Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cnp.2025.10.001
Xiaoyi Xu , Shuping Chen , Zifan Li , Lijie Zhang , Tianjin Pan , Siying Long , Tingting Yang , Meng Li , Qianru Li , Na Chen , Shangjie Chen , Qing Zeng
Objective
Growing evidence highlights the cerebellum, particularly the right posterior lobule, in advanced language processes such as fluency, syntax, and phonological memory. However, its specific role in post-stroke aphasia recovery—especially its modulation of cortical networks and functional connectivity (FC)—remains unclear, which limits targeted intreventions.
Methods
Sixteen post-stroke aphasia patients were randomized to receive either cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with speech therapy or sham stimulation with therapy. Language performance was assessed via the Chinese Standard Aphasia Scale (CRRCAE), and brain activation was monitored using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).
Results
Both groups showed significant CRRCAE score improvements post-treatment (P < 0.05), without between-group differences (P > 0.05). FC reductions were noted across several interhemispheric and right-hemispheric pathways, while increased FC was observed in left hemisphere language-related areas.
Conclusion
After baseline adjustment, the intervention group showed superior gains. Cerebellar tDCS modulates FC, suggesting a potential mechanism for enhancing aphasia recovery.
Significance
Findings support the cerebellum as a promising neuromodulation target for post-stroke aphasia treatment.
{"title":"Efficacy of cerebellar cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke aphasia: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Xiaoyi Xu , Shuping Chen , Zifan Li , Lijie Zhang , Tianjin Pan , Siying Long , Tingting Yang , Meng Li , Qianru Li , Na Chen , Shangjie Chen , Qing Zeng","doi":"10.1016/j.cnp.2025.10.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cnp.2025.10.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Growing evidence highlights the cerebellum, particularly the right posterior lobule, in advanced language processes such as fluency, syntax, and phonological memory. However, its specific role in post-stroke aphasia recovery—especially its modulation of cortical networks and functional connectivity (FC)—remains unclear, which limits targeted intreventions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sixteen post-stroke aphasia patients were randomized to receive either cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with speech therapy or sham stimulation with therapy. Language performance was assessed via the Chinese Standard Aphasia Scale (CRRCAE), and brain activation was monitored using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both groups showed significant CRRCAE score improvements post-treatment (P < 0.05), without between-group differences (P > 0.05). FC reductions were noted across several interhemispheric and right-hemispheric pathways, while increased FC was observed in left hemisphere language-related areas.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>After baseline adjustment, the intervention group showed superior gains. Cerebellar tDCS modulates FC, suggesting a potential mechanism for enhancing aphasia recovery.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Findings support the cerebellum as a promising neuromodulation target for post-stroke aphasia treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45697,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","volume":"10 ","pages":"Pages 464-473"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145319650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cnp.2025.06.005
Mohammad Mahdi Talimkhani , Ailin Talimkhani , Vida Dinarvand , Somayeh Mohamadi , Hamzeh Baharlouei
Objective
This study investigates the potential effects of combining motor skill learning transfer from the unaffected to the affected hand with multiple sessions of dual-transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex to enhance motor skills in stroke patients.
Methods
Eleven stroke patients participated in a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind crossover study. Over two periods separated by a 3-week washout, participants underwent either sham or dual-tDCS concurrently with serial response time tasks (SRTT). Each intervention included 20 min of stimulation during SRTT for three consecutive days. The skill index, the primary variable, was assessed pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and 24 h later.
Results
Both groups showed significant improvement in motor skill learning across the three intervention days (P < 0.001). The dual-tDCS group demonstrated significantly greater skill improvement in the affected hand compared to the sham group (P < 0.01), while no significant differences were found for the unaffected hand (P = 0.98).
Conclusions
Multi-session dual-tDCS combined with motor learning tasks significantly enhances motor skill transfer to the affected hand in stroke patients, with greater and more durable effects compared to sham stimulation.
Significance
This approach may improve bilateral motor skill transfer and hand fatigue management in stroke rehabilitation.
