Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy最新文献

Background and purpose: Sarcopenic obesity is associated with loss of independence among older adults, but the epidemiology of sarcopenic obesity and associated geriatric vulnerabilities are poorly understood. Thus, our objectives were to: (1) estimate the prevalence of older adults with sarcopenic obesity and (2) examine rates of geriatric vulnerabilities among obese older adults, with and without sarcopenia.

Methods: A nationally representative sample of 1600 community-dwelling older adults 65 years and older with obesity and documented measures of muscle function from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) was identified as sarcopenic using sex-adjusted grip strength and Short Physical Performance Battery scores. Differences in the prevalence of geriatric vulnerabilities (including pain, depression, disability, and social isolation) were compared between obese older adults with and without sarcopenia.

Results and discussion: Among obese older adults, 18% (n = 318/1600) were sarcopenic. After adjusting for age and sex, sarcopenic obese older adults had 3.7 times the odds of having 2 or more comorbid conditions (odds ratio [OR] = 3.7; 95% CI 2.2-5.0) and 6.4 times the odds of being frail (OR = 6.4; 95% CI 4.4-9.5) as compared with nonsarcopenic obese older adults. Sarcopenic obese older adults were also more likely to have 1 or more activities of daily living disabilities (OR = 3.7; 95% CI 2.5-5.4), be socially isolated (OR = 2.1; 95% CI 1.3-3.2), and report activity-limiting pain (OR = 2.0; 95% CI 1.5-2.7) as compared with nonsarcopenic obese older adults. These findings, in a nationally representative cohort, suggest obese older adults who are sarcopenic have higher rates of geriatric vulnerabilities that could impact delivery and outcomes of exercise and nutrition interventions.

Conclusions: Concomitant obesity and sarcopenia are associated with higher rates of geriatric vulnerabilities among a nationally representative sample of older adults. More comprehensive interventions, beyond exercise and diet modifications, may be necessary to additionally address these newly identified social and physiological risks.

Background and purpose: Falls are a leading cause of injury, morbidity, and mortality among older adults. Physical therapists are underutilized for fall prevention despite strong evidence and recommendations regarding their effectiveness. The purpose of this study was to explore older adults' awareness of and perceptions regarding the role of physical therapists for fall prevention. A secondary purpose of the study was to identify barriers to utilization of preventive rehabilitation services.

Methods: A qualitative, descriptive, phenomenological approach was used. Participant demographics and fall history were obtained with a standard questionnaire. Four focus groups were conducted with 27 community-dwelling older adults (average age = 78 years). Focus groups were recorded, transcribed, and coded using thematic analysis.

Results: Surveys indicated 37% of participants experienced a fall in the last year and 26% reported sustaining an injury. Four main themes and 5 subthemes about older adults' perceptions of physical therapy providers emerged: (1) awareness of fall prevention (subthemes: I can or have taken action to prevent falls, I don't think about it, and I am more careful); (2) learning how to fall and being able to get up from the floor; (3) limited knowledge regarding the role of physical therapists for fall prevention; and (4) a physical therapist should be seen for a specific problem, or after a fall (subthemes: perceived need and costs, and access requires a doctor's prescription).

Conclusion: Older adults lack awareness about the role of physical therapists for fall prevention, believing they should only seek treatment from a physical therapist to address a specific problem, or after a fall. The profession should consider addressing misconceptions and underutilization by educating the public that physical therapists can and do play an important role in the prevention of falls. Being explicit about the prevention of falls throughout an older adults' episode of care may further help reinforce the role of physical therapists for fall prevention and improve dissemination of this knowledge.

Background and purpose: Physical functioning refers to the ability to independently perform activities that require physical ability, and may be an important tool for predicting a higher risk of hospitalization. The objective of this study was to verify whether aspects of physical functioning are independently associated with the risk for new hospitalization in older adults seen in primary health care.

Methods: This prospective cohort study consisted of 473 older adults 60 years and older who had not been hospitalized in the prior year. Hospitalization records were obtained with authorization from the hospital admission. Depending on physical functioning, the probability of a new hospital admission within the next 5 years was determined based on survival analysis and the Kaplan-Meier curve. Physical functioning was evaluated using 5 easy-to-administer tests: handgrip strength using a Jamar dynamometer, functional performance using the Short Physical Performance Battery, balance using the step test, mobility using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and gait speed using the 4-m walk test. The association between poor physical functioning and new hospitalization was verified using a Cox regression model, adjusted for sex, age, number of comorbidities, number of medications, and BMI. Models were implemented separately for each physical functioning test.

Results: In the sample, 32% had been hospitalized at least once in 5 years. The Kaplan-Meier curve showed a decrease in the probability of nonhospitalization within the next 5 years. Cox regression analysis showed an association between hospitalization within the next 5 years and mobility on the TUG test of more than 12.4 seconds in the crude (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.10-1.60) and adjusted models (HR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.02-1.56), and balance using the step test of more than 7.5 seconds in the crude (HR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.03-1.56) model.

