Jama Oncology最新文献

Importance: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative locoregionally advanced (LA) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) appears promising, yet its role in nonsurgical treatment for head and neck cancer remains undefined. Neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy followed by response-stratified de-escalated chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in HPV-negative LA stage IVa/b HNSCC may improve treatment efficacy while reducing treatment-related toxic effects.

Objective: To determine the deep response rate and tolerability of neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy followed by response-stratified CRT in nonvirally mediated stage IVa/b HNSCC.

Design, setting, and participants: In this investigator-initiated phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial conducted at a single academic center, patients with stage IVa/b (American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor Classification, 8th edition) HPV-negative LA HNSCC were enrolled between 2019 and 2022. Data were analyzed from February 2023 to January 2024.

Interventions: The DEPEND trial evaluated neoadjuvant nivolumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel, followed by response-stratified CRT. Patients with 50% or greater reduction per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 received de-escalated CRT to 66 Gy with elimination of elective nodal volumes; patients with less than 50% reduction received standard CRT to 70 to 75 Gy. Adjuvant nivolumab was administered for 9 cycles.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was deep response rate (DRR; 50% or greater shrinkage per RECIST version 1.1) following neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), locoregional control, and distant control. Exploratory end points included acute toxic effects in patients who received response-adapted de-escalated CRT.

Results: Of 36 included patients, 28 (78%) were male, and the median (range) age was 58.9 (27-77) years. All patients started treatment and were available for analysis. The median (range) follow-up was 20 (13-40) months. The primary end point was met, with a DRR following neoadjuvant nivolumab/chemotherapy of 53% (95% CI, 35-70). The objective response rate was 86% (95% CI, 71-95). A total of 19 received de-escalated CRT and 16 received standard CRT. PFS and OS at 2 years were 66% (95% CI, 34-76) and 73% (95% CI, 52-86), respectively. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events for de-escalated and standard CRT were mucositis (14 of 19 [74%] and 15 of 16 [94%], respectively), radiation dermatitis (13 of 19 [68%] and 14 of 16 [88%], respectively), and dry mouth (7 of 19 [37%] and 10 of 16 [63%], respectively).

Conclusions and relevance: In this phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial, neoadjuvant nivolumab/chemotherapy led to deep respon

Importance: The lifetime risk of aging-related diseases among survivors of childhood cancer, accelerated by cancer treatment exposures, is unknown. Understanding this risk can provide a more comprehensive assessment of long-term health across the lifespan of survivors and guide adult care.

Objective: To estimate the lifetime risks of 8 treatment-related cancers and cardiovascular conditions among childhood cancer survivors and compare them with the general population.

Design, setting, participants: Using data from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study and national databases, this simulation modeling study projected long-term outcomes for 5-year survivors diagnosed between 1970 and 1999 based on treatment exposures and age-related risks. The general population comparator was simulated using age-, sex-, and calendar year-matched individuals who faced only age-related risks.

Exposures: Treatment era (1970s, 1980s, 1990s), original cancer diagnosis, radiation treatment for primary diagnosis (any, none).

Main outcomes and measures: Estimated lifetime risks of 8 health conditions (breast cancer, colorectal cancer, glial tumors, sarcomas, heart failure, coronary heart disease/myocardial infarction, stroke, and valvular disease). Risks were projected and compared with the general population, stratified by radiation exposure.

Results: In the general population, 20% developed at least 1 health condition by age 65.0 years; in 5-year survivors this threshold was reached at age 47.3 years, representing a 17.7-year (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 14.0-21.0) acceleration in disease onset. By age 65 years, 55% of survivors were projected to develop at least 1 condition, indicating a 2.7-fold (95% UI, 2.2-3.5) higher relative risk and 34.2% (95% UI, 28.3-42.5) absolute excess risk compared with the general population. Risks were higher among those treated with radiation therapy for childhood cancer (22.0 years earlier onset [95% UI, 18.0-25.0]; 37.3% excess risk [95% UI, 31.6%-44.7%]) but still elevated for those without radiation exposure (13.5 years earlier onset [95% UI, 10.0-16.0]; 31.0% excess risk [95% UI, 23.9%-40.3%]). Reaching middle age was still associated with increased health risks. Compared with the general population, survivors who reached age 40 years had a 6.2-fold higher risk (95% UI, 4.8-9.4) of developing a new condition within 10 years.

Conclusions and relevance: This study found that survivors of childhood cancer experience accelerated onset of aging-related diseases, regardless of prior radiation exposure. These findings underscore the importance of prioritizing cancer and cardiovascular disease prevention among survivors decades earlier than for the general population.

Importance: Since 2003, the Children's Oncology Group (COG) has developed and disseminated the Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines for Survivors of Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancers. These guidelines have benchmarked the standard of care for long-term survivors of childhood cancer in North America and beyond. Since their inception, they have evolved in depth, scope, and contributors to maintain fidelity toward continually emerging evidence related to cancer survivorship. They are intended to inform care for individuals who survived 2 or more years from completion of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer-directed therapy and receiving care in either specialty or primary care environments. The guidelines are updated on a 5-year cycle, during which comprehensive literature searches pertaining to guideline-specific questions are performed, evidence abstracted from pertinent publications, and recommendations determined and scored following expert deliberation.

Observations: Version 6.0 of the guidelines, released in October 2023, comprised 165 sections and 45 health links and represents the cooperative efforts of 220 individuals. Major changes include the addition of recommendations regarding surveillance for genetic cancer predisposition, surveillance following the use of novel cancer treatment modalities, and routine vaccination practices during long-term follow-up. In addition, surveillance echocardiograms were omitted for those at low risk of cardiomyopathy.

Conclusions and relevance: This narrative review outlines the historical evolution of the COG Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines for Survivors of Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancers, current methods guiding their development, and key recommendations from version 6.0. The guidelines are publicly available in their entirety online. The COG guidelines continue to set the standard for surveillance practices for long-term survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer. The growing body of evidence supporting these recommendations will continue to guide their evolution to inform optimal survivorship care practices.