Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2023.2243122
H. Silva, P. Lehoux, R. P. Sabio
{"title":"Mobilizing capital for responsible innovation: the role of social finance in supporting innovative projects","authors":"H. Silva, P. Lehoux, R. P. Sabio","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2023.2243122","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2023.2243122","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46727,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86746683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2023.2217594
Fujia Li, R. Owen, G. Shaw
{"title":"Framings of innovation, responsibility, and responsible innovation in China: insights from a case study undertaken with Chinese businesses","authors":"Fujia Li, R. Owen, G. Shaw","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2023.2217594","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2023.2217594","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46727,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81393309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2023.2249751
Anna Mann, Luca Chiapperino
How can critique in responsible innovation (RI) become generative? The anything-but-neutral relations between science, technology and society, at the core of science and technology studies, have led to the development of different repertoires of critique. None of them fitted the configurations in the biomedical practices we came to study. There, biomedical experts presented us with an analysis of the power relations perpetuated through the mainstream practices in their fields and had built socio-material alternatives to the common forms of practicing biomedicine. The paper suggests conceptualising critical observations voiced by experts embedded into socio-material alternatives as ‘critique from within’ yielding collateral goods and bads. Rather than asking how to foster responsibility conditions in RI, the paper suggests modestly reclaiming critique by articulating already existing forms of responsibility practices developed by experts themselves and analysing the ambivalent effects they engender.
{"title":"Critiques from within. A modest proposal for reclaiming critique for responsible innovation","authors":"Anna Mann, Luca Chiapperino","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2023.2249751","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2023.2249751","url":null,"abstract":"How can critique in responsible innovation (RI) become generative? The anything-but-neutral relations between science, technology and society, at the core of science and technology studies, have led to the development of different repertoires of critique. None of them fitted the configurations in the biomedical practices we came to study. There, biomedical experts presented us with an analysis of the power relations perpetuated through the mainstream practices in their fields and had built socio-material alternatives to the common forms of practicing biomedicine. The paper suggests conceptualising critical observations voiced by experts embedded into socio-material alternatives as ‘critique from within’ yielding collateral goods and bads. Rather than asking how to foster responsibility conditions in RI, the paper suggests modestly reclaiming critique by articulating already existing forms of responsibility practices developed by experts themselves and analysing the ambivalent effects they engender.","PeriodicalId":46727,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135799424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2023.2243080
Ellen-Marie Forsberg, Matteo Corciolani, Julia Szulecka, N. Strøm‐Andersen
{"title":"Widening the scope of responsible innovation: food waste and the role of consumers","authors":"Ellen-Marie Forsberg, Matteo Corciolani, Julia Szulecka, N. Strøm‐Andersen","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2023.2243080","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2023.2243080","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46727,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","volume":"885 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78193143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2023.2257074
Carmine Passavanti, C. Ponsiglione, S. Primario, P. Rippa
This study explores the role of NGOs in Innovation Value Chains (IVCs) and Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). It investigates how NGOs' presence influences RRI adoption in ecosystems and whether their strong RRI focus enhances its diffusion. Agent-Based Modelling and Simulation are employed for analysis. Findings reveal that NGOs promote RRI when adopting intermediate RRI values for consortium evaluation, whereas strict criteria hinder RRI diffusion. Highly RRI-oriented NGOs foster knowledge dissemination and network diversity, despite limited IVC involvement. These insights offer guidance for Research Funding Organizations to promote RRI and assist Research Performing Organizations in managing dynamic innovative networks.
{"title":"Responsible research and innovation in innovation value chains: focus on the catalytic role of non-governmental organizations","authors":"Carmine Passavanti, C. Ponsiglione, S. Primario, P. Rippa","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2023.2257074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2023.2257074","url":null,"abstract":"This study explores the role of NGOs in Innovation Value Chains (IVCs) and Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). It investigates how NGOs' presence influences RRI adoption in ecosystems and whether their strong RRI focus enhances its diffusion. Agent-Based Modelling and Simulation are employed for analysis. Findings reveal that NGOs promote RRI when adopting intermediate RRI values for consortium evaluation, whereas strict criteria hinder RRI diffusion. Highly RRI-oriented NGOs foster knowledge dissemination and network diversity, despite limited IVC involvement. These insights offer guidance for Research Funding Organizations to promote RRI and assist Research Performing Organizations in managing dynamic innovative networks.","PeriodicalId":46727,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135798740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2023.2222514
Andrés Domínguez Hernández, Richard Owen, Dan Saattrup Nielsen, Ryan McConville
Machine learning (ML) enabled classification models are becoming increasingly popular for tackling the sheer volume and speed of online misinformation and other content that could be identified as harmful. In building these models, data scientists need to take a stance on the legitimacy, authoritativeness and objectivity of the sources of “truth” used for model training and testing. This has political, ethical and epistemic implications which are rarely addressed in technical papers. Despite (and due to) their reported high accuracy and performance, ML-driven moderation systems have the potential to shape online public debate and create downstream negative impacts such as undue censorship and the reinforcing of false beliefs. Using collaborative ethnography and theoretical insights from social studies of science and expertise, we offer a critical analysis of the process of building ML models for (mis)information classification: we identify a series of algorithmic contingencies—key moments during model development that could lead to different future outcomes, uncertainty and harmful effects as these tools are deployed by social media platforms. We conclude by offering a tentative path toward reflexive and responsible development of ML tools for moderating misinformation and other harmful content online.
