首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation最新文献

英文 中文
Evaluation of the Accuracy of the Smart Work Injury Management (SWIM) System to Assist Case Managers in Predicting the Work Disability of Injured Workers. 评估智能工伤管理系统 (SWIM) 在协助个案经理预测受伤工人的工作残疾方面的准确性。
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-024-10199-7
Yumiki Y K Yeung, Peter Q Chen, Peter H F Ng, Andy S K Cheng

Purpose: Many countries have developed clinical decision-making support tools, such as the smart work injury management (SWIM) system in Hong Kong, to predict rehabilitation paths and address global issues related to work injury disability. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of SWIM by comparing its predictions on real work injury cases to those made by human case managers, specifically with regard to the duration of sick leave and the percentage of permanent disability.

Methods: The study analyzed a total of 442 work injury cases covering the period from 2012 to 2020, dividing them into non-litigated and litigated cases. The Kruskal-Wallis post hoc test with Bonferroni adjustment was used to evaluate the differences between the actual data, the SWIM predictions, and the estimations made by three case managers. The intra-class correlation coefficient was used to assess the inter-rater reliability of the case managers.

Results: The study discovered that the predictions made by the SWIM model and a case manager possessing approximately 4 years of experience in case management exhibited moderate reliability in non-litigated cases. Nevertheless, there was no resemblance between SWIM's predictions regarding the percentage of permanent disability and those made by case managers.

Conclusion: The findings indicate that SWIM is capable of replicating the sick leave estimations made by a case manager with an estimated 4 years of case management experience, albeit with limitations in generalizability owing to the small sample size of case managers involved in the study.

Implications: These findings represent a significant advancement in enhancing the accuracy of CDMS for work injury cases in Hong Kong, signaling progress in the field.

目的:许多国家已经开发了临床决策支持工具,如香港的智能工伤管理系统(SWIM),以预测康复路径并解决与工伤残疾相关的全球性问题。本研究旨在通过比较 SWIM 对真实工伤病例的预测与人工病例管理人员的预测,评估 SWIM 的准确性,特别是在病假持续时间和永久残疾比例方面:研究分析了 2012 年至 2020 年期间的 442 起工伤案件,将其分为非诉讼案件和诉讼案件。采用 Kruskal-Wallis 后验法和 Bonferroni 调整来评估实际数据、SWIM 预测和三位案件管理者估算之间的差异。使用类内相关系数来评估个案管理者之间的可靠性:研究发现,在非诉讼案件中,SWIM 模型和一名拥有约 4 年案件管理经验的案件管理者所做的预测表现出适度的可靠性。然而,SWIM 对永久性残疾百分比的预测与案件经理的预测并不相似:结论:研究结果表明,尽管由于参与研究的个案经理样本量较小,因此在推广性方面存在局限性,但 SWIM 能够复制具有约 4 年个案管理经验的个案经理所做的病假估计:这些研究结果标志着香港在提高工伤个案病假管理系统的准确性方面取得了重大进展,预示着该领域的进步。
{"title":"Evaluation of the Accuracy of the Smart Work Injury Management (SWIM) System to Assist Case Managers in Predicting the Work Disability of Injured Workers.","authors":"Yumiki Y K Yeung, Peter Q Chen, Peter H F Ng, Andy S K Cheng","doi":"10.1007/s10926-024-10199-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-024-10199-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Many countries have developed clinical decision-making support tools, such as the smart work injury management (SWIM) system in Hong Kong, to predict rehabilitation paths and address global issues related to work injury disability. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of SWIM by comparing its predictions on real work injury cases to those made by human case managers, specifically with regard to the duration of sick leave and the percentage of permanent disability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study analyzed a total of 442 work injury cases covering the period from 2012 to 2020, dividing them into non-litigated and litigated cases. The Kruskal-Wallis post hoc test with Bonferroni adjustment was used to evaluate the differences between the actual data, the SWIM predictions, and the estimations made by three case managers. The intra-class correlation coefficient was used to assess the inter-rater reliability of the case managers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study discovered that the predictions made by the SWIM model and a case manager possessing approximately 4 years of experience in case management exhibited moderate reliability in non-litigated cases. Nevertheless, there was no resemblance between SWIM's predictions regarding the percentage of permanent disability and those made by case managers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings indicate that SWIM is capable of replicating the sick leave estimations made by a case manager with an estimated 4 years of case management experience, albeit with limitations in generalizability owing to the small sample size of case managers involved in the study.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>These findings represent a significant advancement in enhancing the accuracy of CDMS for work injury cases in Hong Kong, signaling progress in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141318652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lifestyle Dimensions of Public Safety Personnel Families: There's No Life Like It. 公共安全人员家庭的生活方式:无与伦比的生活
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-024-10213-y
Heidi Cramm, Marilyn Cox, Deborah Norris, Nathalie Reid, Linna Tam-Seto, Rachel Dekel, Nicola T Fear, Lisa Delaney, Rachel Richmond, Alyson Mahar

Purpose: The nature and cumulative occupational demands imposed on families of public safety personnel (PSP) are substantial, in many cases non-negotiable, and distinct from the general population accentuating risk factors for family well-being. Despite this reality, the contributions of PSP families are not well understood, and a conceptual framework is needed. The aim of this paper is to summarize contextual factors (lifestyle dimensions) that shape the lives of PSP families; factors supported in the existing, albeit limited, body of research.

Methods: Grounded in the interpretive/constructivist paradigm, a synthesis was central to understanding the lived experiences of PSP families. An interdisciplinary research team engaged in an iterative process of framework analysis to capture the variability and complexity of PSP family life and distilled the overarching lifestyle dimensions.

