Pub Date : 2022-02-22DOI: 10.1080/00207411.2022.2038983
Emily C. Graybill, Ashley Salmon, Brian Barger, Andrew T. Roach
{"title":"Examining the predictive utility of the self-report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire with middle school students","authors":"Emily C. Graybill, Ashley Salmon, Brian Barger, Andrew T. Roach","doi":"10.1080/00207411.2022.2038983","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207411.2022.2038983","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46170,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44218423","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-21DOI: 10.1080/00207411.2022.2041266
G. Rahill, Manisha Joshi, Judite Blanc, Kerry Littlewood, A. Salinas-Miranda, C. Rice
{"title":"Self-reported sleep disturbance patterns in urban haitians: A latent class analysis","authors":"G. Rahill, Manisha Joshi, Judite Blanc, Kerry Littlewood, A. Salinas-Miranda, C. Rice","doi":"10.1080/00207411.2022.2041266","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207411.2022.2041266","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46170,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48962454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-18DOI: 10.1080/00207411.2022.2035905
S. El-Tallawy, M. Titi, A. A. Ejaz, A. Abdulmomen, Hala Elmorshedy, F. Aldammas, J. Baaj, M. Alharbi, Ahmad Alqatari
Abstract The involvement of anesthetists in high-risk interventions exposes them to a serious risk of acquiring an infection and therefore exacerbates their psychological pressure during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to evaluate mental health problems among anesthetists in Saudi Arabia by quantifying the severity of distress, anxiety, and depression symptoms. The study is a cross-sectional, hospital-based online survey. Distress symptoms were assessed using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised Questionnaires (IES-R), and depression and anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4). Multivariate logistic regression was used. A total of 296 respondents completed the survey. Overall, distress, anxiety, and depression symptoms were identified in 25.3%, 29.4%, and 30.7% of respondents, respectively. Anesthetists who were Saudi, single, under 50 years old, had a relative or friend with COVID-19, were dissatisfied with safety measures, felt stigmatized, smoked during the pandemic, and worked in secondary hospitals had higher degrees of severity on two or more measures of mental health symptoms than other respondents. Our findings highlight the mental health vulnerabilities of anesthetists in Saudi Arabia. Lack of confidence in infection control measures, as well as stigmatization, were found to be risk factors for distress, anxiety, and depression symptoms during the pandemic.
{"title":"Prevalence and risk factors associated with mental health symptoms among anesthetists in Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"S. El-Tallawy, M. Titi, A. A. Ejaz, A. Abdulmomen, Hala Elmorshedy, F. Aldammas, J. Baaj, M. Alharbi, Ahmad Alqatari","doi":"10.1080/00207411.2022.2035905","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207411.2022.2035905","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The involvement of anesthetists in high-risk interventions exposes them to a serious risk of acquiring an infection and therefore exacerbates their psychological pressure during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to evaluate mental health problems among anesthetists in Saudi Arabia by quantifying the severity of distress, anxiety, and depression symptoms. The study is a cross-sectional, hospital-based online survey. Distress symptoms were assessed using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised Questionnaires (IES-R), and depression and anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4). Multivariate logistic regression was used. A total of 296 respondents completed the survey. Overall, distress, anxiety, and depression symptoms were identified in 25.3%, 29.4%, and 30.7% of respondents, respectively. Anesthetists who were Saudi, single, under 50 years old, had a relative or friend with COVID-19, were dissatisfied with safety measures, felt stigmatized, smoked during the pandemic, and worked in secondary hospitals had higher degrees of severity on two or more measures of mental health symptoms than other respondents. Our findings highlight the mental health vulnerabilities of anesthetists in Saudi Arabia. Lack of confidence in infection control measures, as well as stigmatization, were found to be risk factors for distress, anxiety, and depression symptoms during the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":46170,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH","volume":"51 1","pages":"448 - 469"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45030513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-15DOI: 10.1080/00207411.2022.2038984
Amity Noltemeyer, R. Ward, R. Fischbein, Natalie Bonfine, C. Ritter, Caitie Zierden, Jonathan Seok
Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with increased mental illness rates, although the degree to which is associated with mental health stigmatizing attitudes and helping intentions is unknown. Aims This vignette-based study examined differences in health professions students’ attitudes and intentions to help an individual described as experiencing anxiety with or without exacerbation due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods College students majoring in health and human service professions (n = 419) completed an online survey, including questions about a vignette describing a person experiencing anxiety. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two vignette conditions, with one condition mentioning COVID-19 exacerbated the person’s anxiety. Results When the vignette was framed as anxiety symptoms due to COVID-19, participants were less likely to endorse helping behaviors and were less likely to be willing to spend time with the target. Conclusions Despite the study limitations, results reveal avenues for future research that may aid in training future health professionals and preventing stigma.
