首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Minimal Access Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Application of an improved continuous single-layer pancreaticojejunostomy technique in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. 改进的连续单层胰空肠吻合术在腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术中的应用。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-22 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_236_24
Xiaodong Zhou, Xuefeng Bu, Feng Yu, Yongjun Zhang, Leizhou Xia

Abstract: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is a minimally invasive approach for pancreatic head and ampullary tumours, with pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) critically influencing post-operative outcomes. This study aimed to compare a modified continuous single-layer PJ technique with the conventional two-layer method in LPD. A retrospective cohort study of 22 patients undergoing LPD compared the surgical outcomes between the modified group (n = 12) and the conventional group (n = 10). Baseline characteristics were well-matched between the two groups. The modified group demonstrated significantly shorter anastomosis time (19.08 vs. 23.1 min, P < 0.001) and lower abdominal infection rates (0 vs. 3 cases, P = 0.041). No significant differences were observed in clinically relevant post-operative pancreatic fistula or bleeding. Conclusively, the modified continuous single-layer PJ technique appears safe and feasible, offering efficiency advantages without compromising short-term outcomes. However, large-scale randomised controlled trials are warranted to validate safety, efficacy and long-term prognostic implications.

摘要腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(LPD)是治疗胰头和壶腹肿瘤的一种微创方法,胰空肠吻合术(PJ)对术后预后有重要影响。本研究旨在比较改进的连续单层PJ技术与传统的双层PJ技术在LPD中的应用。一项22例LPD患者的回顾性队列研究比较了改良组(n = 12)和常规组(n = 10)的手术结果。两组患者的基线特征吻合良好。改良组吻合时间明显缩短(19.08 vs 23.1 min, P < 0.001),腹部感染率明显降低(0 vs 3例,P = 0.041)。两组术后胰瘘或出血的临床相关情况无显著差异。总之,改进的连续单层PJ技术是安全可行的,在不影响短期效果的情况下提供了效率优势。然而,需要大规模随机对照试验来验证安全性、有效性和长期预后影响。
{"title":"Application of an improved continuous single-layer pancreaticojejunostomy technique in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.","authors":"Xiaodong Zhou, Xuefeng Bu, Feng Yu, Yongjun Zhang, Leizhou Xia","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_236_24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_236_24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is a minimally invasive approach for pancreatic head and ampullary tumours, with pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) critically influencing post-operative outcomes. This study aimed to compare a modified continuous single-layer PJ technique with the conventional two-layer method in LPD. A retrospective cohort study of 22 patients undergoing LPD compared the surgical outcomes between the modified group (n = 12) and the conventional group (n = 10). Baseline characteristics were well-matched between the two groups. The modified group demonstrated significantly shorter anastomosis time (19.08 vs. 23.1 min, P < 0.001) and lower abdominal infection rates (0 vs. 3 cases, P = 0.041). No significant differences were observed in clinically relevant post-operative pancreatic fistula or bleeding. Conclusively, the modified continuous single-layer PJ technique appears safe and feasible, offering efficiency advantages without compromising short-term outcomes. However, large-scale randomised controlled trials are warranted to validate safety, efficacy and long-term prognostic implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144692156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quality-based assessment of laparoscopic camera navigation for resident surgeons - A randomised control study. 住院医师腹腔镜摄像机导航的质量评估-一项随机对照研究。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-22 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_38_25
Ramesh Bhargav Kavuluri, Jayanta Kumar Biswal, Sujit Kumar Mohanty, Deepak Ranjan Nayak

Introduction: The introduction of laparoscopy has revolutionised the field of surgery. Camera navigation is a pivotal factor for a successful laparoscopic surgery. Good camera assistance guides the operating surgeon towards a safe and successful surgery. Laparoscopic camera navigation is a complicated task, requiring specific psychomotor and visuospatial skills. This study aimed to find out whether the objective structured assessment of camera navigation skills (OSA-CNS) is an effective tool for assessment and feedback to the residents.

Patients and methods: This was a single-centre randomised study with a test group and a control group having surgical residents as participants. The sample size is 24, with 12 in each group. Residents were assessed based on the five key parameters of camera navigation skills by an expert surgeon and the operating surgeon. The test and control group scores were analysed along with the progress of the groups after each assessment. Each participant assisted in five laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Statistical tests were conducted using SSPN and R-code.

Results: After the assessment, the test group had improved scores compared to the control group, which was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The analysis of variance test of the groups revealed that the test group participant scores improved after each assessment (F = 23.45, P < 0.001). The residents opined that the objective assessment helped improve their navigation skills.

Conclusion: The data from our study showed that the OSA-CNS is a viable and reliable tool. This structured assessment helps to improve camera navigation and has great scope in the future with regard to surgical training.

