Morgan E. PettyJohn, Taylor A. Reid, Kyla M. Cary, Kirsten M. Greer, Jacob A. Nason, Juan C. Agundez, Carin Graves, Heather L. McCauley
{"title":"“I don’t know what the hell you’d call it”: A qualitative thematic synthesis of men’s experiences with sexual violence in adulthood as contextualized by hegemonic masculinity.","authors":"Morgan E. PettyJohn, Taylor A. Reid, Kyla M. Cary, Kirsten M. Greer, Jacob A. Nason, Juan C. Agundez, Carin Graves, Heather L. McCauley","doi":"10.1037/men0000410","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000410","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47981,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Men & Masculinities","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135948787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vladislav Krivoshchekov, Olga Gulevich, Ilia Blagov
{"title":"Traditional masculinity and male violence against women: A meta-analytic examination.","authors":"Vladislav Krivoshchekov, Olga Gulevich, Ilia Blagov","doi":"10.1037/men0000426","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000426","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47981,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Men & Masculinities","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135996504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kristin D. Vierra, Diana R. Beltran, Rachael D. Robnett
{"title":"A metasynthesis exploring the role of masculinities in close male friendships.","authors":"Kristin D. Vierra, Diana R. Beltran, Rachael D. Robnett","doi":"10.1037/men0000441","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000441","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47981,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Men & Masculinities","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136374775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The sum of it all: Meta-analyses and metasyntheses in the psychology of men and masculinities.","authors":"Jeffrey C. Valentine, Y. Joel Wong","doi":"10.1037/men0000455","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000455","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47981,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Men & Masculinities","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135706457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Susanna Bennett, Kathyrn A. Robb, Johnny Andoh-Arthur, Amy Chandler, Anne Cleary, Kylie King, John Oliffe, Simon Rice, Jonathan Scourfield, Martin Seager, Zac Seidler, Tiago C. Zortea, Rory C. O'Connor
Objective. This study uses the Delphi expert consensus method to work with lived-experience experts and establish research priorities to advance our understanding of male suicide risk and recovery. Methods. Items for the Delphi were generated via findings from two recent quantitative and qualitative systematic reviews on male suicide, a comprehensive grey literature search, responses to a global survey on male suicide, and feedback from a panel of 10 international academic/clinical male suicide experts. A 2-round Delphi study was conducted to gain consensus among 242 lived-experience experts representing 34 countries on 135 potential male suicide research questions. Panellists were asked to rate each item on a 5-point Likert scale from ‘ should not be included ’ to ‘ essential ’ . Consensus was defined as 80% of respondents scoring an item as “Essential” or “Important” . Results. After 2 Delphi rounds, consensus was reached on 87 items. The final questions were then grouped by the author team and expert academic/clinical panel into thematic clusters to create a 22-point agenda of research priorities. Limitations. Like all methodologies, there are weaknesses to the Delphi method, not least that the experts employed in a Delphi study do not represent all experts on a topic. We note that many items that did not make it to the top of the research agenda related to minority experiences. All the questions prioritised in this agenda can be applied to different demographics. However, minority populations may require tailored Delphi ’s using expert panels drawn specifically from those groups. Conclusion. A final agenda of 22 research priorities was developed. Questions related to ten thematic domains: 1. Relationships with others, 2. Relationship with self, 3. Relationship with emotions, 4. Mental Health, 5. Suicidal behaviours, 6. Early life experiences, 7. Structural challenges, 8. Cultural challenges, 9. At-risk groups, and 10. Support and recovery. The three highest endorsed items related to loneliness and isolation (98%), feelings of failure (97%), and sources of stress and emotional pain (96%) for men who are suicidal.