{"title":"The effects of multi-session dual-tDCS on the bilateral transfer of motor skill learning in patients with stroke","authors":"Mohammad Mahdi Talimkhani , Ailin Talimkhani , Vida Dinarvand , Somayeh Mohamadi , Hamzeh Baharlouei","doi":"10.1016/j.cnp.2025.06.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cnp.2025.06.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study investigates the potential effects of combining motor skill learning transfer from the unaffected to the affected hand with multiple sessions of dual-transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex to enhance motor skills in stroke patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eleven stroke patients participated in a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind crossover study. Over two periods separated by a 3-week washout, participants underwent either sham or dual-tDCS concurrently with serial response time tasks (SRTT). Each intervention included 20 min of stimulation during SRTT for three consecutive days. The skill index, the primary variable, was assessed pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and 24 h later.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both groups showed significant improvement in motor skill learning across the three intervention days (P < 0.001). The dual-tDCS group demonstrated significantly greater skill improvement in the affected hand compared to the sham group (P < 0.01), while no significant differences were found for the unaffected hand (P = 0.98).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Multi-session dual-tDCS combined with motor learning tasks significantly enhances motor skill transfer to the affected hand in stroke patients, with greater and more durable effects compared to sham stimulation.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>This approach may improve bilateral motor skill transfer and hand fatigue management in stroke rehabilitation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45697,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","volume":"10 ","pages":"Pages 236-245"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144562781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cnp.2025.06.001
Brin E. Freund , Khalil S. Husari , José L. Fernández-Torre , Philippe Gélisse , Peter W. Kaplan
Generalized periodic discharges (GPDs) with triphasic morphology (triphasic waves, TWs) are EEG waveforms that have been a frequent topic of research evaluating their etiology and clinical correlates. More specifically, prior studies have tried to better elucidate their implications regarding seizures to help guide decision making regarding empiric treatment and EEG monitoring and in spite of multiple studies, controversies remain due to disparate findings. In this review we discuss the historical views of TWs and their clinical and radiographic correlates, highlight the typical and atypical features of TWs, discuss the controversy related to the association between TWs and seizures, and propose an approach to their management.
{"title":"Triphasic waves: To treat or not to treat?","authors":"Brin E. Freund , Khalil S. Husari , José L. Fernández-Torre , Philippe Gélisse , Peter W. Kaplan","doi":"10.1016/j.cnp.2025.06.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cnp.2025.06.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Generalized periodic discharges (GPDs) with triphasic morphology (triphasic waves, TWs) are EEG waveforms that have been a frequent topic of research evaluating their etiology and clinical correlates. More specifically, prior studies have tried to better elucidate their implications regarding seizures to help guide decision making regarding empiric treatment and EEG monitoring and in spite of multiple studies, controversies remain due to disparate findings. In this review we discuss the historical views of TWs and their clinical and radiographic correlates, highlight the typical and atypical features of TWs, discuss the controversy related to the association between TWs and seizures, and propose an approach to their management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45697,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","volume":"10 ","pages":"Pages 265-277"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144605722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cnp.2025.08.009
Perianen Ramasawmy , Krisztián Iszak , Steffen Brüshaber , Viktória Kállay , Géza Gergely Ambrus , Walter Paulus , Andrea Antal
Background
The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is a key contributor to memory categorization. Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) Val66Met polymorphism affects the efficacy of neuronal plasticity induction. We investigated whether DLPFC-transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) influences categorization performance, and whether BNDF genotype modulates this effect.
Methods
Sixty-two healthy individuals were randomized to receive 10 min of either anodal right DLPFC-tDCS at 1 mA, or sham tDCS during the training phase of a prototype distortion task. Categorization performance was assessed during, shortly after, and the morning following the stimulation. Val66Met polymorphism status was determined through BNDF genotyping.
Results
Val66Met carriers showed poorer categorization ability than Val/Val homozygotes (p < 0.0001). tDCS did not enhance categorization performance overall, or reduce genotype-associated differences with these specific stimulation parameters. However, tDCS extinguished the prototype effect of the categorization task observed in our sample.
Conclusions
Our findings underscore the importance of BDNF polymorphism in category learning. 1 mA anodal right DLPFC over the right DLPFC does not improve performance or offset genotype differences under tested conditions.
Significance
BDNF Val66Met polymorphism influences category learning, and low-intensity tDCS does not counteract this effect, emphasizing the need to refine stimulation protocols for genotype-specific cognitive enhancement.