导读:腹腔镜技术的引入使外科领域发生了革命性的变化。摄像机导航是腹腔镜手术成功的关键因素。良好的相机辅助指导外科医生进行安全成功的手术。腹腔镜相机导航是一项复杂的任务,需要特定的精神运动和视觉空间技能。本研究旨在探讨相机导航技能的客观结构化评估(OSA-CNS)能否作为一种有效的评估和反馈工具。患者和方法:这是一项单中心随机研究,实验组和对照组均有外科住院医师作为参与者。样本量为24,每组12人。由专家外科医生和手术外科医生根据相机导航技能的五个关键参数对住院医师进行评估。每次评估结束后,分析实验组和对照组的得分以及各组的进展情况。每位参与者协助5例腹腔镜胆囊切除术。采用SSPN和R-code进行统计检验。结果:评估后,实验组得分较对照组有所提高,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。组间方差检验分析显示,每次评估后,试验组参与者得分均有所提高(F = 23.45, P < 0.001)。居民们认为,客观的评估有助于提高他们的导航技能。结论:本研究数据显示OSA-CNS是一种可行、可靠的工具。这种结构化的评估有助于改善相机导航,并在未来的外科训练中有很大的应用范围。
{"title":"Quality-based assessment of laparoscopic camera navigation for resident surgeons - A randomised control study.","authors":"Ramesh Bhargav Kavuluri, Jayanta Kumar Biswal, Sujit Kumar Mohanty, Deepak Ranjan Nayak","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_38_25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_38_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The introduction of laparoscopy has revolutionised the field of surgery. Camera navigation is a pivotal factor for a successful laparoscopic surgery. Good camera assistance guides the operating surgeon towards a safe and successful surgery. Laparoscopic camera navigation is a complicated task, requiring specific psychomotor and visuospatial skills. This study aimed to find out whether the objective structured assessment of camera navigation skills (OSA-CNS) is an effective tool for assessment and feedback to the residents.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This was a single-centre randomised study with a test group and a control group having surgical residents as participants. The sample size is 24, with 12 in each group. Residents were assessed based on the five key parameters of camera navigation skills by an expert surgeon and the operating surgeon. The test and control group scores were analysed along with the progress of the groups after each assessment. Each participant assisted in five laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Statistical tests were conducted using SSPN and R-code.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the assessment, the test group had improved scores compared to the control group, which was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The analysis of variance test of the groups revealed that the test group participant scores improved after each assessment (F = 23.45, P < 0.001). The residents opined that the objective assessment helped improve their navigation skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The data from our study showed that the OSA-CNS is a viable and reliable tool. This structured assessment helps to improve camera navigation and has great scope in the future with regard to surgical training.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144692170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of post-operative pain in laparoscopic extended-view total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty using self-gripping mesh versus polypropylene mesh fixed with absorbable tackers - A parallel-arm, double-blinded randomised control trial. 腹腔镜大视点腹股沟外疝成形术中使用自夹持补片与使用可吸收补片固定聚丙烯补片术后疼痛的比较——一项平行臂、双盲随机对照试验。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-22 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_153_25
S Vidhul Kada, Uday Shamrao Kumbhar, Chellappa Vijayakumar, Abhinaya A Reddy

Introduction: To compare short- and mid-term outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic extended-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) inguinal hernia repair using either self-gripping mesh or polypropylene mesh with absorbable tackers.

Patients and methods: A prospective, parallel-arm, double-blinded randomised controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care centre between April 2023 and July 2024. Adults with primary unilateral uncomplicated inguinal hernias were randomly assigned to receive self-gripping or polypropylene mesh with tackers. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 12 h and on post-operative days 1, 2, 7, 30 and at 3 months. The secondary outcomes included short-term complications, chronic pain, recurrence and quality of life (QoL) using the HerQLes questionnaire. Data were analysed using t-tests or Mann-Whitney U-test for the continuous variables and Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for the categorical variables. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Sixty-two patients were randomised equally. The mean VAS score at 12 h was 4.68 ± 0.94 in the polypropylene mesh group versus 4.58 ± 0.92 in the self-gripping mesh group (P = 0.657). No statistically significant difference in pain was observed at any assessed time point. Chronic pain at 3 months was negligible (mean VAS <1), and no recurrences were detected. Short-term complications and quality-of-life scores (HerQLes) were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusions: Laparoscopic eTEP hernia repair with either self-gripping mesh or polypropylene mesh fixed with absorbable tackers yields similar short- and mid-term outcomes regarding post-operative pain, complications, recurrence and QoL. Both techniques are safe and effective for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair.

