Pub Date : 2023-12-16DOI: 10.1080/10833196.2023.2288478
Brenna van der Westhuizen, C. Killingback
{"title":"‘You must have lived it’: learning from the views of physiotherapists who worked during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Brenna van der Westhuizen, C. Killingback","doi":"10.1080/10833196.2023.2288478","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2023.2288478","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46541,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138967191","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-07DOI: 10.1080/10833196.2023.2276971
Flávia Guirro Zuliani, Bruno Henrique de Souza Fonseca, Jéssica Mariana de Aquino Miranda, Luciane Aparecida Pascucci Sande de Souza, Gustavo José Luvizutto
AbstractPurpose The implementation of dance during rehabilitation can generate motivation and patient engagement. The compilation about dance style, type of neurological disease, functional profile, and outcomes may facilitate the understanding of dance applications in neurofunctional rehabilitation scenario. Therefore, this review mapped the studies on dance in neurological rehabilitation.Materials and methods Based on Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, this scoping review addressed dance in rehabilitation in various in- and out-of-hospital environments. The search was conducted between December 2021 and July 2022 on MEDLINE/PubMed®, Cochrane Library, PEDro, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Springer, with a three-step analysis and categorization of the studies: pre-analysis, exploration of the material, and data processing.Results On a total of 2,256 studies identified, 62 were included. The number of publications in the last two decades were: 1980–1989 (n = 2 studies); 1990–1999 (n = 1); 2000–2009 (n = 4); 2010–2019 (n = 41), and from 2020 (n = 16). Dancers were predominant in older (n = 42) and female (n = 599) individuals, compared to younger (n = 20) and male (n = 589) individuals, respectively. They included ballroom dancing (n = 24), Argentine or Adapted Tango (n = 20), aerobic dance (n = 9), and ballet (n = 8). The predominant neurological conditions were Parkinson’s disease (n = 40), stroke (n = 7), intellectual disability (n = 4), multiple sclerosis (n = 4), dementia or cognitive disabilities (n = 3). The predominant outcomes were balance and gait analysis, cognitive functions, motor coordination, psychological symptoms, and quality of life.Conclusion The application of dance in neurological rehabilitation has increased over the last two decades, with an emphasis on ballroom dancing, Argentine tango, and classical ballet in Parkinson’s disease (PD).Keywords: Dancerehabilitationneurological diseasesscoping reviewfunctionality AcknowledgmentsNo specific funding was received from any bodies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors to carry out the work described in this article.Disclosure statementThe authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.Data availability statementThe datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.Additional informationFundingThe author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.
{"title":"A scoping systematic review of dance application as a rehabilitation tool in adults and older individuals with neurological diseases","authors":"Flávia Guirro Zuliani, Bruno Henrique de Souza Fonseca, Jéssica Mariana de Aquino Miranda, Luciane Aparecida Pascucci Sande de Souza, Gustavo José Luvizutto","doi":"10.1080/10833196.2023.2276971","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2023.2276971","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractPurpose The implementation of dance during rehabilitation can generate motivation and patient engagement. The compilation about dance style, type of neurological disease, functional profile, and outcomes may facilitate the understanding of dance applications in neurofunctional rehabilitation scenario. Therefore, this review mapped the studies on dance in neurological rehabilitation.Materials and methods Based on Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, this scoping review addressed dance in rehabilitation in various in- and out-of-hospital environments. The search was conducted between December 2021 and July 2022 on MEDLINE/PubMed®, Cochrane Library, PEDro, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Springer, with a three-step analysis and categorization of the studies: pre-analysis, exploration of the material, and data processing.Results On a total of 2,256 studies identified, 62 were included. The number of publications in the last two decades were: 1980–1989 (n = 2 studies); 1990–1999 (n = 1); 2000–2009 (n = 4); 2010–2019 (n = 41), and from 2020 (n = 16). Dancers were predominant in older (n = 42) and female (n = 599) individuals, compared to younger (n = 20) and male (n = 589) individuals, respectively. They included ballroom dancing (n = 24), Argentine or Adapted Tango (n = 20), aerobic dance (n = 9), and ballet (n = 8). The predominant neurological conditions were Parkinson’s disease (n = 40), stroke (n = 7), intellectual disability (n = 4), multiple sclerosis (n = 4), dementia or cognitive disabilities (n = 3). The predominant outcomes were balance and gait analysis, cognitive functions, motor coordination, psychological symptoms, and quality of life.Conclusion The application of dance in neurological rehabilitation has increased over the last two decades, with an emphasis on ballroom dancing, Argentine tango, and classical ballet in Parkinson’s disease (PD).Keywords: Dancerehabilitationneurological diseasesscoping reviewfunctionality AcknowledgmentsNo specific funding was received from any bodies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors to carry out the work described in this article.Disclosure statementThe authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.Data availability statementThe datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.Additional informationFundingThe author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.","PeriodicalId":46541,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135479747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-23DOI: 10.1080/10833196.2023.2271301
Connie Lombardo, Md Shahidul Islam
Introduction Telerehabilitation has been explored as a solution to several of the barriers to stroke rehabilitation access, and as a necessary alternative to in-person rehabilitation in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This review aims to explore stroke survivors’ acceptance and satisfaction of telerehabilitation delivery of physiotherapy services.
{"title":"Stroke survivors’ acceptance and satisfaction of telerehabilitation delivery of physiotherapy services: a systematic review","authors":"Connie Lombardo, Md Shahidul Islam","doi":"10.1080/10833196.2023.2271301","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2023.2271301","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Telerehabilitation has been explored as a solution to several of the barriers to stroke rehabilitation access, and as a necessary alternative to in-person rehabilitation in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This review aims to explore stroke survivors’ acceptance and satisfaction of telerehabilitation delivery of physiotherapy services.","PeriodicalId":46541,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135366819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-17DOI: 10.1080/10833196.2023.2271309
Marko Bodrozic, Manuela Filipec
AbstractObjective This study aims to create a Croatian version of the PABS-PT questionnaire and determine the psychometric properties.Design This study is a cross-sectional survey of Croatian physiotherapists.Methods The Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists is a questionnaire that includes 36 items. Only physiotherapists working with patients suffering from low back pain and who have been working for at least 1 year in the field of musculoskeletal physiotherapy participated in the study. The Factor and Cronbach’s alpha analyses were performed to determine the factor structure and internal consistency.Results A total of 203 physiotherapists (response rate 69.52%) completed the PABS-PT-CRO. The analysis reveals two factors, i.e. a biomedical and biopsychosocial treatment orientation. The two-factor structure explained 25.8% of the total variance, with factor 1 contributing 17.8% and factor 2 contributing 8%. Thirty-six items were reduced to fifteen, with ten items loading on factor 1 and five on factor 2. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.762 for factor 1 (biomedical scale) and 0.666 for factor 2 (biopsychosocial scale).Conclusion The Croatian version of the PABS-PT appears to be equivalent to the original Dutch version and indicates a similar internal consistency. The questionnaire is valuable and necessary in clinical work for physiotherapists.Keywords: Biopsychosocialattitudephysiotherapistlow back painpsychometric properties Author contributionsBoth authors contributed to the conception and design of the study, data analysis, writing, and revising the manuscript. MB was responsible for data collection.Ethical approvalThis study was approved by the Ethics Committee at the Clinical Hospital Sveti Duh.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.