Results: Three lifestyle dimensions-logistics, risks, and identities-emerged from contextual factors and represent distinct aspects of PSP family life. PSP families play a crucial role in that their capacity to accommodate the lifestyle dimensions (i.e., logistics, risks, and identities), without which the PSP could not meet the demands of the profession.

Conclusion: Promoting awareness of these dimensions and their consequent demands underscores the cumulative demands that put PSP families at risk. Responses from governments, public safety organizations, and communities are required to help PSP families manage non-negotiable elements of the public safety occupation that spill over into family life over which they have no control.

目的:公共安全人员(PSP)家庭的性质和累积的职业要求是巨大的,在许多情况下是不可协商的,并且有别于一般人群,突出了家庭幸福的风险因素。尽管现实如此,但人们对公共安全人员家庭的贡献还不甚了解,因此需要一个概念框架。本文旨在总结塑造 PSP 家庭生活的背景因素(生活方式维度);这些因素在现有的尽管有限的研究中得到了支持:方法:以解释/建构主义范式为基础,综合理解 PSP 家庭的生活经历。一个跨学科研究小组参与了框架分析的迭代过程,以捕捉 PSP 家庭生活的多变性和复杂性,并提炼出总体生活方式维度:三个生活方式维度--后勤、风险和身份--从背景因素中产生,代表了 PSP 家庭生活的不同方面。PSP 家庭在适应生活方式维度(即后勤、风险和身份)的能力方面发挥着至关重要的作用,没有这些维度,PSP 就无法满足职业要求:结论:提高对这些方面及其随之而来的需求的认识强调了使私营保安公司家庭处于危险之中的累积需求。政府、公共安全组织和社区需要采取应对措施,帮助私营保安公司的家庭处理公共安全职业中的不可协商因素,这些因素会影响到他们无法控制的家庭生活。
{"title":"Lifestyle Dimensions of Public Safety Personnel Families: There's No Life Like It.","authors":"Heidi Cramm, Marilyn Cox, Deborah Norris, Nathalie Reid, Linna Tam-Seto, Rachel Dekel, Nicola T Fear, Lisa Delaney, Rachel Richmond, Alyson Mahar","doi":"10.1007/s10926-024-10213-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-024-10213-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The nature and cumulative occupational demands imposed on families of public safety personnel (PSP) are substantial, in many cases non-negotiable, and distinct from the general population accentuating risk factors for family well-being. Despite this reality, the contributions of PSP families are not well understood, and a conceptual framework is needed. The aim of this paper is to summarize contextual factors (lifestyle dimensions) that shape the lives of PSP families; factors supported in the existing, albeit limited, body of research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Grounded in the interpretive/constructivist paradigm, a synthesis was central to understanding the lived experiences of PSP families. An interdisciplinary research team engaged in an iterative process of framework analysis to capture the variability and complexity of PSP family life and distilled the overarching lifestyle dimensions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three lifestyle dimensions-logistics, risks, and identities-emerged from contextual factors and represent distinct aspects of PSP family life. PSP families play a crucial role in that their capacity to accommodate the lifestyle dimensions (i.e., logistics, risks, and identities), without which the PSP could not meet the demands of the profession.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Promoting awareness of these dimensions and their consequent demands underscores the cumulative demands that put PSP families at risk. Responses from governments, public safety organizations, and communities are required to help PSP families manage non-negotiable elements of the public safety occupation that spill over into family life over which they have no control.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141312011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation of the Maastricht Work-Related Support Intervention for Healthcare Professionals in Clinical Care. 对马斯特里赫特医疗保健专业人员临床护理工作相关支持干预的混合方法过程评估。
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-024-10211-0
Maarten Butink, Annelies Boonen, Tim Boymans, Vera Baadjou, Emmelie Hazelzet, Angelique de Rijk

Purpose: To perform the process evaluation of an intervention that aims to facilitate clinical healthcare professionals (HCP) to provide Maastricht Work-Related Support (WRS) to working patients with a chronic disease.

Methods: A mixed-methods approach was applied to address reach, efficacy, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM framework) as well as context of the Maastricht WRS intervention. Qualitative data included interviews with HCPs (N = 10), patients at two time points (N = 10 and N = 9), and field notes. Quantitative data included screening logbooks of HCPs, patient screening forms, and a questionnaire for patients. Content analysis or computation of frequencies was applied where applicable.

Results: Twenty-eight HCPs participated in the intervention (reach). They had a low attitude toward providing Maastricht WRS themselves (adoption). During clinical consultations, they addressed work for 770 of 1,624 (47%) persons of working age. Only 57% (437/770) had paid work, of which 10% (44/437) acknowledged a current need for support. Discussing work during clinical consultations by HCPs was hindered by other medical priorities and patients not disclosing problems (implementation). Over time, Maastricht WRS was less consistently provided (maintenance). Patients reported a positive impact of the intervention, such as fitness for work (efficacy). Context (e.g., lack of urgency, priority, time, and management support) played a pivotal role in the implementation.

Conclusion: This evaluation showed that HCPs had a positive attitude toward WRS in general, but their attitude toward provide Maastricht WRS themselves in daily clinical care was low. Recommendations include improving HCPs' attitude, addressing WRS as a key policy point, and facilitating time.