前言:比较腹腔镜下大视点全腹股沟疝(eTEP)修补术患者使用自夹持补片或聚丙烯补片与可吸收补片的短期和中期疗效。患者和方法:于2023年4月至2024年7月在一家三级医疗中心进行了一项前瞻性、平行组、双盲随机对照试验。成人原发性单侧无并发症腹股沟疝被随机分配接受自夹持或聚丙烯网与粘钉。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)在12小时、术后1、2、7、30天和3个月对疼痛进行评估。次要结局包括短期并发症、慢性疼痛、复发和使用HerQLes问卷的生活质量(QoL)。对连续变量采用t检验或Mann-Whitney u检验,对分类变量采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验。P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:62例患者平均随机分组。聚丙烯网片组12 h VAS平均评分为4.68±0.94,自夹网片组为4.58±0.92 (P = 0.657)。在任何评估时间点均未观察到疼痛的统计学差异。结论:腹腔镜下eTEP疝修补术采用自夹持补片或聚丙烯补片固定可吸收黏合剂,在术后疼痛、并发症、复发和生活质量方面具有相似的中短期结果。这两种技术对于原发性单侧腹股沟疝修补都是安全有效的。
{"title":"Comparison of post-operative pain in laparoscopic extended-view total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty using self-gripping mesh versus polypropylene mesh fixed with absorbable tackers - A parallel-arm, double-blinded randomised control trial.","authors":"S Vidhul Kada, Uday Shamrao Kumbhar, Chellappa Vijayakumar, Abhinaya A Reddy","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_153_25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_153_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To compare short- and mid-term outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic extended-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) inguinal hernia repair using either self-gripping mesh or polypropylene mesh with absorbable tackers.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A prospective, parallel-arm, double-blinded randomised controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care centre between April 2023 and July 2024. Adults with primary unilateral uncomplicated inguinal hernias were randomly assigned to receive self-gripping or polypropylene mesh with tackers. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 12 h and on post-operative days 1, 2, 7, 30 and at 3 months. The secondary outcomes included short-term complications, chronic pain, recurrence and quality of life (QoL) using the HerQLes questionnaire. Data were analysed using t-tests or Mann-Whitney U-test for the continuous variables and Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for the categorical variables. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-two patients were randomised equally. The mean VAS score at 12 h was 4.68 ± 0.94 in the polypropylene mesh group versus 4.58 ± 0.92 in the self-gripping mesh group (P = 0.657). No statistically significant difference in pain was observed at any assessed time point. Chronic pain at 3 months was negligible (mean VAS <1), and no recurrences were detected. Short-term complications and quality-of-life scores (HerQLes) were comparable between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Laparoscopic eTEP hernia repair with either self-gripping mesh or polypropylene mesh fixed with absorbable tackers yields similar short- and mid-term outcomes regarding post-operative pain, complications, recurrence and QoL. Both techniques are safe and effective for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144692161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A retrospective analysis of post-operative mesh infection after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and preventive measures. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后补片感染的回顾性分析及预防措施。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-22 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_290_24
Pankaj Kataria, Shardool Vikram Gupta, Lalit Kumar Bansal, Atul Jain, Srishti Bishnoi, Neeti Kapur

Introduction: Post-operative mesh infection is a rare but serious complication of laparoscopic hernia surgery. In this study, we share our experience of post-laparoscopic hernia repair mesh infections, with a review of the literature and possible preventive steps that can be taken to for such a dreaded complication.

Patients and methods: This retrospective observational study was done from January 2014 to 30 June 2024. We reviewed the prospectively maintained data of all the patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery. Thousand eight hundred and twenty patients underwent laparoscopic hernia repair, and we found case records of six patients who experienced surgical site infections (SSIs) following laparoscopic inguinal mesh hernioplasty.

Results: The rate of SSI or the mesh infection was 0.34% (6 cases). All were male with 4 of them in the age group between 51 and 60 years. One patient (16.66%) had undergone totally extraperitoneal repair, whereas 5 patients (83.33%) had undergone transabdominal preperitoneal repair. All the patients presented with mesh infection within the first 4 weeks of surgery. Three (50%) of patients presenting with post-mesh infection had different comorbidities. Four (66.6%) patients of post-laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair mesh infection underwent mesh explantation and the remaining 2 (33.33%) were treated conservatively.

Conclusion: Intra-abdominal abscess and mesh infection, though rare, are serious complications of laparoscopic hernia repair. Prevention remains the best approach, and the surgical team must ensure adherence to key preventive measures at each stage.

手术后补片感染是腹腔镜疝手术中一种罕见但严重的并发症。在这项研究中,我们分享了腹腔镜后疝修补网感染的经验,回顾了文献和可能采取的预防措施,以防止这种可怕的并发症。患者和方法:本回顾性观察性研究于2014年1月至2024年6月30日进行。我们回顾了所有接受腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术的患者的前瞻性数据。一千八百二十例患者接受腹腔镜疝修补术,我们发现有六例患者在腹腔镜腹股沟网状疝成形术后发生手术部位感染。结果:SSI或补片感染发生率为0.34%(6例)。所有患者均为男性,其中4人年龄在51至60岁之间。1例(16.66%)行全腹膜外修复术,5例(83.33%)行经腹膜前修复术。所有患者均在手术后4周内出现补片感染。三名(50%)出现补片后感染的患者有不同的合并症。腹腔镜后腹股沟疝修补补片感染4例(66.6%)行补片外植术,其余2例(33.33%)行保守治疗。结论:腹内脓肿和补片感染虽罕见,但却是腹腔镜疝修补术的严重并发症。预防仍然是最好的方法,手术团队必须确保在每个阶段坚持关键的预防措施。
{"title":"A retrospective analysis of post-operative mesh infection after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and preventive measures.","authors":"Pankaj Kataria, Shardool Vikram Gupta, Lalit Kumar Bansal, Atul Jain, Srishti Bishnoi, Neeti Kapur","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_290_24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_290_24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Post-operative mesh infection is a rare but serious complication of laparoscopic hernia surgery. In this study, we share our experience of post-laparoscopic hernia repair mesh infections, with a review of the literature and possible preventive steps that can be taken to for such a dreaded complication.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study was done from January 2014 to 30 June 2024. We reviewed the prospectively maintained data of all the patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery. Thousand eight hundred and twenty patients underwent laparoscopic hernia repair, and we found case records of six patients who experienced surgical site infections (SSIs) following laparoscopic inguinal mesh hernioplasty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of SSI or the mesh infection was 0.34% (6 cases). All were male with 4 of them in the age group between 51 and 60 years. One patient (16.66%) had undergone totally extraperitoneal repair, whereas 5 patients (83.33%) had undergone transabdominal preperitoneal repair. All the patients presented with mesh infection within the first 4 weeks of surgery. Three (50%) of patients presenting with post-mesh infection had different comorbidities. Four (66.6%) patients of post-laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair mesh infection underwent mesh explantation and the remaining 2 (33.33%) were treated conservatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intra-abdominal abscess and mesh infection, though rare, are serious complications of laparoscopic hernia repair. Prevention remains the best approach, and the surgical team must ensure adherence to key preventive measures at each stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144692153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Stapler-assisted endoscopic mini- or less-open sublay technique: How do I do it? 订书机辅助内镜微创或不太开放的内镜下技术:我该怎么做?
IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-22 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_137_25
Alaa Zahalka, Fahim Kanani, Wasim Shaqqur, Asad Asem, Ronit Bar-Haim, Arkadiy Iskhakov, Katia Dayan

