained popularity among teenagers and young adults as a form of self-expression, cultural identity, and fashion. However, patients are often unaware of the harmful effects tongue piercings can have on their oral health. Despite its popularity, this form of body modification carries considerable risk, particularly when performed or maintained without proper care. This review summarizes findings from clinical case reports, observational studies, and previous literature reviews, with a focus on the clinical outcomes of tongue piercings and their appropriate management.
Methods: An internet-based literature review was conducted to evaluate the short- and long-term oral health implications of tongue piercings. Only articles published between January 1990 and April 2025 were included. The databases searched were PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science, using keywords such as "tongue piercing," "oral piercing," "oral complications," and "dental trauma."
Results: The literature revealed that tongue piercings can lead to numerous adverse effects on oral health, including dental fractures, gingival recession, enamel wear, and localized tissue overgrowth, in addition to localized and systemic infections. The presence of foreign objects in the oral cavity, combined with poor oral hygiene, habitual trauma, and long-term contact with oral tissues, often worsens these complications.
Conclusions: The results of this literature review suggest that tongue piercings pose significant and often underestimated risks to oral health. Clinicians should remain vigilant, educate patients on potential complications, and be well-equipped to prevent, monitor, and manage associated dental problems effectively in clinical practice.
背景:舌环作为一种自我表达、文化认同和时尚的形式,在青少年和年轻人中越来越受欢迎。然而,患者往往没有意识到舌孔对口腔健康的有害影响。尽管它很流行,但这种形式的身体改造有相当大的风险,特别是在没有适当护理的情况下进行或维持。本综述总结了临床病例报告、观察性研究和先前文献综述的发现,重点是舌孔的临床结果及其适当处理。方法:以互联网为基础的文献综述,评估舌环对口腔健康的短期和长期影响。只包括1990年1月至2025年4月期间发表的文章。检索的数据库包括PubMed、谷歌Scholar、Scopus和Web of Science,关键词包括“舌环”、“口腔环”、“口腔并发症”和“牙齿创伤”。结果:文献显示,舌孔会对口腔健康造成许多不良影响,包括牙骨折、牙龈萎缩、牙釉质磨损和局部组织过度生长,以及局部和全身感染。口腔内有异物,再加上口腔卫生不良、习惯性创伤和长期与口腔组织接触,往往会使这些并发症恶化。结论:这篇文献综述的结果表明,舌孔对口腔健康造成了显著且经常被低估的风险。临床医生应保持警惕,教育患者潜在的并发症,并做好准备,在临床实践中有效地预防、监测和管理相关的牙科问题。
{"title":"Impact of Tongue Piercings on Oral Health: A Narrative Literature Review.","authors":"Silvia Rojas-Rueda, Nechama S Citrin, Mark Adam Antal, Rene Garcia-Contreras, Carlos A Jurado, Francisco X Azpiazu-Flores","doi":"10.3390/clinpract15090171","DOIUrl":"10.3390/clinpract15090171","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tongue piercing has gained popularity among teenagers and young adults as a form of self-expression, cultural identity, and fashion. However, patients are often unaware of the harmful effects tongue piercings can have on their oral health. Despite its popularity, this form of body modification carries considerable risk, particularly when performed or maintained without proper care. This review summarizes findings from clinical case reports, observational studies, and previous literature reviews, with a focus on the clinical outcomes of tongue piercings and their appropriate management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An internet-based literature review was conducted to evaluate the short- and long-term oral health implications of tongue piercings. Only articles published between January 1990 and April 2025 were included. The databases searched were PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science, using keywords such as \"tongue piercing,\" \"oral piercing,\" \"oral complications,\" and \"dental trauma.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature revealed that tongue piercings can lead to numerous adverse effects on oral health, including dental fractures, gingival recession, enamel wear, and localized tissue overgrowth, in addition to localized and systemic infections. The presence of foreign objects in the oral cavity, combined with poor oral hygiene, habitual trauma, and long-term contact with oral tissues, often worsens these complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this literature review suggest that tongue piercings pose significant and often underestimated risks to oral health. Clinicians should remain vigilant, educate patients on potential complications, and be well-equipped to prevent, monitor, and manage associated dental problems effectively in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468940/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145151255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-17DOI: 10.3390/clinpract15090170
Marco Zeppieri, Roberta Amato, Daniela Catania, Mutali Musa, Alessandro Avitabile, Fabiana D'Esposito, Caterina Gagliano, Matteo Capobianco, Simonetta Gaia Nicolosi
