Ethics, Volume 134, Issue 4, Page 539-558, July 2024.
伦理学》，第 134 卷第 4 期，第 539-558 页，2024 年 7 月。
{"title":"The Problem with Prisons","authors":"Erin I. Kelly","doi":"10.1086/729714","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/729714","url":null,"abstract":"Ethics, Volume 134, Issue 4, Page 539-558, July 2024. <br/>","PeriodicalId":48118,"journal":{"name":"Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141246309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ethics, Volume 134, Issue 4, Page 573-578, July 2024.
伦理学》，第 134 卷第 4 期，第 573-578 页，2024 年 7 月。
{"title":"Stephanie Collins, Organizations as Wrongdoers: From Ontology to Morality","authors":"Kenneth Silver","doi":"10.1086/729711","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/729711","url":null,"abstract":"Ethics, Volume 134, Issue 4, Page 573-578, July 2024. <br/>","PeriodicalId":48118,"journal":{"name":"Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141246328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ethics, Volume 134, Issue 4, Page 594-599, July 2024.
伦理学》，第 134 卷第 4 期，第 594-599 页，2024 年 7 月。
{"title":"Andrew Mason, What’s Wrong with Lookism? Personal Appearance, Discrimination, and Disadvantage","authors":"Julian David Jonker","doi":"10.1086/729699","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/729699","url":null,"abstract":"Ethics, Volume 134, Issue 4, Page 594-599, July 2024. <br/>","PeriodicalId":48118,"journal":{"name":"Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141246323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christian Barry and Garrett Cullity argue that there is a morally important distinction between offsetting by “sequestering” and offsetting by “forestalling.” They further claim that offsetting by sequestering will often make risk-imposing actions permissible, while offsetting by forestalling typically will not. In this article, I highlight some reasons to be skeptical about their view and suggest an alternative account of the conditions in which offsetting can make a risk-imposing action permissible. In addition, I note a significant implication of my argument for the ethics of greenhouse gas offsetting.
Christian Barry 和 Garrett Cullity 认为，"封存 "抵消和 "阻止 "抵消在道德上有重要区别。他们进一步声称，通过 "封存 "来抵消通常会使增加风险的行为成为可允许的行为，而通过 "阻止 "来抵消通常不会。在这篇文章中，我强调了对他们的观点持怀疑态度的一些理由，并对抵消可以使增加风险的行动被允许的条件提出了另一种解释。此外，我还指出了我的论点对温室气体抵消伦理的重要影响。
{"title":"When Is It Permissible to Impose and Offset Risks? A Response to Barry and Cullity","authors":"Brian Berkey","doi":"10.1086/729709","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/729709","url":null,"abstract":"Christian Barry and Garrett Cullity argue that there is a morally important distinction between offsetting by “sequestering” and offsetting by “forestalling.” They further claim that offsetting by sequestering will often make risk-imposing actions permissible, while offsetting by forestalling typically will not. In this article, I highlight some reasons to be skeptical about their view and suggest an alternative account of the conditions in which offsetting can make a risk-imposing action permissible. In addition, I note a significant implication of my argument for the ethics of greenhouse gas offsetting.","PeriodicalId":48118,"journal":{"name":"Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141246294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：