{"title":"When genetics prevail: brain stimulation fails to overcome learning deficits from brain-derived neurotrophic factor Val66Met","authors":"Perianen Ramasawmy , Krisztián Iszak , Steffen Brüshaber , Viktória Kállay , Géza Gergely Ambrus , Walter Paulus , Andrea Antal","doi":"10.1016/j.cnp.2025.08.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cnp.2025.08.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is a key contributor to memory categorization. Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) <em>Val66Met</em> polymorphism affects the efficacy of neuronal plasticity induction. We investigated whether DLPFC-transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) influences categorization performance, and whether BNDF genotype modulates this effect.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sixty-two healthy individuals were randomized to receive 10 min of either anodal right DLPFC-tDCS at 1 mA, or sham tDCS during the training phase of a prototype distortion task. Categorization performance was assessed during, shortly after, and the morning following the stimulation. <em>Val66Met</em> polymorphism status was determined through BNDF genotyping.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><em>Val66Met</em> carriers showed poorer categorization ability than <em>Val/Val</em> homozygotes (p < 0.0001). tDCS did not enhance categorization performance overall, or reduce genotype-associated differences with these specific stimulation parameters. However, tDCS extinguished the prototype effect of the categorization task observed in our sample.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings underscore the importance of BDNF polymorphism in category learning. 1 mA anodal right DLPFC over the right DLPFC does not improve performance or offset genotype differences under tested conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>BDNF <em>Val66Met</em> polymorphism influences category learning, and low-intensity tDCS does not counteract this effect, emphasizing the need to refine stimulation protocols for genotype-specific cognitive enhancement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45697,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","volume":"10 ","pages":"Pages 350-358"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145007533","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cnp.2025.10.007
Tim Coolen , Alexandru Mihai Dumitrescu , Vincent Wens , Mathieu Bourguignon , Antonin Rovai , Niloufar Sadeghi , Charline Urbain , Xavier De Tiège
Objective
To compare and integrate hemispheric lateralization and spatial patterns of language mapping derived from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magnetoencephalography (MEG).
Method
Twenty right-handed healthy adults performed three language tasks (verb/noun generation, phonological/semantic fluency, and sentence completion). A unified framework ensured methodological consistency across modalities: (i) identical tasks; (ii) individual mapping of block-level signal changes in fMRI and broadband (4–40 Hz) oscillatory power decreases in MEG; (iii) subject-level spatial extent-based thresholding of intramodality maps and quantification of intermodality overlap. Laterality indices (LI) were compared and combined across tasks and modalities to assess lateralization discordances. Spatial patterns were obtained by averaging individual maps, while permutation statistics evaluated intermodality spatial differences.
Results
Task- and modality-combined LI reduced intermodality lateralization discordance from 45% to 10%. MEG showed twice the LI variability of fMRI. Overlap was concentrated in left fronto-temporal regions, while spatial differences emerged in left fronto-parietal areas (fMRI) and temporal/opercular regions (MEG).
Conclusion
Although core language areas were identified in both modalities, modality- and task-integration may enhance robustness of language mapping in healthy subjects.
Significance
Lateralization discordances and modality-specific spatial patterns, along with MEG’s higher lateralization variability, suggest that multimodal integration could aid in presurgical clinical decision-making.
{"title":"Comparison of lateralization and spatial patterns of hemodynamic and neuromagnetic language brain mapping","authors":"Tim Coolen , Alexandru Mihai Dumitrescu , Vincent Wens , Mathieu Bourguignon , Antonin Rovai , Niloufar Sadeghi , Charline Urbain , Xavier De Tiège","doi":"10.1016/j.cnp.2025.10.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cnp.2025.10.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare and integrate hemispheric lateralization and spatial patterns of language mapping derived from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magnetoencephalography (MEG).</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Twenty right-handed healthy adults performed three language tasks (verb/noun generation, phonological/semantic fluency, and sentence completion). A unified framework ensured methodological consistency across modalities: (i) identical tasks; (ii) individual mapping of block-level signal changes in fMRI and broadband (4–40 Hz) oscillatory power decreases in MEG; (iii) subject-level spatial extent-based thresholding of intramodality maps and quantification of intermodality overlap. Laterality indices (LI) were compared and combined across tasks and modalities to assess lateralization discordances. Spatial patterns were obtained by averaging individual maps, while permutation statistics evaluated intermodality spatial differences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Task- and modality-combined LI reduced intermodality lateralization discordance from 45% to 10%. MEG showed twice the LI variability of fMRI. Overlap was concentrated in left fronto-temporal regions, while spatial differences emerged in left fronto-parietal areas (fMRI) and temporal/opercular regions (MEG).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although core language areas were identified in both modalities, modality- and task-integration may enhance robustness of language mapping in healthy subjects.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Lateralization discordances and modality-specific spatial patterns, along with MEG’s higher lateralization variability, suggest that multimodal integration could aid in presurgical clinical decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45697,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","volume":"10 ","pages":"Pages 511-523"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145525622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cnp.2025.10.008
Paola Vassallo , Olivia Poole , Xiaodong Guan , Davide Giampiccolo , Eduardo Marques , Umesh Vivekananda , John S. Duncan , Beate Diehl
Background
Electrical cortical stimulation (ECS) is commonly used during invasive presurgical evaluation of drug-resistant focal epilepsy for functional mapping and delineation of the epileptogenic zone.
