首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Behavioral Education最新文献

英文 中文
The Effects of Tootling Combined with Public Posting in High School Classrooms “吹口哨”与“公开张贴”相结合在高中课堂中的效果
IF 2 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2022-01-07 DOI: 10.1007/s10864-021-09462-1
Sarah W. Harry, D. Tingstrom, Brad A. Dufrene, Evan H. Dart, Keith C. Radley, John D. K. Lum, Kayla E Bates-Brantley
{"title":"The Effects of Tootling Combined with Public Posting in High School Classrooms","authors":"Sarah W. Harry, D. Tingstrom, Brad A. Dufrene, Evan H. Dart, Keith C. Radley, John D. K. Lum, Kayla E Bates-Brantley","doi":"10.1007/s10864-021-09462-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-021-09462-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41530613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
A Systematic Review and Quantitative Analysis of Interteaching. 跨学科教学的系统回顾和定量分析。
IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-27 DOI: 10.1007/s10864-021-09452-3
Camilo Hurtado-Parrado, Nicole Pfaller-Sadovsky, Lucia Medina, Catherine M Gayman, Kristen A Rost, Derek Schofill

Interteaching is a behavioral teaching method that departs from the traditional lecture format (Boyce & Hineline in BA 25:215-226, 2002). We updated and expanded previous interteaching reviews and conducted a meta-analysis on its effectiveness. Systematic searches identified 38 relevant studies spanning the years 2005-2018. The majority of these studies were conducted in undergraduate face-to-face courses. The most common independent variables were manipulations of the configuration of interteaching or comparisons to traditional-lecture format. The most common dependent variables were quiz or examination scores. Only 24% of all studies implemented at least five of the seven components of interteaching. Prep guides, discussions, record sheets, and frequent assessments were the most commonly implemented. Meta-analyses indicated that interteaching is more effective than traditional lecture or other control conditions, with an overall large effect size. Furthermore, variations in the configuration of the interteaching components do not seem to substantially limit its effectiveness, as long as the discussion component is included. Future research informed by the present review includes: (a) investigating the efficacy of interteaching in additional academic areas, online environments, workplace training, and continuing education, (b) testing alternative outcome measures, generalization, and procedural integrity, (c) conducting systematic component analyses, and (d) measuring social validity from the instructor's perspective.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10864-021-09452-3.

交互式教学是一种不同于传统讲授形式的行为教学方法(Boyce & Hineline in BA 25:215-226, 2002)。我们更新和扩充了之前的跨教学法综述,并对其有效性进行了荟萃分析。通过系统检索,我们发现了 2005-2018 年间的 38 项相关研究。这些研究大多是在本科生面授课程中进行的。最常见的自变量是对交互式教学配置的操作或与传统授课形式的比较。最常见的因变量是测验或考试成绩。在所有研究中,只有 24% 的研究实施了至少五项跨学科教学的七项内容。预习指导、讨论、记录表和频繁评估是最常见的实施方式。元分析表明,跨学科教学比传统的讲授或其他控制条件更有效,总体效果规模较大。此外,只要包含讨论部分,教学间组成部分的配置变化似乎并不会在很大程度上限制其有效性。根据本综述,今后的研究包括(a) 调查在其他学术领域、在线环境、工作场所培训和继续教育中的交互式教学效果,(b) 测试替代性结果测量、普遍性和程序完整性,(c) 进行系统性成分分析,(d) 从教师的角度测量社会有效性:在线版本包含补充材料,可查阅 10.1007/s10864-021-09452-3。
{"title":"A Systematic Review and Quantitative Analysis of Interteaching.","authors":"Camilo Hurtado-Parrado, Nicole Pfaller-Sadovsky, Lucia Medina, Catherine M Gayman, Kristen A Rost, Derek Schofill","doi":"10.1007/s10864-021-09452-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10864-021-09452-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Interteaching</i> is a behavioral teaching method that departs from the traditional lecture format (Boyce & Hineline in BA 25:215-226, 2002). We updated and expanded previous interteaching reviews and conducted a meta-analysis on its effectiveness. Systematic searches identified 38 relevant studies spanning the years 2005-2018. The majority of these studies were conducted in undergraduate face-to-face courses. The most common independent variables were manipulations of the configuration of interteaching or comparisons to traditional-lecture format. The most common dependent variables were quiz or examination scores. Only 24% of all studies implemented at least five of the seven components of interteaching. Prep guides, discussions, record sheets, and frequent assessments were the most commonly implemented. Meta-analyses indicated that interteaching is more effective than traditional lecture or other control conditions, with an overall large effect size. Furthermore, variations in the configuration of the interteaching components do not seem to substantially limit its effectiveness, as long as the discussion component is included. Future research informed by the present review includes: (a) investigating the efficacy of interteaching in additional academic areas, online environments, workplace training, and continuing education, (b) testing alternative outcome measures, generalization, and procedural integrity, (c) conducting systematic component analyses, and (d) measuring social validity from the instructor's perspective.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10864-021-09452-3.</p>","PeriodicalId":47391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Education","volume":"31 1","pages":"157-185"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8475850/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39481039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Effect of Synchronous Discussion Sessions in an Asynchronous Course. 同步讨论在非同步课程中的效果。
IF 2 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-06 DOI: 10.1007/s10864-020-09421-2
Jesslyn N Farros, Lesley A Shawler, Ksenia S Gatzunis, Mary Jane Weiss

