{"title":"The independence criterion for national courts in the preliminary reference procedure after Banco de Santander: Still the joker in the deck?","authors":"Maciej Taborowski, P. Bogdanowicz","doi":"10.54648/cola2023051","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2023051","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47406,"journal":{"name":"Common Market Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46953376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Book Review: The UK’s Withdrawal from the EU: A Legal Analysis, by Michael Dougan. (Oxford University Press, 2021)","authors":"P. Craig","doi":"10.54648/cola2023066","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2023066","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47406,"journal":{"name":"Common Market Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48179252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Book Review: The European Parliament as an Accountability Forum: Overseeing the Economic and Monetary Union, by Adina Akbik. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022)","authors":"K. Tuori","doi":"10.54648/cola2023056","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2023056","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47406,"journal":{"name":"Common Market Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49352759","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Book Review: The European Restructuring Directive, by Gerard McCormack. (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2021)","authors":"Defne Tasman","doi":"10.54648/cola2023062","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2023062","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47406,"journal":{"name":"Common Market Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48492957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Ligue des droits humains and the validity of the PNR Directive: Balancing individual rights and State powers in times of new technologies","authors":"E. Brouwer","doi":"10.54648/cola2023054","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2023054","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47406,"journal":{"name":"Common Market Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46766096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Book Review: Market Investigations: A New Competition Tool for Europe?, Edited by Massimo Motta, Martin Peitz and Heike Schweitzer. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022)","authors":"W. Sauter","doi":"10.54648/cola2023059","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2023059","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47406,"journal":{"name":"Common Market Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48421880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Twenty-two years after the first complaint against Intel’s distribution strategy was received by the European Commission, the saga continues. In January 2022, the General Court annulled the Commission’s infringement decision because it had not shown that Intel’s practices foreclosed market access, but this ruling has been appealed against by the Commission. This paper reviews the General Court’s 2022 judgment, explaining the introduction of a new approach to analysing rebates, its operationalization, and what this new approach means for the application of Article 102 TFEU to the conduct of dominant undertakings. abuse of dominant position, distribution strategy, rebates, market access foreclosure
{"title":"Rebates after the General Court’s 2022 Intel judgment","authors":"G. Monti","doi":"10.54648/cola2023005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2023005","url":null,"abstract":"Twenty-two years after the first complaint against Intel’s distribution strategy was received by the European Commission, the saga continues. In January 2022, the General Court annulled the Commission’s infringement decision because it had not shown that Intel’s practices foreclosed market access, but this ruling has been appealed against by the Commission. This paper reviews the General Court’s 2022 judgment, explaining the introduction of a new approach to analysing rebates, its operationalization, and what this new approach means for the application of Article 102 TFEU to the conduct of dominant undertakings.\u0000abuse of dominant position, distribution strategy, rebates, market access foreclosure","PeriodicalId":47406,"journal":{"name":"Common Market Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42818809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) aims to protect personal data outside EU borders by its rules on territorial scope and its restrictions on international data transfers. Despite its importance in EU fundamental rights law, the purpose and interaction of the GDPR’s protections of cross-border data processing have long been shrouded in confusion. Initiatives of EU bodies to interpret the GDPR’s safeguards illustrate the need for EU law to demonstrate clarity and consistency in defending fundamental rights outside EU borders. Only by maintaining the high level of protection required by the GDPR and the Court of Justice, can the EU’s ambitions of cross-border data protection be realized and the GDPR’s influence in third countries be maintained. data protection, GDPR, territorial scope, international data transfers, Court of Justice, European Commission, European Data Protection Board
{"title":"Protecting EU data outside EU borders under the GDPR","authors":"C. Kuner","doi":"10.54648/cola2023004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2023004","url":null,"abstract":"The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) aims to protect personal data outside EU borders by its rules on territorial scope and its restrictions on international data transfers. Despite its importance in EU fundamental rights law, the purpose and interaction of the GDPR’s protections of cross-border data processing have long been shrouded in confusion. Initiatives of EU bodies to interpret the GDPR’s safeguards illustrate the need for EU law to demonstrate clarity and consistency in defending fundamental rights outside EU borders. Only by maintaining the high level of protection required by the GDPR and the Court of Justice, can the EU’s ambitions of cross-border data protection be realized and the GDPR’s influence in third countries be maintained.\u0000data protection, GDPR, territorial scope, international data transfers, Court of Justice, European Commission, European Data Protection Board","PeriodicalId":47406,"journal":{"name":"Common Market Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45647196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Principle of ne bis in idem in EU competition law: The beginning of a new era after the ECJ’s decisions in bpost and Nordzucker?","authors":"B. Zelger","doi":"10.54648/cola2023010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2023010","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47406,"journal":{"name":"Common Market Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43313809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Economic frontiers of the rule of law: Sped-Pro v. Commission","authors":"M. Bernatt","doi":"10.54648/cola2023008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2023008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47406,"journal":{"name":"Common Market Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41624830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：