目的:对一项旨在促进临床医护专业人员(HCP)为在职慢性病患者提供马斯特里赫特工作相关支持(WRS)的干预措施进行过程评估:方法:采用混合方法解决马斯特里赫特工作相关支持干预的覆盖范围、效果、采用、实施和维护(RE-AIM 框架)以及背景问题。定性数据包括对高级保健人员(10 人)、两个时间点的患者(10 人和 9 人)的访谈以及现场记录。定量数据包括保健医生的筛查记录、患者筛查表和患者问卷。在适当的情况下进行内容分析或频率计算:结果:28 名保健医生参与了干预(达到率)。他们对自己提供马斯特里赫特 WRS 的态度不积极(采纳)。在临床咨询过程中,他们为 1,624 名(47%)处于工作年龄的人中的 770 人提供了服务。只有 57%(437/770)的人有带薪工作,其中 10%(44/437)的人承认目前需要支持。由于其他医疗优先事项和病人不透露问题(实施),妨碍了保健医生在临床会诊期间讨论工作问题。随着时间的推移,马斯特里赫特 WRS 提供的一致性降低(维持)。患者报告称,干预措施产生了积极的影响,例如提高了工作能力(疗效)。在实施过程中,环境(如缺乏紧迫性、优先性、时间和管理支持)起到了关键作用:评估结果表明,医疗保健人员总体上对 WRS 持积极态度,但对在日常临床护理中使用马斯特里赫特 WRS 的态度却不积极。建议包括改善医护人员的态度,将 WRS 作为一项关键的政策要点,并为时间提供便利。
{"title":"A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation of the Maastricht Work-Related Support Intervention for Healthcare Professionals in Clinical Care.","authors":"Maarten Butink, Annelies Boonen, Tim Boymans, Vera Baadjou, Emmelie Hazelzet, Angelique de Rijk","doi":"10.1007/s10926-024-10211-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-024-10211-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To perform the process evaluation of an intervention that aims to facilitate clinical healthcare professionals (HCP) to provide Maastricht Work-Related Support (WRS) to working patients with a chronic disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods approach was applied to address reach, efficacy, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM framework) as well as context of the Maastricht WRS intervention. Qualitative data included interviews with HCPs (N = 10), patients at two time points (N = 10 and N = 9), and field notes. Quantitative data included screening logbooks of HCPs, patient screening forms, and a questionnaire for patients. Content analysis or computation of frequencies was applied where applicable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight HCPs participated in the intervention (reach). They had a low attitude toward providing Maastricht WRS themselves (adoption). During clinical consultations, they addressed work for 770 of 1,624 (47%) persons of working age. Only 57% (437/770) had paid work, of which 10% (44/437) acknowledged a current need for support. Discussing work during clinical consultations by HCPs was hindered by other medical priorities and patients not disclosing problems (implementation). Over time, Maastricht WRS was less consistently provided (maintenance). Patients reported a positive impact of the intervention, such as fitness for work (efficacy). Context (e.g., lack of urgency, priority, time, and management support) played a pivotal role in the implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This evaluation showed that HCPs had a positive attitude toward WRS in general, but their attitude toward provide Maastricht WRS themselves in daily clinical care was low. Recommendations include improving HCPs' attitude, addressing WRS as a key policy point, and facilitating time.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141297039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Elements of Return-to-Work Interventions for Workers on Long-Term Sick Leave: A Systematic Literature Review. 针对长期病假工人的重返工作干预措施要素:系统性文献综述。
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2024-06-07 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-024-10203-0
Christa J C de Geus, Maaike A Huysmans, H Jolanda van Rijssen, Marianne de Maaker-Berkhof, Linda J Schoonmade, Johannes R Anema

Purpose: The aim of this systematic review is to identify vocational rehabilitation (VR) interventions that are effective to enhance return-to-work (RTW) for people on long-term sick leave (> 90 days) and to identify main elements of these interventions.

Methods: Six electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies published up to February 2022. Each article was screened independently by two different reviewers. Thereafter, one author performed the data-extraction which was checked by another author. The EPHPP quality assessment tool was used to appraise the methodological quality of the studies.

Results: 11.837 articles were identified. 21 articles were included in the review, which described 25 interventions. Results showed that ten interventions were more effective than usual care on RTW. Two interventions had mixed results. The effective interventions varied widely in content, but were often more extensive than usual care. Common elements of the effective interventions were: coaching, counseling and motivational interviewing, planning return to work, placing the worker in work or teaching practical skills and advising at the workplace. However, these elements were also common in interventions that were not effective on RTW compared to usual care and can therefore not explain why certain interventions are effective and others are not.

Conclusion: The effective interventions included in this study were often quite extensive and aimed at multiple phases of the RTW-process of the worker. In the future, researchers need to describe the population and the content of the investigated interventions more elaborate to be able to better compare VR interventions and determine what elements make interventions effective.