Case presentation
A 31-year-old woman underwent stereo-EEG evaluation for presurgical assessment of drug-resistant focal epilepsy, likely left frontal or multifocal. During 50 Hz ECS of the right mid-cingulate cortex, a reproducible behavioural response was observed, characterised by left ear popping, head drop, eye closure, and speech/motor arrest, without loss of awareness. This semiology differed from her habitual seizures, and the region was not considered part of the presumed epileptogenic zone.
Conclusion
This case represents a rare video-documentation of stimulation-induced complex motor and behavioural response localised to the mid-cingulate cortex and supports mid-cingulate’s role as connection hub for volitional control and sensorimotor integration.
{"title":"Switch-Off response to mid-cingulate cortex stimulation: a video case report","authors":"Paola Vassallo , Olivia Poole , Xiaodong Guan , Davide Giampiccolo , Eduardo Marques , Umesh Vivekananda , John S. Duncan , Beate Diehl","doi":"10.1016/j.cnp.2025.10.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cnp.2025.10.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Electrical cortical stimulation (ECS) is commonly used during invasive presurgical evaluation of drug-resistant focal epilepsy for functional mapping and delineation of the epileptogenic zone.</div></div><div><h3>Case presentation</h3><div>A 31-year-old woman underwent stereo-EEG evaluation for presurgical assessment of drug-resistant focal epilepsy, likely left frontal or multifocal. During 50 Hz ECS of the right mid-cingulate cortex, a reproducible behavioural response was observed, characterised by left ear popping, head drop, eye closure, and speech/motor arrest, without loss of awareness. This semiology differed from her habitual seizures, and the region was not considered part of the presumed epileptogenic zone.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This case represents a rare video-documentation of stimulation-induced complex motor and behavioural response localised to the mid-cingulate cortex and supports mid-cingulate’s role as connection hub for volitional control and sensorimotor integration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45697,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","volume":"10 ","pages":"Pages 524-526"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145578898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cnp.2025.06.006
Muhammad Rehman , Chris Gyan , Chinar Osman , Ramamurthy Arunachalam
{"title":"Beyond the triad: Review of Miller Fisher Syndrome in a tertiary neurological centre","authors":"Muhammad Rehman , Chris Gyan , Chinar Osman , Ramamurthy Arunachalam","doi":"10.1016/j.cnp.2025.06.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cnp.2025.06.006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45697,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","volume":"10 ","pages":"Pages 234-235"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144548596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cnp.2025.06.009
Essi J. Marttinen Rossi , Päivi Nevalainen , Jussi Toppila , Helena Mäenpää , Jessica Guzmán-López , Harri Piitulainen , Leena Lauronen
Objective
To investigate the modulation of spinal excitability to sub-motor threshold transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in healthy children and adolescents.
Methods
We paired sub-motor threshold TMS (conditioning) with electrical tibial nerve stimulation (test) to assess changes in the soleus H-reflex at eleven conditioning-test (C-T) intervals. Eleven participants (7.5–16.2 years) were studied under three conditions: rest, voluntary agonist activation (ankle plantar flexion), and voluntary antagonist activation (ankle dorsiflexion).
Results
TMS-induced supraspinal volley facilitated the soleus H-reflex amplitude significantly during rest and agonist activation, but not during antagonist activation. The facilitation of H-reflex was similar during rest and agonist activation between C-T intervals from –2 ms (i.e. peripheral stimulation before cortical) to +18 ms (i.e. cortical stimulation before peripheral). Specific to rest condition, a later facilitation occurred at C-T intervals of approximately +60 ms.
Conclusions
Spinal excitability modulation in children and adolescents showed similarities to earlier evidence in adults, with the distinction that, unlike in the adults, agonist activity did not further enhance the supraspinal facilitation of the H-reflex compared to the rest condition in children.
Significance
These results provide insight into the maturation of motor control and regulation of spinal excitability, offering possibilities to identify typical and atypical developmental trajectories.