Background: This study evaluates the clinical efficacy of the endoscopic mini- or less-open sublay (EMILOS) technique with stapler-assisted fascial closure for ventral hernia repair.

Materials and methods: Twelve patients underwent EMILOS with stapler-assisted fascial closure between July 2022 and August 2024 with a mean follow-up of 12.4 months.

Results: The cohort (7 females and 5 males; mean age: 58.9 ± 16.3 years and body mass index: 27.8 ± 3.5 kg/m²) underwent repair for various ventral hernias (mean defect: 4.9 cm × 5.2 cm). The mean operative time was 95 min. Complications included seroma (17%), surgical site infection (8%) and small bowel obstruction requiring reoperation (8%). The hernia recurrence rate was 8%. Patients reporting excellent quality of life increased from 17% preoperatively to 50% postoperatively.

Conclusions: EMILOS with stapler-assisted closure offers a safe, efficient approach with favourable short-term outcomes, particularly for obese patients and medium-sized hernias. The technique combines enhanced visualisation with efficient fascial closure, yielding an 8% recurrence rate that compares favourably with alternatives. Larger studies with extended follow-up are needed to establish long-term efficacy.

背景:本研究评估内镜下小或少开放下疝(EMILOS)技术联合吻合器辅助筋膜闭合治疗腹疝的临床疗效。材料与方法:2022年7月至2024年8月,12例患者行EMILOS联合订书机辅助筋膜闭合,平均随访12.4个月。结果:队列(女性7人,男性5人;平均年龄:58.9±16.3岁,体重指数:27.8±3.5 kg/m²)行各种腹疝修补术(平均缺损:4.9 cm × 5.2 cm)。平均手术时间为95分钟。并发症包括血肿(17%)、手术部位感染(8%)和需要再次手术的小肠阻塞(8%)。疝复发率为8%。报告良好生活质量的患者从术前的17%增加到术后的50%。结论:EMILOS吻合器辅助闭合提供了一种安全、有效的方法,具有良好的短期效果,特别是对于肥胖患者和中等疝气患者。该技术结合了增强的视觉效果和有效的筋膜闭合,与其他方法相比,复发率为8%。需要更大规模的长期随访研究来确定长期疗效。
{"title":"Stapler-assisted endoscopic mini- or less-open sublay technique: How do I do it?","authors":"Alaa Zahalka, Fahim Kanani, Wasim Shaqqur, Asad Asem, Ronit Bar-Haim, Arkadiy Iskhakov, Katia Dayan","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_137_25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_137_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluates the clinical efficacy of the endoscopic mini- or less-open sublay (EMILOS) technique with stapler-assisted fascial closure for ventral hernia repair.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twelve patients underwent EMILOS with stapler-assisted fascial closure between July 2022 and August 2024 with a mean follow-up of 12.4 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort (7 females and 5 males; mean age: 58.9 ± 16.3 years and body mass index: 27.8 ± 3.5 kg/m²) underwent repair for various ventral hernias (mean defect: 4.9 cm × 5.2 cm). The mean operative time was 95 min. Complications included seroma (17%), surgical site infection (8%) and small bowel obstruction requiring reoperation (8%). The hernia recurrence rate was 8%. Patients reporting excellent quality of life increased from 17% preoperatively to 50% postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EMILOS with stapler-assisted closure offers a safe, efficient approach with favourable short-term outcomes, particularly for obese patients and medium-sized hernias. The technique combines enhanced visualisation with efficient fascial closure, yielding an 8% recurrence rate that compares favourably with alternatives. Larger studies with extended follow-up are needed to establish long-term efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144692173","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Feasibility and outcomes of laparoscopic management in perforation peritonitis: A prospective cohort study with propensity score matching. 腹腔镜治疗穿孔性腹膜炎的可行性和结果:一项倾向评分匹配的前瞻性队列研究。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-22 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_135_25
Shruti Soni, Yash Kumar Parihar, Ramkaran Chaudhary, Naveen Sharma, Mahaveer Singh Rodha, Mahendra Lodha, Manoj Kumar Gupta, Nikhil Kothari, Aditya Baksi, Ashok Kumar Puranik

Background: Perforation peritonitis remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in emergency surgical patients. Conventionally, open laparotomy has been the preferred approach. However, with advancements in minimally invasive techniques, laparoscopic management has emerged as a potential alternative. The study aims to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery compared to open laparotomy in managing perforation peritonitis.