目的:本系统性综述旨在确定有效促进长期病假(大于 90 天)者重返工作岗位(RTW)的职业康复(VR)干预措施,并确定这些干预措施的主要内容:我们在六个电子数据库中搜索了截至 2022 年 2 月发表的经同行评审的研究文章。每篇文章均由两名不同的审稿人独立筛选。之后,由一位作者进行数据提取,并由另一位作者进行检查。EPHPP 质量评估工具用于评估研究的方法学质量:结果:共发现 11837 篇文章。21 篇文章被纳入综述,其中介绍了 25 种干预措施。结果显示,在复工方面,10 项干预措施比常规护理更有效。两项干预措施的效果参差不齐。有效干预措施的内容差别很大,但通常比常规护理更广泛。有效干预措施的共同要素包括:辅导、咨询和动机访谈、规划重返工作、安排工人工作或教授实用技能以及在工作场所提供建议。然而,与常规护理相比,这些要素在对复工无效的干预措施中也很常见,因此无法解释为什么某些干预措施有效而其他干预措施无效:本研究中包含的有效干预措施通常相当广泛,针对工人复工过程中的多个阶段。今后,研究人员需要更详细地描述所调查干预措施的人群和内容,以便更好地比较自愿退休干预措施,并确定哪些因素使干预措施有效。
{"title":"Elements of Return-to-Work Interventions for Workers on Long-Term Sick Leave: A Systematic Literature Review.","authors":"Christa J C de Geus, Maaike A Huysmans, H Jolanda van Rijssen, Marianne de Maaker-Berkhof, Linda J Schoonmade, Johannes R Anema","doi":"10.1007/s10926-024-10203-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-024-10203-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this systematic review is to identify vocational rehabilitation (VR) interventions that are effective to enhance return-to-work (RTW) for people on long-term sick leave (> 90 days) and to identify main elements of these interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies published up to February 2022. Each article was screened independently by two different reviewers. Thereafter, one author performed the data-extraction which was checked by another author. The EPHPP quality assessment tool was used to appraise the methodological quality of the studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>11.837 articles were identified. 21 articles were included in the review, which described 25 interventions. Results showed that ten interventions were more effective than usual care on RTW. Two interventions had mixed results. The effective interventions varied widely in content, but were often more extensive than usual care. Common elements of the effective interventions were: coaching, counseling and motivational interviewing, planning return to work, placing the worker in work or teaching practical skills and advising at the workplace. However, these elements were also common in interventions that were not effective on RTW compared to usual care and can therefore not explain why certain interventions are effective and others are not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effective interventions included in this study were often quite extensive and aimed at multiple phases of the RTW-process of the worker. In the future, researchers need to describe the population and the content of the investigated interventions more elaborate to be able to better compare VR interventions and determine what elements make interventions effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141288778","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Therapeutic Approaches for the Prevention of Upper Limb Repetitive Strain Injuries in Work-Related Computer Use: A Scoping Review. 预防与工作有关的电脑使用中上肢重复性劳损的治疗方法:范围综述》。
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-024-10204-z
Alita de Waal, Amy Killian, Afika Gagela, Jada Baartzes, Susan de Klerk

Purpose: To explore and describe therapeutic approaches for the prevention of upper limb (UL) repetitive strain injuries (RSI) amongst computer users in the twenty-first century.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted using the method described by Arksey and O'Malley, further enhanced by Levac et al. to ensure rigor, validity and reliability during analysis. Key concepts pertaining to the research question have been mapped, following comprehensive searches of relevant electronic databases namely EBSCOHost (Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, eBook Collection, E-Journals, Health Source-Consumer Edition, Health Sources-Nursing/Academic Edition and MEDLINE), PUBMED and Google Scholar. The identified studies have been presented in a descriptive numerical summary to address the research aim.

Results: From the 577 studies initially identified, 58 studies were eligible for inclusion in the scoping review after abstract and full text screening. Strategies for the prevention of UL RSIs in computer users were categorised into overarching types of intervention as well as the factors which contribute towards sustained implementation of prevention strategies. Using ergonomic equipment was the most prevalent approach during intervention, breaks and rest periods were found to be the less common intervention offered to prevent RSIs. The majority of the studies noted personal worksite adjustments, including adjustments of the chair, back rest, lumbar support, handles or any arm support to the individual as a strategy to prevent UL RSIs. In high income countries the use of ergonomic equipment was the most common type of approach during intervention, in middle income countries stretches were the most common therapeutic intervention strategy and in low-income countries there was an even distribution between a number of different therapeutic interventions aimed at preventing RSIs.

Conclusions: The review provides an overview of approaches and a comprehensive baseline for identifying further research required to generate prevention approaches. The information within the review may be used to impact company practice, policy and decision making in terms of developing prevention strategies.

