Pub Date : 2025-11-21eCollection Date: 2025-11-01DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00154
Marco T Di Stefano, Michael Young, Michaela Corvi, Domenico Franco, Sebastian Schmidt, Chilan B G Leite, Zylyftar Gorica, Ian Hutchinson
» Midsubstance patellar tendon repairs are rare, technically demanding surgeries that are distinct from proximal and distal avulsions due to the challenges of tendon-to-tendon healing and zone of injury tissue quality.» Primary repair using the Krackow suturing technique remains the most widely used method, often combined with patellar and tibial-based fixation.» Protective constructs such as high-strength suture configurations or cerclage wire are employed to share load with the repair site and support healing and function.» Structural and biological augmentations, including autografts, allografts, synthetic ligaments, and collagen scaffolds, are increasingly used to reinforce the injured extensor mechanism, support repair, and enhance healing, particularly in high-risk or complex patients.» Postoperative rehabilitation protocols vary but generally include a period of immobilization in extension followed by progressive flexion, isometric quadriceps activation, and return to normal activity at 9 to 12 months and return to a preinjury level at 12 to 18 months.
{"title":"Management of Acute Midsubstance Patella Tendon Rupture: Current Concepts and Clinical Narrative Review.","authors":"Marco T Di Stefano, Michael Young, Michaela Corvi, Domenico Franco, Sebastian Schmidt, Chilan B G Leite, Zylyftar Gorica, Ian Hutchinson","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00154","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00154","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>» Midsubstance patellar tendon repairs are rare, technically demanding surgeries that are distinct from proximal and distal avulsions due to the challenges of tendon-to-tendon healing and zone of injury tissue quality.» Primary repair using the Krackow suturing technique remains the most widely used method, often combined with patellar and tibial-based fixation.» Protective constructs such as high-strength suture configurations or cerclage wire are employed to share load with the repair site and support healing and function.» Structural and biological augmentations, including autografts, allografts, synthetic ligaments, and collagen scaffolds, are increasingly used to reinforce the injured extensor mechanism, support repair, and enhance healing, particularly in high-risk or complex patients.» Postoperative rehabilitation protocols vary but generally include a period of immobilization in extension followed by progressive flexion, isometric quadriceps activation, and return to normal activity at 9 to 12 months and return to a preinjury level at 12 to 18 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":47098,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Reviews","volume":"13 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146150960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-14eCollection Date: 2025-11-01DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00128
J Terrence Jose Jerome, G Surendran, Thirumagal Kuppusamy
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most patients recover well following fingertip injuries. Outcomes vary along a spectrum, influenced by both pathophysiological severity and psychosocial factors, which strongly influence patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). General instruments (e.g., Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [DASH]; Michigan Hand Questionnaire [MHQ]; and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS]) are reliable but often overlook fingertip-specific concerns such as nail deformity, cold intolerance, pulp loss, or subtle sensory changes. To address this gap, the Fingertip Injuries Outcome Score (FIOS) was developed, integrating objective domains (grip strength, range of motion, 2-point discrimination [2PD], and bone union) with patient-reported domains (nail esthetics, sensibility, cold intolerance, pain, and return to work), providing a fingertip-specific assessment. This study systematically reviews outcome scoring systems for fingertip injuries, evaluating their validity, reliability, responsiveness, and clinical utility, with a particular focus on the FIOS-the only instrument specifically designed for fingertip injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science; up to December 2024) identified studies evaluating fingertip injuries with defined outcome scores. Data included score domains, psychometrics, and applicability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FIOS was the only fingertip-specific score identified, demonstrating strong internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.796) and excellent interrater reliability (κ = 0.844) in its validation study (n = 199), with 93% of patients achieving excellent or good outcomes. An independent pilot (n = 58) confirmed its sensitivity to injury severity. Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference in FIOS outcome distribution across injury mechanisms, though whether this reflects robustness or limited discrimination requires study. General PROMs (MHQ, DASH, Hand20, and PROMIS) each had high internal consistency (α ≥ 0.90) and correlated strongly with psychosocial factors but lacked fingertip-specific coverage. The Hand Injury Severity Score correlated with MHQ but served only as a severity index. By integrating objective and patient-reported domains, FIOS is the most fingertip-specific assessment available.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FIOS is the most complete fingertip-specific outcome instrument and should be adopted as the primary standard for outcome reporting and long-term follow-up across fingertip injuries. For comprehensive assessment, pair FIOS with a general hand/upper-extremity PROM and objective tests (e.g., 2PD, ROM/TAM, and grip strength). Standardizing on FIOS in practice, registries, and trials will harmonize reporting for current and future cohorts and enable clearer comparisons across treatments. While further multicenter validation and responsiveness/minimal clinically important difference estimat