{"title":"Health professions student helping behaviors and attitudes toward a person experiencing anxiety within the context of COVID-19","authors":"Amity Noltemeyer, R. Ward, R. Fischbein, Natalie Bonfine, C. Ritter, Caitie Zierden, Jonathan Seok","doi":"10.1080/00207411.2022.2038984","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207411.2022.2038984","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with increased mental illness rates, although the degree to which is associated with mental health stigmatizing attitudes and helping intentions is unknown. Aims This vignette-based study examined differences in health professions students’ attitudes and intentions to help an individual described as experiencing anxiety with or without exacerbation due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods College students majoring in health and human service professions (n = 419) completed an online survey, including questions about a vignette describing a person experiencing anxiety. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two vignette conditions, with one condition mentioning COVID-19 exacerbated the person’s anxiety. Results When the vignette was framed as anxiety symptoms due to COVID-19, participants were less likely to endorse helping behaviors and were less likely to be willing to spend time with the target. Conclusions Despite the study limitations, results reveal avenues for future research that may aid in training future health professionals and preventing stigma.","PeriodicalId":46170,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH","volume":"51 1","pages":"189 - 199"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44569988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-08DOI: 10.1080/00207411.2022.2035904
Mahmoud Mohamed Emam, Maha Al-Hendawi, Dalia Gaafar Ali
Abstract
Parents of children with disabilities (CWD) may experience varying degrees of stress due to the multiplicity of factors affecting both the lives of the children and the increased challenges to parental roles. There has been limited research on the stress experienced by parents of children with disabilities in Arab countries; however, this is in part because of the paucity of reliable and valid instruments to measure stress in this population. We examined the psychometric properties of a widely used instrument, the Parenting Stress Index—Short Form (PSI-SF), on a sample of parents of children with disabilities in three Arab countries: Oman, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia. Using data from 867 participants, a confirmatory factor analysis found that the data fit a three-factor model. The model showed high reliability for the PSI-SF as well as positive correlations of moderate to high magnitude between the latent factors in each country. The results support configural, metric, scalar, and strict invariance across the three countries. Implications for the use of the PSI-SF by clinicians, psychologists, and educational professionals in Arab countries are discussed.
{"title":"Stress in families of children with disabilities: An examination of the parenting stress index–short form (PSI-SF) in three Arab Countries","authors":"Mahmoud Mohamed Emam, Maha Al-Hendawi, Dalia Gaafar Ali","doi":"10.1080/00207411.2022.2035904","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207411.2022.2035904","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Abstract</b></p><p>Parents of children with disabilities (CWD) may experience varying degrees of stress due to the multiplicity of factors affecting both the lives of the children and the increased challenges to parental roles. There has been limited research on the stress experienced by parents of children with disabilities in Arab countries; however, this is in part because of the paucity of reliable and valid instruments to measure stress in this population. We examined the psychometric properties of a widely used instrument, the Parenting Stress Index—Short Form (PSI-SF), on a sample of parents of children with disabilities in three Arab countries: Oman, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia. Using data from 867 participants, a confirmatory factor analysis found that the data fit a three-factor model. The model showed high reliability for the PSI-SF as well as positive correlations of moderate to high magnitude between the latent factors in each country. The results support configural, metric, scalar, and strict invariance across the three countries. Implications for the use of the PSI-SF by clinicians, psychologists, and educational professionals in Arab countries are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46170,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH","volume":"39 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138527176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-24DOI: 10.1080/00207411.2022.2028057
J. Danquah, P. Mante
Abstract Respiratory infections have the potential to cause psychiatric symptoms as has been observed during previous outbreaks of respiratory infections. Similarly, the ongoing Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic could also be associated with psychiatric complications. Our study therefore assesses COVID-19 survivors 3 months post-recovery for potential impact on their psychiatric states. Adult patients (n = 368) were evaluated for clinical parameters, oxygen saturation level and C-reactive protein (CRP) level. Using self-report questionnaires, PTSD, depression and anxiety symptoms were assessed. Sociodemographic information was also collected. Mean follow-up CRP level was 6.73 ± 1.78 whiles mean oxygen saturation level was 97.79 ± 4.25. Symptoms for all psychiatric measures ranked significantly (p < 0.0001) higher in participants with previous psychiatric history, in females and in patients who had been hospitalized. Generally, 20.4% fell within the pathological range for PTSD; 42.93% for depression and 46.05% for anxiety. Follow-up CRP levels were significantly (p < 0.0001) higher in patients with positive psychiatric history and in patients that had been hospitalized. Follow-up oxygen saturation levels were also significantly (p < 0.0023) higher in patients who had been managed at home. COVID-19 infection may impact significantly on mental health and hence, trigger PTSD, depression, and anxiety symptoms post-recovery.