目的:探讨并描述二十一世纪电脑使用者预防上肢(UL)重复性劳损(RSI)的治疗方法:采用 Arksey 和 O'Malley 所描述的方法进行了范围界定综述,Levac 等人对该方法进行了进一步改进,以确保分析过程的严谨性、有效性和可靠性。在对相关电子数据库,即 EBSCOHost(学术搜索首屈一指、CINAHL、电子图书集、电子期刊、健康来源-消费者版、健康来源-护理/学术版和 MEDLINE)、PUBMED 和谷歌学术进行全面搜索后,绘制了与研究问题相关的关键概念图。针对研究目的,对所确定的研究进行了描述性数字汇总:在初步确定的 577 项研究中,经过摘要和全文筛选,有 58 项研究符合纳入范围界定综述的条件。研究人员将预防计算机用户UL RSI的策略分为几大类干预措施以及有助于持续实施预防策略的因素。在干预过程中,使用符合人体工程学的设备是最普遍的方法,而休息和休息时间则是较少见的预防 RSI 的干预措施。大多数研究指出,个人工作场所的调整,包括椅子、靠背、腰部支撑、手柄或任何手臂支撑的调整,都是预防 UL RSI 的策略。在高收入国家,使用人体工程学设备是干预过程中最常见的方法,在中等收入国家,拉伸是最常见的治疗干预策略,而在低收入国家,旨在预防RSI的各种治疗干预措施的分布较为均衡:本综述概述了各种方法,并提供了一个全面的基线,用于确定产生预防方法所需的进一步研究。综述中的信息可用来影响公司在制定预防策略方面的实践、政策和决策。
{"title":"Therapeutic Approaches for the Prevention of Upper Limb Repetitive Strain Injuries in Work-Related Computer Use: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Alita de Waal, Amy Killian, Afika Gagela, Jada Baartzes, Susan de Klerk","doi":"10.1007/s10926-024-10204-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-024-10204-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore and describe therapeutic approaches for the prevention of upper limb (UL) repetitive strain injuries (RSI) amongst computer users in the twenty-first century.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted using the method described by Arksey and O'Malley, further enhanced by Levac et al. to ensure rigor, validity and reliability during analysis. Key concepts pertaining to the research question have been mapped, following comprehensive searches of relevant electronic databases namely EBSCOHost (Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, eBook Collection, E-Journals, Health Source-Consumer Edition, Health Sources-Nursing/Academic Edition and MEDLINE), PUBMED and Google Scholar. The identified studies have been presented in a descriptive numerical summary to address the research aim.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the 577 studies initially identified, 58 studies were eligible for inclusion in the scoping review after abstract and full text screening. Strategies for the prevention of UL RSIs in computer users were categorised into overarching types of intervention as well as the factors which contribute towards sustained implementation of prevention strategies. Using ergonomic equipment was the most prevalent approach during intervention, breaks and rest periods were found to be the less common intervention offered to prevent RSIs. The majority of the studies noted personal worksite adjustments, including adjustments of the chair, back rest, lumbar support, handles or any arm support to the individual as a strategy to prevent UL RSIs. In high income countries the use of ergonomic equipment was the most common type of approach during intervention, in middle income countries stretches were the most common therapeutic intervention strategy and in low-income countries there was an even distribution between a number of different therapeutic interventions aimed at preventing RSIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The review provides an overview of approaches and a comprehensive baseline for identifying further research required to generate prevention approaches. The information within the review may be used to impact company practice, policy and decision making in terms of developing prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141285026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dutch Dataset Vocational Rehabilitation for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Baseline Patients' Characteristics and Program Eligibility. 荷兰慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛职业康复数据集:基线患者特征和项目资格。
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-024-10207-w
Fred A de Laat, Vera Killen, Michel J A Edelaar, Janneke Nachtegaal, Michiel F Reneman

Purpose: Vocational rehabilitation (VR) is an intervention to improve return to work for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP). However, a systematic overview of characteristics of referred patients or eligible for VR is lacking, which hinders comparability across studies. Objectives were (1) to describe characteristics of patients with CMP referred to and eligible for VR and (2) to identify factors that contribute to VR eligibility.

Methods: This study used a multicenter, cross-sectional design. Data of self-reported questionnaires were obtained between 2013 and 2019 from care as usual of eight Dutch VR centers. Descriptive statistics were performed to describe sociodemographic, pain-related, and work-related characteristics. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors contributing to VR eligibility.

Results: Data sets of n = 2970 referred patients were included. The mean age was 46 years and 60% were female. Low back (43%), neck (37%), and shoulder pain (34%) were most reported. 82% Worked in paid employment. The absenteeism rate was 85%, and 44% was partially absent. After multidisciplinary screening, 62.2% were eligible for VR. Persons most likely to be eligible for VR (OR < 1.20) were those having back or neck pain, whereas least eligible (OR < 0.80) were persons having pain in hand/fingers or pain in other regions, unemployed workers, and those referred by a 'other' medical specialists. All other factors contributed little or none to the model.

Conclusions: An extensive description of sociodemographic, pain-related, and work-related characteristics is presented for patients eligible for VR. Especially having back/neck pain and being an employee were associated with higher chance of eligibility for VR.

目的:职业康复(VR)是一种改善慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛(CMP)患者重返工作岗位的干预措施。然而,目前还缺乏对转诊患者或符合职业康复条件的患者特征的系统概述,这阻碍了各项研究之间的可比性。研究目的是:(1)描述转诊至康复治疗中心或符合康复治疗条件的慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的特征;(2)确定有助于获得康复治疗资格的因素:本研究采用多中心横断面设计。方法:本研究采用多中心横断面设计,在 2013 年至 2019 年期间从荷兰 8 个 VR 中心的常规护理中获得了自我报告问卷数据。对社会人口学、疼痛相关和工作相关特征进行了描述性统计。采用逻辑回归分析来确定导致VR资格的因素:结果:共纳入了 2970 名转诊患者的数据集。平均年龄为 46 岁,60% 为女性。报告最多的是腰痛(43%)、颈痛(37%)和肩痛(34%)。82%的患者从事有偿工作。缺勤率为 85%,44% 为部分缺勤。经过多学科筛查,62.2%的人符合接受自愿回归的条件。最有可能符合自愿回归条件的人(OR 结论):该报告广泛介绍了符合自愿康复条件的患者的社会人口学特征、疼痛相关特征和工作相关特征。特别是背部/颈部疼痛和雇员与符合 VR 资格的几率更高相关。
{"title":"Dutch Dataset Vocational Rehabilitation for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Baseline Patients' Characteristics and Program Eligibility.","authors":"Fred A de Laat, Vera Killen, Michel J A Edelaar, Janneke Nachtegaal, Michiel F Reneman","doi":"10.1007/s10926-024-10207-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-024-10207-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Vocational rehabilitation (VR) is an intervention to improve return to work for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP). However, a systematic overview of characteristics of referred patients or eligible for VR is lacking, which hinders comparability across studies. Objectives were (1) to describe characteristics of patients with CMP referred to and eligible for VR and (2) to identify factors that contribute to VR eligibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a multicenter, cross-sectional design. Data of self-reported questionnaires were obtained between 2013 and 2019 from care as usual of eight Dutch VR centers. Descriptive statistics were performed to describe sociodemographic, pain-related, and work-related characteristics. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors contributing to VR eligibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data sets of n = 2970 referred patients were included. The mean age was 46 years and 60% were female. Low back (43%), neck (37%), and shoulder pain (34%) were most reported. 82% Worked in paid employment. The absenteeism rate was 85%, and 44% was partially absent. After multidisciplinary screening, 62.2% were eligible for VR. Persons most likely to be eligible for VR (OR < 1.20) were those having back or neck pain, whereas least eligible (OR < 0.80) were persons having pain in hand/fingers or pain in other regions, unemployed workers, and those referred by a 'other' medical specialists. All other factors contributed little or none to the model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An extensive description of sociodemographic, pain-related, and work-related characteristics is presented for patients eligible for VR. Especially having back/neck pain and being an employee were associated with higher chance of eligibility for VR.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141238795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Work Adjustments by Types of Occupations Amongst People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Survey Study. 多发性硬化症患者按职业类型划分的工作调整:一项调查研究。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-03 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-023-10142-2
Alejandra Machado, Chantelle Murley, Jessica Dervish, Fitsum Sebsibe Teni, Emilie Friberg