背景:大多数患者指尖损伤后恢复良好。结果在一个范围内变化,受病理生理严重程度和社会心理因素的影响,这些因素强烈影响患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)。一般仪器(如手臂、肩膀和手的残疾[DASH]、密歇根手部问卷[MHQ]和患者报告的结果测量信息系统[PROMIS])是可靠的,但往往忽略了指尖特定的问题,如指甲畸形、寒冷不耐受、牙髓丢失或微妙的感觉变化。为了解决这一差距,开发了指尖损伤结果评分(FIOS),将客观领域(握力,运动范围,2点辨别[2PD]和骨愈合)与患者报告的领域(指甲美学,敏感性,寒冷耐受,疼痛和恢复工作)结合起来,提供指尖特异性评估。本研究系统地回顾了指尖损伤的结果评分系统,评估了其有效性、可靠性、反应性和临床实用性,并特别关注fios——唯一专门为指尖损伤设计的仪器。方法:系统检索(PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science;截止2024年12月)确定了评估指尖损伤的研究,并定义了结果评分。数据包括得分域、心理测量和适用性。结果:FIOS是唯一确定的指尖特异性评分,在其验证研究(n = 199)中表现出较强的内部一致性(Cronbach α = 0.796)和良好的间信度(κ = 0.844), 93%的患者获得优或良结局。一名独立飞行员(n = 58)证实了其对损伤严重程度的敏感性。亚组分析显示,不同损伤机制的FIOS结果分布无显著差异,但这是否反映了稳健性或有限的歧视还有待研究。一般PROMs (MHQ、DASH、Hand20和PROMIS)均具有较高的内部一致性(α≥0.90),且与心理社会因素密切相关,但缺乏指尖特异性覆盖。手部损伤严重程度评分与MHQ相关,但仅作为严重程度指标。通过整合客观和患者报告的领域,FIOS是最具指尖特异性的评估。结论:FIOS是最完整的指尖特异性预后指标,应作为指尖损伤预后报告和长期随访的主要标准。为了进行综合评估,将FIOS与一般手/上肢PROM和客观测试(例如2PD, ROM/TAM和握力)配对。在实践、注册和试验中标准化FIOS将协调当前和未来队列的报告,并使不同治疗之间的比较更加清晰。虽然进一步的多中心验证和反应性/最小临床重要差异评估仍然是优先考虑的事项,但对指尖特异性标准的需求证明了现在采用FIOS的理由。证据等级:治疗性III级。没有随机对照试验的队列和观察性研究的系统评价。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
{"title":"Outcome Scores for Fingertip Injuries: A Systematic Review.","authors":"J Terrence Jose Jerome, G Surendran, Thirumagal Kuppusamy","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00128","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00128","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most patients recover well following fingertip injuries. Outcomes vary along a spectrum, influenced by both pathophysiological severity and psychosocial factors, which strongly influence patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). General instruments (e.g., Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [DASH]; Michigan Hand Questionnaire [MHQ]; and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS]) are reliable but often overlook fingertip-specific concerns such as nail deformity, cold intolerance, pulp loss, or subtle sensory changes. To address this gap, the Fingertip Injuries Outcome Score (FIOS) was developed, integrating objective domains (grip strength, range of motion, 2-point discrimination [2PD], and bone union) with patient-reported domains (nail esthetics, sensibility, cold intolerance, pain, and return to work), providing a fingertip-specific assessment. This study systematically reviews outcome scoring systems for fingertip injuries, evaluating their validity, reliability, responsiveness, and clinical utility, with a particular focus on the FIOS-the only instrument specifically designed for fingertip injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science; up to December 2024) identified studies evaluating fingertip injuries with defined outcome scores. Data included score domains, psychometrics, and applicability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FIOS was the only fingertip-specific score identified, demonstrating strong internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.796) and excellent interrater reliability (κ = 0.844) in its validation study (n = 199), with 93% of patients achieving excellent or good outcomes. An independent pilot (n = 58) confirmed its sensitivity to injury severity. Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference in FIOS outcome distribution across injury mechanisms, though whether this reflects robustness or limited discrimination requires study. General PROMs (MHQ, DASH, Hand20, and PROMIS) each had high internal consistency (α ≥ 0.90) and correlated strongly with psychosocial factors but lacked fingertip-specific coverage. The Hand Injury Severity Score correlated with MHQ but served only as a severity index. By integrating objective and patient-reported domains, FIOS is the most fingertip-specific assessment available.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FIOS is the most complete fingertip-specific outcome instrument and should be adopted as the primary standard for outcome reporting and long-term follow-up across fingertip injuries. For comprehensive assessment, pair FIOS with a general hand/upper-extremity PROM and objective tests (e.g., 2PD, ROM/TAM, and grip strength). Standardizing on FIOS in practice, registries, and trials will harmonize reporting for current and future cohorts and enable clearer comparisons across treatments. While further multicenter validation and responsiveness/minimal clinically important difference estimat","PeriodicalId":47098,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Reviews","volume":"13 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145524189","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-14eCollection Date: 2025-11-01DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00131
Ali Salmani, Yashar Khani, Ramila Abedi-Azar, Seyedmehrad Namazi, Mahin Akhoundpoor, Yazdan Hasanvand, Amir Mehrvar
Background: Sleep disturbances are common after total joint arthroplasty and can impair recovery, increase complications, and reduce patient satisfaction. Nonpharmacological interventions (NPIs) may offer safer alternatives to medications, but their effectiveness in improving postoperative sleep remains unclear. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the impact of NPIs on sleep outcomes following hip or knee arthroplasty.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review in November 2024 across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase for studies investigating NPIs related to sleep outcomes after hip or knee arthroplasty. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently using the National Institutes of Health tools. A meta-analysis was conducted on studies reporting Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores, and the mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed by the Cochran Q statistic and the I2 test.