Patients and methods: A prospective observational study was conducted from January 2022 to May 2023 for patients diagnosed with perforation peritonitis. A total of 140 patients were recruited, 110 patients underwent laparotomy while 30 patients underwent laparoscopic management. Propensity score matching (PSM) in 1:1 ratio was applied to balance confounding variables, resulting in two matched groups of 28 patients each. Operative time, length of post-operative stay, post-operative Visual Analogue Scale score, morbidity and mortality rates were compared.

Results: The mean operative time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (217.43 ± 86.10 min) compared to the laparotomy group (182.46 ± 31.63 min; P = 0.049). However, patients in the laparoscopic group experienced a significantly shorter hospital stay (4.39 ± 2.04 days vs. 8.68 ± 3.45 days; P < 0.001) and lower post-operative pain scores at all time points (P < 0.012). The 30-day morbidity rate was lower in the laparoscopic group (10% vs. 32%), with fewer surgical site infections and reoperations.

Conclusion: Laparoscopy is a feasible and effective alternative to laparotomy in selected cases of perforation peritonitis, offering benefits such as reduced post-operative pain and shorter hospital stay. Despite technical challenges, improved surgical expertise and patient selection can enhance its role in emergency surgical settings.

背景:穿孔性腹膜炎仍然是急诊手术患者发病和死亡的重要原因。传统上,开腹手术是首选的方法。然而,随着微创技术的进步,腹腔镜治疗已成为一种潜在的替代方法。本研究旨在评估腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗穿孔性腹膜炎的可行性和有效性。患者和方法:2022年1月至2023年5月,对诊断为穿孔性腹膜炎的患者进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。共招募140例患者,其中110例患者行剖腹手术,30例患者行腹腔镜治疗。采用1:1比例的倾向评分匹配(PSM)来平衡混杂变量,得到两个匹配组,每组28例患者。比较两组手术时间、术后住院时间、术后视觉模拟量表评分、发病率和死亡率。结果:腹腔镜组平均手术时间(217.43±86.10 min)明显长于开腹组(182.46±31.63 min);P = 0.049)。然而,腹腔镜组患者的住院时间明显缩短(4.39±2.04天vs. 8.68±3.45天;P < 0.001),术后各时间点疼痛评分均较低(P < 0.012)。腹腔镜组30天的发病率较低(10% vs. 32%),手术部位感染和再手术较少。结论:在穿孔性腹膜炎患者中,腹腔镜手术是一种可行且有效的替代开腹手术的方法,可减少术后疼痛,缩短住院时间。尽管存在技术上的挑战,但改进的外科专业知识和患者选择可以增强其在紧急外科环境中的作用。
{"title":"Feasibility and outcomes of laparoscopic management in perforation peritonitis: A prospective cohort study with propensity score matching.","authors":"Shruti Soni, Yash Kumar Parihar, Ramkaran Chaudhary, Naveen Sharma, Mahaveer Singh Rodha, Mahendra Lodha, Manoj Kumar Gupta, Nikhil Kothari, Aditya Baksi, Ashok Kumar Puranik","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_135_25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_135_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perforation peritonitis remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in emergency surgical patients. Conventionally, open laparotomy has been the preferred approach. However, with advancements in minimally invasive techniques, laparoscopic management has emerged as a potential alternative. The study aims to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery compared to open laparotomy in managing perforation peritonitis.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted from January 2022 to May 2023 for patients diagnosed with perforation peritonitis. A total of 140 patients were recruited, 110 patients underwent laparotomy while 30 patients underwent laparoscopic management. Propensity score matching (PSM) in 1:1 ratio was applied to balance confounding variables, resulting in two matched groups of 28 patients each. Operative time, length of post-operative stay, post-operative Visual Analogue Scale score, morbidity and mortality rates were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean operative time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (217.43 ± 86.10 min) compared to the laparotomy group (182.46 ± 31.63 min; P = 0.049). However, patients in the laparoscopic group experienced a significantly shorter hospital stay (4.39 ± 2.04 days vs. 8.68 ± 3.45 days; P < 0.001) and lower post-operative pain scores at all time points (P < 0.012). The 30-day morbidity rate was lower in the laparoscopic group (10% vs. 32%), with fewer surgical site infections and reoperations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopy is a feasible and effective alternative to laparotomy in selected cases of perforation peritonitis, offering benefits such as reduced post-operative pain and shorter hospital stay. Despite technical challenges, improved surgical expertise and patient selection can enhance its role in emergency surgical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144692165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The clinical advantages of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with endoscopic mucosal resection for early oesophageal cancer and pre-cancer lesions. 早期食管癌及癌前病变的内镜下粘膜夹层与内镜下粘膜切除术的临床优势比较
IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-22 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_72_24
Xiaoting Hou, Tingting Ding, Gai Zhou, Guanqi Liu, Rui Yin, Jing Ying, Jianxin Ge, Yongjian Lv

Objective: The objective of the study was to compare the effects of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the treatment of early oesophageal cancer.

Subjects and methods: Eighty-six patients with early oesophageal cancer and precancerous lesions admitted to our hospital from November 2021 to December 2023 were randomly divided into a treatment group (ESD: 43 cases) and control group (EMR: 43 cases). The efficacy and safety of the two methods were compared.