Background: This prospective pilot study included four participants with chronic visual impairment and assessed functional and electrophysiological recovery following visual evoked potential (VEP)-guided auditory biofeedback across diverse etiologies. Low vision affects more than two billion people worldwide and imposes a sustained personal and socioeconomic burden. Conventional rehabilitation emphasizes optical aids and environmental modification without directly stimulating the visual pathway. Emerging evidence indicates that auditory biofeedback based on real-time cortical activity can leverage adult neuroplasticity. Methods: Four men (mean age 58 ± 12 years) with chronic visual impairment attributable to occipital stroke, stage IV macular hole, end-stage open-angle glaucoma, or diabetic maculopathy completed ten 10-min monocular sessions with the Retimax Vision Trainer over three weeks (15 Hz pattern reversal, 90% contrast). Primary end points were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA, ETDRS letters) and P100 amplitude/latency. Fixation stability was recorded with MAIA microperimetry when feasible. A focused PubMed review (2010-2025) mapped current evidence and research gaps. Results: Median BCVA improved by seven letters (IQR 0-15); three of eight eyes gained ≥ 10 letters and none lost vision. Mean P100 amplitude increased from 1.0 ± 1.2 µV to 3.0 ± 1.1 µV, while latency shortened by 3.9 ms. Electrophysiological improvement paralleled behavioural gain irrespective of lesion site. No adverse events occurred. Conclusions: A concise course of VEP-guided auditory biofeedback produced concordant functional and neurophysiological gains across retinal, optic nerve, and cortical pathologies. These pilot data support integration of closed-loop biofeedback into routine low vision care and justify larger sham-controlled trials.
{"title":"Harnessing Visual Neuroplasticity Through Auditory Biofeedback-Functional and Electrophysiological Gains Across Retinal, Optic-Nerve, and Cortical Visual Impairment: A Prospective Pilot Study.","authors":"Marco Zeppieri, Roberta Amato, Daniela Catania, Mutali Musa, Alessandro Avitabile, Fabiana D'Esposito, Caterina Gagliano, Matteo Capobianco, Simonetta Gaia Nicolosi","doi":"10.3390/clinpract15090170","DOIUrl":"10.3390/clinpract15090170","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This prospective pilot study included four participants with chronic visual impairment and assessed functional and electrophysiological recovery following visual evoked potential (VEP)-guided auditory biofeedback across diverse etiologies. Low vision affects more than two billion people worldwide and imposes a sustained personal and socioeconomic burden. Conventional rehabilitation emphasizes optical aids and environmental modification without directly stimulating the visual pathway. Emerging evidence indicates that auditory biofeedback based on real-time cortical activity can leverage adult neuroplasticity. <b>Methods:</b> Four men (mean age 58 ± 12 years) with chronic visual impairment attributable to occipital stroke, stage IV macular hole, end-stage open-angle glaucoma, or diabetic maculopathy completed ten 10-min monocular sessions with the Retimax Vision Trainer over three weeks (15 Hz pattern reversal, 90% contrast). Primary end points were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA, ETDRS letters) and P100 amplitude/latency. Fixation stability was recorded with MAIA microperimetry when feasible. A focused PubMed review (2010-2025) mapped current evidence and research gaps. <b>Results:</b> Median BCVA improved by seven letters (IQR 0-15); three of eight eyes gained ≥ 10 letters and none lost vision. Mean P100 amplitude increased from 1.0 ± 1.2 µV to 3.0 ± 1.1 µV, while latency shortened by 3.9 ms. Electrophysiological improvement paralleled behavioural gain irrespective of lesion site. No adverse events occurred. <b>Conclusions:</b> A concise course of VEP-guided auditory biofeedback produced concordant functional and neurophysiological gains across retinal, optic nerve, and cortical pathologies. These pilot data support integration of closed-loop biofeedback into routine low vision care and justify larger sham-controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468727/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145151282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-16DOI: 10.3390/clinpract15090169
Eren Ogut