Results: Ten studies (n = 1,545; mean age 65.69 years, 54.43% female) were included. NPIs were categorized into nursing-based interventions, environmental controls, relaxation techniques, neuromodulation, and movement restriction. The pooled analysis of 6 studies (n = 760) showed that NPIs significantly improved sleep quality compared with controls (MD = -2.61; 95% CI -3.27 to -1.95; p < 0.00001; I2 = 86%). Subgroup analysis revealed the greatest benefit from nursing-based interventions (MD = -3.06; 95% CI -3.39 to -2.73; I2 = 30%), while environmental interventions showed a smaller but significant effect (MD = -1.58; 95% CI -2.75 to -0.40; I2 = 79%). Functional, psychological, and quality-of-life outcomes showed variable results across studies.
Conclusion: NPIs, particularly nursing-based interventions and environmental controls, appear effective in improving postoperative sleep after joint arthroplasty. However, heterogeneity and limited high-quality evidence warrant further randomized trials with standardized protocols and objective sleep measures.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
{"title":"Nonpharmacological Interventions Improve Postoperative Sleep in Arthroplasty Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Ali Salmani, Yashar Khani, Ramila Abedi-Azar, Seyedmehrad Namazi, Mahin Akhoundpoor, Yazdan Hasanvand, Amir Mehrvar","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00131","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00131","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sleep disturbances are common after total joint arthroplasty and can impair recovery, increase complications, and reduce patient satisfaction. Nonpharmacological interventions (NPIs) may offer safer alternatives to medications, but their effectiveness in improving postoperative sleep remains unclear. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the impact of NPIs on sleep outcomes following hip or knee arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review in November 2024 across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase for studies investigating NPIs related to sleep outcomes after hip or knee arthroplasty. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently using the National Institutes of Health tools. A meta-analysis was conducted on studies reporting Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores, and the mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed by the Cochran Q statistic and the I2 test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies (n = 1,545; mean age 65.69 years, 54.43% female) were included. NPIs were categorized into nursing-based interventions, environmental controls, relaxation techniques, neuromodulation, and movement restriction. The pooled analysis of 6 studies (n = 760) showed that NPIs significantly improved sleep quality compared with controls (MD = -2.61; 95% CI -3.27 to -1.95; p < 0.00001; I2 = 86%). Subgroup analysis revealed the greatest benefit from nursing-based interventions (MD = -3.06; 95% CI -3.39 to -2.73; I2 = 30%), while environmental interventions showed a smaller but significant effect (MD = -1.58; 95% CI -2.75 to -0.40; I2 = 79%). Functional, psychological, and quality-of-life outcomes showed variable results across studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NPIs, particularly nursing-based interventions and environmental controls, appear effective in improving postoperative sleep after joint arthroplasty. However, heterogeneity and limited high-quality evidence warrant further randomized trials with standardized protocols and objective sleep measures.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":47098,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Reviews","volume":"13 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145523892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-14eCollection Date: 2025-11-01DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00088
Jean Shanaa, Theodor Di Pauli von Treuheim, Anzar Sarfraz, Ran Schwarzkopf, Vinay K Aggarwal, Morteza Meftah
Background: Historically, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) used resection and balancing techniques to target symmetric medial and lateral gaps throughout range of motion (ROM). With modern awareness on alternate alignment concepts, one area of ongoing debate is whether asymmetric medial and lateral compartment gaps improve outcomes. Proponents of an asymmetric looser lateral compartment gap philosophy postulate that this phenotype recreates native knee kinematics with lateral femoral condylar rollback pivoting through a tighter medial compartment during knee flexion. The purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and ROM with respect to symmetric or asymmetric gaps.
Methods: We performed a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective studies. We compiled all comparative studies reporting symmetric and asymmetric gaps, irrespective of directional or nondirectional gap asymmetry. However, we performed a meta-analysis only between a cohort of directional asymmetric gaps (looser lateral than medial gap) and symmetric gaps (equal medial and lateral gaps). Gaps were compared in flexion and extension. ROM and PROs were evaluated through standardized mean difference (SMD), with statistical significance defined by 95% confidence interval (CI).