Conclusions: Physical functioning tests demonstrated that poor physical performance predicts new hospitalization, and reinforced the importance of their application in physical therapy practice in primary health care settings.

Background and purpose: Falls can result in bone fractures and disability, presenting a serious threat to quality of life and independence in older adults. The majority of falls in community-living older adults occur while walking and are often caused by trips and slips. The study aimed to identify the specific sensorimotor and psychological factors required for older adults to recover balance from trips and slips.

Methods: Forty-one older adults aged 65 to 87 years were assessed on sensorimotor (knee extension strength, proprioception, postural sway, and edge contrast sensitivity), reaction (simple reaction time, stepping, and catching reaction inhibition), and psychological (general anxiety and concern about falling) measures. Using a harness system, participants walked at 90% of their usual pace on a 10-m walkway that could induce trips and slips in concealed and changeable locations. Post-perturbation responses resulting in more than 30% of body weight being recorded by the harness system were defined as falls. Poisson regressions were used to test associations between the sensorimotor, reaction, and psychological measures and number of falls.

Results: Fifty-one falls occurred in 25 of 41 participants. Poisson regression revealed body mass index, lower-limb proprioception, knee extension strength, rapid inhibition accuracy, concern about falling, and anxiety were significantly associated with the rate of falls. Other measures including postural sway were not statistically significant. Using stepwise Poisson regression analyses, normalized knee extension strength (rate ratio [RR]: 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47-0.98), and rapid inhibition accuracy (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.46-0.87) were independently associated with falls.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest rapid inhibition accuracy and adequate leg strength are required for older adults to recover balance from trips and slips. The mechanisms for balance recovery during daily life activities are likely different from those for static balance, suggesting the need for task-specific assessments and interventions for fall prevention in older adults.

Background and purpose: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is associated with high health care utilization for older adults. Physical therapy (PT) offers low medical risk and reduced cost burden with functional outcomes that appear to be equivalent to higher risk interventions such as surgery. However, it is unknown whether receipt of PT following incident LSS diagnosis is associated with reduced health care utilization. The objectives of this study were to: (1) compare health characteristics for Medicare beneficiaries who received outpatient PT within 30 days of incident LSS diagnosis to those who did not; (2) compare the 1-year utilization rates for specific health care services for these 2 groups; and (3) quantify the likelihood of progression to specific health services based on the receipt of PT.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study using nationally representative claims data for Medicare Part B beneficiaries between 2007 and 2010. Lumbar spinal stenosis was determined using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. Beneficiaries 65 years and older were classified into 2 groups (PT and no PT) based on receipt of PT within 30 days of initial diagnosis. Baseline characteristics were identified at incident diagnosis. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated for the risk of receiving health services outcomes including spinal surgery, spinal injections, chiropractic care, advanced imaging, spinal radiographs, opioid medication, nonopioid analgesics, and hospitalizations beginning on day 31 up to 1 year following incident LSS diagnosis.

Results and discussion: Among 60 646 Medicare beneficiaries with incident LSS who met the inclusion criteria, 1124 were classified in the PT group and 59 522 in the no PT group. Compared with the PT group, beneficiaries in the no PT group had a greater risk of having hospitalizations (HR = 1.40), opioid medications (HR = 1.29), spinal surgery (HR = 1.29), and spinal radiographs (HR = 1.19) within 1 year.

Conclusions: Fewer than 2% of Medicare beneficiaries received PT within 30 days of initial LSS diagnosis. Receipt of PT was associated with less utilization of higher risk and costly health services for 1 year. These results may inform practitioners when making early decisions about rehabilitative care for older adults with LSS.

Background and purpose: The backward walk test (BWT) has been used to evaluate the balance, gait, and fall risk for older adults, but its psychometric properties in older adults with dementia have not been investigated. This study aims to examine the test-retest and interrater reliability, construct and known-group validity, and absolute and relative minimal detectable changes at the 95% level of confidence (MDC95) of the BWT in older adults with dementia.

Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study with repeated measures. Thirty older adults with a mean age of 83.3 years and a diagnosis of dementia who were able to walk backward independently for at least 3 m were recruited from day care and residential care units. The BWT was conducted on 3 separate testing occasions within 2 weeks under 2 independent raters using a modified progressive cueing system. The 10-m walk test (10MWT), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and Timed Up and Go test (TUG) were used to assess the gait, balance, and mobility performances of the participants.

Results and discussion: The BWT had excellent test-retest reliability-intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.96-and interrater reliability (ICC = 0.97-0.97) in the participants. Moderate correlations between the BWT and BBS (Spearman's ρ = 0.60) and strong correlations between the BWT and 10MWT (ρ= 0.84) and TUG (ρ=-0.82) were found. The BWT could distinguish between the participants who ambulated with walking aids and those who did not (P = .005). The participants who had experienced a fall in the past year did not differ significantly in the BWT compared with those who had not fallen (P = .36). The absolute and relative MDC95 of the BWT in the participants were 0.10 m/s and 39.3%, respectively.