Results: The operation time of ESD was 117.65 ± 19.98, which was longer than that of EMR group (P < 0.05). The hospitalization time of patients in the ESD group was shorter than that in the EMR group (7.51 ± 1.30 vs. 9.16 ± 2.01 days, P < 0.05). Comparable en bloc resection rate, complete resection rate, and curative resection rate of patients in the ESD group (100.0%, 95.35%, and 93.02%) and EMR group (100.0%, 93.02%, and 90.70%) were observed (P > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the ESD group was 4.65%, which was lower than 13.95% in the EMR group (P > 0.05). No recurrence or metastasis of the primary lesions occurred in both groups. Both groups were displaying better postoperative life quality comparing to that of pre-operation. The quality of life in the ESD group was significantly better than that of the EMR group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Compared with EMR, ESD showed better clinical effects, fewer postoperative complications and higher safety in treating early oesophageal cancer and precancerous lesions. However, the diameter of the lesion should be considered for an optimal surgical plan.

目的:比较内镜下粘膜切除(EMR)与内镜下粘膜剥离(ESD)治疗早期食管癌的疗效。对象与方法:选取我院2021年11月至2023年12月收治的早期食管癌及癌前病变患者86例,随机分为治疗组(ESD) 43例和对照组(EMR) 43例。比较两种方法的疗效和安全性。结果:ESD组手术时间(117.65±19.98)明显长于EMR组(P < 0.05)。ESD组患者住院时间(7.51±1.30 d)短于EMR组(9.16±2.01 d) (P < 0.05)。ESD组患者的整体切除率、完全切除率和治愈率(分别为100.0%、95.35%和93.02%)与EMR组患者的整体切除率、完全切除率和治愈率(分别为100.0%、93.02%和90.70%)比较(P < 0.05)。ESD组术后并发症发生率为4.65%,低于EMR组的13.95% (P < 0.05)。两组患者原发病灶均未发生复发或转移。两组患者术后生活质量均优于术前。ESD组患者的生存质量明显优于EMR组(P < 0.05)。结论:与EMR相比,ESD治疗早期食管癌及癌前病变的临床效果更好,术后并发症更少,安全性更高。然而,病变的直径应考虑到最佳的手术计划。
{"title":"The clinical advantages of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with endoscopic mucosal resection for early oesophageal cancer and pre-cancer lesions.","authors":"Xiaoting Hou, Tingting Ding, Gai Zhou, Guanqi Liu, Rui Yin, Jing Ying, Jianxin Ge, Yongjian Lv","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_72_24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_72_24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of the study was to compare the effects of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the treatment of early oesophageal cancer.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Eighty-six patients with early oesophageal cancer and precancerous lesions admitted to our hospital from November 2021 to December 2023 were randomly divided into a treatment group (ESD: 43 cases) and control group (EMR: 43 cases). The efficacy and safety of the two methods were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The operation time of ESD was 117.65 ± 19.98, which was longer than that of EMR group (P < 0.05). The hospitalization time of patients in the ESD group was shorter than that in the EMR group (7.51 ± 1.30 vs. 9.16 ± 2.01 days, P < 0.05). Comparable en bloc resection rate, complete resection rate, and curative resection rate of patients in the ESD group (100.0%, 95.35%, and 93.02%) and EMR group (100.0%, 93.02%, and 90.70%) were observed (P > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the ESD group was 4.65%, which was lower than 13.95% in the EMR group (P > 0.05). No recurrence or metastasis of the primary lesions occurred in both groups. Both groups were displaying better postoperative life quality comparing to that of pre-operation. The quality of life in the ESD group was significantly better than that of the EMR group (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with EMR, ESD showed better clinical effects, fewer postoperative complications and higher safety in treating early oesophageal cancer and precancerous lesions. However, the diameter of the lesion should be considered for an optimal surgical plan.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144692174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating the feasibility of two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A minimally invasive approach. 评估双孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的可行性:一种微创方法。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-22 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_13_25
Xiufeng Chu, Fengfeng Chen, Yichen Yu, Guoping Ding, Liping Cao

Objective: To establish a two-port minimally invasive laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) technique that minimises surgical scarring and alleviates post-operative pain.

Methods: A cohort study was conducted, enrolling patients meeting the inclusion criteria to undergo two-port minimally invasive LC. The outcomes were compared with those of patients who underwent conventional LC performed by other medical teams. The clinical and pathological data were collected. Visual Analogue Scale scores were used to assess incision pain on post-operative days 1 and 15. Statistical analyses were performed to compare pain scores between the groups.

Results: Between November 2020 and June 2021, 56 patients met the screening criteria and were enrolled in the study group. Of these, 42 patients successfully underwent two-port LC, while 14 cases were converted to conventional three-port LC. No post-operative complications, such as bleeding or bile leakage, occurred, and all patients were discharged without incident. On day 1 post-surgery, the average incision pain score in the two-port LC group was 1.4 ± 0.95, significantly lower than 1.8 ± 1.32 in the conventional LC group (P = 0.02). On day 15 post-surgery, 13 patients (23.2%) in the two-port LC group reported subxiphoid incision pain, compared to 63 patients (41.4%) in the conventional LC group.

Conclusion: For patients meeting indications for conventional LC, early implementation of two-port minimally invasive LC achieved a success rate of 75%. Compared to conventional LC, this technique did not significantly shorten operative time or reduce the complication rates. However, it decreased the number of incisions to two, reduced scar size from 10 mm to 3 mm and significantly alleviated post-operative pain. It is worthy of clinical application and promotion.