Aims/Background: The growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical medicine has opened new possibilities for enhancing diagnostic accuracy, therapeutic decision-making, and biomedical innovation across several domains. This review is aimed to evaluate the clinical applications of AI across five key domains of medicine: diagnostic imaging, clinical decision support systems (CDSS), surgery, pathology, and drug discovery, highlighting achievements, limitations, and future directions. Methods: A comprehensive PubMed search was performed without language or publication date restrictions, combining Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free-text keywords for AI with domain-specific terms. The search yielded 2047 records, of which 243 duplicates were removed, leaving 1804 unique studies. After screening titles and abstracts, 1482 records were excluded due to irrelevance, preclinical scope, or lack of patient-level outcomes. Full-text review of 322 articles led to the exclusion of 172 studies (no clinical validation or outcomes, n = 64; methodological studies, n = 43; preclinical and in vitro-only, n = 39; conference abstracts without peer-reviewed full text, n = 26). Ultimately, 150 studies met inclusion criteria and were analyzed qualitatively. Data extraction focused on study context, AI technique, dataset characteristics, comparator benchmarks, and reported outcomes, such as diagnostic accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), efficiency, and clinical improvements. Results: AI demonstrated strong performance in diagnostic imaging, achieving expert-level accuracy in tasks such as cancer detection (AUC up to 0.94). CDSS showed promise in predicting adverse events (sepsis, atrial fibrillation), though real-world outcome evidence was mixed. In surgery, AI enhanced intraoperative guidance and risk stratification. Pathology benefited from AI-assisted diagnosis and molecular inference from histology. AI also accelerated drug discovery through protein structure prediction and virtual screening. However, challenges included limited explainability, data bias, lack of prospective trials, and regulatory hurdles. Conclusions: AI is transforming clinical medicine, offering improved accuracy, efficiency, and discovery. Yet, its integration into routine care demands rigorous validation, ethical oversight, and human-AI collaboration. Continued interdisciplinary efforts will be essential to translate these innovations into safe and effective patient-centered care.
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Medicine: Challenges Across Diagnostic Imaging, Clinical Decision Support, Surgery, Pathology, and Drug Discovery.","authors":"Eren Ogut","doi":"10.3390/clinpract15090169","DOIUrl":"10.3390/clinpract15090169","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aims/Background:</b> The growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical medicine has opened new possibilities for enhancing diagnostic accuracy, therapeutic decision-making, and biomedical innovation across several domains. This review is aimed to evaluate the clinical applications of AI across five key domains of medicine: diagnostic imaging, clinical decision support systems (CDSS), surgery, pathology, and drug discovery, highlighting achievements, limitations, and future directions. <b>Methods:</b> A comprehensive PubMed search was performed without language or publication date restrictions, combining Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free-text keywords for AI with domain-specific terms. The search yielded 2047 records, of which 243 duplicates were removed, leaving 1804 unique studies. After screening titles and abstracts, 1482 records were excluded due to irrelevance, preclinical scope, or lack of patient-level outcomes. Full-text review of 322 articles led to the exclusion of 172 studies (no clinical validation or outcomes, <i>n</i> = 64; methodological studies, <i>n</i> = 43; preclinical and in vitro-only, <i>n</i> = 39; conference abstracts without peer-reviewed full text, <i>n</i> = 26). Ultimately, 150 studies met inclusion criteria and were analyzed qualitatively. Data extraction focused on study context, AI technique, dataset characteristics, comparator benchmarks, and reported outcomes, such as diagnostic accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), efficiency, and clinical improvements. <b>Results:</b> AI demonstrated strong performance in diagnostic imaging, achieving expert-level accuracy in tasks such as cancer detection (AUC up to 0.94). CDSS showed promise in predicting adverse events (sepsis, atrial fibrillation), though real-world outcome evidence was mixed. In surgery, AI enhanced intraoperative guidance and risk stratification. Pathology benefited from AI-assisted diagnosis and molecular inference from histology. AI also accelerated drug discovery through protein structure prediction and virtual screening. However, challenges included limited explainability, data bias, lack of prospective trials, and regulatory hurdles. <b>Conclusions:</b> AI is transforming clinical medicine, offering improved accuracy, efficiency, and discovery. Yet, its integration into routine care demands rigorous validation, ethical oversight, and human-AI collaboration. Continued interdisciplinary efforts will be essential to translate these innovations into safe and effective patient-centered care.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468291/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145151256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-15DOI: 10.3390/clinpract15090167