{"title":"The pain attitudes and beliefs scale for physiotherapists: psychometric properties of the Croatian version","authors":"Marko Bodrozic, Manuela Filipec","doi":"10.1080/10833196.2023.2271309","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2023.2271309","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractObjective This study aims to create a Croatian version of the PABS-PT questionnaire and determine the psychometric properties.Design This study is a cross-sectional survey of Croatian physiotherapists.Methods The Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists is a questionnaire that includes 36 items. Only physiotherapists working with patients suffering from low back pain and who have been working for at least 1 year in the field of musculoskeletal physiotherapy participated in the study. The Factor and Cronbach’s alpha analyses were performed to determine the factor structure and internal consistency.Results A total of 203 physiotherapists (response rate 69.52%) completed the PABS-PT-CRO. The analysis reveals two factors, i.e. a biomedical and biopsychosocial treatment orientation. The two-factor structure explained 25.8% of the total variance, with factor 1 contributing 17.8% and factor 2 contributing 8%. Thirty-six items were reduced to fifteen, with ten items loading on factor 1 and five on factor 2. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.762 for factor 1 (biomedical scale) and 0.666 for factor 2 (biopsychosocial scale).Conclusion The Croatian version of the PABS-PT appears to be equivalent to the original Dutch version and indicates a similar internal consistency. The questionnaire is valuable and necessary in clinical work for physiotherapists.Keywords: Biopsychosocialattitudephysiotherapistlow back painpsychometric properties Author contributionsBoth authors contributed to the conception and design of the study, data analysis, writing, and revising the manuscript. MB was responsible for data collection.Ethical approvalThis study was approved by the Ethics Committee at the Clinical Hospital Sveti Duh.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.","PeriodicalId":46541,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135994794","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-13DOI: 10.1080/10833196.2023.2265767
Mariana Wingood, Michelle G. Criss, Kent E. Irwin, Patricia M. Bamonti, Rebekah Harris, Emma L. Phillips, Jennifer L. Vincenzo, Kevin K. Chui
AbstractBackground Addressing physical activity (PA) barriers is essential for increasing PA levels in middle-aged and older adults. However, there are no recommendations on selecting PA barrier assessment tools.Objectives Thus, we aimed to identify and provide clinimetric properties on PA barrier assessment tools that healthcare providers, exercise experts, and public health officials can use to examine potential barriers faced by community-dwelling adults 50 years and older.Methods We performed a systematic search of the following databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Articles were included if they presented clinimetric data on a PA participation barrier assessment tool for community-dwelling participants with a mean age of 50 years and older. The 561 identified articles underwent multiple rounds of blinded reviews. Included articles underwent data extraction for participant characteristics, scoring, constructs, reference tests, and clinimetric properties.Results The 35 included articles reported on 33 different PA participation barrier assessment tools. Eighteen articles reported on participants with cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, or neurological diagnoses, diabetes, hemodialysis, history of cancer, or mobility limitations. Tools with two or more supporting publications included the Exercise Benefits/Barrier Scale (EBBS), Episode-Specific Interpretations of Exercise Inventory (ESIE), and Inventory of Physical Activity and Barriers (IPAB). Due to differences in methodologies, across-tool comparison was not possible.Conclusion The EBBS, ESIE, and IPAB are promising tools for community-dwelling adults 50 years and older. However, additional research is warranted to identify the best PA barrier assessment tool among adults 50 years and older.Keywords: Physical activitybarriersolder adultsprimary prevention AcknowledgementsWe would like to acknowledge the contributions made by Nancy Bianchi, a librarian at the University of Vermont, for her guidance on identifying appropriate search terms and for completing the searches.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingDr. Vincenzo was supported by the Translational Research Institute (TRI), grant (KL2; TR003108 and UL1 TR003107) through the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health and K76AG074920 from the National Institute on Aging.