{"title":"Post-illness anxiety, depression and PTSD symptoms in COVID-19 survivors","authors":"J. Danquah, P. Mante","doi":"10.1080/00207411.2022.2028057","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207411.2022.2028057","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Respiratory infections have the potential to cause psychiatric symptoms as has been observed during previous outbreaks of respiratory infections. Similarly, the ongoing Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic could also be associated with psychiatric complications. Our study therefore assesses COVID-19 survivors 3 months post-recovery for potential impact on their psychiatric states. Adult patients (n = 368) were evaluated for clinical parameters, oxygen saturation level and C-reactive protein (CRP) level. Using self-report questionnaires, PTSD, depression and anxiety symptoms were assessed. Sociodemographic information was also collected. Mean follow-up CRP level was 6.73 ± 1.78 whiles mean oxygen saturation level was 97.79 ± 4.25. Symptoms for all psychiatric measures ranked significantly (p < 0.0001) higher in participants with previous psychiatric history, in females and in patients who had been hospitalized. Generally, 20.4% fell within the pathological range for PTSD; 42.93% for depression and 46.05% for anxiety. Follow-up CRP levels were significantly (p < 0.0001) higher in patients with positive psychiatric history and in patients that had been hospitalized. Follow-up oxygen saturation levels were also significantly (p < 0.0023) higher in patients who had been managed at home. COVID-19 infection may impact significantly on mental health and hence, trigger PTSD, depression, and anxiety symptoms post-recovery.","PeriodicalId":46170,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH","volume":"51 1","pages":"131 - 141"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45950679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-10DOI: 10.1080/00207411.2021.2017393
Zaid R Najdawi, Ramiz Kardan, Ibrahim Zuraik, Zaid Al Shobaki, S. Alarood, L. Dardas
{"title":"Depressive symptoms among students pursuing the general secondary education certificate examination (Tawjihi): A national study","authors":"Zaid R Najdawi, Ramiz Kardan, Ibrahim Zuraik, Zaid Al Shobaki, S. Alarood, L. Dardas","doi":"10.1080/00207411.2021.2017393","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207411.2021.2017393","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46170,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48447487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-02DOI: 10.1080/00207411.2022.2028067
Kossi B. Kounou, Alexandre Dubanchet, E. Bui
{"title":"Promoting evidence-based psychosocial interventions in Africa: An editorial","authors":"Kossi B. Kounou, Alexandre Dubanchet, E. Bui","doi":"10.1080/00207411.2022.2028067","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207411.2022.2028067","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46170,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH","volume":"51 1","pages":"1 - 3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48434748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-17DOI: 10.1080/00207411.2021.2015230
F. Letourneur, Louise Collonge, Alexandre Makdassi, Pierre Gérard, Gérard Boittiaux, F. Chastang
{"title":"Suicide attempts and COVID-19 related confinement measures in France: Happy ending or dangerous liaisons?","authors":"F. Letourneur, Louise Collonge, Alexandre Makdassi, Pierre Gérard, Gérard Boittiaux, F. Chastang","doi":"10.1080/00207411.2021.2015230","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207411.2021.2015230","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46170,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH","volume":"51 1","pages":"95 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59188025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-10DOI: 10.1080/00207411.2021.1959807
Megan A. Kirk, Meysam Pirbaglou, R. Weerasekera, P. Ritvo