目的:建立一种双孔微创腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)技术,以最大限度地减少手术疤痕和减轻术后疼痛。方法:采用队列研究,纳入符合入选标准的患者行双孔微创LC。将结果与其他医疗团队进行常规LC的患者进行比较。收集临床及病理资料。术后第1天和第15天采用视觉模拟评分法评估切口疼痛。对两组疼痛评分进行统计学分析比较。结果:在2020年11月至2021年6月期间,56名符合筛查标准的患者被纳入研究组。其中42例成功行双孔LC, 14例转为常规三孔LC。术后无出血、胆漏等并发症发生,均顺利出院。术后第1天,双孔LC组平均切口疼痛评分为1.4±0.95分,显著低于常规LC组1.8±1.32分(P = 0.02)。术后15天,双孔LC组有13例(23.2%)患者报告剑突下切口疼痛,而常规LC组有63例(41.4%)患者报告。结论:对于符合常规LC指征的患者,早期实施双孔微创LC的成功率为75%。与传统LC相比,该技术没有显著缩短手术时间或减少并发症发生率。然而,它将切口数量减少到2个,疤痕大小从10毫米减少到3毫米,并显着减轻了术后疼痛。值得临床推广应用。
{"title":"Evaluating the feasibility of two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A minimally invasive approach.","authors":"Xiufeng Chu, Fengfeng Chen, Yichen Yu, Guoping Ding, Liping Cao","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_13_25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_13_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To establish a two-port minimally invasive laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) technique that minimises surgical scarring and alleviates post-operative pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort study was conducted, enrolling patients meeting the inclusion criteria to undergo two-port minimally invasive LC. The outcomes were compared with those of patients who underwent conventional LC performed by other medical teams. The clinical and pathological data were collected. Visual Analogue Scale scores were used to assess incision pain on post-operative days 1 and 15. Statistical analyses were performed to compare pain scores between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between November 2020 and June 2021, 56 patients met the screening criteria and were enrolled in the study group. Of these, 42 patients successfully underwent two-port LC, while 14 cases were converted to conventional three-port LC. No post-operative complications, such as bleeding or bile leakage, occurred, and all patients were discharged without incident. On day 1 post-surgery, the average incision pain score in the two-port LC group was 1.4 ± 0.95, significantly lower than 1.8 ± 1.32 in the conventional LC group (P = 0.02). On day 15 post-surgery, 13 patients (23.2%) in the two-port LC group reported subxiphoid incision pain, compared to 63 patients (41.4%) in the conventional LC group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients meeting indications for conventional LC, early implementation of two-port minimally invasive LC achieved a success rate of 75%. Compared to conventional LC, this technique did not significantly shorten operative time or reduce the complication rates. However, it decreased the number of incisions to two, reduced scar size from 10 mm to 3 mm and significantly alleviated post-operative pain. It is worthy of clinical application and promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144692163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes of various bailout strategies for managing different categories of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy - An experience of over two decades from a single surgical unit at a tertiary care teaching hospital. 管理不同类型困难腹腔镜胆囊切除术的各种救助策略的结果-来自三级护理教学医院单一外科单位的二十多年经验。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-22 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_163_25
Asuri Krishna, Sanjeet Kumar Rai, Mayank Jain, Om Prakash, Mahesh C Misra, Subodh Kumar, Virinder Kumar Bansal

Introduction: A difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), if not handled appropriately, can lead to devastating complications. We hereby describe our experience and outcomes of patients with difficult LC over the last two decades, with various bailout strategies to achieve a very low conversion rate and bile duct injury rate.

Patients and methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of patients labelled as difficult LC in a single surgical unit at a tertiary care teaching hospital from January 2004 to December 2020. The pre-operative, peri-operative and follow-up data of all these patients were obtained from a prospectively maintained electronic database.

Results: Between January 2004 and December 2020, 3726 patients underwent elective LC, of which 649 (17.4%) cholecystectomies were deemed difficult. Using the various bailout strategies, we were able to achieve a conversion rate of 4.9% and bile duct injury rate of 0.1% with an overall morbidity of 8%.

Conclusion: When a difficult situation occurs, the benefit of removing the complete gall bladder is outweighed by the risk of a major injury, so a bailout strategy needs to be used. The present series reiterates the use of bailout strategies to not only decrease conversion but also achieve a minimal BDI rate.