{"title":"Ethical, political and epistemic implications of machine learning (mis)information classification: insights from an interdisciplinary collaboration between social and data scientists","authors":"Andrés Domínguez Hernández, Richard Owen, Dan Saattrup Nielsen, Ryan McConville","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2023.2222514","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2023.2222514","url":null,"abstract":"Machine learning (ML) enabled classification models are becoming increasingly popular for tackling the sheer volume and speed of online misinformation and other content that could be identified as harmful. In building these models, data scientists need to take a stance on the legitimacy, authoritativeness and objectivity of the sources of “truth” used for model training and testing. This has political, ethical and epistemic implications which are rarely addressed in technical papers. Despite (and due to) their reported high accuracy and performance, ML-driven moderation systems have the potential to shape online public debate and create downstream negative impacts such as undue censorship and the reinforcing of false beliefs. Using collaborative ethnography and theoretical insights from social studies of science and expertise, we offer a critical analysis of the process of building ML models for (mis)information classification: we identify a series of algorithmic contingencies—key moments during model development that could lead to different future outcomes, uncertainty and harmful effects as these tools are deployed by social media platforms. We conclude by offering a tentative path toward reflexive and responsible development of ML tools for moderating misinformation and other harmful content online.","PeriodicalId":46727,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76053265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2023.2233234
I. Monsonís-Payá, E. Iñigo, V. Blok
{"title":"Participation in monitoring and evaluation for RRI: a review of procedural approaches developing monitoring and evaluation mechanisms","authors":"I. Monsonís-Payá, E. Iñigo, V. Blok","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2023.2233234","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2023.2233234","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46727,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78300863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2023.2243121
Thomas A. Hemphill
{"title":"The ‘Metaverse’ and the challenge of responsible standards development","authors":"Thomas A. Hemphill","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2023.2243121","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2023.2243121","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46727,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","volume":"133 8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82964574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2023.2235931
U. Felt, Susanne Öchsner, Robin Rae, E. Osipova
{"title":"Doing co-creation: power and critique in the development of a European health data infrastructure","authors":"U. Felt, Susanne Öchsner, Robin Rae, E. Osipova","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2023.2235931","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2023.2235931","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46727,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79624534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2023.2258631
Felix Ouko Opola, Laurens Klerkx, Cees Leeuwis, Catherine W. Kilelu
In recent decades, the concept of inclusive innovation has been used to refer to how innovation can include actors that are considered marginalised from its processes and outcomes. Contrary to the ‘expert-driven’ approaches prevalent in evaluating the legitimacy of such processes, this paper examines the legitimacy of inclusive innovation from the perspective of smallholder farmers with little resource endowments in Uasin Gishu, Kenya, that are targeted with various agricultural innovation interventions. Findings indicate that procedural aspects of legitimacy, such as including farmers as co-innovators and including their knowledge and skills in agricultural innovation processes, are an important criterion used by targeted farmers to accord legitimacy to such interventions. We also find that such interventions need to be stable over time to be legitimate to the intended beneficiaries. These criteria used by targeted actors can be an important addition to evaluation procedures and methods for inclusive innovation.
{"title":"Examining the legitimacy of inclusive innovation processes: perspectives from smallholder farmers in Uasin Gishu, Kenya","authors":"Felix Ouko Opola, Laurens Klerkx, Cees Leeuwis, Catherine W. Kilelu","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2023.2258631","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2023.2258631","url":null,"abstract":"In recent decades, the concept of inclusive innovation has been used to refer to how innovation can include actors that are considered marginalised from its processes and outcomes. Contrary to the ‘expert-driven’ approaches prevalent in evaluating the legitimacy of such processes, this paper examines the legitimacy of inclusive innovation from the perspective of smallholder farmers with little resource endowments in Uasin Gishu, Kenya, that are targeted with various agricultural innovation interventions. Findings indicate that procedural aspects of legitimacy, such as including farmers as co-innovators and including their knowledge and skills in agricultural innovation processes, are an important criterion used by targeted farmers to accord legitimacy to such interventions. We also find that such interventions need to be stable over time to be legitimate to the intended beneficiaries. These criteria used by targeted actors can be an important addition to evaluation procedures and methods for inclusive innovation.","PeriodicalId":46727,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135798741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：