摘要背景:解决体力活动障碍对于提高中老年人的PA水平至关重要。然而，在选择PA屏障评估工具方面没有建议。因此，我们的目的是确定并提供PA障碍评估工具的临床特性，医疗保健提供者、运动专家和公共卫生官员可以使用这些工具来检查50岁及以上社区居民面临的潜在障碍。方法系统检索PubMed、PsycINFO、CINAHL和Web of Science数据库。如果文章提供了平均年龄在50岁及以上的社区居民参与PA障碍评估工具的临床数据，则纳入。561篇确定的文章进行了多轮盲法评价。对纳入的文章进行了参与者特征、评分、结构、参考测试和临床特性的数据提取。结果纳入的35篇文章报道了33种不同的PA参与障碍评估工具。18篇文章报道了心血管、肌肉骨骼或神经系统诊断、糖尿病、血液透析、癌症史或活动受限的参与者。有两种或两种以上支持出版物的工具包括运动益处/障碍量表(EBBS)、运动量表(ESIE)和身体活动和障碍量表(IPAB)。由于方法上的差异，跨工具比较是不可能的。结论EBBS、ESIE和IPAB是50岁及以上社区居民的有效工具。然而，在50岁及以上的成年人中，需要进一步的研究来确定最佳的PA屏障评估工具。我们要感谢佛蒙特大学图书管理员Nancy Bianchi的贡献，她指导我们确定了合适的搜索词并完成了搜索。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。额外的informationFundingDr。Vincenzo由转化研究所(TRI)资助，资助(KL2;TR003108和UL1 TR003107)通过国家卫生研究院推进转化科学中心和国家老龄化研究所的K76AG074920获得。
{"title":"Examining physical activity participation barriers among adults 50 years and older: a scoping review","authors":"Mariana Wingood, Michelle G. Criss, Kent E. Irwin, Patricia M. Bamonti, Rebekah Harris, Emma L. Phillips, Jennifer L. Vincenzo, Kevin K. Chui","doi":"10.1080/10833196.2023.2265767","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2023.2265767","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractBackground Addressing physical activity (PA) barriers is essential for increasing PA levels in middle-aged and older adults. However, there are no recommendations on selecting PA barrier assessment tools.Objectives Thus, we aimed to identify and provide clinimetric properties on PA barrier assessment tools that healthcare providers, exercise experts, and public health officials can use to examine potential barriers faced by community-dwelling adults 50 years and older.Methods We performed a systematic search of the following databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Articles were included if they presented clinimetric data on a PA participation barrier assessment tool for community-dwelling participants with a mean age of 50 years and older. The 561 identified articles underwent multiple rounds of blinded reviews. Included articles underwent data extraction for participant characteristics, scoring, constructs, reference tests, and clinimetric properties.Results The 35 included articles reported on 33 different PA participation barrier assessment tools. Eighteen articles reported on participants with cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, or neurological diagnoses, diabetes, hemodialysis, history of cancer, or mobility limitations. Tools with two or more supporting publications included the Exercise Benefits/Barrier Scale (EBBS), Episode-Specific Interpretations of Exercise Inventory (ESIE), and Inventory of Physical Activity and Barriers (IPAB). Due to differences in methodologies, across-tool comparison was not possible.Conclusion The EBBS, ESIE, and IPAB are promising tools for community-dwelling adults 50 years and older. However, additional research is warranted to identify the best PA barrier assessment tool among adults 50 years and older.Keywords: Physical activitybarriersolder adultsprimary prevention AcknowledgementsWe would like to acknowledge the contributions made by Nancy Bianchi, a librarian at the University of Vermont, for her guidance on identifying appropriate search terms and for completing the searches.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingDr. Vincenzo was supported by the Translational Research Institute (TRI), grant (KL2; TR003108 and UL1 TR003107) through the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health and K76AG074920 from the National Institute on Aging.","PeriodicalId":46541,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135854409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-10DOI: 10.1080/10833196.2023.2266320
Emma O’Loughlin, Duncan Reid, Stacy Sims
Background Strength deficits are common following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Best practice guidelines recommend resistance training post-ACLR to target these strength deficits. Research has supported menstrual cycle (MC) phase-based resistance training for eumenorrheic women, however its applicability for women post-ACLR was unknown.