{"title":"Establishing research priorities for investigating male suicide risk and recovery: A modified Delphi study with lived-experience experts.","authors":"Susanna Bennett, Kathyrn A. Robb, Johnny Andoh-Arthur, Amy Chandler, Anne Cleary, Kylie King, John Oliffe, Simon Rice, Jonathan Scourfield, Martin Seager, Zac Seidler, Tiago C. Zortea, Rory C. O'Connor","doi":"10.1037/men0000448","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000448","url":null,"abstract":"Objective. This study uses the Delphi expert consensus method to work with lived-experience experts and establish research priorities to advance our understanding of male suicide risk and recovery. Methods. Items for the Delphi were generated via findings from two recent quantitative and qualitative systematic reviews on male suicide, a comprehensive grey literature search, responses to a global survey on male suicide, and feedback from a panel of 10 international academic/clinical male suicide experts. A 2-round Delphi study was conducted to gain consensus among 242 lived-experience experts representing 34 countries on 135 potential male suicide research questions. Panellists were asked to rate each item on a 5-point Likert scale from ‘ should not be included ’ to ‘ essential ’ . Consensus was defined as 80% of respondents scoring an item as “Essential” or “Important” . Results. After 2 Delphi rounds, consensus was reached on 87 items. The final questions were then grouped by the author team and expert academic/clinical panel into thematic clusters to create a 22-point agenda of research priorities. Limitations. Like all methodologies, there are weaknesses to the Delphi method, not least that the experts employed in a Delphi study do not represent all experts on a topic. We note that many items that did not make it to the top of the research agenda related to minority experiences. All the questions prioritised in this agenda can be applied to different demographics. However, minority populations may require tailored Delphi ’s using expert panels drawn specifically from those groups. Conclusion. A final agenda of 22 research priorities was developed. Questions related to ten thematic domains: 1. Relationships with others, 2. Relationship with self, 3. Relationship with emotions, 4. Mental Health, 5. Suicidal behaviours, 6. Early life experiences, 7. Structural challenges, 8. Cultural challenges, 9. At-risk groups, and 10. Support and recovery. The three highest endorsed items related to loneliness and isolation (98%), feelings of failure (97%), and sources of stress and emotional pain (96%) for men who are suicidal.","PeriodicalId":47981,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Men & Masculinities","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135048303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ryon C. McDermott, Anna K. Nguyen, Andrew P. Smiler, Kyle M. Brasil, Tracey A. Smith, Jennifer Barinas, Callie E. Mims, Amaria I. Dudley, Angelia Davis, Donnie R. Lindsey
{"title":"Print media and the American Psychological Association’s guidelines for psychological practice with boys and men: A directed content analysis.","authors":"Ryon C. McDermott, Anna K. Nguyen, Andrew P. Smiler, Kyle M. Brasil, Tracey A. Smith, Jennifer Barinas, Callie E. Mims, Amaria I. Dudley, Angelia Davis, Donnie R. Lindsey","doi":"10.1037/men0000424","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000424","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47981,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Men & Masculinities","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136311066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Molly Ellenberg, Anne Speckhard, Arie W. Kruglanski
{"title":"Beyond violent extremism: A 3N perspective of inceldom.","authors":"Molly Ellenberg, Anne Speckhard, Arie W. Kruglanski","doi":"10.1037/men0000439","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000439","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47981,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Men & Masculinities","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135728241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"When and why do men negotiate assertively? It depends on specific threats to their masculinity and the negotiation topic.","authors":"Jens Mazei, Julia B. Bear, Joachim Hüffmeier","doi":"10.1037/men0000420","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000420","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47981,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Men & Masculinities","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136316302","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Acknowledgment of Ad Hoc Reviewers, 2023","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/men0000454","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000454","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47981,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Men & Masculinities","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136303775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-01Epub Date: 2022-07-28DOI: 10.1037/men0000403
Christopher Bondoc, John Bosco, Edward Z Mei, Jocelyn I Meza, Elizabeth S Barnert
Young Black and Latinx justice-involved males in the United States have unique, intersecting, and disproportionate health needs that often go unmet during reentry, the six-month period when youth return home after incarceration. Masculinity has been shown to affect various health outcomes among Black and Latinx males, who are disproportionately represented in the U.S. juvenile justice system. To better understand young Black and Latinx males' perspectives on how masculinity may impact health and health-related behaviors during reentry, we analyzed 32 longitudinal interviews from 23 participants who identified as Latinx (n=20) or Black (n=3) males discussing their health and healthcare utilization during reentry. Using deductive thematic analysis, we identified two themes on masculinity and health during reentry: 1) young Black and Latinx males undergoing reentry endorse masculine attitudes; and 2) young Black and Latinx males undergoing reentry engage in masculine behaviors that impact health. Participants linked masculine attitudes to masculine behaviors that both promote and impede health, suggesting potential opportunity to leverage health-promoting aspects of masculinity while addressing health-detracting ones to facilitate health for young Black and Latinx males.
{"title":"Perspectives of Black and Latinx Youth on Masculinity and Health During Community Reentry After Incarceration.","authors":"Christopher Bondoc, John Bosco, Edward Z Mei, Jocelyn I Meza, Elizabeth S Barnert","doi":"10.1037/men0000403","DOIUrl":"10.1037/men0000403","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Young Black and Latinx justice-involved males in the United States have unique, intersecting, and disproportionate health needs that often go unmet during reentry, the six-month period when youth return home after incarceration. Masculinity has been shown to affect various health outcomes among Black and Latinx males, who are disproportionately represented in the U.S. juvenile justice system. To better understand young Black and Latinx males' perspectives on how masculinity may impact health and health-related behaviors during reentry, we analyzed 32 longitudinal interviews from 23 participants who identified as Latinx (n=20) or Black (n=3) males discussing their health and healthcare utilization during reentry. Using deductive thematic analysis, we identified two themes on masculinity and health during reentry: 1) young Black and Latinx males undergoing reentry endorse masculine attitudes; and 2) young Black and Latinx males undergoing reentry engage in masculine behaviors that impact health. Participants linked masculine attitudes to masculine behaviors that both promote and impede health, suggesting potential opportunity to leverage health-promoting aspects of masculinity while addressing health-detracting ones to facilitate health for young Black and Latinx males.</p>","PeriodicalId":47981,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Men & Masculinities","volume":"23 4","pages":"433-444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12768490/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145913422","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：