{"title":"Spinal excitability is enhanced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in children and adolescents","authors":"Essi J. Marttinen Rossi , Päivi Nevalainen , Jussi Toppila , Helena Mäenpää , Jessica Guzmán-López , Harri Piitulainen , Leena Lauronen","doi":"10.1016/j.cnp.2025.06.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cnp.2025.06.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the modulation of spinal excitability to sub-motor threshold transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in healthy children and adolescents.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We paired sub-motor threshold TMS (conditioning) with electrical tibial nerve stimulation (test) to assess changes in the soleus H-reflex at eleven conditioning-test (C-T) intervals. Eleven participants (7.5–16.2 years) were studied under three conditions: rest, voluntary agonist activation (ankle plantar flexion), and voluntary antagonist activation (ankle dorsiflexion).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>TMS-induced supraspinal volley facilitated the soleus H-reflex amplitude significantly during rest and agonist activation, but not during antagonist activation. The facilitation of H-reflex was similar during rest and agonist activation between C-T intervals from –2 ms (i.e. peripheral stimulation before cortical) to +18 ms (i.e. cortical stimulation before peripheral). Specific to rest condition, a later facilitation occurred at C-T intervals of approximately +60 ms.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Spinal excitability modulation in children and adolescents showed similarities to earlier evidence in adults, with the distinction that, unlike in the adults, agonist activity did not further enhance the supraspinal facilitation of the H-reflex compared to the rest condition in children.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>These results provide insight into the maturation of motor control and regulation of spinal excitability, offering possibilities to identify typical and atypical developmental trajectories.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45697,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","volume":"10 ","pages":"Pages 278-285"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144632001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cnp.2025.08.007
Jinyang Zhuang
{"title":"The underlying mechanism of mirror visual feedback in stroke. In reply to: challenging the electrophysiological interpretation of mirror visual feedback in stroke","authors":"Jinyang Zhuang","doi":"10.1016/j.cnp.2025.08.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cnp.2025.08.007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45697,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","volume":"10 ","pages":"Pages 402-403"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145104577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cnp.2025.04.002
Karolina af Edholm , Mikkel C. Vinding , Christoph Pfeiffer , Anders Svenningsson , Erik Fransén , Mathias Sundgren , Henrik Sjöström , Niklas Edvall , Daniel Lundqvist , Josefine Waldthaler
Objective
Patients with primary orthostatic tremor (OT) are affected by a strong feeling of instability. Our aim was to investigate whether cortical response to proprioceptive information is altered in OT compared with healthy control subjects (HC) using magnetoencephalography (MEG).
Methods
Fifteen OT patients and 15 HCs were examined using whole-head MEG. Proprioceptive stimulation was evoked by passive movements of the right index finger and right foot. Time-frequency responses were extracted in the frequency range of 8–30 Hz. The MEG sensor with the highest amplitude change time-locked to the proprioceptive stimulus was used to calculate the amplitude of event-related desynchronization (ERD) and subsequent event-related re-synchronization (ERS).
Results
Finger stimulation induced reliable ERD and ERS, as expected, in both OT patients and HC. Foot stimulation induced weaker ERS in both groups. Cluster-based permutation tests did not reveal any significant differences between the OT and HC groups.
Discussion
We did not find evidence supporting a generally altered cortical response to proprioceptive stimulation in patients with OT.
Significance
This is the first study on proprioceptive cortical processing in OT. The results do not support the interpretation that the characteristic intense feeling of instability in OT is linked to altered cortical response to proprioceptive information.
{"title":"Cortical response to proprioceptive stimulation in primary orthostatic tremor – a magnetoencephalography study","authors":"Karolina af Edholm , Mikkel C. Vinding , Christoph Pfeiffer , Anders Svenningsson , Erik Fransén , Mathias Sundgren , Henrik Sjöström , Niklas Edvall , Daniel Lundqvist , Josefine Waldthaler","doi":"10.1016/j.cnp.2025.04.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cnp.2025.04.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Patients with primary orthostatic tremor (OT) are affected by a strong feeling of instability. Our aim was to investigate whether cortical response to proprioceptive information is altered in OT compared with healthy control subjects (HC) using magnetoencephalography (MEG).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Fifteen OT patients and 15 HCs were examined using whole-head MEG. Proprioceptive stimulation was evoked by passive movements of the right index finger and right foot. Time-frequency responses were extracted in the frequency range of 8–30 Hz. The MEG sensor with the highest amplitude change time-locked to the proprioceptive stimulus was used to calculate the amplitude of event-related desynchronization (ERD) and subsequent event-related re-synchronization (ERS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Finger stimulation induced reliable ERD and ERS, as expected, in both OT patients and HC. Foot stimulation induced weaker ERS in both groups. Cluster-based permutation tests did not reveal any significant differences between the OT and HC groups.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>We did not find evidence supporting a generally altered cortical response to proprioceptive stimulation in patients with OT.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>This is the first study on proprioceptive cortical processing in OT. The results do not support the interpretation that the characteristic intense feeling of instability in OT is linked to altered cortical response to proprioceptive information.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45697,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","volume":"10 ","pages":"Pages 159-166"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143923885","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}