{"title":"The role of menstrual cycle phase-based resistance training for women post anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a scoping review","authors":"Emma O’Loughlin, Duncan Reid, Stacy Sims","doi":"10.1080/10833196.2023.2266320","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2023.2266320","url":null,"abstract":"Background Strength deficits are common following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Best practice guidelines recommend resistance training post-ACLR to target these strength deficits. Research has supported menstrual cycle (MC) phase-based resistance training for eumenorrheic women, however its applicability for women post-ACLR was unknown.","PeriodicalId":46541,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136294617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
AbstractBackground Geotropic horizontal canal BPPV may be effectively treated using roll maneuvers or side-lying maneuvers. Forced prolonged position (FPP), initially described in 1997, may be used alone or in conjunction with these roll maneuvers or side-lying maneuvers in the treatment of geotropic horizontal canal BPPV.Objectives The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of FPP for the treatment of geotropic horizontal canal BPPV.Methods A literature search was conducted using CINAHL Complete, ProQuest Medical Database, PubMed, Web of Science, and Wiley Online Library as the databases. The search terms applied were geotropic AND (horizontal OR lateral) AND vertigo AND (‘forced prolonged position’ OR ‘forced prolonged positioning’).Results The efficacy of FPP ranged between 73.0% and 100.0% for the resolution of the vertigo and/or nystagmus associated with geotropic horizontal canal BPPV. FPP appears to be a more suitable intervention than roll maneuvers for individuals with physical impairments such as age-related limitations, obesity, neck pain, back pain, and/or other musculoskeletal disorders. Although the Gufoni maneuver, the most common side-lying maneuver, requires much less time to perform than FPP and may be more appropriate for those individuals who are unable to maintain a side-lying position for a prolonged period, the quick movements required for the performance of this intervention can elicit severe neurovegetative symptoms.Conclusions Therapists should consider using FPP with individuals who have been diagnosed with geotropic horizontal canal BPPV. FPP might be effective if used independently or in combination with another intervention, such as the Gufoni maneuver.Keywords: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigoBPPVforced prolonged positiongeotropichorizontal canal Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThe author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.
摘要背景地向性水平管BPPV可通过横摇或侧躺两种方法有效治疗。1997年首次描述的强制延长体位(FPP)可以单独使用，也可以与这些滚转操作或侧躺操作联合使用，用于治疗各向大地水平管BPPV。目的本系统综述的目的是确定FPP治疗各向异性水平管BPPV的有效性。方法采用CINAHL Complete、ProQuest Medical Database、PubMed、Web of Science、Wiley Online Library等数据库进行文献检索。使用的搜索词是地向性和(水平或横向)和眩晕和(“被迫延长位置”或“被迫延长位置”)。结果FPP治疗各向异性水平管BPPV伴发眩晕和/或眼球震颤的有效率在73.0% ~ 100.0%之间。对于有身体缺陷的个体，如年龄相关的限制、肥胖、颈痛、背痛和/或其他肌肉骨骼疾病，FPP似乎是比滚动操作更合适的干预措施。虽然最常见的侧卧手法Gufoni手法所需的时间比FPP要少得多，而且可能更适合那些无法长时间保持侧卧姿势的人，但这种干预措施所需的快速运动可能会引起严重的神经植物症状。结论:治疗师应考虑对诊断为向地性水平管BPPV的患者使用FPP。如果单独使用或与其他干预措施(如Gufoni手法)联合使用，FPP可能有效。关键词:良性阵发性体位性眩晕ppv强迫延长体位地热带水平管披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。其他信息资金作者报告没有与本文所述工作相关的资金。
