Urban Design International最新文献

英文中文

Emerging knowledge on the social dimension of urban design 关于城市设计的社会维度的新兴知识

3区经济学 Q1 Social Sciences

Urban Design International

Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI: 10.1057/s41289-023-00234-z

Patricia Aelbrecht, Mahyar Arefi

引用次数: 0

Behavioral designs defined: how to understand and why it is important to differentiate between “defensive,” “hostile,” “disciplinary”, and other designs in the urban landscape 行为设计定义:如何理解以及为什么区分城市景观中的“防御性”、“敌意”、“纪律”和其他设计很重要

3区经济学 Q1 Social Sciences

Urban Design International

Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI: 10.1057/s41289-023-00231-2

Karl de Fine Licht

Abstract In recent years, a growing discussion about how we should design our cities has emerged, particularly for the more controversial modes of design such as “defensive,” “hostile,” or “disciplinary” architecture (i.e., benches on which one cannot sleep, or metal studs on which one cannot skate). Although this debate is relatively mature, many studies have argued that these design notions are undertheorized and are, thus, challenging to study from an empirical and normative perspective. In this paper, I will define the most common terms used in the literature and show how they are interconnected by utilizing a set of “conditions of adequacy” from philosophy to facilitate a more transparent and well-grounded discussion of them. Terms such as “hostile” and “defensive” design are underlined by several different phenomena, not just one as is sometimes commonly assumed. I will also show that these phenomena and their conceptualizations require—and sometimes force us to use—different moral reasons when justifying the utilization of different designs.

近年来，关于我们应该如何设计我们的城市的讨论越来越多，特别是对于更具争议的设计模式，如“防御性”，“敌意”或“纪律”建筑(即不能在上面睡觉的长椅，或者不能在上面滑冰的金属钉)。尽管这一争论相对成熟，但许多研究认为，这些设计概念的理论化程度较低，因此，从经验和规范的角度进行研究具有挑战性。在本文中，我将定义文献中使用的最常见术语，并通过利用哲学中的一组“充足条件”来展示它们如何相互关联，以促进对它们的更透明和有充分根据的讨论。像“敌意”和“防御性”设计这样的术语是由几种不同的现象所强调的，而不是像有时通常假设的那样只有一种。我还将说明，这些现象及其概念化要求——有时迫使我们使用——不同的道德理由来证明使用不同设计的合理性。

{"title":"Behavioral designs defined: how to understand and why it is important to differentiate between “defensive,” “hostile,” “disciplinary”, and other designs in the urban landscape","authors":"Karl de Fine Licht","doi":"10.1057/s41289-023-00231-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-023-00231-2","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In recent years, a growing discussion about how we should design our cities has emerged, particularly for the more controversial modes of design such as “defensive,” “hostile,” or “disciplinary” architecture (i.e., benches on which one cannot sleep, or metal studs on which one cannot skate). Although this debate is relatively mature, many studies have argued that these design notions are undertheorized and are, thus, challenging to study from an empirical and normative perspective. In this paper, I will define the most common terms used in the literature and show how they are interconnected by utilizing a set of “conditions of adequacy” from philosophy to facilitate a more transparent and well-grounded discussion of them. Terms such as “hostile” and “defensive” design are underlined by several different phenomena, not just one as is sometimes commonly assumed. I will also show that these phenomena and their conceptualizations require—and sometimes force us to use—different moral reasons when justifying the utilization of different designs.","PeriodicalId":46557,"journal":{"name":"Urban Design International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136068445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Successful criteria for placemaking process in contested spaces: evaluation of non-governmental organisations at Ledra Street Crossing Point in Nicosia 在有争议的空间中建立场所过程的成功标准:对尼科西亚莱德拉街过境点非政府组织的评估

3区经济学 Q1 Social Sciences

Urban Design International

Pub Date : 2023-09-21 DOI: 10.1057/s41289-023-00230-3

Ediz Orac, Ugur Ulas Dagli

As adivided capital city, Nicosia and its Buffer Zone have attracted attention across political, social, cultural, and academic spheres since the 1974 division of Cyprus. The Buffer Zone's physical and symbolic presence reflects the ongoing struggle for reunification and the challenges of tension in a confined space. The crossing points in the Buffer Zone serve as bridges, facilitating movement and interaction between the communities. Thus, contested spaces require comprehensive, context-sensitive approaches that foster inclusive dialogues, and seek innovative spatial arrangements to promote sustainable peace and shared understanding. The paper proposes a placemaking process approach that serves as a transformative tool to tackle the difficulties associated with contested spaces and strive towards their comprehensive revitalisation. 126 different NGOs participated as stakeholders in the Ledra Street Crossing Point and answered the Likert scale survey after the reliability check. The aim of this paper is to identify a successful placemaking process diagram for contested spaces as an analytical framework. The diagram establishes important criteria and their correlations for the placemaking process. It identifies sociability alongside uses and activities as key imperatives for successful placemaking process in contested contexts: social networks, sharing space use, multifunctionality, and public space usage.

作为分裂的首都，尼科西亚及其缓冲地带自1974年塞浦路斯分裂以来一直受到政治、社会、文化和学术领域的关注。缓冲区的实际存在和象征性存在反映了正在进行的争取统一的斗争和有限空间内紧张局势的挑战。缓冲区的过境点充当桥梁，促进社区之间的行动和互动。因此，有争议的空间需要全面的、对环境敏感的方法，以促进包容性对话，并寻求创新的空间安排，以促进可持续和平和共同理解。本文提出了一种场所制作过程方法，作为一种变革性的工具来解决与有争议的空间相关的困难，并努力实现它们的全面振兴。126个不同的非政府组织作为利益相关者参与了莱德拉街过境点，并在信度检验后回答了李克特量表调查。本文的目的是为有争议的空间确定一个成功的场所制作过程图作为分析框架。该图建立了重要的标准和它们之间的相关性。它将社交性与使用和活动一起确定为在有争议的环境中成功创建场所的关键要素:社交网络、共享空间使用、多功能和公共空间使用。

{"title":"Successful criteria for placemaking process in contested spaces: evaluation of non-governmental organisations at Ledra Street Crossing Point in Nicosia","authors":"Ediz Orac, Ugur Ulas Dagli","doi":"10.1057/s41289-023-00230-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-023-00230-3","url":null,"abstract":"As adivided capital city, Nicosia and its Buffer Zone have attracted attention across political, social, cultural, and academic spheres since the 1974 division of Cyprus. The Buffer Zone's physical and symbolic presence reflects the ongoing struggle for reunification and the challenges of tension in a confined space. The crossing points in the Buffer Zone serve as bridges, facilitating movement and interaction between the communities. Thus, contested spaces require comprehensive, context-sensitive approaches that foster inclusive dialogues, and seek innovative spatial arrangements to promote sustainable peace and shared understanding. The paper proposes a placemaking process approach that serves as a transformative tool to tackle the difficulties associated with contested spaces and strive towards their comprehensive revitalisation. 126 different NGOs participated as stakeholders in the Ledra Street Crossing Point and answered the Likert scale survey after the reliability check. The aim of this paper is to identify a successful placemaking process diagram for contested spaces as an analytical framework. The diagram establishes important criteria and their correlations for the placemaking process. It identifies sociability alongside uses and activities as key imperatives for successful placemaking process in contested contexts: social networks, sharing space use, multifunctionality, and public space usage.","PeriodicalId":46557,"journal":{"name":"Urban Design International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136154162","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

UDI editorial: designing green and blue infrastructure UDI社论:设计绿色和蓝色基础设施