Results: A total of 17 studies with 3,319 knees were included. Four studies reported nondirectional gap asymmetry, whereas 13 studies reported directional gap asymmetry, of which 8 shared common outcome variables and were therefore included in the meta-analysis. Analysis of gaps in flexion revealed significantly increased ROM favoring asymmetric looser lateral gaps over symmetric gaps (SMD -0.19, 95% CI -0.29 to -0.09). Analysis of gaps in extension also revealed increased ROM favoring asymmetric looser lateral gaps (SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.16). Finally, the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) favored looser lateral gaps in flexion over symmetric gaps (SMD -0.13, 95% CI -0.41 to 0.15). However, differences in the latter 2 were nonsignificant.
Conclusion: This is the first meta-analysis evaluating the postoperative outcomes as a function of symmetric vs. asymmetric mediolateral gaps. We report improved FJS and ROM favoring asymmetric looser lateral gaps in flexion.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level II, systematic review of Level II and III and IV studies. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
背景:历史上,全膝关节置换术(TKA)使用切除和平衡技术来靶向整个活动范围(ROM)的对称内侧和外侧间隙。随着现代对替代对齐概念的认识,一个持续争论的领域是不对称的内侧和外侧隔室间隙是否能改善结果。不对称外侧腔室间隙疏松的支持者认为,这种表型在膝关节屈曲期间通过更紧的内侧腔室再现了股骨外侧髁回滚旋转的固有膝关节运动学。本研究的目的是比较患者报告的结果(PROs)和ROM对对称或非对称间隙的影响。方法:我们对前瞻性和回顾性研究进行了系统回顾和随机效应荟萃分析。我们汇编了所有关于对称和不对称间隙的比较研究,无论定向或非定向间隙不对称。然而,我们仅在定向非对称间隙(外侧间隙比内侧间隙更疏松)和对称间隙(内侧和外侧间隙相等)的队列之间进行了荟萃分析。比较屈伸间隙。ROM和PROs通过标准化平均差(SMD)进行评估,95%置信区间(CI)定义统计学显著性。结果:共纳入17项研究,涉及3319个膝关节。4项研究报告了非方向性差距不对称,而13项研究报告了方向性差距不对称,其中8项具有共同的结果变量,因此被纳入meta分析。对屈曲间隙的分析显示,与对称间隙相比,不对称侧间隙的ROM明显增加,更倾向于疏松的侧间隙(SMD -0.19, 95% CI -0.29至-0.09)。对延伸间隙的分析也显示,ROM增加有利于不对称的松散侧间隙(SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.36至0.16)。最后,与对称间隙相比,遗忘关节评分(FJS)更倾向于屈曲时更宽松的侧向间隙(SMD -0.13, 95% CI -0.41至0.15)。然而,后两者的差异不显著。结论:这是第一个评价对称与非对称中外侧间隙的术后结果的荟萃分析。我们报告改进的FJS和ROM有利于不对称的松散的侧向屈曲间隙。证据水平:治疗性II级,II级、III级和IV级研究的系统评价。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
{"title":"Symmetric vs. Asymmetric Mediolateral Gaps in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Jean Shanaa, Theodor Di Pauli von Treuheim, Anzar Sarfraz, Ran Schwarzkopf, Vinay K Aggarwal, Morteza Meftah","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00088","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00088","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Historically, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) used resection and balancing techniques to target symmetric medial and lateral gaps throughout range of motion (ROM). With modern awareness on alternate alignment concepts, one area of ongoing debate is whether asymmetric medial and lateral compartment gaps improve outcomes. Proponents of an asymmetric looser lateral compartment gap philosophy postulate that this phenotype recreates native knee kinematics with lateral femoral condylar rollback pivoting through a tighter medial compartment during knee flexion. The purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and ROM with respect to symmetric or asymmetric gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective studies. We compiled all comparative studies reporting symmetric and asymmetric gaps, irrespective of directional or nondirectional gap asymmetry. However, we performed a meta-analysis only between a cohort of directional asymmetric gaps (looser lateral than medial gap) and symmetric gaps (equal medial and lateral gaps). Gaps were compared in flexion and extension. ROM and PROs were evaluated through standardized mean difference (SMD), with statistical significance defined by 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 studies with 3,319 knees were included. Four studies reported nondirectional gap asymmetry, whereas 13 studies reported directional gap asymmetry, of which 8 shared common outcome variables and were therefore included in the meta-analysis. Analysis of gaps in flexion revealed significantly increased ROM favoring asymmetric looser lateral gaps over symmetric gaps (SMD -0.19, 95% CI -0.29 to -0.09). Analysis of gaps in extension also revealed increased ROM favoring asymmetric looser lateral gaps (SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.16). Finally, the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) favored looser lateral gaps in flexion over symmetric gaps (SMD -0.13, 95% CI -0.41 to 0.15). However, differences in the latter 2 were nonsignificant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first meta-analysis evaluating the postoperative outcomes as a function of symmetric vs. asymmetric mediolateral gaps. We report improved FJS and ROM favoring asymmetric looser lateral gaps in flexion.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level II, systematic review of Level II and III and IV studies. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":47098,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Reviews","volume":"13 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146150936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-27eCollection Date: 2025-10-01DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00048
Chris G Sanford, Thomas Cho, Ki Woong Yoon, Pranav Gadangi, Jiayong Liu