Online learning is extremely prevalent in education, more than ever given the COVID-19 pandemic that has shifted most educational services to an online platform. More specifically, in 2015, close to six million students were taking at least one online learning course, which was 29.7% of all postsecondary students (U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics 2018). In 2017, the Online Learning Consortium reported an almost 4% increase in online learning students in 2015 as compared to the previous two years. Although online learning is becoming more prevalent, there has been little to no research to determine what makes online learning most effective. Those that have, either have not compared modalities (i.e., only testing one format) (Sella et al. 2014; Walker and Rehfeldt 2012) or have focused on another aspect of the learning (e.g., does grading anonymously affect performance) (Liu et al. 2018). Determining the components of online learning that lead to better student outcomes will add to the current literature and improve online learning as a whole. The primary purpose of this experiment was to determine what forms of discussion (synchronous vs asynchronous) are most effective in an asynchronous online master-level applied behavior analysis course.

鉴于COVID-19大流行已将大多数教育服务转移到在线平台,在线学习在教育中极为普遍,比以往任何时候都更加普遍。更具体地说,2015年,近600万学生至少参加了一门在线学习课程,占所有高等教育学生的29.7%(美国教育部,国家教育统计中心2018年)。2017年,在线学习联盟报告称,与前两年相比,2015年在线学习的学生增加了近4%。尽管在线学习正变得越来越普遍,但几乎没有研究来确定是什么使在线学习最有效。那些有,要么没有比较模式(即,只测试一种格式)(Sella et al. 2014;Walker and Rehfeldt 2012)或者专注于学习的另一个方面(例如,匿名评分是否会影响成绩)(Liu et al. 2018)。确定导致更好的学生成绩的在线学习的组成部分将增加当前的文献,并从整体上改善在线学习。这个实验的主要目的是确定哪种形式的讨论(同步还是异步)在异步在线硕士级应用行为分析课程中最有效。
{"title":"The Effect of Synchronous Discussion Sessions in an Asynchronous Course.","authors":"Jesslyn N Farros,&nbsp;Lesley A Shawler,&nbsp;Ksenia S Gatzunis,&nbsp;Mary Jane Weiss","doi":"10.1007/s10864-020-09421-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-020-09421-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Online learning is extremely prevalent in education, more than ever given the COVID-19 pandemic that has shifted most educational services to an online platform. More specifically, in 2015, close to six million students were taking at least one online learning course, which was 29.7% of all postsecondary students (U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics 2018). In 2017, the Online Learning Consortium reported an almost 4% increase in online learning students in 2015 as compared to the previous two years. Although online learning is becoming more prevalent, there has been little to no research to determine what makes online learning most effective. Those that have, either have not compared modalities (i.e., only testing one format) (Sella et al. 2014; Walker and Rehfeldt 2012) or have focused on another aspect of the learning (e.g., does grading anonymously affect performance) (Liu et al. 2018). Determining the components of online learning that lead to better student outcomes will add to the current literature and improve online learning as a whole. The primary purpose of this experiment was to determine what forms of discussion (synchronous vs asynchronous) are most effective in an asynchronous online master-level applied behavior analysis course.</p>","PeriodicalId":47391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Education","volume":"31 4","pages":"718-730"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10864-020-09421-2","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38590913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
Effects of Multilevel Supports on Special Education Preschool Teacher Implementation of Function-Based Interventions 多层次支持对特殊教育幼儿教师实施功能干预的影响
IF 2 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2021-12-02 DOI: 10.1007/s10864-021-09461-2
Mandy Rispoli, Marie David, Emily Gregori, Rose A. Mason, Catharine Lory
{"title":"Effects of Multilevel Supports on Special Education Preschool Teacher Implementation of Function-Based Interventions","authors":"Mandy Rispoli, Marie David, Emily Gregori, Rose A. Mason, Catharine Lory","doi":"10.1007/s10864-021-09461-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-021-09461-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Education","volume":"32 1","pages":"430 - 449"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41349572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Updated Meta-Analysis of the Research on Response Cards 回应卡研究的更新元分析
