Ochsner Journal最新文献

Background: Adhesive capsulitis, also known as frozen shoulder, is a challenge to treat clinically. Common first-line treatment options are suprascapular nerve block (SSNB), intra-articular corticosteroid (IACS) injection, hydrodilatation, and physical therapy. This literature review summarizes each of these conservative treatments and discusses the evidence base for combining treatment options for potential additive benefits to improve patient outcomes (ie, pain, range of motion [ROM], and shoulder function). Methods: The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched using the search terms "adhesive capsulitis," "frozen shoulder," "corticosteroids," "physical therapy," "suprascapular nerve block," "hydrodilatation," and "conservative care." Pertinent articles were identified and synthesized to provide a comprehensive review of 4 common conservative treatments for adhesive capsulitis. Results: Combining SSNB with physical therapy and/or IACS injection and combining IACS injection with physical therapy have support in the literature for improving shoulder pain, ROM, and function, while hydrodilatation and physical therapy seem to offer some additive benefits for improving shoulder ROM when used as adjunct treatments for adhesive capsulitis. Conclusion: Adhesive capsulitis remains a challenge to treat clinically with much still unknown regarding treatment optimization. For the foreseeable future, first-line conservative management will continue to be the mainstay of managing adhesive capsulitis. Thus, knowing how to best use and optimize these various options-both individually and in combination-is vital for effective treatment.

Background: Acute decompensated heart failure accounts for more than 1 million hospitalizations in the United States every year. Beta-blockers are a first-line agent for patients experiencing heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, but beta-blocker use in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure remains low. We conducted an analysis of the existing evidence and guidelines to determine the conditions for prescribing beta-blockers to patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Methods: We searched the PubMed database for studies from 2004 to 2024 that included the search terms "beta blockers" and "acute decompensated heart failure." We included studies in which beta-blockers were used in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and excluded studies that did not study beta-blockers directly. We compiled recommendations from professional societies regarding beta-blocker usage-both for outpatients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and for patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure. Results: Studies consistently demonstrated lower rates of mortality and rehospitalization when beta-blocker therapy was maintained for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who were already on beta-blocker therapy. Conversely, withdrawal of beta-blocker therapy was associated with increased in-hospital and short-term mortality. We summarized our findings in a guideline-based flowchart to help physicians make informed decisions regarding beta-blocker therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Based on the evidence, beta-blockers should be initiated at a low dose in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who have never been on beta-blockers, provided the patient is hemodynamically stable. Conclusion: Our research and our guideline-based flowchart promote guideline-directed use of beta-blockers to improve the outcomes of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Background: While the connection between alcohol and risky behavior is well known, a clear correlation between alcohol misuse and contracting sexually transmitted infections (STIs) has not been determined. The 4-question CAGE questionnaire-the acronym stands for attitudes and activities related to alcohol use-is often administered at primary care annual visits to screen patients for alcohol abuse. This study assessed the relationship between CAGE scores and STI results to determine if the CAGE questionnaire could help determine the need for STI screening at annual visits. Methods: All patients who received a CAGE screening from 2015 to 2022 at a Gulf South health system were included in the analysis. The primary outcome of the study was the relationship between a positive CAGE score (a score ≥2) and a positive STI result. STIs included in the primary analysis were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B, syphilis, chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis. The correlation between a positive CAGE score and hepatitis C was examined as a secondary outcome. Results: A total of 40,022 patients received a CAGE screening during the study period, and 757 (1.9%) scored ≥2 on the CAGE questionnaire. Significant associations were found between a positive CAGE score and hepatitis B (odds ratio [OR]=2.69, 95% CI 1.91, 3.80; P<0.001), gonorrhea (OR=5.43, 95% CI 1.80, 16.39; P=0.003), and hepatitis C (OR=2.10, 95% CI 1.57, 2.80; P<0.001). No associations were found between a positive CAGE score and HIV, chlamydia, or trichomoniasis. No patients with a CAGE score ≥2 had a syphilis diagnosis; therefore, no syphilis analysis was possible. Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, patients with a CAGE score ≥2 may benefit from screening for hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and gonorrhea at their primary care annual visit. Early STI detection could lead to prompt treatment and prevent further transmission and complications.

Background: Spinal cord sarcoidosis, an uncommon manifestation of neurosarcoidosis, presents diagnostic and therapeutic challenges because the condition is rare and has diverse clinical manifestations that can mimic other conditions such as multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Case Report: A middle-aged African American female with a history of idiopathic intracranial hypertension and hydrocephalus with ventriculoperitoneal shunt presented with progressive, predominantly left-sided gait instability, weakness, and paresthesia. Cerebrospinal fluid showed lymphocytosis, red blood cells, elevated oligoclonal bands, and elevated kappa free light chains, concerning for multiple sclerosis. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder testing was negative. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demyelination protocol revealed normal brain imaging and a longitudinally extensive spinal cord lesion with the distinctive trident sign on contrast-enhanced axial views, consistent with spinal cord sarcoidosis. The patient was treated with intravenous methylprednisolone for 5 days, resulting in improved lower extremity strength, but ataxia and sensory deficits, especially proprioception, persisted. Follow-up imaging and examinations demonstrated continued spinal cord involvement with minimal improvement despite treatment. Conclusion: Current management guidelines for spinal cord sarcoidosis are based on limited evidence, necessitating further research to establish optimal protocols. The trident sign on MRI may distinguish spinal cord sarcoidosis from conditions such as multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Early radiologic detection could improve outcomes and reduce long-term neurologic deficits. A comprehensive multidisciplinary approach is essential for effective, patient-centered care planning.