» Inconsistent terminology and overlapping definitions for posterior distal tibia/ankle fractures (posterior malleolar, pilon-variant, posterior pilon) hinder standardized care and outcomes. This study critically evaluates classifications and treatments, proposing clear definitions based on fragment morphology, articular involvement, and biomechanics:» 1. Posterior malleolar fractures: Involve the non-weight-bearing posterior tibial margin, typically from rotational injuries. Nonoperative management suffices if the syndesmosis is stable (smaller fragments). In the case of an unstable syndesmosis, surgical fixation by a posterolateral (PL) approach is recommended for direct visualization, reduction, and stable fixation, although this may vary case by case.» 2. Posterior pilon-variant fractures: Intermediate severity, affecting the posteromedial (PM) tibia and partially compromising the weight-bearing surface. Characterized by large PM fragments. Fixation by a PM approach is recommended, promoting faster union and reducing neurovascular risk compared with PL, although this is ultimately up to the surgeon's preference.» 3. Posterior pilon fractures: Involve disruption of the weight-bearing articular surface with posterior plafond extension, resulting from high-energy axial compression (e.g., falls). Features include comminution, articular impaction, and potential involvement of posterior/medial columns, resembling classic pilon but posteriorly localized. Severe soft-tissue damage necessitates staged management: initial external fixation followed by definitive internal fixation. Addressing comminuted fragments requires a combined PL and PM approach. For a large fragment with no comminution, minimally invasive anterior cannulated screws can be used.» This taxonomy directly links fracture patterns to surgical urgency (nonoperative, single-stage, staged), fixation strategies (approach selection-PL, PM, or combined), and prognostic implications. By integrating anatomical precision with clinical practicality, the framework resolves current terminology disparities, enhances diagnostic reproducibility, and aims to improve outcomes for these complex injuries.
{"title":"Distinguishing Fractures in Posterior Distal Tibia and Ankle: A Review of Posterior Malleolar, Pilon, and Pilon-Variant Definitions and Treatments.","authors":"Chris G Sanford, Thomas Cho, Ki Woong Yoon, Pranav Gadangi, Jiayong Liu","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00048","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00048","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>» Inconsistent terminology and overlapping definitions for posterior distal tibia/ankle fractures (posterior malleolar, pilon-variant, posterior pilon) hinder standardized care and outcomes. This study critically evaluates classifications and treatments, proposing clear definitions based on fragment morphology, articular involvement, and biomechanics:» 1. Posterior malleolar fractures: Involve the non-weight-bearing posterior tibial margin, typically from rotational injuries. Nonoperative management suffices if the syndesmosis is stable (smaller fragments). In the case of an unstable syndesmosis, surgical fixation by a posterolateral (PL) approach is recommended for direct visualization, reduction, and stable fixation, although this may vary case by case.» 2. Posterior pilon-variant fractures: Intermediate severity, affecting the posteromedial (PM) tibia and partially compromising the weight-bearing surface. Characterized by large PM fragments. Fixation by a PM approach is recommended, promoting faster union and reducing neurovascular risk compared with PL, although this is ultimately up to the surgeon's preference.» 3. Posterior pilon fractures: Involve disruption of the weight-bearing articular surface with posterior plafond extension, resulting from high-energy axial compression (e.g., falls). Features include comminution, articular impaction, and potential involvement of posterior/medial columns, resembling classic pilon but posteriorly localized. Severe soft-tissue damage necessitates staged management: initial external fixation followed by definitive internal fixation. Addressing comminuted fragments requires a combined PL and PM approach. For a large fragment with no comminution, minimally invasive anterior cannulated screws can be used.» This taxonomy directly links fracture patterns to surgical urgency (nonoperative, single-stage, staged), fixation strategies (approach selection-PL, PM, or combined), and prognostic implications. By integrating anatomical precision with clinical practicality, the framework resolves current terminology disparities, enhances diagnostic reproducibility, and aims to improve outcomes for these complex injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":47098,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Reviews","volume":"13 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145423116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-24eCollection Date: 2025-10-01DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00164
Mitchell J Christiansen, Mary K Mulcahey
» Career transitions in orthopaedic surgery present meaningful opportunities for professional growth and personal fulfillment. Orthopaedic surgeons frequently navigate career shifts due to factors such as new professional or leadership opportunities, burnout, or workplace dissatisfaction. Notably, more than 50% of orthopaedic surgeons change jobs within their first 5 years of practice, underscoring the significance of strategic planning and thoughtful decision-making in these transitions.» To facilitate effective career changes, structured frameworks can guide surgeons through self-assessment, identification of strengths and interests, strategic delegation, and streamlining responsibilities.» Critical considerations before transition include recognizing the limitations of the current job situation, clarifying future career goals, and engaging trusted colleagues and mentors. Early and proactive communication, deliberate preparation, and iterative evaluation are essential practices that enhance the effectiveness of career transitions.» The purpose of this review was to explore when orthopaedic surgeons should contemplate career transitions, outline essential factors and critical questions for reflection, and propose structured strategies to support sustainable and successful career evolution.