IF 2 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.1007/s10864-021-09463-0
R. Marsh, Therese M. Cumming, Justus J. Randolph, Stephen Michaels
{"title":"Updated Meta-Analysis of the Research on Response Cards","authors":"R. Marsh, Therese M. Cumming, Justus J. Randolph, Stephen Michaels","doi":"10.1007/s10864-021-09463-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-021-09463-0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Education","volume":"32 1","pages":"450 - 473"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43068203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does Intervention Session Length Matter? A Comparison of a Math Intervention Across Three Durations 干预疗程长短有影响吗?三个持续时间的数学干预的比较
IF 2 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2021-11-19 DOI: 10.1007/s10864-021-09460-3
Emily R. DeFouw, Melissa A. Collier‐Meek, Brian Daniels, Robin S. Codding, Margarida B. Veiga
{"title":"Does Intervention Session Length Matter? A Comparison of a Math Intervention Across Three Durations","authors":"Emily R. DeFouw, Melissa A. Collier‐Meek, Brian Daniels, Robin S. Codding, Margarida B. Veiga","doi":"10.1007/s10864-021-09460-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-021-09460-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Education","volume":"32 1","pages":"500 - 526"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41689633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Examining the Impact of Task Difficulty on Student Engagement and Learning Rates 考察任务难度对学生参与度和学习率的影响
IF 2 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2021-11-17 DOI: 10.1007/s10864-021-09465-y
Alexis Pavlov, Gary J. Duhon, Jillian M. Dawes
{"title":"Examining the Impact of Task Difficulty on Student Engagement and Learning Rates","authors":"Alexis Pavlov, Gary J. Duhon, Jillian M. Dawes","doi":"10.1007/s10864-021-09465-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-021-09465-y","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Education","volume":"32 1","pages":"527 - 542"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49653464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Psychometric Properties of the Behavior Assessment System for Children Student Observation System (BASC-3 SOS) with Young Children in Special Education. 儿童行为评估系统学生观察系统(BASC-3 SOS)对特殊教育幼儿的心理测量特性。
IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI: 10.1007/s10864-021-09458-x
Ellyn M Schmidt, W Andrew Rothenberg, Bridget C Davidson, Miya Barnett, Jason Jent, Heleny Cadenas, Corina Fernandez, Eileen Davis

Measuring classroom behavior among young children is important to guide assessment and intervention decisions, yet there is limited literature on appropriate direct observation tools for this purpose. This article describes the psychometric properties of the Behavior Assessment System for Children, Student Observation System (BASC-3 SOS) with 135 children ages 20 to 67 months (M = 35 months, 64% Latinx, 78% with an established developmental disability) and their teachers (N = 36) as part of a larger randomized control trial of a teacher training intervention. Inter-rater reliability on individual BASC-3 SOS behaviors ranged from poor to good. Correlations between BASC-3 SOS scores across time indicated low to moderate developmental test-retest reliability. Significant correlations between BASC-3 SOS scores and teacher ratings provided evidence for convergent, divergent, and predictive validity. Differences between BASC-3 SOS scores for children with versus without disabilities supported the tool's discriminant validity. There were no significant pre- to post-treatment changes in BASC-3 SOS scores. Overall, results provide mixed evidence for the psychometric properties of the BASC-3 SOS when used with young, diverse children with and without disabilities. Implications for clinical and research purposes are discussed.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10864-021-09458-x.