Purpose: To explore the occurrence of work adjustments for people with multiple sclerosis (MS) across types of occupations (managerial, office, and manual workers).

Methods: All working-aged (20-50 years) residents in Sweden diagnosed with MS were invited to participate in a web-based survey in 2021. Responses were linked to individual-level nationwide registers. Descriptive analyses were conducted to compare sociodemographic and clinical variables across occupations as well as other responses. The odds ratio of having any adjustment at work was determined using multinomial logistic regression.

Results: From all 4412 respondents (52% response rate), 3313 employees were included. The majority were women (72%) and had low (24.2%) or mild disease severity (44.7%). Nevertheless, different work adjustments across occupations were observed. Compared to the other occupations, office workers reported more invisible symptoms, more work adjustments and considered adapted schedules as the most important adjustment. On the contrary, more managers reported having no limiting symptoms and consequently, disclosed their diagnosis less often. They also reported having fewer work adjustments and more opportunities to modify their work than office and manual workers. Manual workers had a higher likelihood to report needing more support at work than office workers and managers. Further, a higher likelihood of having work adjustments was associated with progressive MS, higher MS severity, and invisible symptoms.

Conclusion: A more severe clinical profile of MS was associated with having work adjustments. The physical demands and responsibilities of an occupation play an important role when requesting and getting work adjustments amongst employees with MS.

目的:探讨多发性硬化症(MS)患者在不同职业(管理、办公室和体力劳动者)中工作调整的发生情况。方法:2021年,瑞典所有被诊断为MS的工作年龄(20-50岁)居民都被邀请参加一项基于网络的调查。答复与个人一级的全国登记册挂钩。进行描述性分析,比较不同职业的社会人口统计学和临床变量以及其他反应。在工作中进行任何调整的比值比是使用多项逻辑回归确定的。结果:在4412名受访者中(52%的回答率),3313名员工被包括在内。大多数是女性(72%),疾病严重程度较低(24.2%)或较轻(44.7%)。然而,不同职业的工作调整不同。与其他职业相比,上班族报告了更多的隐形症状、更多的工作调整,并认为调整时间表是最重要的调整。相反,更多的管理者报告说没有限制性症状,因此,披露诊断的频率更低。他们还报告说,与办公室和体力劳动者相比,他们的工作调整更少,修改工作的机会更多。体力劳动者比上班族和经理更有可能报告在工作中需要更多的支持。此外,工作调整的可能性越高,与进行性多发性硬化症、严重程度越高和症状不明显有关。结论:更严重的MS临床表现与工作调整有关。当MS员工要求和获得工作调整时,身体需求和职业责任发挥着重要作用。
{"title":"Work Adjustments by Types of Occupations Amongst People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Survey Study.","authors":"Alejandra Machado, Chantelle Murley, Jessica Dervish, Fitsum Sebsibe Teni, Emilie Friberg","doi":"10.1007/s10926-023-10142-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10926-023-10142-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the occurrence of work adjustments for people with multiple sclerosis (MS) across types of occupations (managerial, office, and manual workers).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All working-aged (20-50 years) residents in Sweden diagnosed with MS were invited to participate in a web-based survey in 2021. Responses were linked to individual-level nationwide registers. Descriptive analyses were conducted to compare sociodemographic and clinical variables across occupations as well as other responses. The odds ratio of having any adjustment at work was determined using multinomial logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From all 4412 respondents (52% response rate), 3313 employees were included. The majority were women (72%) and had low (24.2%) or mild disease severity (44.7%). Nevertheless, different work adjustments across occupations were observed. Compared to the other occupations, office workers reported more invisible symptoms, more work adjustments and considered adapted schedules as the most important adjustment. On the contrary, more managers reported having no limiting symptoms and consequently, disclosed their diagnosis less often. They also reported having fewer work adjustments and more opportunities to modify their work than office and manual workers. Manual workers had a higher likelihood to report needing more support at work than office workers and managers. Further, a higher likelihood of having work adjustments was associated with progressive MS, higher MS severity, and invisible symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A more severe clinical profile of MS was associated with having work adjustments. The physical demands and responsibilities of an occupation play an important role when requesting and getting work adjustments amongst employees with MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"461-471"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11180149/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71487486","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Neat Gizmo!/That Looks Scary: Employer Reactions to Assistive Technology. 整洁的Gizmo/这看起来很可怕:雇主对辅助技术的反应。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-09 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-023-10145-z
Mason Ameri, Terri Kurtzberg

Purpose: Accommodations are vital for protecting equal access and increasing the employment of people with disabilities. However, the evidence on whether employers are willing or resistant to provide accommodations is mixed. We explore reactions to accommodations specifically associated with Assistive Technologies (AT). While the presence of such a device should reassure hiring managers about the abilities of the candidate to do the job, they also risk raising new questions and uncertainties.