{"title":"Strategic Career Transitions in Orthopaedic Surgery.","authors":"Mitchell J Christiansen, Mary K Mulcahey","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00164","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00164","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>» Career transitions in orthopaedic surgery present meaningful opportunities for professional growth and personal fulfillment. Orthopaedic surgeons frequently navigate career shifts due to factors such as new professional or leadership opportunities, burnout, or workplace dissatisfaction. Notably, more than 50% of orthopaedic surgeons change jobs within their first 5 years of practice, underscoring the significance of strategic planning and thoughtful decision-making in these transitions.» To facilitate effective career changes, structured frameworks can guide surgeons through self-assessment, identification of strengths and interests, strategic delegation, and streamlining responsibilities.» Critical considerations before transition include recognizing the limitations of the current job situation, clarifying future career goals, and engaging trusted colleagues and mentors. Early and proactive communication, deliberate preparation, and iterative evaluation are essential practices that enhance the effectiveness of career transitions.» The purpose of this review was to explore when orthopaedic surgeons should contemplate career transitions, outline essential factors and critical questions for reflection, and propose structured strategies to support sustainable and successful career evolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":47098,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Reviews","volume":"13 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145369014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-24eCollection Date: 2025-10-01DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00134
Songci Wang, Pu Zhang, Jianhao Xie, Chunyan Jiang
Background: Rotator cuff repair is a common and effective method for treating rotator cuff tears (RCTs). At the same time, postoperative shoulder stiffness (PSS) remains a common adverse complication that may seriously affect patients' postoperative recovery and quality of life. Existing studies have reported inconsistent results on risk factors of PSS, and a systematic quantitative analysis is required. This study aims to identify the risk factors for PSS after RCT through a systematic review and meta-analysis and provide an evidence-based basis for clinical practice.
Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases from their establishment date to November 2024. Cohort and case-control studies that met the criteria were included. Relevant risk factors and their effect sizes were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata/SE 17.0, and fixed-effect or random-effect models were selected and applied according to the level of heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias assessment were also performed.
Results: Eighteen studies involving 63,565 patients were included, and 20 potential risk factors were analyzed. Among them, age (mean difference 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.03-0.43, p = 0.027), female (odds ratio [OR] 1.99, 95% CI 1.69-2.32, p < 0.001), diabetes (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.15-3.52, p = 0.015), thyroid disease (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.09-1.59, p = 0.004), and workers' compensation insurance (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.10-3.37, p = 0.022) were associated with PSS. Subgroup analyses indicated that female in non-Asian populations (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.66-2.84, p < 0.001) and preoperative shoulder stiffness in patients with a follow-up of more than 3 months (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.03-2.60, p = 0.035) were significantly associated with PSS.
Conclusion: PSS after RCT is affected by multiple factors. According to current evidence, advanced age, female, diabetes, thyroid disease, and workers' compensation insurance are high-risk factors. Clinical attention should be paid to comprehensive preoperative evaluation and individualized management strategies, especially to strengthen intervention during the perioperative period in high-risk groups.
Level of evidence: Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
背景:肩袖修复是治疗肩袖撕裂(rct)的一种常见且有效的方法。同时,术后肩僵硬(PSS)仍是常见的不良并发症,严重影响患者术后恢复和生活质量。现有研究对PSS危险因素的研究结果不一致,需要进行系统的定量分析。本研究旨在通过系统综述和荟萃分析,明确RCT后PSS的危险因素,为临床实践提供循证依据。方法:检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane和Web of Science数据库,检索时间从数据库建立之日至2024年11月。纳入了符合标准的队列研究和病例对照研究。提取相关危险因素及其效应量。采用Stata/SE 17.0进行meta分析,根据异质性水平选择固定效应或随机效应模型。进行亚组分析、敏感性分析和发表偏倚评价。结果:纳入18项研究,涉及63565例患者,分析了20个潜在危险因素。其中,年龄(平均差值0.23,95%可信区间[CI] 0.03 ~ 0.43, p = 0.027)、女性(比值比[OR] 1.99, 95% CI 1.69 ~ 2.32, p < 0.001)、糖尿病(OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.15 ~ 3.52, p = 0.015)、甲状腺疾病(OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.09 ~ 1.59, p = 0.004)、工伤保险(OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.10 ~ 3.37, p = 0.022)与PSS相关。亚组分析显示,非亚洲人群中的女性(OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.66-2.84, p < 0.001)和随访超过3个月的患者术前肩僵硬度(OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.03-2.60, p = 0.035)与PSS显著相关。结论:RCT术后PSS受多种因素影响。根据目前的证据,高龄、女性、糖尿病、甲状腺疾病和工伤保险是高危因素。临床应注意术前综合评估和个体化管理策略,特别是高危人群围手术期应加强干预。证据等级:v级。参见《作者说明》获得证据等级的完整描述。
{"title":"Risk Factors of Postoperative Shoulder Stiffness After Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Songci Wang, Pu Zhang, Jianhao Xie, Chunyan Jiang","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00134","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00134","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rotator cuff repair is a common and effective method for treating rotator cuff tears (RCTs). At the same time, postoperative shoulder stiffness (PSS) remains a common adverse complication that may seriously affect patients' postoperative recovery and quality of life. Existing studies have reported inconsistent results on risk factors of PSS, and a systematic quantitative analysis is required. This study aims to identify the risk factors for PSS after RCT through a systematic review and meta-analysis and provide an evidence-based basis for clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases from their establishment date to November 2024. Cohort and case-control studies that met the criteria were included. Relevant risk factors and their effect sizes were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata/SE 17.0, and fixed-effect or random-effect models were selected and applied according to the level of heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias assessment were also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen studies involving 63,565 patients were included, and 20 potential risk factors were analyzed. Among them, age (mean difference 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.03-0.43, p = 0.027), female (odds ratio [OR] 1.99, 95% CI 