{"title":"Effectiveness of forced prolonged position for geotropic horizontal canal BPPV: a systematic review","authors":"Bonni Lynn Kinne, Haley Jeanne Anderson, Blair Cristylyn Cremerius, Sylvia Mirai Staltmanis","doi":"10.1080/10833196.2023.2258714","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2023.2258714","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractBackground Geotropic horizontal canal BPPV may be effectively treated using roll maneuvers or side-lying maneuvers. Forced prolonged position (FPP), initially described in 1997, may be used alone or in conjunction with these roll maneuvers or side-lying maneuvers in the treatment of geotropic horizontal canal BPPV.Objectives The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of FPP for the treatment of geotropic horizontal canal BPPV.Methods A literature search was conducted using CINAHL Complete, ProQuest Medical Database, PubMed, Web of Science, and Wiley Online Library as the databases. The search terms applied were geotropic AND (horizontal OR lateral) AND vertigo AND (‘forced prolonged position’ OR ‘forced prolonged positioning’).Results The efficacy of FPP ranged between 73.0% and 100.0% for the resolution of the vertigo and/or nystagmus associated with geotropic horizontal canal BPPV. FPP appears to be a more suitable intervention than roll maneuvers for individuals with physical impairments such as age-related limitations, obesity, neck pain, back pain, and/or other musculoskeletal disorders. Although the Gufoni maneuver, the most common side-lying maneuver, requires much less time to perform than FPP and may be more appropriate for those individuals who are unable to maintain a side-lying position for a prolonged period, the quick movements required for the performance of this intervention can elicit severe neurovegetative symptoms.Conclusions Therapists should consider using FPP with individuals who have been diagnosed with geotropic horizontal canal BPPV. FPP might be effective if used independently or in combination with another intervention, such as the Gufoni maneuver.Keywords: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigoBPPVforced prolonged positiongeotropichorizontal canal Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThe author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.","PeriodicalId":46541,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136306904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-09DOI: 10.1080/10833196.2023.2243581
Emma Sutton, U. Rahman, E. Karasouli, Heather J. MacKinnon, Anand Radhakrishnan, M. Renna, A. Metcalfe
Abstract Background THR and TKR patients represent one of the largest groups of surgical patients globally, yet we do not know how to optimise pre-operative care to improve post-operative outcomes. Objective To clarify the effect of pre-operative prehabilitation interventions such as exercise, neuromuscular stimulation, and psychological therapies on outcomes for hip (THR) and knee (TKR) replacement patients. Methods We used PRISMA guidelines and guidelines by Smith and colleagues on conducting reviews of reviews. Searches were conducted on Medline, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE). Additional hand searches were also conducted. Articles were selected based on inclusion criteria and we report meta-analyses of data by outcome measures. Major Findings 6848 articles were screened and the full text of 33 reviews were obtained. Twenty systematic reviews were included, containing 67 unique randomised controlled trials. In 70% of the reviews (14/20), intervention fidelity was not reported. The components of prehabilitation that were tested were: exercise, education, nutrition, acupuncture and neuromuscular stimulation. Exercise alone did not affect functional outcome for TKR patients, but it did affect activity levels prior to THR, and pain prior to THR and TKR. Exercise alone may reduce Length of Stay (by between 0.8 and 4 days). Education when combined with exercise can reduce Length of Stay for TKR patients. Relaxation did not affect function or length of stay but gave a modest reduction of pain. Conclusions Providing education alongside exercise as a pre-operative intervention may reduce Length of Stay. One small RCT combined all three elements of exercise, education and dietary advice and there is no robust evidence to determine whether combining these elements can influence functional outcome.