Methods: Hypothetical job candidates with and without disabilities were presented to participants with hiring experience to examine perceptions of employability, risk, and trust. Several conditions included the candidate describing the use of AT (i.e., an exosuit) and requesting accommodations, with and without extra technical or enthusiastic language to explain the specific device.

Results: Quantitative and qualitative results show that the request for accommodations, in general, is problematic. And while using the exosuit seems to benefit perceptions of trust, it still seems risky and does not categorically improve employability perceptions. Extra language provided by the candidate to explain the device did not improve outcomes but did (in the case of enthusiastic language) make people more open to seeing the positive aspects of the device.

Conclusion: While using an AT is a positive advance for a job candidate with a disability, the perceptual risk and the salience of the disability are both increased. Future work is needed to explore the options for better reassuring hiring managers about such devices.

目的:住宿对于保护残疾人的平等机会和增加残疾人的就业至关重要。然而,关于雇主是否愿意或拒绝提供住宿的证据喜忧参半。我们探讨了对专门与辅助技术(AT)相关的住宿的反应。虽然这种设备的存在应该让招聘经理放心候选人的工作能力,但它们也有引发新问题和不确定性的风险。方法:假设有残疾和没有残疾的求职者被介绍给有招聘经验的参与者,以检查他们对就业能力、风险和信任的看法。一些条件包括候选人描述AT(即外泌服)的使用,并要求提供便利,有或没有额外的技术或热情的语言来解释特定的设备。结果:定量和定性结果表明,住宿请求总体上是有问题的。虽然使用外装似乎有利于信任感,但它似乎仍然有风险,并不能完全改善就业能力。候选人提供的解释设备的额外语言并没有改善结果,但确实(在热情语言的情况下)让人们更容易看到设备的积极方面。结论:虽然使用AT对残疾求职者来说是一个积极的进步,但残疾的感知风险和显著性都会增加。未来的工作需要探索更好地让招聘经理放心使用此类设备的选择。
{"title":"Neat Gizmo!/That Looks Scary: Employer Reactions to Assistive Technology.","authors":"Mason Ameri, Terri Kurtzberg","doi":"10.1007/s10926-023-10145-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10926-023-10145-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Accommodations are vital for protecting equal access and increasing the employment of people with disabilities. However, the evidence on whether employers are willing or resistant to provide accommodations is mixed. We explore reactions to accommodations specifically associated with Assistive Technologies (AT). While the presence of such a device should reassure hiring managers about the abilities of the candidate to do the job, they also risk raising new questions and uncertainties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hypothetical job candidates with and without disabilities were presented to participants with hiring experience to examine perceptions of employability, risk, and trust. Several conditions included the candidate describing the use of AT (i.e., an exosuit) and requesting accommodations, with and without extra technical or enthusiastic language to explain the specific device.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative and qualitative results show that the request for accommodations, in general, is problematic. And while using the exosuit seems to benefit perceptions of trust, it still seems risky and does not categorically improve employability perceptions. Extra language provided by the candidate to explain the device did not improve outcomes but did (in the case of enthusiastic language) make people more open to seeing the positive aspects of the device.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While using an AT is a positive advance for a job candidate with a disability, the perceptual risk and the salience of the disability are both increased. Future work is needed to explore the options for better reassuring hiring managers about such devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"316-326"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72015727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long COVID Prevalence, Disability, and Accommodations: Analysis Across Demographic Groups. 长 COVID 流行率、残疾和适应性:跨人口群体分析。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-22 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-024-10173-3
Jennifer Cohen, Yana van der Meulen Rodgers

Purpose: This paper examines the prevalence of long COVID across different demographic groups in the US and the extent to which workers with impairments associated with long COVID have engaged in pandemic-related remote work.

Methods: We use the US Household Pulse Survey to evaluate the proportion of all adults who self-reported to (1) have had long COVID, and (2) have activity limitations due to long COVID. We also use data from the US Current Population Survey to estimate linear probability regressions for the likelihood of pandemic-related remote work among workers with and without disabilities.

Results: Findings indicate that women, Hispanic people, sexual and gender minorities, individuals without 4-year college degrees, and people with preexisting disabilities are more likely to have long COVID and to have activity limitations from long COVID. Remote work is a reasonable arrangement for people with such activity limitations and may be an unintentional accommodation for some people who have undisclosed disabilities. However, this study shows that people with disabilities were less likely than people without disabilities to perform pandemic-related remote work.

Conclusion: The data suggest this disparity persists because people with disabilities are clustered in jobs that are not amenable to remote work. Employers need to consider other accommodations, especially shorter workdays and flexible scheduling, to hire and retain employees who are struggling with the impacts of long COVID.