1.69-2.32, p < 0.001), diabetes (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.15-3.52, p = 0.015), thyroid disease (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.09-1.59, p = 0.004), and workers' compensation insurance (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.10-3.37, p = 0.022) were associated with PSS. Subgroup analyses indicated that female in non-Asian populations (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.66-2.84, p < 0.001) and preoperative shoulder stiffness in patients with a follow-up of more than 3 months (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.03-2.60, p = 0.035) were significantly associated with PSS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PSS after RCT is affected by multiple factors. According to current evidence, advanced age, female, diabetes, thyroid disease, and workers' compensation insurance are high-risk factors. Clinical attention should be paid to comprehensive preoperative evaluation and individualized management strategies, especially to strengthen intervention during the perioperative period in high-risk groups.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":47098,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Reviews","volume":"13 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145368980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-07eCollection Date: 2025-10-01DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00111
Omar Abdalla, Jon Novosel, Chloe Tucker, Toufic R Jildeh
» Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has become the standard surgical treatment for rotator cuff arthropathy, offering reliable improvements in function and pain relief. However, postoperative shoulder pain remains a complex and clinically significant challenge.» The differential diagnosis of a painful rTSA includes infectious, mechanical, and neurological or immunological complications. Key etiologies include periprosthetic joint infection (0.5%-6.7% incidence, 13.8% of all complications), instability, aseptic loosening (glenoid loosening 2.3%, humeral loosening 1.4%), polyethylene wear, scapular notching (reported as high as 96%), postoperative fractures, neurologic injury (up to 3.6%), and metal hypersensitivity (prevalence of 10%-15% in the general population).» Diagnostic workup requires a structured approach combining clinical examination, radiographic analysis, serologic markers, advanced imaging, and intraoperative assessment when necessary. Several etiologies, particularly infection, metal allergy, and polyethylene wear, may present with overlapping symptoms, necessitating a systematic evaluation.» Management of the painful rTSA is diagnosis-specific and ranges from nonoperative interventions (physical therapy, benign neglect, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, or bracing) to surgical revision procedures such as debridement, component exchange, fracture fixation, or tendon lengthening.» Understanding the biomechanical principles of rTSA design, implant positioning, and soft tissue balance is critical for both prevention and treatment of postoperative pain. While biomechanical innovations have improved joint stability and the efficiency of surrounding soft tissue, the expanding use of rTSA continues to pose challenges for complication rates and long-term outcomes, necessitating clinical vigilance and individualized patient management strategies.
{"title":"Assessment and Management of the Painful Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.","authors":"Omar Abdalla, Jon Novosel, Chloe Tucker, Toufic R Jildeh","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00111","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>» Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has become the standard surgical treatment for rotator cuff arthropathy, offering reliable improvements in function and pain relief. However, postoperative shoulder pain remains a complex and clinically significant challenge.» The differential diagnosis of a painful rTSA includes infectious, mechanical, and neurological or immunological complications. Key etiologies include periprosthetic joint infection (0.5%-6.7% incidence, 13.8% of all complications), instability, aseptic loosening (glenoid loosening 2.3%, humeral loosening 1.4%), polyethylene wear, scapular notching (reported as high as 96%), postoperative fractures, neurologic injury (up to 3.6%), and metal hypersensitivity (prevalence of 10%-15% in the general population).» Diagnostic workup requires a structured approach combining clinical examination, radiographic analysis, serologic markers, advanced imaging, and intraoperative assessment when necessary. Several etiologies, particularly infection, metal allergy, and polyethylene wear, may present with overlapping symptoms, necessitating a systematic evaluation.» Management of the painful rTSA is diagnosis-specific and ranges from nonoperative interventions (physical therapy, benign neglect, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, or bracing) to surgical revision procedures such as debridement, component exchange, fracture fixation, or tendon lengthening.» Understanding the biomechanical principles of rTSA design, implant positioning, and soft tissue balance is critical for both prevention and treatment of postoperative pain. While biomechanical innovations have improved joint stability and the efficiency of surrounding soft tissue, the expanding use of rTSA continues to pose challenges for complication rates and long-term outcomes, necessitating clinical vigilance and individualized patient management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47098,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Reviews","volume":"13 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145245499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-07eCollection Date: 2025-10-01DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00047
Lindsey G Droz, Alex M Meyer, Matthew J Brown, Hope E Weissler, Chandler A Long, Tina D Tailor, Robert French, Christian A Pean
Background: Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are increasingly prevalent, particularly in the geriatric population, where they represent a significant burden both individually and societally. Vascular injury, though rare, can have profound implications for management and outcomes. The presence of these concomitant injuries has been shown to be associated with an increased length of hospital stay, total cost, and patient mortality underscoring the critical need for accurate identification of both osseous and vascular injuries to provide appropriate, comprehensive care. Despite extensive research, controversy remains regarding the optimal management of these injuries. Nonoperative management is suitable for fractures meeting specific criteria, while operative options vary based on fracture characteristics, patient factors, and surgeon expertise. The rise in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) as a treatment of complex fracture patterns reflects evolving trends in clinical practice.