{"title":"Do pre-operative therapeutic interventions affect outcome in people undergoing hip and knee joint replacement? A systematic analysis of systematic reviews","authors":"Emma Sutton, U. Rahman, E. Karasouli, Heather J. MacKinnon, Anand Radhakrishnan, M. Renna, A. Metcalfe","doi":"10.1080/10833196.2023.2243581","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2023.2243581","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background THR and TKR patients represent one of the largest groups of surgical patients globally, yet we do not know how to optimise pre-operative care to improve post-operative outcomes. Objective To clarify the effect of pre-operative prehabilitation interventions such as exercise, neuromuscular stimulation, and psychological therapies on outcomes for hip (THR) and knee (TKR) replacement patients. Methods We used PRISMA guidelines and guidelines by Smith and colleagues on conducting reviews of reviews. Searches were conducted on Medline, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE). Additional hand searches were also conducted. Articles were selected based on inclusion criteria and we report meta-analyses of data by outcome measures. Major Findings 6848 articles were screened and the full text of 33 reviews were obtained. Twenty systematic reviews were included, containing 67 unique randomised controlled trials. In 70% of the reviews (14/20), intervention fidelity was not reported. The components of prehabilitation that were tested were: exercise, education, nutrition, acupuncture and neuromuscular stimulation. Exercise alone did not affect functional outcome for TKR patients, but it did affect activity levels prior to THR, and pain prior to THR and TKR. Exercise alone may reduce Length of Stay (by between 0.8 and 4 days). Education when combined with exercise can reduce Length of Stay for TKR patients. Relaxation did not affect function or length of stay but gave a modest reduction of pain. Conclusions Providing education alongside exercise as a pre-operative intervention may reduce Length of Stay. One small RCT combined all three elements of exercise, education and dietary advice and there is no robust evidence to determine whether combining these elements can influence functional outcome.","PeriodicalId":46541,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47182543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-24DOI: 10.1080/10833196.2023.2226364
Tara Dickson, Tawna Wilkinson, Kim D. Dao, L. Woodhouse, E. Hegedus, A. Gisselman
Abstract Objective We aim to collate and analyze current evidence for implementing cultural safety measures among patients, health professionals, in the education of health professionals, and within healthcare organizations. A second aim is to understand how to best assess the effectiveness of cultural safety interventions. Our third aim is to provide guidance on how culturally safe environments can be implemented in the US healthcare system. Introduction Culturally safe environments can improve health inequities among underrepresented groups. However, there is a paucity of evidence on how cultural safety can be implemented among patients, health professionals, in the education of health professionals, and within healthcare organizations in the United States (US). Inclusion criteria This scoping review will examine the US and international literature on cultural safety implemented by healthcare professionals and the experiences of their patients; educational interventions to improve cultural safety in health professional education; and the organization and systems-level initiatives that create culturally safe environments. Physician groups will not be included as power differentials between physician groups and patients are different from those among other health professionals and patients. Due to the wealth of experience and cultural safety literature in this area from countries outside of the US, international studies will be included. Methods This review will search national and international literature to inform cultural safety practices in the US and will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology and PRISMA-ScR extension. Key search sources will include CINAHL, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Social Work Abstracts, and GoogleScholar from 1988–2022. Reviewed sources will be in English and will include unpublished studies and grey literature. All sources will be reviewed by at least two independent reviewers, with a third independent reviewer to achieve consensus when necessary. Results will be presented in alignment with the four conceptual layers that create culturally safe environments: patients, health professionals, health professionals’ education, and healthcare organizations and systems. Dissemination This scoping review aims to collect, analyze, and disseminate an extensive overview of cultural safety in healthcare to inform guidance on how best to implement culturally safe healthcare and education for health professionals in the US.
{"title":"An opportunity for transformative change in the US Healthcare System—cultural safety: a scoping review protocol","authors":"Tara Dickson, Tawna Wilkinson, Kim D. Dao, L. Woodhouse, E. Hegedus, A. Gisselman","doi":"10.1080/10833196.2023.2226364","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2023.2226364","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective We aim to collate and analyze current evidence for implementing cultural safety measures among patients, health professionals, in the education of health professionals, and within healthcare organizations. A second aim is to understand how to best assess the effectiveness of cultural safety interventions. Our third aim is to provide guidance on how culturally safe environments can be implemented in the US healthcare system. Introduction Culturally safe environments can improve health inequities among underrepresented groups. However, there is a paucity of evidence on how cultural safety can be