Background
A significant challenge in nursing education is how to effectively bridge the theory-practice gap. The researchers investigated how two different classroom interventions supported the development of clinical judgment (CJ) in prelicensure nursing students.
Methods
The researchers compared the effectiveness of an online simulator (intervention group) versus traditional NCLEX style questions (control group) on students’ CJ development using a mixed method design. Students participated in three required laboratory simulations. The researchers scored each students’ performance using the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR). Post-simulation, students completed the LCJR and Guide for Reflection.
Results
No statistical difference was found between the two groups in LCJR scores. Longitudinal analysis revealed sustained higher scores in both groups as the semester progressed. Narrative reflections from both groups indicated increased confidence, CJ attributes, and positive experiences.
Conclusion
Both groups improved in CJ scores; however, the superiority of the online simulator was not established. Instruction that includes a dynamic and interactive learning environment may include online simulation-based training as an avenue for enhancing CJ and preparing students for real-world practice.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
