Tuberkuloz ve Toraks-Tuberculosis and Thorax最新文献

Introduction: Lung cancer is the most common solid organ malignancy requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission. For many years, lung cancer patients were not considered in the priority patient category for admission to ICU because of their high mortality rate and poor response to therapy. Considering the developments in treatment modalities, we aimed to reevaluate the prognosis of patients with lung cancer in the ICU.

Materials and methods: Patients characteristics, date of diagnosis, the reason for ICU admission, the stage of cancer, histopathological type, history of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery for cancer, and APACHE-II and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) were recorded retrospectively.

Result: A total of 100 patients had a mean age of 69.7 ± 9.0 years. Among these patients, 18% had small cell lung cancer, while 82% had non-small cell lung cancer. The in-hospital mortality rate was 69% for all patients, while among those discharged from the ICU, the first 6-month mortality rate was 58.1%. The median survival time was 8.2 months. Advanced age, the need for mechanical ventilation, the need for vasopressors, a high APACHE -II, and the CCI all reduced survival in multivariate analysis, whereas chemotherapy and surgical history improved survival.

Conclusions: Patients admitted to the ICU with lung cancer continue to experience a high mortality rate. However, identifying the factors that are associated with survival can be crucial in establishing care plans and prioritizing ICU admission for further therapy.

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate whether inspiratory muscle strength was associated with bacterial colonization and other clinical outcomes and whether bacterial colonization was associated with clinical outcomes in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB).

Materials and methods: Eighty-six patients were enrolled in a cross-sectional study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of inspiratory muscle weakness and bacterial colonization. Parameters were compared between groups.

Result: Bronchiectasis etiologies were post-infectious, Kartagener's syndrome, and primary ciliary dyskinesia. The median value of MIP was -68, and MEP was 89 cm H2O in all patients. Although the ratio of bacterial colonization was similar to patients without inspiratory muscle weakness, the inspiratory muscle weakness group had a higher number of females, lower FEV1, FVC, ISWT, CRQ, higher MRC, E-FACED, SGRQ, number of hospitalization (p<0.05). When colonized and non-colonized patients were compared, MIP, and MEP were similar in spite of adjusted BMI, age, and sex. FEV1, FVC, ISWT, and ESWT were lower, and E-FACED scores (p<0.05) were higher in colonized patients.

Conclusions: Although inspiratory muscle strength was not associated with bacterial colonization in NCFB patients, it is an important factor that could be linked to disease severity, pulmonary functions, quality of life, and exercise capacity. Bacterial colonization was also associated with severe disease, deteriorated pulmonary functions, and exercise capacity.

Introduction: We analyzed the effects of mepolizumab treatment on symptoms, asthma attacks, pulmonary function test parameters peripheral blood eosinophil level, and percentage in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma receiving mepolizumab treatment as the baseline, sixth and twelfthmonth data.

Materials and methods: The medical records of patients diagnosed with severe eosinophilic asthma and treated with mepolizumab at our clinic were retrospectively reviewed for the period between January 2018 and December 2021. Demographic data of the patients, duration of asthma disease, comorbidities such as a nasal polyp, eosinophilic granulomatous polyangiitis, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug exacerbated respiratory disease were investigated. A comparison was made of various factors before initiating mepolizumab treatment, as well as at the sixth and twelfth month after treatment initiation. These factors include asthma control test scores, frequency of asthma attacks (including emergency admissions, hospitalizations, and intensive care admissions), peripheral blood eosinophil levels and percentages, and pulmonary function test parameters. Clinic and laboratory parameters that provide a prediction of being a responder and super responder were evaluated.

Result: A total of 21 patients were included in the study. Their mean age was 50.7 ± 11.9 years, and four (19%) were males. The mean duration of asthma diagnosis was 17.5 ±13.7 years. 14 patients (66.7%) were atopic. 4 patients (19%) had nasal polyps and four patients (19%) had NERD. Before mepolizumab, 13 (61.9%) patients had received omalizumab. The duration of receiving mepolizumab treatment was 29.2 ± 9.9 months. A statistically significant decrease was observed in both the number and percentage of eosinophils at months six and 12 (p<0.01). There was a statistically significant increase in FEV1 values both as a percentage and in milliliters at month 12. There was an increase in both percentage and milliliters in FEF25-75 values, but this increase did not reach statistical significance. There was a decrease in service admissions, intensive care admissions, and emergency admissions due to asthma exacerbations. Out of 21 patients, 11 (52.4%) were classified as responders, while 10 (47.6%) were classified as super responders.

Conclusions: Although the number of patients in our study was limited, mepolizumab improved symptom scores in severe eosinophilic asthma, reduced the number of attacks, and improved pulmonary function test values.