Clinical scenario: This report presents the case of a 76-year-old woman with a complex, 4-part PHF dislocation sustained secondary to a ground-level fall. On examination, she exhibited diminished radial nerve sensation with wrist extension weakness but was otherwise neurovascularly intact. Cross sectional imaging demonstrated significant medialization of an anterior fracture dislocation of the proximal humerus. Computed tomography angiography of the left upper extremity showed a markedly tortuous axillary artery with possible intimal injury, prompting a multidisciplinary approach.
Treatment approach: A shared decision-making model led to combination surgical case with vascular and orthopaedic surgery for subclavian artery exposure followed by RSA. Postoperatively, the patient recovered without complication, demonstrating the importance of an individualized, multidisciplinary strategy for managing complex PHF with associated vascular insult.
Conclusion: This case highlights the critical role of recognition of potential neurovascular injuries due to traumatic events and coordinated management of osseous and vascular injuries in complex PHF. We also describe a combined surgical approach and interdisciplinary coordination for PHF dislocations with concern for vascular compromise. Glenohumeral fracture dislocations are high-risk injuries where RSA offers predictable outcomes for complex fracture patterns but demands careful consideration in the setting of possible vascular trauma.
{"title":"Team Approach: Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in the Setting of a 4-Part Proximal Humerus Fracture with Vascular Compromise.","authors":"Lindsey G Droz, Alex M Meyer, Matthew J Brown, Hope E Weissler, Chandler A Long, Tina D Tailor, Robert French, Christian A Pean","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00047","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00047","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are increasingly prevalent, particularly in the geriatric population, where they represent a significant burden both individually and societally. Vascular injury, though rare, can have profound implications for management and outcomes. The presence of these concomitant injuries has been shown to be associated with an increased length of hospital stay, total cost, and patient mortality underscoring the critical need for accurate identification of both osseous and vascular injuries to provide appropriate, comprehensive care. Despite extensive research, controversy remains regarding the optimal management of these injuries. Nonoperative management is suitable for fractures meeting specific criteria, while operative options vary based on fracture characteristics, patient factors, and surgeon expertise. The rise in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) as a treatment of complex fracture patterns reflects evolving trends in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Clinical scenario: </strong>This report presents the case of a 76-year-old woman with a complex, 4-part PHF dislocation sustained secondary to a ground-level fall. On examination, she exhibited diminished radial nerve sensation with wrist extension weakness but was otherwise neurovascularly intact. Cross sectional imaging demonstrated significant medialization of an anterior fracture dislocation of the proximal humerus. Computed tomography angiography of the left upper extremity showed a markedly tortuous axillary artery with possible intimal injury, prompting a multidisciplinary approach.</p><p><strong>Treatment approach: </strong>A shared decision-making model led to combination surgical case with vascular and orthopaedic surgery for subclavian artery exposure followed by RSA. Postoperatively, the patient recovered without complication, demonstrating the importance of an individualized, multidisciplinary strategy for managing complex PHF with associated vascular insult.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case highlights the critical role of recognition of potential neurovascular injuries due to traumatic events and coordinated management of osseous and vascular injuries in complex PHF. We also describe a combined surgical approach and interdisciplinary coordination for PHF dislocations with concern for vascular compromise. Glenohumeral fracture dislocations are high-risk injuries where RSA offers predictable outcomes for complex fracture patterns but demands careful consideration in the setting of possible vascular trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":47098,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Reviews","volume":"13 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145245526","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-24eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.ER.25.00108
Sai Viswan Thiagarajah, Joshua Henry, Venkat Sivaprakasam, Paul M Sutton, Charalambos P Charalambous
{"title":"Erratum: Evaluation of Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Its Clinical Impact: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Sai Viswan Thiagarajah, Joshua Henry, Venkat Sivaprakasam, Paul M Sutton, Charalambos P Charalambous","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.RVW.ER.25.00108","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.RVW.ER.25.00108","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47098,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Reviews","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145138906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}