Reem A Alsaqer, Ghazal Y Dhaher, Rewa L Alsharif, Razan Y Almleaky, Khalid S Menshawi, Turki M Alqurashi, Abdullah Almaqhawi
Background/Objectives: COVID-19 frequently causes olfactory and gustatory dysfunction, including qualitative disorders like parosmia and phantosmia. These distortions affect quality of life and may result from both peripheral and central neural damage. Despite increasing reports, their prevalence, mechanisms, and risk factors remain unclear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical characteristics and possible predictors of parosmia and phantosmia associated with COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia. Methods: This cross-sectional study utilized an online questionnaire targeting adults in Saudi Arabia with self-reported new-onset olfactory or gustatory dysfunction after COVID-19. Results: Out of 539 participants, 377 were included for analysis. Females slightly outnumbered males (195, 51.7% vs. 182, 48.3%) with a mean age of 34.5 years (SD = 12.7). Comorbidities were present in 86 (23.3%) participants, predominantly including hypertension (39.5%) and diabetes (30.2%). Sudden smell and taste loss were reported by 277 (73.5%) and 267 (70.8%) participants, respectively. Regional residence was significantly associated with both smell (p < 0.001) and taste loss (p < 0.001). Academic qualification exhibited borderline significance in relation to taste loss (p = 0.049). Logistic regression analysis indicated no significant predictors of dysfunction, with male gender exhibiting an odds ratio of 1.276 for smell (p = 0.301) and an odds ratio of 1.401 for taste (p = 0.144). Over 60% of participants experienced a negative impact on their quality of life. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the prevalence of parosmia and phantosmia in COVID-19 patients in Saudi Arabia, with a significant impact on quality of life. While regional differences and education level exhibited certain associations, no demographic or clinical factors independently predicted dysfunction, highlighting the necessity for additional research into underlying mechanisms and long-term effects.
{"title":"Self-Reported Parosmia, Phantosmia, and Gustatory Dysfunction Among Adults with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study in Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Reem A Alsaqer, Ghazal Y Dhaher, Rewa L Alsharif, Razan Y Almleaky, Khalid S Menshawi, Turki M Alqurashi, Abdullah Almaqhawi","doi":"10.3390/clinpract15090167","DOIUrl":"10.3390/clinpract15090167","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: COVID-19 frequently causes olfactory and gustatory dysfunction, including qualitative disorders like parosmia and phantosmia. These distortions affect quality of life and may result from both peripheral and central neural damage. Despite increasing reports, their prevalence, mechanisms, and risk factors remain unclear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical characteristics and possible predictors of parosmia and phantosmia associated with COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia. <b>Methods</b>: This cross-sectional study utilized an online questionnaire targeting adults in Saudi Arabia with self-reported new-onset olfactory or gustatory dysfunction after COVID-19. <b>Results</b>: Out of 539 participants, 377 were included for analysis. Females slightly outnumbered males (195, 51.7% vs. 182, 48.3%) with a mean age of 34.5 years (SD = 12.7). Comorbidities were present in 86 (23.3%) participants, predominantly including hypertension (39.5%) and diabetes (30.2%). Sudden smell and taste loss were reported by 277 (73.5%) and 267 (70.8%) participants, respectively. Regional residence was significantly associated with both smell (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and taste loss (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Academic qualification exhibited borderline significance in relation to taste loss (<i>p</i> = 0.049). Logistic regression analysis indicated no significant predictors of dysfunction, with male gender exhibiting an odds ratio of 1.276 for smell (<i>p</i> = 0.301) and an odds ratio of 1.401 for taste (<i>p</i> = 0.144). Over 60% of participants experienced a negative impact on their quality of life. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study demonstrates the prevalence of parosmia and phantosmia in COVID-19 patients in Saudi Arabia, with a significant impact on quality of life. While regional differences and education level exhibited certain associations, no demographic or clinical factors independently predicted dysfunction, highlighting the necessity for additional research into underlying mechanisms and long-term effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469183/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145151411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}