implemented among patients, health professionals, in the education of health professionals, and within healthcare organizations in the United States (US). Inclusion criteria This scoping review will examine the US and international literature on cultural safety implemented by healthcare professionals and the experiences of their patients; educational interventions to improve cultural safety in health professional education; and the organization and systems-level initiatives that create culturally safe environments. Physician groups will not be included as power differentials between physician groups and patients are different from those among other health professionals and patients. Due to the wealth of experience and cultural safety literature in this area from countries outside of the US, international studies will be included. Methods This review will search national and international literature to inform cultural safety practices in the US and will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology and PRISMA-ScR extension. Key search sources will include CINAHL, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Social Work Abstracts, and GoogleScholar from 1988–2022. Reviewed sources will be in English and will include unpublished studies and grey literature. All sources will be reviewed by at least two independent reviewers, with a third independent reviewer to achieve consensus when necessary. Results will be presented in alignment with the four conceptual layers that create culturally safe environments: patients, health professionals, health professionals’ education, and healthcare organizations and systems. Dissemination This scoping review aims to collect, analyze, and disseminate an extensive overview of cultural safety in healthcare to inform guidance on how best to implement culturally safe healthcare and education for health professionals in the US.","PeriodicalId":46541,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44076914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-30DOI: 10.1080/10833196.2023.2192620
Zohreh Jafarian Tangrood, Angela Spontelli Gisselman, G. Sole, Daniel Cury Ribeiro
Abstract Objective To assess the clinical course of pain and function in patients with subacromial pain. Design Systematic review. Methods We searched Medline, Embase, AMED, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus for randomized clinical trials and observational studies recruiting participants with subacromial pain. Pain and function scores were extracted for groups receiving either ‘no intervention’ or ‘usual care’. Changes in pain and function from baseline were pooled at 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up. Random effects meta-analyses and meta-regression were performed to assess the clinical course of pain and function in subacromial pain. Results Nineteen studies were included and 17 studies were pooled. Data from 5 studies in the ‘no intervention’ group were pooled to 3 months, showing minimal improvement for pain (mean difference, MD, 5.3/100, 95%CI −0.8 to 11.4) and function (MD 3.1/100, 95%CI −1.7 to 7.9). Data from 12 studies in ‘usual care’ group were pooled to 12 months, showing significant improvement for pain (MD 32.5/100, 95%CI 22.6 to 42.3) and function (MD 30.3/100, 95%CI 24.4 to 36.1), with approximately 40% of this gain in the first 6 weeks. Conclusion With ‘no intervention’, participants with subacromial pain are unlikely to show changes for pain and function within 3 months. For participants receiving ‘usual care’, recovery continued up to 12 months with almost 40% of this change during the first 6 weeks of care. Individuals with subacromial pain who received ‘usual care’ may have moderate changes in terms of minimal clinical important differences up to 12 months. PROSPERO registration number CRD42016052518.
{"title":"Clinical course of pain and function in subacromial shoulder pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis","authors":"Zohreh Jafarian Tangrood, Angela Spontelli Gisselman, G. Sole, Daniel Cury Ribeiro","doi":"10.1080/10833196.2023.2192620","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2023.2192620","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective To assess the clinical course of pain and function in patients with subacromial pain. Design Systematic review. Methods We searched Medline, Embase, AMED, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus for randomized clinical trials and observational studies recruiting participants with subacromial pain. Pain and function scores were extracted for groups receiving either ‘no intervention’ or ‘usual care’. Changes in pain and function from baseline were pooled at 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up. Random effects meta-analyses and meta-regression were performed to assess the clinical course of pain and function in subacromial pain. Results Nineteen studies were included and 17 studies were pooled. Data from 5 studies in the ‘no intervention’ group were pooled to 3 months, showing minimal improvement for pain (mean difference, MD, 5.3/100, 95%CI −0.8 to 11.4) and function (MD 3.1/100, 95%CI −1.7 to 7.9). Data from 12 studies in ‘usual care’ group were pooled to 12 months, showing significant improvement for pain (MD 32.5/100, 95%CI 22.6 to 42.3) and function (MD 30.3/100, 95%CI 24.4 to 36.1), with approximately 40% of this gain in the first 6 weeks. Conclusion With ‘no intervention’, participants with subacromial pain are unlikely to show changes for pain and function within 3 months. For participants receiving ‘usual care’, recovery continued up to 12 months with almost 40% of this change during the first 6 weeks of care. Individuals with subacromial pain who received ‘usual care’ may have moderate changes in terms of minimal clinical important differences up to 12 months. PROSPERO registration number CRD42016052518.","PeriodicalId":46541,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48247392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：