Introduction: There is consensus that patients at risk of developing an allergic reaction to COVID-19 vaccines should be evaluated by an immunologist-allergist to determine whether vaccination should be recommended. We wanted to share our experiences in the management of these high-risk patients, from diagnostic tests in allergological evaluation to the vaccination process.

Materials and methods: Our retrospective cross-sectional study included patients who had previously developed an allergic reaction to COVID-19 vaccines or drugs and therefore were referred to our allergy and immunology clinic. Prick and intradermal tests were performed on all patients with methylprednisolone acetate (Depo-Medrol®, Pfizer) 40 mg/mL containing polyethylene Glycol (PEG) and triamcinolone acetonide (Kenacort®, Deva) 40 mg/mL containing polysorbate 80. While vaccination with desensitization was recommended for all patients with positive skin tests, split-dose vaccination was recommended for patients with negative skin tests. After explaining the risks and benefits, the choice of the vaccine (Pfizer/BioNTech or Sinovac/ CoronoVac) was left to the patients' discretion.

Result: A total of 41 patients, 10 males, and 31 females, with a mean age of 42.37 ± 14.177 years were included. Eighteen patients with a history of allergy after COVID-19 vaccines were analyzed according to the type of reaction and type of vaccine administered (Pfizer/BioNTech/Coronovac; Anaphylaxis: 4/1, Urticaria: 11/2). Moreover, there was a history of drug allergy in 23 patients who had not been vaccinated before. Skin tests with PEG were positive in a total of seven patients while skin tests with polysorbate 80 were negative in all patients. No allergic reaction developed in seven patients who underwent desensitization and in 34 patients who received a split dose.

Conclusions: Considering the potentially life-saving benefits of vaccination in a global pandemic environment, it is a safe and effective method to administer vaccines to at-risk patients using desensitization or split dosing techniques, based on their sensitivity status determined through a PEG skin test. This approach allows for the avoidance of preventing access to vaccines, while still ensuring the safety of patients.

Severe asthma is associated with increased use of healthcare services, significant deterioration in the quality of life, and high disease and economic burden on patients and societies. Additional treatments are required for severe forms of asthma. Biological agents are recommended for the treatment of severe asthma. In this current status report, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety data of approved biologics; omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab, and tezepelumab, in the treatment of severe asthma and appropriate patient profiles for these biologics. Pubmed and Cochrane databases based on randomized controlled trials, posthoc analyses, meta-analyses, and real-life studies examining the efficacy and effectiveness of biologics in severe asthma were searched, and the results of these studies on important asthma outcomes were reviewed. Existing studies have shown that all the approved biologic agents targeting cells, receptors, and mediators involved in type 2 inflammation in the bronchial wall in severe asthma significantly reduce asthma exacerbations, reduce the need for oral corticosteroids, and improve asthma control, quality of life, and pulmonary functions. Characterizing the asthma endotype and phenotype in patients with severe asthma and determining which treatment would be more appropriate for a particular patient is an essential step in personalized treatment.

Introduction: Post-COVID period is considered to be 12 weeks after the COVID-19 infection. Patients in the post-COVID period may have prolonged or newly developed symptoms. Depending on the prolonged effects of the disease, respiratory and functional parameters may be affected. The aim of the study is to investigate the effect of COVID-19 infection on respiratory and functional parameters in the post-COVID period.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the functional parameters of patients with COVID-19 in the post-COVID period. Subjects with a history of microbiologically proven COVID-19 infection were evaluated with 6-minute walk test results, Borg, and MRC results at least 12 weeks after COVID-19 infection. The relationship between demographic characteristics, comorbidities, vaccination status, and severity of disease with 6-minute walk test results and dyspnea scales in the post-COVID period was investigated.

Result: Two hundred seventeen patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 48.6 ± 14.9 years and 126 (58.1%) of them were female. 142 (65.4%) of the patients were completely vaccinated against COVID-19 and 75 (34.6%) patients were incompletely vaccinated or unvaccinated. 158 (72.8%) patients had mild disease, 51 (23.5%) patients had moderate disease, and eight (3.7%) patients had severe disease. Those with a history of moderate or severe disease had significantly worsened functional parameters in the postCOVID period compared to those with mild COVID-19. The Borg scale and MRC dyspnea scale values were significantly higher in women (p= 0.008, p= 0.002, respectively). Functional parameters of those who were completely vaccinated against COVID-19 and those who were incompletely or unvaccinated individuals in the post-COVID period were similar.

Conclusions: The functional parameters of people with moderate or severe COVID-19 disease were found to be significantly impaired in the post-COVID period. While the effect of smoking and vaccination status on functional parameters in the post-COVID period could not be demonstrated, disease severity and accompanying comorbidity were found to be effective.