Conclusions: The BWT is reliable and valid in assessing balance and gait performances in older adults with dementia. Further investigation is needed to determine whether the BWT can identify those with an increased risk of falls.

Background and purpose: Slow gait speed has been associated with adverse outcomes in older adults, but little data exist for those 90 years and older, a group often referred to as the "oldest old." We aimed to establish reference values for gait speed in men and women 90 years and older.

Methods: The 90+ Study is a population-based longitudinal study of aging. Our analyses of gait speed included participants who were evaluated in person and were ambulatory. Gait speed was assessed using the 4-m walk test. We calculated means, standard deviations, and percentiles stratified by age, sex, and use of assistive device.

Results and discussion: The 797 participants had a mean age of 93.5 years. Of these, 73.9% were women, 39.5% had a college education, and 98.6% were White. The overall mean gait speed was 0.58 m/s (women = 0.55 m/s, men = 0.65 m/s). In participants who did not use an assistive device, the overall mean gait speed was 0.66 m/s (women = 0.63 m/s, men = 0.71 m/s). In those who used a device, the overall mean gait speed was 0.38 m/s (women = 0.37 m/s, men = 0.43 m/s). Gait speed decreased with increasing age. Men had consistently higher average gait speeds compared with women across age categories. Men and women who used assistive devices had lower average gait speeds across age categories compared with men and women who ambulated with no device. Average gait speeds in our oldest-old cohort were slower than those of older adults younger than 90 years in previous studies.

Conclusions: This study is the first to establish gait speed reference values specific to adults 90 years and older. Age-appropriate reference values are crucial to the accurate interpretation of clinical measures for patients in their 90s and above.

Background and purpose: Mobility is a basic human need, and its limitation compromises health status, especially in older adults from developing countries and residing in nursing homes. This study aims to determine the prevalence and factors associated with mobility limitation in older adults residing in nursing homes.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 305 older adults (≥60 years) residing in 10 nursing homes in Northeast Brazil. Mobility limitation was evaluated using the "walking" item of the Barthel index. Sociodemographic/economic data concerning the participants and institutions, as well as conditions that could influence the mobility state of the older adults, were collected. The χ2 test and multiple logistic regression were performed using a significance level of 5%.

Results and discussion: The prevalence of mobility limitation was 65.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59.6-70.4). Walking dependence was identified in 39.7% of the sample (26.9% wheelchair users and 12.8% bedridden), while 25.9% walked with assistance (16.7% with maximal assistance and 9.2% with minimal assistance). Mobility limitation was significantly associated with malnutrition/risk of malnutrition (1.86, 95% CI, 1.54-2.26, P < .001) and age ≥81 years (1.35, 95% CI, 1.12-1.63, P = .002).

Conclusion: Mobility limitation has a high prevalence among older adults residing in nursing homes in Brazil, and is associated with advanced age and poor nutritional status. Health professionals should advocate for the maintenance of mobility and adequate nutritional support.

Background and purpose: We followed and documented skeletal muscle adaptations from 4 resistance exercise (RE) prescriptions in older adults over the course of a 2-year, 80-week training study.

Methods: Forty-three older men and women-65.2 (3.5) years, 167.2 (7.5) cm, and 72.5 (14.7) kg-completed one of the following RE prescriptions: high-load 2 days per week (HL2D; n = 12), low-load 2 days per week (LL2D; n = 9), high-load 3 days per week (HL3D, n = 12), or low-load 3 days per week (LL3D, n = 10). High-load prescriptions consisted of 3 sets of 8 repetitions with 80% 1-repetition maximum (1-RM) and low-load prescriptions completed 3 sets of 16 repetitions with 40% 1-RM. Each session consisted of 12 exercises targeting major muscle groups and training loads were adjusted every fifth week to maintain progressive overload. Participants completed 40 weeks of supervised training, had a 2-month break, and then resumed another 40 weeks of supervised training. Bone-free lean body mass (BFLBM) and appendicular lean mass (ALM) were assessed via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and muscle cross-sectional area (mCSA) of the rectus femoris with diagnostic ultrasound across the intervention.

Results and discussion: Groups responded similarly with significant increases in total strength (54.9%), upper body strength (42.7%), lower body strength (61.5%), and specific strength (50.3%, strength/BFLBM) over 80 weeks (all P < .001). Significant increases for BFLBM (3.0%), ALM (3.5%), and mCSA (48.7%) were also observed (all P ≤ .019). The only difference among groups indicated HL3D displaying significantly greater percent increase than LL2D for ALM (P = .043).

Conclusions: Resistance exercise performed 2 or 3 days per week with moderate to heavy loads can improve muscle strength and induce small but perhaps clinically significant increases in BFLBM and mCSA in older adults over a 2-year period of supervised training.