Abstract Background Online cognitive behavioral interventions that include mindfulness techniques have attracted considerable attention given the demonstrated mental health benefits of mindfulness and the availability of scalable opportunities for increased therapeutic use. However, comparatively little is known about the effectiveness of these types of interventions when they are delivered to clinician-diagnosed populations receiving psychiatric treatment. Aims This review evaluates therapeutic interventions that included a mindfulness component aimed at reducing anxiety and depression symptoms in clinician-diagnosed samples. Methods Randomized control trials (RCTs) published between January 1990 to September 2020 assessing the effects of online cognitive behavioral interventions that include a mindfulness component were searched across five databases (Medline, PsychINFO, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science). Results Eleven studies met inclusion criteria with sample sizes ranging from 37 to 84 per study. Findings revealed an overall statistically significant moderate between-group difference at post-intervention for depression (Hedges’ g = −0.47) and anxiety (Hedges’ g = −0.40) outcomes favoring the online treatment groups. Further analyses revealed larger effect sizes among RCTs employing waitlist control (WLC) comparisons, and reductions in depression symptoms within the intervention groups to be above the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for BDI-II. Conclusions Findings from this meta-analytic review provide preliminary support for including mindfulness practices within existing therapeutic programs to reduce depression and anxiety symptoms in clinician-diagnosed populations. Research implications and priorities for online mindfulness-based cognitive behavioral programming are discussed.
背景:考虑到正念对心理健康的益处和可扩展的治疗应用的可用性，包括正念技术在内的在线认知行为干预已经引起了相当大的关注。然而，相对而言，这些类型的干预措施的有效性知之甚少，当他们交付给临床诊断的人群接受精神病治疗。目的:本综述评估了包括正念成分的治疗干预措施，旨在减少临床诊断样本的焦虑和抑郁症状。方法在五个数据库(Medline、PsychINFO、PubMed、CINAHL、Web of Science)中检索1990年1月至2020年9月发表的评估包括正念成分的在线认知行为干预效果的随机对照试验(rct)。结果11项研究符合纳入标准，每项研究的样本量从37到84不等。研究结果显示，干预后抑郁(Hedges ' g = - 0.47)和焦虑(Hedges ' g = - 0.40)结果的组间差异总体上具有统计学意义，有利于在线治疗组。进一步的分析显示，在采用等候名单对照(WLC)比较的rct中，效果更大，干预组内抑郁症状的减轻高于BDI-II的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。结论:本荟萃分析综述的发现为将正念练习纳入现有治疗方案以减少临床诊断人群的抑郁和焦虑症状提供了初步支持。讨论了基于正念的在线认知行为编程的研究意义和重点。
{"title":"Effectiveness of online cognitive behavioral interventions that include mindfulness for clinically-diagnosed anxiety and depressive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Megan A. Kirk, Meysam Pirbaglou, R. Weerasekera, P. Ritvo","doi":"10.1080/00207411.2021.1959807","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207411.2021.1959807","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Online cognitive behavioral interventions that include mindfulness techniques have attracted considerable attention given the demonstrated mental health benefits of mindfulness and the availability of scalable opportunities for increased therapeutic use. However, comparatively little is known about the effectiveness of these types of interventions when they are delivered to clinician-diagnosed populations receiving psychiatric treatment. Aims This review evaluates therapeutic interventions that included a mindfulness component aimed at reducing anxiety and depression symptoms in clinician-diagnosed samples. Methods Randomized control trials (RCTs) published between January 1990 to September 2020 assessing the effects of online cognitive behavioral interventions that include a mindfulness component were searched across five databases (Medline, PsychINFO, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science). Results Eleven studies met inclusion criteria with sample sizes ranging from 37 to 84 per study. Findings revealed an overall statistically significant moderate between-group difference at post-intervention for depression (Hedges’ g = −0.47) and anxiety (Hedges’ g = −0.40) outcomes favoring the online treatment groups. Further analyses revealed larger effect sizes among RCTs employing waitlist control (WLC) comparisons, and reductions in depression symptoms within the intervention groups to be above the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for BDI-II. Conclusions Findings from this meta-analytic review provide preliminary support for including mindfulness practices within existing therapeutic programs to reduce depression and anxiety symptoms in clinician-diagnosed populations. Research implications and priorities for online mindfulness-based cognitive behavioral programming are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46170,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH","volume":"51 1","pages":"235 - 266"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43069936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：