对幼儿课堂行为的测量对于指导评估和干预决策非常重要,但有关这方面适当的直接观察工具的文献却很有限。本文介绍了儿童行为评估系统--学生观察系统(BASC-3 SOS)的心理测量特性,研究对象为 135 名年龄在 20 到 67 个月之间的儿童(男 = 35 个月,64% 为拉丁裔,78% 有发育障碍)及其教师(女 = 36),这是教师培训干预大型随机对照试验的一部分。个别 BASC-3 SOS 行为的评分者间可靠性从差到好不等。不同时期 BASC-3 SOS 分数之间的相关性表明,发展测试-重复测试的可靠性为中低等。BASC-3 SOS 分数与教师评分之间的显著相关性为聚合效度、发散效度和预测效度提供了证据。残疾儿童与非残疾儿童的 BASC-3 SOS 分数之间的差异证明了该工具的区分有效性。从治疗前到治疗后,BASC-3 SOS 分数没有明显变化。总之,研究结果为 BASC-3 SOS 用于不同残疾和非残疾儿童时的心理测量特性提供了不同的证据。本研究还讨论了对临床和研究目的的影响:在线版本包含补充材料,可在 10.1007/s10864-021-09458-x.上查阅。
{"title":"Psychometric Properties of the Behavior Assessment System for Children Student Observation System (BASC-3 SOS) with Young Children in Special Education.","authors":"Ellyn M Schmidt, W Andrew Rothenberg, Bridget C Davidson, Miya Barnett, Jason Jent, Heleny Cadenas, Corina Fernandez, Eileen Davis","doi":"10.1007/s10864-021-09458-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10864-021-09458-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measuring classroom behavior among young children is important to guide assessment and intervention decisions, yet there is limited literature on appropriate direct observation tools for this purpose. This article describes the psychometric properties of the Behavior Assessment System for Children, Student Observation System (BASC-3 SOS) with 135 children ages 20 to 67 months (<i>M</i> = 35 months, 64% Latinx, 78% with an established developmental disability) and their teachers (<i>N</i> = 36) as part of a larger randomized control trial of a teacher training intervention. Inter-rater reliability on individual BASC-3 SOS behaviors ranged from poor to good. Correlations between BASC-3 SOS scores across time indicated low to moderate developmental test-retest reliability. Significant correlations between BASC-3 SOS scores and teacher ratings provided evidence for convergent, divergent, and predictive validity. Differences between BASC-3 SOS scores for children with versus without disabilities supported the tool's discriminant validity. There were no significant pre- to post-treatment changes in BASC-3 SOS scores. Overall, results provide mixed evidence for the psychometric properties of the BASC-3 SOS when used with young, diverse children with and without disabilities. Implications for clinical and research purposes are discussed.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10864-021-09458-x.</p>","PeriodicalId":47391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Education","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8559685/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39597232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Brief and Extended Experimental Analyses of Spelling Deficits 拼写缺陷的简要扩展实验分析
IF 2 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2021-10-22 DOI: 10.1007/s10864-021-09459-w
Kimberly Reyes-Giordano, Daniel M. Fienup
{"title":"Brief and Extended Experimental Analyses of Spelling Deficits","authors":"Kimberly Reyes-Giordano, Daniel M. Fienup","doi":"10.1007/s10864-021-09459-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-021-09459-w","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Education","volume":"32 1","pages":"405 - 429"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41910042","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Integrating Behavior Support into a Reading Intervention for Fourth-Grade Students with Reading Difficulties and Inattention 将行为支持融入四年级阅读困难和注意力不集中学生的阅读干预
IF 2 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1007/s10864-021-09457-y
Garrett J. Roberts, Brooke Coté, Senaida Mehmedovic, Jessica Lerner, Kayla McCreadie, P. Strain
{"title":"Integrating Behavior Support into a Reading Intervention for Fourth-Grade Students with Reading Difficulties and Inattention","authors":"Garrett J. Roberts, Brooke Coté, Senaida Mehmedovic, Jessica Lerner, Kayla McCreadie, P. Strain","doi":"10.1007/s10864-021-09457-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-021-09457-y","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Education","volume":"32 1","pages":"277 - 299"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42093580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
期刊
Journal of Behavioral Education
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1