Patient Safety in Surgery最新文献

Background: Hospital-acquired pressure injuries are a major patient safety concern in intensive care units that are considered largely preventable adverse events by adherence to nursing standards of care. The hypothesis of this research was to investigate the prevalence of hospital-acquired pressure injuries in intensive care units (ICUs) of the Eastern Mediterranean Region.

Methods: This study was designed as a systematic review and meta-analysis. All articles published on Pressure ulcer prevalence in the ICUs of hospitals in Eastern Mediterranean Region countries, identified by searching PubMed through MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar from January 1, 2011, until September 22, 2023. The reference lists of these articles were checked for additional relevant studies. Data were analyzed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software (v.2.2.064).

Results: A total of 15 articles met the inclusion criteria. Based on the random-effects model, the overall Pressure ulcer prevalence rate was 16.6% (95% CI (8.6-29.6)). Both the highest and lowest prevalence was observed in Jordan in 2011 at 83.1% (95% CI (71.2- 90.7)) and in 2012 at 0.9% (95% CI (0.5- 1.5)), respectively. The results showed that publication year, average age, and sample size were the main causes of heterogeneity between the reviewed studies (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis of the pertinent peer-reviewed literature revealed a high prevalence of hospital-acquired pressure injuries of 16% in intensive care units of Eastern Mediterranean region. Therefore, it is necessary for health policymakers and managers in Eastern Mediterranean Region to take necessary measures to prevent the incidence of Pressure ulcers in hospitals, especially in ICUs.

Background: Preoperative anemia is a common hematologic problem in major orthopedic surgery in developing countries. It is a condition in which the number and size of red blood cells are insufficient to meet the body's physiologic needs, consequently impairing the capacity of the blood to transport oxygen to the body. Preoperative anemia is common in elective orthopedic surgical patients and is an independent risk factor for perioperative morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to assess preoperative anemia prevalence and risk factors in patients undergoing elective orthopedic procedures.

Method: A multicenter prospective observational cohort study was conducted from June 01 to August 30, 2022. A systematic random sampling technique was used to select the study unit. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were expressed in percentages and presented with tables and figures. Binary logistic regression was used to see the association between independent and dependent variables. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Result: Preoperative anemia's prevalence and risk factors in patients undergoing elective orthopedic procedures was 24.1[95%CI= (18.2-30.6)]. Multivariable logistic analyses showed that low monthly income level [AOR:5,95%CI:(1.36-7.98)], patient with cancer [AOR:3.4,95%CI:(3.7-8.84)], patient with malaria infectious [AOR: 3.2,95%CI:( 1.13-8.91)], patient with anti-retroviral therapy [AOR: 5.2,95%CI:( 1.8-11.04)], and previous history of surgery [AOR:1,95%CI(1.43-2.4)], were factors significantly associated with preoperative anemia.

Conclusion: The prevalence of preoperative anemia among adult patients who underwent elective orthopedics procedures was high. Low Monthly income, patients with cancer, patient with malaria infection, and patients with anti-retroviral therapy, previous histories of surgery were found significantly associated with preoperative anemia. So, we recommend to health professional's early identification, diagnosis and treatment of preoperative anemia should be done to reduce the risks of anemia and related adverse outcomes.

Background: The percutaneous iliosacral screw technique represents a global standard fixation method for unstable fractures of the posterior pelvic ring. However, the inaccurate positioning of iliosacral screws is associated with a significant risk of severe intra-operative complications. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between the skin entry point of the transverse iliosacral screw of the first sacral vertebral body and the anterior superior iliac spine and the greater trochanter of the femur using computed-tomography-guided validation.

Methods: Overall, 91 consecutive patients admitted to a tertiary referral center in China for posterior pelvic ring fixation via the "triangulation method" using computed-tomography-guided validation between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020, were included in this retrospective observational cohort study. Modeling and simulated iliosacral screw placement were performed using the Mimics software. The distance between the three points of interest was measured, and their relationship in a rectangular coordinate system was determined. Patients were categorized according to gender, body mass index, and femoral rotation angle to investigate the factors affecting the positional relationship between the three points.

Results: An equilateral triangular relationship was observed between the positioning points of the transverse iliosacral screw, anterior iliac spine, and greater trochanter. Additionally, 95% of the entry points were within a circle radius centered 12 mm at the apex of an equilateral triangle comprising the anterior superior iliac spine and the greater trochanter as the base. The entry point in the femoral external rotation was more dorsal than that in the internal femoral rotation. Furthermore, the entry point in females was more rostral than that in males, and the entry point in overweight patients was more dorsal than that in normal-weight patients.

Conclusions: The skin entry point of the percutaneous iliosacral screw can be located by drawing an equilateral triangle from the anterior superior iliac spine and the greater trochanter as the base to the dorsum end of the patient's head. In summary, this retrospective cohort study validated the safety and efficacy of the "triangulation methods" for percutaneous fixation of unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries.

Background: Early management for adnexal torsion increases likelihood of ovarian/tubal salvage. The Coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses delays from symptom-onset to intervention. The primary objective was to evaluate rates of ovarian salvage and tubal salvage following ovarian torsion and adnexal torsion during the COVID-19 pandemic in a pediatric and adolescent gynecology population.

Methods: This was a retrospective quality improvement cohort study of pediatric and adolescent gynecology patients at a single children's hospital who underwent laparoscopy for suspected ovarian torsion/adnexal torsion between March 2020 to March 2021. Descriptive statistics and t-tests were utilized.