一个困难的腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC),如果处理不当,可以导致毁灭性的并发症。在此,我们描述了过去二十年来我们治疗难治性LC患者的经验和结果,采用了各种救助策略,以达到极低的转换率和胆管损伤率。患者和方法:本研究回顾性分析了2004年1月至2020年12月在一家三级护理教学医院的单个外科单元中标记为困难LC的患者。所有患者的术前、围手术期和随访数据均来自前瞻性维护的电子数据库。结果:2004年1月至2020年12月,3726例患者接受了选择性LC,其中649例(17.4%)胆囊切除术被认为是困难的。使用各种救助策略,我们能够实现4.9%的转换率和0.1%的胆管损伤率,总发病率为8%。结论:当出现困难情况时,切除完整胆囊的好处大于重大损伤的风险,因此需要采用紧急救助策略。本系列重申使用救助策略不仅可以减少转换,而且可以实现最小的BDI率。
{"title":"Outcomes of various bailout strategies for managing different categories of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy - An experience of over two decades from a single surgical unit at a tertiary care teaching hospital.","authors":"Asuri Krishna, Sanjeet Kumar Rai, Mayank Jain, Om Prakash, Mahesh C Misra, Subodh Kumar, Virinder Kumar Bansal","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_163_25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_163_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), if not handled appropriately, can lead to devastating complications. We hereby describe our experience and outcomes of patients with difficult LC over the last two decades, with various bailout strategies to achieve a very low conversion rate and bile duct injury rate.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study was a retrospective analysis of patients labelled as difficult LC in a single surgical unit at a tertiary care teaching hospital from January 2004 to December 2020. The pre-operative, peri-operative and follow-up data of all these patients were obtained from a prospectively maintained electronic database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between January 2004 and December 2020, 3726 patients underwent elective LC, of which 649 (17.4%) cholecystectomies were deemed difficult. Using the various bailout strategies, we were able to achieve a conversion rate of 4.9% and bile duct injury rate of 0.1% with an overall morbidity of 8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When a difficult situation occurs, the benefit of removing the complete gall bladder is outweighed by the risk of a major injury, so a bailout strategy needs to be used. The present series reiterates the use of bailout strategies to not only decrease conversion but also achieve a minimal BDI rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144692169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factors leading to post-cholecystectomy bleeding requiring reoperation: A case series. 导致胆囊切除术后出血需要再次手术的因素:一个病例系列。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-07-22 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_366_24
Mena Louis, Nathaniel Grabill, Baraa Mohamed, Emily Murdoch, Morgan A Krause, Bradley Kuhn

Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is widely regarded as the standard treatment for symptomatic gall bladder diseases due to its minimally invasive nature and favorable recovery profile. However, hemorrhagic complications pose significant risks to patient safety and outcomes.

Patients and methods: This retrospective case series aimed to evaluate the incidence, risk factors and outcomes associated with intraoperative and post-operative hemorrhagic complications in patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Eighteen patients who experienced significant bleeding necessitating unplanned reoperations were included in the analysis. Data were collected encompassing demographic information, comorbidities, surgical details and post-operative outcomes.

Results: The study found that older age and higher body mass index (BMI) were strongly correlated with increased estimated blood loss, with each additional year of age increasing the odds of severe hemorrhage by 7% and each unit increase in BMI raising the odds by 15%. Patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists classifications of 3-4 were 3.5 times more likely to experience severe bleeding. In addition, the use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy was associated with a nearly six-fold increase in the risk of significant hemorrhage. The presence of adhesions or severe inflammation further doubled the risk of substantial blood loss. Hemorrhagic complications were associated with prolonged hospital stays, higher rates of blood transfusions and increased mortality.

Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of pre-operative risk assessment and tailored surgical strategies to mitigate bleeding risks. Enhancing patient evaluation and optimizing surgical techniques are crucial for improving outcomes and ensuring patient safety in cholecystectomy procedures.

腹腔镜胆囊切除术因其微创性和良好的恢复特点而被广泛认为是有症状的胆囊疾病的标准治疗方法。然而,出血性并发症对患者安全和预后构成重大风险。患者和方法:本回顾性病例系列旨在评估胆囊切除术患者术中和术后出血并发症的发生率、危险因素和结局。我们分析了18例因大出血而不得不进行非计划再手术的患者。收集的数据包括人口统计信息、合并症、手术细节和术后结果。结果:研究发现,年龄越大和身体质量指数(BMI)越高与估计失血量的增加密切相关,年龄每增加一岁,严重出血的几率就增加7%,BMI每增加一个单位,出血的几率就增加15%。美国麻醉学会分类为3-4级的患者出现严重出血的可能性高出3.5倍。此外,使用抗凝或抗血小板治疗与显著出血风险增加近6倍相关。粘连或严重炎症的存在进一步增加了大量失血的风险。出血性并发症与住院时间延长、输血率升高和死亡率增加有关。结论:这些发现强调了术前风险评估和量身定制的手术策略对于降低出血风险的重要性。加强患者评估和优化手术技术对于改善胆囊切除术的结果和确保患者安全至关重要。
{"title":"Factors leading to post-cholecystectomy bleeding requiring reoperation: A case series.","authors":"Mena Louis, Nathaniel Grabill, Baraa Mohamed, Emily Murdoch, Morgan A Krause, Bradley Kuhn","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_366_24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_366_24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is widely regarded as the standard treatment for symptomatic gall bladder diseases due to its minimally invasive nature and favorable recovery profile. However, hemorrhagic complications pose significant risks to patient safety and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective case series aimed to evaluate the incidence, risk factors and outcomes associated with intraoperative and post-operative hemorrhagic complications in patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Eighteen patients who experienced significant bleeding necessitating unplanned reoperations were included in the analysis. Data were collected encompassing demographic information, comorbidities, surgical details and post-operative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that older age and higher body mass index (BMI) were strongly correlated with increased estimated blood loss, with each additional year of age increasing the odds of severe hemorrhage by 7% and each unit increase in BMI raising the odds by 15%. Patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists classifications of 3-4 were 3.5 times more likely to experience severe bleeding. In addition, the use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy was associated with a nearly six-fold increase in the risk of significant hemorrhage. The presence of adhesions or severe inflammation further doubled the risk of substantial blood loss. Hemorrhagic complications were associated with prolonged hospital stays, higher rates of blood transfusions and increased mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the importance of pre-operative risk assessment and tailored surgical strategies to mitigate bleeding risks. Enhancing patient evaluation and optimizing surgical techniques are crucial for improving outcomes and ensuring patient safety in cholecystectomy procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144692164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1