目的:本文研究了美国不同人口群体中长期COVID的流行情况,以及患有与长COVID相关的损伤的工人从事与大流行相关的远程工作的程度:我们使用美国家庭脉搏调查(US Household Pulse Survey)来评估所有成年人中自我报告(1)有过长时间COVID和(2)因长时间COVID而活动受限的比例。我们还利用美国当前人口调查的数据,对残疾和非残疾工人从事与大流行相关的远程工作的可能性进行了线性概率回归估计:研究结果表明,女性、西班牙裔、性和性别少数群体、没有 4 年制大学学历的人以及患有先天性残疾的人更有可能有较长的 COVID,也更有可能因较长的 COVID 而导致活动受限。远程工作对于有这些活动限制的人来说是一种合理的安排,对于一些有未公开残疾的人来说可能是一种无意的便利。然而,本研究表明,残疾人从事与大流行相关的远程工作的可能性低于非残疾人:数据表明,这种差异之所以持续存在,是因为残障人士集中在不适合远程工作的岗位上。雇主需要考虑提供其他便利,特别是缩短工作日和灵活的时间安排,以雇用和留住那些难以承受长期 COVID 影响的员工。
{"title":"Long COVID Prevalence, Disability, and Accommodations: Analysis Across Demographic Groups.","authors":"Jennifer Cohen, Yana van der Meulen Rodgers","doi":"10.1007/s10926-024-10173-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10926-024-10173-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This paper examines the prevalence of long COVID across different demographic groups in the US and the extent to which workers with impairments associated with long COVID have engaged in pandemic-related remote work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use the US Household Pulse Survey to evaluate the proportion of all adults who self-reported to (1) have had long COVID, and (2) have activity limitations due to long COVID. We also use data from the US Current Population Survey to estimate linear probability regressions for the likelihood of pandemic-related remote work among workers with and without disabilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicate that women, Hispanic people, sexual and gender minorities, individuals without 4-year college degrees, and people with preexisting disabilities are more likely to have long COVID and to have activity limitations from long COVID. Remote work is a reasonable arrangement for people with such activity limitations and may be an unintentional accommodation for some people who have undisclosed disabilities. However, this study shows that people with disabilities were less likely than people without disabilities to perform pandemic-related remote work.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The data suggest this disparity persists because people with disabilities are clustered in jobs that are not amenable to remote work. Employers need to consider other accommodations, especially shorter workdays and flexible scheduling, to hire and retain employees who are struggling with the impacts of long COVID.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"335-349"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11179968/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139933633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Small Empires: How Equipped are Small Business Owners to Hire People with Disabilities? 小帝国:小企业主雇佣残疾人的能力如何?
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-01 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-023-10152-0
Mason Ameri, Terri Kurtzberg

Purpose: This study explores small businesses' knowledge base and practices concerning interviewing and hiring job candidates with disabilities, as they are not required to comply with the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

Methods: We first conducted 18 in-depth interviews with small business owners to explore their knowledge of the ADA, their practices surrounding hiring (for those with and without disabilities), and their sense of the best practices for how a candidate should navigate the interview and request for accommodations. Responses were then used to create a survey of an additional 110 small business owners.

Results: Six themes arose from the interviews, illuminating the steep learning curve involved in each (1) hiring well, (2) the need to trust an employee's character as much as their skill set, (3) the need for an employee to fit within the small business's family-like environment, (4) the preference for job candidates to be transparent about their needs as early as possible, (5) the importance of personal experience with disability, and (6) the difficulty in obtaining precise information about the ADA. Survey responses supported the general findings of the interviews while also providing information about the relative rarity of encountering a job candidate with a disability.

Conclusion: Hiring employees with disabilities is challenging for small businesses, and bias is difficult to avoid. The availability of clear information on how to comply with the ADA and other laws and practices would be welcome by many small business owners.

目的:本研究探讨了小型企业在面试和雇用残疾求职者方面的知识基础和实践,因为他们不需要遵守美国残疾人法案(ADA)的规定。方法:我们首先对小企业主进行了18次深度访谈,以了解他们对《美国残疾人法》的了解,他们在招聘方面的做法(针对有残疾和没有残疾的人),以及他们对候选人应该如何进行面试和要求住宿的最佳做法的看法。然后,这些回答被用来对另外110名小企业主进行调查。结果:从访谈中产生了六个主题,阐明了每个主题所涉及的陡峭的学习曲线(1)招聘好,(2)需要信任员工的品格,就像他们的技能一样,(3)员工需要适应小企业家庭式的环境,(4)希望求职者尽早透明他们的需求,(5)个人残疾经历的重要性,以及(6)获得关于《美国残疾人法》的准确信息的困难。调查结果支持了面试的一般结果,同时也提供了遇到残疾求职者相对罕见的信息。结论:雇用残疾员工对小企业来说是一个挑战,偏见是难以避免的。关于如何遵守《美国残疾人法》和其他法律和惯例的明确信息将受到许多小企业主的欢迎。
{"title":"Small Empires: How Equipped are Small Business Owners to Hire People with Disabilities?","authors":"Mason Ameri, Terri Kurtzberg","doi":"10.1007/s10926-023-10152-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10926-023-10152-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study explores small businesses' knowledge base and practices concerning interviewing and hiring job candidates with disabilities, as they are not required to comply with the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We first conducted 18 in-depth interviews with small business owners to explore their knowledge of the ADA, their practices surrounding hiring (for those with and without disabilities), and their sense of the best practices for how a candidate should navigate the interview and request for accommodations. Responses were then used to create a survey of an additional 110 small business owners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six themes arose from the interviews, illuminating the steep learning curve involved in each (1) hiring well, (2) the need to trust an employee's character as much as their skill set, (3) the need for an employee to fit within the small business's family-like environment, (4) the preference for job candidates to be transparent about their needs as early as possible, (5) the importance of personal experience with disability, and (6) the difficulty in obtaining precise information about the ADA. Survey responses supported the general findings of the interviews while also providing information about the relative rarity of encountering a job candidate with a disability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hiring employees with disabilities is challenging for small businesses, and bias is difficult to avoid. The availability of clear information on how to comply with the ADA and other laws and practices would be welcome by many small business owners.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"350-358"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138463586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1