Results: There were 50 suspected adnexal cases in 47 patients. All underwent laparoscopy, revealing 39 adnexal torsion occurrences in 36 patients and 1 patient with recurrent adnexal torsion three times. All underwent pre-operative COVID-19 testing. Mean age was 13.9 ± 2.6 years for adnexal torsion cohort. Menarche was achieved in 88% (n = 44) and 12% (n = 6) were pre-menarchal. The primary outcome was ovarian salvage and tubal salvage rates, which were 97.4% (n = 38) and 89.7% (n = 35), respectively. Secondary outcomes assessed factors contributing to the primary outcome or operative delays. The mean age of menarche was 11.2 years (salvaged) and 12.5 years (non-salvaged) (p = 0.04). There were no differences in mean pain duration or mean COVID-19 testing time between groups. Left, right and bilateral adnexal torsion occurred in 42% (n = 21), 32% (n = 16), and 4% (n = 2) respectively. The most common pathologies were paratubal cyst (n = 17, 34%) and benign ovarian cyst (n = 16, 32%).

Conclusions: Ovarian salvage and tubal salvage rates were 97.4% and 89.7%, respectively during the time frame studied. These salvage rates during the study period are comparable to previous rates in a pre-COVID cohort at our institution. Institutional and departmental quality and safety initiatives likely contributed to this outcome.

Background: Parastomal evisceration represents a preventable surgical complication that should not occur with appropriate technical diligence and surgical skills. While late parastomal hernias are well described in the literature, there is a paucity of reports on the early postoperative occurrence of parastomal intestinal evisceration.

Case presentation: An urgent laparotomy was performed on a 58-year-old female patient for an acute cecal perforation with generalized peritonitis related to underlying colon cancer. Intraoperative revelations necessitated a carcinologic right colectomy and the creation of an end-loop ileocolostomy. Following six sessions of adjuvant chemotherapy, Computed tomography scans raised uncertainties about the presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Consequently, a collaborative decision was reached in a multidisciplinary discussion to conduct a surgical biopsy of these deposits before reinstating digestive continuity. The surgical procedure started with stoma mobilization. However, adhesions and a relatively confined aperture curtailed a comprehensive peritoneal cavity exploration. Thus, a midline incision was executed. The verdict from the frozen section examination affirmed metastatic presence, prompting the retention of the stoma. Within 48 h post-surgery, an early-stage parastomal evisceration occurred, stemming from an inadequately sealed aponeurotic sheath. The exposed bowel surface was encased in fibrin, necessitating meticulous irrigation with a warm saline solution before repositioning it within the peritoneal cavity. Accurate adjustment of the aponeurosis closure ensued, coupled with a meticulous reconstitution of the stoma. The postoperative course was uneventful. The patient was subsequently referred for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Conclusions: Preventing parastomal evisceration requires adherence to established stoma-creation protocols, including creating a properly sized fascial opening and secure fixation. In instances of excessive fascial opening, ensuring a tension-free and meticulous closure is imperative.

Background: Systematic analysis of compensation claims following patient injuries is helpful in improving patient safety. The objective of the current study was to assess compensation claims after arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff ruptures, impingement, and acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis reported to the Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation and evaluate if there was regional variation on the risk of patient injuries leading to an accepted compensation claim.

Methods: Data from the Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation and the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR) from 2008 to 2018 were collected. Demographics (age and sex) and type of claim and reasons for accepted claims were obtained from the Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation, while the number of arthroscopic procedures was collected from NPR. The treating institutions were grouped on geography according to Norway's four regional Health Trusts and private institutions and the effect of geography on the probability of an accepted claim was estimated.

Results: NPR registered 69,097 shoulder arthroscopies during the study period, of which 216 (0.3%) compensation claims were filed for patient injury. A total of 38% of the claims were accepted, representing 0.1% of the arthroscopic procedures. Infection (37.8%) was the most common reason for accepted claim, followed by no surgical indication (15.9%) and wrong surgical technique (12.2%). We found a statistically significantly increased odds ratio for a claim being accepted in both the smallest and largest regional Health Trusts compared to the other regional Health Trusts and private institutions.

Conclusions: Compensation claims due to patient injury following shoulder arthroscopy are rare (0.3% of patients file a claim, of which a third is accepted (0.1% of all shoulder arthroscopy patients)). The most common reason for accepted claim was infection followed by lack of indication.

Introduction: Canceling scheduled surgeries on the day of surgery places a heavy burden on healthcare providers and has psychological, social, and financial consequences on patients and their families. This study aimed to investigate the main reasons for cancellations of elective procedures and provide appropriate recommendations to reduce the rate of such avoidable cancellations.

Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from all consecutive elective cases scheduled for various elective surgeries from January 1, 2020 to March 31, 2022 at Namazi Teaching Hospital, a major referral center in southern Iran with a capacity of 938 beds. Daily data were collected on the number of planned electives, cancellations, and reasons for cancellations. Surgical cancellation reasons were categorized as patient-related, surgeon-related, hospital/system-related, and anesthesia-related. Data were expressed as frequency (percentage) and analyzed with SPSS version 19 software.

Results: The cancellation rate on surgery day for elective procedures in all fields was 6.3%. The highest cancellation rate was related to minor surgeries (19%), followed by urology (8%), pediatrics (7%), and plastic surgery (7%). The most common reasons for cancellation were patients not suitable for the procedure (37%), followed by patients who did not follow instructions (10%), lack of time (10.5%), and equipment/supplies problems (10%), and refusal to consent (6%).

Conclusions: According to this study, patients' unsuitability for surgery, non-compliance with instructions, lack of time, and problems with equipment/supplies are the main reasons for canceling surgery. Proper preoperative assessment and preparation of patients and improved communication between medical teams and patients reduce the cancellation of booked surgeries.